28.1.2010 Planning

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

28.1.2010 Planning 69 28.1.2010 Planning PLANNING COMMITTEE Minutes of the proceedings at a meeting of the Committee held in the District Council Chamber at South Lakeland House, Kendal, on 28 January 2010, at 10.00 a.m. Present Councillors Paul Little (Chairman) Ian McPherson (Vice-Chairman) Alan Baverstock Jane Carson Brian Cooper Joss Curwen Colin Davies Sheila Eccles Sylvia Emmott Brenda Gray Frank Hodson Janette Jenkinson Kevin Lancaster David Williams Mary Wilson Officers Fiona Clark Planning Officer Kate Lawson Area Team Leader (West) (part) Phil Greenup Environmental Health Team Leader (part) Barry Jackson Planning Officer (part) Janine Jenkinson Assistant Democratic Services Officer Matthew Neal Solicitor to the Council (part) Andy Roe Development Control Manager P/100 MINUTES RESOLVED – That the Chairman be authorised to sign, as a correct record, the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 7 January 2010. P/101 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST RESOLVED – That it be noted that the following declarations of interest were made:- (1) Councillor Sheila Eccles – Minute P/106 (Planning Application No.SL/2009/1006); and (2) Councillor Kevin Lancaster – Minute P/104 (Planning Application No.SL/2009/0838). P/102 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 – EXCLUDED ITEMS RESOLVED – That it be noted that there were no items in Part II of the Agenda. P/103 PLANNING APPLICATIONS The Development Control Manager submitted a Schedule of Planning Applications and his recommendations thereon. 70 28.1.2010 Planning RESOLVED – That (1) the applications be determined as indicated below (the numbers denote the Schedule numbers of the application); (2) except where stated below, the applications be subject to the relevant conditions and advice notes, as outlined in the Schedule; and (3) except where stated below, the reasons for refusal be those as outlined in the Schedule. P/104 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Planning Applications RESOLVED – That the following applications, for which representations have been received from members of the public, in accordance with Minute 1810 (1996/97), be determined in the following manner:- Note – Councillor Kevin Lancaster declared a personal interest in the following item of business, by virtue of being a former pupil of Queen Elizabeth School. 1.SL/2009/0838 KIRKBY LONSDALE: Biggins Road, Kirkby Lonsdale. Thirty four dwellings with associated vehicular and pedestrian access. (Mr M Nicholson (Russell Armer Ltd) Mr Nick Cotton spoke on behalf of the residents of Biggins Road. He raised objections to the application relating to the loss of a playing field, highway safety and overdevelopment of the site. A full copy of his speech is available on the Democratic Services file. Mr Jim Bowers, the owner of Cedar School, addressed the Committee. He advised Members that the annual rent for the playing field had been raised significantly. As a result the school had lost the use of a valuable asset and alternative provision had been located elsewhere. He asserted that the permanent loss of the field would adversely affect the general recreational provision and open space within the town. Mr Ty Power, Chairman of Queen Elizabeth School, Kirkby Lonsdale, spoke in objection to the application. A copy of Mr Power’s full submission is available on file. Mr Brian Barden, the applicant’s agent, responded to the points raised. With regard to safety concerns, he reassured the Committee that the Traffic Report assessment that had been undertaken, had been based on first hand data recorded at similar sites to that of the proposal. It was asserted that many of the future resident’s children would be able to walk to the nearby schools, thus reducing the level of peak time traffic compared with sites elsewhere. The Assessment had concluded that the level of vehicular 71 28.1.2010 Planning movement would be acceptable to the site. With regards to safety concerns raised, Mr Barden was of the opinion that secondary school children would be suitably able to deal with the level of traffic that would be generated by the proposal. The Planning Officer outlined the details of the scheme and highlighted that the scale of the development would be in keeping with the wider Kirkby Lonsdale townscape, and the proposal would not adversely affect the privacy or amenity of neighbouring residents. The Corporate Director (Communities) be authorised to GRANT Planning Permission subject to referral to the Department of Communities and Local Government, in respect of the loss of the playing field; the applicant entering into a S106 Agreement to secure affordable housing/local occupancy as part of the development; the maintenance of open space and the provision of off-site play equipment and appropriate conditions as detailed in the Schedule. The Planning Officer be requested to write to Cumbria County Council Highways to request consideration be given to traffic calming/safety measures along Kendal Road in the vicinity of junction with Biggins Road. 5.SL/2009/1020 NETHER STAVELEY: Land