DOCSLIB.ORG

Transit!&!Peering!Services!(TPS)!Report NNIIX$Market$Ecosystem$(244$Networks)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transit!&!Peering!Services!(TPS)!Report NNIIX$Market$Ecosystem$(244$Networks) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Transit!&!Peering!Services!(TPS)!Report NNIIX$Market$Ecosystem$(244$networks) NetworkName Website ASN DE>CIX!New!York NYIIX Equinix!New!York CoreSite!>!Any2!New!York BigApe NYCX AMS>IX!NY Telx!New!York 1&1$Internet http://www.1and1.com 8560 O 24Shells$Inc http://www.24shells.net 55081 O O Access$InteGrated$TechnoloGIes$(Ezzi.net) http://www.ezzi.net 15149 O Ace$Data$Centers$Inc. http://acedatacenters.com/ 11798 O O Adams$CATV$Inc. http://www.adamscable.com 14928 O Akamai$TechnoloGIes http://www.akamai.com/ 20940 O O O O AlcatelQLucent$IP$Labs 38016 O Alentus$Europe$LImIted 21321 O Amazon.com http://www.amazon.com 16509 O O O AMSQIX$Route$Servers$USA http://https://nynj.amsQIx.net/ 62972 O ANEXIA http://www.anexIaQIt.com 42473 S Apple$Inc http://www.apple.com 714 S S AppNexus$Inc. http://www.appnexus.com 29990 S Atlantic$Metro$CommunIcations http://www.atlanticmetro.net/ 29838 O O O O Automattic$Inc$(WordPress.com) http://https://automattic.com 2635 O Bat$Blue$Networks http://www.batblue.com 25885 S S BeanfIeld$Metroconnect$Inc. http://www.beanfIeld.com 21949 O O O Bell$AlIant$Inc. http://www.bellalIant.ca 855 S Bell$Canada$Backbone http://www.bell.ca 577 x x Bharti$AIrtel$LImIted http://www.airtel.In 9498 S S BICS http://www.bIcs.com/ 6774 S Black$Oak$Computers$(Northeast) 13926 O O BlInkMind$Inc. http://www.blInkmInd.com 40739 O BlIp$Networks$Inc. http://blIp.tv 18559 S S S BroadbandONE$(formerly$WV$FIber) http://www.bboI.net 19151 S S S BroadvIew$Networks http://www.broadvIewnet.com 14989 S BT http://www.bt.net 5400 x BurstNET$TechnoloGIes$Inc. http://www.burst.net/ 21788 O Calyx$Institute http://https://www.calyxInstitute.orG 4224 O CANARIE$Inc http://www.canarIe.ca 6509 S CBS http://www.cbscorporation.com 6102 O CDNetworks$Inc. http://www.cdnetworks.com 36408 O CentrILoGIc http://http;//www.centrIloGIc.com 19693 S Choopa$LLC http://www.choopa.com/ 20473 S ChunGhwa$Telecom http://www.cht.com.tw 9505 O CloudFlare http://www.cloudflare.com 13335 O O Collective$Inc http://www.collective.com 54998 S CommercIal$Network$ServIces http://www.CommercIalNetworkServIces.com 29697 O O Confluence$Networks http://confluenceQnetworks.com/ 40034 O Continent$8$TechnoloGIes$plc http://www.continent8.com 14537 O O CoreQBackbone$GmbH http://www.coreQbackbone.com 33891 S S Covad$CommunIcations$Co. http://www.covad.com 18566 S cPanel$Inc. http://www.cpanel.net 33522 O CRITEO$(USA) http://www.crIteo.com/ 19750 S S CWI$CarIbbean$LImIted http://www.lIme.com 393223 O Dailymotion http://www.dailymotion.com 41690 O Data$Network$Solutions http://www.dnetworksolution.com 31950 O O Datagram http://www.datagram.com 26163 O Datahop$Ltd http://www.datahop.net 6908 S DataPIpe http://www.datapIpe.com 14492 O O DEQCIX$NYC http://nyc.deQcIx.net/ 63034 O Decknet 29152 O Default$Route$LLC http://www.defaultroute.com 13722 O Dell$Services http://www.dell.com/servIces 10848 O O DIGItal$provIders http://www.dIGItalprovIders.net 32903 O DIGItal$West$Networks$Inc. http://www.dIGItalwest.net/ 14589 O DSCI http://www.dscIcorp.com 