DOCSLIB.ORG

Project: TYPE 26 FRIGATE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project: TYPE 26 FRIGATE DEPENDABLE ENGINEERING, CERTIFIED SOLUTIONS CASE STUDY 05 Project: TYPE 26 FRIGATE FROM NOVEL CONCEPT TO GUARANTEED DELIVERY: ADVANCED MATERIAL COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT FOR MARINE PROJECT For the defence company BAE BAE Systems was looking for a specific Systems Maritime - Naval Ships, partner who could bring significant structural renowned for their development of composite experience to develop the numerous Royal Navy vessels, the all structural design, as well as complement their new Type 26 Frigate was critical to in-house team with experienced professionals BAE Systems secured a fully their continued reputation and skilled in reducing the risk on the project and capable composite foremast business success. For the first time, ready to make important development at the behest of the Royal Navy, they decisions. design, with full structural were looking to develop a ship with This teamwork resulted in BAE Systems substantiation a major structural element securing a fully capable novel composite documentation to meet manufactured from composite foremast design with full structural materials. With a specific focus on Lloyds Register and MoD substantiation documentation to meet reducing the weight of the Lloyds Register and MoD requirements, as requirements, as well as superstructure, the development of well as avoiding costly and untimely mistakes the foremast was key to the project avoiding costly and untimely along the way. success. mistakes along the way. www.cascade-engineering.co.uk CASE STUDY 05 - BAE SYSTEMS TYPE 26 FRIGATE STRATEGY EXPERTISE DELIVERED This was a challenging project. Combining our Naval Architectural and Marine Stage One: Review, modify and enhance the Engineering expertise with a deep composite design of the foremast, a understanding of the design drivers and four-storey octagonal structure, 8m square at issues affecting the design of the foremast base, that contains the combat mission systems, supports the main radar at the top structure, we were able to turn an outline and various communication systems design into a well-proportioned scantling externally. plan of decks, bulkhead panels and reinforcement. This could then be optimised Following Stage One design completion, we to pass all structural requirements at the optimised the structure against improved same time as being efficient with regard to load distributions based on further iterations using FE models and structural design. weight. Comprehensive, yet concise Weight is key to all superstructure and documentation was also critical to achieving optimisation of structural requirements Stage 3 and Manufacture: Following the prompt acceptance from the classification against minimal weight was paramount to detailed structural design, we worked society for the structure. ensure the mast remained within the limits alongside a specialist Norwegian marine Project success was also dependent on mandated within the BAE Systems & Navy composite manufacturer to ensure a smooth transition from design into production and skilled, capable project management. Like requirements. subsequent assembly onto the ship. many organisations, resources in BAE Stage 2: Our sector experience meant we Systems were stretched. We brought in not only accounted for the specific drivers As the first mast passed into production, it experienced team members to work within the superstructure, but also integrated met with some teething problems. Our team alongside the BAE Systems team, the design solution with the adjacent remained on hand throughout the initial concentrating on critical programme steelwork, as well as the radar, SATCOM & production process to help resolve early issues and answer questions, working elements with minimal supervision, while combat systems, mast top bulwarks and mast sponsons. directly with the suppliers at their Norwegian following BAE Systems methods and Lloyds yard to help keep the challenging timescales Rules (Special Service Craft). Naturally, for complete programme delivery on track. working alongside the BAE Systems team, we kept a close eye on budget and quality standards as part of the brief. “Cascade Engineering built and maintained relationships with both our internal and external stakeholders, as well as with our third party supplier. This allowed everyone to gain confidence in our design and project delivery, which also helped everyone during very busy and fraught periods of working.