DOCSLIB.ORG

Mosk: Later That Day

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mosk: Later That Day MOSK: LATER THAT DAY There’s a whole other show waiting. Today, Jeff Gamet joins us to Tuesday, August 28, 2012 Tuesday, discuss all the Apple news that’s fit to pretend- print. Cross-Platform Zero-Day Vulnerability Found for Java 7; Affects Windows, Linux and OS X Tap If you’ve got Java 7 installed on your computer you seem to have a Here to serious security risk on your hands. Infoworld says “hackers are Listen! exploiting a zero-day vulnerability in Java 7,” one that “can be exploited through any browser running on any operating system, from Windows and Linux to OS X, that has Java installed...” According to the piece, "the vulnerability is not in Java 6, it's in new functionality in Java 7." While Apple stopped bundling Java in OS X with last year’s Lion release, the piece says users can and do install it on their own when they encounter a site that employs a Java applet. So far all of the known exploits in the wild have targeted Windows machines, though the piece says there’s nothing to stop an exploit aimed at the Mac. Security experts recommend disabling Java until Oracle delivers a patch. Java can be disabled on a Mac in the preferences of your chosen browser or browsers... and thanks to Information Security pro George Starcher for sending me this story... and freaking me the freak out. 1 The Apple v. Samsung Aftermath Continues Samsung Bashes Apple for Litigiousness Post Apple v. Samsung v. Apple Verdict August 28, 2012 Since the Apple v. Samsung v. Apple verdict, the one in the middle - Samsung - has had a chance to pull itself together, and seems to have passed on that chance. LATER THAT DAY DAY THAT LATER Having run the internal memo Apple CEO Tim Cook sent post verdict, 9 to 5 Mac felt it was only fair to do the same MOSK: for Sammy. Google Issues Statement Defending In it the company says it tired to work Itself, Bashing Apple and Leaving out a deal with Apple, “However, Apple Samsung Hanging Out to Dry pressed on with a lawsuit, and we,” says Samsung, “have had little choice but to The founder of the Android feast has counter-sue, so that we can protect our also issued a statement, though it company.” doesn’t seem to have said much. And the road is long, with plenty of The Mac Observer has Google saying: other legal procedures ahead. Now, back The court of appeals will review both to bashing Apple. Skipping further down infringement and the validity of the the page: patent claims. Most of these don’t relate to the core Android operating system, History has shown there has yet to be a and several are being re-examined by company that has won the hearts and the US Patent Office. The mobile minds of consumers and achieved industry is moving fast and all players — continuous growth, when its primary including newcomers — are building means to competition has been the upon ideas that have been around for outright abuse of patent law, not the decades. We work with our partners to pursuit of innovation. give consumers innovative and affordable products, and we don’t want We trust that the consumers and the anything to limit that. market will side with those who prioritize innovation over litigation, and Can I attempt a translation? The Apple we will prove this beyond doubt. patents may not hold up, there’s nothing new under the sun, and if anything did Did Samsung hear about the Samsung violate Apple’s patents it wasn’t Android memo presented at the trial wherein but something done to Android by our Samsung execs said their stuff would be partner, who’s back we have. To an better if it was more like Apple’s? extent. Just wondering. 2 Samsung Seeks to Have Galaxy Tab Droid Charge and the Galaxy Prevail 10.1 Temporary Injunction should all be subject to a ban. Why they Dissolved; May Seek Damages Due want to press that many is beyond me, to Sales Block though, since the piece says most of those phones are outdated. The Galaxy With an eye on legal procedures ahead, S II was last year, Sammy’s up to the August 28, 2012 it kind of looks like Samsung may have Galaxy S III now. Other phones on the at least a partial win locked up already. list are even older than the various Galaxy S IIs, though the piece says The jury in the San Jose case ruled last they are still on sale. Friday that Samsung did not violate Apple’s iPad design patent with its Stocks Shift in Wake of Verdict LATER THAT DAY THAT LATER Galaxy Tab 10.1, which may create a bit of an issue for Apple. The Verge points With a Billion-plus-dollar verdict out out that the Cupertino-company filed for there, its not surprising that investors and received a preliminary injunction were moving money around as well. MOSK: against sales of the device in late June, CNET says, “shares of Samsung based on the idea that the Samsung Electronics registered their greatest tablet borrowed too much of the look one-day price drop in nearly five years and feel of the iPad. With the jury now in their first day of trading after Apple's saying that that was not the case, patent award against the Korean Samsung would like to see that electronics giant.” injunction dissolved, and by the way could we discuss damages caused by Forgive me but that seems goofy. Apple not being able to sell the