Araneae, Amaurobiidae)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature. -
Nest Site Choice by the Intertidal Spider Desis Formidabilis (Araneae: Desidae) and Nest Utilisation by Its Hymenopteran Egg Parasitoid
This is a repository copy of Nest site choice by the intertidal spider Desis formidabilis (Araneae: Desidae) and nest utilisation by its hymenopteran egg parasitoid. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/139051/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Owen, CA, van Noort, S, Compton, SG orcid.org/0000-0002-1247-8058 et al. (1 more author) (2019) Nest site choice by the intertidal spider Desis formidabilis (Araneae: Desidae) and nest utilisation by its hymenopteran egg parasitoid. Ecological Entomology, 44 (1). pp. 62-70. ISSN 0307-6946 https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12675 (c) 2018, The Royal Entomological Society. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: 'Owen, CA, van Noort, S, Compton, SG, and Coetzee, JA (2018). Nest site choice by the intertidal spider Desis formidabilis (Araneae: Desidae) and nest utilisation by its hymenopteran egg parasitoid. Ecological Entomology,' which has been published in final form at [https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12675]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. -
Phylogeny of Entelegyne Spiders: Affinities of the Family Penestomidae
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55 (2010) 786–804 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny of entelegyne spiders: Affinities of the family Penestomidae (NEW RANK), generic phylogeny of Eresidae, and asymmetric rates of change in spinning organ evolution (Araneae, Araneoidea, Entelegynae) Jeremy A. Miller a,b,*, Anthea Carmichael a, Martín J. Ramírez c, Joseph C. Spagna d, Charles R. Haddad e, Milan Rˇezácˇ f, Jes Johannesen g, Jirˇí Král h, Xin-Ping Wang i, Charles E. Griswold a a Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA b Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis, Postbus 9517 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands c Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales – CONICET, Av. Angel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR Buenos Aires, Argentina d William Paterson University of New Jersey, 300 Pompton Rd., Wayne, NJ 07470, USA e Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa f Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, CZ-161 06, Prague 6-Ruzyneˇ, Czech Republic g Institut für Zoologie, Abt V Ökologie, Universität Mainz, Saarstraße 21, D-55099, Mainz, Germany h Laboratory of Arachnid Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic i College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China article info abstract Article history: Penestomine spiders were first described from females only and placed in the family Eresidae. Discovery Received 20 April 2009 of the male decades later brought surprises, especially in the morphology of the male pedipalp, which Revised 17 February 2010 features (among other things) a retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA). -
The Taxonomy and Distribution of the Spider Genus Phryganoporus Simon (Araneae: Amaurobioidea: Desidae)
© Copyright Australian Museum, 2002 Records of the Australian Museum (2002) Vol. 54: 275–292. ISSN 0067-1975 The Taxonomy and Distribution of the Spider Genus Phryganoporus Simon (Araneae: Amaurobioidea: Desidae) MICHAEL R. GRAY Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia [email protected] ABSTRACT. The widely distributed Australian desid spider genus, Phryganoporus Simon, is taxonomically reviewed and validated. Phryganoporus nigrinus is removed from synonymy with P. candidus, while Amaurobius gausapatus, P. g. occidentalis and P. tubicola are synonyms of P. candidus. The species recognised here belong to two clades, [P. candidus (L. Koch), Phryganoporus vandiemeni (Gray) n.comb.] and [P. nigrinus Simon, P. davidleei n.sp., P. melanopygus n.sp.]. These clades are distinguished by the possession of a divided or entire cribellum and genitalic characters. Distribution maps and notes on relationships are given. GRAY, MICHAEL R., 2002. The taxonomy and distribution of the spider genus Phryganoporus Simon (Araneae: Amaurobioidea: Desidae). Records of the Australian Museum 54(3): 275–292. Spiders of the genus Phryganoporus are cribellate web opportunist scavengers and predators. Most non-territorial, builders that are distributed throughout Australia. They build communal interaction (collective nest construction and webs on low vegetation and their abundant white hair cover cleaning, prey capture and feeding) took place between probably helps reduce body heating, particularly for spiders individuals below the subadult stage. Such communal occupying exposed webs in semi-arid to arid regions. interaction is probably a consequence of pheromone While the species described here are typically solitary, mediated sibling tolerance and is not regarded as true one species, P. -
Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven
Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Namadgi, ACT Bush Blitz Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven Nomenclature and taxonomy used in this report is consistent with: The Australian Faunal Directory (AFD) http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/fauna/afd/home Page 1 of 12 Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of contributors ................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Survey techniques ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Methods used at standard survey sites ................................................................... 5 2.3 Identifying the collections ......................................................................................... -
Taxonomic Notes on Amaurobius (Araneae: Amaurobiidae), Including the Description of a New Species
Zootaxa 4718 (1): 047–056 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4718.1.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5F484F4E-28C2-44E4-B646-58CBF375C4C9 Taxonomic notes on Amaurobius (Araneae: Amaurobiidae), including the description of a new species YURI M. MARUSIK1,2, S. OTTO3 & G. JAPOSHVILI4,5 1Institute for Biological Problems of the North RAS, Portovaya Str. 18, Magadan, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa 3GutsMuthsstr. 42, 04177 Leipzig, Germany. 4Institute of Entomology, Agricultural University of Georgia, Agmashenebeli Alley 13 km, 0159 Tbilisi, Georgia 5Invertebrate Research Center, Tetrtsklebi, Telavi municipality 2200, Georgia 6Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new species, Amaurobius caucasicus sp. n., is described based on the holotype male and two male paratypes from Eastern Georgia. A similar species, A. hercegovinensis Kulczyński, 1915, known only from the original description is redescribed. The taxonomic status of Amaurobius species considered as nomina dubia and species described outside the Holarctic are also assessed. Amaurobius koponeni Marusik, Ballarin & Omelko, 2012, syn. n. described from northern India is a junior synonym of A. jugorum L. Koch, 1868 and Amaurobius yanoianus Nakatsudi, 1943, syn. n. described from Micronesia is synonymised with the titanoecid species Pandava laminata (Thorell, 1878) a species known from Eastern Africa to Polynesia. Considerable size variation in A. antipovae Marusik et Kovblyuk, 2004 is briefly discussed. Key words: Aranei, Asia, Caucasus, Georgia, Kakheti, misplaced, new synonym, nomen dubium, redescription Introduction Amaurobius C.L. -
Dippenaar MARION.Qxd
The biodiversity and species composition of the spider community of Marion Island, a recent survey (Arachnida: Araneae) T.T. KHOZA, S.M. DIPPENAAR and A.S. DIPPENAAR-SCHOEMAN Khoza, T.T., S.M. Dippenaar and A.S. Dippenaar-Schoeman. 2005. The biodiversity and species composition of the spider community of Marion Island, a recent survey (Arach- nida: Araneae). Koedoe 48(2): 103–107. Pretoria. ISSN 0075-6458. Marion Island, the larger of the Prince Edward Islands, lies in the sub-Antarctic bio- geographic region in the southern Indian Ocean. From previous surveys, four spider species are known from Marion. The last survey was undertaken in 1968. During this study a survey was undertaken over a period of four weeks on the island to determine the present spider diversity and to record information about the habitat preferences and general behaviour of the species present. Three collection methods (active search, Tull- gren funnels and pitfall traps) were used, and spiders were sampled from six habitat sites. A total of 430 spiders represented by four families were collected, Myro kergue- lenesis crozetensis Enderlein, 1909 and M. paucispinosus Berland, 1947 (Desidae), Prinerigone vagans (Audouin, 1826) (Linyphiidae), Cheiracanthium furculatum Karsch, 1879 (Miturgidae) and an immature Salticidae. The miturgid and salticid are first records. Neomaso antarticus (Hickman, 1939) (Linyphiidae) was absent from sam- ples, confirming that the species might have been an erroneous record. Key words: Araneae, biodiversity, Desidae, Linyphiidae, Marion Island, Miturgidae, Salticidae, spiders. T.T. Khoza & S.M. Dippenaar, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga, 0727 Republic of South Africa; A.S. -
