DOCSLIB.ORG

The Sasanian Twin Pillar Ossuaries at Shoush Village, Kohgiloyeh Va Boyer Ahmad (Iran)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Sasanian Twin Pillar Ossuaries at Shoush Village, Kohgiloyeh Va Boyer Ahmad (Iran) IranicaAntiqua, vol. L, 2015 doi: 10.2143/IA.50.0.3053525 DO GUR-E DOPA: THE SASANIAN TWIN PILLAR OSSUARIES AT SHOUSH VILLAGE, KOHGILOYEH VA BOYER AHMAD (IRAN) BY Mahdokht FARJAMIRAD (Ghent University) Abstract: The pillar ossuary is a unique but a less known type of Sasanian bone receptacle that has mainly been reported from Fars. This article introduces newly discovered twin pillar ossuaries south of Basht, in southern Kohgiloyeh va Boyer Ahmad Province. During the Sasanian period this region was situated in northern Pārs that is still one of the poorly known areas in Iranian archaeology. Keywords: Kohgiloyeh va Boyer Ahmad, northern Pārs, pillar ossuary, astodan, Zoroastrianism, Sasanian, bone receptacle. Introduction Pillar ossuaries were frequently reported from the area of Istakhr as well as northern Sasanian Pārs. Pārs province was located in the southern quadrant of the Sasanian Empire between Kirman in the east, Khuzistan in the west, and Pahlaw (Isfahan) in the north (Miri 2012: 25). Do-Gur-e Dopa is one of a few examples of pillar astodans in northern Pārs that, based on the geographical administrative division of the Sasanian period, was likely part of the districts of Shapur Xwarrah (Istakhri: 102) or Veh-Az-Amid-Kavād (Gyselen 1989: 72 & 98). In early Islamic sources this area was on the way from Shiraz to Arrajān (near modern Behbahan) (Gaube 1986; Eqtedari 1989; Miri 2012: 131). In the modern geographi- cal division Do-Gur-e Dopa is located in the south of Kohgiloyeh va Boyer Ahmad province. The aim of this paper is to introduce the twin pillar ossuaries of Do Gur-e Dopa as one of the few known Sasanian archaeological remains in this region, which is indeed one of the least archaeologically known regions in the Zagros Mountains. Until now, many papers were written about 97513.indb 357 23/02/15 10:18 358 M. FARJAMIRAD Sasanian administrative geography, but the absence of archaeological evi- dence from this area has always been the major obstacle to the reconstruc- tion of the administrative status of northern Pārs (southern Kohgiloyeh va Boyer Ahmad) during Sasanian times (see Gyselen 1989; see also Gignoux 1971 & 2004). The twin pillar ossuaries highlight the importance of this area in the Sasanian period. Pillar ossuaries in Fars Among various types of Sasanian astodans the pillar ossuary is perhaps a less familiar type, mainly because its function as a bone receptacle was always a matter of discussion. However, the recent discovery of twin pillar ossuaries with funerary inscriptions at the Sasanian cemetery of Tang-e Djelo, north of Yasuj, may put an end to all these debates (Nasrollah Zadeh & Javeri 2002: 71-76). Earlier, another Pahlavi inscription on a reused Achaemenid column from Bagh-e Lardi, near Sivand, (translation in Henning 1958: 48 & Frye 1970: 176) was also interpreted as a proof for the funerary function of these pillars (Sprengling 1953: 70, 71, see also Huff 2004: 614). They have a cylindrical shaft fixed into a circular hollow in the rocky ground. One of the best-known examples of them is still partly insitu on the western corner of Kuh-e Hossein (Kleiss 1976: 144). Numer- ous similar hollows in the area of Kuh-e Hossein and Kuh-e Rahmat sug- gest the frequency of these pillars in central Pārs. These holes were first interpreted by Stronach (1966: 226) as fire bowls, but now it is commonly accepted that they originally were footings for disappeared pillar ossuaries like at Kuh-e Hossein, Qanat-e Bagh or Pengan. More round hollows in the rock as well as cylindrical pillar ossuaries were discovered by Vanden Berghe in 1962 in Semiroum (Vanden Berghe 1968: 43) and in the Sasanian cemetery of Tang-e Djelo (Vanden Berghe 1968: 8; see also Trümpelmann 1984: 326) eighty kilometres to the north of Yasuj. This cemetery is situated very close to the borders of Kohgiloyeh va Boyer Ahmad, but in modern geographical division it sits at the south- ernmost Isfahan Province. In 1968, Vanden Berghe discovered another pil- lar ossuary near the village of Pengan on the north-east border of Fars (Huff 1992: 210; Huff 2004: 