Informa2on Retrieval

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Informa2on Retrieval Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Brief (non‐technical) history . Early keyword‐based engines ca. 1995‐1997 Introducon to . Altavista, Excite, Infoseek, Inktomi, Lycos Informaon Retrieval . Paid search ranking: Goto (morphed into Overture.com → Yahoo!) CS276 . Your search ranking depended on how much you Informaon Retrieval and Web Search paid Pandu Nayak and Prabhakar Raghavan . Aucon for keywords: casino was expensive! Lecture 15: Web search basics 2 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Brief (non‐technical) history . 1998+: Link‐based ranking pioneered by Google . Blew away all early engines save Inktomi . Great user experience in search of a business model . Meanwhile Goto/Overture’s annual revenues were nearing $1 billion Paid . Result: Google added paid search “ads” to the side, Search Ads independent of search results . Yahoo followed suit, acquiring Overture (for paid placement) and Inktomi (for search) . 2005+: Google gains search share, dominang in Europe and very strong in North America . 2009: Yahoo! and Microso propose combined paid search offering Algorithmic results. 3 4 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.4.1 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.4.1 Web search basics User Needs . Need [Brod02, RL04] User . Informaonal – want to learn about something (~40% / 65%) . Navigaonal – want to go to that page (~25% / 15%) Web spider . Transaconal – want to do something (web‐mediated) (~35% / 20%) . Access a service . Downloads Search . Shop Indexer . Gray areas . Find a good hub . Exploratory search “see what’s there” The Web Indexes Ad indexes5 6 1 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Introducon to Informaon Retrieval How far do people look for results? Users’ empirical evaluaon of results . Quality of pages varies widely . Relevance is not enough . Other desirable qualies (non IR!!) . Content: Trustworthy, diverse, non‐duplicated, well maintained . Web readability: display correctly & fast . No annoyances: pop‐ups, etc. Precision vs. recall . On the web, recall seldom maers . What maers . Precision at 1? Precision above the fold? . Comprehensiveness – must be able to deal with obscure queries . Recall maers when the number of matches is very small . User percepons may be unscienfic, but are significant over a large aggregate (Source: iprospect.com WhitePaper_2006_SearchEngineUserBehavior.pdf) 7 8 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.2 Users’ empirical evaluaon of engines The Web document collecon . Relevance and validity of results . No design/co‐ordinaon . UI – Simple, no cluer, error tolerant . Distributed content creaon, linking, democrazaon of publishing . Trust – Results are objecve . Content includes truth, lies, obsolete . Coverage of topics for polysemic queries informaon, contradicons … . Pre/Post process tools provided . Unstructured (text, html, …), semi‐ . Migate user errors (auto spell check, search assist,…) structured (XML, annotated photos), . Explicit: Search within results, more like this, refine ... structured (Databases)… . Ancipave: related searches . Scale much larger than previous text . Deal with idiosyncrasies collecons … but corporate records are catching up . Web specific vocabulary . Impact on stemming, spell‐check, etc. Growth – slowed down from inial The Web “volume doubling every few months” but . Web addresses typed in the search box sll expanding . “The first, the last, the best and the worst …” . Content can be dynamically generated 9 10 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.2.2 The trouble with paid search ads … . It costs money. What’s the alternave? . Search Engine Opmizaon: . “Tuning” your web page to rank highly in the algorithmic search results for select keywords . Alternave to paying for placement . Thus, intrinsically a markeng funcon SPAM . Performed by companies, webmasters and (SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION) consultants (“Search engine opmizers”) for their clients . Some perfectly legimate, some very shady 11 12 2 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.2.2 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.2.2 Search engine opmizaon (Spam) Simplest forms . Moves . First generaon engines relied heavily on /idf . Commercial, polical, religious, lobbies . The top‐ranked pages for the query maui resort were the . Promoon funded by adversing budget ones containing the most maui’s and resort’s . Operators SEOs responded with dense repeons of chosen terms . e.g., maui resort maui resort maui resort . Contractors (Search Engine Opmizers) for lobbies, companies . Oen, the repeons would be in the same color as the . Web masters background of the web page . Hosng services . Repeated terms got indexed by crawlers . Forums . But not visible to humans on browsers . E.g., Web master world ( www.webmasterworld.com ) . Search engine specific tricks . Discussions about academic papers Pure word density cannot be trusted as an IR signal 13 14 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.2.2 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.2.2 variants of keyword stuffing Cloaking . Misleading meta‐tags, excessive repeon . Serve fake content to search engine spider . Hidden text with colors, style sheet tricks, etc. DNS cloaking: Switch IP address. Impersonate SPAM Meta-Tags = N Is this a Search “… London hotels, hotel, holiday inn, hilton, discount, Engine spider? booking, reservation, sex, mp3, britney spears, viagra, …” Y Real Cloaking Doc 15 16 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.2.2 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval More spam techniques The war against spam . Quality signals ‐ Prefer . Spam recognion by . Doorway pages authoritave pages based machine learning . Pages opmized for a single keyword that re‐direct to the on: . Training set based on known spam real target page . votes from authors (linkage signals) . Family friendly filters . Link spamming . votes from users (usage signals) . Linguisc analysis, general . classificaon techniques, etc. Mutual admiraon sociees, hidden links, awards – more . Policing of URL submissions . For images: flesh tone on these later . An robot test detectors, source text analysis, etc. Domain flooding: numerous domains that point or re‐ . Limits on meta‐keywords direct to a target page . Editorial intervenon . Robust link analysis . Blacklists . Robots . Ignore stascally implausible . Top queries audited . Fake query stream – rank checking programs linkage (or text) . Complaints addressed . Use link analysis to detect . Suspect paern detecon . “Curve‐fit” ranking programs of search engines spammers (guilt by associaon) . Millions of submissions via Add‐Url 17 18 3 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Introducon to Informaon Retrieval More on spam . Web search engines have policies on SEO pracces they tolerate/block . hp://help.yahoo.com/help/us/ysearch/index.html . hp://www.google.com/intl/en/webmasters/ . Adversarial IR: the unending (technical) bale between SEO’s and web search engines . Research hp://airweb.cse.lehigh.edu/ SIZE OF THE WEB 19 20 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.5 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.5 What is the size of the web ? What can we aempt to measure? . Issues .The relave sizes of search engines . The web is really infinite . Dynamic content, e.g., calendars . The noon of a page being indexed is sll reasonably well . So 404: www.yahoo.com/<anything> is a valid page defined. Stac web contains syntacc duplicaon, mostly due to . Already there are problems mirroring (~30%) . Document extension: e.g., engines index pages not yet crawled, by . Some servers are seldom connected indexing anchortext. Document restricon: All engines restrict what is indexed (first n . Who cares? words, only relevant words, etc.) . Media, and consequently the user . Engine design . Engine crawl policy. Impact on recall. 21 22 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.5 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.5 Relave Size from Overlap New definion? Given two engines A and B . The stacally indexable web is whatever search Sample URLs randomly from A engines index. Check if contained in B and vice . IQ is whatever the IQ tests measure. versa . Different engines have different preferences A ∩ B . max url depth, max count/host, an‐spam rules, priority A ∩ B = (1/2) * Size A rules, etc. A ∩ B = (1/6) * Size B . Different engines index different things under the (1/2)*Size A = (1/6)*Size B same URL: . frames, meta‐keywords, document restricons, document ∴ Size A / Size B = extensions, ... (1/6)/(1/2) = 1/3 23 Each test involves: (i) Sampling (ii) Checking 24 4 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.5 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.5 Sampling URLs Stascal methods Ideal strategy: Generate a random URL and check for . Approach 1 containment in each index. Random queries . Random searches Problem: Random URLs are hard to find! Enough to . Approach 2 generate a random URL contained in a given Engine. Random IP addresses Approach 1: Generate a random URL contained in a . Random walks given engine Suffices for the esmaon of relave size Approach 2: Random walks / IP addresses In theory: might give us a true esmate of the size of the web (as opposed to just relave sizes of indexes) 25 26 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.5 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.5 Query Based Checking Random URLs from random queries . Generate random query: how? . Strong Query to check whether an engine B has a Not an English document D: . Lexicon: 400,000+ words from a web crawl dictionary . Download D. Get list of words.
