Stewart / the Levantine Review Volume 1 Number 2 (Fall 2012) 153
Stewart / The Levantine Review Volume 1 Number 2 (Fall 2012) LEBANON’S NATIONAL IDENTITY: WALKING BETWEEN RAINDROPS? Hannah Stewart* In 2006, a Byblos Bank television commercial epitomised the enduring centrality of conflict in the debate over identity in Lebanon. As the commercial unfolds, standing proudly alongside their national flags, a slew of individuals take to the stage introducing themselves as, in turn, Frenchmen, Omanis, Serbians, Americans, Colombians, Palestinians, and others, with each of their nationalities flaunted as natural a part of their being as their gender, race or name. Yet Lebanon’s Cedar flag in this clip fails to invoke such intuitive national sentiments, with the “nation” (and its name) relegated to the folds of the red white and green backdrop. As Lebanon's representatives take to the stage the tone changes, jovial music is replaced by a sombre tune, and each introduction is followed by an ominous gunshot. As their flag falls crumpled to the ground, the young Lebanese introduce themselves not according to a single nationality, but in turn as Maronites, Sunnis, Shias and Druze. Then in silent contemplation, the commercial closes with a question: “when will we all become only Lebanese?”1 As a small country with a history plagued by conflict, power struggles, eXternal interference, and the burdens of a volatile region, Lebanon seemed condemned to go on “walk[ing] between raindrops”—changing and adapting in its quest for survival, often at the cost of its own national cohesion.2 Yet, just as history has often revealed a Lebanon perennially teetering on the edge of communal violence, so did it also paint a country remarkably at peace with its diversity, advancing a splendid model of inter-communal coexistence.
[Show full text]