DOCSLIB.ORG

Resolution of 28 January 2019, (Pursuant to Resolution Today) (The Speaker)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resolution of 28 January 2019, (Pursuant to Resolution Today) (The Speaker) No. 241 Monday 28 January 2019 Votes and Proceedings The House met at 2.30 pm. Prayers 1 Questions to the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government 2 Urgent Questions: (1) Venezuela (Sir Alan Duncan) (2) Teacher Recruitment and Retention Strategy (Nick Gibb) 3 Drone (Regulation) (No. 2) Bill: Presentation (Standing Order No. 57) Mr Peter Bone, supported by Esther McVey, Gordon Henderson, Jonathan Lord, Philip Davies, Henry Smith and Steve Double, presented a Bill to require drones to be marked and registered and to broadcast certain information electronically; to place restrictions on drone flight near aerodromes; and for connected purposes. Bill read the first time; to be read a second time on Friday 8 February, and to be printed (Bill 325). 4 Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill: Second Reading Motion made and Question proposed, That the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill be read a second time.—(Secretary Sajid Javid.) The Deputy Speaker announced a time limit on backbench speeches (Standing Order No. 47(1)). Question put. The House divided. Division No. 306 Ayes: 297 (Tellers: Jo Churchill, Wendy Morton) Noes: 234 (Tellers: Sir Alan Campbell, Jessica Morden) Question accordingly agreed to and Bill read a second time. 2 Votes and Proceedings: 28 January 2019 No. 241 5 Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill: Programme Motion made and Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 83A(7)), That the following provisions shall apply to the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill: Committal (1) The Bill shall be committed to a Public Bill Committee. Proceedings in Public Bill Committee (2) Proceedings in the Public Bill Committee shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion on Thursday 7 March. (3) The Public Bill Committee shall have leave to sit twice on the first day on which it meets. Proceedings on Consideration and up to and including Third Reading (4) Proceedings on Consideration and any proceedings in legislative grand committee shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion one hour before the moment of interruption on the day on which proceedings on Consideration are commenced. (5) Proceedings on Third Reading shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion at the moment of interruption on that day. (6) Standing Order No. 83B (Programming committees) shall not apply to proceedings on Consideration and up to and including Third Reading. Other proceedings (7) Any other proceedings on the Bill may be programmed.—(Mike Freer.) Question agreed to. 6 Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill: Ways and Means Motion made and Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 52(1)(a)), That, for the purposes of any Act resulting from the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill, it is expedient to authorise any fees or charges arising by virtue of the Act.—(Mike Freer.) Question agreed to. 7 Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill: Money Queen's Recommendation signified. Motion made and Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 52(1)(a)), That, for the purposes of any Act resulting from the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill, it is expedient to authorise the payment out of money provided by Parliament of: (1) any expenditure incurred by a Minister of the Crown, a government department, a person holding office under Her Majesty or any other public authority by virtue of the Act; and (2) any increase attributable to the Act in the sums payable by virtue of any other Act out of money so provided.—(Mike Freer.) Question agreed to. No. 241 Votes and Proceedings: 28 January 2019 3 8 Business of the House Motion made and Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 15), That, at this day’s sitting, the Motion in the name of Andrea Leadsom relating to the Business of the House (Today) may be entered upon, though opposed, at any hour; and Standing Order No. 41A (Deferred divisions) shall not apply.—(Mike Freer.) Question agreed to. 9 Business of the House (Today) Ordered, That, at today’s sitting, the Speaker shall put the questions necessary to dispose of the Motions in the name of Andrea Leadsom relating to Proxy Voting not later than one hour after the start of proceedings on this Motion; such questions shall include the questions on any amendments selected by the Speaker which may then be moved; proceedings may continue, though opposed, after the moment of interruption; and Standing Order No. 41A (Deferred divisions) shall not apply.—(Andrea Leadsom.) 