DOCSLIB.ORG

Measuring Humeral Head Translation After Suprascapular

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Measuring Humeral Head Translation After Suprascapular CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Oregon Scholars' Bank MEASURING HUMERAL HEAD TRANSLATION AFTER SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE BLOCK by BERNARDO G. SAN JUAN JR. A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Human Physiology and the Graduate School ofthe University of Oregon in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of Doctor ofPhilosophy September 2009 11 University of Oregon Graduate School Confirmation of Approval and Acceptance of Dissertation prepared by: Bernardo San Juan Title: "Measuring Humeral Head Translation After Suprascapular Nerve Block" This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the Doctor ofPhilosophy degree in the Department ofHuman Physiology by: Andrew Karduna, Chairperson, Human Physiology Li-Shan Chou, Member, Human Physiology Louis Osternig, Member, Human Physiology Stephen Frost, Outside Member, Anthropology and Richard Linton, Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies/Dean ofthe Graduate School for the University of Oregon. September 5, 2009 Original approval signatures are on file with the Graduate School and the University of Oregon Libraries. III © 2009 Bernardo G. San Juan Jf. IV An Abstract ofthe Dissertation of Bernardo G. San Juan Jr. for the degree of Doctor ofPhilosophy in the Department of Human Physiology to be taken September 2009 Title: MEASURING HUMERAL HEAD TRANSLATION AFTER SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE BLOCK Approved: Andrew R. Karduna, PhD Subacromial impingement syndrome is the most common disorder ofthe shoulder. Abnormal superior translation ofthe humeral head is believed to be one ofthe major causes ofthis pathology. The overall purpose ofthis study was to better understand glenohumeral kinematics in normal healthy individuals using fluoroscopy to help comprehend the mechanism ofshoulder impingement. This research was divided into three sections: a validation study to measure humeral head translation, a comparison between dynamic and static arm elevation and lastly, humeral head translation after a suprascapular nerve block. In the first study, fluoroscopy was used to take images ofhuman cadaver shoulders. Scapular orientation was manipulated in different positions while the humerus was at 90 degrees of elevation. Humeral head translation was measured using two v methods and was compared to the known translation. Additionally, the accuracy ofthe contour registration method to measure 2-D scapular rotations was assessed. For the second study, subjects elevated their dominant arm while fluoroscopic images were taken. An edge detection software was utilized to digitize points on both the humeral head and glenoid. Humeral head translation and scapular upward rotation were measured using a contour registration method with respect to the glenoid during arm elevation. Five different arm elevation angles were investigated to measure differences in humeral head translation between trials. There was no difference found between humeral head translation and scapular upward rotation between static and dynamic shoulder elevation. For the third study, humeral head translation was measured before and after a suprascapular never block. The humeral head was superiorly located and the scapula was more upwardly rotated after the block. The differences were observed during mid range ofmotion. This result showed that there was a compensatory increase in both humeral head translation and scapular upward rotation due to the nerve block. These results suggest that increasing muscular strength and endurance ofthe supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle could prevent any increased superior humeral head translation. This may be beneficial in preventing shoulder impingement or rotator cufftear over time. This dissertation includes unpublished co-authored materials. VI CURRICULUM VITAE NAME OF AUTHOR: Bernardo G. San Juan Jr. PLACE OF BIRTH: Marikina City, Philippines DATE