DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 Casgem Monitoring Plan for High and Medium Priority

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014 Casgem Monitoring Plan for High and Medium Priority California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring Program CASGEM Monitoring Plan for High and Medium Priority Groundwater Basins in the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control & Water Conservation District San Luis Obispo County Flood Control & Water Conservation District September 2014 [This page intentionally left blank] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 01 Purpose ........................................................................................................ 01 Background ................................................................................................... 01 Groundwater Basin Coverage & Responsibility ............................................. 01 Approach to Groundwater Monitoring ............................................................ 03 2. Basin Descriptions & Proposed CASGEM Monitoring Plan ............................ 05 State & Regional Setting ............................................................................... 05 History of District’s Groundwater Monitoring in San Luis Obispo County ....... 06 Proposed Groundwater Monitoring Plan for High & Medium Priority Basins .. 07 Groundwater Basin Characteristics & Monitoring Plan Rationale ................... 07 CASGEM Well Network Development ........................................................... 08 Individual Basin Discussions ......................................................................... 09 Cuyama Valley (3-13) ......................................................................... 10 Los Osos Valley (3-8) ......................................................................... 17 Salinas Valley - Paso Robles Area (3-4.06) ........................................ 29 San Luis Obispo Valley (3-9) .............................................................. 39 Santa Maria River Valley (3-12) .......................................................... 49 3. Approach for Filling Data Gaps ........................................................................ 61 Background ................................................................................................... 61 Next Steps .................................................................................................... 63 4. Standard Operating Procedures for Groundwater Monitoring ....................... 65 Monitoring Schedule ..................................................................................... 65 Field Methods ............................................................................................... 65 Reference Point & Land Surface Elevations .................................................. 66 Static Water Levels ....................................................................................... 66 Reporting ...................................................................................................... 67 APPENDIX ............................................................................................................ A-1 Appendix A: CASGEM Well Network Summary ............................................ A-3 Appendix B: Groundwater Technical Procedures of the USGS ....................... A-7 CASGEM Monitoring Plan: San Luis Obispo County Flood Control & Water Conservation District I [This page intentionally left blank] CASGEM Monitoring Plan: San Luis Obispo County Flood Control & Water Conservation District II LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: High & Medium Priority Basins in the District TABLE 2: Recommended Monitoring Well Density TABLE 3: Vertical Data Gap Evaluation for Paso Robles Groundwater Basin TABLE 4: Recent Data Gap Analyses for High & Medium Priority Groundwater Basins within the District TABLE 5: Potential Wells for Filling CASGEM Data Gaps TABLE A-1: CASGEM Well Network Summary LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: Groundwater Basin Delineations and Monitoring Entity Boundary in San Luis Obispo County Flood Control & Water Conservation District FIGURE 2: California’s Hydrologic Regions FIGURE 3: Groundwater Basins of the Central Coast Hydrologic Region FIGURE 4: Monitoring Program for the Cuyama Valley Groundwater Basin FIGURE 5: Cuyama Valley Area Aerial Geology and Location of Geologic Sections FIGURE 6: Stratigraphic Diagram of the Cuyama Valley Area FIGURE 7: Monitoring Program for the Los Osos Groundwater Basin FIGURE 8: Conceptual Model of the Los Osos Groundwater Basin FIGURE 9: North-South Cross-Section of the Basin FIGURE 10: West-East Cross-Section of the Basin FIGURE 11: Monitoring Program for the Salinas Valley – Paso Robles Area Groundwater Basin FIGURE 