DOCSLIB.ORG

Attachment 1 Project Narrative

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Attachment 1 Project Narrative Attachment 1 Project Narrative www.essgroup.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Description and Location of Proposed West Point Project ............................................................... 2 2.1.1 Northern Interconnection ........................................................................................................ 3 2.1.2 Northern AC Cable Route ....................................................................................................... 3 2.1.3 Northern Converter Station ..................................................................................................... 4 2.1.4 Northern Land Cable Route .................................................................................................... 4 2.1.5 In-River Cable Route .............................................................................................................. 4 2.1.6 Southern Land Route .............................................................................................................. 8 2.1.7 Southern Converter Station .................................................................................................... 8 2.1.8 Southern AC Cable ................................................................................................................. 8 2.1.9 Southern Interconnection ........................................................................................................ 9 2.2 In-River Cable Coexistence with Champlain-Hudson Power Express ............................................. 9 2.2.1 West Point Project In-River Cable Installed Prior to CHPE Project Cable (Alternative 1A) ... 9 2.2.2 CHPE Project Cable Installed Prior to West Point Project In-River Cable (Alternative 1B) . 10 2.3 Description of Proposed Transmission Line ................................................................................... 11 2.3.1 Project Components ............................................................................................................. 12 2.3.2 320 kV DC Circuit .................................................................................................................. 12 2.3.2.1 In-River Cable .............................................................................................................. 12 2.3.2.2 HVDC Land Cable ....................................................................................................... 13 2.3.3 AC Land Cable ...................................................................................................................... 13 2.3.4 Fiber Optic Communications Cable ...................................................................................... 14 2.4 Description of Converter Stations ................................................................................................... 14 2.4.1 VSC-HVDC Converter Stations ............................................................................................ 14 2.4.2 Control and Protection .......................................................................................................... 16 2.4.3 Cooling Systems ................................................................................................................... 16 2.4.4 Fire Protection ....................................................................................................................... 16 2.5 Installation Methods and Means ..................................................................................................... 16 2.5.1 Anticipated Project Schedule ................................................................................................ 16 2.5.2 Cable System Installation ..................................................................................................... 17 2.5.2.1 Land Cables ................................................................................................................ 17 2.5.2.2 Landfall Transitions ..................................................................................................... 18 2.5.2.3 Horizontal Directional Drilling ...................................................................................... 19 2.5.2.4 In-River Cable .............................................................................................................. 22 2.5.3 Cable System Reliability ....................................................................................................... 24 2.5.4 Cable System Maintenance .................................................................................................. 24 2.5.5 Converter Station Construction ............................................................................................. 25 2.6 In-River Cable Burial Depth ............................................................................................................ 26 3.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................ 27 3.1 Purpose and Need .......................................................................................................................... 27 3.2 No Action Alternative ...................................................................................................................... 27 3.3 Selection of Interconnecting Substations ....................................................................................... 28 3.3.1 Criteria for Selection of Interconnecting Substations ............................................................ 28 3.3.2 Northern Interconnection Substation Alternatives ................................................................ 28 3.3.2.1 National Grid Leeds Substation ................................................................................... 28 3.3.2.2 Alternative Northern Interconnection Substations ....................................................... 28 3.3.3 Southern Interconnection Substation Alternatives ................................................................ 29 3.3.3.1 Buchanan Substation .................................................................................................. 29 3.3.3.2 Alternative Southern Interconnection Substations ...................................................... 29 3.3.4 Comparisons and Selection of Interconnection Substations ................................................ 29 © 2013 ESS Group, Inc. k:\w296-000 west point partners route concept\regulatory\usace\attachment 1_project narrative\attachment 1_proj. narrative.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) SECTION PAGE 3.4 Selection of Project Converter Station Locations ........................................................................... 29 3.4.1 Criteria for Selection of Converter Station Locations ............................................................ 