OF BIRTH: May 4,1977 GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE SCHOOLS ATTENDED: University ofOregon San Diego State University University ofthe Philippines, Diliman DEGREES AWARDED: Doctor ofPhilosophy, 2009, University of Oregon Master ofArts, 2003, San Diego State University Bachelor of Science, 2000, University ofthe Philippines, Diliman AREAS OF SPECIAL INTEREST: Sports Medicine and Human Performance PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Graduate Teaching Fellow, Department ofHuman Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, 2004 - 2009 Graduate Research Fellow, Department ofHuman Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, 2004 - 2009 Adjunct Faculty, School ofHealth, Physical Education, and Athletics, Southwestern Community College, Chula Vista, CA, 2003 - 2004 National Athletic Trainer's Association, Certified Athletic Trainer, 2005 Vll GRANTS, AWARDS AND HONORS: Ursula (Sue) Moshberger Endowed Scholarship, Travel Grant, 2008 PUBLICATIONS: San Juan, JG., Karduna, AR: Measuring humeral head translation using fluoroscopy: A validation study. Journal ofBiomechanics. In review, 2009. San Juan, JG., Yaggie, JA., Levy, S., Mooney, V., Udermann, BE., Mayer, JM: Effects ofpelvic stabilization on lumbar muscle activity during dynamic exercise. Journal ofStrength and Conditioning Research. 19(4): 903-7, 2005. V111 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my mentor Dr. Andrew Karduna for all his guidance and patience in my entire stay here at the University ofOregon. It was a privilege working and learning under his tutelage. I am very blessed ofhaving Andy as my advisor. He taught me how to be a critical thinker and a problem solver. Andy helped me better understand what a sound research should be. In addition, he was the best player in our softball intramural team. Ifnot for him our team will be disorganized. I would like to thank Dr. Lou Osternig, Dr. Li-Shan Chou and Dr. Stephen Frost for all the insight they gave me in formulating and conducting my research. They all play an important role in making this a sound research study. Dr. Osternig was instrumental in reminding me about the clinical significance ofmy research. Moreover, he thoroughly inspected and recommended improvements for my manuscript. Dr. Chou was very helpful in making sure my protocol was proper for all my research study and how to appropriately analyze my data. I would like to thank Dr. Frost for sharing his expertise in the different techniques used in contour recognition in his field. I enjoyed all the meetings I had with everyone ofyou. I would like to thank my lab mates: Dave, Tal, Luke, Carl, Tola and Vamsi for all their help and support in data collection and for all the insights they gave me to make my research better. You guys made my stay here at the University of Oregon worthwhile. In addition, I would like to extend my gratitude to: Linden, Anni, Meagan, Mikey, Lindsey IX and Amanda for all their extra time and hard work in helping me collect and analyze the data. Ifnot for them I will not be done with my degree by now. I would like to thank Dianne Raponi for assisting in the data collection and Dr. Peter Kosek for the use ofthe fluoroscopy machine and performing the nerve block procedure. Ifnot for Dianne I would not be able to acquire quality fluoroscopic images. Dr. Kosek was very kind in taking time to perform the nerve block procedure with his busy schedule. Also, Mark Dow for developing the Space software I used to analyze my data. I would also like to thank all my friends: Eric, Cindie, Brent, Molly, and Vipul for all the support they gave me. They always made sure that I am in track in finishing my degree. Thanks for all the time we spent hiking and golfing that helped relieved my stress. I would like to thank my Aunt Luz and Lita, Uncle Dave and Gary, and my cousin Leo for helping me adjust to a new environment. They are always there to comfort me, and they always believe in me. Thanks for always being there for me. Most importantly, I would like to thank my family for all their support. I dedicate this degree to my parents who I know are always