DOCSLIB.ORG

Carinoma Mutabilis Phylum: Nemertea Class: Anopla Order: Paleonemertea a Ribbon Worm Family: Carinomidae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Carinoma Mutabilis Phylum: Nemertea Class: Anopla Order: Paleonemertea a Ribbon Worm Family: Carinomidae Phylum: Nemertea Carinoma mutabilis Class: Anopla Order: Paleonemertea A ribbon worm Family: Carinomidae Taxonomy: Originally described as cephalic grooves (order Carinoma griffini by Griffin (1898), this Paleonemertea). species was re-described by Coe (1904) as Trunk: Carinoma mutabilis. Initially, two varieties Posterior: No caudal cirrus. were described (C. mutabilis argillina and C. Eyes/Eyespots: No ocelli. mutabilis vasculosa) based on size and degree of muscle development but these Mouth: Just behind brain (class Anopla). differences were determined to be Proboscis: Eversible (phylum Nemertea) intraspecific variation (Gibson 1995). and, when not everted, coiled inside rhynchocoel (cavity). No stylets and Description proboscis pore (opening to rhynchocoel) Size: Great size variation is reported for this almost terminal. species, from 2.5 to 50 cm, although few are Tube/Burrow: Individuals are commonly over 20 cm on the California coast. The surrounded by thin sandy mucous tube and largest width is 3–5 mm with average sizes worms are happiest in the lab if allowed to much less (Coe 1901, 1905; Kozloff 1974). burrow in sand. Specimens are approximately 14 cm in length and 1 mm in width when preserved (Griffin Possible Misidentifications 1898). The Genus Carinoma is small and Color: Homogeneous (no variation dorso- comprises seven described species ventrally). Anterior and head milk white, not worldwide including (Gibson 1995): C. translucent, sometimes with brownish mottling patagonia, intertidal from southern Chile (Coe 1901). Intestinal region cream or (Magellan Straits); C. patriciae, an Australian brownish where internal organs show as species found in silty sand, mud and shell transverse dark lines. Males dark yellow or mix; C. tremaphoros, intertidal and sublittoral orange, females reddish (Griffin 1898; Kozloff in sand and mud from the Atlantic and Gulf 1974) (Fig. 1). Posterior-most region white coasts; C. hamanako occurs in sand and (Griffin 1898). mudflats near Honshu, Japan (Kajihara et al. General Morphology: Soft, elongate (but not 2011); C. armandi occurs in the low intertidal stretchy) non-segmented (phylum Nemertea). and is found among polychaete tubes in the Body: Thickened and rounded anteriorly, British Isles; C. crabica from the Venezuelan slightly compressed dorso-ventrally from coast in Curaçao (Gibson 1995). behind head and very flattened posteriorly C. mutabilis is believed to be the (Fig. 1). Individuals tend to coil from the sides only carinomid species on the Pacific coast, posteriorly (Coe 1905). but research suggests that there are likely Anterior: Anterior shape changes at least four other species in the genus constantly and can be rounded or Carinoma in Coos Bay, alone (2008-2014, T. elongate. Head is wider than neck Hiebert and S. Maslakova, unpublished). and not distinctly marked from the Differentiating these five species based on body (Coe 1901). When crawling, morphology alone is currently very head is narrower than body with slight challenging. One local heteronemertean, narrowing at neck (Griffin 1898). No which might cause confusion is Baseodiscus punnetti which has many very Hiebert, T.C. 2015. Carinoma mutabilis. In: Oregon Estuarine Invertebrates: Rudys' Illustrated Guide to Common Species, 3rd ed. T.C. Hiebert, B.A. Butler and A.L. Shanks (eds.). University of Oregon Libraries and Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, Charleston, OR. A publication of the University of Oregon Libraries and the Oregon Institute of Marine Biology Individual species: http://hdl.handle.net/1794/12647 and full 3rd edition: http://hdl.handle.net/1794/18839 Email corrections to: [email protected] minute eyespots, and slight, oblique mutabilis larvae from ripe adults collected in cephalic grooves. Although both species January and February (Friday Harbor, WA) flatten posteriorly, they can be differentiated have been reared in the lab and the from one another by the fact that B. punnetti