12: Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Cross-Section A-A’ FIGURE 13: Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Cross-Section B-B’ FIGURE 14: Monitoring Program for the San Luis Obispo Groundwater Basin FIGURE 15: Aerial Geology and Location of Geologic Sections FIGURE 16: Cross-Section F1-F2 FIGURE 17: Cross-Section F3-F4 FIGURE 18: Monitoring Program for the Santa Maria River Valley Groundwater Basin FIGURE 19: Santa Maria Valley Groundwater Basin Geology and Location of Geologic Sections FIGURE 20: Geologic Cross-Section D-D’ FIGURE 21: Geologic Cross-Section J-J’ CASGEM Monitoring Plan: San Luis Obispo County Flood Control & Water Conservation District III [This page intentionally left blank] CASGEM Monitoring Plan: San Luis Obispo County Flood Control & Water Conservation District IV LIST OF ACRNONYMS & ABREVIATIONS CASGEM California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring County San Luis Obispo County District San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District DWR California Department of Water Resources Program District Groundwater Level Measuring Program SMVMA Santa Maria Valley Management Area USGS United States Geological Survey CASGEM Monitoring Plan: San Luis Obispo County Flood Control & Water Conservation District V [This page intentionally left blank] CASGEM Monitoring Plan: San Luis Obispo County Flood Control & Water Conservation District VI 1. Introduction Purpose The purpose of this plan is to comply with the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring (CASGEM) Program by creating a plan to monitor groundwater elevations of California’s alluvial groundwater basins and sub-basins identified in DWR Bulletin 118 that are located within the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) boundaries. As part of the CASGEM Program, DWR was required to prioritize California groundwater basins. This monitoring plan will focus on the High and Medium priority groundwater basins, with the intent that a separate monitoring plan (or plans) will be developed for Low and Very-Low priority groundwater basins within the District. Background DWR developed the CASGEM Program in response to Part 2.11 (Groundwater Monitoring), Division 6 of the California Water Code, which was added in 2009 by the passage of Senate Bill 6, 7th Extraordinary Session. The law directs that groundwater elevations in all groundwater basins and sub basins in California be regularly and systematically monitored, preferably by local entities, with the goal of demonstrating seasonal and long-term trends in groundwater elevations. The intent of the CASGEM program is to rely and build on the many established long-term groundwater monitoring and management programs, and for the role of DWR to be data coordination, data maintenance, and data dissemination in a readily and widely available public database. DWR is also mandated to continue its current statewide groundwater level monitoring and data dissemination efforts, as funding allows. Through the CASGEM program, local monitoring parties with appropriate authority may notify DWR of their intent to be a Monitoring Entity. On December 30, 2010, under authority of the District, the County of San Luis Obispo applied to DWR to become the countywide Monitoring Entity which would designate wells as appropriate for monitoring and reporting groundwater elevations for purposes of the CASGEM program. Following confirmation of DWR’s acceptance of the District as the Monitoring Entity, the District proceeded to identify the wells to be included in the monitoring program network and to prepare this CASGEM Monitoring Plan as required by DWR. Groundwater Basin Coverage & Responsibility DWR Bulletin 118 identifies twenty two (22) groundwater basins located fully or partially within San Luis Obispo County, the District’s jurisdictional boundary is one and the same CASGEM Monitoring Plan: San Luis Obispo County Flood Control & Water Conservation District 1 with San Luis Obispo County’s boundary (see Figure 1 for basin and jurisdictional boundaries, and Section 2 for the list of groundwater basins in the county). FIGURE 1: Groundwater Basin Delineations and Monitoring Entity Boundary in San Luis Obispo County Flood Control & Water Conservation District The District is the only entity that has submitted their intent to serve as a Monitoring Entity for two (2) of the five (5) High and Medium priority groundwater basins in the District. The remaining three (3) basins will require Monitoring Plans from multiple Monitoring Entities in order to address the entire basin. Basins that require multiple Monitoring Entities for basin-wide coverage are as follows: CASGEM Monitoring Plan: San Luis Obispo County Flood Control & Water Conservation District 2 The Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin: This basin spans San Luis Obispo and Monterey counties. This Plan will
