External Newsletter January
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
1 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction
1 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction People and things are given names for identification purposes. A name is a title given to a person or a thing. A name is defined by Sebashe (2003:12) as a word or words by which a person, animal, place or a thing is spoken of or referred to. In other words, a name distinguishes a particular thing from others. Names have political, social, economic and religious significance. As far as this study is concerned, the emphasis would be on the political significance of a name. The Black South Africans suffered a significant harm during the apartheid regime. The Europeans dominated in everything which resulted in Blacks losing their identity, culture, values, heritage an tradition. The European domination interfered with the naming patterns of the indigenous people of South Africa. Names of places were virtually Eurocentric. This is evident in town names, for example, Johannesburg, Pretoria, Pietersburg and Potgietersrus. Tables turned when a democratic government was elected in 1994. The affected people started to realize the negative impact of apartheid on numerous things, places names inclusive. The new government started to implement political changes. Some place names are changed to strike a balance between races, new places are named according to what the people want. Place naming starts to shift a distance away from Eurocentric to African names. Towns, streets, sporting facilities, names of settlements, businesses and 2 educational institutions are the most places affected by name changes and new naming patterns. 1.2 Background to the problem The problem of place naming in Africa in general and South Africa in particular started during the colonial period when many European countries scrambled for Africa in the 17th century. -
Keep the Dream196 AH 16 New Agatha Road Tzaneen Limpopo 0835 Cell 0732742080 Fax 0865609206 Email: Website
Business Plan Keep The Dream196 AH 16 New Agatha Road Tzaneen Limpopo 0835 Cell 0732742080 Fax 0865609206 Email: www.keepthedream196.com Website: www.keepthedream196.com 1 PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com I. Table of Contents II. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 3 III. General Company Description............................................................................................. 3 IV. Products and Services .......................................................................................................... 8 V. Marketing Plan ...................................................................................................................... 16 VI. Operational Plan .................................................................................................................. 25 VII. Management and Organization ....................................................................................... 30 VIII. Budget………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….32 IX. Voice of the Child………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………34 2 PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com II. Executive Summary Keep The Dream196 is a local NGO which has been operating in Greater Tzaneen Municipality for the last 11yrs working with 2,456 orphan and vulnerable children aged between 5-26yrs in 65 villages and 86 sites around Greater Tzaneen. Since our inception we have grown to include -
AN OUTCOMES EVALUATION of the Nkowankowa Demonstration Centre FRUIT PROCESSORS FACTORY in NKOWANKOWA, GREATER TZANEEN, LIMPOPO PROVINCE
An Evaluation Report Prepared for the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Sustainable Livelihoods Division, by the Human Sciences Research Council AN OUTCOMES EVALUATION OF THE Nkowankowa Demonstration Centre FRUIT PROCESSORS FACTORY IN NKOWANKOWA, GREATER TZANEEN, LIMPOPO PROVINCE An Independent Evaluation conducted by the HSRC Final Report 10 February 2017 Project Managers Dr Evans Mupela Stewart Ngandu Contact Dr Evans Mupela, Research Specialist, EPD [email protected] +27 12 302 2257 Human Sciences Research Council Acknowledgements The team wishes to express its gratitude to the Department of Science and Technology, who initiated and funded the study. In particular, warm gratitude is due to all members of the Project Steering Committee for their strategic guidance and support throughout the study period. The findings reported in this study are those of the independent evaluators and do not necessarily reflect the views of any other party. Research Team: Dr Evans Mupela; Stewart Ngandu; Khanyisa Mkhabele; Sam Hlangwane; Israel Nelwamondo; Mmantsha Seshibe; Lineo Sakoane; Samantha Senosha; Sinazo Nkosi; Maria Molokomme; Alexandra Mhula Links; and Kgabo Ramoroka i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Aim, Objectives and Evaluation question .............................................................................................. 2 1.2 Focus of the evaluation ........................................................................................................................ -
The Child Support Grant and the Fertility of Recipient Parents in Lenyenye Township