at Ratherheath, adjacent A591. Development of business park (including B1, B2 and B8 uses) including parking, landscaping, ancillary modal transfer facility (to include park and ride) and access by new roundabout. (The Ratherheath Partnership – Stagecoach, W McClure Limited, Stonecraft Design and Peill & Co) Mr David Aspinwall, Mr John Elleray and Sue Walley spoke in objection to the application. Full copies of their submissions are available on the Democratic Services file. Mr Kim Tullet, the applicant’s agent responded to the points raised. Mr Tullet stated that the proposed land was of a poor quality and unsuitable for agricultural purposes, but could suitably be utilised to meet the needs of two local businesses and provide employment land. He asserted that the development would be situated in a suitable location, well connected to the established transport network. The Committee was updated on consultation responses received. Staveley and Ings Parish Council had objected to the application on the grounds that the development would exert a detrimental impact on the landscape, generate an unacceptable level of additional traffic and would raise issues relating to flooding and light pollution. The Planning Officer reported receipt of 19 additional letters of objection, in total the authority had received 94 letters of 72 28.1.2010 Planning opposition to the application. Members’ were unanimous in their decision to refuse the application. REFUSE 16.SL/2009/1061 HUTTON ROOF: Sealford Farm, Newbiggin. Siting of two holiday lodges/chalets. (Mrs Karen Kemp) Mrs Whelan, spoke in objection to the application. She raised concerns regarding the intrusive impact of the proposal and the loss of privacy to the neighbouring properties. Mr Rowbottom, addressed the Committee on behalf of Miss Stella Whelan, a neighbouring resident. Mr Rowbottom raised objections on the grounds that the application would have a detrimental impact on the surrounding landscape, residential amenity, capacity of the road system and unsuitable vehicular access and car parking provision. Members were updated on consultation responses received. Cumbria Highways was satisfied that the traffic generated by the development would be appropriate and acceptable to the location. The National Grid had raised objections to the proposal on the grounds that the development would be constructed over National Grid pipelines. In addition, four letters of objection were reported to the Committee. The main issues raised related to the loss of privacy for nearby residents, noise disturbance, loss of light, inadequate vehicular access and stated that the proposal would exert a harmful impact on wildlife and be out of character with the surrounding landscape. REFUSE 17.SL/2009/1070 HOLME: 4 Turners Close, Holme. Extensions and alterations. (Mr Mark Hayton) Angela Willan, the owner of 5 Turners Close, spoke in objection to the application. A full copy of her speech is available on the Democratic Services file. Mrs Hayton, the applicant’s wife, spoke in response. She advised the Committee that they had intended to sell their property, but efforts had been unsuccessful. As an alternative they hoped to build an extension to suitably accommodate their family. Amendments to the original plans had been made to address the concerns raised by neighbouring residents. She had been of the opinion that the alterations made were consistent with the issues raised, and she had only recently been made aware that objections remained. The Planning Officer reported that the proposals as originally 73 28.1.2010 Planning submitted had been amended and it was considered that these changes would resolve the difficulties initially identified. It subsequently became apparent, however, that the effect of the two-storey rear extension on the living conditions currently enjoyed by the occupants of no.5 would be greater than originally thought. Members felt that a site visit would be beneficial in order to assess the impact of the proposed development. DEFER for site visit. P/105 COMPLEX PLANNING APPLICATIONS RESOLVED – That the following application be determined in the manner set out:- 2.SL/2009/0856 KIRKBY IRELETH: The Malt Kiln, Grizebeck, Kirkby in Furness. Conversion of redundant workshop into two live/work units including installation of sewage treatment plant. (M K Supplies) Consideration of the application had been deferred from the last Committee meeting to enable further information to be obtained regarding the drainage aspects of the development. The Environmental Health Team Leader gave technical advice relating to the drainage arrangement of the sewage treatment plant. He reassured Members that the application adequately complied with the required standards and confirmed that he was satisfied with the scheme, subject to appropriate conditions being attached to any permission granted. Members raised concerns in relation to road safety and the intensity of the scheme. It was felt that the forecourt area was insufficient to permit parking provision without encroaching onto the public footway. REFUSE – due to inadequate car parking/ turning space for level of development proposed.