development of their protonephridia can retract its head and Carinoma cannot. documented (Bartolomaeus et al. 2014). Other palaeonemerteans that are Larva: Planktonic larvae of C. tremaphorus superficially similar to C. mutabilis are are uniformly ciliated, possess both apical tuft Carinomella lactea and Tubulanus and posterior cirrus and are 150 µm in length pellucidus. They by possess lateral or (Coe 1943; Maslakova et al. 2004a, 2004b). cerebral sensory organs (Roe et al. 2007). Larvae of the genus Carinoma are distinct in It is sometimes very difficult to having a single, mid-ventral eye that is distinguish among nemerteans without anterior to the mouth (Norenburg and Stricker dissecting them because many 2002; Maslakova et al. 2004a, 2004b; identifying characteristics are internal Bartolomaeus et al. 2014). and not visible. Ways in which the Juvenile: worms flatten, contract, and coil are Longevity: useful as aids to identification of live Growth Rate: specimens. Food: A predator, C. mutabilis captures prey with its sticky, eversible proboscis. Ecological Information Predators: Range: Described by Griffin from specimens Behavior: collected in Puget Sound, Washington (Griffin 1898). Known range includes the pacific Bibliography coast of North America, from British Columbia to Gulf of California (Gibson 1995). 1. BARTOLOMAEUS, T., S. Local Distribution: Coos Bay sites include MASLAKOVA, and J. VON DOHREN. South Slough, Pony Slough and North Spit. 2014. Protonephridia in the larvae of Habitat: Most commonly encountered in the paleonemertean species Carinoma sand and sandy mud. Also found in clay mutabilis (Carinomidae, Nemertea) (Haderlie 1975) and amongst wharf pilings and Cephalothrix (Procephalothrix) (Griffin 1898). filiformis (Cephalothricidae, Salinity: Estuarine. Nemertea). Zoomorphology. 133:43- Temperature: Latitudinal range would 57. indicate a wide temperature tolerance. 2. COE, W. R. 1901. Papers from the Tidal Level: Intertidal and below (to 40 m) Harriman Alaska Expedition xx. The (Corrêa 1964). Nemerteans. Proceedings of the Associates: Washington Academy. iii:pp. 1-110. Abundance: Regularly encountered in South 3. COE, W. R. 1905. Nemerteans of the Slough, common in San Pedro Harbor, west and northwest coasts of America. California but less abundant in San Diego, Museum of Comparative Zoology, California (Coe 1905). Cambridge, MA. 4. —. 1943. Biology of the nemerteans of Life-History Information the Atlantic coast of North America. Reproduction: Sexually mature in August Transactions of the Connecticut (California and Puget Sound, Coe 1901, Academy of Arts and Sciences. 1905). Dioecious (separate sexes), with many 35:129-328. gametes released at once. Fertilization occurs 5. CORRÊA, D. D. 1964. Nemerteans in the water column. Development has been from California and Oregon. described for C. tremaphorus where eggs are Proceedings of the California 90–110 µm and surrounded by a chorion Academy of Sciences (series 4). (Maslakova et al. 2004a, 2004b). Carinoma 31:515-558. Hiebert, T.C. 2015. Carinoma mutabilis. In: Oregon Estuarine Invertebrates: Rudys' Illustrated Guide to Common Species, 3rd ed. T.C. Hiebert, B.A. Butler and A.L. Shanks (eds.). University of Oregon Libraries and Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, Charleston, OR. 6. GIBSON, R. 1995. Nemertean genera and species of the world: an annotated checklist of original names and description citation, synonyms, current taxonomic status, habitats and recorded zoogeographic distribution. Journal of Natural History. 29:271-562. 7. GRIFFIN, B. B. 1898. Description of some marine nemerteans of Puget Sound and Alaska. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. xi:pp. 193- 218. 8. HADERLIE, E. C. 1975. Phylum Nemertea (Rhynchocoela), p. 112- 120. In: Light's manual; intertidal invertebrates of the central California coast. S. F. Light, R. I. Smith, and J. T. Carlton (eds.). University of California Press, Berkeley. 9. KAJIHARA, H., H. YAMASAKI, and S. ANDRADE. 2011. Carinoma hamanako sp. nov.(Nemertea: Palaeonemertea), the first representative of the genus from the northwest Pacific. Species Diversity. 16:149-165. 10. KOZLOFF, E. N. 1974. Keys to the marine invertebrates of Puget Sound, the San Juan Archipelago, and adjacent Regions. University of Washington Press, Seattle. 