33748 S Dstillery$/$MedIa6DeGrees$Inc. http://medIa6deGrees.com/ 1422 S DynamIc$Network$ServIces$Inc. http://dyn.com 33517 S EastlInk http://www.eastlInk.ca 11260 S Easynet$Global$ServIces http://www.easynet.com/ 4589 S ECRITEL http://www.ecrItel.net 8304 O EdGeCast$Networks$Inc. http://www.edGecast.com 15133 O O ElIsa$Corporation$/$Saunalahti$Group http://www.elIsa.com 6667 S Embratel http://www.embratel.net.br 4230 S S EmIrates$TelecommunIcations$Corporation$(Etisalat) http://www.emIx.ae/ 8966 O EquInIx$Corp$Network http://www.equInIx.com 14609 O EquInIx$ExchanGe$MLPE http://https://Ix.equInIx.com/ 24115 O Equinix$UK http://www.equInIx.com 21371 S ExponentialQe$Ltd http://www.exponentialQe.com 25180 S S Eze$Castle$InteGration$(ECINET) http://www.ecI.com/about/Index.php 14717 O Facebook http://https://www.facebook.com/ 32934 S S FIrstLIGht$FIber http://www.fIrstlIGht.net 13536 O O FORTRESSITX http://https://www.fortressItx.com/ 25653 S S FPL$FIberNet$LLC http://www.fplfIbernet.com 33132 O Free$SAS http://www.free.fr/ 12322 S Frontier$Networks http://frontiernetworks.ca 7311 O O FusIon$TradInG$Solutions http://www.fusIonts.com/ 393316 O Gaikai$Inc$(PlayStation$Now) http://www.Gaikai.com 33353 S Global$Cloud$XchanGe$(f.k.a.$FLAG$Telecom) http://www.GlobalcloudxchanGe.com/ 15412 x Global$NAPS$GNAPS http://www.Gnaps.net/ 1784 O Globecomm$Europe http://www.GlobecommQeurope.com 24753 O GlobeNet http://www.Globenet.net 52320 S S S GoDaddy http://www.Godaddy.com 26496 S GooGle$Inc. http://https://www.GooGle.com/ 15169 O O O Goscomb$Technologies http://www.Goscomb.net 39326 S S GTT$CommunIcations$(AS4436) http://www.Gtt.net 4436 x x x x GTTQU http://www.unsI.net 20077 x x HGC http://www.hGcQIntl.com/ 9304 S S HGTN.net http://www.hGtn.net 13680 O HibernIa$Networks http://https://www.hIbernIanetworks.com/ 5580 x x x HiGhwInds$Network$Group$Inc http://www.hIGhwInds.com 12989 S S S HonG$KonG$Broadband$Network$LTD http://www.hkbn.net 9269 S HopOne$Internet$Corp. http://www.hopone.net 14361 S Host$VIrtual$Inc http://www.vr.orG 36236 O HostopIa$Inc.$a$Deluxe$Company http://www.hostopIa.com 14116 O Hudson$DIGItal http://www.hudsondIGItal.net 33472 O HurrIcane$ElectrIc http://he.net 6939 O O O O O O O Index$ExchanGe http://IndexexchanGe.com 27381 S Inerail http://Inerail.net/ 33031 S InfoRelay$OnlIne$Systems$Inc http://www.Inforelay.com 33597 O InIt7 http://www.InIt7.net/ 13030 O O O INOC$LLC http://www.Inoc.net/ 22302 S InteGra$Telecom http://www.InteGratelecom.com/ 7385 O O O Internap$(formerly$Voxel) http://www.Internap.com 29791 S S S Internet$InItiative$Japan$Inc.$(IIJ) http://www.IIj.ad.jp/en/ 2497 S S Internet2$TransItRail 11164 S Interoute http://www.Interoute.com 8928 S Interscholz$Inc$North$AmerIca http://www.Interscholz.com 3186 O O InterServer$Inc http://www.Interserver.net 19318 O IP$TransIt$Inc. 46786 O IPTP$Networks http://www.Iptp.net 41095 x x x x ISC http://www.Isc.orG/ 1280 O ISPnet$Inc. http://www.Ispnet.net 22691 O O ISPrIme$LLC. http://www.IsprIme.com 23393 S S S IVent$MobIle$bv 59865 O iWeb$Technologies http://www.Iweb.com 32613 O IX$Reach http://www.Ixreach.com/ 43531 S S S Jaina$Systems$Networks http://www.jainasystems.com 27464 O JIve$CommunIcations$Inc. http://www.jIve.com 6643 O JSC$InterDnestrCom$(IDC) http://Idknet.com/ 1547 O