612, fig. 9). Near the pillar some broken pieces of nicely cut stones had fallen on the ground. Huff composed these fragments to one piece and reconstructed the cupola-shaped lid on top of the pillar that was used as cover over the bones (Huff 1992: 207-217). His 97513.indb 358 23/02/15 10:18 DO GUR-E DOPA 359 reconstruction suggests that similar pillars in the area of Istakhr and in northern Sasanian Pārs most likely had a same additional structure on top that must have disappeared or that was destroyed in the course of time. Pillar ossuaries with square shafts are rare and belong to a less repre- sented type. The pillars of Qanat-e Bagh (Vanden Berghe 1984: 511-518, see also Huff 2004: 612 & 613) and Tang-e Karam (Huff 2004: 610 & 611) are the only available examples of square shaft pillar ossuaries in southern Fars. Though the use of astodan and bone receptacles were attested as far as the coasts of the Persian Gulf to the west, pillar ossuaries were mainly distributed to the centre and north-western part of Pārs prov- ince (Pl. 1). Twin pillar ossuaries of Do-Gur-e Dopa On the way from Fahlyan to Gachsaran in Basht district, to the south- east of Kohgiloyeh va Boyer Ahmad, there is a small village known as Shoush-e Sofla. The village is located some eight kilometres to the south of the city of Basht, i.e the centre of Basht district, in a fertile valley cov- ered by pastures and farms. In this village there are two pillar ossuaries one next to the other, locally known as Do Gur-e Dopa, on top of a mound surrounded by arable lands (Pl. 2 & 3). The surface of the mound is cov- ered by rubble and its soil is not suitable for cultivation. Stein, during his survey in the vicinity of Basht, proceeded from Kupun to Basht by the ancient road which passes through the gorge of Tang-e Pirin (Stein, 1940: 48). There is, therefore, no surprise why he has not noticed the pillars of Do Gur-e Dopa. The mound and the pillars are only quite visible from the modern road. That is how I discovered these monuments during a visit of the region in April 2013. This short visit only allowed me to photograph and measure the pillars and no test trenches were made next to the still standing ossuaries or in the seemingly natural mound. The name Do-Gur-e Dopa literary means two graves with two legs. and “Gowr” (Gabr)1 [گور] ”Nevertheless, in Persian script the words “Gur are written identical, but the former means a grave and the latter [گور] rather refers to a Zoroastrian or anything that belongs to the pre-Islamic :in Dehkhoda Dictionary; see also Ibn-e Balkhiگبر period of Iran (See 1 Gowr and Gabr are both of a same meaning, but its pronunciation in local dialects is sometimes different. 97513.indb 359 23/02/15 10:18 360 M. FARJAMIRAD 117). It suggests that the name of the pillars may not only refer to a grave but it also alludes to the pre-Islamic background of the pillars or to an unknown Zoroastrian person. One may, therefore, conclude that the name Do Gur (Gowr)-e Dopa was adopted during the Islamic period when the locals had still a dim memory of the pillars’ owners or their funerary function2. The cylindrical pillars were carved from two monolithic lime stone pieces and it seems that they were fixed directly into the ground, as no column basis is traceable. They have both an identical shape with cylindri- cal shafts and square-shaped top parts. Both shafts are eroded and nar- rowed in the middle. One of these pillars is slightly taller than the other, with a maximum height of 2.05 meters, while the other pillar is about 1.84 meters high (Pl. 4 & 5). On the square top part of each pillar there is a round cavity with an average diameter between 0.17 - 0.23 and 0.10 - 0.12 meters depth. No ridges around the circular depressions were to be observed, though it is likely that they functioned as bone containers. The smaller pillar is badly damaged on top, but the remaining parts clearly show that both top parts were alike (Pl. 5 & 6). It seems acceptable to sug- gest the former presence of a separately made dome-shaped lid over the circular cavities as at Pengan and as reconstructed by Huff (2004: 612, fig. 9). Around the pillars no pottery sherds or broken stone pieces were visible; therefore we are unaware of the type of lid or the presence of any other kind of structure on the mound. Concluding