The child support grant and the fertility of recipient parents in Lenyenye Township Motheo Rabaji WITS Graduate School of Governance Thesis presented in partial fulfilment for the degree of Master of Management (in the field of Public and Development Management) to the Faculty of Commerce, Law, and Management, University of the Witwatersrand March 2016 Name of candidate Motheo Rabaji Student number 9613347p Telephone numbers 060 533 1051 Email address [email protected] Name of supervisor Dr. Kambidima Wotela ii DECLARATION I declare that this thesis/dissertation titled ‘The child support grant and the fertility of recipient parents in Lenyenye Township’ is my own, unaided work. I have acknowledged and referenced all sources that I have used and quoted. I hereby submit it in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Management (Public and Development Management) in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. I have not submitted this report before for any other degree or examination to any other institution. Motheo Rabaji Johannesburg, March 2016 iii ABSTRACT Author: Motheo Rabaji Thesis title: The child support grant and the fertility of recipient parents in Lenyenye Township Johannesburg, March 2016 The research aimed to find out whether one of the unintended outcomes of governments’ top-down implementation of the child support grant was increased fertility among recipients in the rural areas, which generally have higher levels of fertility in the country. South Africa does not have a fertility problem, but development is still much needed in the rural areas. The plight of government, having inherited one of the most unequal society is not minimised. -
Municipal Service Delivery in Greater Tzaneen Local Municipality in Limpopo Province: a Case of Lenyenye Township
MUNICIPAL SERVICE DELIVERY IN GREATER TZANEEN LOCAL MUNICIPALITY IN LIMPOPO PROVINCE: A CASE OF LENYENYE TOWNSHIP by MATLHOMOLENG HENDRICK RAOPHALA MINI-DISSERTATION Submitted in (partial) fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Qualification in Master of Public Administration in the FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT AND LAW (Turfloop graduate school of leadership) at the UNIVERSITY OF LIMPOPO Supervisor: Prof K Phago 2013 i ABSTRACT The research study attempts to understand levels of service delivery facing Lenyenye Township falling under the jurisdiction of Greater Tzaneen Local Municipal Council. The main focal point of the study is to ascertain the effectiveness of the provision of basic services such as electricity, water and roads by the Greater Tzaneen Local Municipality. This study takes into account that there are other townships such as Nkowankowa, Khutjwana and Tickeyline that are also under the jurisdiction of Greater Tzaneen Local Municipality, and therefore, the research made no attempts to compare levels of service in these towns as its main focus is Lenyenye Township. The findings of this case study are by no means a representation of the state of service delivery in the entire Greater Tzaneen Local Municipal area. The study is qualitative in nature as it attempts to understand how residents of Lenyenye Township perceive service delivery in their area. To get to the bottom of this investigation, interviews were conducted to supplement the data that is needed to make a case. The central elements of this study are community participation and financial management. According to White Paper on Local Government (1998), the above elements are the cornerstone of democracy, and that democracy should be visible and practical at grassroots. -
Greater Tzaneen Municipality FINAL IDP 2020/2021 Page 3 of 345
GREATER TZANEEN MUNICIPALITY VISION "A Green, Prosperous and United Municipality that Provides Quality Services to All” Table of Content Page MAYOR'S FOREWORD............................................ ...................................................................... 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................... ........................................................... 11 FINAL IDP 2020/2021 FINAL IDP 2020/2021Page 1 of 345 fy TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY THE MAYOR ............................................................................................................................... 8 1. PLANNING FRAMEWORK .......................................................................................................................... 10 2. MUNICIPAL PROFILE ................................................................................................................................. 26 3. SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................... 37 KPA 1: SPATIAL RATIONALE ............................................................................................................................ 37 4. KPA 2: BASIC SERVICE DELIVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES ................................. 65 5. KPA 3: LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. 108 6. KPA 4: GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ........................................................ -