thing for a is only now going after injunctions couple of months? against allegedly infringing products, so everything Samsung had to sell last According to The Verge, Samsung is Friday it still had to sell yesterday. And “asking that the court hold on to the besides, Samsung has a boatload of $2.6 million bond Apple paid to secure businesses besides mobile devices. the injunction until a damages hearing Take, for example, the $7.5 billion Apple can be held.” will spend on components with Samsung this year alone. And Apple’s Apple Seeks Ban on Eight Samsung not the only company buying Phones Based on San Jose Court components from Samsung. Win I understand wanting to get off of a Apple, meanwhile, has legal procedures sinking ship, but I don’t think that ship of its own ahead. Business Insider says is sinking. It may simply need to adjust “Apple has listed the eight Samsung its course. phones it wants to ban as a result of its victory in court last week.” Meanwhile Apple opened up two- percentage points according to a Based on the jury’s ruling, Apple separate CNET piece, and it only kept believes the Galaxy S II 4G, the Galaxy going from there. Shares of the all- S II (AT&T variant), the Galaxy S II things-iMaker closed at $675.68. For Skyrocket, the Galaxy S II (T-Mobile those of you keeping score at home, Variant), the Galaxy S II Epic 4G (Sprint that’s another all-time closing record for 3 Variant), the Galaxy S Showcase, the the company. Nokia and RIM See Share Price Bump We think it will be important for Apple not Thanks to Investor Worries Over to appear to be a bully to consumers. We Android would not be surprised to see the press take the view that the verdict lessens It wasn’t just Apple and Samsung that competition, and that Apple will need to saw their needles move. All Things D says promote the view that Apple was just shares of Nokia were up nearly 9% at the August 28, 2012 protecting its innovation and IP. start of trading on Monday, though they ended the day up only 5-and-a-half- Seeing it from the flip-side, Topeka percent. Capital’s Brian White who says in his Nokia, as you likely remember, has gone note: “all-in” with Microsoft’s Windows Phone "We believe this verdict enhances the LATER THAT DAY THAT LATER operating system. All Things D says Apple brand as 'the innovator' in the “Trouble for Samsung could be indicative smartphone and tablet markets at the of a larger problem for Android, so expense of Samsung Electronics that manufacturers of rival smartphone MOSK: some will now view as the 'imitator', platforms may end up benefiting.” In fact, while also providing a strong disincentive even Research In Motion managed to for future 'copying' of Apple products...” catch a little good news from Samsung’s bad news. RIM shares closed up nearly Fortune actually had notes from a few 2%. analysts. May I pause again to say how goofy that last bit seems? There may be a slight Well, as a matter of fact, I’d love to lay a stink on Samsung right now, but there’s a few of them out for you. dead-fish and cigar smoke stink on RIMM. If you’re in Samsung, familiarize yourself Barclays Capital analyst Ben Reitzes: with the location of all emergency exits but for heaven’s sake, don’t jump out at "While we realize the verdict will be 20,000 feet. appealed, we believe the ruling marks an important victory for Apple against That said, you should not take financial Android. Competitors may now think advice from me. Really. The one piece of twice about how they compete in smart financial advice you should take from me, mobility devices with the industry's clear do not take financial advice from me.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Secrets at Apple's Core [Entire Talk]
    Stanford eCorner Secrets at Apple's Core [Entire Talk] Adam Lashinsky, Author May 23, 2012 Video URL: http://ecorner.stanford.edu/videos/2973/Secrets-at-Apples-Core-Entire-Talk Adam Lashinsky, Fortune senior editor-at-large, shares an insider look at Apple, one of the world's most iconic and secretive companies. Based on his research into the technology giant's internal processes and approaches to leadership and building products, Lashinsky offers insights and surprises from his book, Inside Apple: How America's Most Admired--and Secretive-- Company Really Works. Transcript Almost exactly a year-ago this week I published an article in Fortune magazine with the same title as you see in front of you, Inside Apple. We decided at Fortune that in Apple we had a company that the entire world thought they knew a lot about because the world knew about Apple's products. And they knew about Apple's advertising and its image and its brand and its logo and so on. When in fact the world knew and really still does know very little about how Apple does what it does, what goes on inside Apple? There is a reason for that and it's a major part of my thesis and what I've learned in researching this company intensely over the last year and that is that Apple doesn't want us to know what goes on inside Apple. Apple is professionally focused on telling us, telling you about its products. Not about it. As a business journalist, my job is not to be concerned with what Apple is interested in us knowing, but what my readers at Fortune magazine ought to know and want to know.
