DOCSLIB.ORG

Geophysics 525: Tectonophysics Spring 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geophysics 525: Tectonophysics Spring 2011 Geophysics 525: Tectonophysics Spring 2011 Course Information Lecture: Tuesdays and Thursdays 9:30 am – 10:45 am, MSEC 195 Instructors: Susan Bilek and Glenn Spinelli Contact Info: phone 835-6510, office MSEC 358, email [email protected] phone 835-6512, office MSEC 360, email [email protected] Office Hours: (SB) Tuesdays 1:30-3:30 pm or by appointment (GS) Tuesdays 11-12 pm, Thursdays 2-3 pm or by appt. Course Objectives The fundamental objective is to learn about the forces that shape and have shaped our planet. Geodynamical processes have significant spatial and temporal scales, from rock and crystal deformation to plate motions and from minutes to millions of years. You will learn about the observations that have provided the basic understanding of the dynamics of our planet as well as the theoretical background to help interpret the observations. You will be expected to demonstrate your ability to solve geodynamic problems given various datasets and the background that you learn in this class. In addition, you will be required to read current research articles and synthesize the content into brief summaries and final project. Course Materials Required Text: Geodynamics, 2nd edition, Turcotte and Schubert, Cambridge University Press, 2002 Course Website: www.ees.nmt.edu/Geop/Classes/Geop525/ Links to exercises and data will be provided on the class website as needed. Library Website: http://infohost.nmt.edu/~nmtlib/ Use to access electronic databases and journal articles. Lectures: Lecture material will be derived from your textbook and other sources, so it is in your best interest to attend lecture. Grading Policy Homeworks: 40% Midterm Project: 10% Paper Reviews: 20% Final Project (including intermediate items): 30% Assignments Homeworks: Bi-weekly homework assignments will be assigned and will relate to both the reading and lectures. Note that significant partial credit will be given, so it is very important to show all the steps leading to final answers. Some homework assignments will require computer analysis of data provided in class using MATLAB. See me if you need to set up access for computers to use MATLAB. Midterm project: Both instructors will be unavailable during a period in mid-late February. This time is estimated on the syllabus, but may shift slightly. During this period, you will be expected to spend the course time to work on a flexure-related assignment and short 10-12 minute presentation to the class defending your results. Paper reviews: During the term, you will read 2 short research papers (on different topics) of your choosing related to material discussed in this class. Your assignment is to write a short review (2 typed pages) of the paper, providing a short summary of the paper as well as the question it addresses and the answers it provides. Feel free to provide criticisms of the paper as well. To find short papers, look in journals Nature, Science, Geology, and Geophysical Research Letters, available either online or in the Tech library. Limit your search for papers within the last year. In addition, you should be prepared to give a 5 minute (maximum) summary of the paper to the class on the day the summary is due. Final project: In lieu of a final exam, you will complete a final project. This project is to explore one of the topics from class as related to a planetary body other than the Earth. This project will entail writing a short (5-6 page) paper and preparing a 25 minute powerpoint presentation for the end of the semester. The paper should follow the format of a paper in Geophysical Research Letters (you can look at the AGU website or a copy of the journal to find examples of the format and reference style). You will also turn in and be graded on the powerpoint presentation. Be sure to properly reference all the articles used in your project (hopefully you know by this point that direct copying from sources is plagarism and can lead to failure of the course - for questions come see me!). See the project description handout for more details. Late policy Extension requests due to emergencies must be made before the due date. Penalties of 10% per day will be applied for late assignments. This means point values for homework assignments that are turned in after the class meeting time start at 90 instead of 100. Academic Honesty I expect that you turn in your own work on homeworks, midterm exercise, reviews, and final project. You may discuss topics with other students, but you must write up your own work. Problems with cheating or plagiarism will lead to a failing grade in the course. Schedule of Topics Date Topic Readings Assignments Due Week 01/18/11 Course Intro + features of 1-1 to 1-9 1 the earth 01/20/11 Consequences of tectonics 1-10 to 1-14 1 01/25/11 Stress and stress 2-1 to 2-2 2 measurements 01/27/11 Stress and strain 2-3 to 2-7 2 02/01/11 Stress