DOCSLIB.ORG

Tower of London World Heritage Site Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tower of London World Heritage Site Management Plan Tower of London World Heritage Site Management Plan Published by Historic Royal Palaces © Historic Royal Palaces 2007 Historic Royal Palaces Hampton Court Palace Surrey KT8 9AU June 2007 Foreword By David Lammy MP Minister for Culture I am delighted to support this Management Plan for the Tower of London World Heritage Site. The Tower of London, founded by William the Conqueror in 1066-7, is one of the world’s most famous fortresses, and Britain’s most visited heritage site. It was built to protect and control the city and the White Tower survives largely intact from the Norman period. Architecture of almost all styles that have since flourished in England may be found within the walls. The Tower has been a fortress, a palace and a prison, and has housed the Royal Mint, the Public Records and the Royal Observatory. It was for centuries the arsenal for small arms, the predecessor of the present Royal Armouries, and has from early times guarded the Crown Jewels. Today the Tower is the key to British history for visitors who come every year from all over the world to relive the past and to enjoy the pageantry of the present. It is deservedly a World Heritage Site. The Government is accountable to UNESCO and the wider international community for the future conservation and presentation of the Tower. It is a responsibility we take seriously. The purpose of the Plan is to provide an agreed framework for long-term decision-making on the conservation and improvement of the Tower and sustaining its outstanding universal value. The Plan is the result of extended consultation between Historic Royal Places, as the organisation with responsibility for the site, and those who are responsible for, and have a special interest in, its place in the city of London. I am extremely grateful to the many bodies and individuals who have worked so hard to produce this Plan, in particular members of the Tower of London World Heritage Site Consultative Committee. I am sure that the Plan will be extremely valuable in managing the site and its setting, and in ensuring that the Tower’s special qualities are sustained and protected for future generations to enjoy. Foreword By John Barnes Conservation & Learning Director, Historic Royal Palaces Historic Royal Palaces is proud to be responsible for the care, conservation and presentation to the public of the Tower of London. An independent charity that receives no public funding, we look after five of the nation’s most important sites: Hampton Court Palace, Kensington Palace, Kew Palace, the Banqueting House in Whitehall and, of course, the Tower. Our work is guided by a central Cause; to help everyone explore the story of how monarchs and people have shaped society in some of the greatest palaces ever built. The Tower of London World Heritage Site Management Plan was first put together in 2000 with the guidance of a Consultative Committee of experts and policy makers, to whom we are indebted. The Plan was widely consulted on but not finalised, because the swift change in development activity in the vicinity of the Tower highlighted the need for a review of the mechanisms to protect its setting. The publication of the London Plan spatial development strategy and subsequent supplementary guidance has provided an opportunity to strengthen the protection given to World Heritage Sites in London. The Management Plan has, therefore, been extensively updated to reflect the passage of time, the evolving planning policy framework and the greater emphasis on the setting of the Tower. This management plan brings together knowledge, expertise and enthusiasm for sustaining the outstanding universal value of the Tower from those with an interest in, and responsibility for, the Tower and its environs. Managing the Tower and its place in a dynamic World City is challenging. The Plan recognises this, and looks to address the issues and challenges, while creatively utilising the enormous opportunities that the Tower offers. The Plan provides a framework for long-term decision- making on the conservation and improvement of the Tower and I fully expect that it will provide a positive means of sustaining its outstanding universal value into the future. Contents Section Number Section Page Foreword by David Lammy MP, Minister for Culture Foreword by John Barnes, Conservation & Learning Director, Historic Royal Palaces Executive summary 3 Part A Context to the Management Plan 1.0 Introduction 6 1.1 World Heritage and the World Heritage Convention 1.2 The UK and the World Heritage Convention 1.3 The Tower of London World Heritage Site Management Plan - background 1.4 The Tower of London World Heritage Site Management Plan - today 1.5 The main aims of the Management Plan 1.6 The structure of the Management Plan 1.7 The planning status of the Management Plan 2.0 Description of the World Heritage Site 11 2.1 General information 2.2 