Recommended publications
  • 2.0 Lower Allithwaite Neighbourhood Development Plan Vision and Objectives
    Lower Allithwaite Neighbourhood Development Plan to 2025 –Discussion Draft April 2016 2 Acknowledgements The Lower Allithwaite Neighbourhood Development Plan has been prepared by group of volunteers, with support from South Lakeland District Council, and Kirkwells Town Planning Consultants. The Parish Council would like to thank the following for their hard work and commitment in the preparation of this Plan: INSERT NAMES? Lower Allithwaite Neighbourhood Development Plan to 2025 –Discussion Draft April 2016 3 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and Background ................................................................................. 5 2.0 Lower Allithwaite Neighbourhood Development Plan Vision and Objectives ........... 7 3.0 History of Lower Allithwaite Parish ......................................................................... 9 4.0 Lower Allithwaite Parish Today ............................................................................ 11 5.0 Planning Policy Context ........................................................................................ 13 6.0 Neighbourhood Plan Policies ................................................................................ 15 6.1 Built Environment and Heritage Assets ........................................................................ 15 6.2 Green Infrastructure and Landscape Character ............................................................. 18 6.3 Transport including Pedestrian Safety and Countryside Access ..................................... 23 6.4 Housing......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Index to Gallery Geograph
    INDEX TO GALLERY GEOGRAPH IMAGES These images are taken from the Geograph website under the Creative Commons Licence. They have all been incorporated into the appropriate township entry in the Images of (this township) entry on the Right-hand side. [1343 images as at 1st March 2019] IMAGES FROM HISTORIC PUBLICATIONS From W G Collingwood, The Lake Counties 1932; paintings by A Reginald Smith, Titles 01 Windermere above Skelwith 03 The Langdales from Loughrigg 02 Grasmere Church Bridge Tarn 04 Snow-capped Wetherlam 05 Winter, near Skelwith Bridge 06 Showery Weather, Coniston 07 In the Duddon Valley 08 The Honister Pass 09 Buttermere 10 Crummock-water 11 Derwentwater 12 Borrowdale 13 Old Cottage, Stonethwaite 14 Thirlmere, 15 Ullswater, 16 Mardale (Evening), Engravings Thomas Pennant Alston Moor 1801 Appleby Castle Naworth castle Pendragon castle Margaret Countess of Kirkby Lonsdale bridge Lanercost Priory Cumberland Anne Clifford's Column Images from Hutchinson's History of Cumberland 1794 Vol 1 Title page Lanercost Priory Lanercost Priory Bewcastle Cross Walton House, Walton Naworth Castle Warwick Hall Wetheral Cells Wetheral Priory Wetheral Church Giant's Cave Brougham Giant's Cave Interior Brougham Hall Penrith Castle Blencow Hall, Greystoke Dacre Castle Millom Castle Vol 2 Carlisle Castle Whitehaven Whitehaven St Nicholas Whitehaven St James Whitehaven Castle Cockermouth Bridge Keswick Pocklington's Island Castlerigg Stone Circle Grange in Borrowdale Bowder Stone Bassenthwaite lake Roman Altars, Maryport Aqua-tints and engravings from
    [Show full text]
  • SLLC Highways and Transportation Working Group 15 February 2013
    SLLC Highways and Transportation Working Group 15 February 2013 South Lakeland Local Committee Devolved Capital Programme 2013/14 Appendix 8 Small Highway Improvement Schemes Candidate List RECOMMENDED SCHEMES SHADED GREY Parish Council scheme comments (benefits; land issues and other CCC Electoral Road No. Priority Parish Road Name Settlement Parish Request/Scheme Description Detailed Location potential delivery difficulties; potential Cumbria Highways comments Cost Type Division (if known) Score developer implications; potential funding partners) Improving pedestrian (possibly cycling) and limited mobility accessibility - SLDC LDF. Also, a number of aims of the Rights of Way Improvement Plan (limited mobility, short walks, transport links, and so on). Together with the removal of the kissing gates (above) would then Extend footpath 526003 southwards create a route suitable for all those Preliminary Design - Requires further alongside railway (a track already Grange Grange-over-Sands Footpath Kents Bank Promenade walk extension with limited mobility between Grange- assessment to confirm details and 3000 60 Prep exists for most of the way - but over-Sands and Kents Bank stations. deliverability inaccessible) to Kents Bank Station This would enable those with limited mobility, and others to make flat, level journeys betwen the settlements and facilities - as well as enabling one way journeys with returns by rail. Possibly open to cyclists as well, although one stretch is narrow and would possibly entail pushing (and the right to cycle issue
