DOCSLIB.ORG

Computer Science Aalborg University Advisor: Prof

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Computer Science Aalborg University Advisor: Prof Computer Science Research Evaluation 2001–2005 Department of Computer Science Fredrik Bajers Vej 7E DK 9220 Aalborg Ø Denmark Aalborg University Computer Science, Aalborg University—Research Evaluation 2001–2005 Edited by Josva Kleist Cover design by Jens Lindberg Printed by UNI.PRINT Copyright c 2006 by Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University. All rights reserved. Preface It is the policy of the Faculty of Engineering and Science at Aalborg University that its research units are to be evaluated every five years. Following that policy, the present report documents the fourth research evaluation of the Department of Computer Science and covers the period 2001–2005. According to the Faculty’s guidelines, the objectives of the evaluation are three- fold. The first is to assess whether there is a satisfactory agreement between allo- cated internal and external research resources and the research accomplished. The second is to determine whether the Department’s actual research efforts are consis- tent with its goals and plans for the period, as they are expressed in the long-term research plans of the Faculty of Engineering and Science. As the third objective, the evaluation is intended to aid the Department in planning its future research efforts. Realizing that a research evaluation itself is a learning experience that pro- vides an opportunity to rise above the daily routine and reflect upon research, we agreed upon an additional objective. Within the Department, the evaluation—the process as well as the final report—should constructively aid the staff members in evaluating and improving their effectiveness as researchers, as group leaders, and as administrators of research at the departmental level. In particular, the evalua- tion presents an opportunity to assess the effectiveness of departmental policy in promoting high quality research. The research evaluation process that has led to the production of this document began in Early 2005, when the Department’s research leaders (professors Christian S. Jensen, Finn V. Jensen, and Kim G. Larsen and associate professor Jan Stage) and the head of department (Peter A. Nielsen) initiated discussions on the struc- ture of the process. Among the early, important tasks, a five-member evaluation committee was appointed. Professor Christian S. Jensen accepted to be the local member of the committee (being local, he would be without a vote). The Department was delighted when Professor Stefan Arnborg (KTH, Swe- den), Director Keith Jeffery (Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK), Professor Tho- mas Sinkjær (Center for Sensory-Motoer Interaction, AAU, Denmark), and Pro- fessor Ian Sommerville (Lancaster University, UK) agreed to be on the committee. We felt that this committee of recognized and experienced senior scientists and re- search leaders would be able to cover all the rather diverse research areas in the Department and provide an insightful and wide-ranging evaluation. (Short curric- ula vitae of the members of the evaluation committee may be found in Chapter 2.) Next, the general structure of the evaluation process and of this report were agreed upon. The structure of the evaluation report was based on that of its pre- decessor, the main novelty being that the printed report does not include all the background material provided to the committee by the research groups. The contributions by the Department’s research groups to the evaluation report i ii went through discussions within the department. This process was useful, as it in- variably raised questions about the research approaches, results, and organization of the research groups that were not addressed at first. The contributions that re- sulted from this process were then collected in a preliminary evaluation report. I was given the responsibility of steering the process, coordinating with Christian S. Jensen when appropriate, and of editing the report. Each research group appointed an editor responsible for providing the group’s contribution. By early December 2005, a 347-page preliminary report (on which Part II of this report is based) was completed and sent to the evaluation committee members. In January 2006, a two-day research evaluation seminar was held at a confer- ence facility. All research staff, including Ph.D. students, long-term visitors, and