A Union of Circumstance: Chamberlain and Hitler

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Union of Circumstance: Chamberlain and Hitler Name: __________________________________________ Honors History 9 | www.mrtripodi.org A union of circumstance: Chamberlain and Hitler Neville Chamberlain became Prime Minister of Britain on May 28, 1937. Over the next two years Chamberlain's Conservative government became associated with the foreign policy that later became known as appeasement. Chamberlain believed that Germany had been badly treated by the Allies after it was defeated in the First World War. He therefore thought that the German government had genuine grievances and that these needed to be addressed. He also thought that by agreeing to some of the demands being made by Adolf Hitler of Germany and Benito Mussolini of Italy, he could avoid a European war. Anthony Eden, Chamberlain's foreign secretary, did not agree with the policy of appeasement and resigned in February, 1938. Eden was replaced by Lord Halifax who fully supported this policy. Halifax had already developed a good relationship with the German government. After his first visit to Nazi Germany he told his friend, Henry Channon: "He (Halifax) told me he liked all the Nazi leaders, even Goebbels, Neville Chamberlain and he was much impressed, interested and amused by the visit. He thinks the regime absolutely fantastic." Appeasement: 1938 vs. 2008 In November, 1937, Neville Chamberlain sent Lord Halifax to meet Adolf Hitler, Joseph Goebbels and Hermann Goering in Germany. In his diary, “Some seem to believe we should negotiate Lord Halifax records how he told Hitler: "Although there was much in the with terrorists and radicals,” President Bush Nazi system that profoundly offended British opinion, I was not blind to said before the Israeli Parliament. “We have an what he (Hitler) had done for Germany, and to the achievement from his obligation to call this what it is — the false comfort of appeasement.” point of view of keeping Communism out of his country." This was a reference to the fact that Hitler had banned the Communist Party (KPD) in The White House claimed publicly that the Germany and placed its leaders in Concentration Camps. reference was to those — including Jimmy Carter — who had met with Hamas, but an In February, 1938, Adolf Hitler invited Kurt von Schuschnigg, the Austrian administration official acknowledged to Chancellor, to meet him at Berchtesgarden. Hitler demanded concessions reporters that the remarks were meant as a for the Austrian Nazi Party. Schuschnigg refused and after resigning was swipe at the probable Democratic presidential nominee, Barack Obama, who has proposed replaced by Arthur Seyss-Inquart, the leader of the Austrian Nazi Party. On meeting autocratic world leaders “without 13th March, Seyss-Inquart invited the German Army to occupy Austria and preconditions.” proclaimed union with Germany. To appease, according to one concise The union of Germany and Austria (Anschluss) had been specifically dictionary definition, is “to yield or concede to forbidden by the Treaty of Versailles. Some members of the House of belligerent demands, sometimes at the expense of justice or other principles.” Recent debates Commons, including Anthony Eden and Winston Churchill, now called on on the subject generally consist of one side Neville Chamberlain to take action against Adolf Hitler and his Nazi claiming that an appeased enemy is an government. empowered enemy, as proved to be the case with Hitler. Hugh Christie an MI6 agent working based in Berlin, met with Hermann Goering on 3rd February 1937. He immediately reported his conversation Winston Churchill’s famous remark that England had been “offered a choice between with Goering and included information that Germany intended to take war and shame” and by choosing shame would control of Austria and Czechoslovakia. He also told Christie that Germany get war, too, is only the most eloquent mainly wanted "a free hand in Eastern Europe.In March 1938 Hugh Christie expression of what has become a maxim of told the British government that Adolf Hitler would be ousted by the military international diplomacy. if Britain joined forces with Czechoslovakia against Germany. Christie Isaac Chotiner warned that the "crucial question is 'How soon will the next step against May 25, 2008 Czechoslovakia be tried?' ... The probability is that the delay will not exceed New York Times two or three months at most, unless France and England provide the deterrent, for which cooler heads in Germany are praying." International tension increased when Adolf Hitler began demanding that the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia should be under the control of the German government. In an attempt to to solve the crisis, the heads of the governments of