remarks In view of the absence of any inscription on the pillars of Do-Gur-e Dopa, we may not be able to date them accurately. But we know that stone receptacles and the use of ossuaries was a common practice among upper class citizens of the late Sasanian period, continuing into very early Islamic period (sixth and seventh c. AD). In fact, it was the result of a Zoroastrian religious prohibition that banned inhumation practices but kept the option of preserving the bones in a receptacle for those who could afford it (Ven- didad VI. 51). It may explain why the major impact of this prohibition is more evidenced in Pārs, the cultural and religious heartland of the Sasanian 2 The twin pillar ossuaries of Tang-e Djelo cemetery is also known by locals as Mil-e Gabr (Gabr pillar).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lecture 27 Sasanian Empire
    4/12/2012 Lecture 27 Sasanian Empire HIST 213 Spring 2012 Sasanian Empire (224-651 CE) Successors of the Achaemenids 224 CE Ardashir I • a descendant of Sasan – gave his name to the new Sasanian dynasty, • defeated the Parthians • The Sasanians saw themselves as the successors of the Achaemenid Persians. 1 4/12/2012 Shapur I (r. 241–72 CE) • One of the most energetic and able Sasanian rulers • the central government was strengthened • the coinage was reformed • Zoroastrianism was made the state religion • The expansion of Sasanian power in the west brought conflict with Rome Shapur I the Conqueror • conquers Bactria and Kushan in east • led several campaigns against Rome in west Penetrating deep into Eastern-Roman territory • conquered Antiochia (253 or 256) Defeated the Roman emperors: • Gordian III (238–244) • Philip the Arab (244–249) • Valerian (253–260) – 259 Valerian taken into captivity after the Battle of Edessa – disgrace for the Romans • Shapur I celebrated his victory by carving the impressive rock reliefs in Naqsh-e Rostam. Rome defeated in battle Relief of Shapur I at Naqsh-e Rostam, showing the two defeated Roman Emperors, Valerian and Philip the Arab 2 4/12/2012 Terry Jones, Barbarians (BBC 2006) clip 1=9:00 to end clip 2 start - … • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_WqUbp RChU&feature=related • http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&featu re=endscreen&v=QxS6V3lc6vM Shapur I Religiously Tolerant Intensive development plans • founded many cities, some settled in part by Roman emigrants. – included Christians who could exercise their faith freely under Sasanian rule • Shapur I particularly favored Manichaeism – He protected Mani and sent many Manichaean missionaries abroad • Shapur I befriends Babylonian rabbi Shmuel – This friendship was advantageous for the Jewish community and gave them a respite from the oppressive laws enacted against them.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Historical Imagination in Late Antique Iraq
    OXFORD EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES General Editors Gillian Clark Andrew Louth THE OXFORD EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES series includes scholarly volumes on the thought and history of the early Christian centuries. Covering a wide range of Greek, Latin, and Oriental sources, the books are of interest to theologians, ancient historians, and specialists in the classical and Jewish worlds. Titles in the series include: Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Transformation of Divine Simplicity Andrew Radde-Gallwitz (2009) The Asceticism of Isaac of Nineveh Patrik Hagman (2010) Palladius of Helenopolis The Origenist Advocate Demetrios S. Katos (2011) Origen and Scripture The Contours of the Exegetical Life Peter Martens (2012) Activity and Participation in Late Antique and Early Christian Thought Torstein Theodor Tollefsen (2012) Irenaeus of Lyons and the Theology of the Holy Spirit Anthony Briggman (2012) Apophasis and Pseudonymity in Dionysius the Areopagite “No Longer I” Charles M. Stang (2012) Memory in Augustine’s Theological Anthropology Paige E. Hochschild (2012) Orosius and the Rhetoric of History Peter Van Nuffelen (2012) Drama of the Divine Economy Creator and Creation in Early Christian Theology and Piety Paul M. Blowers (2012) Embodiment and Virtue in Gregory of Nyssa Hans Boersma (2013) The Chronicle of Seert Christian Historical Imagination in Late Antique Iraq PHILIP WOOD 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries # Philip Wood 2013 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2013 Impression: 1 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Kings, Priests and Gods on Sasanian Investiture Reliefs