and strain 2-7 to 2-8 Paper Review 1 3 02/03/11 Elastic Deformation 3-1 to 3-9 Homework 1 3 02/08/11 2D Flexure 3-9 4 02/10/11 Flexure applications 3-10 to 3-18 4 02/15/11 TBA 5 02/17/11 TBA Topic due via email 5 02/22/11 TBA 6 02/24/11 TBA 6 03/01/11 Midterm exercise Midterm exercise 7 presentations writeup 03/03/11 Heat conduction, flow, 4-1 to 4-5 Homework 2 7 generation 03/08/11 1,2,3D conduction and 4-6 to 4-12 8 geotherms 03/10/11 Heat -- Geologic examples 4-13 to 4-29 8 03/15/11 NO CLASS – SPRING 9 BREAK 03/17/11 NO CLASS – SPRING 9 BREAK 03/22/11 Intro to gravity and geoid 5-1 to 5-5 Homework 3 10 03/24/11 Gravity Anomalies 5-6 to 5-14 10 03/29/11 1D viscous fluid flow and 6-1 to 6-4 11 pipe flow 03/31/11 2D flow, pipe flow 6-4 to 6-9 Homework 4 11 04/05/11 Postglacial rebound 6-10 12 04/07/11 Plumes and thermal 6-15, 6-18, 6-24 Paper Review 2 12 convection 04/12/11 Rheology 7-1 to 7-5, 7-10, 7-11 13 04/14/11 Crust and mantle rheology 7-6 to 7-9 Homework 5 13 04/19/11 Fault classification and 8-1 to 8-6 First Draft 14 simple friction 04/21/11 Earthquakes and tectonics 8-7 to 8-12 14 04/26/11 Earthquakes and tectonics 8-7 to 8-12 Peer-review Edits 15 04/28/11 Student Presentations 15 05/03/11 Student Presentations Homework 6 16 05/05/11 Class wrap-up Final Paper 16 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assembly, Configuration, and Break-Up History of Rodinia
    Author's personal copy Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Precambrian Research 160 (2008) 179–210 Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: A synthesis Z.X. Li a,g,∗, S.V. Bogdanova b, A.S. Collins c, A. Davidson d, B. De Waele a, R.E. Ernst e,f, I.C.W. Fitzsimons g, R.A. Fuck h, D.P. Gladkochub i, J. Jacobs j, K.E. Karlstrom k, S. Lu l, L.M. Natapov m, V. Pease n, S.A. Pisarevsky a, K. Thrane o, V. Vernikovsky p a Tectonics Special Research Centre, School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia b Department of Geology, Lund University, Solvegatan 12, 223 62 Lund, Sweden c Continental Evolution Research Group, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia d Geological Survey of Canada (retired), 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0E8 e Ernst Geosciences, 43 Margrave Avenue, Ottawa, Canada K1T 3Y2 f Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton U., Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6 g Tectonics Special Research Centre, Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia h Universidade de Bras´ılia, 70910-000 Bras´ılia, Brazil i Institute of the Earth’s Crust SB RAS, Lermontova Street, 128, 664033 Irkutsk, Russia j Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway k Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northrop Hall University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA l Tianjin Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, CGS, No.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 John A. Tarduno
    JOHN A. TARDUNO January, 2016 Professor of Geophysics Tel: 585-275-5713 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Fax: 585-244-5689 University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627 Email: [email protected] USA http://www.ees.rochester.edu/people/faculty/tarduno_john Academic Career: 2005-present Professor of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. 2000-present Professor of Geophysics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. 1998-2006 Chair, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences 1996 Associate Professor of Geophysics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. 1993 Assistant Professor of Geophysics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. 1990 Assistant Research Geophysicist, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, Ca. 1989 National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow, ETH, Zürich, Switzerland 1988 JOI/USSAC Ocean Drilling Fellow, Stanford University, Stanford, Ca. 1987 Ph.D. (Geophysics), Stanford University, Stanford, Ca. 1987 M.S. (Geophysics) Stanford University, Stanford Ca. 1983 B.S. (Geophysics) Lehigh University, Bethlehem Pa. Honors and Awards: Phi Beta Kappa (1983) Fellow, Geological Society of America (1998) JOI/USSAC Distinguished Lecturer (2000-2001) Goergen Award for Distinguished Achievement and Artistry in Undergraduate Teaching (2001) Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of Science (2003) American Geophysical Union/Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Section Bullard Lecturer (2004) Fellow, John Simon Guggenheim Foundation (2006-2007) Edward Peck Curtis Award for
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical Field Mapping
