DOCSLIB.ORG

Five Springs Restored Channel Revgetation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Five Springs Restored Channel Revgetation Plan 1 ABSTRACT The following revegetation/restoration plan was prepared for the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge (AHME). This plan describes measures to establish desired native plants within the footprint of proposed channel reconstructions in the Upper Carson Slough and Crystal Spring Management Units. Additionally, this plan describes measures to remove non-native, invasive species that, if left untreated, could reduce native species establishment and survival throughout the AHME. The treatment of non-native, invasive species includes areas where monocultures of these plants have developed, as well as a few sites that have potential for invasion following restoration actions such as the removal or modification of Crystal and Peterson Reservoirs. This document also includes plans for planting the former Mud Lake Reservoir and abandoned agricultural fields that have been slow to recover. Carson Slough and Crystal Spring Revegetation | Final Report i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... i 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 3 Prioritization of Revegetation and Weed Treatments in Conjunction with Spring Restoration Efforts .................................................................................................................. 3 3.1 Historical Conditions.............................................................................................5 3.1.1 Disturbance Regimes ...................................................................................14 3.2 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................14 3.3 Desired Future Conditions ..................................................................................15 4 Phases of Wetland Revegetation.................................................................................. 25 4.1 Plant Propagation ................................................................................................25 4.2 Plant Salvage .......................................................................................................31 4.3 Weed Treatment and Revegetation Efforts .........................................................32 4.3.1 Weed Removal .............................................................................................32 4.3.2 Coordination of Weed Removal Efforts ......................................................51 4.3.3 Additional Weed Concerns ..........................................................................52 4.4 Preparation of the Soil Surface............................................................................53 4.5 Planting and Irrigation .........................................................................................54 4.5.1 Planting ........................................................................................................54 4.5.2 Irrigation ......................................................................................................55 4.6 Monitoring and Further Weed Removal Efforts .................................................56 5 Upper Carson Slough ........................................................................................................ 57 5.1 Weed Treatments within Upper Carson Slough ..................................................59 5.2 Fairbanks Spring Channel ...................................................................................61 5.3 Soda Spring Channel ...........................................................................................64 5.4 Rogers Spring Channel........................................................................................67 5.5 Longstreet Spring Channel ..................................................................................70 5.6 Five Springs Channel ..........................................................................................76 6 Crystal Spring Management Unit ................................................................................. 79 6.1 Weed Treatments within the Crystal Spring Management Unit .........................81 6.2 Forest and Kings Spring Channels ......................................................................81 6.3 Bradford Spring Channel ....................................................................................85 6.4 Crystal Spring Channel .......................................................................................88 7 Revegetation following Reservoir Modifications or Removals ......................... 92 7.1 Crystal Reservoir .................................................................................................92 7.2 Mud Lake Dam Reservoir ...................................................................................95 7.3 Peterson Reservoir...............................................................................................97 8 Revegetation of Abandoned Agricultural Fields .................................................... 