Recommended publications
  • 60 ENTREPRENEUR in the Click by Catherine Seda
    SEARCHING FOR SALES: Nacho Hernandez knows that thinking like your customers is key to successfully marketing via search engines. 60 I ENTREPRENEUR In the Click By Catherine Seda ou can’t resist the temptation. Fixated on ample, if you type a keyword into MSN Search your computer screen, you anxiously type on Microsoft’s consumer information and enter- Ykeywords relevant to your business into tainment site (www.msn.com), the Web site list- your favorite search engine. A list of search results ings displayed could be from Inktomi, Microsoft appears. You cringe as you spot several competitors, or Overture. Overture provides search results not then grumble because your company’s Web site only to MSN Search, but also to AltaVista and is nowhere to be seen. Where is it? That depends. Yahoo! Could a top site on Overture then appear Where is your search engine marketing strategy? as a top site on a distribution partner’s site? Yes. Gone are the days Unfortunately, these distribution relationships when adding keywords change frequently, making it difficult to deter- want all the right people to in meta tags to your mine exactly where results come from. site produced rankings. The challenging part, however, is figuring out how notice your business? then you Search engine marketing to land a top position in the search engines. There has evolved into a com- are two complementary yet completely different plex and competitive types of methods: optimization and advertising. need to make the most of today’s program. It’s also prof- Search engine optimization (SEO) refers to en- itable—according to a hancing your Web site design to make it more ap- March 2003 report by pealing to crawler-based search engines.
    [Show full text]
  • CLAYTON KILE, on Behalf of Himself : and All Others Similarly Situated, : : Plaintiff, : : : MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : CLAYTON KILE, on Behalf of Himself : And All Others Similarly Situated, : : Plaintiff, : : : MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. and : HENRY BLODGET, : Defendants. : : : Plaintiff Clayton Kile (APlaintiff@) alleges the following based upon the investigation of counsel, which included a review of United States Securities and Exchange Commission (ASEC@) filings by CMGI (the ACompany@), Lycos, Inc. (ALycos@ or ALCOS@) and uBid, Inc. (AuBid@), as well as regulatory filings and reports, securities analysts= reports and advisories about CMGI, Lycos and uBid issued by Merrill Lynch & Co. (AMerrill Lynch@), press releases and other public statements issued by Merrill Lynch, and media reports about CMGI, Lycos and uBid. Plaintiff believes that substantial additional evidentiary support will exist for the allegations set forth herein after a reasonable opportunity for discovery. NATURE OF THE CLAIM 1. This is a federal securities class action brought by Plaintiff against Defendants Merrill Lynch and Henry Blodget (ABlodget@) on behalf of a class (the AClass@) consisting of all persons or entities who purchased CMGI securities from March 23, 1999 through October 6, 2000, inclusive (the AClass Period@). Plaintiff seeks to recover damages caused to the Class by Defendants= violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the AExchange Act@), Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. 1. 2. This action arises as a result of the manipulation by means of deceptive and manipulative acts, practices, devices and contrivances, of the market price of CMGI securities with the intent, purpose and effect of creating and maintaining artificially high market prices.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on the Web Portal Industry
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by KDI School Archives A STUDY ON THE WEB PORTAL INDUSTRY: By Chan-Soo Park THESIS Submitted to School of Public Policy and Management, KDI In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF STRATEGY & GLOBAL MANAGEMENT Department of Strategy & International Management 2000 A STUDY ON THE WEB PORTAL INDUSTRY: By Chan-Soo Park THESIS Submitted to School of Public Policy and Management, KDI In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF STRATEGY & GLOBAL MANAGEMENT Department of Strategy & International Management 2000 Professor Seung-Joo Lee 1 ABSTRACT A STUDY ON THE WEB PORTAL INDUSTRY By Chan –Soo Park A portal is a site on the Internet that provides a one-stop experience for Internet users, allowing them to check e-mail, search the Web, and get personalized news and stock quotes. Since 1998, the “portal” has been considered the most successful Internet business model. Portal sites have characteristics such as community facilitated by services, revenue that relies on advertising, a highly competitive market, heavy traffic, and an uncertain business. The world wide portal industry is like a battle zone for America’s top three, broad-based and vertical portals. The Web portal industry is dominated by the “top three portals,” which are AOL, Yahoo and MSN, and “vertical portals” such as Go Network and NBC. The broad-based portals --Lycos, Excite@home, AltaVista and Infoseek—do not lag far behind as major competitors. Many challenges face the three key players and broad-based portals.