29 3.4.2 Northern Converter Station ................................................................................................... 30 3.4.3 Southern Converter Station .................................................................................................. 31 3.4.4 Comparisons and Selection of Converter Station Locations ................................................ 31 3.5 Selection of Transmission Line Routes and Landfalls – Overview ................................................ 31 3.5.1 Overhead versus Buried ....................................................................................................... 31 3.5.2 Underground versus Underwater .......................................................................................... 32 3.5.3 Route and Landfall Alternatives ............................................................................................ 33 3.6 Selection of Transmission Line Routes .......................................................................................... 33 3.6.1 Criteria for Selection of Routes ............................................................................................. 33 3.6.2 Summary of Proposed Route (Preferred Alternative – R1) .................................................. 34 3.6.3 In-River Alternatives Evaluated ............................................................................................. 34 3.6.3.1 In-River Cable Coexistence with CHPE ...................................................................... 35 3.6.3.2 Alternative R2 .............................................................................................................. 35 3.6.3.3 Alternative R3A ............................................................................................................ 36 3.6.3.4 Alternative R3B ............................................................................................................ 36 3.6.3.5 Alternative R4 .............................................................................................................. 37 3.6.3.6 Alternative R5 .............................................................................................................. 38 3.6.3.7 Alternative R6 .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Facilities
    SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Facilities Status DEC Region NPDES ID Terminated 8 NYR00B679 Terminated 4 NYR00E979 Terminated 4 NYR00E094 Terminated 3 NYR00F907 Terminated 4 NYR00F128 Terminated 3 NYR00F294 Active 4 NYR00F440 Terminated 5 NYR00E193 Active 8 NYR00F759 No Exposure 1 NYR00G254 No Exposure 2 NYR00F729 Active 4 NYR00B055 Active 4 NYR00B054 No Exposure 8 NYR00G118 Active 3 NYR00B923 No Exposure 3 NYR00E656 Terminated 2 NYR00D894 No Exposure 1 NYR00F797 Active 3 NYR00B036 Page 1 of 1078 09/28/2021 SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Facilities Name of Facility Location of Facility J A YANSICK LUMBER CO STATE RTE 70 LOCHVUE SPRING AVE EXT MAIN BROTHERS OIL CO INC - ROXBURY TERMINAL 25 LOCUST ST MONDELEZ GLOBAL LLC - NEWBURGH 800 CORPORATE BLVD TRAVIS 8412 STATE HWY 7 WASSAIC PIT BOX 221A P&M BRICK LLC MARINE TERMINAL 2170 RIVER RD CLINTON QUARRY LOST NATION RD ELMIRA ROAD MATERIALSLLC 1 COUNTY ROUTE 77A AEROFLEX PLAINVIEW 35 S. SERVICE RD. PRATT INSTITUTE MANHATTAN CAMPUS OPERATIONS 142-144 W 14TH ST WEST SAND LAKE PIT 3600 STATE RTE 43 HEMSTREET PARK BANK 3040 RIVER ROAD LOVE BEETS 1150 LEE RDSECT A FIRST STUDENT INC #12370 32 FITCHETT WAY UNITED STATES MINT NYS RTE 218 SWING STAGING INCORPORATED 55-51 43RD ST L-3 NARDA-ATM 49 RIDER AVE JOSEPH Y. RESNICK AIRPORT 199 AIRPORT ROAD Page 2 of 1078 09/28/2021 SPDES Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) Facilities City of Facility Zip of Facility County Name Sector Code HUNT 14846 Livingston POESTENKILL 12140 Rensselaer ROXBURY 12474 Delaware NEWBURGH 12550 Orange MARYLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Principal Characteristics and Components
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Development of the Geomorphological Map for Governors Island, Ellis Island, and Liberty Island, Upper New York Bay Principal Characteristics and Components Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2016/1346 ON THE COVER Aerial imagery of (clockwise from left) Liberty Island, Ellis Island, and Governors Island, all managed by the National Park Service as part of the National Parks of New York Harbor. USDA Farm Service Agency imagery, obtained 15 July 2006 (pre- Sandy), extracted from Google Earth Pro on 21 April 2015. Development of the Geomorphological Map for Governors Island, Ellis Island, and Liberty Island, Upper New York Bay Principal Characteristics and Components Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2016/1346 Norbert P. Psuty, William Hudacek, William Schmelz, and Andrea Spahn Sandy Hook Cooperative Research Programs New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station Rutgers University 74 Magruder Road Highlands, New Jersey 07732 December 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City's Wastewater Treatment System
    New York City’s Wastewater Treatment System Cleaning the Water We Use • Protecting the Environment We Live In New York City Department of Environmental Protection Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor Emily Lloyd, Commissioner List of Acronyms NYCDEP . New York City Department of Environmental Protection NYSDEC . New York State Department of Environmental Conservation NYCDOS . New York City Department of Sanitation USEPA . United States Environmental Protection Agency NYPA . New York Power Authority NYCSWCD . New York City Soil and Water Conservation District ALS . American Littoral Society WPCP . Water Pollution Control Plant NYOFCo . New York Organic Fertilizer Company IPP . Industrial Pretreatment Program PERC . Perchloroethylene CSO . Combined Sewer Overflow EBPP . Enhanced Beach Protection Program MGD . Million Gallons per Day CWA . Clean Water Act PCB . Polychlorinated Biphenols PAHs . Poly-Aromatic Hydrocarbons BOD . Biochemical Oxygen Demand TSS . Total Suspended Solids DO . Dissolved Oxygen BNR . Biological Nutrient Removal New York City’s Wastewater Treatment System 1 Table of Contents How Water Gets to Us¬ . 4 History of New York City Water . 4 Wastewater Treatment – Past and Present . 5-6 Nitrogen Control Applied Research Program . 6 Wastewater Treatment Process . 7-9 Preliminary Treatment Primary Treatment Secondary Treatment Disinfection Sludge Treatment Thickening Digestion Sludge Dewatering Beneficial Use of Biosolids . 9 How Biosolids Are Used . 10-11 Land Application Composting Alkaline Treatment Heat Drying How New York City Protects Its Water Environment . 11 Testing New York City Waterways Environmental Concerns . 11 Toxic Substances Pollution Control Programs . 12-16 Industrial Pretreatment Program (IPP) Persistent Pollutant Track-down Program Perchloroethylene Program (PERC) Corrosion Control Program 2 New York City’s Wastewater Treatment System Pollution Control Programs Continued .