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Late Cenozoic Tectonics of the Central and Southern Coast Ranges of California
    OVERVIEW Late Cenozoic tectonics of the central and southern Coast Ranges of California Benjamin M. Page* Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 George A. Thompson† Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2215 Robert G. Coleman Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 ABSTRACT within the Coast Ranges is ascribed in large Taliaferro (e.g., 1943). A prodigious amount of part to the well-established change in plate mo- geologic mapping by T. W. Dibblee, Jr., pre- The central and southern Coast Ranges tions at about 3.5 Ma. sented the areal geology in a form that made gen- of California coincide with the broad Pa- eral interpretations possible. E. H. Bailey, W. P. cific–North American plate boundary. The INTRODUCTION Irwin, D. L. Jones, M. C. Blake, and R. J. ranges formed during the transform regime, McLaughlin of the U.S. Geological Survey and but show little direct mechanical relation to The California Coast Ranges province encom- W. R. Dickinson are among many who have con- strike-slip faulting. After late Miocene defor- passes a system of elongate mountains and inter- tributed enormously to the present understanding mation, two recent generations of range build- vening valleys collectively extending southeast- of the Coast Ranges. Representative references ing occurred: (1) folding and thrusting, begin- ward from the latitude of Cape Mendocino (or by these and many other individuals were cited in ning ca. 3.5 Ma and increasing at 0.4 Ma, and beyond) to the Transverse Ranges. This paper Page (1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Northwestern Caliente Range, San Luis Obispo County, California
    USGS L BRARY RESTON 1111 111 1 11 11 II I I II 1 1 111 II 11 3 1818 0001k616 3 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic map of the northwestern Caliente Range, San Luis Obispo County, California by J. Alan Bartowl Open-File Report 88-691 This map is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by USGS 'Menlo Park, CA 1988 it nedelitil Sow( diSti) DISCUSSION INTRODUCTION The map area lies in the southern Coast Ranges of California, north of the Transverse Ranges and west of the southern San Joaquin Valley. This region is part of the Salinia-Tujunga composite terrane that is bounded on the northeast by the San Andreas fault (fig. 1) and on the southwest by the Nacimiento fault zone (Vedder and others, 1983). The Chimineas fault of this map is inferred to be the boundary between the Salinia and the Tujunga terranes (Ross, 1972; Vedder and others, 1983). Geologic mapping in the region of the California Coast Ranges that includes the area of this map has been largely the work of T.W. Dibblee, Jr. Compilations of geologic mapping at a scale of 1:125,000 (Dibblee, 1962, 1973a) provide the regional setting for this map, the northeast border of which lies about 6 to 7 km southwest of the San Andreas fault. Ross (1972) mapped the crystalline basement rocks in the vicinity of Barrett Creek, along the northeast side of the Chimineas fault ("Barrett Ridge" of Ross, 1972).
    [Show full text]
  • Creek Stewardship Guide for San Luis Obispo County Was Adapted from the Sotoyome Resource Conservation District’S Stewardship Guide for the Russian River
    Creek Stewardship Guide San Luis Obispo County 65 South Main Street Suite 107 Templeton, CA 93465 805.434.0396 ext. 5 www.US-LTRCD.org Acknowledgements The Creek Stewardship Guide for San Luis Obispo County was adapted from the Sotoyome Resource Conservation District’s Stewardship Guide for the Russian River. Text & Technical Review Sotoyome Resource Conservation District, Principal Contributor Melissa Sparks, Principal Contributor National Resource Conservation District, Contributor City of Paso Robles, Contributor Terra Verde Environmental Consulting, Reviewer/Editor Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District, Reviewer/Editor Monterey County Resource Conservation District, Reviewer/Editor San Luis Obispo County Public Works Department, Reviewer/Editor Atascadero Mutual Water Company, Reviewer Photographs Carolyn Berg Terra Verde Environmental Consulting US-LT RCD Design, Editing & Layout Scott Ender Supporting partner: December 2012 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 2 RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICTS IN SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 3 WATERSHEDS OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 3 Climate 4 Unique & Diverse Watersheds & Sub-Watersheds of San Luis Obispo County 7 Agriculture in San Luis Obispo County Watersheds 8 WHAT YOU CAN DO TO HELP SAN LUIS OBISPO’S CREEKS 9 Prevent & Control Soil Erosion 11 Properly Maintain Unsurfaced Roads and Driveways 13 Restore Native Riparian Vegetation 14 Remove Exotic Species 14 Enhance Instream Habitat 15 Avoid Creating Fish Passage Barriers 15 Conserve Water 16 Control Stormwater Runoff 16 Maintain Septic Systems