Germany, Britain, France and Italy met in Munich in September, 1938. On 29th September, 1938, Adolf Hitler, Neville Chamberlain, Edouard Daladier and Benito Mussolini signed the Munich Agreement which transferred to Germany the Sudetenland, a fortified frontier region that contained a large German-speaking population. When Eduard Benes, Czechoslovakia's head of state, who had Chamberlain, Hitler congratulate each other on the Munich Pact not been invited to Munich, protested at this decision, Chamberlain told him that Britain would be unwilling to go to war over the issue of the Sudetenland. The Munich Agreement was popular with most people in Britain because it appeared to have prevented a war with Germany. However, some politicians, including Winston Churchill and Anthony Eden, attacked the agreement. These critics pointed out that no only had the British government behaved dishonorably, but it had lost the support of Czech Army, one of the best in Europe. One staunch critic of appeasement was the journalist Vernon Bartlett. He was approached by Richard Acland to stand as an anti-Chamberlain candidate at a by-election in Bridgwater. Bartlett agreed and in November, 1938, surprisingly won the previously safe Tory seat. Henry (Chips) Channon, a junior member of the government wrote in his diary: "This is the worst blow the Government has had since 1935". In March, 1939, the German Army seized the rest of Czechoslovakia. In taking this action Adolf Hitler had broken the Munich Agreement. The British prime minister, Neville Chamberlain, now realized that Hitler could not be trusted and his appeasement policy quickly came to an end. The assignment: Neville Chamberlain has a one-word memoir to most historians: "Appeaser". For tomorrow -- using what you know and any research you find necessary -- write a six-word memoir for ten of the historical figures below. Be creative, but make a statement with what you create. Have fun. Neville Chamberlain Emperor Hirohito Hermann Göring Adolf Hitler Hideki Tojo Josef Mengele Joseph Goebbels Edvard Beneš Edouard Daladier Heinrich Himmler Charlie Sheen Hugh Mulcahy Benito Mussolini King Zog Donald Trump Mr. Mandell Franklin D. Roosevelt Francisco Franco Joseph Stalin Henry Wallace Winston Churchill Vyacheslav Molotov Wendell Willkie Kurt von Schuschnigg this idiot .
Recommended publications
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • The Appeal of Fascism to the British Aristocracy During the Inter-War Years, 1919-1939
    THE APPEAL OF FASCISM TO THE BRITISH ARISTOCRACY DURING THE INTER-WAR YEARS, 1919-1939 THESIS PRESENTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OFARTS. By Kenna Toombs NORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY MARYVILLE, MISSOURI AUGUST 2013 The Appeal of Fascism 2 Running Head: THE APPEAL OF FASCISM TO THE BRITISH ARISTOCRACY DURING THE INTER-WAR YEARS, 1919-1939 The Appeal of Fascism to the British Aristocracy During the Inter-War Years, 1919-1939 Kenna Toombs Northwest Missouri State University THESIS APPROVED Date Dean of Graduate School Date The Appeal of Fascism 3 Abstract This thesis examines the reasons the British aristocracy became interested in fascism during the years between the First and Second World Wars. As a group the aristocracy faced a set of circumstances unique to their class. These circumstances created the fear of another devastating war, loss of Empire, and the spread of Bolshevism. The conclusion was determined by researching numerous books and articles. When events required sacrifice to save king and country, the aristocracy forfeited privilege and wealth to save England. The Appeal of Fascism 4 Contents Chapter One Background for Inter-War Years 5 Chapter Two The Lost Generation 1919-1932 25 Chapter Three The Promise of Fascism 1932-1936 44 Chapter Four The Decline of Fascism in Great Britain 71 Conclusion Fascism After 1940 83 The Appeal of Fascism 5 Chapter One: Background for Inter-War Years Most discussions of fascism include Italy, which gave rise to the movement; Spain, which adopted its principles; and Germany, which forever condemned it in the eyes of the world; but few include Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Career of Lola Montez in the American Theatre
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1994 The aC reer of Lola Montez in the American Theatre. Sara Elizabeth Gotcher Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Gotcher, Sara Elizabeth, "The aC reer of Lola Montez in the American Theatre." (1994). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 5727. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/5727 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oratory of Winston Churchill