“ Suzanne Currie, BAE Systems Project Manager & CAM - Type 26 www.cascade-engineering.co.uk CASE STUDY 05 - BAE SYSTEMS TYPE 26 FRIGATE HMS Queen Elizabeth Photo: Courtesy Royal Navy COMPREHENSIVE CASCADE ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE HALLMARKS • Involved at the heart of development programmes. • Analysis of steelwork to Lloyds Rules • Completed specific features such as • Experience on Type 45 Destroyer and for Naval Ships. yardarms, bridge wing and RAS Queen Elizabeth Class Carrier • Analysis of complete structural bulwarks, shaft bracket fairings, plus programmes. elements, such as the units, SATCOM sponsons and associated installation structures. • Providing integration between our comprising of decks, bulkheads, customer (the OEM) and its suppliers. equipment seats, penetrations and • Integration of mechanical systems, system supports. such as the radar, SATCOM • Ceaseless drive to streamline analysis & combat systems and life raft. approaches, utilising technology and data handling techniques to improve robustness and expedite any analysis to allow decision making. CASCADE • Optimisation against multiple design APPROACH drivers. • Start with concept solutions – • Ensuring teams work with the best current Naval Architecture, Stage 1 development. data. • Move to concept development – • Developing loading – ship motion and Marine Engineering, Stage 2 structural shock events, developing whole unit FE Assessments and refinement. models. • Move toward a final solution – Marine • Safety assessment, including – shock Engineering, Stage 3 assess manufacturing analysis, captivity of items, lightning strike, capabilities, production rate issues and etc. installation and assembly limitations. • Development of Means of Compliance • Preliminary and Critical Design Review strategies and evidence requirements. preparation, presentation to OEM, • Development of test plans, review of managing actions to progress beyond testing arrangements, test witnessing, review. results review, correlation of data and • Decide on clear route forward. models. • Naval Architecture and design experience/ Type 45 Destroyer capability. by Open Government Photo provided Licence. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 • Marine Engineering experience across a number of flagship programmes. Images courtesy of BAE Systems, unless otherwise attributed www.cascade-engineering.co.uk CASE STUDY 05 - BAE SYSTEMS TYPE 26 FRIGATE Cascade Engineering +44 1252 594121 Building B [email protected] Riverside Way Camberley, GU15 3YL www.cascade-engineering.co.uk DEPENDABLE ENGINEERING, www.cascade-engineering.co.ukCERTIFIED SOLUTIONS Cascade Engineering is a trading name of Cascade AerospaceCASE Engineering STUDY 04 Limited. - PILATUS Reg. No. 05838778 PC-24.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quality Versus Quantity: Lessons for Canadian Naval Renewal
    QUALITY VERSUS QUANTITY: LESSONS FOR CANADIAN NAVAL RENEWAL Commander C. R. Wood JCSP 45 PCEMI 45 Service Paper Étude militaire Disclaimer Avertissement Opinions expressed remain those of the author and do Les opinons exprimées n’engagent que leurs auteurs et not represent Department of National Defence or ne reflètent aucunement des politiques du Ministère de Canadian Forces policy. This paper may not be used la Défense nationale ou des Forces canadiennes. Ce without written permission. papier ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation écrite © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, représentée par le Minister of National Defence, 2019. ministre de la Défense nationale, 2019. CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE/COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES JCSP 45/PCEMI 45 15 OCT 2018 DS545 COMPONENT CAPABILITIES QUALITY VERSUS QUANTITY: LESSONS FOR CANADIAN NAVAL RENEWAL By Commander C. R. Wood Royal Navy “This paper was written by a candidate « La présente étude a été rédigée par un attending the Canadian Forces College in stagiaire du Collège des Forces canadiennes fulfillment of one of the requirements of the pour satisfaire à l’une des exigences du Course of Studies. The paper is a scholastic cours. L’étude est un document qui se document, and thus contains facts and rapporte au cours et contient donc des faits opinions which the author alone considered et des opinions que seul l’auteur considère appropriate and correct for the subject. It appropriés et convenables au sujet. Elle ne does not necessarily reflect the policy or the reflète pas nécessairement la politique ou opinion of any agency, including the l’opinion d’un organisme quelconque, y Government of Canada and the Canadian compris le gouvernement du Canada et le Department of National Defence.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy News Week 35-2