    Presented at Short Course IX on Exploration for Geothermal Resources, organized by UNU-GTP, GDC and KenGen, at Lake Bogoria and Lake Naivasha, Kenya, Nov. 2-23, 2014. Kenya Electricity Generating Co., Ltd. GEOPHYSICAL FIELD MAPPING Anastasia W. Wanjohi, Kenya Electricity Generating Company Ltd. Olkaria Geothermal Project P.O. Box 785-20117, Naivasha KENYA [email protected] or [email protected] ABSTRACT Geophysics is the study of the earth by the quantitative observation of its physical properties. In geothermal geophysics, we measure the various parameters connected to geological structure and properties of geothermal systems. Geophysical field mapping is the process of selecting an area of interest and identifying all the geophysical aspects of the area with the purpose of preparing a detailed geophysical report. The objective of geophysical field work is to understand all physical parameters of a geothermal field and be able to relate them with geological phenomenons and come up with plausible inferences about the system. Four phases are involved and include planning/desktop studies, reconnaissance, actual data aquisition and report writing. Equipments must be prepared and calibrated well. Geophysical results should be processed, analysed and presented in the appropriate form. A detailed geophysical report should be compiled. This paper presents the reader with an overview of how to carry out geophysical mapping in a geothermal field. 1. INTRODUCTION Geophysics is the study of the earth by the quantitative observation of its physical properties. In geothermal geophysics, we measure the various parameters connected to geological structure and properties of geothermal systems. In lay man’s language, geophysics is all about x-raying the earth and involves sending signals into the earth and monitoring the outcome or monitoring natural signals from the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Mantle Flow Through the Northern Cordilleran Slab Window Revealed by Volcanic Geochemistry
    Downloaded from geology.gsapubs.org on February 23, 2011 Mantle fl ow through the Northern Cordilleran slab window revealed by volcanic geochemistry Derek J. Thorkelson*, Julianne K. Madsen, and Christa L. Sluggett Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada ABSTRACT 180°W 135°W 90°W 45°W 0° The Northern Cordilleran slab window formed beneath west- ern Canada concurrently with the opening of the Californian slab N 60°N window beneath the southwestern United States, beginning in Late North Oligocene–Miocene time. A database of 3530 analyses from Miocene– American Holocene volcanoes along a 3500-km-long transect, from the north- Juan Vancouver Northern de ern Cascade Arc to the Aleutian Arc, was used to investigate mantle Cordilleran Fuca conditions in the Northern Cordilleran slab window. Using geochemi- Caribbean 30°N Californian Mexico Eurasian cal ratios sensitive to tectonic affi nity, such as Nb/Zr, we show that City and typical volcanic arc compositions in the Cascade and Aleutian sys- Central African American Cocos tems (derived from subduction-hydrated mantle) are separated by an Pacific 0° extensive volcanic fi eld with intraplate compositions (derived from La Paz relatively anhydrous mantle). This chemically defi ned region of intra- South Nazca American plate volcanism is spatially coincident with a geophysical model of 30°S the Northern Cordilleran slab window. We suggest that opening of Santiago the slab window triggered upwelling of anhydrous mantle and dis- Patagonian placement of the hydrous mantle wedge, which had developed during extensive early Cenozoic arc and backarc volcanism in western Can- Scotia Antarctic Antarctic 60°S ada.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Evolution of the Red Sea: Historical Background, Review and Synthesis
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277310102 Geological Evolution of the Red Sea: Historical Background, Review and Synthesis Chapter · January 2015 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45201-1_3 CITATIONS READS 6 911 1 author: William Bosworth Apache Egypt Companies 70 PUBLICATIONS 2,954 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Near and Middle East and Eastern Africa: Tectonics, geodynamics, satellite gravimetry, magnetic (airborne and satellite), paleomagnetic reconstructions, thermics, seismics, seismology, 3D gravity- magnetic field modeling, GPS, different transformations and filtering, advanced integrated examination. View project Neotectonics of the Red Sea rift system View project All content following this page was uploaded by William Bosworth on 28 May 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Geological Evolution of the Red Sea: Historical Background, Review, and Synthesis William Bosworth Abstract The Red Sea is part of an extensive rift system that includes from south to north the oceanic Sheba Ridge, the Gulf of Aden, the Afar region, the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aqaba, the Gulf of Suez, and the Cairo basalt province. Historical interest in this area has stemmed from many causes with diverse objectives, but it is best known as a potential model for how continental lithosphere first ruptures and then evolves to oceanic spreading, a key segment of the Wilson cycle and plate tectonics.