    This is a repository copy of The oratory of Winston Churchill. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/85035/ Version: Accepted Version Proceedings Paper: Theakston, K orcid.org/0000-0002-9939-7516 (2015) The oratory of Winston Churchill. In: Hayton, R and Crines, AS, (eds.) Conservative orators: From Baldwin to Cameron. Oratory in Conservative Party Politics Conference, 09 Nov 2012, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK. Manchester University Press , pp. 30-46. ISBN 978-0-7190-9724-9 © 2015, Manchester University Press. This is an author produced version of a paper published in Conservative orators: From Baldwin to Cameron. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 1 The Oratory of Winston Churchill Kevin Theakston Winston Churchill has to be ranked as one of the great political orators, his wartime oratory regularly featuring in collections of the ‘great speeches of history’ and his style and rhetorical methods often used as the basis of ‘how to’ advice for budding speech-makers and business executives anxious to project the ‘language of leadership’ (Humes, 1991; Glover, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Arizona
    Erskine Caldwell, Margaret Bourke- White, and the Popular Front (Moscow 1941) Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Caldwell, Jay E. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 05/10/2021 10:56:28 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/316913 ERSKINE CALDWELL, MARGARET BOURKE-WHITE, AND THE POPULAR FRONT (MOSCOW 1941) by Jay E. Caldwell __________________________ Copyright © Jay E. Caldwell 2014 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2014 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Jay E. Caldwell, titled “Erskine Caldwell, Margaret Bourke-White, and the Popular Front (Moscow 1941),” and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Dissertation Director: Jerrold E. Hogle _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Daniel F. Cooper Alarcon _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Jennifer L. Jenkins _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Robert L. McDonald _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 11 February 2014 Charles W. Scruggs Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of the Conservative Party
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository THE ROLES OF THE CONSERVA TIVE PARTY AND THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT DURING THE 'PHONEY WAR', SEPTEMBER 1939 TO MAY 1940. BY NIGEL ANTHONY PETER JOHNSON A thesis submitted to The University ofBirmingham For the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY Department ofMedieval and Modem History School ofHistorical Studies The University ofBirmingham March 200 1 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis is a detailed study of the interaction between the Conservative party and the National government during the nine months of the 'phoney war'. It concentrates on the potential strength of Chamberlain's position and the Conservative party at the outbreak of war. The Conservative party entered the Second World War full of confidence. The party dominated British politics at a national level. However, Chamberlain's failure to widen the government damaged his credibility as a wartime leader when Labour's leaders rejected his offer of key seats in the war cabinet of the National government.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Simplistic and Sometimes Pernicious Categorisations Which Have So Often Been Applied to the Political Personalities of Th
    a LIberaL witHout a Home The Later Career oF Leslie Hore-belisHa In the simplistic and sometimes pernicious categorisations which have so often been applied to the political personalities of the 1930s – appeasers and anti-appeasers, a majority of dupes and a minority of the far-sighted, the decade’s Guilty Men and its isolated voices in the wilderness – Leslie Hore-Belisha has strong claims to be listed among the virtuous. David Dutton tells the story of Hore-Belisha – a Liberal without a home. 22 Journal of Liberal History 65 Winter 2009–10 a LIberaL witHout a Home The Later Career oF Leslie Hore-belisHa rue, he was a member Belisha ticked most of the right his name. Promoted to be Secre- of the National Gov- boxes. tary of State for War when Nev- ernment for most of its The events of January 1940 ille Chamberlain became Prime existence and a Cabinet represented the abrupt termina- Minister in May 1937, Belisha set minister from Octo- tion of an apparently inexora- about reforming the entrenched Tber 1936 until January 1940. But ble political ascent. Isaac Leslie upper echelons of the army and he was also a vigorous Minister Hore-Belisha was born in 1893, He was also War Office. During nearly three of War, who implemented a suc- the son of Jacob Isaac Belisha, a a vigorous years in this key post, he enhanced cession of much-needed reforms; businessman of Sephardic Jew- his standing with the public but he became disillusioned before ish origins. His father died when minister inevitably trod on many signifi- most of his colleagues with what Leslie was only nine months old cant and sensitive toes.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1 Women in the Political Background
