DOCSLIB.ORG

Download File

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download File Science and Poetry in Imperial Rome: Manilius, Lucan, and the Aetna Patrick Glauthier Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2011 © 2011 Patrick Glauthier All rights reserved ABSTRACT Science and Poetry in Imperial Rome: Manilius, Lucan, and the Aetna Patrick Glauthier This dissertation examines the relationship between scientific inquiry and hexameter poetry at Rome in the first century CE. It focuses on three poetic texts: Manilius’ Astronomica, Lucan’s Civil War, and the anonymous Aetna. It argues that despite generic and thematic differences, these works participate in a common dialogue and therefore can benefit from being read side by side. In particular, the dissertation demonstrates that all three authors reflect on the ability of poetry to communicate scientific knowledge, and that they simultaneously question or undermine the practical value of that knowledge. As a result, it allows us to see that scientific inquiry itself constitutes a dynamic and multifaceted area of creative literary activity in Early Imperial Rome. Table of Contents Acknowledgements iii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Structure and Contents 4 1.2 The Argument and its Context 8 2. Manilius and the Mathematics of the mundus 22 2.1 Mathematics and the Greco-Roman Literary Tradition 26 2.2 Complexity, Order, and Mathematical Knowledge 43 2.3 Addition, Enumeration, and the Supremacy of Mathematical Astrology 67 3. Science and Poetry in the Aetna 87 3.1 The Rejection of the Literary Tradition 89 3.2 Scientific Inquiry and the Marvelous Mountain 100 3.3 Reinventing the Aetna Topos 116 4. Lucan and the Limits of Didactic Poetry 133 4.1 The Reliability and Relevance of the Didactic Tradition 135 4.2 Cato and the Libyan Snakes 153 4.3 Acoreus and the Nile 178 i Conclusion 204 Bibliography 213 ii Acknowledgements While writing this dissertation I received assistance from a variety of individuals, and it is a great pleasure to thank them here. I owe an incalculable debt to the members of my committee. Professor Gareth Williams supervised the entire project; he helped me formulate and clarify my arguments at every stage, read numerous drafts, and offered invaluable criticisms and suggestions. Professor Katharina Volk was equally helpful and supportive from beginning to end; her feedback and insights improved virtually every aspect of the final product. Professor J.E.G. Zetzel commented on multiple drafts and provided stimulating input at various stages. Professors James Ker and Kristina Milnor graciously agreed to participate in the defense and read through the entire manuscript with diligence and care; their questions and comments encouraged me to look at familiar material in a different light. A dissertation completion fellowship from the Mrs. Giles Whiting Foundation provided a break from teaching duties and generous financial support. Jennifer Wasson heroically read and corrected drafts of several chapters, and Lisa Mignone gave encouragement and advice in difficult times (and shares my passion for all things volcanic). I owe a special debt of gratitude to my parents; they have always supported me, no matter what, and without them I would not be who I am today. And last but not least, I would like to express my deep and heartfelt thanks to Bridget, whose love, energy, and enthusiasm kept me sane and made it possible to finish. iii 1 Chapter 1: Introduction This dissertation examines the relationship between scientific inquiry and hexameter poetry at Rome in the first century CE. It concentrates on three poetic texts: Manilius’ Astronomica, the anonymous Aetna, and Lucan’s Civil War. It is my contention that despite generic and thematic differences, these works participate in a common intellectual dialogue and therefore can benefit from being read side by side. In this introduction, I will outline the arguments of the following