    [Show full text]
  • 300Tage Tim Cook
    300 Tage Tim Cook Wie führt er Apple? Tim Cook führt Apple bei Redaktionsschluss seit 300 Tagen. Erste eigene Schritte hat Cook an der Spitze des desig- nverliebten Unternehmens mit den kühnen Produktvisionen absolviert, sein eigenes Profil hat er noch nicht gefunden. Dirk Kunde Tim Cook stellt die dritte Generation des iPad im Yerba Buena Center in San Francisco vor. FOTO: Getty Images / Kevork Djansezian Redaktionelles News & Trends Headliner Testlabor Mac Help Mac Life 109 ungenannter Branchenexperte in einem der wenigen Artikel, die man über Cook in US-Archiven findet. Die Summe ist natürlich zu hoch gegriffen, doch so ein Gerät unter 1.000 Dollar anbieten zu können, ist eine Meisterleistung. Genau für diese Aufgabe wirbt ihn Jobs im Frühjahr 1998 bei Compaq ab. Zu diesem Zeit- punkt betreibt Apple eigene Fabriken. Cook senkt die Zahl der Zulieferer von mehreren Hundert auf 24. Für Produkte wie Drucker oder den Newton kommt das as hat selbst Steve Aus. Neun von zehn Lagerhäuser werden geschlos- Jobs beeindruckt. Der sen. Bis dahin stehen für zwei Monate fertige Pro- sonst so ruhige und dukte in den Regalen. Cook senkt das auf zwei Tage. stille Tim Cook stei- Der Schnitt entschlackt die Bilanz um 500 Millionen gert sich in einer Tele- US-Dollar, denn Inventar ist totes Kapital. Just-In-Time- fonkonferenz in ein Produktion ist das Schlagwort Ende der 90er Jahre und minutenlanges Apple- somit ist die Auslagerung nach Asien unausweichlich. Glaubensbekenntnis. Jobs will Kontrolle über die Produkte von der Entwick- Es fallen Sätze wie lung bis zum Verkauf, und so treibt Cook den Aufbau D „Wir sind auf der Erde, eigener Läden voran.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Inc. This Article Is About the Technology Company
    Apple Inc. This article is about the technology company. For other companies named "Apple", see Apple (disambiguation). Apple Inc. Type Public Traded as NASDAQ: AAPL NASDAQ-100 Component S&P 500 Component Industry Computer hardware Computer software Consumer electronics Digital distribution Founded April 1, 1976 (incorporated January 3, 1977 as Apple Computer, Inc.) Founder(s) Steve Jobs Steve Wozniak Ronald Wayne[1] Headquarters Apple Campus, 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, California, U.S. Number of 357 retail stores(as of October 2011) locations Area served Worldwide Key people Tim Cook (CEO) Arthur Levinson (Chairman)[2] Sir Jonathan Ive (SVP, Industrial Design) Steve Jobs (Chairman, 1976-1985/2011; CEO, 1997– 2011) Products Products list[show] Services Services list[show] [3] Revenue US$ 108.249 billion (FY 2011) [3] Operating income US$ 33.790 billion (FY 2011) [3] Profit US$ 25.922 billion (FY 2011) [3] Total assets US$ 116.371 billion (FY 2011) [3] Total equity US$ 76.615 billion (FY 2011) Employees 60,400 (2011)[4] Subsidiaries Braeburn Capital FileMaker Inc. Anobit Website Apple.com Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL ; formerly Apple Computer, Inc.) is an American multinational corporation that designs and sellsconsumer electronics, computer software, and personal computers. The company's best-known hardware products are the Macintoshline of computers, the iPod, the iPhone and the iPad. Its software includes the Mac OS X operating system; the iTunes media browser; the iLife suite of multimedia and creativity software; the iWork suite of productivity software; Aperture, a professional photography package; Final Cut Studio, a suite of professional audio and film-industry software products; Logic Studio, a suite of music production tools; the Safari web browser; and iOS, a mobile operating system.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple 1 Crisis Communication Plan #2: Technical-Error Harm Purpose