    Iranica Antiqua, vol. XLVIII, 2013 doi: 10.2143/IA.48.0.2184703 AND MAN CREATED GOD? KINGS, PRIESTS AND GODS ON SASANIAN INVESTITURE RELIEFS BY Bruno OVERLAET 1 (Royal Museums of Art and History, Brussels / Ghent University) Abstract: An inscription on the Naqsh-i Rustam I rock relief identifies the two protagonists in the investiture scene as Ardashir I and Ahura Mazda. All investing authorities on the royal Sasanian reliefs are therefore commonly identified as Ahura Mazda. In view of conflicting historic information and unexplained varia- tions in the iconography of “Ahura Mazda”, a re-interpretation of the investiture reliefs is made. The inscription on Ahura Mazda’s horse at Naqsh-i Rustam appears to have been added at the end of Ardashir’s reign or early in Shapur I’s reign and the earliest reliefs are now considered to depict an investiture by a priest, instead of by Ahura Mazda. Once the inscription had been added to the Naqsh-i Rustam I rock relief, it changed from an investiture by a priest to one by a god, Ahura Mazda. Iconographic details that conflicted with this transformation (such as the barsum, attendant and possibly the “royal” tamga) were left out of the divine image in later representations of the investiture on horseback. The late Sasanian Taq-i Bustan III investiture on foot, up to now considered to be the investiture of Khusrow II by Ahura Mazda and Anahita, is equally interpreted as an investiture by clergy, in this case by representatives of the cults of these two gods, rather than by the gods themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Roman Frontier1
    Rome and the Worlds Beyond Its Frontiers Impact of Empire Roman Empire, c. 200 B.C.–A.D. 476 Edited by Olivier Hekster (Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) Editorial Board Lukas de Blois Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt Elio Lo Cascio Michael Peachin John Rich Christian Witschel VOLUME 21 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/imem Rome and the Worlds Beyond Its Frontiers Edited by Daniëlle Slootjes and Michael Peachin LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2016036673 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface. issn 1572-0500 isbn 978-90-04-32561-6 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-32675-0 (e-book) Copyright 2016 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi and Hotei Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Account of the Arabic Work Entitled " Nihd- Yatu'l-Irab Fi Akhbdri'l-Furs Iva'l-'Arab," Particularly of That Part Which Treats of the Persian Kings
    195 ART. X.—Some Account of the Arabic Work entitled " Nihd- yatu'l-irab fi akhbdri'l-Furs iva'l-'Arab," particularly of that part which treats of the Persian Kings. By EDWARD Gr. BROWNE, M.A., M.R.A.S. To the curious book of which the full title stands at the head of this article, I have already alluded in my communi- cation to the Journal of January, 1899, on The Sources of Dawlatshdh, pp. 51-53. I now propose to give such account of its contents as is possible within the limits here prescribed. For this purpose I have made use of the Cambridge Codex (belonging to the Burckhardt Collection) marked QQ. 225. Though the book is a rare one, at least three other manuscripts are known — two in the British Museum (see the old Arabic Catalogue, pp. 418 and 581)l and one (marked A. 1741) at Gotha. The last was used by Professor Noldeke, in his reference to the Nihayat, at pp. 475-476 of his excellent Geschichte . der Sasaniden. He describes it as "in the main a quite arbitrary recension of Dinawari, though here [namely, in the Romance of Bahrain Chubin] it had before it an essentially fuller text than this," and briefly characterizes it as " das seltsame, ziemlich schwindelhafte Werk." When I first lighted on the book at Cambridge, not being aware of the existence of other copies, or of Noldeke's unfavourable judgment as to its value, I was elated beyond measure, believing that I had at last found the substance of that 1 These MSS., marked Add.