Amaurobiidae, Macrobuninae)
Zootaxa 3931 (3): 387–400 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3931.3.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:13BA1A35-C31A-4910-8EAC-1D840C5CAD18 Revision of Emmenomma Simon (Amaurobiidae, Macrobuninae) ALMEIDA-SILVA LINA M.1,2,3, GRISWOLD CHARLES E.1 & BRESCOVIT ANTONIO D.2 1California Academy of Sciences, Department of Entomology, 55 Music Concourse Drive, Golden Gate Park, 94118, San Francisco, USA. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2Laboratório Especial de Coleções Zoológicas - LECZ, Instituto Butantan, Avenida Vital Brazil, 1500, 05503-900, São Paulo, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3Corresponding author Abstract The genus Emmenomma is revised and now includes three species from Southern Chile, Argentina and Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas). The type species Emmenomma oculatum is redescribed and considered a senior synonym of E. beauchenicum. Emmenomma oculatum obscurum is removed from synonymy with E. oculatum, raised to the species level and redescribed; the male of this species remains unknown. A new species, Emmenomma joshuabelli sp. nov. is described. The presence of a grate shaped tapetum outside the Lycosoidea clade is described. Detailed images are provided for all known species. Key words: Chile, Spiders, Naevius, Anisacate, Tibial gland Introduction The spider genus Emmenomma was proposed by Simon (1884) based on several male and female specimens from Tierra del Fuego, Chile. Due to its atypical eye pattern, with greatly enlarged lateral eyes, and peculiar male palp, with an elbowed and flexibly attached dorsal tibial apophysis (DTA) that rests on the retrolateral side of the palp and can be easily mistaken for a RTA, Emmenomma is not easily confused with other spiders and there are no synonyms of the generic name. -
Zootaxa, Badumna Thorell, Desidae
Zootaxa 1172: 43–48 (2006) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1172 Copyright © 2006 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Discovery of the spider family Desidae (Araneae) in South China, with description of a new species of the genus Badumna Thorell, 1890 MING-SHENG ZHU1*, ZHI-SHENG ZHANG1, 2 & ZI-ZHONG YANG1, 3 1 College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Baoding Teachers College, Baoding, Hebei 071051, P. R. China 3 The Department of Biochemistry, Dali College, Dali, Yunnan 671000, P. R. China *Corresponding author Abstract A new species of the genus Badumna Thorell, 1890, from Yunnan Province, China is described under the name of B. tangae sp. nov. This is the first Desidae spider discovered and described from China. The new species is similar to B. insignis (L. Koch, 1872) occurring in Japan, Australia and New Zealand. But it differs from the latter by ALE largest; female with epigynal transverse ridge wide and triangular, copulatory ducts with three coils; male palpal tibia with a small, apico- medially placed, retrolateral ventral apophysis. Key words: cribellate spider, Indo-Australian region, Mt. Gaoligong, taxonomy Introduction The spider family Desidae was erected by Pocock (1895) for the genus Desis. But the family was ignored for a long time. Most genera were originally placed either in the Agelenidae C. L. Koch 1837 or in the Amaurobiidae Thorell 1870. Roth (1967) revalidated the family, but only the nominative genus Desis was included. Although a detailed diagnosis for the family of New Zealand was given by Forster (1970), many problems are still unresolved (Brignoli 1983; Murphy & Murphy 2000; Platnick 2005). -
Badumna Longinqua (L
10TH ANNIVERSARY ISSUE Check List the journal of biodiversity data NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 11(1): 1533, January 2015 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15560/11.1.1533 ISSN 1809-127X © 2015 Check List and Authors First records of the invasive spider Badumna longinqua (L. Koch) (Desidae) in southern Brazil with notes on the habitats and the species’ dispersion Miguel Simó1*, Álvaro Laborda1, Martín Núñez2 and Antonio D. Brescovit3 1 Sección Entomología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, CP 11400, Montevideo, Uruguay 2 Centro Universitario Rivera, Ituzaingó 667, CP 40000, Rivera, Uruguay 3 Laboratório Especial de Coleções Zoológicas, Instituto Butantan, Av. Vital Brazil, 1500, CEP 