Basic Design Study Report on the Project for Improvement of the Health Facilities in the Limpopo Province in the Republic of South Africa
No. BASIC DESIGN STUDY REPORT ON THE PROJECT FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE HEALTH FACILITIES IN THE LIMPOPO PROVINCE IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA AUGUST 2003 JAPAN lNTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) JOINT VENTURE BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL TOTAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION AND YAMASHITA SEKKEI INC. GR2 JR 03-212 Location Map Limpopo Polokwane Pretoria Greater Tzaneen Subdistrict Republic of South Africa Letaba Regional Mgodeni Grace Hospital Health Centre ←← To Petersburg To Kruger National Partk→ Greater Tzaneen Nkowankowa Health Centre Sub-District Office DR. CN Phatudi District Hospital Shilvana Health Centre Julesburg Health Centre 0 5 10km Greater Tzaneen Subdistrict Map Previous District Boader before Feb. 2001 Greater Giyani Project Site Sub-district Mokgwathi Clinic (15) To Giyani Morapalala Clinic (5) Greater Letaba Makgope Clinic (17) Sub-district Ooghoek Clinic (14) Madumane Clinic (4) Ramotshinyadi Clinic (16) Tzaneen Local Area Nyavana Clinic (13) Dr. Hugo Nkabinde Clinic (12) Morutji Clinic (3) Motupa Clinic (2) M ugodeni Grace Local Area 36 Mugodeni Grace Health Center Greater Tzaneen Mamitwa Clinic (11) Sub-district 529 71 71 Ba-Phalaborwa Tzaneen Clinic (1) Sub-district Van Velden Hospital Tzaneen Letaba Hospital 36 N kow ankow a Local Area Mariveni Clinic (10) Mogolobot 2 VP ▲ Nkowankowa Letsitele Clinic (6) To Polokw ane Health Center (P ietersburg) Dan Clinic (7) 528 Zangoma Clinic (22) 71 71 Khujwana Clinic (9) ▲ Khujwana VP Mohlaba Clinic (8) 529 Jamela Clinic (21) Moime Clinic (26) Lenyenye Clinic (27) Lephephane Clinic -
Eskom Letaba Heritage Maps.Pdf
Prepared for: ESKOM NORTHERN REGION A PHASE I HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY FOR ESKOM’S PROPOSED LETABA PROJECT IN THE LIMPOPO PROVINCE Prepared by: Dr Julius CC Pistorius 352 Rosemary Street Lynnwood 0081 PO Box 1522 Bela Bela 0480 Archaeologist & Heritage Consultant Member ASAPA Tel and fax 014 7362115 Cell 0825545449 [email protected] May 2012 Executive summary A Phase I Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) study as required in terms of Section 38 of the National Heritage Resources Act (Act 25 of 1999) was done for Eskom’s proposed Letaba Project in the Limpopo Province. The five components of this project which involves the construction of new power lines, substations, rebuilding of existing power lines and the construction of accompanying infrastructure are referred to as the Eskom Project whilst the footprints of these developmental components are referred to as the Eskom Project Area. It is possible that the Eskom Project may impact on some of the types and ranges of heritage resources as outlined in Section 3 (see Box 1) of the National Heritage Resources Act (No 25 of 1999). Consequently, a Phase I Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) was done for the Letaba Project. The aims with the Phase I HIA study were the following: To establish whether any of the types and ranges of heritage resources as outlined in Section 3 of the National Heritage Resources Act (No 25 of 1999) (Box 1) do occur in the Eskom Project Area and, if so, to determine the nature, the extent and the significance of these remains. To determine whether these remains will be affected by the proposed Eskom Project and, if so, to evaluate what appropriate mitigation and management measures could be taken to reduce the impact of the proposed development on these heritage resources. -
Limpopo Mpumalanga Proposed Main Seat / Sub District Within The
!C !C^ !.C !C ^!C ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^!C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C^ !C !. !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ ^ !C !C !. !C !C ^!C !C ^ !C !C ^ !C !C ^ ^!C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C !.^ !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !. !C !C !C !C !C !C!. ^ ^ ^ !C !. !C^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C!C !. !C !C !C ^ !C !. !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C LLeennyyeennyyee SSuubb DDiissttrriicctt ooff TTzzaanneeeenn MMaaggiisstteerriiaall DDiissttrriicctt !C !.^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !Cñ LETSITELE ^$ le Ba-Phalaborwa NU Ba-Phalaborwa NU ^ !C SUMMER HILL TARANTAL LEOBI SIVURAHLI Nkowakowa1 LANGUEDOC THE NECK olat MALATI Humulani SILONQUE 582 578 574 560 Mariveni Letsite!Cle Letsitele 563 565 M SOLOMONS 764 Murchison Ba-Phalaborwa NU 23 KaMayomela RUBBERVALE MON MINE Majeje CELHARD Mokgolobotho Shihungu VORSTER Ben Farm Ba-Phalaborwa BASSAN TAMARA MASIMU Dan 762 Lulekani 20 Ba-Phalaborwa 784 DESIR Mulati 922 Ben B Ext 2 BEN LAASTE !C!. -
Greater Tzaneen Municipality Greenest Municipality Winner