    Notes INTRODUCTION 1 Olive Banks, Faces of Feminism (Oxford, 1981). 2 Martin Pugh has been instrumental in detailing the relationship between the right and feminism, notably in The Tories and the People (Oxford, 1985). 3 Christabel Pankhurst was an approved candidate of the Uoyd George Liberal-Conservative coalition in 1918. Even stranger, perhaps, Mrs Emmeline Pankhurst was a Conservative candidate at the time of her death. It would not be difficult to qualify each woman - at least in her later life - as Conservative. 4 Secret report on policy for women by Douglas?, 24.9.69, CRD 3/38/4, Conservative Party Papers, Bodleian Library, Oxford (henceforth cited as CPP). 1 WOMEN IN THE POLITICAL BACKGROUND 1 Quoted in Brian Harrison, Separate Spheres: The Opposition to Women's Suffrage in Britain (London, 1978), 81. 2 For more on Mary Anne Disraeli see Elizabeth Lee, Wives of the Prime Ministers (London, 1918). 3 The Primrose League will be discussed in more detail in Chapter 2. 4 For Lady Salisbury's correspondence with Disraeli see the Disraeli Papers, 93/2, Bodleian Library, Oxford (henceforth cited as BW). 5 On being asked by another woman if the Primrose League was not vulgar, Lady Salisbury replied: 'Vulgar? Of course it is. That is why we've got on so well.' In Mrs George Cornwallis-West (ed.), The Remi­ niscences of Lady Randolph Churchill (Bath, 1908, repub., 1973), 100. 6 For more on this see Patrick Joyce, 'Popular Toryism in Lancashire 186a-1890' (DPhil, Oxford, 1975). 7 Randolph Churchill, Lord Derby, 'King of Lancashire' (London, 1959), 65-6.
    [Show full text]
  • 288379478.Pdf
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Loughborough University Institutional Repository This item was submitted to Loughborough’s Institutional Repository (https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/) by the author and is made available under the following Creative Commons Licence conditions. For the full text of this licence, please go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ Elective and Experiential Affinities: British and American Foreign Correspondents and the Spanish Civil War David Deacon Abstract This article examines the experiences, attitudes and perceptions of British and American correspondents who reported on the Spanish Civil War directly. The analysis shows that the international news net in the war was more extensive and effectively organised in Republican held territories; and that, taken overall, the political sympathies of the international news corps inclined more towards the Republicans. With some journalists, these reflected pre-existing political viewpoints, but in many cases these sympathies were forged through their experiences in Spain. The article concludes with a discussion of the impact these political positions had on journalists’ interpretations of their professional roles and responsibilities. Keywords: Foreign correspondents; international news; Spanish Civil War; propaganda. Introduction There are increasing concerns that standards of foreign correspondence in British and American news media are not what they were. Academic and journalistic sources have identified declining levels of foreign news coverage, decreasing editorial investment in foreign news desks, and, with the advent of new technologies and presentational formats, an emerging news culture that values immediacy over measured analysis (MacGregor, 1997; Fenton,2005; Parks, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • The British Left Intelligentsia and France Perceptions and Interactions 1930-1944
    ROYAL HOLLOWAY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY The British Left Intelligentsia and France Perceptions and Interactions 1930-1944 Alison Eleanor Appleby September 2013 Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Declaration of Authorship I, Alison Appleby, confirm that this is my own work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged. Signed________________________________ Date__________________________________ 2 ABSTRACT This thesis is concerned with the ways in which the non-communist British left interacted with their French counterparts during the 1930s and the Second World War and described France in their writings and broadcasts. It challenges existing accounts that have described British attitudes to France as characterised by suspicion, ill-feeling or even contempt. It draws on a range of sources, including reportage, private papers, records of left-wing societies