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Kenneth Howson Grange Architectural Services Fellgate Cartmel Road GRANGE OVER SANDS LA11 7QA South Lakeland District Council
    Mr Kenneth Howson South Lakeland District Council Grange Architectural Services South Lakeland House Fellgate Lowther Street Cartmel Road Kendal GRANGE OVER SANDS Cumbria LA9 4DL LA11 7QA Tel: 01539 733333 www.southlakeland.gov.uk Our Ref: SL/2016/1139 Your Ref: Date: 16 December 2016 Dear Sir LOCATION: Badgers Wood, Woodlands Drive, Allithwaite, GRANGE OVER SANDS PROPOSAL: Alteration to roof configuration to create accommodation in roof space and formation of terrace over existing conservatory. Thank you for your FULL PLANNING application. It was received on 15 December 2016. Please note that we may have changed the description of the proposal. If you do not agree with the description please contact me. If you have provided an email address we will normally contact you by email. The application appears to be in order. However, if we find that we need further information or an additional fee we will let you know as soon as we can. Your application number is SL/2016/1139 (Please use this whenever you contact us). The Planning Officer dealing with your application is Chris Harrison. We will do our best to issue a decision within 8 weeks. If we cannot do so, we will contact you. If we do not issue a decision within 8 weeks you may lodge an appeal with: The Planning Inspectorate Temple Quay House 2 The Square Temple Quay Bristol, BS1 6PN Alternatively you may contact them at: www.planning-inspectorate.gov.uk PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU SHOULD CHECK WITH THE BUILDING CONTROL SECTION TO CONFIRM WHETHER OR NOT THE WORKS YOU PROPOSE REQUIRE CONSENT UNDER BUILDING REGULATIONS.
    [Show full text]
  • The National and Community Averages Being 228 And
    19 . 5 . 75 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 128/231 COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 28 April 1975 concerning the Community list of less-favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive No 75/268/EEC (United Kingdom ) (75/276/EEC ) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, 75% of the national average (£ 1 072 and £ 1 436 respectively); Having regard to the Treaty establishing the Euro­ pean Economic Community ; Whereas the index relating to the low population density referred to in Article 3 ( 4) ( c ) of Directive Having regard to Council Directive No 75/268/ No 75/268/EEC does not exceed 36 inhabitants per EEC (*) of 28 April 1975 on mountain and hill square kilometre ( the national and Community farming and farming in certain less-favoured areas , averages being 228 and 168 inhabitants per square and in particular Article 2 ( 2 ) thereof ; kilometre respectively ; whereas the minimum propor­ tion of the working population engaged in agriculture as a percentage of the total working population is Having regard to the proposal from the Commission ; 19% ( the national and Community averages being 3-08 and 9-58 % respectively); Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament ; "Whereas the nature and level of the abovementioned indices, utilized by the Government of the United Having regard to the Opinion of the Economic and Kingdom to define the areas notified to the Commis­ Social Committee ( 2 ); sion , corresponds to the characteristics of less favoured farming areas referred to in Article 3 (4) of Whereas the United
    [Show full text]
  • Open Zone Map in a New