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Open Space Element Appendices
    County of San Luis Obispo General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element Appendices May 2010 San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building ® County of San Luis Obispo General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element Appendices Adopted by the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors May 11, 2010 - Resolution 2010-151 San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building ® ® TOC TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix 1. Air Quality Resources Introduction ......................................................................... A1.1 Local Setting ....................................................................... A1.1 Regulatory Framework ....................................................... A1.9 Climate Change ................................................................ A1.20 References ....................................................................... A1.30 Appendix 2. Community-Wide and County Government Operations 2006 Baseline Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Executive Summary ............................................................ A2.1 Community-Wide GHG Inventory Results ........................... A2.2 County government operations GHG Inventory Results ..... A2.2 Data limitations ................................................................... A2.3 Forecast and Next Steps .................................................... A2.4 1. Introduction ................................................................... A2.6 2. Community and County Government Operations Inventory Methodology ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Collections
    A. andersonii A. Gray SANTA CRUZ MANZANITA San Mateo Along Skyline Blvd. between Gulch Road and la Honda Rd. (A. regismontana?) Santa Cruz Along Empire Grade, about 2 miles north of its intersection with Alba Grade. Lat. N. 37° 07', Long. 122° 10' W. Altitude about 2550 feet. Santa Cruz Aong grade (summit) 0.8 mi nw Alba Road junction (2600 ft elev. above and nw of Ben Lomond (town)) - Empire Grade Santa Cruz Near Summit of Opal Creek Rd., Big Basin Redwood State Park. Santa Cruz Near intersection of Empire Grade and Alba Grade. ben Lomond Mountain. Santa Cruz Along China Grade, 0.2 miles NW of its intersection with the Big Basin-Saratoga Summit Rd. Santa Cruz Nisene Marks State Park, Aptos Creek watershed; under PG&E high-voltage transmission line on eastern rim of the creek canyon Santa Cruz Along Redwood Drive 1.5 miles up (north of) from Monte Toyon Santa Cruz Miller's Ranch, summit between Gilroy and Watsonville. Santa Cruz At junction of Alba Road and Empire Road Ben Lomond Ridge summit Santa Cruz Sandy ridges near Bonny Doon - Santa Cruz Mountains Santa Cruz 3 miles NW of Santa Cruz, on upper UC Santa Cruz campus, Marshall Fields Santa Cruz Mt. Madonna Road along summit of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Between Lands End and Manzanitas School. Lat. N. 37° 02', Long. 121° 45' W; elev. 2000 feet Monterey Moro Road, Prunedale (A. pajaroensis?) A. auriculata Eastw. MT. DIABLO MANZANITA Contra Costa Between two major cuts of Cowell Cement Company (w face of ridge) - Mount Diablo, Lime Ridge Contra Costa Immediately south of Nortonville; 37°57'N, 121°53'W Contra Costa Top Pine Canyon Ridge (s-facing slope between the two forks) - Mount Diablo, Emmons Canyon (off Stone Valley) Contra Costa Near fire trail which runs s from large spur (on meridian) heading into Sycamore Canyon - Mount Diablo, Inner Black Hills Contra Costa Off Summit Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • October 3, 2018
    Cuyama Valley Groundwater Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model Draft Prepared by: October 2018 Table of Contents Chapter 2 Basin Setting .......................................................................................................2-2 Acronyms 2-3 2.1 Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model ..........................................................................2-4 2.1.1 Useful Terminology ................................................................................................2-4 2.1.2 Regional Geologic and Structural Setting ..............................................................2-5 2.1.3 Geologic History ....................................................................................................2-5 2.1.4 Geologic Formations/Stratigraphy .........................................................................2-8 2.1.5 Faults and Structural Features ............................................................................. 