    [Show full text]
  • INSIDE MICROSOFT (Part 2) 2/7/04 2:30 PM
    07/15/96 INSIDE MICROSOFT (Part 2) 2/7/04 2:30 PM INSIDE MICROSOFT (Part 2) The untold story of how the Internet forced Bill Gates to reverse course (Continued from Part 1) BABY STEPS. In one breakout group, Allard tangled with Russell Siegelman, who was heading Marvel, the code name for what's now the Microsoft Network online service. Allard argued that instead of being proprietary, Marvel should be based on Web standards. Siegelman held his ground--and won. It was a decision that would later cost millions to reverse. Still, Net progress was made: TCP/IP would be integrated into Win95 and Windows NT, the version of Windows that runs network-server computers. The sales team was told to use the Web to dispense marketing information. The applications group agreed to give Word, the word-processing program, the ability to create Web pages. Next, Gates jumped deeper into the process by devoting much of his April Think Week--a semiannual retreat--to the Internet. His Apr. 16 memo, ``Internet Strategy and Technical Goals,'' contained the first signs of a growing corporate commitment. ``We want to and will invest resources to be a leader in Internet support,'' wrote Gates. It was a first step, albeit a measured one. ``I don't think he knew how much to bet yet,'' says Allard. But board member David F. Marquardt did: He recalls that he was ``amazed'' that Microsoft was putting so little into the Net. ``They weren't in Silicon Valley. When you're here, you feel it all around you,'' says Marquardt, a general partner at Technology Venture Investors in Menlo Park, Calif.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Guide to Launching Your High-Tech Business
    Forward The complete Guide to launching your High-tech Business Inside you will find: ❒ Making your Fortune ❒ Launching your Start-up ❒ Business on the Internet ❒ Financial Management for Small Business ❒ Law for Small Business ❒ Marketing for Start-ups ❒ Sources of Help and Advice Philip Treleaven High-tech Start-up Guide © Philip Treleaven 1999 Forward ii Philip Treleaven1999 Preface This book is dedicated to young high-tech Entrepreneurs - especially students - to helping you become the next Richard Branson or Bill Gates. High-tech Start-ups are different. They are built on the idea of working like crazy for two to three years and then going public or selling out for a vast amount of money. In the United States, staring your own high-tech company is part of the American dream. Bill Gates of Microsoft, Michael Dell of Dell Computers, Marc Andreessen of Netscape, and Jerry Yang of Yahoo are role models who have become enormously wealthy at a very early age. They have also helped revitalise America. They have produced global products and services like Windows and Yahoo that have literally changed the world. And, more importantly, they have created jobs for millions of people. Opportunities abound in the Internet revolution and the coming digital media revolution of interactive television. This is not just an American dream, young people in Europe and Asia are also starting high-tech companies. It is a global competition for new ideas, money and jobs. Today, the 'job for life' and the 'student grant' are rapidly becoming history. So turning necessity into a virtue, more and more young people are starting high-tech companies and working their way through college.
    [Show full text]
  • What Should Google Do? OO Page 2
    OO page 1 What Should Google Do? OO page 2 What Should Google Do? An eBook of Public Brainstorms Edited by Seth Godin Organized by Ramit Sethi Feel Free to Forward This or Post It, but Please Don’t Sell ©2003, Do You Zoom, Inc. You can click on every page. OO page 3 What Should Google Do? It seems like a simple enough question. The extraordinary thing is how many people want to answer it. Unlike almost any other brand I can think of, this one excites real passion. I wore my Google t shirt (a gift from my friend Wes at Google) to the greenmarket in New York last week. No less than five people walked up to me and, without prompting, started a conversation about how much they loved Google. A tomato salesperson grabbed me by the arm, looked me right in the eye and said, “Google changed my life for the better. Google opened doors for me that I didn’t know existed. Google is my friend. No, [and then she raised her voice a few notches] Google is my BEST FRIEND.” Wow. That’s quite a responsibility. It seems as though her best friend is about to reach a turning point. Google has triumphed as almost no other web site (in fact, as almost no other company) has ever done before. Within just a few years, with almost no money spent on marketing, they completely dominate the surfing patterns of the OO page 4 entire world. Just about everyone visits Google sooner or later during a typical day online.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Debate Research Rich Edwards, Baylor University 2012