    [Show full text]
  • Sterngeryatctnphys18.Pdf
    Tectonophysics 746 (2018) 173–198 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Tectonophysics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto Subduction initiation in nature and models: A review T ⁎ Robert J. Sterna, , Taras Geryab a Geosciences Dept., U Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA b Institute of Geophysics, Dept. of Earth Sciences, ETH, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: How new subduction zones form is an emerging field of scientific research with important implications for our Plate tectonics understanding of lithospheric strength, the driving force of plate tectonics, and Earth's tectonic history. We are Subduction making good progress towards understanding how new subduction zones form by combining field studies to Lithosphere identify candidates and reconstruct their timing and magmatic evolution and undertaking numerical modeling (informed by rheological constraints) to test hypotheses. Here, we review the state of the art by combining and comparing results coming from natural observations and numerical models of SI. Two modes of subduction initiation (SI) can be identified in both nature and models, spontaneous and induced. Induced SI occurs when pre-existing plate convergence causes a new subduction zone to form whereas spontaneous SI occurs without pre-existing plate motion when large lateral density contrasts occur across profound lithospheric weaknesses of various origin. We have good natural examples of 3 modes of subduction initiation, one type by induced nu- cleation of a subduction zone (polarity reversal) and two types of spontaneous nucleation of a subduction zone (transform collapse and plumehead margin collapse). In contrast, two proposed types of subduction initiation are not well supported by natural observations: (induced) transference and (spontaneous) passive margin collapse.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Measured Ionospheric Magnetic Field Variations Over Natural Hazards Sites
    remote sensing Article Satellite Measured Ionospheric Magnetic Field Variations over Natural Hazards Sites Christoph Schirninger 1,†, Hans U. Eichelberger 1,*,†, Werner Magnes 1 , Mohammed Y. Boudjada 1,†, Konrad Schwingenschuh 1,†, Andreas Pollinger 1, Bruno P. Besser 1, Pier F. Biagi 2 , Maria Solovieva 3, Jindong Wang 4, Bingjun Cheng 4, Bin Zhou 4, Xuhui Shen 5, Magda Delva 1 and Roland Lammegger 6 1 Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstraße 6, 8042 Graz, Austria; [email protected] (C.S.); [email protected] (W.M.); [email protected] (M.Y.B.); [email protected] (K.S.); [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (B.P.B.); [email protected] (M.D.) 2 Department of Physics, University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy; [email protected] 3 Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, 123995 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 4 National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; [email protected] (J.W.); [email protected] (B.C.); [email protected] (B.Z.) 5 National Institute of Natural Hazards, MEMC, Beijing 100085, China; [email protected] 6 Institute of Experimental Physics, Graz University of Technology, 8010 Graz, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Citation: Schirninger, C.; Eichelberger, H.U.; Magnes, W.; Abstract: Processes and threats related to natural hazards play an important role in the evolution of Boudjada, M.Y.; Schwingenschuh, K.; the Earth and in human history.