    NAVY NEWS WEEK 35-2 27 August 2018 Russia debates giving up on building helicopter-carrier ships for its Navy Meduza 14:48, 20 august 2018 There‟s some confusion in Russia‟s shipbuilding business about whether or not the country is done trying to build helicopter carriers. Russia‟s industry and trade minister, Denis Manturov, said in an interview with the news agency Interfax on August 20 that these projects, “in a pure sense of the word,” are over, though the Navy will retain a few such ships. (Manturov added that Russia is still discussing the construction of a second aircraft carrier.) Almost immediately after the interview was published, however, a “high-placed source in Russia‟s shipbuilding industry” told RIA Novosti that the Defense Ministry hasn‟t yet made up its mind about the future of helicopter-carrier construction in Russia. In June 2017, Viktor Bursuk, the deputy head of Russia‟s Navy, said the country planned to acquire two helicopter-carrier ships and complete work on a new aircraft carrier before 2025. Moscow wanted to buy two Mistral-class helicopter-carrier ships from France, but the deal fell through in 2015, following the annexation of Crimea. Those vessels, built for Russia, were ultimately sold to Egypt. Source: https://meduza.io Competition to build cut-price frigates for Royal Navy relaunched Alan Tovey, Industry Editor 20 August 2018 • 1:35pm A computer-generated image of how the Type 31e ships could look The competition to build budget frigates for the Royal Navy has been relaunched after it was halted last month, with defence chiefs saying they had received “insufficient compliant bids”.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Shipbuilding Plan
    FOREWORD We are pleased to launch Australia’s first Naval Shipbuilding Plan to complement the strategic, capability investment, and industry plans for the Defence portfolio that were set out in the Turnbull Government’s 2016 Defence White Paper, 2016 Integrated Investment Program and 2016 Defence Industry Policy Statement. The Plan sets out how our Government is delivering on our commitment to build a strong, sustainable and innovative Australian naval shipbuilding industry. It provides the foundation for implementing the Government’s unprecedented commitment to the greatest regeneration of our country’s naval capability since the Second World War. At the same time it will create a long-term, sustainable naval shipbuilding and ship sustainment capability that will serve our strategic and economic interests for many decades. We are a maritime nation and our security depends on a modern and effective Navy. Our investment will ensure protection of our maritime borders, secure our immediate northern approaches and proximate sea lines of communications, and enable us to project force in the maritime environment. The Plan demonstrates how we are looking to the future and sets out the Australian Government’s vision to deliver and sustain modern, capable naval vessels, on time and on budget, maximising Australian industry involvement and contributing to a secure and prosperous future for our nation. The Coalition Government has taken decisive action to commence continuous naval shipbuilding as soon as practicable, bringing forward construction dates for both the offshore patrol vessels and future frigates. We have invested in the design and construction of the modern infrastructure needed in our construction shipyards to deliver complex warships and submarines on a continuous build basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing Australia's Next Frigate
    STRATEGIC STRATEGIC INSIGHTS The next big grey thing – choosing Australia’s future frigate 131 Andrew Davies, Michael Shoebridge and James Mugg Introduction The SEA 5000 Future Frigate program has three separate broad objectives. The first is to replace the Anzac-class frigates from the mid-2020s, providing the RAN with a new class of warship with the desired capabilities. The second is industrial: faced with a steady loss of shipyard jobs over the past few years, the Australian Government wants work at the ASC Shipyard in South Australia to begin early in the 2020s. The third objective is to set up a continuous shipbuilding program that will continue to deliver locally built vessels in perpetuity, with an eye to being able to export systems, components or perhaps even warships in the future. There’s a tension between the first two objectives. The selection of a hull design hasn’t yet been made, although a decision is due in the near future. But it won’t be a matter of getting straight to work on the build—or at least it shouldn’t be. A large body of historical project performance data shows that beginning construction before the detailed design The Australian white ensign flying on HMAS Parramatta. © Image courtesy Australian Department of Defence May 2018 2 The next big grey thing – choosing Australia’s future frigate is largely locked down can result in costly and time-consuming problems down the track. And that includes the production engineering (or ‘productionising’, if we must)—the translation of a design into shipyard practices and processes, which is a complex discipline in its own right.