    [Show full text]
  • A Modern Archaeology of the Sasanian Period: Former Limitations and New Perspectives
    Newsletter di Archeologia CISA, Volume 7, 2016, pp. 35-88 A MODERN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE SASANIAN PERIOD: FORMER LIMITATIONS AND NEW PERSPECTIVES Bruno Genito, Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale” Introduction* It is never easy to handle theoretical and methodological issues arising from a particular scientific topic in a kind of review of studies, which is, in its way, what is being presented here. Studies of the archaeology of the Sasanian period have been the subject of numerous acute and critical comments by distinguished scholars in the past, including Huff (1986, 302-308) and more recently as well (1998-2011). Those issues which have been handled, too, have clearly always somewhat suffered from a complex of inferiority to other periods of the history of ancient Iran which are considered by far, the most formative and important: the Achaemenid and the Islamic eras. And this in spite of the fact that the majority of scholars have looked upon the period in question as a real golden age of Persian culture and art, and that it was quite often mentioned in later Islamic sources (including the Shah-nameh by Firdousi), as in many ways an apogee of the fabulous, formidable and legendary Persian Empires. For many scholars the archaeology of the Sasanian period and also that of the early Islamic period, as Whitcomb rightly has pointed out (2010, 5), has always been considered a part of history, and especially of the history of art. This classification, set in stone, has had a long and respectable tradition so far, but at last it has begun to be seen from a different perspective by a growing number of scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 the Kushano-Sasanian Kingdom
    ISBN 978-92-3-103211-0 State organization and administration 4 THE KUSHANO-SASANIAN KINGDOM* A. H. Dani and B. A. Litvinsky Contents State organization and administration .......................... 107 Economy, society and trade ............................... 112 Religious life ...................................... 113 Cities, architecture, art and crafts ............................ 115 Languages and scripts .................................. 121 In the early centuries of the Christian era the names of two great empires stand out boldly in the history of Central Asia. The first was Kushanshahr, named after the Great Kushan emperors, who held sway from the Amu Darya (Oxus) valley to the Indus and at times as far as the Ganges. Here flourished the traditions of the Kushans, who had brought together the political, economic, social and religious currents of the time from the countries with which they had dealings (see Chapter 7). The second great empire (which rose to challenge Kushan power) was Eranshahr, which expanded both westward and eastward under the new Sasanian dynasty. Its eastern advance shook Kushan power to its foundation. State organization and administration According to Cassius Dio (LXXX, 4) and Herodian (VI, 2.2), Ardashir I (226– 241), who waged many wars, intended to reconquer those lands which had originally belonged to the Persians. He defeated the Parthian kings and conquered Mesopotamia – an event which led to his wars with the Romans. It is more difficult to judge his conquests in the east. According to the inscription of Shapur I (241–271) at Naqsh-i Rustam, ‘under the rule of * See Map 2. 107 ISBN 978-92-3-103211-0 State organization and administration shahanshah [king of kings] Ardashir’ were Satarop, king of Abrenak (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Idea of Iran
    The Idea of Iran: Nationalism, Identity and National Consciousness among Diaspora Iranians A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at George Mason University by Darius Salimi Bachelor of Arts George Mason University, 2011 Director: Cortney Hughes-Rinker, Professor Department of Sociology & Anthropology Fall Semester 2013 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Copyright: 2013 Darius Salimi All Rights Reserved ii Dedication To my Aunt Lori. You were and are my inspiration to make the most of myself. iii Acknowledgements I received a tremendous amount of invaluable guidance in the form of many tiresome hours editing this document, input and feedback on content, and help in