11. MASLAKOVA, S., and J. NORENBURG. 2001. Trochophore larva is plesiomorphic for nemerteans: evidence for prototroch in a basal nemertean Carinoma tremaphoros (Phylum Nemertea, Palaeonemertea). American Zoologist. 41: 1515-1516. 12. MASLAKOVA, S. A., M. Q. MARTINDALE, and J. L. NORENBURG. 2004. Vestigial prototroch in a basal nemertean, Carinoma tremaphoros (Nemertea; Palaeonemertea). Evolution & Development. 6:219-226. 13. ROE, P., J. L. NORENBURG, and S. MASLAKOVA. 2007. Nemertea, p. 221-233. In: Light and Smith manual: intertidal invertebrates from central California to Oregon. J. Carlton (ed.). University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. A publication of the University of Oregon Libraries and the Oregon Institute of Marine Biology Individual species: http://hdl.handle.net/1794/12647 and full 3rd edition: http://hdl.handle.net/1794/18839 Email corrections to: [email protected] .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and "Aschelminthes" - A
    BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol. III - Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and "Aschelminthes" - A. Schmidt-Rhaesa PLATYHELMINTHES, NEMERTEA, AND “ASCHELMINTHES” A. Schmidt-Rhaesa University of Bielefeld, Germany Keywords: Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, Gnathifera, Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, Rotifera, Acanthocephala, Cycliophora, Nemathelminthes, Gastrotricha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera Contents 1. Introduction 2. General Morphology 3. Platyhelminthes, the Flatworms 4. Nemertea (Nemertini), the Ribbon Worms 5. “Aschelminthes” 5.1. Gnathifera 5.1.1. Gnathostomulida 5.1.2. Micrognathozoa (Limnognathia maerski) 5.1.3. Rotifera 5.1.4. Acanthocephala 5.1.5. Cycliophora (Symbion pandora) 5.2. Nemathelminthes 5.2.1. Gastrotricha 5.2.2. Nematoda, the Roundworms 5.2.3. Nematomorpha, the Horsehair Worms 5.2.4. Priapulida 5.2.5. Kinorhyncha 5.2.6. Loricifera Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary UNESCO – EOLSS This chapter provides information on several basal bilaterian groups: flatworms, nemerteans, Gnathifera,SAMPLE and Nemathelminthes. CHAPTERS These include species-rich taxa such as Nematoda and Platyhelminthes, and as taxa with few or even only one species, such as Micrognathozoa (Limnognathia maerski) and Cycliophora (Symbion pandora). All Acanthocephala and subgroups of Platyhelminthes and Nematoda, are parasites that often exhibit complex life cycles. Most of the taxa described are marine, but some have also invaded freshwater or the terrestrial environment. “Aschelminthes” are not a natural group, instead, two taxa have been recognized that were earlier summarized under this name. Gnathifera include taxa with a conspicuous jaw apparatus such as Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, and Rotifera. Although they do not possess a jaw apparatus, Acanthocephala also belong to Gnathifera due to their epidermal structure. ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Nemertean Taxonomy—Implementing Changes in the Higher Ranks, Dismissing Anopla and Enopla
    Received: 27 August 2018 | Accepted: 28 August 2018 DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12317 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Nemertean taxonomy—Implementing changes in the higher ranks, dismissing Anopla and Enopla Dear Editor, José E. Alfaya3 Nemertean classification has closely followed Stiasny‐ Fernando Ángel Fernández‐Álvarez4 Wijnhoff’s scheme (1936) that was based on Schultze’s Håkan S Andersson5 (1851) division of the taxon into the two classes Anopla and Sonia C. S. Andrade6 Enopla. In August 2018, the 9th International Conference of Thomas Bartolomaeus7 Nemertean Biology took place in the Wadden Sea Station of Patrick Beckers7 the Alfred Wegener Institute in List auf Sylt, Germany. At Gregorio Bigatti3 this meeting, the community reached consensus to revise ne- Irina Cherneva8 mertean taxonomy at the class level, based on the compiled Alexey Chernyshev9,10 evidence from studies on nemertean systematics published Brian M. Chung11 in the last 15 years (Andrade et al., 2014, 2012 ; Thollesson Jörn von