present and looking over me and guiding me through all my endeavors. Also special thanks to my sister, Normie, who is always there for me to hear my complaints about life and school and for all her support and guidance. This research was supported by NIOSH grant # 5ROI OH008288. x TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 Intrinsic Factors 3 Extrinsic Factors 5 Specific Aim and Hypotheses 9 Bridge ; 10 II. MEASURING HUMERAL HEAD TRANSLATION USING FLUOROSCOPY: A VALIDATION STUDY 12 Introduction 12 Methods 13 Specimens and Instrumentation 13 Protocol 14 Image Analysis 15 Results 17 Discussion 19 Bridge 20 III. MEASURING IN-VIVO HUMERAL HEAD TRANSLATION USING FLUOROSCOPY: A COMPARISON OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC POSITIONING 22 Introduction 22 Methods 24 Subjects 24 Protocol 25 Kinematic Measurement 28 Data Analysis 30 Results 30 Discussion 33 Conclusions 35 Bridge 35 IV. HUMERAL HEAD TRANSLATION AFTER A SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE BLOCK 36 Introduction 36 Materials and Methods 38 Statistical Analysis 47 Results 49 Xl Chapter Page Force Measurement 49 Glenohumeral Translation and Scapular Upward Rotation 50 EMG Muscle Activation 50 Discussion 53 V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 57 Strength ofthe Study 60 Limitations ofthe Study 61 Recommendations for Future Research 62 APPENDICES 64 A. CONSE:t\TT FORM STlTDY 2 : 64 B. CONSENT FORM STlTDY 3 67 C. SUBJECT INTAKE FORM 71 REFERENCES 72 XlI LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 2.1. Shoulder Jig 14 2.2. Digital image with points and digitized contours 17 2.3. Superior translation RMS error between the two methods 18 3.1. Subject set-up with the customized elevation guide 27 3.2. Digital x-ray image with a representation ofdigitized points 29 3.3. The difference between static and dynamic conditions in measured humeral head translation during the non-weighted trial 31 3.4. The difference between static and dynamic conditions in scapular upward rotation during the non-weighted trial 31 3.5. The difference between static and dynamic conditions in measured humeral head translation during the weighted trial 32 3.6. The difference between static and dynamic conditions scapular upward rotation during the weighted trial 32 4.1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Suprascapular Poster NANS
    Novel Lead Placement for Suprascapular Nerve Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Adrian Darryll Sulindro MD, David Spinner DO, Michael Gofeld Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliate of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY Introduction Case Description Discussion Peripheral nerve stimulation is often times used more for chronic An 82 year old male with chronic right shoulder pain, multifactorial in Shoulder pain is very important and prevalent in western society with a one-year prevalence of 4.7 - 46.7% (1). The etiology of chronic shoulder pain is very diverse and can include musculoskeletal and nerve related pains. Peripheral nerve stimulation origin due to osteoarthritis, chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy and orthopedic conditions but also non-orthopedic causes such as cervical radiculopathy, and in of the suprascapular nerve is one of the most common nerves post herpetic neuralgia was evaluated for peripheral nerve our patients case also post herpetic neuralgia. This can limit a patient's ability for his daily targeted for shoulder pain. Here we demonstrate a new novel lead stimulation. His pain is chronic in origin, having been present for over activities and causes burdens on both the patient and society around him. The suprascapular nerve is considered one of the important nerves in the shoulder region. It contains both the placement technique for suprascapular nerve stimulation. 10 years, was described as intense burning sensation, and rating a motor fibers to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles, and is a major part of sensory constant 8/10 on a numeric pain rating scale. Physical therapy, innervation of the shoulder which also includes the axillary nerve.