    Internet Debate Research Rich Edwards, Baylor University 2012 Terms Internet Provider: The commercial service used to establish a connection to the Internet. Examples of a service provider are America Online, Sprint, ATT, MSN, Road Runner, etc. Internet Browser: The software used to manipulate information on the Internet. The four major browsers in use are Chrome (the Google product), Mozilla Firefox (the successor to Netscape), Safari (the Apple product) and Internet Explorer (the Microsoft product). Each type of browser will give you access to the same group of search engines, which is the main thing you will care about. Firefox has one feature that other browsers lack: it can report to you the last revision date of a Web page (select “Page Info” from the top “Tools” menu to access this function). I teach debaters that a Web page may be dated from the last revision date if no other date is shown on the page; Internet Explorer, Chrome and Safari offer no way to know this date. URL: This stands for Universal Resource Locator. It is the http://www.baylor.edu etc. Internet Search Engine: The software used to search for information on the Internet. You will use the same group of search engines, regardless of which browser (Explorer, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari) you may be using. Examples of search engines are Google, Bing (formerly Microsoft Live), AllTheWeb, HotBot, Teoma, InfoSeek, Yahoo, Excite, LookSmart, and AltaVista. I have described the strengths and weaknesses of the various search engines in later paragraphs. My personal favorites are Google and Bing for policy debate research and the Yahoo Directory Search for Lincoln Douglas research.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSENTING STATEMENT of COMMISSIONER ORSON SWINDLE in Privacy Online: Fair Information Practices in the Electronic Marketplace a Report to Congress
    FAIR INFORMATION PRACTICES IN THE ELECTRONIC MARKETPLACE DISSENTING STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER ORSON SWINDLE in Privacy Online: Fair Information Practices in the Electronic Marketplace A Report to Congress I dissent from this embarrassingly flawed Privacy Report and its conclusory yet sweeping legislative recommendation.1 In an unwarranted reversal of its earlier acceptance of a self-regulatory approach, a majority of the Commission recommends that Congress require all consumer-oriented commercial Web sites that collect personal identifying information from consumers to adopt government-prescribed versions of all four fair information practice principles (FIPPs): Notice, Choice, Access, and Security.2 The majority abandons a self- regulatory approach in favor of extensive government regulation, despite continued progress in self-regulation. The majority recommends that Congress give rulemaking authority to an implementing agency (presumably the Commission) to define the proposed legislative requirements with greater specificity, to expand on what constitutes reasonable access and adequate security and to examine the specific contours of the Choice requirement . (Privacy Report [PR] at 37). In some cases, the Report explains, the agency engaged in rulemaking might determine that reasonable access means no access despite the recommended statutory direction to provide access. (Id.). The Commission owes it to Congress and the public to comment more specifically on what it has in mind before it recommends legislation that requires all consumer-oriented commercial Web sites to comply with breathtakingly broad laws whose details will be filled in later during the rulemaking process. Most disturbing, the Privacy Report is devoid of any consideration of the costs of legislation in comparison to the asserted benefits of enhancing consumer confidence and 1To assist readers, a list of the topics I address is appended to my dissenting statement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth and Development of the Internet in the United States
    3 The Growth and Development of the Internet in the United States Martin Kenney Rarely does a new technology emerge that galvanizes a dramatic re- thinking of the nature of commerce. The Internet is such a technology. At this early stage, it is difficult to appreciate fully the importance of the Internet, but some speculate it might be as momentous as the arrival of the telegraph (Cohen, Delurg, and Sysmar 2000; Standage 1999). Radi- cally new communication technologies such as the Internet have mul- tiple applications and often become ubiquitous. As such, the adoption, diffusion, and development of this new technology provide an especially penetrating view of how different national innovation systems have re- sponded to and shaped the commercial possibilities inherent in the In- ternet. Of course, such an assessment for an economy as large as that of the United States is difficult. It is further complicated by the peculiar way in which communications technologies permeate and facilitate connec- tions and relationships. Often the action of such technologies is imper- ceptible to most of the actors involved and even to aggregate statistics; for example, better information transfer between customers and suppliers is not manifested in the finished good, though it is embodied in the good in terms of lower cost and/or higher quality. Given the diffuse nature and the speed of the Internet's evolution, any analysis can only be tentative. i Government and universities played vital roles in the gestation of the Internet in the pre-commercial and early commercialization phases. The apparent ease of entry encouraged many start-ups.