chapters and then examine two basic problems with which all of these texts are concerned. As we will see, all three authors reflect on the suitability of poetry as a medium for communicating scientific knowledge and simultaneously call into question the value and practical benefits of that knowledge. Instead of considering the texts in chronological order, we will follow a narrative of increasing skepticism and trace the various ways in which these authors undermine the traditional motivations for, and even the very desirability of, explaining the natural world from a scientific perspective. At the same time, this project attempts to contribute to a growing interest in several areas of classical scholarship that have traditionally tended to receive less prominent critical consideration. Although Lucan’s poem has been the subject of a great deal of recent criticism, and a revaluation of so-called Silver Latin Poetry has been under way for some time, modern scholarship has paid comparatively little attention to the Astronomica and the Aetna, and no previous study has brought all three texts together. Similarly, despite widespread scholarly interest in Greco-Roman didactic poetry, discussions of Latin didactic tend to focus on Lucretius, Virgil, and Ovid. The permutations and reformulations to which post-Ovidian authors, such as Manilius and the Aetna poet, subject the genre have not received sufficient analysis, and Lucan’s 2 engagement with the tradition has gone virtually unnoticed.1 There is also a need for further examination of both Latin scientific writing and the treatment of scientific themes in verse. Historians of science routinely privilege Greek authors over their Roman counterparts and prose authors over their poetic rivals.2 This may seem natural enough. We possess a vast quantity of Greek scientific prose texts, the few poetic compositions that remain are generally considered to constitute mere verse adaptations of earlier prose treatises, and Rome rarely produced the kinds of highly original thinkers whom later scientists and historians of science turned into their own intellectual heroes and forebears. To put the matter simply, there appears to be no Roman Euclid, no Roman Ptolemy, no Roman Galen. Within a Roman context, Lucretius, Vitruvius, Seneca, and Pliny constitute the main exceptions to this trend, and their writings have seen a considerable renewal of interest in recent years.3 I wish to complement this renewal of interest and to add to the growing body of scholarship that takes seriously the literary value and intellectual subtlety of Silver Latin Poetry and post-Ovidian didactic. For the most part, however, I am not interested in the accuracy, origins, or immediate sources of the scientific 1 Comprehensive introductions to ancient didactic, such as Effe 1977 and Toohey 2006, do include later authors; cf. Schindler 2005 on Latin didactic as a whole. Notably, Schindler 2000 and Volk 2002 include Manilius in sustained analyses of Latin didactic. Volk 2005a treats the Aetna from this generic perspective, and Lausberg 1990 does the same for Lucan, albeit on a rather limited scale. 2 Some recent historians of science have devoted a good deal of substantive analysis to Roman prose and verse texts. Cuomo 2001, for example, offers a particularly subtle and insightful approach to ancient mathematics, both Greek and Latin. Similarly, Netz 2009 displays a unique sensitivity in his analyses of mathematical themes in Greek and Latin poetic texts. 3 Although Lucretius has long been popular, more recent works open up a variety of exciting perspectives; see, e.g., Gale 1994, Kennedy 2002, and Hardie 2009. Other recent stimulating studies of these authors include Beagon 1992, Inwood 2002, Murphy 2004, Hine 2006, and Williams 2012, which reworks and expands several earlier publications on Seneca’s NQ. Schama 1995 constitutes a particularly impressive study that offers keen readings of Vitruvius, Seneca, and Pliny within a vast historical and interdisciplinary framework. 