    [Show full text]
  • Examination of the Shoulder Bruce S
    Examination of the Shoulder Bruce S. Wolock, MD Towson Orthopaedic Associates 3 Joints, 1 Articulation 1. Sternoclavicular 2. Acromioclavicular 3. Glenohumeral 4. Scapulothoracic AC Separation Bony Landmarks 1. Suprasternal notch 2. Sternoclavicular joint 3. Coracoid 4. Acromioclavicular joint 5. Acromion 6. Greater tuberosity of the humerus 7. Bicipital groove 8. Scapular spine 9. Scapular borders-vertebral and lateral Sternoclavicular Dislocation Soft Tissues 1. Rotator Cuff 2. Subacromial bursa 3. Axilla 4. Muscles: a. Sternocleidomastoid b. Pectoralis major c. Biceps d. Deltoid Congenital Absence of Pectoralis Major Pectoralis Major Rupture Soft Tissues (con’t) e. Trapezius f. Rhomboid major and minor g. Latissimus dorsi h. Serratus anterior Range of Motion: Active and Passive 1. Abduction - 90 degrees 2. Adduction - 45 degrees 3. Extension - 45 degrees 4. Flexion - 180 degrees 5. Internal rotation – 90 degrees 6. External rotation – 45 degrees Muscle Testing 1. Flexion a. Primary - Anterior deltoid (axillary nerve, C5) - Coracobrachialis (musculocutaneous nerve, C5/6 b. Secondary - Pectoralis major - Biceps Biceps Rupture- Longhead Muscle Testing 2. Extension a. Primary - Latissimus dorsi (thoracodorsal nerve, C6/8) - Teres major (lower subscapular nerve, C5/6) - Posterior deltoid (axillary nerve, C5/6) b. Secondary - Teres minor - Triceps Abduction Primary a. Middle deltoid (axillary nerve, C5/6) b. Supraspinatus (suprascapular nerve, C5/6) Secondary a. Anterior and posterior deltoid b. Serratus anterior Deltoid Ruputure Axillary Nerve Palsy Adduction Primary a. Pectoralis major (medial and lateral pectoral nerves, C5-T1 b. Latissimus dorsi (thoracodorsal nerve, C6/8) Secondary a. Teres major b. Anterior deltoid External Rotation Primary a. Infraspinatus (suprascapular nerve, C5/6) b. Teres minor (axillary nerve, C5) Secondary a.
    [Show full text]
  • The SPA Arrangement of the Branches of the Upper Trunk of the Brachial Plexus: a Correction of a Longstanding Misconception and a New Diagram of the Brachial Plexus
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION J Neurosurg 125:350–354, 2016 The SPA arrangement of the branches of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus: a correction of a longstanding misconception and a new diagram of the brachial plexus Amgad Hanna, MD Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin OBJECTIVE Brachial plexus (BP) diagrams in most textbooks and papers represent the branches and divisions of the upper trunk (UT) in the following sequence from cranial to caudal: suprascapular nerve, anterior division, and then posterior division. This concept contradicts what is seen in the operating room and is noticed by most peripheral nerve surgeons. This cadaveric study was conducted to look specifically at the exact pattern of branching of the upper trunk of the BP. METHODS Ten cadavers (20 BPs) were dissected. Both supra- and infraclavicular exposures were performed. The clavicle was retracted or resected to identify the divisions of the BP. A posterior approach was used in 2 cases. RESULTS In all dissections the origin of the posterior division was in a more cranial and dorsal plane in relation to the anterior division. In most dissections the supra scapular nerve branched off distally from the UT, giving it the appearance of a trifurcation, taking off just cranial and dorsal to the posterior division. The branching pattern of the UT consistently had the following sequential arrangement from cranial and posterior to caudal and anterior: suprascapular nerve (S), posterior division (P), and anterior division (A), hence the acronym SPA. CONCLUSIONS Supraclavicular exposure of the BP exposes only the trunks and divisions. Recognizing the “SPA” arrangement of the branches helps in identifying the correct targets for neurotization, especially given that these 3 branches are the most common targets for BP repair.