    [Show full text]
  • Veem Secures Order for Hunter Class Frigate Program Pilot from Bae Systems Maritime Australia
    ASX MEDIA RELEASE 26 July 2021 VEEM SECURES ORDER FOR HUNTER CLASS FRIGATE PROGRAM PILOT FROM BAE SYSTEMS MARITIME AUSTRALIA Highlights: • BAE Systems Maritime Australia, head contractor for the Hunter Class Frigate Program (HCFP), has placed an order with VEEM to manufacture a pilot propeller blade • The order enables VEEM to demonstrate it has the manufacturing capability to join the HCFP supply chain • As a world leader in premium commercial propellers that has delivered similar blades to defence clients globally, VEEM is very confident it can meet the requirements of the HCFP • Contract award for the propeller and brake blade manufacture for the first batch of three Hunter class frigates is anticipated in 2022 VEEM Limited (ASX: VEE) (‘VEEM’ or ‘the Company’), a designer and manufacturer of disruptive, high-technology marine propulsion and stabilization systems for the global luxury motor yacht, fast ferry, commercial workboat and defence industries, is pleased to announce that it has received an order from BAE Systems Maritime Australia (BAESMA) for the manufacture of a pilot propeller blade for the Hunter Class Frigate Program (HCFP). The purpose of the order – designated by BAESMA as a “targeted task” – enables VEEM to formally demonstrate it has the propeller manufacturing capability to deliver into the HCFP supply chain. VEEM is a world leader in premium commercial propellers that has delivered similar blades to defence clients globally. The company is very confident it can deliver the required accuracy. VEEM will produce the pilot propeller blade under the guidance of Kongsberg Maritime, one of the platform equipment providers for Type 26, the reference ship design for the Hunter class frigates.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Navy's Type 26 Frigate Program Moving Ahead
    ROYAL NAVY’S TYPE 26 FRIGATE PROGRAM MOVING AHEAD – AND CANADA JOINS IN. Source : Kym Bergmann APDR 25 October 2018 Until the future submarine program enters its construction phase several years from now, the biggest acquisition on the RAN’s books by far is the future frigate purchase, which has a budget of $35 billion. After a detailed evaluation there was a clear winner, with the BAE Systems bid being judged the one most clearly in Australia’s national interest. Contrary to some rumours at the time, the Department of Defence and the Navy were always solidly behind this proposal and the submission to Cabinet only required fine tuning on matters of detail. On October 19, the Canadian Government announced that it was also buying the Type 26 – the design being offered by successful combat system integrator, the local subsidiary of Lockheed Martin. Canada is looking for up to 15 frigates, which means the Type 26 will certainly be the most successful – and capable – non‐US frigate in the Western world, with the construction of around 30, albeit in different configurations depending on customer and local industry requirements. For BAE Systems to be almost simultaneously successful in the UK, Australia and Canada is a remarkable achievement – due in no small part to the support of the Royal Navy as well as being in the “sweet spot” on the design and manufacturing curve. Having said that, while contract negotiations with Australia are almost complete and seem uncontroversial, BAE Systems along with Lockheed Martin still need to go through the same process with the Canadian Government – and that is expected to take until the end of March 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Turning the Tide Rebuilding the UK’S Defence Shipbuilding Industry and the Fleet Solid Support Order CAMPAIGNING for MANUFACTURING JOBS
    CAMPAIGNING FOR MANUFACTURING JOBS Turning the Tide Rebuilding the UK’s defence shipbuilding industry and the Fleet Solid Support Order CAMPAIGNING FOR MANUFACTURING JOBS A Making It Report Written by: Laurence Turner, Research and Policy Offer, GMB Photographs on this page, page 10, 19 and 38 are published courtesy of BAE Systems. The pictures depict the QE Carrier, Type 26 and River-class Offshore Patrol Vessel ships which were built by GMB members. All other images used are our own. The picture opposite shows GMB shipbuilding reps meeting MPs and Shadow Ministers in Parliament to discuss this reoprt. Some images in this report are reproduced from a mural commissioned by the Amalgamated Society of Boilermakers, Shipwrights, Blacksmiths and Structural Workers. The mural commemorates GMB’s proud history in shipbuilding and other engineering occupations. Artist: John Warren. A GMB Making It report 1 Contents FOREWORD CAMPAIGNING FOR MANUFACTURING JOBS British shipbuilding is at a crossroads. Executive Summary 3 History 4 As the aircraft carrier programme winds down, there is real uncertainty over the future of the industry. The Government says that it wants to see a shipbuilding ‘renaissance’ but it has not The Royal Fleet Auxiliary and the Fleet Solid Support order 6 introduced the policies that would achieve this aim. Shipbuilding manufacturing is as much a part of our sovereign defence capability as the The RFA 6 warships and submarines that it produces. British yards can still build first class fighting and support ships: the Type 45 destroyer is the envy of the world. We are proud that it was made by Government shipbuilding procurement policy 6 GMB members.