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Area: Health Advice on Eating the Fish You Catch
    MAPS NEW YORK INSIDE CITY AREA Health Advice on Eating Fish You Catch 1 Why We Have Advisories Fishing is fun and fish are an important part of a healthy diet. Fish contain high quality protein, essential nutrients, healthy fish oils and are low in saturated fat. However, some fish contain chemicals at levels that may be harmful to health. To help people make healthier choices about which fish they eat, the New York State Department of Health issues advice about eating sportfish (fish you catch). The health advice about which fish to eat depends on: Where You Fish Fish from waters that are close to human activities and contamination sources are more likely to be contaminated than fish from remote marine waters. In the New York City area, fish from the Long Island Sound or the ocean are less contaminated. Who You Are Women of childbearing age (under 50) and children under 15 are advised to limit the kinds of fish they eat and how often they eat them. Women who eat highly contaminated fish and become pregnant may have an increased risk of having children who are slower to develop and learn. Chemicals may have a greater effect on the development of young children or unborn babies. Also, some chemicals may be passed on in mother’s milk. Women beyond their childbearing years and men may face fewer health risks from some chemicals. For that reason, the advice for women over age 50 and men over age 15 allows them to eat more kinds of sportfish and more often (see tables, pages 4 and 6).
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson River – New York to Wappinger Creek NOAA Chart 12343
    BookletChart™ Hudson River – New York to Wappinger Creek NOAA Chart 12343 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Published by the northward from The Battery, the New York waterfront is an almost continuous line of wharves and piers, some of which can accommodate National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration the largest transatlantic liners. National Ocean Service On the opposite side of Hudson River from New York City are Jersey City, Office of Coast Survey Hoboken, Weehawken, West New York, Guttenberg, Edgewater, Fort Lee and Englewood Cliffs. The shoreline from Jersey City to Edgewater is www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov lined with ruined piers and piling fields. Mariners must check with local 888-990-NOAA authorities and property owners for approval prior to mooring. Channels.–The lower Hudson River has depths of 43 feet or more in What are Nautical Charts? midchannel from deep water in Upper New York Bay off Ellis Island to the upper limit of New York City’s major wharves at 59th Street, about Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show 5.3 miles above the entrance. Above this point, the Federal project water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much depth is 32 feet to Albany. (See Notice to Mariners and latest editions of more. The information is shown in a way that promotes safe and charts for controlling depths.) efficient navigation. Chart carriage is mandatory on the commercial Seasonal buoyage.–The lighted buoys marking the Hudson River ships that carry America’s commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Statement
    CITY ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT THE REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING SIPHONS BETWEEN BROOKLYN AND STATEN ISLAND ATTACHMENT PART I, GENERAL INFORMATION 3b. DESCRIBE THE ACTION(S) AND APPROVAL(S) BEING SOUGHT FROM OR UNDERTAKEN BY CITY (AND IF APPLICABLE, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES) AND, BRIEFLY, DESCRIBE THE DEVELOPMENT OR PROJECT THAT WOULD RESULT FROM THE PROPOSED ACTION(S) AND APPROVAL(S) The proposed action would involve the construction of a new potable water transmission main (siphon) beneath the Upper New York Bay between the boroughs of Brooklyn and Staten Island. The new siphon would replace two existing subaqueous water siphons (Siphon Nos. 1 and 2) located beneath Upper New York Bay. As part of the New York and New Jersey Harbor Deepening Project, the U.S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) will dredge the Anchorage Channel to a depth of 54 feet below mean low water (MLW). This dredging would expose and/or potentially impact the two existing siphons as they are not situated at a sufficient depth that would be protective of their continued use. The existing siphons provide the only secondary/backup water supply from Brooklyn to Staten Island. As part of the proposed action, the existing siphons would be decommissioned and abandoned and replaced with a new, single siphon. Development of the new siphon would provide a backup potable water supply system for Staten Island, thereby maintaining the reliability of the overall water supply system. The new siphon will also be utilized to supplement the existing primary water supply service to the borough.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City W Ater Tr Ail Guide