technical and administrative staff from the Department were invited. On the first day, the Department’s research groups gave oral presentations of their research, allowing the committee and other attendees to ask questions on both the presen- tations and the preliminary report. During the afternoon of the first day, and part of the morning of the second, the evaluation committee worked separately (apart from a discussion with the research group leaders during which the overall orga- nization of the Department was clarified to the committee), and the attendees took part in various activities related to the general theme of research evaluation. At the end of the seminar, the committee presented its evaluation to the Department and answered questions. Following the seminar, the evaluation committee finalized its written evalua- tion, which forms Chapter 3 of this document. In parallel, the research units pro- duced final versions of their contributions. It is those slightly updated descriptions that, possibly subjected to some minor editing, appear in Part II of this report. Part I of this report contains the actual evaluation of the Department’s research. It provides a brief description of the formal context of the evaluation, short cur- ricula vitae of the members of the committee, and then presents the committee’s evaluation. Part II has a chapter for the Department in general and one for each research group. It covers the background and organizational context of the Department and the overall organization of the Department’s research. Finally, it evaluates the overall administration and organization of research and presents a plan for the period 2006–2010. In their chapter, each research group provides an overview of its profile, summarizes the research goals, and present the activities and results for the period. Finally, a self-evaluation and plans for the next period are given. Detailed descriptions of activities and results and descriptions of organization and staff, Ph.D. projects, research collaborations, service and other research-related activities, and a bibliography then follow in an appendix. Part III provides a brief summary in Danish of the report. Designing the research evaluation and producing this report was intrinsically a consensual and collective effort involving to varying degrees all the researchers in the Department. I thank them all for their assistance and support. However, the editor for each group: Linas Bukauskas, Hans Huttel,¨ Manfred Jaeger, and Jesper iii Kjeldskov deserve special thanks for their work as editors of the contributions by the research groups. Luca Aceto, who edited the previous evaluation report, made my editorial work much easier by providing the LATEX files used for the previous report. The cover page of the report was designed by Jens Lindberg. Any infelicity in this report is solely the editor’s responsibility. Aalborg, Denmark JOSVA KLEIST March, 2006 iv Contents I The Evaluation and its Framework 1 1 Evaluation Guidelines 3 2 The Evaluation Committee 5 3 Evaluation Report 9 3.1 Summary . 9 3.2 Introduction . 9 3.3 The Research groups . 10 3.3.1 Database and Programming Technologies . 11 3.3.2 Distributed Systems and Semantics . 12 3.3.3 Information Systems . 12 3.3.4 Machine Intelligence . 14 3.4 Growth and expansion . 15 3.5 Organisational structure . 16 3.6 The review process . 16 3.7 Conclusions . 17 II The Department’s Research Report 19 4 The Department of Computer Science 21 4.1 Introduction . 21 4.2 Background, Conditions, and Funding . 21 4.2.1 Computer Science at Aalborg University . 21 4.2.2 A Brief History of the Department . 22 4.2.3 Research Funding . 23 4.3 The Department’s Organisation . 24 4.3.1 Research Groups . 24 4.3.2 Research-Based Education . 25 4.3.3 Ph.D. studies . 26 4.3.4 Collaboration with IT Industry: Nouhauz . 27 4.4 Own Evaluation of the Department . 27 4.4.1 Strategy . 28 4.4.2 New Leadership . 30 4.4.3 New Initiatives . 31 v vi Contents 5 Database and Programming Technologies 33 5.1 Excecutive Summary . 33 5.2 Profile of the Group . 33 5.2.1 Research Profile . 33 5.2.2 Staff . 34 5.3 Research Goals 2001–05 . 36 5.4 Activities and Results . 37 5.4.1 Mobile Internet Services . 37 5.4.2 Additional, Planned Research Areas . 39 5.4.3 New Research Initiatives . 41 5.5 The Group’s Own Evaluation . 42 5.6 Research Plan 2006–2010 . 48 5.6.1 General Considerations . 48 5.6.2 Focus Areas . 49 5.7 Detailed Description of Activities and Results . 55 5.7.1 Funded Projects . 55 5.7.2 Specific Projects . 