10 Proxy Voting (Implementation) Motion made and Question proposed, That this House:— (1) reaffirms its resolution of 1 February 2018 on baby leave for Members of Parliament; (2) endorses the Fifth Report of the Procedure Committee, HC 825, on Proxy voting and parental absence; (3) accordingly directs the Speaker to prepare a pilot scheme governing the operation of proxy voting for Members absent from the House by reason of childbirth or care of an infant or newly adopted child, pursuant to the recommendations in the Committee’s report, this resolution and the temporary Standing Order (Voting by proxy for parental absence); (4) directs that a scheme prepared in accordance with this resolution and the temporary Standing Order (Voting by proxy for parental absence) shall be signed by the Speaker and the leaders of the three largest parties in the House before it is published, and that it shall enter into effect for a period of 12 months when the Speaker takes the chair on the sitting day after the day of publication; (5) directs that any amendment of a scheme in effect by virtue of paragraph (4) above shall take effect when the Speaker takes the Chair on the sitting day after a proposal signed by the Speaker and the leaders of the three largest parties in the House is published; and (6) directs the Procedure Committee to review proxy voting arrangements within 12 months of the commencement of a scheme established by virtue of this order.—(Andrea Leadsom.) The Speaker announced a time limit on backbench speeches (Standing Order No. 47(1)). Question put and agreed to. 4 Votes and Proceedings: 28 January 2019 No. 241 11 Proxy Voting (Temporary Standing Order) Motion made and Question proposed, That the following change to Standing Orders be made: Voting by proxy for parental absence (Temporary Standing Order) (1) A Member may, by reason of absence from the precincts of the House for childbirth or care of an infant or newly adopted child, arrange for their vote to be cast in accordance with this order by another Member acting as a proxy (a proxy vote). (2) A proxy vote may be cast: (a) in a division in the House, in Committee of the whole House, or in any legislative grand committee, in relation to the business specified in paragraph (3) below; (b) on business specified in paragraph (3) below recorded in a division under Standing Order No. 41A (Deferred divisions), and (c) in a ballot cast in an election under Standing Order No. 1B (Election of Speaker by secret ballot), Standing Order No. 2A (Election of the Deputy Speakers) and Standing Order No. 122B (Election of select committee chairs). (3) Subject to paragraph (4) below, a proxy vote may be cast on all public and private business of the House. (4) No proxy vote shall be cast in a division on any motion in the form specified in section 2(2) of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011. (5) No proxy vote shall be reckoned in the numbers participating in a division for the purposes of (a) Standing Order No. 41(1) (Quorum), and (b) Standing Order No. 37 (Majority for closure or for proposal of question). (6) A proxy vote may be cast only if the Speaker has certified that the Member for whom the vote is to be cast is eligible under the terms of this order and the Resolution of the House of Monday 28 January and if that certificate, including the name of the Member nominated as a proxy, has been published in the Votes and Proceedings. (7) A vote cast by a proxy shall be clearly indicated as such in the division lists published under the authority of the House. (8) This Standing Order shall lapse upon the expiry of the proxy voting scheme established under the terms of this order and the Resolution of the House of Monday 28 January.—(Andrea Leadsom.) Amendment (d) proposed, after paragraph (7), insert: '(7A) The Speaker may also make provision for the exercise of a proxy vote for Members who have suffered a miscarriage'.—(Philip Davies.) Amendment made. Main Question, as amended, agreed to. Ordered, That the following change to Standing Orders be made: Voting by proxy for parental absence (Temporary Standing Order) (1) A Member may, by reason of absence from the precincts of the House for childbirth or care of an infant or newly adopted child, arrange for their vote to be cast in accordance with this order by another Member acting as a proxy (a proxy vote). (2) A proxy vote may be cast: (a) in a division in the House, in Committee of the whole House, or in any legislative grand committee, in relation to the business specified in paragraph (3) below; (b) on business specified in paragraph (3) below recorded in a division under No. 241 Votes and Proceedings: 28 January 2019 5 Standing Order No. 41A (Deferred divisions), and (c) in a ballot cast in an election under Standing Order No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fighting Economic Crime - a Shared Responsibility!