Döhren7 & Norenburg, 2003). Previous classifications (e.g., Stiasny‐ Gonzalo Giribet12 Wijnhoff, 1936) are not based on phylogenetic grounds, and Jaime Gonzalez‐Cueto13 the use of these names is therefore nowadays not wholly in- Alfonso Herrera‐Bachiller14 formative. With the purpose of facilitating the practical use Terra Hiebert15 of the nemertean taxonomy and also making nemertean tax- Natsumi Hookabe16 onomy reflect a wealth of more recent information, we con- Juan Junoy14 clude that the ranks Anopla and Enopla should be eliminated Hiroshi Kajihara16 with the following argumentation: “Enopla” has for long Daria Krämer7 held no more information than the name “Hoplonemertea”. Sebastian Kvist17,18 “Anopla” is paraphyletic and the name usually corresponds Timur Yu Magarlamov9 to the following traits: (a) not bearing stylet; and (b) mouth Svetlana Maslakova15 and proboscis having separate openings.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum Nemertea)
    THE BIOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS OF A NEW SPECIES OF RIBBON WORM, GENUS TUBULANUS (PHYLUM NEMERTEA) By Rebecca Kirk Ritger Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science In Biology Chair: Dr. Qiristopher'Tudge m Dr.David C r. Jon L. Norenburg Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences JuK4£ __________ Date 2004 American University Washington, D.C. 20016 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 1 1 0 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1421360 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ® UMI UMI Microform 1421360 Copyright 2004 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE BIOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS OF A NEW SPECIES OF RIBBON WORM, GENUS TUBULANUS (PHYLUM NEMERTEA) By Rebecca Kirk Ritger ABSTRACT Most nemerteans are studied from poorly preserved museum specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Reconstruction of the Nervous and Muscular System Of
    Kerbl et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2015) 15:277 DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0531-x RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Detailed reconstruction of the nervous and muscular system of Lobatocerebridae with an evaluation of its annelid affinity Alexandra Kerbl1, Nicolas Bekkouche1, Wolfgang Sterrer2 and Katrine Worsaae1* Abstract Background: The microscopic worm group Lobatocerebridae has been regarded a ‘problematicum’, with the systematic relationship being highly debated until a recent phylogenomic study placed them within annelids (Curr Biol 25: 2000-2006, 2015). To date, a morphological comparison with other spiralian taxa lacks detailed information on the nervous and muscular system, which is here presented for Lobatocerebrum riegeri n. sp. based on immunohistochemistry and confocal laser scanning microscopy, supported by TEM and live observations. Results: The musculature is organized as a grid of longitudinal muscles and transverse muscular ring complexes in the trunk. The rostrum is supplied by longitudinal muscles and only a few transverse muscles. The intraepidermal central nervous system consists of a big, multi-lobed brain, nine major nerve bundles extending anteriorly into the rostrum and two lateral and one median cord extending posteriorly to the anus, connected by five commissures. The glandular epidermis has at least three types of mucus secreting glands and one type of adhesive unicellular glands. Conclusions: No exclusive “annelid characters” could be found in the neuromuscular system of Lobatocerebridae, except for perhaps the mid-ventral nerve. However, none of the observed structures disputes its position within this group. The neuromuscular and glandular system of L. riegeri n. sp. shows similarities to those of meiofaunal annelids such as Dinophilidae and Protodrilidae, yet likewise to Gnathostomulida and catenulid Platyhelminthes, all living in the restrictive interstitial environment among sand grains.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylum-Wide Survey Reveals Multiple Independent Gains of Head Regeneration Ability in Nemertea