3 theories that appear in the works under consideration. A variety of scholarly publications is available to explicate the theories themselves, and recent editors and commentators provide ample discussion.4 The derivative nature of much Roman technical writing is also well known, and there is little to be added to the results of more traditional forms of source criticism.5 Instead of creating genealogies or hunting for sources, I want to examine the ways in which scientific discourse itself functions as a key area of creative literary activity in the first century CE. By considering how Manilius, Lucan, and the Aetna poet probe the competing claims of different scientific traditions and actively negotiate the boundaries between science and poetry, this dissertation allows us to see that the literary exploration of different scientific fields makes a unique contribution to the intellectual history of the Early Empire. Before we begin, a word needs to be said about terminology. Recent historians of science have repeatedly emphasized that employing such terms as “science”, “scientist”, and “scientific” in ancient contexts constitutes a gross anachronism. The methods, goals, and fundamental assumptions of the modern sciences differ radically from those of any ancient intellectual pursuits, and any attempt to apply modern intellectual categories to Greco-Roman activities runs the risk of seriously misrepresenting the past.6 This is not the place to formulate a new vocabulary or approach, and despite the potential danger, I have decided to use these terms. 4 For Manilius, see Goold 1992, Feraboli, Flores, and Scarcia 1996-2001, and Volk 2009; Housman 1903-30 is still fundamental. For the Aetna, see Goodyear 1965, Paisley and Oldroyd 1979, Iodice 2002, and Volk 2005a. For the relevant portions of Lucan, see Lausberg 1990, Berti 2000, Raschle 2001, and Wick 2004. 5 For source criticism, see the works cited in the previous note, as well as Goodyear 1984, De Vivo 1989, and Bianchetti 1998 on the Aetna. It is particularly difficult to determine any of Manilius’ sources since the Astronomica is the earliest astrological text to have survived from Greco-Roman antiquity; accordingly, source-critical studies are highly conjectural.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NOTES on the CYNEGETICA of Ps. OPPIAN
    NOTES ON THE CYNEGETICA OF Ps. OPPIAN. En este artículo tratamos quince pasajes de las "Cinegéticas" que se atribuyen a Oppiano, los cuales comentamos de modo crítico e interpretativo. Llevamos a cabo el intento, antes de ser aceptada cualquier modificación de la tradición manuscrita, de realizar un estudio del texto, dentro del marco de la técnica ale- jandrina, y de las particularidades que presenta la lengua de esta época. Los pasajes que tratamos son los siguientes: C. 11 8, 260, 589, 111 22, 37, 183, 199, 360, IV 64, 177, 248, 277, 357, 407, 446. Boudreaux's edition of ps.- Oppian's Cynegetica, Paris 1908, an impressive work of profound and acute scholarship, has basically esta- blished the text of the poem and almost a century after its publication is the standard work for those who study ps.- Oppian. However, I think there is still room for improvement in the text. In this paper I would like to discuss various passages from the Cynegetica in the hope of cla- rifying them. For the convenience of the reader I print Boudreaux's text followed by Mair's translation. In the proemium of the second book the poet of the Cynegetica refers to the first hunters; according to the poet, Perseus was first among men to hunt, line 8ff.: ' Ev ilEp(517EGat 6 -rrpo5Tos- ô fopyóvos ctiiVva kóIpag ZrivOg xpuo-Eioto TrCíÏç KXUTÓS, EWETO nEpaeúg- áxxa Tro865v twatuvijo-tv ŬELOp_EVOS ITTEplj'yEaal KOli ITTC5Kag Kal 06.1ag EXaCUTO Kal yb)09 aly6JV 104 NOTES ON THE CYNEGETICA OF Ps. OPPIAN ĉrypoTépow8ópkoug TE 0001/9 Opirywv TE -yv€0Xct ctin-t5v éXd(1)WV 071.1(T(5V ClITTTO KápTiVa.