    Crisis Communication Plan #2: Technical-Error Harm Purpose: In the event that iTunes user accounts and the servers are hacked, we must take immediate action to respond and inform all our publics of the situation. We will provide systematic tips and preventative measures to ensure other user accounts are not hacked or fraudulent use of a user account occurs. Apple’s focus is to respond to this crisis through ensuring all parties have the most available information. This will allow information to be communicated consistently, openly, and accurately to all parties. The resolution to the crisis can be obtained through an efficient and quick response, leading to open communication with all parties at all times. This path will allow all communication barriers to cease and stop any other problems at the source. Objectives: 1. Assess the crisis situation: a. Locate source of problem. 2. Assemble the CMT (Crisis Management Team) as outlined in the staff directory. 3. Setup Crisis Control Center and start preparation of all-important materials needed for the response. 4. CMT will take the assessments and data gathered to determine the appropriate strategies to respond to the situation. 5. CMT Lead will assign and implement the use of the Methods of Communication Chart to the appropriate key publics. 6. CMT Lead will need to be the first to be notified of the situation. CMT will refer to List of key publics to know who takes priority to contact from first to last. 7. Have a data and system analyst collect all available data from the network and all other available resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Inc. (AAPL) Resuming Coverage with CL-Buy: Platform Opportunity
    December 12, 2010 ACTION Buy Apple Inc. (AAPL) Return Potential: 34% Equity Research Resuming coverage with CL-Buy: platform opportunity still nascent Source of opportunity Investment Profile We are resuming coverage of Apple with a Buy rating and 12-month target Low High price of $430 and placing it on our Americas Conviction List. We believe Growth Growth Apple’s platform-centric business model is the secret sauce that has Returns * Returns * Multiple Multiple enabled it to quickly capture market share in new computing segments Volatility Volatility while simultaneously enjoying considerable margin leverage. Percentile 20th 40th 60th 80th 100th Furthermore, we believe significant growth and profit opportunities for Apple Inc. (AAPL) this platform still lie ahead. As a result, we expect revenue and earnings Americas Technology Peer Group Average * Returns = Return on Capital For a complete description of the expectations to continue to trend upward, and we view the shares as investment profile measures please refer to attractive at current levels. the disclosure section of this document. Catalyst Key data Current Price ($) 320.56 Apple’s recent gross margin trends and guidance have caused some 12 month price target ($) 430.00 concerns among the investing community. Our analysis of Apple’s Market cap ($ mn) 293,623.4 platform history not only suggests that this gross margin erosion is 9/10 9/11E 9/12E 9/13E normal, but also that we have probably already seen the worst of it. Revenue ($ mn) New 65,225.1 91,807.0 110,772.6 122,389.7 Indeed, we believe Apple’s margins have already bottomed, and we expect Revenue ($ mn) Old-------- EPS ($) New 15.15 19.86 24.91 28.29 the company to resume its leverage-driven upside in coming quarters.