Greater Tzaneen Municipality Greenest Municipality winner 1 CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background 2. Spatial Development Framework 3. Waste Management 4. Landscaping ,Tree planting and Beautification 5. Energy Efficiency and Conservation 6. Water Management 7. Public Participation and Community Empowerment 8. Education and Awareness 9. Conclusion 2 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND • Government as a Champion of sustainable development is also a signatory to conventions and treaties which promotes sustainable development and environmental conservation. • As mandated by the Constitution:- Local Government must promote a safe and healthy environment To promote a safe and healthy environment Greater Tzaneen Municipality employ various environmental tools to achieve it 3 • G.T.M.`s participation in the G.M.C. serves as a TOOL to determine progress in delivering on this mandate. It also assist in delivering on this mandate • GTM have won 2012/2013 District and Provincial • We won 2013/2014 National Competition • We further won the 2014/2015 District and Provincial Competition. • Awaiting 2015/2016 District results 4 BACKGROUND The SDF was first approved/ adopted by the municipality in 2005. Current document has been reviewed in 2008 as adopted by Council as required by the applicable legislation. Upon the promulgation of SPLUMA as new planning legislation the current SDF needed to be reviewed to comply- process underway. The impact of SPLUMA to the Municipalities with regards development application and decision making. Formulation of border to border land use schemes. • Economy- hindrances arising from: • Restitution • Land ownership • Insufficient bulk infrastructure • Land-use management (legislations framework) • Spatial challenges (dispersed settlements) • Topography/ environmental sensitivity • Disparities urban and rural • Backlog on housing infrastructure • Informal settlements/tenure security • High unemployment Waste Management 1. -
Database Column Report
Page: 1 GROOT LETABA RIVER WATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (GLeWaP): STAKEHOLDER DATABASE – COLUMN REPORT Name: Company City Muller, Willie A M Muller en Seuns LETSITELE Muhlongo, Mhlavasi Abbie Farm (Nwatsuvula) NWAMITWA Ndhlovu, Abbie Abbie Farm (Nwatsuvula) NWAMITWA Ndhlovu, Johannes Abbie Farm (Nwatsuvula) NWAMITWA Ndhlovu, July Abbie Farm (Nwatsuvula) NWAMITWA Ndhlovu, Rosie Abbie Farm (Nwatsuvula) NWAMITWA Maluleke, S. African Farmers Union TZANEEN Rapitsi , David African National Congress NWAMITWA Mothiba, Moshala African National Congress POLOKWANE Ramalepe, Shadrack African National Congress (ANC) NAMAKGALE Strydom, Melissa Agri Letaba TZANEEN Taylor, Ingrid Agri Letaba TZANEEN van Rooyen, Louis Agri Letaba - Letaba Water Users Association LETSITELE Long, Tony Agri Letaba/ Agri Limpopo TZANEEN Prinsloo, Elna Agri Limpopo - Loskop LADANNA Booysen, Werner Agri Limpopo: ZZ2 FAUNA PARK Stapylton, C. Agri North TZANEEN Opperman, Nic Agri SA PRETORIA van der Merwe, Hans Agri SA PRETORIA van Zyl, Phille Agri SA Commodity Chamber MOOKETSI van Wyk, Riaan Agri SA Gauteng BIRCHLEIGH Rall, Gert Agri SA Limpopo (Morgenzon, Leeukuil) POLOKWANE Botha, Ilze Agri SA Magazine PRETORIA van Rooyen, Johan Agricultural Business Chamber (ABC) PRETORIA Taunyane, Tumi Agricultural News PRETORIA Moephuli, Shadrack Agricultural Research Council PRETORIA Mpandeli, Sylvester Agricultural Research Council PRETORIA Shaker, Massoud Agricultural Research Council SILVERTON Barnard, Robin Agriculture Research Council PRETORIA Bloem, Pierre AgriSpectrum POLOKWANE Liebenberg-Enslin, -
2003/4-Mopani District Municipality Integrated Development Plan
2003/4-MOPANI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN Prepared and adopted by the Mopani District Council in July 2004 on behalf of the people of this district This IDP is not a plan listing a set of static plans and programmes – dreams and wishes that may never be realised! It is a call to action – spelling out what needs to be done and who will do it! Join us in the journey of development! FOREWORD During the 2001/2002 Financial Year the Mopani District Municipality produced a five- year Integrated Development Plan (IDP) to guide development in the district. This plan is applicable at least for the tenure of the existing elected Council of the municipality and is subject to annual monitoring and review. The Mopani District Municipality presents its reviewed IDP to guide development during the 2004/2005 Financial Year. As a blueprint for development, the IDP informs the municipal budget, infrastructure investment and human resource deployment to ensure sustainable development in the municipal area. As the district Council, we use the IDP as a tool to eradicate the developmental legacy of the past through the restructuring of our municipality, promotion of social equality, creation of wealth and fighting poverty, and enabling inter and intra-governmental co-operation. The IDP process has enabled the district authority to appraise the current situation in the district municipal area, assess the community and stakeholder needs, establish public participation in development, prioritise the needs, implement programmes to achieve objectives and measure its performance. The key developmental challenges that we are faced with as the district are, among others, service backlogs, institutional under- development, racial and spatial disintegration, lack of socio-economic development, inadequate and decaying infrastructure, incapacitated local leadership and financial stress to meet all the developmental needs of the municipality.