    [Show full text]
  • Celia M. Campbell CV 19/20
    Celia M. Campbell Department of Classics [email protected] Emory University 221 E Candler Library Atlanta, GA 30322 EDUCATION DPhil in Latin Language & Literature November 2014 Trinity College, University of Oxford (UK) Supervisor: Professor Matthew Leigh “A Space for Song: Ovid’s Metapoetic Landscapes” MSt in Greek and/or Latin Language and Literature July 2010 Trinity College, University of Oxford (UK) Distinction “The Metamorphoses and Cyclic Epic: Ovid’s Renewal of an Epic Ideology” BA Classics, cum laude June 2009 Williams College (Massachusetts, USA) RESEARCH AND TEACHING INTERESTS Latin poetry of the late Republic and early Empire; Latin pseudepigrapha; post-Virgilian pastoral (especially Dante’s Latin eclogues); landscape and ecphrasis in Classical Literature; Senecan drama PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS/ EMPLOYMENT Emory University August 2020 Assistant Professor of Classics Florida State University August 2018-May 2020 Dean’s Post-Doctoral Scholar University of Virginia August 2017-July 2018 Assistant Professor, General Faculty Fordham University August 2016- June 2017 Adjunct Instructor New York University January 2016- June 2017 Adjunct Instructor St. Anne’s College, University of Oxford September 2015-January 2016 Lecturer St. Anne’s College, University of Oxford October 2014- July 2015 Interim Head of Classics St. Anne’s College, University of Oxford October 2013- June 2014 Career Development Fellow Trinity College, University of Oxford October 2011- October 2013 Graduate Tutor St. Anne’s College, University of Oxford October
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs the Ptolemaic Family In
    Department of World Cultures University of Helsinki Helsinki Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs The Ptolemaic Family in the Encomiastic Poems of Callimachus Iiro Laukola ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Helsinki in auditorium XV, University Main Building, on the 23rd of September, 2016 at 12 o’clock. Helsinki 2016 © Iiro Laukola 2016 ISBN 978-951-51-2383-1 (paperback.) ISBN 978-951-51-2384-8 (PDF) Unigrafia Helsinki 2016 Abstract The interaction between Greek and Egyptian cultural concepts has been an intense yet controversial topic in studies about Ptolemaic Egypt. The present study partakes in this discussion with an analysis of the encomiastic poems of Callimachus of Cyrene (c. 305 – c. 240 BC). The success of the Ptolemaic Dynasty is crystallized in the juxtaposing of the different roles of a Greek ǴdzȅǻǽǷȏȄ and of an Egyptian Pharaoh, and this study gives a glimpse of this political and ideological endeavour through the poetry of Callimachus. The contribution of the present work is to situate Callimachus in the core of the Ptolemaic court. Callimachus was a proponent of the Ptolemaic rule. By reappraising the traditional Greek beliefs, he examined the bicultural rule of the Ptolemies in his encomiastic poems. This work critically examines six Callimachean hymns, namely to Zeus, to Apollo, to Artemis, to Delos, to Athena and to Demeter together with the Victory of Berenice, the Lock of Berenice and the Ektheosis of Arsinoe. Characterized by ambiguous imagery, the hymns inspect the ruptures in Greek thought during the Hellenistic age.
    [Show full text]
  • General Index
    GENERAL INDEX A.GILIM, and n. Aesopic tradition, , and abstractions, n. nn. –, Acarnania, Aetna, , Acastus, Aetna, n. Accius, and n. Agamemnon, n. , , , accusative, , n. , –, , –, , – Agdistis, Achelous, Agenor, Achilles, , , , , , , , ages, myth of, see races, myth of –, , , , , Agias of Troezen, , Acontius, , n. , , agriculture, , , , , , – and n. , , , , , –, Actaeon, n. , , , , n. , –, ; Actor, agriculture section in Works and Acusilaus of Argos, and n. , Days, , , –, and n. Agrius, Adad, aidos, n. , ; personified, , adamant, adjective(s), , , Aietes, Admonitions of Ipuwar,andn. Aigipan, Adodos, ainos, , –, Adrasteia, Aither, and n. Adriatic (sea), Aithon, , n. Aegean (sea), , , aitiology, , , nn. –, Aegimius, – and n. , , , and Aegle, , n. , , , , Aelian Ajax son of Oileus, Historical miscellany, , Ajax son