2-17 2.1.6 Basin Boundaries ................................................................................................ 2-26 2.1.7 Principal Aquifers and Aquitards .......................................................................... 2-26 2.1.8 Natural Water Quality Characterization ................................................................ 2-32 2.1.9 Topography, Surface Water and Recharge .......................................................... 2-36 2.1.10 Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model Data Gaps .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Abies Bracteata Revised 2011 1 Abies Bracteata (D. Don) Poit
    Lead Forest: Los Padres National Forest Forest Service Endemic: No Abies bracteata (D. Don) Poit. (bristlecone fir) Known Potential Synonym: Abies venusta (Douglas ex Hook.) K. Koch; Pinus bracteata D. Don; Pinus venusta Douglas ex Hook (Tropicos 2011). Table 1. Legal or Protection Status (CNDDB 2011, CNPS 2011, and Other Sources). Federal Listing Status; State Heritage Rank California Rare Other Lists Listing Status Plant Rank None; None G2/S2.3 1B.3 USFS Sensitive Plant description: Abies bracteata (Pinaceae) (Fig. 1) is a perennial monoecious plant with trunks longer than 55 m and less than 1.3 m wide. The branches are more-or-less drooping, and the bark is thin. The twigs are glabrous, and the buds are 1-2.5 cm long, sharp-pointed, and non- resinous. The leaves are less than 6 cm long, are dark green, faintly grooved on their upper surfaces, and have tips that are sharply spiny. Seed cones are less than 9 cm long with stalks that are under15 mm long. The cones have bracts that are spreading, exserted, and that are 1.5–4.5 cm long with a slender spine at the apex. Taxonomy: Abies bracteata is a fir species and a member of the pine family (Pinaceae). Out of the fir species growing in North America (Griffin and Critchfield 1976), Abies bracteata has the smallest range and is the least abundant. Identification: Many features of A. bracteata can be used to distinguish this species from other conifers, including the sharp-tipped needles, thin bark, club-shaped crown, non-resinous buds, and exserted spine tipped bracts (Gymnosperms Database 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 Los Padres National R5-MB-078 Forest Strategy September 2005
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Management Plan Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Part 2 Los Padres National R5-MB-078 Forest Strategy September 2005 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, Write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Land Management Plan Part 2 Los Padres National Forest Strategy R5-MB-078 September 2005 Table of Contents Tables ....................................................................................................................................................v Document Format Protocols................................................................................................................ vi LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN STRATEGY..................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to Establish the “Paso Robles
    PETITION TO ESTABLISH THE “PASO ROBLES ESTRELLA DISTRICT” AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREA Submitted to Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau Regulations and Rulings Division 1310 G Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20220 (202) 927-5000 by the PASO ROBLES AVA COMMITTEE March 23, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 A. The Paso Robles American Viticultural Area ................................................... 2 1. A Brief History of the Paso Robles Region ........................................................... 4 2. A Brief History of the Wine Grape Industry in Paso Robles ................................. 5 3. Geographical and Viticultural Diversity of the Paso Robles AVA by Professor Deborah Elliott-Fisk .............................................................................................. 8 B. Framework for New Viticultural Areas within the Paso Robles AVA ......... 18 II. Proposed Paso Robles Estrella District Viticultural Area ............................. 20 A. Name Identification and Boundary Support ................................................... 21 1. History of Paso Robles Estrella District ............................................................... 21 2. Viticultural History .............................................................................................. 24 3. Name and Boundary Evidence ............................................................................. 25 4. Name of Viticultural
    [Show full text]
  • ORWA26 750UTM: Oregon/Washington 750 Meter