Kaia$Global$Networks$Ltd. http://www.kaiaglobal.com 251 x KDDI http://www.kddI.com/enGlIsh/Index.html 2516 S KPN http://www.kpnQInternational.com 286 x Lantern$Hill$IT http://www.lanternhIllIt.com 53494 O Layer42$Networks http://www.layer42.net/ 8121 S S Leaseweb$Network http://www.leaseweb.com 16265 S S LIberty$Global http://www.lIbertyGlobal.com 6830 x x LIGhtCore$a$CenturyTel$Co. 22561 S LImelIGht$Networks http://www.lImelIGhtnetworks.com/ 22822 S S S Linkedin http://press.lInkedIn.com/about 14413 O O LNTC 29876 O LonG$Island$FIber$ExchanGe$Inc. http://www.lonGIslandfIber.com/ 30653 O Manhattan$ColleGe http://www.manhattan.edu 23171 O O MaxPoInt$Interactive http://www.maxpoInt.com 393565 S MedIa$Network$ServIces http://www.medIanetworkservIces.com 44654 O MedIaMath http://www.medIamath.com 30419 O MeetMe http://www.meetme.com 46656 O MeGaPath$Inc http://www.meGapath.com 4565 S S Microsoft http://www.mIcrosoft.com 8075 S S S MobIle$TeleSystems$OJSC http://www.mtsGsm.com/ 8359 S S S MTN$South$AfrIca http://www.mtnbusIness.co.za 16637 x MTS$Allstream http://www.mtsallstream.com 15290 S S NAVER http://www.naver.com 23576 O O Net$Access$Corp http://www.nac.net 8001 S S S S netcup$GmbH http://www.netcup.de 197540 O NetflIx http://www.netflIx.com/ 2906 O O O O Neuf$CeGetel/SFR http://www.sfr.com 15557 S Neustar http://www.neustarultraservIces.bIz 12008 O NexIcom$Inc. http://www.nexIcom.net/ 11666 S NokIa$Corporation http://www.nokIa.com/ 1248 O NORDUnet$A/S http://www.nordu.net/ 2603 S North$Rock$CommunIcations$Ltd http://www.northrock.bm 13802 O NYI http://www.nyI.net 11403 O O O OnePacket$Inc. http://www.onepacket.com 27970 O OpenDNS$Inc. http://www.opendns.com/ 36692 O O OpenX http://www.openx.com/ 36089 S Opteamax$GmbH 48200 O OVH http://www.ovh.com 16276 O O Packet http://www.packet.net 54825 O O Packet$ClearInG$House http://www.pch.net 3856 O O O Packet$ClearInG$House$AS42 http://www.pch.net/ 42 O O O Pacnet http://www.pacnet.com 10026 S Pando$Networks http://www.pandonetworks.com 26779 O Pavlov$MedIa$INC. http://www.pavlovmedIa.com 23473 O O O PEER$1$HostinG http://www.peer1.com 13768 S S Peer39 http://peer39.com 54183 S PenTeleData http://www.penteledata.net 3737 S PIlosoft$Inc. http://www.pIlosoft.com 26627 O Place$IQ 62469 x Pocketinet$CommunIcations$Inc. http://www.pocketinet.com 23265 O PREPA$NETWORKS$LLC http://www.prepanetworks.net 23550 O PrImus$TelecommunIcations$Canada$Inc http://www.prImus.ca 6407 O O O Produban$ServIcIos$Informaticos$Generales http://www.Produban.com 2134 O PubMatic http://www.pubmatic.com 62713 O PulsepoInt$Inc http://www.pulsepoInt.com 19189 S S RCN http://www.rcn.com/ 6079 S S Reasonnet$IP$Networks http://www.reasonnet.com 25525 S Redder$Telco http://www.redder.It 33986 O RETN http://www.retn.net/ 9002 S S RIPE$NCC$RIS$Project http://www.rIs.rIpe.net/ 12654 S RNK$CommunIcations http://rnkcom.com/ 22829 O Rocket$Fuel$Inc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PEERING: an AS for Us