of Telamon, , , – and n. Aeolic dialect, , –, , Akkadian, n. , n. , , , , –; East Al Mina, , or Asiatic Aeolic, –, Alalu, , n. , , Alcaeus, , , n. Aeolids, , , Alcidamas, , , , , , Aeolis, Eastern, , , –, , n. Aeolism, , , , Alcinous, , n. , n. , Aeolus, –, , , , Aeschines, Alcmaeonidae, Aeschylus, , , , and Alcmaeonis, n. , Alcman, n. , and n. , Prometheus Bound, n. , and n. n. Alcmaon, – general index Alcmene, –, –, Antoninus Liberalis, , , n. , , , Anu, –, , –, –, aoidos see singer Alcyone, , , , aorist, , –, Alexander Aetolus, , n. apate, ; personified, Alexander the Great, n. , Aphrodite, , , n. , and n. , n. , and n. ,
    [Show full text]
  • Narratology and the End of Monarchy in AVC 1
    Luke Patient Classics Department [email protected] University of Arizona Narratology and the End of Monarchy in AVC 1 I. The section of the narrative text to be considered ( AVC 1.59.1, 6-11): 1. Brutus illis luctu occupatis cultrum ex volnere Lucretiae extractum, manantem cruore prae se tenens, "Per hunc" inquit "castissimum ante regiam iniuriam sanguinem iuro, vosque, di, testes facio me L. Tarquinium Superbum cum scelerata coniuge et omni liberorum stirpe ferro igni quacumque dehinc vi possim exsecuturum, nec illos nec alium quemquam regnare Romae passurum." … Vbi eo ventum est, quacumque incedit armata multitudo, pavorem ac tumultum facit; rursus ubi anteire primores civitatis vident, quidquid sit haud temere esse rentur. Nec minorem motum animorum Romae tam atrox res facit quam Collatiae fecerat; ergo ex omnibus locis urbis in forum curritur. Quo simul ventum est, praeco ad tribunum celerum, in quo tum magistratu forte Brutus erat, populum advocavit. Ibi oratio habita nequaquam eius pectoris ingeniique quod simulatum ad eam diem fuerat, de vi ac libidine Sex. Tarquini, de stupro infando Lucretiae et miserabili caede, de orbitate Tricipitini cui morte filiae causa mortis indignior ac miserabilior esset. Addita superbia ipsius regis miseriaeque et labores plebis in fossas cloacasque exhauriendas demersae; Romanos homines, victores omnium circa populorum, opifices ac lapicidas pro bellatoribus factos. Indigna Ser. Tulli regis memorata caedes et inuecta corpori patris nefando vehiculo filia, invocatique ultores parentum di. His atrocioribusque, credo, aliis, quae praesens rerum indignitas haudquaquam relatu scriptoribus facilia subicit, memoratis, incensam multitudinem perpulit ut imperium regi abrogaret exsulesque esse iuberet L. Tarquinium cum coniuge ac liberis.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MYTH of ORPHEUS and EURYDICE in WESTERN LITERATURE by MARK OWEN LEE, C.S.B. B.A., University of Toronto, 1953 M.A., Universi
    THE MYTH OF ORPHEUS AND EURYDICE IN WESTERN LITERATURE by MARK OWEN LEE, C.S.B. B.A., University of Toronto, 1953 M.A., University of Toronto, 1957 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OP PHILOSOPHY in the Department of- Classics We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September, i960 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada. ©he Pttttrerstt^ of ^riitsl} (Eolimtbta FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES PROGRAMME OF THE FINAL ORAL EXAMINATION FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY of MARK OWEN LEE, C.S.B. B.A. University of Toronto, 1953 M.A. University of Toronto, 1957 S.T.B. University of Toronto, 1957 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 1960 AT 3:00 P.M. IN ROOM 256, BUCHANAN BUILDING COMMITTEE IN CHARGE DEAN G. M. SHRUM, Chairman M. F. MCGREGOR G. B. RIDDEHOUGH W. L. GRANT P. C. F. GUTHRIE C. W. J. ELIOT B. SAVERY G. W. MARQUIS A. E. BIRNEY External Examiner: T. G. ROSENMEYER University of Washington THE MYTH OF ORPHEUS AND EURYDICE IN WESTERN Myth sometimes evolves art-forms in which to express itself: LITERATURE Politian's Orfeo, a secular subject, which used music to tell its story, is seen to be the forerunner of the opera (Chapter IV); later, the ABSTRACT myth of Orpheus and Eurydice evolved the opera, in the works of the Florentine Camerata and Monteverdi, and served as the pattern This dissertion traces the course of the myth of Orpheus and for its reform, in Gluck (Chapter V).