    [Show full text]
  • DEF 40366 FSISP INT AW.Indd
    A PLAN FOR THE NAVAL SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY FUTURE SUBMARINE INDUSTRY SKILLS PLAN FUTURE SUBMARINE INDUSTRY SKILLS PLAN ___ A PLAN FOR THE NAVAL SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY www.defence.gov.au/dmo/publications/fsisp.cfm Acknowledgement The CEO DMO would like to acknowledge the major contributions from the study team of Mr Andrew Cawley, Mr Mel Melnyczek, Mr Paul Curtis and the contributions of Rear Admiral Oscar Hughes (ret’d) and Rear Admiral Rowan Moffi tt. In addition CEO would like to acknowledge peer review comments provided by senior personnel within Defence and industry. © 2013 Commonwealth of Australia This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth, which is available through the Department of Defence. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Director of DMO Media and Executive Communications Defence Materiel Organisation Russell Offi ces, R2-5-B036 Canberra ACT 2600 — The following organisations have provided images and graphics for use in this publication: Austal Australian Marine Complex AWD Alliance ASC BAE Systems Australia Defence SA General Dynamics Electric Boat Forgacs Engineering Raytheon Australia SAAB Systems Australia Thales Australia FUTURE SUBMARINE INDUSTRY SKILLS PLAN ___ A PLAN FOR THE NAVAL SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY CONTENTS FOREWORD> IV MR WARREN kING & MR ANDREW CAWLEY> IV MR DAVID MORTIMER AO VI INTRODUCTION> VIII EXECUTIVE>SUMMARY> X SECTIONS 01
    [Show full text]
  • Replacing the Collins Class
    AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT APR-MAY 2021 VOL.47 NO.3 REPLACING THE COLLINS CLASS AUSTRALIAN ARAFURA CLASS SEA 5000 SOVEREIGN GUIDED OFFSHORE PATROL VESSELS AND AUSTRALIAN WEAPONS CAPABILITY PROGRESS REPORT SPECIFIC CHANGES Overmatch Assured Powered by RAFAEL, Delivered by VRA TROPHY™ IRON DOME™ SPIKE LR2™ TYPHOON™ Powered by RAFAEL. Delivered by VRA www.rafael.co.il | www.vrasystems.com.au CONTENTS Print Post Approved PP349181/00104 Managing Director/Publisher FEATURES Overmatch Assured Marilyn Tangye Butler Phone: +61 (0) 410 529 324 AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT 12 RAYTHEON AUSTRALIA OPENS CENTRE FOR Email: [email protected] APR-MAY 2021 VOL.47 NO.3 JOINT INTEGRATION A major boost to sovereign capability Editor Kym Bergmann Phone: +61(0)412 539 106 Powered by RAFAEL, Delivered by VRA Email: [email protected] 16 AUSTRALIAN CONTENT ON ATTACK CLASS Contributors TO REACH 60% - EVENTUALLY Vladimir Karnozov By then will anyone care? Arie Egozi Mark Farrer Mike Yeo Geoff Slocombe 18 AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLES George Galdorisi – THE FUTURE OF WARFARE? Australia REPLACING THE COLLINS CLASS Will crewed submarines become obsolete? Ventura Media Asia-Pacific Pty Ltd PO Box 88, Miranda AUSTRALIAN ARAFURA CLASS SEA 5000 SOVEREIGN GUIDED OFFSHORE PATROL VESSELS AND AUSTRALIAN NSW 1490 Australia WEAPONS CAPABILITY PROGRESS REPORT SPECIFIC CHANGES ABN 76 095 476 065 20 FUTURE FRIGATE DESIGN REMAINS WITHIN HMAS Rankin and her crew conducted workups and training AGREED GUIDELINES Subscriptions assessments in the Western Australian Exercise Area to ensure Growth within the safety margins Rose Jeffree the Collins Class Submarine is ready to safely deploy later in the Phone: + 61 (0)2 9526 7188 year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Navy's New Frigates and the National Shipbuilding Strategy: February 2017 Update
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 7737, 2 February 2017 The Royal Navy's new frigates and the National By Louisa Brooke-Holland Shipbuilding Strategy: February 2017 update Contents: 1. Naval shipbuilding in the UK 2. The Navy’s new frigates 3. Offshore Patrol Vessels 4. Logistics ships 5. The Shipbuilding Strategy and the Parker report www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The Royal Navy's new frigates and the National Shipbuilding Strategy: February 2017 update Contents Summary 3 1. Naval shipbuilding in the UK 5 1.1 Naval shipbuilding in the UK 5 1.2 Complex warships built only in the UK? 9 1.3 Snapshot of the Shipbuilding Industry 10 2. The Navy’s new frigates 12 2.1 Will the Strategy lay out a build timetable? 13 2.2 No life extension for the Type 23 frigates 13 2.3 The Type 26 Global Combat Ship 14 2.4 The General Purpose Frigate (Type 31) 16 3. Offshore Patrol Vessels 20 4. Logistics ships 22 5. The Shipbuilding Strategy and the Parker report 23 5.1 Timeline of Government statements 23 5.2 Defence Committee recommendations 26 5.3 Sir John Parker’s report 26 5.4 Reaction 29 5.5 Government response to Defence Committee report 30 Appendix: the Royal Navy’s fleet 32 Contributing Authors: Chris Rhodes, Economic Policy and Statistics, section 2.3 Cover page image copyright HMS St Albans by Ministry of Defence. Licensed under the Open Government Licence / image cropped. HMS St Albans is a Type 23 frigate that is due to leave service in 2035.