    [Show full text]
  • You Can't Innovate Like Apple — Pragmatic Marketing, World's Most Popular Produc
    You Can't Innovate Like Apple — Pragmatic Marketing, world's most popular produc ... Page 1 of 11 You Can't Innovate Like Apple When what you teach and develop every day has the title “Innovation” attached to it, you reach a point where you tire of hearing about Apple. Without question, nearly everyone believes the equation Apple = Innovation is a fundamental truth. Discover what makes them different. By Alain Breillatt Note: Experience tells me I must start with the disclaimer that I admire Apple, but I am not a Macaholic or a Windows Geek. I don’t care who has the better OS—except to the extent that it provides examples for successful or poor innovation. Apple! Apple! Apple! Magazines can’t possibly be wrong, so Apple is clearly the “Most Admired,” the “Most Innovative," and the “Master at Design.”(1, 2, 3, 4, 5) Let me tell you, when what you teach and develop every day has the title “Innovation” attached to it, you reach a point where you tire of hearing about Apple. Without question, nearly everyone believes the equation Apple = Innovation is a fundamental truth—akin to the second law of thermodynamics, Boyle’s Law, or Moore’s Law. But ask these same people if they understand exactly how Apple comes up with their ideas and what approach the company uses to develop blockbuster products—whether it is a fluky phenomenon or based on a repeatable set of governing principles—and you mostly get a dumbfounded stare. This response is what frustrates me most, because people worship what they don’t understand.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History of Kenneth Kocienda and Richard Williamson, Part 2
    Oral History of Kenneth Kocienda and Richard Williamson, part 2 Interviewed by: Hansen Hsu Marc Weber Recorded November 13, 2017 Mountain View, CA CHM Reference number: X8367.2018 © 2017 Computer History Museum Oral History of Kenneth Kocienda and Richard Williamson, part 2 Hsu: All right, it is November 13th. I am Hansen Hsu with Marc Weber. And we are here with Ken Kocienda and Richard Williamson, again, for part two. So, let’s get back to where we were and start where we left off. So, we were talking about sort of working on iPhone 1.0. And one thing that I didn’t get to ask is what was sort of the experience like of being on that team and working in secret and the long hours and that general sort of the feeling or the life of working on that project. Williamson: Do you want to go first? Kocienda: Sure, I’ll go first. It was intense. There was a lot of pressure. It was fun because we had something that, from the very beginning, seemed like it could really be big, important for the company. I don’t know [that I] quite thought that it would be important for the world, but important for the world of technology, I think. Williamson: And important for humanity. You don’t have to be modest. Kocienda: Yeah, it is important for humanity. Well, I think we hoped that it might be. And the people were just terrific. It was very inspiring all the time to be surrounded by people who were so smart and so good at making the software that we were trying to make.
    [Show full text]
  • The Innovative Success That Is Apple, Inc. 1
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 1-1-2012 The nnoI vative Success that is Apple, Inc. Katherine Johnson [email protected] Yang Li [email protected] Hang Phan [email protected] Jason Singer Hoang Trinh [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Advertising and Promotion Management Commons, Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Marketing Commons, and the Technology and Innovation Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Katherine; Li, Yang; Phan, Hang; Singer, Jason; and Trinh, Hoang, "The nnoI vative Success that is Apple, Inc." (2012). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 418. This Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Innovative Success that is Apple, Inc. 1 The Innovative Success that is Apple, Inc. Katherine Johnson Yang Li Hang Phan Jason Singer Hoang Trinh Introduction- The Birth of a Brain Child Apple, Inc. started out as an idea of one man. This man was Steve Jobs. Jobs and his friend, Steve Wozniak, were two high school drop outs living in the Silicon Valley with extremely innovative and intelligent minds (Santa Clara Historical Society, 2012). The pair teamed up, while working for Hewlett Packard, to start Apple, Inc. from the basement of Jobs’ home (Santa Clara Historical Society, 2012). The pair created the first Apple computer on April 1, 1976 (Santa Clara Historical Society, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • SSMUG August 2013 Newsletter