    Crosby Garrett Kirkby Stephen Orion Smardale Grasmere Raisbeck Nateby Sadgill Ambleside Tebay Kelleth Kentmere Ravenstonedale Skelwith Bridge Troutbeck Outhgill Windermere Selside Zone 1 M6 Hawkshead Aisgill Grayrigg Bowness-on-Windermere Bowston Lowgill Monday/Tuesday Near Sawrey Burneside Mitchelland Crook Firbank 2 Kendal Lunds Killington Sedburgh Garsdale Head Zone 2 Lake Crosthwaite Bowland Oxenholme Garsdale Brigsteer Wednesday Bridge Killington Broughton-in-Furness 1 Rusland Old Hutton Cartmel Fell Lakeside Dent Cowgill Lowick Newby Bridge Whitbarrow National Levens M6 Middleton Stone House Nature Reserve Foxfield Bouth Zone 3 A595 Backbarrow A5092 The Green Deepdale Crooklands Heversham Penny Bridge A590 High Newton A590 Mansergh Barbon Wednesday/Thursday Kirkby-in-Furness Milnthorpe Meathop A65 Kirksanton Lindale Storth Gearstones Millom Kirkby Lonsdale Holme A595 Ulverston Hutton Roof Zone 4 Haverigg Grange-over-Sands Askam-in-Furness Chapel-le-Dale High Birkwith Swarthmoor Arnside & Burton-in-Kendal Leck Cark Silverdale AONB Yealand Whittington Flookburgh A65 Thursday A590 Redmayne Ingleborough National Bardsea Nature Reserve New Houses Dalton-in-Furness M6 Tunstall Ingleton A687 A590 Warton Horton in Kettlewell Arkholme Amcliffe Scales Capernwray Ribblesdale North Walney National Zone 5 Nature Reserve A65 Hawkswick Carnforth Gressingham Helwith Bridge Barrow-in-Furness Bentham Clapham Hornby Austwick Tuesday Bolton-le-Sands Kilnsey A683 Wray Feizor Malham Moor Stainforth Conistone Claughton Keasden Rampside Slyne Zone 6 Morecambe
    [Show full text]
  • For More Routes See
    SEDBERGH TO KIRKBY LONSDALE Start/Finish Sedbergh or Kirkby Lonsdale Distance 24 miles (39km). Refreshments Sedbergh, Barbon and Kirkby Lonsdale Toilets Sedbergh, Kirkby Lonsdale Nearest train station Oxenholme near Kendal This is a gentle route exploring the lush Lune Valley connecting the two lively market towns of Sedbergh and Kirkby Lonsdale. 1. Leave Sedbergh on Finkle Street (by the church) signposted to Dent. Straight over mini-roundabout, cross the River Rawthey and then take the first turn on the right signed Sedbergh Golf Course. 2. Go past the golf course, up a short climb and through a gate. At a T-junction turn right. Through a second gate and pass Holme Open Farm. 3. At the junction with the main road, turn left. Follow this road passing under a railway bridge, then turn left by Middleton Hall. 4. Follow this lovely lane for 3.5 miles through to Barbon where there is a pub and the Churchmouse café. Turn left and climb through the village passing the church. Shortly after crossing the cattle grid turn sharp right signposted to Casterton and Kirkby Lonsdale. 5. Follow this road for two miles to where it swings right to cross the old railway. Turn left here signed Cowan Bridge. Take the second turn on the right signed Casterton. Go straight over at the cross roads to reach the A683. 6. Turn left and after 200m you reach a parking area and Devil’s Bridge. Cross this stunning old stone bridge, up past the toilets to reach the busy A65. Push a short distance along the pavement and turn right into Kirkby Lonsdale town centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 27 2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton GCB KBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Professor Michael Chisholm Mr R R Thornton CB DL Sir Andrew Vheatley CBE To the Ht Hon Merlyn Rees, MF Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOK FUTURE ULECTOHAL ARRANGEMENTS FOK THE SOUTH LAKELAND DISTRICT IN THE COUNTY Ot1 CUMBRIA 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for South Lakeland district in accordance with the requirements of Section 63 of, and Schedule 9'to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that district. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in Section 60(1) and (2) of the T972 Act, notice was given on 19 August 1974 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the South Lakeland District Council, copies of which were circulated to Cumbria County Council, parish councils and parish meetings in the district, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Trades. Far 169
    WESTMORLAND.] TRADES. FAR 169 Burne John, 47a, Boroughgate,Applby Abram Thomas, Intack, Stainmore AlIen A. &; H. Nateby, Kirkby Stephn Chaplow J. & Sons. Helsington mills, North, Kirkby Stephen AHen J.Deepdale hall,Patterdala.Pnrth Kendal Addison Robert &; William, White AlIen J. Millrigg, New Bntton,Kendal Cherry Wm. Ed'Vfard, Bolton, Penrith stone, Newby, Penrith ..illen J a3. ISouthwaite, Mallerstang, Croft Herbert J. The Garages, Kendal Addison J.Halfpenny,Crosscrke.Kendal Kirkby Stephen &; Windermere. See advertise- Addison Joseph, Rowell, Heversham, Allen Thomas, Little Asby, Appleby ment Milnthorpe Allen William, Newbiggin-on-Lnne Day Harold H. Castle foundry, Kendal Airey Christopher & Richard, Shap Allinson Richd. &; Son, Fawcett park, George &; Jobling (Wilfred Anthony Airey James &; John, Tressonfield, Dufton, .A.ppleby Young, manager), Lake road, Bow- Middleton, Kirkby Lonsdale Allinson G. F. Highfield, Drybeck, ness, Windermere Airey Mrs.A. Miller !!rnd.Windermere Appleby Gilkes Gilbert &; 00. Limited, Canal, Airey Adam, Docker hall, Docker, Allinson J. Barwise hall, Hoff,Appleby iron works, Kendal Kendal Allinson Mrs. William, Archer hill, Knowles Bros. 2a. Bridge st. Appleby Airey Mrs. Catherine. Oaktree, Bar- Langdale. Tebay Tatham Isaac. Yard 59, Stramon- bon, Kirkby Lonsdale Allison Henry, Church Brough, gate, Kendal Airey Christopher, .Bracke~hi1l.