    THIRTY-SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ECONOMIC CRIME SUNDAY 1st SEPTEMBER - SUNDAY 8th SEPTEMBER 2019 JESUS COLLEGE, UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE Fighting economic crime - a shared responsibility! Centre of Development Studies The 37th Cambridge International Symposium on Economic Crime Fighting economic crime- a shared responsibility! The thirty-seventh international symposium on economic crime brings together, from across the globe, a unique level and depth of expertise to address one of the biggest threats facing the stability and development of all our economies. The overarching theme for the symposium is how we can better and more effectively work together in preventing, managing and combating the threat posed by economically motivated crime and abuse. The programme underlines that this is not just the responsibility of the authorities, but us all. These important and timely issues are considered in a practical, applied and relevant manner, by those who have real experience whether in law enforcement, regulation, compliance or simply protecting their own or another’s business. The symposium, albeit held in one of the world’s leading universities, is not a talking shop for those with vested interests or for that matter an academic gathering. We strive to offer a rich and deep analysis of the real issues and in particular threats to our institutions and economies presented by economic crime and abuse. Well over 700 experts from around the world will share their experience and knowledge with other participants drawn from policy makers, law enforcement, compliance, regulation, business and the professions. The programme is drawn up with the support of a number of agencies and organisations across the globe and the Organising Institutions and principal sponsors greatly value this international commitment.
    [Show full text]
  • Foresight Hindsight
    Hindsight, Foresight ThinkingI Aboutnsight, Security in the Indo-Pacific EDITED BY ALEXANDER L. VUVING DANIEL K. INOUYE ASIA-PACIFIC CENTER FOR SECURITY STUDIES HINDSIGHT, INSIGHT, FORESIGHT HINDSIGHT, INSIGHT, FORESIGHT Thinking About Security in the Indo-Pacific Edited by Alexander L. Vuving Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Hindsight, Insight, Foresight: Thinking About Security in the Indo-Pacific Published in September 2020 by the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, 2058 Maluhia Rd, Honolulu, HI 96815 (www.apcss.org) For reprint permissions, contact the editors via [email protected] Printed in the United States of America Cover Design by Nelson Gaspar and Debra Castro Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Name: Alexander L. Vuving, editor Title: Hindsight, Insight, Foresight: Thinking About Security in the Indo-Pacific / Vuving, Alexander L., editor Subjects: International Relations; Security, International---Indo-Pacific Region; Geopolitics---Indo-Pacific Region; Indo-Pacific Region JZ1242 .H563 2020 ISBN: 978-0-9773246-6-8 The Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies is a U.S. Depart- ment of Defense executive education institution that addresses regional and global security issues, inviting military and civilian representatives of the United States and Indo-Pacific nations to its comprehensive program of resident courses and workshops, both in Hawaii and throughout the Indo-Pacific region. Through these events the Center provides a focal point where military, policy-makers, and civil society can gather to educate each other on regional issues, connect with a network of committed individuals, and empower themselves to enact cooperative solutions to the region’s security challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine
    ENTERING THE GREY-ZONE: Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine civiliansinconflict.org i RECOGNIZE. PREVENT. PROTECT. AMEND. PROTECT. PREVENT. RECOGNIZE. Cover: June 4, 2013, Spartak, Ukraine: June 2021 Unexploded ordnances in Eastern Ukraine continue to cause harm to civilians. T +1 202 558 6958 E [email protected] civiliansinconflict.org ORGANIZATIONAL MISSION AND VISION Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) is an international organization dedicated to promoting the protection of civilians in conflict. CIVIC envisions a world in which no civilian is harmed in conflict. Our mission is to support communities affected by conflict in their quest for protection and strengthen the resolve and capacity of armed actors to prevent and respond to civilian harm. CIVIC was established in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a young humanitarian who advocated on behalf of civilians affected by the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Honoring Marla’s legacy, CIVIC has kept an unflinching focus on the protection of civilians in conflict. Today, CIVIC has a presence in conflict zones and key capitals throughout the world where it collaborates with civilians to bring their protection concerns directly to those in power, engages with armed actors to reduce the harm they cause to civilian populations, and advises governments and multinational bodies on how to make life-saving and lasting policy changes. CIVIC’s strength is its proven approach and record of improving protection outcomes for civilians by working directly with conflict-affected communities and armed actors. At CIVIC, we believe civilians are not “collateral damage” and civilian harm is not an unavoidable consequence of conflict—civilian harm can and must be prevented.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF 203KB