99 8.1 Soil Assessment and Amendments .....................................................................99 8.2 Planting..............................................................................................................100 8.3 Irrigation ............................................................................................................100 ii Otis Bay Ecological Consultants 8.4 Monitoring of Revegetation Efforts ..................................................................101 8.5 Agricultural Field Selection for Active Revegetation .......................................101 8.6 Point of Rocks ...................................................................................................103 8.7 Longstreet ..........................................................................................................105 9 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 108 10 Literature Cited .................................................................................................... 109 Carson Slough and Crystal Spring Revegetation | Final Report iii 2 INTRODUCTION The following revegetation/restoration plan describes methods to establish desired native plants throughout the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge (AHME). AHME is located east of Death Valley National Park and south of Amargosa Valley, NV (Figure 2-1). Habitat restoration activities are ongoing at AHME, and plans for future restoration projects are in development. This revegetation plan is designed to allow managers to prepare for and implement these projects. Revegetation efforts hasten the habitat restoration process and are especially important in arid habitats, where plant succession is slow. Additional benefits of revegetation include reduced soil erosion, improved streambank stability, improved upland and riparian wildlife habitat, and decreased spread of non-native, invasive plants. Active revegetation of wetland areas and weed treatments are the highest priority. These actions will have the greatest positive effect on establishing and maintaining native plants throughout the AHME. In order to formulate this plan, historical environmental conditions, existing vegetation types, and desired future conditions were explored. We focused extensively on weed distributions and removal strategies because weeds are often the biggest hurdle in restoration efforts. This plan provides details for propagation and planting of desired species and suggestions for soil amendments for revegetation of abandoned agricultural fields. A general monitoring protocol is also suggested. This revegetation plan will require refinement in the near future because restoration plans are still in development for most of these areas. Carson Slough and Crystal Spring Revegetation | Final Report 1 Figure 2-1. Location of Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge (outlined in red). 2 Otis Bay Ecological Consultants 3 PRIORITIZATION OF REVEGETATION AND WEED TREATMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH SPRING RESTORATION EFFORTS This revegetation plan is intended to complement current and future restoration efforts throughout the AHME and specifically within the Upper Carson Slough (UCS) and Crystal Spring Management Units (CMU). Revegetation efforts and weed treatments are proposed for five spring systems within the Upper Carson Slough Management Unit (Fairbanks, Soda, Rogers, Longstreet and Five Springs) and four springs within the Crystal Spring Management Unit (Bradford, Kings, Forest, and Crystal). Planting recommendations are presented for existing and former reservoirs for which removal or modification is being recommended in the UCS and CMU restoration plans; specifically Crystal, Peterson and Mud Lake Dam Reservoirs. Additionally, the plan prioritizes treatment areas for non-native, invasive plants (i.e., weeds). Revegetation efforts and weed treatments are prioritized in light of limited funding and the threat of continued invasion by various weeds. Rapid and cost-effective revegetation may include salvage of plant material prior to channel construction and replanting immediately following channel completion. Apart from construction areas, places dominated by weeds throughout Ash Meadows should be treated and planted. Existing weed patches serve as propagule
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pest Management of Small Grains—Weeds
    PUBLICATION 8172 SMALL GRAIN PRODUCTION MANUAL PART 9 Pest Management of Small Grains—Weeds MICK CANEVARI, University of California Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor, San Joaquin County; STEVE ORLOFF, University of California Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor, Siskiyou County; RoN VARGAS, University of California Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor, UNIVERSITY OF Madera County; STEVE WRIGHT, University of California Cooperative Extension Farm CALIFORNIA Advisor, Tulare County; RoB WILsoN, University of California Cooperative Extension Farm Division of Agriculture Advisor, Lassen County; DAVE CUDNEY, Extension Weed Scientist Emeritus, Botany and and Natural Resources Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside; and LEE JACKsoN, Extension Specialist, http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu Small Grains, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis This publication, Pest Management of Small Grains—Weeds, is the ninth in a fourteen- part series of University of California Cooperative Extension online publications that comprise the Small Grain Production Manual. The other parts cover specific aspects of small grain production practices in California: • Part 1: Importance of Small Grain Crops in California Agriculture, Publication 8164 • Part 2: Growth and Development, Publication 8165 • Part 3: Seedbed Preparation, Sowing, and Residue Management, Publication 8166 • Part 4: Fertilization, Publication 8167 • Part 5: Irrigation and Water Relations, Publication 8168 • Part 6: Pest Management—Diseases, Publication 8169 • Part 7:
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve Land Management Plan (LMP)
    State of California California Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE FINAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN for INDIAN JOE SPRINGS ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Inyo County, California April, 2018 Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve -1- April, 2018 Land Management Plan INDIAN JOE SPRINGS ECOLOGICAL RESERVE FINAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve -ii- April, 2018 Land Management Plan This Page Intentionally Left Blank Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve -iv- April, 2018 Land Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF TABLES vii I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Purpose of and History of Acquisition 1 B. Purpose of This Management Plan 1 II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2 A. Geographical Setting 2 B. Property Boundaries and Adjacent Lands 2 C. Geology, Soils, Climate, Hydrology 3 D. Cultural Features 13 III. HABITAT AND SPECIES DESCRIPTION 15 A. Vegetation Communities, Habitats 15 B. Plant Species 18 C. Animal Species 20 D. Threatened, Rare or Endangered Species 22 IV. MANAGEMENT GOALS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 35 A. Definition of Terms Used in This Plan 35 B. Biological Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 35 C. Biological Monitoring Element: Goals & Environmental Impacts 39 D. Public Use Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 41 E. Facility Maintenance Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 44 F. Cultural Resource Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 46 G. Administrative Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 46 V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SUMMARY 48 Existing Staff and Additional Personnel Needs Summary 48 VI. CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGIES 48 VII. FUTURE REVISIONS TO LAND MANAGEMENT PLANS 51 VIII. REFERENCES 54 Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve -v- April, 2018 Land Management Plan APPENDICES: A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plant Press the ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY
    The Plant Press THE ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY Volume 36, Number 1 Summer 2013 In this Issue: Plants of the Madrean Archipelago 1-4 Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Conference 5-8 Abstracts of Botanical Papers Presented in the Madrean Archipelago Conference Southwest Coralbean (Erythrina flabelliformis). Plus 11-19 Conservation Priority Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Setting for Arizona G1 Conference and G2 Plant Species: A Regional Assessment by Thomas R. Van Devender1. Photos courtesy the author. & Our Regular Features Today the term ‘bioblitz’ is popular, meaning an intensive effort in a short period to document the diversity of animals and plants in an area. The first bioblitz in the southwestern 2 President’s Note United States was the 1848-1855 survey of the new boundary between the United States and Mexico after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848 ended the Mexican-American War. 8 Who’s Who at AZNPS The border between El Paso, Texas and the Colorado River in Arizona was surveyed in 1855- 9 & 17 Book Reviews 1856, following the Gadsden Purchase in 1853. Besides surveying and marking the border with monuments, these were expeditions that made extensive animal and plant collections, 10 Spotlight on a Native often by U.S. Army physicians. Botanists John M. Bigelow (Charphochaete bigelovii), Charles Plant C. Parry (Agave parryi), Arthur C. V. Schott (Stephanomeria schotti), Edmund K. Smith (Rhamnus smithii), George Thurber (Stenocereus thurberi), and Charles Wright (Cheilanthes wrightii) made the first systematic plant collection in the Arizona-Sonora borderlands. ©2013 Arizona Native Plant In 1892-94, Edgar A. Mearns collected 30,000 animal and plant specimens on the second Society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ploidy Races of Atriplex Confertifolia (Chenopodiaceae)