65 5.8 Organization and Staff . 67 5.9 Ph.D. Projects . 79 5.9.1 Project Descriptions . 79 5.10 Collaboration . 98 5.10.1 Collaborations with Academia . 98 5.10.2 Collaborations with State Agencies . 100 5.10.3 Industry Collaboration . 100 5.10.4 Visits at Other Institutions . 102 5.10.5 Industry Collaboration Through Student Projects . 102 5.11 Services . 103 5.11.1 Program Committees . 103 5.11.2 Conference Related Services . 111 5.11.3 Invited Talks . 112 5.11.4 Editorial Services . 118 5.11.5 Reviews . 118 5.11.6 Evaluation Committees . 123 5.11.7 Consulting . 127 5.11.8 Boards of Directors and Advisory Boards and Committees 127 5.11.9 General . 128 5.12 Bibliography . 129 5.12.1 Coverage . 129 5.12.2 Refereeing and Acceptance Rates . 130 5.12.3 Notes Concerning Citations . 130 5.12.4 Edited Books .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Du Genie Logiciel Pour Deployer, Gerer Et Reconfigurer Les Logiciels Fabien Dagnat
    Du genie logiciel pour deployer, gerer et reconfigurer les logiciels Fabien Dagnat To cite this version: Fabien Dagnat. Du genie logiciel pour deployer, gerer et reconfigurer les logiciels. Interface homme- machine [cs.HC]. Télécom Bretagne; Institut Mines-Télécom, 2016. tel-01323059 HAL Id: tel-01323059 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01323059 Submitted on 30 May 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Habilitation à Diriger les Recherches de l’Université de Rennes 1 Du génie logiciel pour déployer, gérer et reconfigurer les logiciels Fabien Dagnat IRISA, Équipe PASS Soutenue le 15 janvier 2016 à Télécom Bretagne, site de Brest devant le jury composé de Olivier Barais Professeur de l’Université de Rennes 1 Président Laurence Duchien Professeur de l’Université de Lille 1 Rapporteur Vincent Englebert Professeur de l’Université de Namur Rapporteur Daniel Le Berre Professeur de l’Université d’Artois Rapporteur Frédéric Boniol Maître de Recherche à l’ONERA et Professeur Membre de l’INP de Toulouse Antoine Beugnard Professeur à Télécom Bretagne Membre Remerciements Tous mes remerciements aux nombreuses personnes que j’ai croisée et avec qui j’ai travaillé.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5014 Commenced Publication in 1973 Founding and Former Series Editors: Gerhard Goos, Juris Hartmanis, and Jan Van Leeuwen
    Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5014 Commenced Publication in 1973 Founding and Former Series Editors: Gerhard Goos, Juris Hartmanis, and Jan van Leeuwen Editorial Board David Hutchison Lancaster University, UK Takeo Kanade Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Josef Kittler University of Surrey, Guildford, UK Jon M. Kleinberg Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine, CA, USA Friedemann Mattern ETH Zurich, Switzerland John C. Mitchell Stanford University, CA, USA Moni Naor Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Oscar Nierstrasz University of Bern, Switzerland C. Pandu Rangan Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India Bernhard Steffen University of Dortmund, Germany Madhu Sudan Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA, USA Demetri Terzopoulos University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Doug Tygar University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA Gerhard Weikum Max-Planck Institute of Computer Science, Saarbruecken, Germany Jorge Cuellar Tom Maibaum Kaisa Sere (Eds.) FM 2008: Formal Methods 15th International Symposium on Formal Methods Turku, Finland, May 26-30, 2008 Proceedings 13 Volume Editors Jorge Cuellar Siemens Corporate Technology Otto-Hahn-Ring 6 81730 München, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Tom Maibaum McMaster University Software Quality Research Laboratory and Department of Computing and Software 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada E-mail: [email protected] Kaisa Sere Åbo Akademi University Department of Information Technology 20520 Turku, Finland E-mail: kaisa.sere@abo.fi Library of Congress Control Number: 2008927062 CR Subject Classification (1998): D.2, F.3, D.3, D.1, J.1, K.6, F.4 LNCS Sublibrary: SL 2 – Programming and Software Engineering ISSN 0302-9743 ISBN-10 3-540-68235-X Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York ISBN-13 978-3-540-68235-6 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Model-Based Development of Network-On-Chip Systems