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Open File Report 00-447 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY David W. Valentine, Jill N. Densmore, Devin L. Galloway, and Falk Amelung. Use of InSAR to Identify Land-Surface Displacements Caused by Aquifer-System Compaction in the Paso Robles Area, San Luis Obispo County, California, March to August 1997 was provided for the wells, the exact well locations are not known. Therefore, all wells in a section were assigned an approximate position that corresponds with the center of the section, and thus well locations may be off by as much as 0.7 mile. FOCUS AREA Paso Robles 120°30' Shandon 120°00' Because the data are sparse, a triangular-irregular mesh was used to construct the contour maps of spring 1997 water-surface 121°00' 120°30' (Figures 2 120°00' NE Signature Signature FOCUS AREA elevations (Figure 2) and the seasonal ground-water level change (Figure 4). The seasonal ground-water level change was Cholame Hills and 4) Red Hills Kettleman Hills Paso Robles calculated by subtracting fall 1997 water levels from spring 1997 water levels. PASO AREA OF Signature Signature Santa LuciaROBLES Rang InSAR IMAGE NW Signature CREEK 101 PASO (Figure 3) 1 Paso Robles Results Paso 46 SUBUNIT OF San Andre GROUN ROBLES S Signature SALINAS PIEDRAS Robles The interferogram for March 28-August 15, 1997, shows four phase signatures in two separate locations within the area of BLANCAS primary focus for this study (Figure 4). Three of these signatures are located northeast of Paso Robles and the other is northeast POINT BASIND of Atascadero (Figure 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of the Southern Coast Ranges Near the San Andreas Fault from Cholame to Maricopa, California
    Stratigraphy of the Southern Coast Ranges near the San Andreas Fault from Cholame to Maricopa, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 764 Stratigraphy of the Southern Coast Ranges near the San Andreas Fault from Gholame to Maricopa, California By T. W. DIBBLEE, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 764 A discussion of the regional stratigraphy of the McLure Valley area, Temblor Range, Carrizo Plain, Cuyama Valley, Caliente Range, La Panza Range, and Sierra Madre Mountains UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600327 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Price: Paper cover-80 cents, domestic postpaid; 55 cents, GPO Bookstore. Stock No. 2401-00300 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract _ _ __________________________ 1 Middle Tertiary sedimentary sequence Continued Introduction _____________________________________ 1 Vaqueros and Temblor Formations Continued Scope and purpose ___________________________ 1 Temblor Formation Continued Problems of stratigraphic terminology _________ 3 Buttonbed Sandstone Member ______ 23 Chronology used _____________________________ 3 Monterey Shale ____________________ 24 Tectonic areas ____________________________ 5 Review of nomenclature _____ _ 24 Crystalline plutonic and metamorphic rocks ________ 5 Stratigraphic units southwest of the San Eugeosynclinal sedimentary
    [Show full text]
  • 12000000 Pure Organic & Non-GMO
    Carmody- Pure Organic & Non-GMO 80.0± ACRES $12,000,000 McKnight West Paso Robles, CA ($150,000 per acre) ESTATE VINEYARD www.pearsonrealty.com Exclusively Presented by: CA DRE# 00020875 All information contained herein is deemed reliable but not guaranteed by seller nor broker and should be independently verified by potential buyers. We assume no liability for errors or omissions. Carmody-McKnight Pure Organic & Non-GMO 80.0± ACRES ESTATE VINEYARD West Paso Robles, CA Aerial Map LOcatION: The subject property is located approximately 13.5± miles inland from the Central Coast of California, just 11± miles west of the city of Paso Robles which is located on Highway 101 and Highway 46. 101 San Miguel Lake Nacimiento San Marcos Rd Paso Robles Municipal Airport Chimney Rock Rd 101 Nacimiento Adelaida Rd Lake Dr 46 Paso Robles 1 46 101 Cambria Templeton 46 1 46 Green Valley Rd 2 All information contained herein is deemed reliable but not guaranteed by seller nor broker and should be independently verified by potential buyers. We assume no liability for errors or omissions. Carmody-McKnight Pure Organic & Non-GMO 80.0± ACRES ESTATE VINEYARD West Paso Robles, CA Property Highlights This beautiful and unique 80± acre USDA compliant organic vineyard, farmed property is situated within the desirable sustainably without any agri-chemicals -- from West Paso Robles “Adelaida” AVA and petro-fertilizers to fungicides; fertilizers of any includes 50± acres of mature vineyard 1 planted on its picturesque hillside with kind have historically never been required or applied. spectacular views of vineyards and oak studded mountains.
    [Show full text]