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 71 Number 1 Article 10 4-20-2011 The ploidy races of Atriplex confertifolia (Chenopodiaceae) Stewart C. Sanderson USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Shrub Sciences Laboratory, Provo, Utah, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Part of the Anatomy Commons, Botany Commons, Physiology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Sanderson, Stewart C. (2011) "The ploidy races of Atriplex confertifolia (Chenopodiaceae)," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 71 : No. 1 , Article 10. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol71/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 71(1), © 2011, pp. 67–77 THE PLOIDY RACES OF ATRIPLEX CONFERTIFOLIA (CHENOPODIACEAE) Stewart C. Sanderson1 ABSTRACT.—Previous accounts of polyploidy in the North American salt desert shrub Atriplex confertifolia (shad- scale) have dealt with the distribution of polyploidy and the morphological and secondary chemical differences between races. The present study amplifies these studies and reveals additional ploidy-flavonoid races, with ploidy levels known to extend from 2x to 12x, and all except 2x and 12x represented by races with and without 6-methoxylation of flavonol compounds. Results of this study show that diploids across their range have about 113% as much DNA per genome as do polyploids and that parallel variation in monoploid genome size between diploids and accompanying polyploids can be shown in different parts of the species’ range.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexican Fireweed Bassia Scoparia (L.) A.J
    Draft Common Name Latin Name (Full USDA Nomenclature) MN NWAC Risk Mexican Fireweed Bassia scoparia (L.) A.J. Scott Assessment Worksheet (04-2017) (Other common names include kochia, (Synonyms – Kochia scoparia, Bassia summer/mock/belvedere/annual/broom sieversiana, Kochia alata, Kochia sieversiana, cypress, burning bush/burningbush, common Kochia trichophylla/phila, Kochia alata, kochia, belvedere, red belvedere, mirabel, Kochia childsii, Kochia parodii, Kochia Mexican firebush/firebrush, firebush, virgata, and Chenopodium scoparium) ragweed, fireball, railroad weed, poor man’s alfalfa, tumbleweed, and common red sage) Original Reviewer: James Calkins Affiliation/Organization: Minnesota Nursery Original Review: (07/25/2017) and Landscape Association (MNLA) Current Reviewer: James Calkins Affiliation/Organization: Minnesota Nursery Current Review Date: (07/25/2017) and Landscape Association (MNLA) Species Description: Appearance: Bassia scoparia (formerly and still commonly known as Kochia scoparia), native to central and eastern Europe and western Asia, is a medium to fairly large (1-6 feet tall), upright, bushy (highly-branched; including from the base), pyramidal (upright-oval) to rounded, fine-textured, annual species with a distinct taproot. The species exhibits considerable phenotypic variability. Although the species exhibits considerable phenotypic variability, the form is typically upright-oval to rounded, especially for the cultivated varieties grown as landscape plants. Family: Amaranthaceae (Pigweed/Amaranth Family); formerly in the Chenopodiaceae (Goosefoot Family) which has recently been merged with the Amaranthaceae. Habitat: Although the species is native to Eurasia, it has been distributed worldwide by human activities. In North America Mexican fireweed has escaped cultivation and is sometimes found as a weed in disturbed (ruderal) grassland (including rangeland), prairie, and desert shrub ecosystems, in agricultural systems as both a crop and a weed, and in waste places.
    [Show full text]
  • Germination and Seedling Establishment of Spiny Hopsage (Grayia Spinosa [Hook.] Moq.)
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Nancy L. Shaw for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Crop and Soil Sciences presented on March 19, 1992 Title: Germination and Seedling Establishment of Spiny Hopsage (Grayia Spinosa [Hook.] Moq.) Abstract approved:_Redactedfor Privacy von r. ULdUe Reestablishment of spiny hopsage(Grayia spinosa [Hook.] Moq.) where depleted or lost on shrub steppe sites can improve forage, plant cover, and soil stabilization. The objectives of this study were to: 1) determine direct-seeding requirements; 2) develop optimum germination pretreatments; and 3) examine dormancy mechanisms in spiny hopsage fruits and seeds. The effects of seed source, planting date,and site preparation method onseed germination and seedling establishment (SE) were examined at Birds of Prey and Reynolds Creek in southwestern Idaho. Three seed sources were planted on rough or compact seedbeds on 4 dates in 1986-87 and 3 dates in 1987-88. Exposure to cool-moist environments improved spring SE from early fall (EF) and late fall (LF) plantings. Few seedlings emerged from early (ESp) or late spring (LSp) plantings. SE was low at: 1 site in 1986-87 and atboth sites in 1987-88, probably due to lack of precipitation. For the successful 1986-87 planting, seedling density was greater on rough compared to compact seedbeds in April andMay, possiblydue to improved microclimate conditions. Growth rate varied among seed sources, but seedlings developed a deep taproot (mean length 266 mm) with few lateral roots the first season. Seeds were planted on 3 dates in 1986-87 and 1987-88, andnylon bags containing seeds were planted on 4 dates each year to study microenvironment effects on germination (G), germination rate (GR), and SE.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]