    Formal Model-Based Development of Network-on-Chip Systems Leonidas Tsiopoulos Åbo Akademi University Department of Information Technologies Joukahaisenkatu 3-5 A, 20520 Turku, Finland 2010 Supervised by Professor Kaisa Sere Department of Information Technologies Åbo Akademi University Joukahaisenkatu 3-5 A, FI-20520 Turku Finland Reviewed by Professor Jüri Vain Department of Computer Science Tallinn University of Technology Raja 15, 12618 Tallinn Estonia Senior Researcher, Ph.D. Pasi Liljeberg Department of Information Technology University of Turku FI-20014, Turku Finland Opponent Professor Jüri Vain Department of Computer Science Tallinn University of Technology Raja 15, 12618 Tallinn Estonia ISBN 978-952-12-2438-6 Painosalama Oy – Turku, Finland 2010 Abstract Advances in technology allow us to have thousands of computational and storage modules communicating with each other on a single electronic chip. Well defined intercommunication schemes for such Systems–on–Chip are fundamental for handling the increasing complexity. So called bus–based and bus matrix–based communication frameworks for Systems–on–Chip face immense pressure of the increasing size and complexity, unable to offer the scalability required. The Network–on–Chip communication paradigm for Systems–on–Chip has been introduced to answer the given challenges offering very high communication bandwidth and network scalability through its generally regular structure. The communication between the modules of a System–on–Chip is generally categorised as synchronous or asynchronous, with a recent shift towards Globally Asynchronous Locally Synchronous Systems–on–Chip. In such systems each module can be synchronised to a private local clock but their intercommunication is established asynchronously, relying on request and acknowledgement communication handshakes.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2014 FACS a C T S
    Issue 2014-1 August 2014 FACS A C T S The Newsletter of the Formal Aspects of Computing Science (FACS) Specialist Group ISSN 0950-1231 FACS FACTS Issue 2014-1 August 2014 About FACS FACTS FACS FACTS (ISSN: 0950-1231) is the newsletter of the BCS Specialist Group on Formal Aspects of Computing Science (FACS). FACS FACTS is distributed in electronic form to all FACS members. Submissions to FACS FACTS are always welcome. Please visit the newsletter area of the BCS FACS website for further details (see http://www.bcs.org/category/12461). Back issues of FACS FACTS are available for download from: http://www.bcs.org/content/conWebDoc/33135 The FACS FACTS Team Newsletter Editors Tim Denvir [email protected] Brian Monahan [email protected] Editorial Team Jonathan Bowen, Tim Denvir. Brian Monahan, Margaret West. Contributors to this Issue Jonathan Bowen, Tim Denvir, Eerke Boiten, Rob Heirons, Azalea Raad, Andrew Robinson. BCS-FACS websites BCS: http://www.bcs-facs.org LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2427579 Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/BCS- FACS/120243984688255 Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BCS-FACS If you have any questions about BCS-FACS, please send these to Paul Boca <[email protected]> 2 FACS FACTS Issue 2014-1 August 2014 Editorial Welcome to issue 2014-1 of FACS FACTS. This is the first issue produced by your new joint editors, Tim Denvir and Brian Monahan. One effect of the maturity of formal methods is that researchers in the topic regularly grow old and expire. Rather than fill the issue with Obituaries, we have taken the course of reporting on most of these sad events in brief, with references to fuller obituaries that can be found elsewhere, in particular in the FAC Journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaisa Sere: in Memoriam
    DOI 10.1007/s00165-013-0292-5 BCS © 2013 Formal Aspects Formal Aspects of Computing (2014) 26: 197–201 of Computing Kaisa Sere: In Memoriam Luigia Petre, Elena Troubitsyna, and Marina Waldén Department of Information Technologies, Åbo Akademi University, Joukahaisenkatu 3-5A, 20520, Turku, Finland Kaisa Sere, a wonderful person and scientist, passed away on December 5, 2012, after a long and devastating illness. Apart from her husband Thorbjörn Andersson and the rest of her family, Kaisa is going to be missed by so many colleagues in Finland and worldwide. Kaisa was born in 1954 in Kokkola, Finland. She graduated from Åbo Akademi University with a M.Sc. in Mathematics and received a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the same university in 1990. She was a lecturer at Ohio State University, US, during 1984 –1985 and a post-doctoral researcher in the Department of