    [Show full text]
  • Posterior Approach Technique for Accessory-Suprascapular Nerve Transfer: a Cadaveric Study of the Anatomical Landmarks and Number of Myelinated Axons
    Clinical Anatomy 20:140–143 (2007) ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION Posterior Approach Technique for Accessory-Suprascapular Nerve Transfer: A Cadaveric Study of the Anatomical Landmarks and Number of Myelinated Axons D. PRUKSAKORN,1* K. SANANPANICH,1 S. KHUNAMORNPONG,2 3 1 S. PHUDHICHAREONRAT, AND P. CHALIDAPONG 1Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand 2Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand 3Department of Pathology, Prasat Neurological Institute, Bangkok, Thailand Accessory-suprascapular nerve transfer by the anterior supraclavicular app- roach technique was suggested to ensure transferrance of the spinal accessory nerve to healthy recipients. However, a double crush lesion of the suprascapu- lar nerve might not be sufficiently demonstrated. In that case, accessory- suprascapular nerve transfer by the posterior approach would probably solve the problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomical landmarks and histomorphometry of the spinal accessory and suprascapular nerve in the posterior approach. Dissection of fresh cadaveric shoulder in a prone position identified the spinal accessory and suprascapular nerve by the trapezius mus- cle splitting technique. After that, nerves were taken for histomorphometric evaluation. The spinal accessory nerve was located approximately halfway between the spinous process and conoid tubercle. The average distance from the conoid tubercle to the suprascapular nerve (medial edge of the suprascap- ular notch) is 3.3 cm. The mean number of myelinated axons of the spinal accessory and suprascapular nerve was 1,603 and 6,004 axons, respectively. The results of this study supported the brachial plexus reconstructive sur- geons, who carry out accessory-suprascapular nerve transfer by using the posterior approach technique.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorsal Scapular Nerve Neuropathy: a Narrative Review of the Literature Brad Muir, Bsc.(Hons), DC, FRCCSS(C)1
    ISSN 0008-3194 (p)/ISSN 1715-6181 (e)/2017/128–144/$2.00/©JCCA 2017 Dorsal scapular nerve neuropathy: a narrative review of the literature Brad Muir, BSc.(Hons), DC, FRCCSS(C)1 Objective: The purpose of this paper is to elucidate Objectif : Ce document a pour objectif d’élucider this little known cause of upper back pain through a cette cause peu connue de douleur dans le haut du narrative review of the literature and to discuss the dos par un examen narratif de la littérature, ainsi que possible role of the dorsal scapular nerve (DSN) in de discuter du rôle possible du nerf scapulaire dorsal the etiopathology of other similar diagnoses in this (NSD) dans l’étiopathologie d’autres diagnostics area including cervicogenic dorsalgia (CD), notalgia semblables dans ce domaine, y compris la dorsalgie paresthetica (NP), SICK scapula and a posterolateral cervicogénique (DC), la notalgie paresthésique (NP), arm pain pattern. l’omoplate SICK et un schéma de douleur postéro- Background: Dorsal scapular nerve (DSN) latérale au bras. neuropathy has been a rarely thought of differential Contexte : La neuropathie du nerf scapulaire dorsal diagnosis for mid scapular, upper to mid back and (NSD) constitue un diagnostic différentiel rare pour la costovertebral pain. These are common conditions douleur mi-scapulaire, costo-vertébrale et au bas/haut presenting to chiropractic, physiotherapy, massage du dos. Il s’agit de troubles communs qui surgissent therapy and medical offices. dans les cabinets de chiropratique, de physiothérapie, de Methods: The methods used to gather articles for this massothérapie et de médecin. paper included: searching electronic databases; and Méthodologie : Les méthodes utilisées pour hand searching relevant references from journal articles rassembler les articles de ce document comprenaient la and textbook chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Suprascapular Nerve Block a Narrative Review