    Foreign Affairs Committee Oral evidence: FCO-DFID merger, HC 525 Tuesday 7 July 2020 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 7 July 2020. Watch the meeting Members present: Tom Tugendhat (Chair); Alicia Kearns; Stewart Malcolm McDonald; Bob Seely; Henry Smith; Royston Smith. Questions 1 - 41 Witnesses I: Tim Durrant, Associate Director, Institute for Government; and Lord Macpherson of Earl’s Court CBE, former Permanent Secretary, HM Treasury. Examination of witnesses Witnesses: Tim Durrant and Lord Macpherson. Q1 Chair: Welcome to this afternoon’s session of the Foreign Affairs Committee. Lord Macpherson and Tim Durrant, I apologise to both of you for keeping you waiting. May I ask if you would very briefly say one line about yourselves? Lord Macpherson: I was permanent secretary of the Treasury from 2005 to 2016. Tim Durrant: I am an associate director at the Institute for Government, and I have looked at machinery of government changes in the past. Q2 Chair: We are going to go through a series of questions. May I ask you to keep your answers as brief as is reasonable? If you agree with your fellow speaker, do not feel the need to repeat. If you disagree, of course feel the need to challenge. That is very welcome. We are looking at the merger of the Foreign Office and the Department for International Development. Lord Macpherson, do you agree with the rationale that the Government have set out, and the timing? Lord Macpherson: In broad terms, I can see a case for bringing the Foreign Office and Development together.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Bill (Report Stage Decisions)
    Report Stage: Wednesday 26 May 2021 Environment Bill (Report Stage Decisions) This document sets out the fate of each clause, schedule, amendment and new clause considered at report stage. A glossary with key terms can be found at the end of this document. NEW CLAUSES AND NEW SCHEDULES RELATING TO PART 6; AMENDMENTS TO PART 6; NEW CLAUSES AND NEW SCHEDULES RELATING TO PART 7; AMENDMENTS TO PART 7; NEW CLAUSES AND NEW SCHEDULES RELATING TO CLAUSES 132 TO 139; AMENDMENTS TO CLAUSES 132 TO 139 NEW CLAUSES AND NEW SCHEDULES RELATING TO PART 6 Secretary George Eustice Agreed to NC21 To move the following Clause— “Habitats Regulations: power to amend general duties (1) The Secretary of State may by regulations amend the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (S.I. 2017/1012) (the “Habitats Regulations”), as they apply in relation to England, for the purposes in subsection (2). 5 (2) The purposes are—— (a) to require persons within regulation 9(1) of the Habitats Regulations to exercise functions to which that regulation applies— (i) to comply with requirements imposed by regulations 10 under this section, or (ii) to further objectives specified in regulations under this section, instead of exercising them to secure compliance with the requirements of the Directives; 15 (b) to require persons within regulation 9(3) of the Habitats Regulations, when exercising functions to which that regulation applies, to have regard to matters specified by regulations under this section instead of the requirements of the Directives. (3) The regulations may impose requirements, or specify objectives or 20 matters, relating to— (a) targets in respect of biodiversity set by regulations under section 1; 2 Wednesday 26 May 2021 REPORT STAGE (b) improvements to the natural environment which relate to biodiversity and are set out in an environmental improvement 25 plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the House of Commons December 2019 Diane ABBOTT MP
    Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Labour Conservative Diane ABBOTT MP Adam AFRIYIE MP Hackney North and Stoke Windsor Newington Labour Conservative Debbie ABRAHAMS MP Imran AHMAD-KHAN Oldham East and MP Saddleworth Wakefield Conservative Conservative Nigel ADAMS MP Nickie AIKEN MP Selby and Ainsty Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Conservative Bim AFOLAMI MP Peter ALDOUS MP Hitchin and Harpenden Waveney A Labour Labour Rushanara ALI MP Mike AMESBURY MP Bethnal Green and Bow Weaver Vale Labour Conservative Tahir ALI MP Sir David AMESS MP Birmingham, Hall Green Southend West Conservative Labour Lucy ALLAN MP Fleur ANDERSON MP Telford Putney Labour Conservative Dr Rosena ALLIN-KHAN Lee ANDERSON MP MP Ashfield Tooting Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Conservative Conservative Stuart ANDERSON MP Edward