Computer Science, at Utrecht University, the Netherlands, during 1991–1992. She held an Associate Professorship at the University of Kuopio, in the Department of Com- puter Science and Applied Mathematics, during 1993–1998, she became a Docent of Computer Science at the same department in 1997, and held a senior research professorship from the Academy of Finland during 1998–1999. She became a full professor of Computer Science and Engineering at Åbo Akademi University on August 1st, 1998. During 2010– 2011, she also held a senior researcher position from the Academy of Finland and a vice-rectorship at Åbo Akademi University. One of the major contributions of Kaisa Sere’s career was made to the refinement research.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Scalable Modeling of Biology in Event-B 3
    Towards Scalable Modeling of Biology in Event-B Usman Sanwal1, Thai Son Hoang2, Luigia Petre1, and Ion Petre3,4 1 Faculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, Finland 2 School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, UK 3 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, Finland 4 National Institute for Research and Development in Biological Sciences, Romania Abstract. Biology offers many examples of large-scale, complex, con- current systems: many processes take place in parallel, compete on re- sources and influence each other’s behavior. The scalable modeling of biological systems continues to be a very active field of research. In this paper we introduce a new approach based on Event-B, a state-based for- mal method with refinement as its central ingredient, allowing us to check for model consistency step-by-step in an automated way. Our approach based on functions leads to an elegant and concise modeling method. We demonstrate this approach by constructing what is, to our knowledge, the largest ever built Event-B model, describing the ErbB signaling path- way, a key evolutionary pathway with a significant role in development and in many types of cancer. The Event-B model for the ErbB pathway describes 1320 molecular reactions through 242 events. 1 Introduction Biological systems are typically very large and complex, so much that it is re- markably difficult to capture all the necessary details in one modeling step. The concept of refinement – gradually adding details to a model while preserving its consistency – is thus instrumental and it has been shown before, in our [29] and related research [9,10,11,16], to bring value to biological modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • B5 EKOSKIVAARA Pmaanantai
    _______________________________________________________ Eija Koskivaara Artificial Neural Networks for Analytical Review in Auditing ______________________________________________________ Sarja / Series Ae-7:2004 (pdf) A-7:2004 (nid.) ISBN: 951-564-185-3 (pdf) 951-564-184-5 (nid.) ISSN: 1459-4870 (pdf) 0357-4652 (nid.) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Orienteering in the research world is challenging and sometimes lonely. For me this journey has been fun as well as educational. I have received a lot of support from various people and organisations. My supervisor, Professor Barbro Back has supported me in numerous ways. Her interests in my research and recommendations have been of critical importance to me. Furthermore, I acknowledge all the valuable advice on society of science and the encouragement she gave me, not only as a supervisor but also as a real friend. Rector, Professor Tapio Reponen has offered me a lot of tacit and explicit knowledge to find the right way whenever I got lost. It was an honour for me that he accepted the invitation to act as an esteemed custodian in the public examination of my thesis. I sincerely thank the official examiners of this study, Professor Teija Laitinen and Professor Ari Visa, for their time and excellent comments that helped me a lot. I specially want to thank the Director of Rutgers Accounting Research Center, Professor Miklos Vasarhelyi, who accepted the invitation to act as an esteemed opponent of my thesis. I thank the researchers and administrative staff of Information System Science at the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration for creating a positive and helpful working environment. Special thanks go to the Head of the Department of Management, Professor Hannu Salmela and Professor Reima Suomi for their continuous support to my research work and to Secretary Birgit Haanmäki for taking care of many practical things.