    PEERING: An AS for Us Brandon Schlinker1, Kyriakos Zarifis1, Italo Cunha2, Nick Feamster3, and Ethan Katz-Bassett1 1University of Southern California — 2Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais — 3Georgia Institute of Technology {bschlink, kyriakos, ethan.kb}@usc.edu — [email protected] — [email protected] ABSTRACT 29, 45]. BGP, the Internet’s interdomain routing protocol, Internet routing suffers from persistent and transient failures, can experience slow convergence [30] and persistent route circuitous routes, oscillations, and prefix hijacks. A ma- oscillations [17,54]. It lacks mechanisms to prevent spoof- jor impediment to progress is the lack of ways to conduct ing [5,27] and prefix hijacks [24,32,58]. Despite known impactful interdomain research. Most research is based ei- problems, little has changed with interdomain routing, and ther on passive observation of existing routes, keeping re- there has been little impactful research in recent years. searchers from assessing how the Internet will respond to This stagnancy in the face of known problems is in stark route or policy changes; or simulations, which are restricted contrast to the rapid innovation in other areas of network- by limitations in our understanding of topology and policy. ing. We are in an era of remarkable changes in networking We propose a new class of interdomain research: re- and its role in our lives, as mobile connectivity and stream- searchers can instantiate an AS of their choice, including ing video change how we use the Internet, and advances in its intradomain topology and interdomain interconnectivity, software defined networking and data centers change how and connect it with the “live” Internet to exchange routes we run networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Real Options in Television Broadcasting
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive User Generated Content: Web 2.0 Taking the Video Sector by Storm Mabillot, David communications strategies March 2007 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/4579/ MPRA Paper No. 4579, posted 23 Aug 2007 UTC User Generated Content: Web 2.0 Taking the Video Sector by Storm David MABILLOT University Paris XIII - CEPN – UMR CNRS 7115 and Maison des Sciences de l'Homme Paris Nord Abstract: This article examines the communities involved in the distribution and sharing of videos on the internet. Firstly, we study the practices connected with user generated content and describe the appearance of new players (YouTube, Dailymotion, Google Video, Zudeo, etc.) in the audiovisual landscape. We then discuss regulation of the new community model of digital content distribution before moving on to underline the need for the film and audiovisual industries to socially construct new cultural and commercial experiences with film fans. Key words: user generated content, information good, communities, markets, audiovisual, film, common good, regulation and intellectual property. ith the advent of Web 2.0, individuals and their social relations Whave moved to the centre of the internet stage (MOUNIER, 2005; GUILLAUD, 2005). A new combination of technologies (Ajax), which encourages total interaction between users and on-line services, is transforming the web from a medium supplied by millions of isolated sites into a platform for the free exchange of information and content produced, edited and distributed by internet surfers, belonging to organised communities and brought together by common interests. This exchange has been made possible by the digitisation and low-cost reproduction of content (MABILLOT, 2006a, 2006b).