    August 2013 Notable features: Calendar is now location, travel time, weather aware and adds local weather and Meeting Notice travel time directly to calendar events. Safari is All meetings, except for the December, will be at the much faster and comes with some handy sidebar Grande Prairie Library at 3479 W 183rd St., Hazel improvements to Bookmarks, Reading Lists and Crest. The December meeting will be held at the Shared Links. A new dedicated Maps application Homewood Public Library. features bookmarks, real-time traf!c and one-click send to iOS. A surprising omission is full Siri Meetings are held at the Flossmoor Station Brew support. Pub on the second Tuesday of the month at 7:30 PM. iOS 7 Walter Palmer, Editor The most anticipated software announcement was iOS 7, the next major release of the OS that powers the iPhone and iPad. New features include Control Center, iTunes Radio, AirDrop and major updates $95 billion (editorial) to Noti!cation Center, Multitasking, Siri, Camera, Photos and Safari. Like Mavericks, iOS got the "at Companies have been suing Apple right and left, treatment, but even more dramatically. The entire countries are reviewing how much Apple pays in OS has a more subdued and subtle look and feel taxes. My advice is that they make large donations and all of the Apple icons are simpler and cleaner. to charity or they will loose more then the any donation to charity to all kinds of people. Notable features: Control Center provides a slide up tray with quick access to AirPort, Bluetooth, brightness, music, AirDrop, AirPlay and a welcome World Wide Developer’s Conference 2013 built-in "ashlight.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Short-Sell Pitch
    APPLE SHORT-SELL PITCH Apple, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) Equity Analysts: Ashkon Farhangi, Armaan Ali, Katherine McMullen, Paolo McCarty, Sabeek Pradhan Associate: Saam Motamedi Company & Industry Overview Apple Inc. manufactures, and markets Ticker WBMD mobile communication and media devices, Current Price 595.32 personal computers, and portable digital Ticker HPQ (NYSE) music players. Its products and services Market Cap 559B include iPhone, iPad, Mac, iPod, Apple 52-Week 363.32-705.07 TV, the iOS and Mac OS X operating Current Price 27.29 systems, iCloud, and various accessory Range and support offerings, as well as a range MarketAvg Cap Daily $54.0718.38M B of consumer and professional software Volume applications. 52-WeekDividend $21.50-- – Range 49.39 Current Price: 595.32 Industry: Personal Computers Target Price: ? AvgCompetitors: Daily 11,294,845 Volume Personal Computers: IBM, Dell, HP Dividend 0.48 (1.70%) Smartphones: Google, Microsoft, Samsung Institutional OwnershipSoftware: Microsoft 71.5% Tablets: Amazon, Microsoft, Google Historical Stock Performance Ticker HPQ (NYSE) -After a marked decline in September 2008, Apple’s stock gradually rose until a sharp increase in 2012. -Apple stock has fallen from its 2012 peak. Recent Company History • October 18, 2011: Q1 2012 Guidance above Analysts’ Estimates • January 24, 2012: Q2 2012 Guidance Above Analysts Estimates • February 29, 2012: Market Cap tops $500 Billion • March 7, 2012: Apple unveils new HD iPad • March 15, 2012: Apple Stock tops $600 • April 24, 2012: Q3 2012 Guidance Below
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS ENTREPRENEURSHIP GO GO GO LOCAL Author: Karl Appel Faculty Mentor: Professor Ken Williams SWIFT THRIFT Author: Meredith Baade Faculty Mentor: Professor Ken Williams THE GOTTA GO BUTTON: A NEW WAY TO TRAIN YOUR DOG Author: Chad Bingo Faculty Mentor: Professor Ken Williams TOFF Author: Vincent Crocitto Faculty Mentor: Professor Ken Williams ECONOMICS THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT: NOT SO AFFORDABLE Authors: Audrey Sabatini, Jordyn Torchia Faculty Mentor: Dr. Ashley Provencher THE ARRA AND THE RECOVERY OF THE US ECONOMY Author: Joseph Abed El Latif Faculty Mentor: Dr. Martha Olney DOES MONEY AFFECT THE OUTCOME OF ELECTIONS? Author: James Pepe Faculty Mentor: Dr. Scott Trees GLOBAL LITERACY RATES AND INTERNET USAGE: AN ECONOMY ANALYSIS AND WHY IT MATTERS Author: Meredith Baade Faculty Mentor: Dr. Scott Trees IMPACT OF THE GREAT RECESSION ON THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA: A STUDY OF THE FINANCIAL EFFECTS Authors: Mayowa Adelugba, Oderah Anosike, William Ryan, Mehvish Bhatti Faculty Mentor: Dr. Arindam Mandal 8th Annual Siena College Student Conference in Business April 19, 2013 FINANCE STOCK PICKING STRATEGIES ON A SMALL-CAP STOCK Author: Kyle Brownell Faculty Mentor: Dr. Tina Sun GOOGLE’S IPO – A MODIFIED DUTCH AUCTION Author: Richmond Kwame Amponsah Faculty Mentor: Dr. Jenny Zhao MARKETING THAT’S A TECHNICAL FOUL! SPORTS FAN IDENTIFICATION AND BUYER BEHAVIOR OF COUNTERFEIT SPORTS MERCHANDISE Author: Christopher T. Weaver Faculty Mentor: Dr. Cheryl L. Buff PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION OF CONSUMER SELF-HANDICAPPING IN PURCHASE DECISIONS Author: Nicholas R. Stark Faculty Mentor: Dr. Raj Devasagayam FROM FACEBOOK TO FEARFUL: PROPOSING A SCALE TO MEASURE THE FEAR OF MISSING OUT Author: Jessica P.
    [Show full text]