Historical development of the Tower 2.3 The development of the capital city around the Tower 2.4 The character of the Tower in its setting 2.5 Planning and policy framework 2.6 Current management 3.0 Evaluation of the World Heritage Site 69 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Summary Statement of Significance 3.3 Statement of Significance 3.4 Justification for criteria 3.5 Statement of Outstanding Universal Value 3.6 National and local significances 3.7 Instrumental benefits Part B Managing the World Heritage Site 4.0 Opportunities, challenges and issues 86 4.1 Opportunities 4.2 Challenges and issues 5.0 The vision for the Tower of London World Heritage 94 Site 5.1 The vision for the Tower of London World Heritage Site 6.0 Management objectives 96 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Researching and understanding the Tower 6.3 Managing the setting of the Tower 6.4 Giving the Tower the care it deserves 6.5 Communicating the stories of the Tower 6.6 Valuing visitors and the resident community 6.7 Managing the Tower with our partners 6.8 Promoting the Tower’s significance 6.9 Generating the money to sustain the OUV of the Tower Part C Implementing, monitoring and reviewing the Management Plan 7.0 Mechanisms for implementation 140 8.0 Monitoring and reviewing the Management Plan 142 9.0 Programme and priorities for action 144 Bibliography I Appendices i Appendix A Prior public consultation processes Appendix B About Historic Royal Palaces Appendix C Text of the Justification for Inscription contained in the State Party’s Nomination Dossier and copy of ICOMOS evaluation Appendix D Criteria for the assessment of outstanding universal value Appendix E Scheduled Monuments and Listed Structures within the World Heritage Site Appendix F The interpretation programme at the Tower 2 Executive summary 3 Executive summary HM Royal Palace and Fortress of the Tower of London (the Tower) is one of England’s most evocative ancient monuments. There is a tangible sense of history in every tower and around every corner, making it an endlessly fascinating place for visitors from all round the world. The buildings and layout that we see today stand as the culmination of a sequence which started around 1067, and have developed dynamically ever since in line with the changing needs of the site’s occupants, users and visitors. The Tower was inscribed onto the World Heritage List in 1988. Inscribed under two of the required criteria for inscription, the justification was: Criterion (ii): A monument symbolic of royal power since the time of William the Conqueror, the Tower of London served as an outstanding model throughout the kingdom from the end of the 11th century. Like it, many keeps were built in stone, e.g. Colchester, Rochester, Hedingham, Norwich or Carisbrooke Castle on the Isle of Wight. Criterion (iv): The White Tower is the example par excellence of the royal Norman castle in the late 11th century. The ensemble of the Tower of London is a major reference for the history of medieval military architecture. The vision for the Tower of London World Heritage Site is to sustain its outstanding universal value and to effectively manage the Tower in order to protect, conserve and present it to the public and to transmit it to future generations. The purpose of the Tower of London World Heritage Site Management Plan is to ensure the effective management of the WHS for present and future generations and to provide an agreed framework for long-term decision- making on the conservation and improvement of the Tower. The Tower benefits from unique characteristics that afford opportunities for its future development. Conversely, these characteristics also raise complex issues that affect the conservation and management of the site. The Plan seeks to utilise 4 opportunities in a way that is appropriate to the Tower’s significance and work towards an optimal solution to the challenges and issues faced by the Tower. The Plan sets out management objectives for the Tower, supported by actions, which reflect the opportunities, challenges and issues. Historic Royal Palaces is the lead body responsible for implementing the Plan, in co-operation with its on-site and off-site partners. The Tower of London World Heritage Site Consultative Committee, a group including on-site partners, local authorities and heritage specialists, will provide a forum for consulting on issues affecting the Tower and its environs. The Committee will review progress on the objectives and assist in monitoring implementation of the action plan every year. The entire Plan will be reviewed every five years. 5 Part A – Context to the Management Plan 6 1.0 Introduction 1.1 World Heritage and the World Heritage Convention 1.1.1 World Heritage is the designation for places that are of ‘outstanding universal value’ (OUV) to humanity and, as such, have been inscribed on the World Heritage List to be protected for future generations to appreciate and enjoy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Post-Medieval and Modern Resource Assessment