    [Show full text]
  • Interconnection
    Interconnection 101 As cloud usage takes off, data production grows exponentially, content pushes closer to the edge, and end users demand data and applications at all hours from all locations, the ability to connect with a wide variety of players becomes ever more important. This report introduces interconnection, its key players and busi- ness models, and trends that could affect interconnection going forward. KEY FINDINGS Network-dense, interconnection-oriented facilities are not easy to replicate and are typically able to charge higher prices for colocation, as well as charging for cross-connects and, in some cases, access to public Internet exchange platforms and cloud platforms. Competition is increasing, however, and competitors are starting the long process of creating network-dense sites. At the same time, these sites are valuable and are being acquired, so the sector is consolidating. Having facili- ties in multiple markets does seem to provide some competitive advantage, particularly if the facilities are similar in look and feel and customers can monitor them all from a single portal and have them on the same contract. Mobility, the Internet of Things, services such as SaaS and IaaS (cloud), and content delivery all depend on net- work performance. In many cases, a key way to improve network performance is to push content, processing and peering closer to the edge of the Internet. This is likely to drive demand for facilities in smaller markets that offer interconnection options. We also see these trends continuing to drive demand for interconnection facilities in the larger markets as well. © 2015 451 RESEARCH, LLC AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES.
    [Show full text]
  • Cologix Torix Case Study
    Internet Exchange Case Study The Toronto Internet Exchange (TorIX) is the largest IX in Canada with more than 175 peering participants benefiting from lower network costs & faster speeds The non-profit Toronto Internet Exchange (TorIX) is a multi-connection point enabling members to use one hardwired connection to exchange traffic with 175+ members on the exchange. With peering participants swapping traffic with one another through direct connections, TorIX reduces transit times for local data exchange and cuts the significant costs of Internet bandwidth. The success of TorIX is underlined by its tremendous growth, exceeding 145 Gbps as one of the largest IXs in the world. TorIX is in Cologix’s data centre at 151 Front Street, Toronto’s carrier hotel and the country’s largest telecommunications hub in the heart of Toronto. TorIX members define their own routing protocols to dictate their traffic flow, experiencing faster speeds with their data packets crossing fewer hops between the point of origin and destination. Additionally, by keeping traffic local, Canadian data avoids international networks, easing concerns related to privacy and security. Above: In Dec. 2014, TorIX traffic peaked above 140 Gbps, with average traffic hovering around 90 Gbps. Beginning Today Launched in July 1996 Direct TorIX on-ramp in Cologix’s151 Front Street Ethernet-based, layer 2 connectivity data centre in Toronto TorIX-owned switches capable of handling Second largest independent IX in North America ample traffic Operated by telecom industry volunteers IPv4 & IPv6 address provided to each peering Surpassed 145 Gbps with 175+ peering member to use on the IX participants, including the Canadian Broke the 61 Gbps mark in Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Youtube Download Convert to Mp3 Online
    Youtube download convert to mp3 online allows you to convert and download your favourite videos from YouTube, Dailymotion and Clipfish in a format like MP3, MP4 and more. It's fast ​ addon for · ​Infos · ​Current music charts · ​Addon. You can now download YouTube videos as MP3 files with HD audio quality. Our leading YouTube to MP3 Converter is also compatible with many other online. Convert YouTube video links to MP3, MP4, AVI with our YouTube Converter and Downloader. Convert your favourite YouTube videos to various formats using our YouTube Converter. Convert and download in these formats: MP3, OGG, AAC, FLAC, WMA, WAV, M4A, MP4, AVI, MOV, MPG, MKV, FLV, WMV. Download YouTube videos to MP3 files in 30 sec. Easy Our FREE YouTube converter makes converting YouTube to mp3 online easier and faster than ever!​YouTube Downloader for · ​YouTube to MP3 · ​How to download music from. The easiest way to download and convert YouTube to MP3 and MP4. Free YouTube to MP3 and YouTube to MP4 online converter and downloader. Convert and download online video and audio to MP3 from YouTube, SoundCloud, Vimeo, Mixcloud, Bandcamp and more. Unlimited conversions and. Convert any YouTube Video to MP3 with our Totally Free cloud based service. It's lightning fast and no download or registration is required! is the most convenient online application for converting YouTube flash video to MP3 audio. Enjoy music with 2conv - your online mp3 converter. Have you ever needed a fast and reliable YouTube to mp3 converter to download videos and favourite. Converts YouTube videos to MP3; Download YouTube videos; Download MP3 from SoundCloud; Convert Dailymotion videos to MP3; Download Dailymotion.