    [Show full text]
  • TECTONOPHYSICS the International Journal of Integrated Solid Earth Sciences
    TECTONOPHYSICS The International Journal of Integrated Solid Earth Sciences AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK TABLE OF CONTENTS XXX . • Description p.1 • Audience p.2 • Impact Factor p.2 • Abstracting and Indexing p.2 • Editorial Board p.2 • Guide for Authors p.4 ISSN: 0040-1951 DESCRIPTION . The prime focus of Tectonophysics will be high-impact original research and reviews in the fields of kinematics, structure, composition, and dynamics of the solid earth at all scales. Tectonophysics particularly encourages submission of papers based on the integration of a multitude of geophysical, geological, geochemical, geodynamic, and geotectonic methods with focus on: • Kinematics and deformation of the lithosphere based on space geodesy (e.g. GPS, InSAR), neoteoctonic studies, tectonic geomorphology, and geochronology; • Structure, composition, and thermal state of the crust and mantle and their evolution in various time scales based on geophysical and geochemical studies; • Structural geology, folding, faulting, fracturing, analysis of stress and strain, and rock mechanics; • Orogenesis, tectonism, thermochronology, surficial processes, land-climate interactions, and Lithospheric-asthenospheric interactions; • Active tectonics, seismology, mechanisms of earthquakes and volcanism, geological hazards and their societal impacts; • Rheology and numerical modelling of geodynamic processes; • Laboratory measurements of physical and chemical parameters of crustal and mantle rocks, and their application to geophysics and petrology; • Innovative development, including testing, of new methods in geophysics and geodynamics. Tectonophysics welcomes contributions of three types: • Regular papers. • Fast track papers for short, innovative rapid communication, which will usually be reviewed within three weeks after submission. More information about this paper type can be found within the Guide for Authors. • Comprehensive invited review articles which provide an overview of significant subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic and Sedimentary Response of Rivers to Tectonic
    TECTONOPHYSICS ELSEVIER Tectonophysics 305 (1999) 287-306 Geomorphic and sedimentary response of rivers to tectonic deformation: a brief review and critique of a tool for recognizing subtle epeirogenic deformation in modern and ancient settings John Holbrook", S.A. Schunun a Southeast Missouri State University, Department of Geosciences, 1 University Plaza 6500, Cape Girardeau, MO 63701, USA b Colorado State University, Department of Earth Resources, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA Received 28 April 1998; revised version received 30 June 1998; accepted 11 August 1998 Abstract Rivers are extremely sensitive to subtle changes in their grade caused by tectonic tilting. As such, recognition of tectonic tilting effects on rivers, and their resultant sediments, can be a useful tool for identifying the often cryptic warping associated with incipient and smaller-scale epeirogenic deformation in both modern and ancient settings. Tectonic warping may result in either longitudinal (parallel to floodplain orientation) or lateral (normal to floodplain orientation) tilting of alluvial river profiles. Alluvial rivers may respond to deformation of longitudinal profile by: (1) deflection around zones of uplift and into zones of subsidence, (2) aggradation in backtilted and degradation in foretilted reaches, (3) compensation of slope alteration by shifts in channel pattern, (4) increase in frequency of overbank flooding for foretilted and decrease for backtilted reaches, and (5) increased bedload grain size in foretilted reaches and decreased bedload grain size in backtiked reaches. Lateral tilting causes down-tilt avulsion of streams where tilt rates are high, and steady down-tilt migration (combing) where tilt rates are lower. Each of the above effects may have profound impacts on fithofacies geometry and distribution that may potentially be preserved in the rock record.