    [Show full text]
  • Cut Foliage Grower Volume 15, Number 4 October–December, 2000
    EXTENSION Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Editor: Robert H. Stamps Christine Taylor Waddill, Dean, Cooperative Extension Cut Foliage Grower Volume 15, Number 4 October–December, 2000 Searching for Information on the Internet Please note: In the fast 1 moving world of the Robert H. Stamps Internet, companies, web sites, addresses, The amount of information available on the Internet is immense and categories, features, etc. growing rapidly. It is estimated that there are 2 billion pages (2) on the change and come and WWW (see Table 1 - glossary) alone. Despite, or perhaps because of, this go rapidly. Therefore, plethora of knowledge, it can be frustrating trying to find information some of the information about a specific topic. Of course, the quality of the information found can contained herein may be obsolete by the time this vary from worthless to extremely useful — but that is a topic for another is published. article. Luckily there are tools that can make the job of finding the information you need easier. These are directories and search engines. In addition, there are metasearch tools that can connect to several directories and/or search engines at a time, purportedly saving you time and effort and returning a greater number of informative hits than available from a single directory or search engine (more on this later). Directories (Table 2) are classification systems created by editors. They are a hierarchal set of specific categories into which selected Web sites are placed. Yahoo, which has evolved into a Web portal (see glossary), started out and still contains a directory.
    [Show full text]
  • Way of the Ferret: Finding and Using Resources on the Internet
    W&M ScholarWorks School of Education Books School of Education 1995 Way of the Ferret: Finding and Using Resources on the Internet Judi Harris College of William & Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/educationbook Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Harris, Judi, "Way of the Ferret: Finding and Using Resources on the Internet" (1995). School of Education Books. 1. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/educationbook/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Education at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Education Books by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact scholarworks@wm.edu. DOCUMENT RESUME IR 018 778 ED 417 711 AUTHOR Harris, Judi TITLE Way of the Ferret: Finding andUsing Educational Resources on the Internet. SecondEdition. Education, Eugene, INSTITUTION International Society for Technology in OR. ISBN ISBN-1-56484-085-9 PUB DATE 1995-00-00 NOTE 291p. Education, Customer AVAILABLE FROM International Society for Technology in Service Office, 480 Charnelton Street,Eugene, OR 97401-2626; phone: 800-336-5191;World Wide Web: http://isteonline.uoregon.edu (members: $29.95,nonmembers: $26.95). PUB TYPE Books (010)-- Guides -Non-Classroom (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC12 Plus Postage. Mediated DESCRIPTORS *Computer Assisted Instruction; Computer Communication; *Educational Resources;Educational Technology; Electronic Mail;Information Sources; Instructional Materials; *Internet;Learning Activities; Telecommunications; Teleconferencing IDENTIFIERS Electronic Resources; Listservs ABSTRACT This book is designed to assist educators'exploration of the Internet and educational resourcesavailable online. An overview lists the five basic types of informationexchange possible on the Internet, and outlines five corresponding telecomputingoptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Edge Administrator's Guide Release
    Traffic Edge Administrator’s Guide Release 1.5 June 2002 Copyright Ó 1999-2002 Inktomi Corporation. All rights reserved. INKTOMI, Traffic Server, Traffic Edge, Traffic Edge Media Edition, Traffic Edge Security Edition, Media Distribution Network, MediaBridge and the tri-color cube design are trademarks and registered trademarks of Inktomi Corporation in the United States and other countries. Adobe is a registered trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated in the United States and in other countries. Apple, Macintosh, and QuickTime are trademarks or registered trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc. in the United States and in other countries. Java, Solaris, Sun, Sun Microsystems, and Ultra are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States and in other countries. SPARC is a trademark or registered trademark of SPARC International, Inc. in the United States and in other countries. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and in other countries. Microsoft, Windows, Windows NT, and Windows Media are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and in other countries. Netscape and Netscape Navigator are registered trademarks of Netscape Communications Corporation in the United States and in other countries. Pentium is a registered trademark of Intel Corporation in the United States and in other countries. RealNetworks, RealPlayer, and RealServer are trademarks or registered trademarks of RealNetworks, Inc. in the United States and in other countries. Red Hat is a registered trademark of Red Hat, Inc. in the United States and in other countries. UNIX is a registered trademark in the United States and in other countries, exclusively licensed through X/Open Company, Ltd.
    [Show full text]