    THE SOLENT THAMES RESEARCH FRAMEWORK RESOURCE ASSESSMENT POST-MEDIEVAL AND MODERN PERIOD (AD 1540 - ) Jill Hind April 2010 (County contributions by Vicky Basford, Owen Cambridge, Brian Giggins, David Green, David Hopkins, John Rhodes, and Chris Welch; palaeoenvironmental contribution by Mike Allen) Introduction The period from 1540 to the present encompasses a vast amount of change to society, stretching as it does from the end of the feudal medieval system to a multi-cultural, globally oriented state, which increasingly depends on the use of Information Technology. This transition has been punctuated by the protestant reformation of the 16th century, conflicts over religion and power structure, including regicide in the 17th century, the Industrial and Agricultural revolutions of the 18th and early 19th century and a series of major wars. Although land battles have not taken place on British soil since the 18th century, setting aside terrorism, civilians have become increasingly involved in these wars. The period has also seen the development of capitalism, with Britain leading the Industrial Revolution and becoming a major trading nation. Trade was followed by colonisation and by the second half of the 19th century the British Empire included vast areas across the world, despite the independence of the United States in 1783. The second half of the 20th century saw the end of imperialism. London became a centre of global importance as a result of trade and empire, but has maintained its status as a financial centre. The Solent Thames region generally is prosperous, benefiting from relative proximity to London and good communications routes. The Isle of Wight has its own particular issues, but has never been completely isolated from major events.
    [Show full text]
  • London Cries & Public Edifices
    >m ^Victoria %S COLLECTION OF VICTORIAN BOOKS AT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Victorian 914.21 L533L 1851 3 1197 22902 7856 A,AA A ,' s 7rs a' lEn! 31113 rf K* I 'r X ^i W\lf' ^ J.eU ^W^3 mmm y<i mm§ ft Hftij •: :ii v^ ANDON431IE GRMMT am &U<2<3Slg,SORS TT© KEWBgRy A.KfD HARRIS *S) A SORNER OF1 3-AjWTT PAUL'S 6HUR6H-TARD, LONDON UPB Tfffi TOWfiR QT LONDON. A POTS & KETTLES TO MERaBELLOWiS TO MEND. POTS AND KETTLES TO MEND !—COPPER OR BRASS TO MEND ! The Tinker is swinging his fire-pot to make it burn, having placed his soldering-iron in it, and is proceeding to some corner or post, there to repair the saucepan he carries.—We commence with the most in- teresting edifice in our capital, THE TOWER OF LONDON; the fortress, the palace, and prison, in which so many events, connected with the history of our country, have transpired. The building with four towers in the centre is said to have been erected by William the Conqueror, and is the oldest part of the fortress. The small bell- tower in the front of our picture is that of the church of St. Peter's, (the tower being a parish itself,) on the Tower Green, erected in the reign of Edward I. Our view is taken from Tower Hill, near which was the scaffold on which so many have fallen. To the left of the picture stood the grand storehouse of William III., destroyed by fire, Nov. 1841. The Regalia is deposited here, and exhibited to the public, as is also the Horse Armoury.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring London
    05 539175 Ch05.qxd 10/23/03 11:00 AM Page 105 5 Exploring London Dr. Samuel Johnson said, “When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life, for there is in London all that life can afford.” It would take a lifetime to explore every alley, court, street, and square in this city, and volumes to discuss them. Since you don’t have a lifetime to spend, we’ve chosen the best that London has to offer. For the first-time visitor, the question is never what to do, but what to do first. “The Top Attractions” section should help. A note about admission and open hours: In the listings below, children’s prices generally apply to those 16 and under. To qualify for a senior discount, you must be 60 or older. Students must present a student ID to get discounts, where available. In addition to closing on bank holidays, many attractions close around Christmas and New Year’s (and, in some cases, early in May), so always call ahead if you’re visiting in those seasons. All museums are closed Good Friday, from December 24 to December 26, and New Year’s Day. 1 The Top Attractions British Museum Set in scholarly Bloomsbury, this immense museum grew out of a private collection of manuscripts purchased in 1753 with the proceeds of a lottery. It grew and grew, fed by legacies, discoveries, and purchases, until it became one of the most comprehensive collections of art and artifacts in the world. It’s impossible to take in this museum in a day.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles I: the Court at War