    [Show full text]
  • Model-Driven Software Development
    Model-Driven Software Development Stephen W. Liddle 1 Introduction Software development is a complex and difficult task that requires the in- vestment of significant resources and carries major risk of failure. According to its proponents, model-driven (MD) software development approaches are improving the way we build software. Model-driven approaches putatively increase developer productivity, decrease the cost (in time and money) of software construction, improve software reusability, and make software more maintainable. Likewise, model-driven techniques promise to aid in the early detection of defects such as design flaws, omissions, and misunderstandings between clients and developers. The promises of MD are rather lofty, and so it is only natural to find many skeptics. As Brooks famously described [Bro95], software engineering will not likely deliver the sort of productivity gains we experience in hardware engineering where we see \Moore's law"-styled doublings every 24 months [Moo10]. Thus, if we accept Brooks' premise, nobody should expect any innovative approach to software development to be a \magical silver bullet" that will increase productivity by an order of magnitude within a decade. Unfortunately, the amount of hyperbole surrounding the various flavors of MD sometimes makes it seem like advocates believe MD to be a silver bullet. Model-driven devel- opment is no panacea. However, we believe that model-driven is a superior approach to software construction. This chapter examines the current state of the art in model-driven software development. We begin by characterizing the various approaches to model-driven devel- opment (Section 2). Then we examine what modeling is and why we engage in modeling (Section 3).
    [Show full text]
  • About the Contributors
    500 About the Contributors Luigia Petre is a university lecturer at Åbo Akademi University, Department of Information Tech- nologies, Turku, Finland. She got her PhD in Computer Science in 2005 on modeling techniques in formal methods. Her research interests include energy modeling, network availability, integration of formal methods, and time and space dependent computing. She has co-organized major conferences in her field such as the Integrated Formal Methods (IFM) 2002 as well as Formal Methods (FM) 2008. She has been in the programme committee of IFM in 2002, 2004, 2005, and 2007. Currently, she is coordi- nating NODES - a Nordic Dependability Network, concerned with deploying a dependability curriculum for the Nordic countries. She is a researcher in the EC-funded project DEPLOY. She has about 30 ref- ereed publications. Kaisa Sere is a Professor of Computer Science and Engineering at Åbo Akademi University since 1997. She got her PhD in 1990 on the formal design of parallel algorithms from Åbo Akademi University. Between 1993-97, she was Associate Professor in Computer Science at University of Kuopio. She is the founder and leader of the Distributed Systems Laboratory that contains about 25 researchers. Her current research interests are within the design of dependable distributed systems, especially refinement-based approaches to the construction of systems ranging from pure software to hardware and digital circuits. Her research has been supported by the Academy of Finland as well as by the EU framework programmes 5 to 7 with several grants. She has organised several summer schools, conferences, and workshops within her research areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Stepwise Refinement of Heap-Manipulating Code in Chalice
    Stepwise Refinement of Heap-Manipulating Code in Chalice Manuscript KRML 211 – December 23, 2011 K. Rustan M. Leino0 and Kuat Yessenov1 ? 0 Microsoft Research, Redmond, CA, USA [email protected] 1 MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Cambridge, MA, USA [email protected] Abstract. Stepwise refinement is a well-studied technique for developing a pro- gram from an abstract description to a concrete implementation. This paper de- scribes a system with automated tool support for refinement, powered by a state- of-the-art verification engine that uses an SMT solver. Unlike previous refine- ment systems, users of the presented system interact only via declarations in the programming language. Another aspect of the system is that it accounts for dy- namically allocated objects in the heap, so that data representations in an abstract program can be refined into ones that use more objects. Finally, the system uses a language with familiar imperative features, including sequential composition, loops, and recursive calls, offers a syntax with skeletons for describing program changes between refinements, and provides a mechanism for supplying witnesses when refining non-deterministic programs. 