    REVIEW ARTICLE Suprascapular Nerve Block A Narrative Review Chin-wern Chan, MBBS, FANZCA and Philip W.H. Peng, MBBS, FRCPC discussed. A summary of the evidence level for the use of SSNB Abstract: Suprascapular nerve blockade (SSNB) is a simple and safe will be presented. technique for providing relief from various types of shoulder pain, including rheumatologic disorders, cancer, and trauma pain, and post- operative pain due to shoulder arthroscopy. Posterior, superior, and REVIEW METHODS anterior approaches may be used, the most common being the posterior. We performed a literature search for journal articles writ- Recently, an ultrasound-guided approach has been described. In this ten in English in the PubMed database from January 1986 to review, the basic anatomy of the suprascapular nerve will be described. December 2010. The electronic search strategy contained the The different techniques of SSNB and indications for SSNB will be following medical subject headings and free text terms: supra- discussed. The complications of SSNB and outcomes of SSNB on the scapular nerve block, pain management, and complications of management of acute and chronic shoulder pain will be reviewed. suprascapular nerve block. We excluded trials before 1986 be- cause these were deemed out of date and superseded by more (Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011;36: 358Y373) recent studies in terms of clinical evidence. We excluded ab- stracts older than 3 years, isolated case reports (eg, cancer pain), and correspondence articles. Although we included articles in- volving a case series, we limited these to studies involving he suprascapular nerve (SSN) is the major sensory nerve more than 10 patients unless the series contained some very T to the shoulder, especially in the posterior and superior interesting findings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Review of Anatomy and Regional Anesthesia Techniques of Clavicle Surgeries
    vv ISSN: 2641-3116 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/ojor CLINICAL GROUP Received: 31 March, 2021 Research Article Accepted: 07 April, 2021 Published: 10 April, 2021 *Corresponding author: Dr. Kartik Sonawane, Uncovering secrets of the Junior Consultant, Department of Anesthesiol- ogy, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals, Pvt. Ltd. Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, E-mail: beauty bone: A comprehensive Keywords: Clavicle fractures; Floating shoulder sur- gery; Clavicle surgery; Clavicle anesthesia; Procedure review of anatomy and specific anesthesia; Clavicular block regional anesthesia techniques https://www.peertechzpublications.com of clavicle surgeries Kartik Sonawane1*, Hrudini Dixit2, J.Balavenkatasubramanian3 and Palanichamy Gurumoorthi4 1Junior Consultant, Department of Anesthesiology, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals, Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India 2Fellow in Regional Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals, Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India 3Senior Consultant, Department of Anesthesiology, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals, Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India 4Consultant, Department of Anesthesiology, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals, Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India Abstract The clavicle is the most frequently fractured bone in humans. General anesthesia with or without Regional Anesthesia (RA) is most frequently used for clavicle surgeries due to its complex innervation. Many RA techniques, alone or in combination, have been used for clavicle surgeries. These include interscalene block, cervical plexus (superficial and deep) blocks, SCUT (supraclavicular nerve + selective upper trunk) block, and pectoral nerve blocks (PEC I and PEC II). The clavipectoral fascial plane block is also a safe and simple option and replaces most other RA techniques due to its lack of side effects like phrenic nerve palsy or motor block of the upper limb.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Tolerability of Suprascapular and Median Nerve Blocks for the Treatment of Shoulder-Hand Syndrome - a Feasibility Study