    6TH NOVEMBER 2019 Theatres of Revolution: the Stuart Kings and the Architecture of Disruption – Charles I: The Court at War PROFESSOR SIMON THURLEY In my last lecture I described what happened when through choice or catastrophe a monarch cannot rule or live in the palaces and places designed for it. King James I subverted English courtly conventions and established a series of unusual royal residences that gave him privacy and freedom from conventional royal etiquette. Although court protocol prevailed at Royston, there was none of the grandeur that the Tudor monarchs would have expected. Indeed, from our perspective Royston was not a palace at all, just a jumble of houses in a market town. Today we turn our attention to King Charles I. In a completely different way from his father he too ended up living in places which we would hesitate to call palaces. But the difference was that he strove at every turn to maintain the magnificence and dignity due to him as sovereign. On 22 August 1642 King Charles raised his standard at Nottingham signalling the end of a stand-off with Parliament and the beginning of what became Civil War. Since the 10th January, when Charles had abandoned London, after his botched attempt to arrest five members of parliament, he had been on the move. Hastily exiting from Whitehall, he arrived late at Hampton Court which was quite unprepared to receive the royal family; it was cold and only partially furnished when Charles entered his privy lodgings. But the king’s main concern was security, not comfort, and preparations were undertaken at lightning speed for the king and queen to move to the safety of Windsor Castle.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2016/17
    Historic Royal Places – Spines Format A4 Portrait Spine Width 35mm Spine Height 297mm HRP Text 20pt (Tracked at +40) Palace Text 30pt (Tracked at -10) Icon 20mm Wide (0.5pt/0.25pt) Annual Review 2016/17 1 2 06 Welcome to another chapter in our story Contents 07 Our work is guided by four principles 08 Chairman’s Introduction 09 Chief Executive – a reflection 10 The Year of the Gardens 14 Guardianship 20 Showmanship 26 Discovery 32 Independence 38 Money matters 39 Visitor trends 40 Summarised financial statements 42 Trustees and Directors 44 Supporters 46 Acknowledgments Clockwise from top left: The White Tower, Tower of London; the West Front, Hampton Court Palace; the East Front, Kensington Palace; the South Front, Hillsborough Castle; Kew Palace; Banqueting House. 4 This year, the famous gardens of Hampton Court Palace took Guardianship: Welcome to centre stage. Already a huge attraction in their own right, this Our work is We exist for tomorrow, not just for yesterday. Our job is to give year the historic gardens burst into even more vibrant life. these palaces a future as valuable as their past. We know how another Prompted by the 300th anniversary of the birth of Lancelot guided by four precious they and their contents are, and we aim to conserve ‘Capability’ Brown, we created a spectacular programme of them to the standard they deserve: the best. chapter in exhibitions, events and activities. A highlight was the royal principles Discovery: opening of the Magic Garden; our playful and spectacular We explain the bigger picture, and then encourage people to our story 21st century contribution to 500 years of garden history.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge OCR Spec B: History Around Us
    OCR HISTORY AROUND US Site Proposal Form Example from English Heritage The Criteria The study of the selected site must focus on the relationship between the site, other historical sources and the aspects listed in a) to n) below. It is therefore essential that centres choose a site that allows learners to use its physical features, together with other historical sources as appropriate, to understand all of the following: a) The reasons for the location of the site within its surroundings b) When and why people first created the site c) The ways in which the site has changed over time d) How the site has been used throughout its history e) The diversity of activities and people associated with the site f) The reasons for changes to the site and to the way it was used g) Significant times in the site’s past: peak activity, major developments, turning points h) The significance of specific features in the physical remains at the site i) The importance of the whole site either locally or nationally, as appropriate j) The typicality of the site based on a comparison with other similar sites k) What the site reveals about everyday life, attitudes and values in particular periods of history l) How the physical remains may prompt questions about the past and how historians frame these as valid historical enquiries m) How the physical remains can inform artistic reconstructions and other interpretations of the site n) The challenges and benefits of studying the historic environment 1 Copyright © OCR 2018 Site name: STONEHENGE Created by: ENGLISH HERITAGE LEARNING TEAM Please provide an explanation of how your site meets each of the following points and include the most appropriate visual images of your site.