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/439497; this version posted October 11, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. A phylum-wide survey reveals multiple independent gains of head regeneration ability in Nemertea Eduardo E. Zattara1,2,5, Fernando A. Fernández-Álvarez3, Terra C. Hiebert4, Alexandra E. Bely2 and Jon L. Norenburg1 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA 2 Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA 3 Institut de Ciències del Mar, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Barcelona, Spain 4 Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA 5 INIBIOMA, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Bariloche, RN, Argentina Corresponding author: E.E. Zattara, [email protected] Abstract Animals vary widely in their ability to regenerate, suggesting that regenerative abilities have a rich evolutionary history. However, our understanding of this history remains limited because regeneration ability has only been evaluated in a tiny fraction of species. Available comparative regeneration studies have identified losses of regenerative ability, yet clear documentation of gains is lacking. We surveyed regenerative ability in 34 species spanning the phylum Nemertea, assessing the ability to regenerate heads and tails either through our own experiments or from literature reports. Our sampling included representatives of the 10 most diverse families and all three orders comprising this phylum.
    [Show full text]
  • H1.1 Open Water
    PAGE .............................................................. 392 ▼ H1.1 OPEN WATER The open-water offshore habitat covers an area of by which solar energy enters the marine ecosystem, Nova Scotia larger than the land mass, and includes similar to the layer of plants on land. The ocean H1.1 Open Water salt water in inlets, bays and estuaries. The water waters are distinctive in having fostered the origins and the organisms it supports are the primary means of life on the planet. Plate H1.1.1: Right Whale, north of Brier Island (Unit 912). Photo: BIOS Habitats Natural History of Nova Scotia, Volume I © Nova Scotia Museum of Natural History .............................................................. PAGE 393 ▼ FORMATION PLANTS Oceans are formed as part of major geological events. The plants of the open ocean are almost entirely Nova Scotia’s open-ocean habitats are part of the microscopic algae, collectively known as phyto- Atlantic Ocean, which opened during the Jurassic plankton. Many different species occur, including Period and has been in continuous existence ever representatives of the prochlorophytes (blue-green since. The quality and depth of the water column algae—evolutionary intermediates between bacteria have fluctuated in relation to post-glacial climatic and algae), diatoms, dinoflagellates, chrysomonads, conditions. cryptomonads, minute flagellates and unicellular reproductive stages of macroscopic algae. Phyto- H1.1 PHYSICAL ASPECTS plankton are often grouped in size classes: Open Water 1. Water conditions, such as salinity, temperature, macroplankton: 200–2000 micrometres, includes ice-formation, turbidity, light penetration, tides larger diatoms. and currents, are extremely variable in the microplankton: 20–200 micrometres, includes waters offshore. most diatoms. 2. Air-water interaction, surface-water turbulence nanoplankton: 2–20 micrometres, includes determines the level of wave and gas exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Tubulanus Polymorphus Class: Anopla Order: Paleonemertea an Orange Ribbon Worm Family: Tubulanidae
    Phylum: Nemertea Tubulanus polymorphus Class: Anopla Order: Paleonemertea An orange ribbon worm Family: Tubulanidae “Such a worm when seen crawling in long and Palaeonemertea) but with lateral graceful curves over the bottom in clear water transverse grooves (Fig. 2a, b, c). earns for itself a place among the most Head cannot completely withdraw into body (Kozloff 1974). beautiful of all marine invertebrates” (Coe Posterior: No caudal cirrus. 