    [Show full text]
  • Peering Concepts and Definitions Terminology and Related Jargon
    Peering Concepts and Definitions Terminology and Related Jargon Presentation Overview Brief On Peering Jargon Peering & Related Jargon BRIEF ON PEERING JARGON Brief On Peering Jargon A lot of terminologies used in the peering game. We shall look at the more common ones. Will be directly related to peering, as well as ancillary non-peering functions that support peering. PEERING & RELATED JARGON Peering & Related Jargon ASN (or AS - Autonomous System Number): . A unique number that identifies a collection/grouping of IP addresses or networks under the control of one entity on the Internet Bi-lateral (peering): . Peering relationships setup “directly” between two networks (see “Multi-lateral [peering]”). BGP (Border Gateway Protocol): . Routing protocol used on the Internet and at exchange points as the de-facto routing technique to share routing information (IPs and prefixes) between networks or between ASNs Peering & Related Jargon Carrier-neutral (data centre): . A facility where customers can purchase network services from “any” other networks within the facility. Cold-potato routing: . A situation where a network retains traffic on its network for as long as possible (see “Hot-potato routing”). Co-lo (co-location): . Typically a data centre where customers can house their network/service infrastructure. Peering & Related Jargon Dark fibre: . Fibre pairs offered by the owner, normally on a lease basis, without any equipment at each end of it to “activate” it (see “Lit fibre”). Data centre: . A purpose-built facility that provides space, power, cooling and network facilities to customers. Demarc (Demarcation): . Typically information about a co-lo customer, e.g., rack number, patch panel and port numbers, e.t.c.
    [Show full text]
  • Peering Personals at TWNOG 4.0
    Peering Personals at TWNOG 4.0 6 Dec. 2019 請注意, Peering Personal 場次將安排於下午時段的演講結束前進行, 請留意議程進行以 確保報告人當時在現場 Please note that Peering Personals will be done in the afternoon sessions so please check with Agenda and be on site. AS number 10133 (TPIX) and 17408 (Chief Telecom) Traffic profile Internet Exchange (Balanced) + ISP (Balanced) Traffic Volume TPIX: 160 Gbps ( https://www.tpix.net.tw/traffic.html ); Chief: 80 Gbps (2015- 10.7G; 2016- 25.9G; 2017- 58G; 2018- 96G) Peering Policy Open Peering Locations Taiwan: TPIX, Chief LY, Chief HD HK: HKIX, AMS-IX, EIE (HK1), Mega-i Europe: AMS-IX Message Biggest IX in Taiwan in both traffic and AS connected (59). Contact •[email protected] or •https://www.peeringdb.com/ix/823 •[email protected] or •https://www.peeringdb.com/net/8666 AS number 7527(JPIX) Traffic profile Internet Exchange (Balanced) Traffic Volume JPIX Tokyo 1.2T &JPIX Osaka 600G Peering Policy Open Peering Locations Tokyo: KDDI Otemachi, NTT Data Otemachi ,Comspace I, Equinix, Tokyo, AT Tokyo, COLT TDC1, NTT DATA Mitaka DC East, NTT COM Nexcenter DC, Meitetsucom DC (Nagoya),OCH DC (Okinawa), BBT New Otemachi DC Osaka: NTT Dojima Telepark, KDDI TELEHOUSE Osaka2, Equinix OS1,Meitetsucom DC (Nagoya), OBIS DC (Okayama) Site introduction: https://www.jpix.ad.jp/en/service_introduction.php Message Of connected ASN: Tokyo 211 Osaka 70 Remarks Our IX switch in Nagoya can offer both JPIX Tokyo vlan and Osaka one. Contact •[email protected] or [email protected] AS number 41095 Traffic profile 1:3 Balanced where content prevail Traffic Volume
    [Show full text]
  • A User-Oriented Performance Comparison of Video Hosting Services
    Computer Communications 116 (2018) 118–131 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Computer Communications journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/comcom A user-oriented performance comparison of video hosting services T ⁎ Alessio Botta ,a,b, Aniello Avallonea, Mauro Garofaloa, Giorgio Ventrea,b a University of Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy b NM2 srl, Napoli, Italy ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Internet streaming is responsible for a significant fraction of Internet traffic. It has been reported to account up to Network neutrality 70% of peak traffic in North American fixed access networks, and this figure is expected to reach 80% by Internet video streaming 2020 [1]. Regarding such a killer service of the Internet, much has been discussed regarding if and how video Network performance hosting providers violate or may violate neutrality principles, in order to give users a “better” service compared to their competitors or other services. In this paper, we provide a contribution to this discussion studying three video hosting providers (i.e. YouTube, Vimeo, and Dailymotion). Specifically, we analyze their delivery infra- structures, including where the servers that provide videos are located, and the performance from a user viewpoint. To assess the performance, we measure throughput and RTT as experienced by users watching real videos of different popularity from several locations around the world and at different day hours. We uncover the performance differences of these providers as a function of the different variables under control and move a step forward to understand what causes such differences. We also study the changes in the infrastructures and related performance over time, performing different measurement campaigns over different years.