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Dreadnought Revolution
    THE NEXT DREADNOUGHT REVOLUTION BY DAVID MURRIN 15TH MARCH 2021 WWW.DAVIDMURRIN.CO.UK PART 1: CURRENT DESIGN TRENDS AND LIMITATIONS THE NEXT DREADNOUGHT REVOLUTION THE NEXT DREADNOUGHT REVOLUTION HISTORY DECODED TO INFORM THE FUTURE PART 1: CURRENT DESIGN TRENDS AND LIMITATIONS BY ANALYSING PAST PATTERNS WE CAN PREDICT FORTHCOMING EVENTS AND TRENDS 1.0 TIME FOR A NEW DREADNOUGHT-TYPE INNOVATION IN WARSHIP DESIGN In a time when battleships usually took several years to build, the construction and launch in 1906 of HMS Dreadnought in less than 12 months was a demonstration of British military intention and industrial might. But most critically, her all big gun design and steam turbines made every ship built before that point obsolete. The geostrategic consequences were enormous as it gave Germany a window to attempt to challenge for control of the world’s oceans and accelerated the British-German naval arms’ race to astronomical levels. Today we are witnessing a new and fourth great industrial arms’ race, catalysed by China’s hegemonic ambitions as it seeks to outbuild America and its allies to create a blue-water navy that can dominate the world’s oceans. In this similar environment, perhaps it is time to consider the emergence of a new class of Dreadnought destroyers, which I have named Dominators, that can control large areas of ocean both below and above it. 1.1 DEDICATED MISSION DESTROYERS AND FRIGATES This ship design concept of dedicated mission escorts is favoured by all European navies and the Royal Navy is an excellent specific example of using this concept in its escort fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • DOWN the HAWESPIPE Do You Here There!
    NAVY LEAGUE OF AUSTRALIA July 2018 Volume 2, Issue 7 WESTERN AUSTRALIA DIVISION DOWN THE HAWESPIPE do you here there! Subscriptions now due COMING UP • AGM Wednesday 29th. August 2018 1900 • Executive meeting Monday 6th. August 1700 • Federal AGM 26th. October HMAS Toowoomba passing HMAS Ballarat 1 Anzac enterprise delivers on one million hour target Published on 02 July 2018 LEUT Gary McHugh (author), LSIS Lee-Anne Cooper (photographer) Location(s): BAE Systems, Henderson, WA A collaboration of industry participants from the Warship Asset Management Agreement (WAMA) Alliance at the BAE Systems yard, Henderson, WA. The alliance of partner industries charged with supporting Navy’s Anzac class Frigates have reached a significant safety milestone. The Warship Alliance Management Agreement (WAMA) have clocked up one million work hours without a lost time injury (LTI). General Manager Mr Tom Quaye said by achieving this milestone the alliance had positioned itself well ahead of the national average in terms of providing a safe workplace for its employees. “According to recent data from Safe Work Australia, the construction industry average for LTIs per million work hours is eight which makes this achievement all the more impressive,” he said. “Achieving this result while operating in a complex environment, where high risk construction activities are undertaken on a daily basis, is a credit to the dedication of all enterprise participants in their robust focus on the safety of their peo- ple.” The WAMA is a strategic partnership between the Commonwealth of Australia, BAE Systems, SAAB Australia, and Naval Ship Management Australia to deliver total asset management of the Anzac class Frigates.
    [Show full text]