ARGAR MP Wolverhampton South Charnwood West Conservative Labour Stuart ANDREW MP Jonathan ASHWORTH Pudsey MP Leicester South Conservative Conservative Caroline ANSELL MP Sarah ATHERTON MP Eastbourne Wrexham Labour Conservative Tonia ANTONIAZZI MP Victoria ATKINS MP Gower Louth and Horncastle B Conservative Conservative Gareth BACON MP Siobhan BAILLIE MP Orpington Stroud Conservative Conservative Richard BACON MP Duncan BAKER MP South Norfolk North Norfolk Conservative Conservative Kemi BADENOCH MP Steve BAKER MP Saffron Walden Wycombe Conservative Conservative Shaun BAILEY MP Harriett BALDWIN MP West Bromwich West West Worcestershire Members of the House of Commons December 2019 B Conservative Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Evidence: the Work of the Cabinet Office, HC 118
    Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Oral evidence: The work of the Cabinet Office, HC 118 Wednesday 29 April 2020 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 29 April 2020. Watch the meeting Members present: Mr William Wragg (Chair); Ronnie Cowan; Jackie Doyle-Price; Chris Evans; Rachel Hopkins; Mr David Jones; David Mundell; Tom Randall; Lloyd Russell-Moyle; Karin Smyth; John Stevenson. Questions 172 - 286 Witness I: Rt Hon Michael Gove MP, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office. Examination of witness Witness: Rt Hon Michael Gove MP. [This evidence was taken by video conference] Q172 Chair: Good afternoon and welcome to another virtual public meeting of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee. I am in a Committee Room at Portcullis House with a small number of staff required to facilitate the meeting, suitably socially distanced from one another, and my other colleagues and the witness are at their homes and offices across the country. The Committee is grateful to the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster for making time to appear before us today. At the beginning of the Parliament it is usual for Committees to see their departmental Secretary of State to consider the work programme and priorities for the year ahead. However, we find ourselves in exceptional times and therefore today we will concentrate our questions on the ongoing coronavirus pandemic and the Cabinet Office’s response to it. We will postpone other questions on areas of responsibility for other weeks in the future. Members have agreed their questions.
    [Show full text]
  • View Call List: Chamber PDF File 0.08 MB
    Issued on: 21 April at 5.27pm Call lists for the Chamber Thursday 22 April 2021 A list of Members, both virtually and physically present, selected to ask Oral Questions and to speak in response to Urgent Questions and Ministerial Statements; and a list of Members both physically and virtually present selected to participate in substantive proceedings. Call lists are compiled and published incrementally as information becomes available. For the most up-to-date information see the parliament website: https://commonsbusiness.parliament.uk/ CONTENTS 1. Oral Questions to Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 1 2. Oral Questions to Church Commissioners, House of Commons Commission, Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body, Public Accounts Commission and Speaker’s Committee on the Electoral Commission 4 3. Business Questions (Leader of the House) 7 4. Ministerial Statement: Secretary of State for Defence on Commonwealth War Graves Commission - Special Committee Report on Historical Inequalities 9 5. Select Committee statement: the Special Report of the Committee on the Armed Forces Bill, Armed Forces Bill, HC 1281 10 6. Eighth Report of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee 10 7. Mass human rights abuses and crimes against humanity in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 11 ORAL QUESTIONS TO DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS After Prayers Order Member Question Party Virtual/ Minister replying Physical 1 Gavin Newlands What recent assessment SNP Virtual Secretary Eustice (Paisley and his Department has made Renfrewshire North) of trends in the level of UK exports of food and drink to the EU. 2 Thursday 22 April 2021 Order Member Question Party Virtual/ Minister replying Physical 2 Deidre Brock Supplementary SNP Virtual Secretary Eustice (Edinburgh North and Leith) 3 + 4 Alex Cunningham What discussions he has had Lab Virtual Secretary Eustice (Stockton North) with the Home Secretary on reducing dog thefts.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Private Secretaries: June 2019