1905) Eyes/Eyespots: None. Mouth: A long slit-like opening (Fig. 2c) Taxonomy: Tubulanus polymorphous was a posterior to the brain, separate from name assigned in unpublished work by proboscis pore (Fig. 2c) and positioned just Renier (1804). The genera Tubulanus and behind transverse furrows (Coe 1901). Carinella were described by Renier (1804) Proboscis: Eversible (phylum Nemertea) and Johnston (1833), respectively, and were and, when not everted, coiled inside synonymized by Bürger in 1904 (Gibson rhynchocoel (cavity). The proboscis in 1995). Melville (1986) and the International Tubulanus polymorphus is short with the Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) rhynchocoel reaching one third total worm determined that the family name Tubulanidae body length. Proboscis bears no stylets and take precedence over its senior subjective the proboscis pore almost terminal (Fig. 2c). synonym Carinellidae (Ritger and Norenburg Tube/Burrow: As is true for most Tubulanus 2006) and the name Tubulanus polymorphus species, T. polymorphus individuals live in was deemed published and available (ICZN thin parchment tubes that are attached to 1988). Previous names for T. polymorphus rocks or shells and made of hardened include C. polymorpha, C. rubra and C. mucous secretions (Coe 1943). speciosa. Possible Misidentifications Description The genus Tubulanus is slender, soft, Size: A large nemertean, up to three meters extensible without ocelli or cephalic grooves when extended.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Polychaeta) Borings in Paraspirifer Bownockeri (Brachiopoda: Devonian)1
    114 A. E. ANNALA AND L. A. KAPUSTKA Vol. 83 Copyright © 1983 Ohio Acad. Sci. 003O-O95O/83/0003-O114 $2.00/0 VERMIFORICHNUS (POLYCHAETA) BORINGS IN PARASPIRIFER BOWNOCKERI (BRACHIOPODA: DEVONIAN)1 R. D. HOARE and R. L. WALDEN, Department of Geology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403 ABSTRACT. Shells of Paraspirifer bownockeri (Stewart) from the Silica Formation, Middle Devonian of northwestern Ohio, commonly contain numerous borings of a polychaete worm forming the endolithic trace fossil Vermiforichnus clarki Cameron (1969a) which can be exposed by acidizing the specimens. The borings are most abundant on the brachial valve, and their surface openings tend to be concentrated along major growth lines thence extending dominantly in the general direction of the beaks of the valves. In- festations of the polychaete occurred at 2 different time intervals as indicated by the spac- ing of the borings on 2 major growth lines with renewed shell growth between them. Growth of the host was severely reduced immediately following the infestation and in some areas damage to the mantle caused deformation in the shell of the host. OHIO J. SCI. 83 (3): 114-119, 1983 INTRODUCTION (1932) by Hoare and Steller (1967) (fig. 1), Previous interpretations of the larger as boring sponges by Kesling and Chilman borings commonly seen in the brachiopod (1975) and as "Clionoides" sp. by Steller Paraspirifer bownockeri (Stewart) from the (1965), Kesling et al. (1980) and Sparks Silica Formation in northwestern Ohio et al. (1980). These interpretations were have been alluded to as sponge borings, based on the external configuration of the Clionoides thomasi Fenton and Fenton surface opening of the boring only.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presence of Melinna Palmata (Annelida: Polychaeta) and Ensis
    Cah. Biol. Mar. (2007) 48 : 391-401 The presence of Melinna palmata (Annelida: Polychaeta) and Ensis directus (Mollusca: Bivalvia) related to sedimentary changes in the Bay of Seine (English Channel, France) Jean-Claude DAUVIN1*, Thierry RUELLET1, Eric THIEBAUT2, Franck GENTIL2, Nicolas DESROY3, Anne-Laure JANSON4, Sylvain DUHAMEL5, Jérôme JOURDE5 and Serge SIMON5 (1) Station Marine de Wimereux, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, FRE CNRS 2816 ELICO, B.P. 80, 62930 Wimereux, France. *Corresponding author: Fax: 33 3 21 99 29 01, E-mail: [email protected] (2) Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Station Biologique de Roscoff, UMR CNRS 7144, B.P. 74, 29682 Roscoff Cedex, France (3) Station IFREMER, 2 bis rue Saint-Georges, B.P. 46, 35042 Saint-Malo Cedex, France (4) Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département Milieux et Peuplements Aquatiques CNRS UMR 5178 BOME, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France (5) Cellule du Suivi du Littoral Normand, 16 quai Casimir Delavigne, 76600 Le Havre, France Abstract: Since late 