    Assessing the tolerability of suprascapular and median nerve blocks for the treatment of shoulder-hand syndrome - a feasibility study OSHN-REB: 20170066-01H Bruyere REB: M16-17-024 NCT03291197 Date: April 8 2017 Assessing the tolerability of suprascapular and median nerve blocks for the treatment of shoulder-hand syndrome - a feasibility study INTRODUCTION Background and Rationale Chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating, painful condition characterized by severe pain of the shoulder and hand. It may occur in multiple settings, including post- trauma, post-surgery, or in the hemiparetic upper limb following a stroke. When this occurs in stroke patients, it is also referred to as shoulder-hand syndrome (SHS). In SHS, the stroke- affected upper extremity shows pathologic alterations including vasomotor (changes in temperature and skin colour); sudomotor (sweating and edema); motor signs/symptoms (weakness and tremor); trophic alterations of nails, hair, skin as well as joint contractures (Harden 2013). SHS is highly prevalent in the stroke population, affecting as many as 25% of these patients in Canada (Tepperman 1984). Due to its progressive nature, SHS frequently leads to severe functional impairment and chronic morbidity. Thus, SHS has a significant impact on stroke recovery, patients’ ability to regain independence, and community reintegration (Kang 2012). The pathophysiology of SHS is poorly understood. The two most commonly accepted mechanisms include neurogenic inflammation and/or autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Bussa 2015). Neurogenic inflammation may occur secondary to increased pro-inflammatory cytokines in the blood plasma and cerebral spinal fluid (Bussa 2013 and Taha 2007), and is supported by effective treatment with corticosteroids (Braus 1994; Kalita 2006; Rah 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Electrodiagnosis of Brachial Plexopathies and Proximal Upper Extremity Neuropathies
    Electrodiagnosis of Brachial Plexopathies and Proximal Upper Extremity Neuropathies Zachary Simmons, MD* KEYWORDS Brachial plexus Brachial plexopathy Axillary nerve Musculocutaneous nerve Suprascapular nerve Nerve conduction studies Electromyography KEY POINTS The brachial plexus provides all motor and sensory innervation of the upper extremity. The plexus is usually derived from the C5 through T1 anterior primary rami, which divide in various ways to form the upper, middle, and lower trunks; the lateral, posterior, and medial cords; and multiple terminal branches. Traction is the most common cause of brachial plexopathy, although compression, lacer- ations, ischemia, neoplasms, radiation, thoracic outlet syndrome, and neuralgic amyotro- phy may all produce brachial plexus lesions. Upper extremity mononeuropathies affecting the musculocutaneous, axillary, and supra- scapular motor nerves and the medial and lateral antebrachial cutaneous sensory nerves often occur in the context of more widespread brachial plexus damage, often from trauma or neuralgic amyotrophy but may occur in isolation. Extensive electrodiagnostic testing often is needed to properly localize lesions of the brachial plexus, frequently requiring testing of sensory nerves, which are not commonly used in the assessment of other types of lesions. INTRODUCTION Few anatomic structures are as daunting to medical students, residents, and prac- ticing physicians as the brachial plexus. Yet, detailed understanding of brachial plexus anatomy is central to electrodiagnosis because of the plexus’ role in supplying all motor and sensory innervation of the upper extremity and shoulder girdle. There also are several proximal upper extremity nerves, derived from the brachial plexus, Conflicts of Interest: None. Neuromuscular Program and ALS Center, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, PA, USA * Department of Neurology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, EC 037 30 Hope Drive, PO Box 859, Hershey, PA 17033.
    [Show full text]
  • Lateral Pectoral Nerve Transfer for Spinal Accessory Nerve Injury
    TECHNICAL NOTE J Neurosurg Spine 26:112–115, 2017 Lateral pectoral nerve transfer for spinal accessory nerve injury Andrés A. Maldonado, MD, PhD, and Robert J. Spinner, MD Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota Spinal accessory nerve (SAN) injury results in loss of motor function of the trapezius muscle and leads to severe shoul- der problems. Primary end-to-end or graft repair is usually the standard treatment. The authors present 2 patients who presented late (8 and 10 months) after their SAN injuries, in whom a lateral pectoral nerve transfer to the SAN was per- formed successfully using a supraclavicular approach. http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2016.5.SPINE151458 KEY WORds spinal accessory nerve; cranial nerve XI; lateral pectoral nerve; nerve injury; nerve transfer; neurotization; technique PINAL accessory nerve (SAN) injury results in loss prior resection, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. The of motor function of the trapezius muscle and leads left SAN was intentionally transected due to the proximity to weakness of the shoulder in abduction, winging of the cancer to it. The right SAN was identified, mobi- Sof the scapula, drooping of the shoulder, and pain and lized, and preserved as part of the lymph node dissection. stiffness in the shoulder girdle. The majority of the cases Postoperatively, the patient experienced severely impaired of SAN injury occur in the posterior triangle of the neck. active shoulder motion bilaterally, with shoulder pain. On When the SAN is transected or a nonrecovering neuro ma- physical examination, the patient showed bilateral trape- in-continuity is observed, the standard treatment would zius muscle atrophy and moderate left scapula winging.