0 Introduction The prevalent style of programming today uses low-level programming languages (like C or Java) into which programmers encode the high-level design or informal specifi- cations they have in mind. From a historical perspective, it makes sense that this style would have come from the view that what the programming language provides is a de- scription of the data structures and code that the executing program will use. However, upon reflection, the style seems far from ideal, for several reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Software Engineering Challenges for Ubiquitous Computing
    Workshop on Software Engineering Challenges for Ubiquitous Computing June 1st – 2nd 2006 Lancaster University Supported by Edited by Gerd Kortuem SEUC 2006 Workshop Programme Session 1 Engineering for real – The SECOAS project I. W. Marshall, A. E. Gonzalez, I. D. Henning, N. Boyd, C. M. Roadknight, J. Tateson, L. Sacks Analysing Infrastructure and Emergent System Character for Ubiquitous Computing Software Engineering Martin Randles, A. Taleb-Bendiab Software Considerations for Automotive Pervasive Systems Ross Shannon, Aaron Quigley, Paddy Nixon Session 2: Programming Ambient-Oriented Programming: Language Support to Program the Disappearing Computer Jessie Dedecker, Tom Van Cutsem, Stijn Mostinckx, Wolfgang De Meuter, Theo D'Hondt A Top-Down Approach to Writing Software for Networked Ubiquitous Systems Urs Bischoff Context-Aware Error Recovery in Mobile Software Engineering Nelio Cacho, Sand Correa, Alessandro Garcia, Renato Cerqueira, Thais Batista Towards Effective Exception Handling Engineering in Ubiquitous Mobile Software Systems Nelio Cacho, Alessandro Garcia, Alexander Romanovsky, Alexei Iliasov Session 3: Formal Methods Towards Rigorous Engineering of Resilient Ubiquitous Systems Alexander Romanovsky, Kaisa Sere, Elena Troubitsyna Controlling Feature Interactions In Ubiquitous Computing Environments Tope Omitola Dependability Challenge in Ubiquitous Computing Kaisa Sere, Lu Yan, Mats Neovius Concurrency on and off the sensor network node Matthew C. Jadud, Christian L. Jacobsen, Damian J. Dimmich Session 4: Model-based Approaches
    [Show full text]
  • FM2009 Is the Sixteenth Symposium in a Series of the Formal Methods Europe Association
    16TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON FORMAL METHODS NOVEMBER 2-6, 2009 • TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITEIT EINDHOVEN • THE NETHERLANDS FM2009 is the sixteenth symposium in a series of the Formal Methods Europe association. The symposium will be organized as a world congress. Ten years after FM'99 in Toulouse, the first world congress, the formal methods communities from all over the world will again have the opportunity to meet. Therefore, FM2009 will be both an occasion to celebrate, and a platform for enthusiastic researchers and practitioners from a diversity of backgrounds and schools to exchange their ideas and share their experience. Reflecting the global span of FM2009, the Programme Committee has been recruited from all over the world (see overleaf). For the technical symposium, papers on every aspect of the development and application of formal methods for the improvement of the cur- rent practice on system developments are invited for submission. Of particular interest are papers on tools and industrial applications: there will be a special track devoted to this topic. INVITED SPEAKERS The proceedings of FM2009 will be published in Springer's Lec- Wan Fokkink, NL ture Notes in Computer Science series. Submitted papers should not Carroll Morgan, Australia have been submitted elsewhere for publication, should be in Springer's Colin O'Halloran, UK LNCS format (as described in: www.springer.com/lncs), and should Sriram Rajamani, India not exceed 16 pages including appendices. Please note that an ac- Jeannette Wing, USA cepted paper will be published in the Proceedings only if at least one of its authors attends the symposium, in order to present their PC CHAIRS accepted work.
    [Show full text]