~skew Kirkby Stephen Wilson William &; Co. 49 Strickland- head &; Low &; HIgh Cralg', BIrbeck Allison Mrs. J ane, Shoregill, Maller­ gate &; Woolpaek yard, Kendal Ft'lls. Shap 8tang, Kirkby Stephen Wright, Heaps & Westwood, Ann st. Airey Edmund. Eller gill, Tebay AlIi~on .Tohn. Glencoin, Glenridding, Kendal Airey Mrs. Elizabeth Ann, Newlands, l'enrith Drybeck. _~ ppleby A.1lison John, Maizonwath, Little Engineer-Mining. Airey Henry, Holme. Carnforth Asby, Appleby Borlase Wm.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Allithwaite Parish Council Chairman's Annual Report May 2019 – April 2020
    Lower Allithwaite Parish Council Chairman’s Annual Report May 2019 – April 2020 I have to start this year’s annual report on a sad note in that Cllr Mary Bird, who had been a long standing stalwart of the council and a dedicated teacher at Cartmel Primary school for many years, died suddenly on Wednesday 16th April 2020. She will be sadly missed and our condolences and thoughts are with family and friends. This year’s Annual Report on the activities of Lower Allithwaite Parish Council which is now subject to the Covid-19 restrictions on meetings and social isolation. The Parish Council has agreed the following during the current Covid-19 crisis: The Clerk Should the Clerk be infected and unable to continue then the Chairman would deal with business and delegate actions as he sees fit. Meetings All meeting have been put on hold from April to June 2020. Projects have gone into hibernation, planning committees have been suspended by SLDC, the only agenda item would be finance and currently all our providers have been advised that due to the current crisis, cheques for signing will have to wait until social exclusion is lifted. Delegation Council have delegated the following during the duration of the crisis: • Response to Correspondence – The Clerk - consultation with Chairman on sensitive matters. • Approval of Finance – Chairman – cheques will still need two signatures. This gives an overview by second councillor. The Clerk to arrange for signature. The Council has discharged its local duties always with the intention of securing the continued preservation of the amenities we enjoy.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirkby Lonsdale Conservation Area Character Appraisal
    Character Appraisal Kirkby Lonsdale Conservation Area Approved 13 February 2008 www.southlakeland.gov.uk Contents Kirkby Lonsdale Conservation Area Draft character appraisal: October 2007 ...................... 3 1.0 Introduction and legislative background ................................................................ 3 2.0 The location and demography of the town ............................................................ 4 3.0 Geology, geomorphology and landscape character .............................................. 5 4.0 Archaeological significance and potential ............................................................. 7 5.0 The origins and historic development of the town ................................................. 8 6.0 Conservation area analysis and evaluation ........................................................ 11 6.1 Conservation area appraisal: spatial structure .................................................... 15 6.2 Conservation area appraisal: townscape character ............................................ 17 6.3 Conservation area appraisal: architectural quality .............................................. 28 Table 1: Listed building descriptions ................................................................................... 31 Table 2: Unlisted building descriptions ................................................................................ 55 2 Kirkby Lonsdale Conservation Area Draft character appraisal: October 2007 1.0 Introduction and legislative background 1.1 Conservation Areas are
    [Show full text]