    [Show full text]
  • Review for Geodynamics & Tectonophysics
    GEODYNAMICS & TECTONOPHYSICS PUBLISHED BY THE INSTITUTE OF THE EARTH’S CRUST SIBERIAN BRANCH OF RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 2011 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 4 PAGES 418–424 DOI:10.5800/GT-2011-2-4-0053 ISSN 2078-502X THE BOOK BY G.R. FOULGER: FROM MELTING ANOMALIES TO HYPOTHESES ON PLATES OR PLUMES? S. V. Rasskazov 1, 2 1Institute of the Earth’s Crust, Siberian Branch of RAS, 664033, Irkutsk, Lermontov street, 128, Russia 2Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, 664003, Irkutsk, Lenin street, 3, Russia Abstract: The book «Plates vs. plumes: a geological controversy» (Fig. 1) is intended for the advanced student who is not satisfied by the present­day interpretation of intraplate volcanism. From systematic descriptions of the geological controversy on the plate and plume hypotheses, it follows that, unlike predictions of the former, those of the latter have not been con­ firmed by observations. Recent intraplate volcanism is explained adequately by models of lithospheric extension and local convection in the upper mantle. Discussion Key words: plates, plumes, hypotheses, intraplate volcanism, models of lithospheric extension, convection. Recommended by K.Zh. Seminsky 11 November 2011 Citation: Rasskasov S.V. The book by G.R. Foulger: from melting anomalies to hypotheses on plates or plumes? // Geodynamics & Tectonophysics. 2011. V. 2. № 4. P. 418–424. doi:10.5800/GT­2011­2­4­0053. КНИГА Ж.Р. ФУЛДЖЕР: ОТ РАСПЛАВНЫХ АНОМАЛИЙ К ПЛИТНЫМ ИЛИ ПЛЮМОВЫМ ГИПОТЕЗАМ? С. В. Рассказов 1, 2 1Институт земной коры СО РАН, 664033, Иркутск, ул. Лермонтова, 128, Россия 2Иркутский государственный университет, 664003, Иркутск, ул. Ленина, 3, Россия Аннотация: Книга «Плиты против плюмов: геологическая полемика» (рис.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological–Tectonic Framework of Solomon Islands, SW Pacific
    ELSEVIER Tectonophysics 301 (1999) 35±60 Geological±tectonic framework of Solomon Islands, SW Paci®c: crustal accretion and growth within an intra-oceanic setting M.G. Petterson a,Ł, T. Babbs b, C.R. Neal c, J.J. Mahoney d, A.D. Saunders b, R.A. Duncan e, D. Tolia a,R.Magua, C. Qopoto a,H.Mahoaa, D. Natogga a a Ministry of Energy Water and Mineral Resources, Water and Mineral Resources Division, P.O. Box G37, Honiara, Solomon Islands b Department of Geology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK c Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA d School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawaii, 2525 Correa Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA e College of Oceanographic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA Received 10 June 1997; accepted 12 August 1998 Abstract The Solomon Islands are a complex collage of crustal units or terrains (herein termed the `Solomon block') which have formed and accreted within an intra-oceanic environment since Cretaceous times. Predominantly Cretaceous basaltic basement sequences are divided into: (1) a plume-related Ontong Java Plateau terrain (OJPT) which includes Malaita, Ulawa, and northern Santa Isabel; (2) a `normal' ocean ridge related South Solomon MORB terrain (SSMT) which includes Choiseul and Guadalcanal; and (3) a hybrid `Makira terrain' which has both MORB and plume=plateau af®nities. The OJPT formed as an integral part of the massive Ontong Java Plateau (OJP), at c. 122 Ma and 90 Ma, respectively, was subsequently affected by Eocene±Oligocene alkaline and alnoitic magmatism, and was unaffected by subsequent arc development.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Tectonic Geomorphology WG 2014
    Report on the activities of the “Tectonic Geomorphology” IAG Working Group 2014 The IAG Working Group “Tectonic Geomorphology” was established during the 8 th International Conference on Geomorphology, held in Paris on August 2013, on proposal of the organizing Committee composed by Monique Fort (Université Diderot Paris VII; France), Giandomenico Fubelli (Universita di Roma TRE, Italy, Jose Miguel Hernadez Hazanon (Universidad de Granata, Spain), Francisco Gutierrez (Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain) and myself (Paola Fredi, La Sapienza Università di Roma). At present researchers from other countries such as China, India, Algeria, Norvegia have joined the WG. Its main aims are: - the methodological improvements as a result of the comparison and integration of different approaches and disciplines; - promoting international cooperation, training activity and thematic workshops. The main activity of the WG since its constitution, has been the organization of a specific session to be held during the 2014 EGU General Assembly, scheduled for the end of April. The session title proposed by the WG was “Intermontane basins: key sites for multidisciplinary approaches to decrypt tectonically active landscapes” The proposal has been accepted. The session comprehends an oral slot (six presentations ) and a poster session (18 posters) and it is scheduled for May 2 nd , following the program enclosed at the end of the report.. As to the future initiatives we are planning the participation to the next Regional IAG Conference and the organization of the WG session, as well as a possible meeting in one of the Countries of the adhering members. RECENT PAPER BY TECTONIC GEOMORPHOLOGY WG MEMBERS Azañón, J.M., García-Mayordomo, J., Insua, J.M., Rodríguez-Peces, M.J.
    [Show full text]