focusing my arguments and making my voice come through from three seemingly tireless people: Dr. Cortney Hughes-Rinker, Dr. Christopher P. Thornton and Dr. David W. Haines. I thank Cortney for her patience with me as my director and calm and thoughtful responses to my many questions and concerns; Chris for his expertise on Iran, ancient and modern as well as his good humor; and Dr. Haines, one of my very first professors at GMU, for his insights into the structure and voice of this thesis as well as for his superb advice and teaching over the years. I would also like to thank my family for being supportive of my interests and passions as they have always been, especially my sister Arista. iv Table of Contents Page List of Tables ................................................................................................................... viii List of Figures ................................................................................................................. viiii Abstract .............................................................................................................................. ix Chapter 1: Importance of the Iranian Case ........................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2020 Concordia Theological Journal Vol. 7 Issue 1
    ISSN 2374-3573 Concordia University Wisconsin/Ann Arbor is a Lutheran higher education community committed to helping students develop in mind, body, and spirit for service to Christ in the church and the world Theology and Philosophy Faculty CUW ........................................................................................... Roland Cap Ehlke PhD, University of Wisconsin- Jonathan Mumme Milwaukee ThD, University of Tubingen Thomas Feiertag Daniel Paavola DMin, Trinity Evangelical Divinity Chair of Department School PhD, Concordia Seminary Brian German Gregory P. Schulz PhD, Wycliffe College, Toronto DMin; PhD, Marquette University Nathan Jastram Steve Smith PhD, Harvard University STM, Concordia Seminary Jason Lane Jason Soenksen ThD, University of Hamburg PhD, Hebrew Union College and the University of Cincinnati Angus Menuge PhD, University of Wisconsin-Madison Kurt Taylor DMin, Ashland Theological Seminary Aaron Moldenhauer PhD, Northwestern University Harald Tomesch ThD, Concordia Seminary Brian Mosemann STM, Concordia Seminary Kevin Voss DVM; PhD, St. Louis University Ronald Mudge PhD, Concordia Seminary Patrick Ferry PhD, University of Colorado, ex officio CUAA………………………………………………………………… Ryan Peterson Charles Schulz DMin, Trinity Evangelical STM, Concordia Seminary; MA, Washington University; MA, Stephen Parrish University of Virginia PhD, Wayne State Philip Penhallegon Theodore Hopkins PhD, Concordia Seminary PhD, Concordia Seminary Scott Yakimow PhD, University of Virginia Concordia Theological Journal editors: Scott Yakimow
    [Show full text]
  • An Exceptional Gold Coin of Shapur I
    An Exceptional Gold Coin of Shapur I e-Sasanika 4 ARMINE ZOHRABYAN 2009 History Museum of Armenia Recently we have had a chance to see a unique gold coin of Shapur I. Unfortunately the location of this coin today is unknown to us. At first sight, the coin looks like the usual issues of Shapur I (particularly the iconography in obverse), but exploration of some details in reverse give us cause to suppose that it was minted for a certain occasion. Shapur I continued the regional policy of his predecessor, Artashir I, from the beginning of his reign. A series of victories against the Roman Empire opened the way to conquer Armenia, which was the main success of Sasanian Iran in the West. Shapur I represented his glorious victories against Roman Empire in rock sculpture and took a new title, king of kings Iran and non‐Iran, as a result of his successful policy. Th. Noldeke has written: ʺIn inscriptions Shapur I called himself king of kings of Iran and non‐Iran and his father only king of kings of Iran. Thus we can conclude that Shapur I stretched far beyond the borders of his state, out of the country which called Iran at that time; it could refer to Armenia as well as to distant lands in Eastʺ. Shapur I overthrew the ruling dynasty of Armenian Arsacids, and Sasanian crown princes began to bear the title Great King of Armenia during a 26‐year period (261‐287). Most probably, after the victories against Rome, Shapur I felt bolder on the throne of Iran than his father did.