    BRONX BROOKLYN NEW JERSEY 11 BARRETTO POINT PARK i ² _ 23 NEWTOWN CREEK 44 16TH STREET PARK i ² _ Foot of Tiffany Street, Hunts Point Provost Street & Paidge Avenue, Greenpoint West Shore Drive and West 16th Street, Bayonne Launch from a concrete ramp on a cobble beach near the Tiered steps go straight into the water at a wastewater A concrete ramp and floating dock on Newark Bay parking lot or a sandy cove at the east end of the park. treatment plant, operated by the NYC Department of providing access to the Arthur Kill and the Hackensack Strong tidal currents and heavy traffic in the main Environmental Protection, which provides access to River. Season pass required from Bayonne municipality. shipping channel; restricted access on both Brother explore the industrial banks of Newtown Creek. Heavy commercial traffic near the containerport. Islands (bird sanctuaries) and prohibited at Rikers Commercial traffic; water not suitable for swimming. 45 LIBERTY STATE PARK i ² _ ´ GUIDE Island (city’s largest jail.) 24 MANHATTAN AVENUE i 200 Morris Pesin Drive, Jersey City 12 HUNTS POINT RIVERSIDE PARK i _ Manhattan Avenue Street-end, Greenpoint This small beach next to the boat ramp on the south side Edgewater Road & Lafayette Avenue, Hunts Point This new pocket park has a floating dock on Newtown of the 1100-acre park offers a good spot from which to MANHATTAN A gravel beach offers access to the sheltered waters of the Creek providing access to the Creek and East River. There explore the west side of the Upper Harbor. It’s a half-mile 1 INWOOD HILL PARK ² _ ´ Bronx River.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulster County Stormwater Management Program Plan
    Ulster County Stormwater Management Program Plan December 2013 Michael P. Hein County Executive Table of Contents Introduction and Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... 1 Public Contact Information ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Background Information ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Waterbodies of Concern .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Pollutants of Concern (POCs) ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Minimum Control Measures MCM 1: Public Education and Outreach on Stormwater Impacts .................................................................................11 MCM 2: Public Involvement/Participation ....................................................................................................................13 MCM 3: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) .......................................................................................15 MCM 4: Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control ................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Research Project Summary
    Division of Science, Research and Technology Research Project Summary December, 2006 The New Jersey Toxics Reduction Workplan for New York - New Jersey Harbor: Study I-E – Hydrodynamic Studies in the Newark Bay Complex Joel A. Pecchioli1, Michael S. Bruno2, Robert Chant3, Anne Marie Pence2, Alan F. Blumberg2, David Fugate3, Brian J. Fullerton2, Scott Glenn3, Chip Haldeman3, Eli Hunter3, and Kelly L. Rankin2 Abstract The Newark Bay Complex, which is part of New York-New Jersey (NY-NJ) Harbor, consists of Newark Bay, the Arthur Kill and Kill van Kull tidal straits, and the Passaic and Hackensack Rivers. The presence of toxic chemicals in water and sediments throughout the harbor has resulted in reduced water quality, fisheries restrictions/advisories, and general adverse impacts to the estuarine and coastal ecosystems. Study I-E of the New Jersey Toxics Reduction Workplan for NY- NJ Harbor is a comprehensive hydrodynamic study completed between the years 2000 and 2002 to begin to understand the effects of tidal, meteorological, and freshwater forces on circulation patterns in the system. In addition, a three- dimensional hydrodynamic model of the complex has been developed that replicates the available water elevation, salinity, and current velocity data. Circulation in the Newark Bay Complex responds to a combination of influences in a complex event-driven fashion, making the identification of a long-term average circulation pattern difficult. Within the navigation channel of Newark Bay, classic estuarine gravitational circulation occurs, with daily-averaged currents directed seaward near the surface and landward near the bottom. This circulation pattern can be broken down during periods of very low discharge from the Passaic River, such that daily-averaged currents are largely directed landward throughout most of the water column.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for Managing NYC's Streams