    [Show full text]
  • Attractions Management News 7Th August 2019 Issue
    Find great staff™ Jobs start on page 27 MANAGEMENT NEWS 7 AUGUST 2019 ISSUE 136 www.attractionsmanagement.com Universal unveils Epic Universe plans Universal has finally confirmed plans for its fourth gate in Orlando, officially announcing its Epic Universe theme park. Announced at an event held at the Orange County Convention Center in Orlando, Epic Universe will be the latest addition to Florida's lucrative theme park sector and has been touted as "an entirely new level of experience that forever changes theme park entertainment". "Our new park represents the single- largest investment Comcast has made ■■The development almost doubles in its theme park business and in Florida Universal's theme park presence in Orlando overall,” said Brian Roberts, Comcast chair and CEO. "It reflects the tremendous restaurants and more. The development excitement we have for the future of will nearly double Universal’s total our theme park business and for our available space in central Florida. entire company’s future in Florida." "Our vision for Epic Universe is While no specific details have been historic," said Tom Williams, chair and revealed about what IPs will feature in CEO for Universal Parks and Resorts. This is the single largest the park, Universal did confirm that the "It will become the most immersive and investment Comcast has made 3sq km (1.2sq m) site would feature innovative theme park we've ever created." in its theme park business an entertainment centre, hotels, shops, MORE: http://lei.sr/J5J7j_T Brian Roberts FINANCIALS NEW AUDIENCES
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage 32 COM
    World Heritage 32 COM Distribution Limited WHC-08/32.COM/8B.Add Paris, 25 June 2008 Original: English/French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty second Session Quebec City, Canada 2 – 10 July 2008 Item 8B of the Provisional Agenda: Nominations to the World Heritage List Nominations to the World Heritage List SUMMARY This Addendum presents the Draft Decisions concerning 5 nominations of properties deferred or referred back by previous sessions of the World Heritage Committee, 21 minor modifications to the boundaries and 29 revisions of Statements of Significance or Statements of Outstanding Universal Value of already inscribed properties and 1 change of criteria to be examined by the World Heritage Committee at its 32nd session in 2008. Decision required: The Committee is requested to examine the Draft Decisions presented in this Addendum and take its Decisions in accordance with paragraphs 153, 155, 163 and 164 of the Operational Guidelines. I. Changes to criteria of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List The World Heritage Committee at its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006) approved 17 changes of criteria numbering for Natural and Mixed properties inscribed for geological values before 1994 (Document WHC- 06/30.COM/8D). For only two properties (see table below), in the group of properties that was inscribed under natural criteria (ii) before 1994, was no change in criteria numbering requested at that time, as the State Party asked for further time to consult the stakeholders concerned. Following consultations with the stakeholders and IUCN, it was agreed that the criteria should be as shown in the table here below.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities
    Thomas More opportunities Square An early opportunity to participate in the transformation of Thomas More Square Thomas More Square Rubbing shoulders with the luxury yachts and ocean going cruisers berthed in St Katharine Docks, Thomas More Square is the perfect opportunity to be part of a business village well adapted for today’s key occupiers, and the next generation’s high tech business suppliers. 1 7 8 9 13 12 Thomas 3 10 More 11 15 16 Square 6 River Thames 4 2 1 5 More central 14 1 Canary Wharf 2 Wapping Station 3 Shadwell Station 4 St Katharine Docks 5 Butler’s Wharf 6 Tower of London 7 Shoreditch High Street Station 8 Spitalfields 9 Liverpool Street Station 10 Bank Station 11 Lloyd’s of London 12 Aldgate Station 13 Aldgate East Station 14 London Bridge Station 15 Tower Hill Station 16 Tower Gateway Station 2 3 More to offer View West Butler’s Wharf St Katharine Docks Tower Bridge The Shard London Eye Tower of London 20 Fenchurch Street Lloyd’s 30 St Mary Axe Heron Tower Broadgate Tower Battersea The Leadenhall Power Station Westminster Building 7 8 9 13 12 Thomas 3 10 More 11 15 16 Square 6 River Thames 4 2 1 5 central 14 1 Canary Wharf 2 Wapping Station 3 Shadwell Station 4 St Katharine Docks 5 Butler’s Wharf 6 Tower of London 7 Shoreditch High Street Station 8 Spitalfields 9 Liverpool Street Station 10 Bank Station 11 Lloyd’s of London 12 Aldgate Station 13 Aldgate East Station 14 London Bridge Station 15 Tower Hill Station 16 Tower Gateway Station 3 1 2 3 More to explore Amenities & Neighbours The Thomas More Square development provides you 4 with an opportunity to be part of a vibrant office environment with a varied and exciting mix of amenities.