    [Show full text]
  • Lucan's Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulf
    Lucan’s Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2014 Reading Committee: Catherine Connors, Chair Alain Gowing Stephen Hinds Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Classics © Copyright 2014 Laura Zientek University of Washington Abstract Lucan’s Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Catherine Connors Department of Classics This dissertation is an analysis of the role of landscape and the natural world in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. I investigate digressions and excurses on mountains, rivers, and certain myths associated aetiologically with the land, and demonstrate how Stoic physics and cosmology – in particular the concepts of cosmic (dis)order, collapse, and conflagration – play a role in the way Lucan writes about the landscape in the context of a civil war poem. Building on previous analyses of the Bellum Civile that provide background on its literary context (Ahl, 1976), on Lucan’s poetic technique (Masters, 1992), and on landscape in Roman literature (Spencer, 2010), I approach Lucan’s depiction of the natural world by focusing on the mutual effect of humanity and landscape on each other. Thus, hardships posed by the land against characters like Caesar and Cato, gloomy and threatening atmospheres, and dangerous or unusual weather phenomena all have places in my study. I also explore how Lucan’s landscapes engage with the tropes of the locus amoenus or horridus (Schiesaro, 2006) and elements of the sublime (Day, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Receptions of Ovid's Tristia Dissertation
    RENAISSANCE RECEPTIONS OF OVID’S TRISTIA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Gabriel Fuchs, M.A. Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Frank T. Coulson, Advisor Benjamin Acosta-Hughes Tom Hawkins Copyright by Gabriel Fuchs 2013 ABSTRACT This study examines two facets of the reception of Ovid’s Tristia in the 16th century: its commentary tradition and its adaptation by Latin poets. It lays the groundwork for a more comprehensive study of the Renaissance reception of the Tristia by providing a scholarly platform where there was none before (particularly with regard to the unedited, unpublished commentary tradition), and offers literary case studies of poetic postscripts to Ovid’s Tristia in order to explore the wider impact of Ovid’s exilic imaginary in 16th-century Europe. After a brief introduction, the second chapter introduces the three major commentaries on the Tristia printed in the Renaissance: those of Bartolomaeus Merula (published 1499, Venice), Veit Amerbach (1549, Basel), and Hecules Ciofanus (1581, Antwerp) and analyzes their various contexts, styles, and approaches to the text. The third chapter shows the commentators at work, presenting a more focused look at how these commentators apply their differing methods to the same selection of the Tristia, namely Book 2. These two chapters combine to demonstrate how commentary on the Tristia developed over the course of the 16th century: it begins from an encyclopedic approach, becomes focused on rhetoric, and is later aimed at textual criticism, presenting a trajectory that ii becomes increasingly focused and philological.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Reading Athenaios' Epigraphical Hymn to Apollo: Critical Edition And
    Reading Athenaios’ Epigraphical Hymn to Apollo: Critical Edition and Commentaries DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Corey M. Hackworth Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Fritz Graf, Advisor Benjamin Acosta-Hughes Carolina López-Ruiz 1 Copyright by Corey M. Hackworth 2015 2 Abstract This dissertation is a study of the Epigraphical Hymn to Apollo that was found at Delphi in 1893, and since attributed to Athenaios. It is believed to have been performed as part of the Athenian Pythaïdes festival in the year 128/7 BCE. After a brief introduction to the hymn, I provide a survey and history of the most important editions of the text. I offer a new critical edition equipped with a detailed apparatus. This is followed by an extended epigraphical commentary which aims to describe the history of, and arguments for and and against, readings of the text as well as proposed supplements and restorations. The guiding principle of this edition is a conservative one—to indicate where there is uncertainty, and to avoid relying on other, similar, texts as a resource for textual restoration. A commentary follows, which traces word usage and history, in an attempt to explore how an audience might have responded to the various choices of vocabulary employed throughout the text. Emphasis is placed on Athenaios’ predilection to utilize new words, as well as words that are non-traditional for Apolline narrative. The commentary considers what role prior word usage (texts) may have played as intertexts, or sources of poetic resonance in the ears of an audience.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poetics of Science: Intertextual and Metatextual Themes in Ovid's Depiction of Cosmic and Human Origins
    Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title The poetics of science: intertextual and metatextual themes in Ovid's depiction of cosmic and human origins Author(s) Kelly, Peter Publication Date 2016-09-09 Item record http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6075 Downloaded 2021-09-28T20:42:11Z Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. The Poetics of Science Intertextual and Metatextual Themes in Ovid’s Depiction of Cosmic and Human Origins By Peter M. J. Kelly A Thesis Submitted to the National University of Ireland, Galway in the College of Arts, Social Sciences and Celtic Studies for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics September 2016 Supervisor: Prof. Michael Clarke ii Preface This work explores ancient views of cosmogony and the material structure of the universe in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. In particular it focuses on the way in which Ovid problematizes how we define myth and poetry versus science and philosophy. It examines how Ovid generates a parallel between the form and content of the text in order to depict a world where abstract scientific principles can become personified deities. This work will seek to reevaluate the impact of Greek Philosophy on Roman poetry through extending the series of intertexts which we may observe Ovid alluding to. Through following and analysing these sets of allusions this work will seek to gain an insight into Ovid’s depiction of the metatextual universe. iii iv For my Parents The scientist’s demand that nature shall be lawful is a demand for unity.
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Measure: Caesar's Geographies of Gallia and Britannia in Their Contexts and As Evidence of His World Map
    The World's Measure: Caesar's Geographies of Gallia and Britannia in their Contexts and as Evidence of his World Map Christopher B. Krebs American Journal of Philology, Volume 139, Number 1 (Whole Number 553), Spring 2018, pp. 93-122 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.2018.0003 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/687618 Access provided at 25 Oct 2019 22:25 GMT from Stanford Libraries THE WORLD’S MEASURE: CAESAR’S GEOGRAPHIES OF GALLIA AND BRITANNIA IN THEIR CONTEXTS AND AS EVIDENCE OF HIS WORLD MAP CHRISTOPHER B. KREBS u Abstract: Caesar’s geographies of Gallia and Britannia as set out in the Bellum Gallicum differ in kind, the former being “descriptive” and much indebted to the techniques of Roman land surveying, the latter being “scientific” and informed by the methods of Greek geographers. This difference results from their different contexts: here imperialist, there “cartographic.” The geography of Britannia is ultimately part of Caesar’s (only passingly and late) attested great cartographic endeavor to measure “the world,” the beginning of which coincided with his second British expedition. To Tony Woodman, on the occasion of his retirement as Basil L. Gildersleeve Professor of Classics at the University of Virginia, in gratitude. IN ALEXANDRIA AT DINNER with Cleopatra, Caesar felt the sting of curiosity. He inquired of “the linen-wearing Acoreus” (linigerum . Acorea, Luc. 10.175), a learned priest of Isis, whether he would illuminate him on the lands and peoples, gods and customs of Egypt. Surely, Lucan has him add, there had never been “a visitor more capable of the world” than he (mundique capacior hospes, 10.183).
    [Show full text]
  • Scribes and Scholars (3Rd Ed. 1991)
    SCRIBES AND SCHOLARS A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature BY L. D. REYNOLDS Fellow and Tutor of Brasenose College, Oxford AND N. G. WILSON Fellow and Tutor of Lincoln College, Oxford THIRD EDITION CLARENDON PRESS • OXFORD Oxford University Press, Walton Street, Oxford 0x2 6DP Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bombay Calcutta Cape Town Dares Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madras Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi Paris Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Oxford is a trade mark of Oxford University Press Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Oxford University Press 1968, 1974, 1991 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press. Within the UK, exceptions are allowed in respect of any fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of the licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms and in other countries should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Scribes and scholars: a guide to the transmission of Greek and Latin literature/by L.
    [Show full text]