    Strategies for Managing NYC’s Streams City of New York Parks & Recreation Forestry, Horticulture, and Natural Resources Bill de Blasio, Mayor Mitchell J. Silver, Commissioner Rattlesnake Creek, Seton Falls Park, Bronx EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND regulations beginning in the 1970s resulted in significant improvements in water quality, and NYC’s Historically, nearly 250 miles of streams flowed through remaining streams, together with the City’s forests, New York City (NYC)’s wetlands and forests to the provide critical ecosystem services to both communities estuary that had been stewarded by the Lenape, surrounding them and the fish and wildlife they support. Rockaway, and Canarsie tribes for centuries. These Streams transport sediment and nutrients throughout streams supported diverse cold-water fisheries and the landscape, providing habitat and food for birds, fish, provided habitat, food, and clean water for fish, wildlife, eel, salamanders, dragonflies, and other wildlife. and people. Manhattan, The Bronx, and Staten Island Streams also regulate air temperatures, absorb and contained most of NYC’s freshwater streams. Fewer convey floodwaters, and provide spaces for respite, were evident in Queens and Brooklyn, likely due to education, and recreation for the communities that porous sandy soils generated from the retreat of the surround them. last glaciers and the far inland reach of tidal streams through coastal marshes of Jamaica Bay and the Long OBJECTIVES Island Sound. This project inventories and characterizes the stream Beginning in the 1600s, European colonists began resources across NYC for the first time and assesses damming streams in NYC for mills, irrigation, and the condition of those streams on NYC Parks’ property.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Advice on Eating the Fish You Catch
    Long Island MAPS INSIDE Health Advice on Eating Fish You Catch New York City 1 Why We Have Advisories Fishing is fun and fish are an important part of a healthy diet. Fish contain high quality protein, essential nutrients, healthy fish oils, and are low in saturated fat. However, some fish contain chemicals at levels that may be harmful to health. To help people make healthier choices about which fish they eat, the New York State Department of Health issues advice about eating sportfish (fish you catch). The health advice about which fish to eat depends on: Where You Fish Health Risks Fish from waters that are close to human activities and contamination sources are more likely to be The primary chemicals of concern in New York City waters and Long Island marine waters contaminated than fish from remote marine waters. are PCBs, PFAS, dioxin, and cadmium. In Long Island freshwaters the primary chemical is In the New York City/Long Island (NYC/LI) area, chlordane and PFAS. These chemicals build up in your body over time. Health problems that fish from the Long Island Sound or the ocean are less may result from chemicals in fish range from small changes in health that are hard to detect contaminated. to birth defects and cancer. Visit www.health.ny.gov/fish/additional_information.htm for more information. Who You Are Women of childbearing age (under 50) and children under 15 are advised to limit the kinds of fish they eat Tips for Healthier Eating • Bacteria, viruses, or parasites can and how often they eat them.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Zones; Coast Guard in Approximate Position 40°34′28.2′ N Captain of the Port New York Fire- 073°50′00.0′ W (NAD 1983), Off Beach Works Displays
    Coast Guard, DHS § 165.168 These personnel comprise commis- dius of the fireworks barge in approxi- sioned, warrant, and petty officers of mate position 40°30′04″ N 074°15′35″ W the Coast Guard. Upon being hailed by (NAD 1983), about 240 yards east of a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, Raritan River Cutoff Channel Buoy 2 radio, flashing light, or other means, (LLNR 36595). the operator of a vessel shall proceed (5) Coney Island Safety Zone: All wa- as directed. ters of Lower New York Bay within a (4) Vessels equal to or greater than 20 250-yard radius of the fireworks land meters (65.6 feet) in length, carrying shoot located on the south end of Stee- persons for the purpose of viewing the plechase Pier, Coney Island, in approxi- fireworks, may take position in an area mate position 40°34′11″ N 073°59′00″ W inside the safety zone, at least 200 (NAD 1983). yards off the bulkhead on the west (6) Arthur Kill, Elizabeth, New Jersey bank and just off the pierhead faces on Safety Zone: All waters of the Arthur the east bank of the East River be- Kill within a 150-yard radius of the fire- tween the Williamsburg Bridge and works land shoot located in Elizabeth, North 9th Street, Brooklyn. This area New Jersey, in approximate position is bound by the following points: 40°38′50″ N 074°10′58″ W (NAD 1983), 40°42′45.5″ N 073°58′07.4″ W; thence to about 675 yards west of Arthur Kill 40°42′50.4″ N 073°58′23.2″ W; thence to Channel Buoy 20 (LLNR 36780).
    [Show full text]