and other publications from the period, as well as relevant articles and books. The thesis explores the attitudes of British left-wing intellectuals, trade unionists and politicians and investigates their attempts to find common ground and formulate shared aspirations. The thesis takes a broadly chronological approach, looking first at the pre-1939 period, then at three phases of war and finally at British accounts of the Liberation of France. In the 1930s, British left-wing commentators sought to explain events in France and to work with French socialists and trade unionists in international forums in their search for an appropriate response to both fascism and Soviet communism. Following the defeat of France, networks that included figures from the British left and French socialists living in London in exile developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Doc # Mud and Khaki (Dodo Press) (Paperback)
    LCG0V9SKTVKI « Doc » Mud and Khaki (Dodo Press) (Paperback) Mud and Kh aki (Dodo Press) (Paperback) Filesize: 2.67 MB Reviews Complete guide for publication fanatics. It is full of knowledge and wisdom You will not really feel monotony at at any time of your respective time (that's what catalogues are for about should you question me). (Arely Dare) DISCLAIMER | DMCA AD0UQARFGXCI \\ Doc < Mud and Khaki (Dodo Press) (Paperback) MUD AND KHAKI (DODO PRESS) (PAPERBACK) Dodo Press, United Kingdom, 2009. Paperback. Condition: New. Language: English . Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****. Charles Vernon Oldfield Bartlett CBE (1894-1983) who also wrote under the pseudonym Peter Oldfeld, was an English journalist and politician. As a journalist he worked for the Daily Mail, and was a foreign correspondent for The Times. In 1922 he was appointed director of the London oice of the League of Nations. In 1933 he joined the News Chronicle, and was its diplomatic correspondent for 20 years. In 1942 Vernon Bartlett, Richard Acland, J. B. Priestley and others established the socialist Common Wealth Party. At the 1945 election, he kept his Bridgwater seat, standing as an independent. He joined the Labour Party in 1950 and retired from parliament. He retired from the News Chronicle in 1954 and moved to Singapore, where he was both political commentator for the Straits Times and South East Asia correspondent for the Manchester Guardian. His works include: Mud and Khaki (1917), Calf Love (1929), No Man s Land (1930), Nazi Germany Explained (1933), This is my Life (1937), Tomorrow Always Comes (1943), East of the Iron Curtain (1950), Struggle for Africa (1953), Tuscan Retreat (1964) and A Book About Elba (1965).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Randolph Churchill and the Wavertree By-Election, February 1935
    A MAD HATTER CONTEST FROM BEGINNING TO END': 1 RANDOLPH CHURCHILL AND THE WAVERTREE BY-ELECTION, FEBRUARY 1935 David Button In recent times intense media attention has served to suggest that the outcome of almost every parliamentary by-election carries with it enormous political significance. Professional pundits are ready to assert that each result represents a decisive moment in the fortunes of the government, a turning point in the progress of the official opposition or a revival in the prospects of a third-party force. In reality, however, very few of the several hundred by-elections which have taken place over the last sixty years have possessed anything approaching such decisive importance. It is surely clear that the behaviour of the electorate on occasions other than general elections is often erratic, inconsistent and of little lasting significance. Only occasionally can the evidence of a by-election, in suggesting the withdrawal or return of support to a government, transform the political mood. Yet the fascination remains, not least for governments themselves. By early 1935, for example, the Conservative-dominated National Government, which had secured a massive overall parliamentary majority of 493 seats little over three years earlier, had been reduced to a state of near panic by a depressing series of by-election results. One veteran Conservative observed: 'I never knew our Central Office people so rattled as they were in February. They looked on no seat as safe'.2 With hindsight, it is difficult to believe that this degree of alarm was at all justified. The government defended forty-eight 180 Damd Button seats during the course of the parliament, of which only nine were lost, and there was no extended period during which the swing to the Labour party had been sufficiently strong to imply a Labour victory at the next general election.3 The result of the 1931 election had, after all, been exceptional, with the Conservatives and their supporters winning many seats which had been traditional Labour strongholds.
    [Show full text]