05503-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The invasive speciesBadumna longinqua and the transportation routes (highways) (Simó et al. 2011); this has family Desidae are recorded for the first time for Brazil. The allowed us to predict the presence of B. longinqua in other spiders were collected in urban habitats of two cities from the countries of South America. In this paper, we present the first state of Rio Grande do Sul in southern Brazil. Specimens and records of B. longinqua and the family Desidae in Brazil. their webs were found in public parks, window frames and in Considering the presence of this spider along highways a cemetery. The absence of this species along a national high- and in urban centers in Uruguay and Argentina, two countries way route and its dispersion in Brazil are discussed. neighboring Brazil (Simó et al. -
New and Interesting Cribellate Spiders from Abkhazia (Aranei: Amaurobiidae, Zoropsidae)
Arthropoda Selecta 13 (12): 5561 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2004 New and interesting cribellate spiders from Abkhazia (Aranei: Amaurobiidae, Zoropsidae) Íîâûå è èíòåðåñíûå êðèáåëëÿòíûå ïàóêè èç Àáõàçèè (Aranei: Amaurobiidae, Zoropsidae) Yuri M. Marusik1 & Mykola M. Kovblyuk2 Þ.Ì. Ìàðóñèê1, Í.Ì. Êîâáëþê2 ¹ Institute for Biological Problems of the North RAS, Portovaya Str. 18, Magadan, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] ¹ Èíñòèóò áèîëîãè÷åñêèõ ïðîáëåì Ñåâåðà ÄÂÎ ÐÀÍ, óë. Ïîðòîâàÿ 18, Ìàãàäàí 685000 Ðîññèÿ. ² Zoology Department, V.I. Vernadsky Taurida National University, Yaltinskaya str. 4, Simferopol, Crimea 95007 Ukraine. E-mail: [email protected] ² Òàâðè÷åñêèé íàöèîíàëüíûé óíèâåðñèòåò èì. Â.È. Âåðíàäñêîãî, êàôåäðà çîîëîãèè, óë. ßëòèíñêàÿ 4, Ñèìôåðîïîëü, Êðûì 95007 Óêðàèíà. KEY WORDS: Aranei, spiders, Abkhazia, new species, new record, Amaurobius, Zoropsis. ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: Aranei, ïàóêè, Àáõàçèÿ, íîâûé âèä, íîâàÿ íàõîäêà, Amaurobius, Zoropsis. ABSTRACT. One new species, Amaurobius anti- AMAUROBIIDAE povae sp.n. (#$) is described, and one new family, Zoropsidae (Zorospsis spinimana (Dufour, 1820) is Amaurobius C. L. Koch, 1837 reported from Abhazia, Caucasus. Two species are illustrated. Zorospsis spinimana was apparently recent- Sixty-nine species, found mainly in the Holarctic, ly introduced to Caucasus by UN observers. are considered to belong in Amaurobius [Petrunkevitch, 1958; Platnick, 2004]. Besides Holarctic Amaurobius is ÐÅÇÞÌÅ. Îïèñàí îäèí íîâûé âèä, Amaurobius known from Paraguay, Argentina, Ethiopia, India and antipovae sp.n. (#$) è îäíî íîâîå ñåìåéñòâî Micronesia. Most probably, species outside of the Hol- Zoropsidae (Zoropsis spinimana (Dufour, 1820) îòìå- arctic are misplaced. Four Amaurobius species were ÷åíî èç Àáõàçèè. Îáà âèäà èëëþñòðèðîâàíû. described from Baltic amber. Of these, only A. succini Zorospsis spinimana, ïî âñåé âèäèìîñòè áûë íåäàâ- Petrunkevitch, 1942 is properly described, and most íî èíòðîäóöèðîâàí íàáëþäàòåëÿìè ÎÎÍ. -
Spiders of Alberta: from Agelenidae to Uloboridae
Spiders of Alberta: from Agelenidae to Uloboridae Dr. Heather Proctor University of Alberta for the Edmonton Nature Club, 7 Feb 2019 (selected slides for posting; photos (c) H. Proctor unless otherwise noted) Canadian and Albertan diversity • 1477 species of spiders in 45 families known from Canada – may be up to 1800 spp. • 657 species in 28 families known from Alberta 631 of the 657 species are included here from https://www.albertaparks.ca/media/6255191/list-of-elements-ab-invertebrates-spiders.xlsx The 28 families of spiders known from Alberta • no mygalomorph spiders in AB, only araneomorph • Division Synspermiata – Pholcioidea: Pholcidae, Telemidae • Division Entelegynae – Araneoidea: Theridiidae, Araneidae, Linyphiidae, Mysmenidae, Mimetidae, Tetragnathidae – Uloboroidea: Uloboridae – Titanoecoidea: Titanoecidae – Amaurobioidea: Amaurobiidae – Desoidea: Desidae – Agelenoidea: Dictynidae, Cybaeidae, Hahniidae, Agelenidae – Lycosoidea: Oxyopidae, Thomisidae, Pisauridae, Lycosidae – Salticoidea: Salticidae, Philodromidae, Corinnidae, Eutichuridae – Anyphaenoidea: Anyphaenidae, Clubionidae – Liocranoidea: Liocranidae – Trochanteroidea: Phrurolithidae, Gnaphosidae mygalomorphs from BC, Antrodiaetus sp. Linyphiidae 261 Gnaphosidae 51 Lycosidae 50 Salticidae 45 Number of species known Dictynidae 36 from each family in Alberta Thomisidae 37 Theridiidae 36 (based on Robb Bennett’s Araneidae 32 personal list, 7 Feb 2019) Philodromidae 29 Clubionidae 17 Tetragnathidae 14 Hahniidae 10 Amaurobiidae 7 Agelenidae 6 Corinnidae 3 Phrurolithidae