    [Show full text]
  • 250 City Road
    Lifestyle GUIDE Luxury GUIDE FROM TO As a global city, London has something for everyone. It is one of the worlds most visited cities: for its history and culture, arts and fine food, the experience is unrivalled and all on your doorstep at City Road. London’s cultural dynamism attracts visitors and residents alike from every country. In 2021, London was named the rich person’s city of choice for lifestyle – for its abundance of Michelin-starred restaurants, opera houses and theatres, universities, sports and shopping facilities. London has also overtaken New York to the top spot, with the highest concentration of ‘high net worth individuals’ in the world,* making it a haven for those seeking the Z pinnacle of luxury lifestyle. In this guide, we’ve compiled some of the most prestigious places to dine, socialise, shop and enjoy life in this unique capital city, as well as their proximity to City Road. *Source: Knight Frank 2021 Wealth Report. 2 London 2021 Camden Town ESSEX ROAD Olympic Park Barnsbury Rosemary Gardens Bernhard Westfield Gardens Islington Stratford City St. John’s Wood University of the Dalston PUDDING Queen’s Arts London MILL LANE Park To Luton Airport Shoreditch Victoria Park Central St Martins Park QUEEN’S PARK Haggerston King’s Cross Park 1 ANGEL NE KING’S CROSS ZO ST PANCRAS ST PANCRAS Sadler's Wells HOXTON Maida Vale Regent’s Park INTERNATIONAL Theatre Kensal Green Clerkenwell BOW CHURCH College Park Meath BOW RD EUSTON City University Gardens London OLD STREET London Business Shoreditch Mile End University College
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Premises: Fire Safety Guidance Background
    Heritage Premises: Fire Safety Guidance Background: Important heritage buildings are listed by Historic England. Listing, scheduling, registering and protecting are all forms of Designation, for protecting buildings, monuments, parks and gardens, battlefields and wreck sites respectively. Designation is the act of identifying the most important parts of our heritage so they can receive special protection and make sure that our history can be enjoyed by present and future generations. All of these sites are brought together in the National Heritage List for England (NHLE) Buildings and structures which meet the criteria for national protection are listed. This protection system has been in place since 1947 and operates under; The Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. Guidance to selection criteria is available on Historic England`s web site: http://historicengland.org.uk/listing/selection-criteria/listing-selection/ Listed Buildings: Listing helps us acknowledge and understand our shared history. It marks and celebrates a building's special architectural and historic interest, and also brings it under the consideration of the planning system so that some thought will be taken about its future. The older a building is, the more likely it is to be listed. All buildings built before 1700 which survive in anything like their original condition are listed, as are most of those built between 1700 and 1840. Particularly careful selection is required for buildings from the period after 1945. A building has normally to be over 30 years old to be eligible for listing. Categories of listed buildings: Grade I buildings are of exceptional interest, only 2.5% of listed buildings are Grade I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Balliol That Might Have Been: Pugin's Crushing Oxford Defeat
    The Balliol That Might Have Been: Pugin's Crushing Oxford Defeat Litvack, L. (1986). The Balliol That Might Have Been: Pugin's Crushing Oxford Defeat. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 45(4), 358-373. https://doi.org/10.2307/990207 Published in: Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:08. Oct. 2021 The Balliol That Might Have Been: Pugin's Crushing Oxford Defeat Author(s): Leon B. Litvack Source: Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 45, No. 4 (Dec., 1986), pp. 358-373 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Society of Architectural Historians Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/990207 Accessed: 21-12-2017 15:53 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive.
    [Show full text]