    PARLIAMENTARY PRIVATE SECRETARIES – JUNE 2019 Prime Minister, First Lord of the Treasury and Minister for the Civil Service Rt Hon Theresa May MP – Andrew Bowie MP Cabinet Office ● Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Minister for the Cabinet Office – Rt Hon David Lidington MP – Luke Graham MP HM Treasury ● Chancellor of the Exchequer – Rt Hon Philip Hammond MP – Huw Merriman MP ● Ministerial team – Julian Knight MP Home Office ● Secretary of State for the Home Department – Rt Hon Sajid Javid MP – Gillian Keegan MP Foreign and Commonwealth Office ● Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs – Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt MP – James Cartlidge MP ● Ministerial team – Vicky Ford MP Department for Exiting the European Union ● Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – Rt Hon Stephen Barclay MP – Jack Lopresti MP Ministry of Defence ● Secretary of State for Defence – Rt Hon Penny Mordaunt MP – Alex Chalk MP Ministry of Justice ● Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice – Rt Hon David Gauke MP – Peter Heaton-Jones MP Department of Health and Social Care ● Secretary of State for Health and Social Care – Rt Hon Matt Hancock MP – Maggie Throup MP ● Ministerial team – David Duguid MP Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy ● Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy – Rt Hon Greg Clark MP – Alan Mak MP ● Ministerial team – Neil O’Brien MP Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government ● Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government – Rt Hon James Brokenshire
    [Show full text]
  • Title Maitland View
    TitleMaitland View Today, we'll see Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn swap what would be expected to be their normal campaign itineraries. The Prime Minister is touring North East, where she will accuse the Labour Party of abandoning the patriotic working class. It is expected she will deliver the speech, in a similar fashion to her other general election addresses, standing in front of a bank of suited Conservative candidates and quarantined from any members of the What have we learnt this week? general public. The Conservative are yet to hit their first Jeremy Corbyn, meanwhile, will pitch his real problem of this campaign. They foreign policy credentials at Chatham glided through the election spending House, taking on critics of his approach to scandal and remain high in the polls. All intervention and the use of nuclear this being equal, Theresa May will weapons. He will argue that he is not a returned to number 10 with an enormous pacifist and would support military action if majority. it has been sanctioned by the UN and is in accordance with international law, despite Labour, by accident or design, have got a having previously approved such action. In lot of coverage after their manifesto leak. his speech this morning, Corbyn will also The policies are popular, the leader distance himself from Donald Trump in a unpopular, and the polls stubborn. The thinly veiled jab to the Prime Minister's party divided, MPs bracing for defeat and recent visit to the US, saying "Pandering to government seeming a long way away. an erratic Trump administration will not deliver stability … So no more hand-holding Meanwhile the Liberal Democrats have with Donald Trump; a Labour government largely failed to achieve cut through, a will conduct a robust and independent surge in policies, announcements and foreign policy made in London." busy work, but little shift in the polls.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Brexit the Performance of Toxic Masculinity in House of Commons Debates During the Brexit Process
    Gender and Brexit the performance of toxic masculinity in House of Commons debates during the Brexit process Evelien Müller | 4688325 Radboud University Bachelor Thesis Prof. dr. Anna van der Vleuten 3 July 2020 Müller, 4688325/1 [door docent op te nemen op elk voorblad van tentamens] Integriteitscode voor studenten bij toetsen op afstand De Radboud Universiteit wil bijdragen aan een gezonde en vrije wereld met gelijke kansen voor iedereen. Zij leidt daartoe studenten op tot gewetensvolle, betrokken, kritische en zelfbewuste academici. Daarbij hoort een houding van betrouwbaarheid en integriteit. Aan de Radboud Universiteit gaan wij er daarom van uit dat je aan je studie bent begonnen, omdat je daadwerkelijk kennis wilt opdoen en je inzicht en vaardigheden eigen wilt maken. Het is essentieel voor de opbouw van je opleiding (en daarmee voor je verdere loopbaan) dat jij de kennis, inzicht en vaardigheden bezit die getoetst worden. Wij verwachten dus dat je dit tentamen op eigen kracht maakt, zonder gebruik te maken van hulpbronnen, tenzij dit is toegestaan door de examinator. Wij vertrouwen erop dat je tijdens deelname aan dit tentamen, je houdt aan de geldende wet- en regelgeving, en geen identiteitsfraude pleegt, je niet schuldig maakt aan plagiaat of andere vormen van fraude en andere studenten niet frauduleus bijstaat. Verklaring fraude en plagiaat tentamens Faculteit der Letteren Door dit tentamen te maken en in te leveren verklaar ik dit tentamen zelf en zonder hulp van anderen gemaakt te hebben. Ik verklaar bovendien dat ik voor dit tentamen geen gebruik heb gemaakt van papieren en/of digitale bronnen, notities, opnames of welke informatiedragers ook (tenzij nadrukkelijk vooraf door de examinator toegestaan) en geen overleg heb gepleegd met andere personen.
    [Show full text]