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Neuroanatomic Understanding of the Shoulder and Implications for Pain Management
    Advanced Neuroanatomic Understanding of The Shoulder and Implications for Pain Management Maxim S. Eckmann, MD Professor/Clinical, Department of Anesthesiology Executive Director of Pain Medicine University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Disclosures ▪ Employment ▪ University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio ▪ Research Support ▪ Avanos Medical Inc – cadaver donation ▪ Fellowship Education Grants ▪ Abbot ▪ Boston Scientific ▪ Medtronic ▪ Speaker Panel / Course Director ▪ Dannemiller, Inc. ▪ American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine ▪ Investments ▪ Insight Dental Systems ▪ iKare MTRC (Behavioral Health) Leveraging Increasingly Peripheral Nerve Blockade in Acute and Chronic Pain Gains and Losses ISB (interscalene block); STB (superior trunk block); LPB (lumbar plexus block); ACB (adductor canal block); Road Map: Joint Analgesia Progression LFCN (lateral femoral cutaneous nerve); IPACK (infiltration between popliteal artery and capsule of knee); PECS (pectoralis block) Plexus Level Peripheral Nerve, Plane Level *,** Articular Level** Field** Suprascap* Sup Cerv Plx Articular Ns ISB Shoulder Axillary* PECS I,II ? SS, Ax, LP, STB*? Lateral Pec* (adjunct)* SubScap… Femoral Joint / ACB** / Knee Neuraxial LPB Sciatic Genicular Ns Wound IPACK** Obturator Injection Femoral “3-in-1” LPB Articular Ns Hip Sciatic ?Quad Fem / SPB Fem / Obt Obturator Sup Glut * Diaphragm Sparing **Motor Movement Sparing Proximal: Progressive loss of: o Dermatome o Cutaneous, muscular anesthesia. Distal: o Myotome/Sclerotome o Osteotome/Capsulotome o Osteotome/Capsulotome Progressive gain of: o Motor Block o Motor function o Motor preservation Evolving understanding: Shoulder Joint Selected Developments in Regional Anesthesia for the Upper Extremity and Shoulder • Axillary (brachial plexus) block • Interscalene Block • Complications Interscalene Block Development and Complications • Multiple Approaches (e.g. Anterolateral, Posterior, etc.) • Single Injection and Continuous Techniques 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 06 Chang Nerve Injuries [Compatibility Mode]
    12/9/2016 CHANG CJ Disclosures I have nothing to disclose UCSF 11 th Annual Primary Care Sports Medicine Conference: Upper Extremity Stingers, Burners, and Cindy J. Chang, M.D. Winging: Associate Professor Primary Care Sports Nerve Injuries of the Upper Medicine Extremity December 9, 2016 2 CHANG CJ CHANG CJ Objectives Exam Room Tips • Stock gowns/sheets and paper shorts in the room • Review common upper extremity nerve injuries • Be able to get to both sides of the exam table seen in athletes • Have a step stool handy • Discuss return to play issues concerning specific upper extremity nerve issues 4 5 1 12/9/2016 CHANG CJ CHANG CJ Case #1 Case #1 • 1994 AFC Championship Game • San Diego Charger upset the favored Pittsburgh Steelers 17-13 • Junior Seau recorded 16 tackles and a forced fumble despite: – Not being able to lift his arm above his shoulder – Playing with a bad left shoulder – Having a pinched nerve in his neck 6 7 CHANG CJ CHANG CJ “Arm not fine? First Clear the Spine!” Taking a Really Good History • Chief complaint -- eg, pain, numbness, weakness, location of symptoms? • Use a visual analogue scale -- patient's perceived level of pain • Anatomic pain drawings -- quick review of pain pattern. 8 10 2 12/9/2016 CHANG CJ CHANG CJ Taking a Really Good History Taking a Really Good History • Onset, mechanism, what was done at that time? • Has the patient experienced previous episodes of similar symptoms or localized neck pain? When and • How do activities and head positions affect for how long? What helped? Other spine pain? symptoms?
    [Show full text]