    [Show full text]
  • Patronizing Persians Constantine’S Letter to Shapur Ii
    one Patronizing Persians constantine’s letter to shapur ii from the outset of the fourth and fi nal book of his panegyrical Life of Constantine (VC), the Roman bishop and church historian Eusebius of Caesarea is keen to present the fi rst Christian emperor as a patron and phi- lanthropist of boundless generosity. Constantine, he tells us, insisted on “persistently providing repeated and continuous good works of every kind for all the inhabitants of every province alike.”1 So generous was the emperor that none who sought his favor was ever “disappointed in his expectations.” While Constantine bestowed rank, honor, and other benefi ts of land and riches upon those closest to him, he also “showed general fatherly concern for all.” According to Eusebius, the emperor granted formal titles to so many citizens that his bureaucrats had to invent new honorifi cs just so Constantine could “promote more persons.”2 Th e emperor slashed taxes on landowners. He readjusted the fi nancial contributions required from those who complained “that their estates were overburdened.”3 He even granted the losing party in the disputes he adjudi- cated money or land from his personal holdings. Th is was so that no one who had been in his presence should ever have reason to “depart disappointed and bitter.”4 1. Euseb. VC IV.1. All citations of the VC are from the translation of A. Cameron and S. G. Hall, Life of Constantine (Oxford: Clarendon, 1999). 2. VC IV.1. Such generosity was not unique to Constantine. Simon Corcoran points out that his role “as giver of justice and distributor of benefi ts, whether largesse, offi ces or immuni- ties,” was “hardly new” and not diff erent in kind from that of his predecessors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Incomparable Sassanids
    The Incomparable Sassanids. Shapur II (Shahpbur) using the Parthian shot whilst hunting lions. The Parthian shot was a strategy where cavalry, during war, pretended retreat and then turned around (but with feet firmly in the stirrups) to shoot arrows at the surprised enemy!! The Sassanian Empire,(226A.D.-651 A.D.), the third Iranian empire, after the more famous Achaemenid Empire, founded by Cyrus the Great, and the second, the Parthian Empire which was founded by an Iranian people from north-east Iran; the Sassanian Empire was founded by Ardadhir I in 226 A.D. starting in the province of Fars/Pars (where Persepolis is located.) Ardashir (226A.D.-241), was a descendant of a line of Zoroastrian priests of Anahita, in Istakhr, Persis (Pars), who at the beginning of the third century had acquired the governorship of Persis. His father Papag (also pronounced Papak and Babak), was originally the ruler of a small town called Kheir. The eponymous founder of the line was Ardashir I's paternal grandfather, Sassan, the great priest of this Temple of Anahita. After establishing his rule over Persis, Ardashir I rapidly extended his territory, demanding fealty from the local princes of Fars, and gaining control over the neighboring provinces of Kerman, Isfahan, Susiana, and Mesene. This expansion quickly came to the attention of Artabanus IV(Ardvan) (216â €“224), of Parthia, Ardashir I's overlord. Artabanus IV initially ordered the governor of Khuzestan to march against Ardashir in 224, but this ended up in a major victory for Ardashir. Artabanus himself marched, the second time, against Ardashir I in 224.
    [Show full text]