1990s the annelid polychaete Melinna palmata and the mollusc bivalve Ensis directus have been collected in the eastern part of the Bay of Seine (English Channel), indicating changes in the benthic communities. Melinna palmata was never collected prior to 2002, whereas it was reported in the muddy fine sands of the western part of the Channel, along the French (e.g. Bay of Cherbourg) and southern UK (e.g. Southampton Waters) coasts. Ensis directus was first reported in 1998 and now appears to be well implanted, given the abundant population collected in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • The Snodgrass Tapes Evolution of the Arthropods Robert Evans Snodgrass Page 1 Figure 1
    The Snodgrass Tapes Evolution of the Arthropods The third of three lectures by the insect morphologist Robert Evans Snodgrass delivered to the Department of Entomology at the University of Maryland in 1960. Transcribed, assembled and annotated by Jeffrey W. Shultz Robert Evans Snodgrass Well, the subject today will be the evolution of the arthropods. But, of course, I'll have to admit to begin with that I don't really know the truth of the matter. So, judging from what facts you can get to together... I suppose at the present time that all .... evolution is accepted as a fact by all zoologists. And apparently the fundamentalists have given up trying to do anything about it. Yet it is a theory. And ... But it seems the idea of natural selection well- enough accounts for the physical evolution of animals; that is, certain genes produce the proper variations. But what bothers me about the ... about the evolution of the animals is how did the animal ever become such a com- plex assemblage of chemical substances. I've had a cold, but I guess I can talk through it. Every cell in the body, for example, has to have its own enzymes to do its work it's supposed to do. And all these activities have to be correlated and regulated by hormones, and hormones, again, are just chemical compounds. And, so, it seems to me that that's one of the problems of evolution yet is to find out how all of these chemical substances ever got together in the animal in the proper amount, in the proper places and [how they came] to do the things that they do do...
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Guide to the Planktonic Polychaete Larvae Around the Island of Helgoland (German Bight)
    HELGOL.~NDER MEERESUNTERSUCHUNGEN Helgol/inder Meeresunters. 48, 1-58 (1994) Identification guide to the planktonic polychaete larvae around the island of Helgoland (German Bight) S. Plate* & E. Husemann* * Biologische Anstalt Helgoland (Meeresstation); D-27483 Helgoland, Federal Republic of Germany ABSTRACT: The purpose of this work is to provide the means of identifying the planktonic larvae of the polychaete species appearing in the plankton around the island of Helgoland (North Sea). During a three-year survey in this area, the larvae of 54 species out of 24 families belonging to the orders Orbiniida, Spionida, Capitelhda, Phyllodocida, Oweniida, Terebelhda, Sabelhda and the former Archiannelida have been recorded. Illustrated keys to the families, genera and species are presented. To facilitate the identification, additional descriptions and information about the seasonal appearance of the species are given. INTRODUCTION More than 13 000 species of polychaetous annelids take part in the marine benthos communities worldwide. Their distribution, species composition and population density are monitored within various benthos surveys. For the North Sea, especially the German Bight and the Wadden Sea, much information about the benthic polychaete fauna is available (Caspers, 1950; Stripp, 1969; DSrjes, 1977; Rachor & Gerlach, 1978; Gillandt, 1979; Salzwedel et al., 1985; Rachor, 1990; Bosselmann, 1991; Kr6ncke, 1991). In contrast, the holoplanktonic polychaete species and the meroplanktonic polychaete larvae, which are only part of the plankton during a more or less expanded phase of their ontogenesis, have never received much attention. Meroplanktonic polychaete larvae are seldomly recorded during studies monitoring the North Sea plankton (Smidt, 1951; Giere, 1968; Fransz, 1981; Bosselmann, 1989; Belgrano et al., 1990).
    [Show full text]