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Peering Interconnections to a Facility
    Mapping Peering Interconnections to a Facility Vasileios Giotsas Georgios Smaragdakis Bradley Huffaker CAIDA / UC San Diego MIT / TU Berlin CAIDA / UC San Diego [email protected] [email protected] bhuff[email protected] Matthew Luckie kc claffy University of Waikato CAIDA / UC San Diego [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT CCS Concepts Annotating Internet interconnections with robust phys- •Networks ! Network measurement; Physical topolo- ical coordinates at the level of a building facilitates net- gies; work management including interdomain troubleshoot- ing, but also has practical value for helping to locate Keywords points of attacks, congestion, or instability on the In- Interconnections; peering facilities; Internet mapping ternet. But, like most other aspects of Internet inter- connection, its geophysical locus is generally not pub- lic; the facility used for a given link must be inferred to 1. INTRODUCTION construct a macroscopic map of peering. We develop a Measuring and modeling the Internet topology at the methodology, called constrained facility search, to infer logical layer of network interconnection, i. e., autonomous the physical interconnection facility where an intercon- systems (AS) peering, has been an active area for nearly nection occurs among all possible candidates. We rely two decades. While AS-level mapping has been an im- on publicly available data about the presence of net- portant step to understanding the uncoordinated forma- works at different facilities, and execute traceroute mea- tion and resulting structure of the Internet, it abstracts surements from more than 8,500 available measurement a much richer Internet connectivity map. For example, servers scattered around the world to identify the tech- two networks may interconnect at multiple physical lo- nical approach used to establish an interconnection.
    [Show full text]
  • Competitive Effects of Internet Peering Policies
    Competitive Effects of Internet Peering Policies by Paul Milgrom, Bridger Mitchell and Padmanabhan Srinagesh Reprinted from The Internet Upheaval, Ingo Vogelsang and Benjamin Compaine (eds), Cambridge: MIT Press (2000): 175-195. ABSTRACT This paper analyzes of two kinds of Internet interconnection arrangements: peering relationships between core Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and transit sales by core ISPs to other ISPs. Core backbone providers jointly produce an intermediate output -- full routing capability -- in an upstream market. All ISPs use this input to produce Internet-based services for end users in a downstream market. It is argued that a vertical market structure with relatively few core ISPs can be relatively efficient given the technological economies of scale and transaction costs arising from Internet addressing and routing. The analysis of costs identifies instances in which an incumbent core ISP’s refusal to peer with a rival or potential rival might promote economic efficiency. A separate bargaining analysis of peering relationships identifies conditions under which a core ISP might be able to use its larger size and associated network effects to refuse to peer with a rival, thus raising its rival’s costs and ultimately increasing prices to end users. An economic analysis of competitive harm arising from refusals to peer should consider cost-based, efficiency-enhancing justifications as well as attempts to raise rivals’ costs. Paul Milgrom Bridger Mitchell and Padmanabhan Srinagesh Department of Economics Charles River Associates Stanford University 285 Hamilton Avenue Stanford, CA 94305-6072 Palo Alto, CA 94301 2 1 Introduction This paper describes the technology and organization of Internet services markets and analyses how peering arrangements among core Internet Service Providers (ISPs) can affect efficiency and competition in these markets.
    [Show full text]
  • PEERING PARTICIPANTS • Managedway Company • Merit Network Inc
    DETROIT INTERNET EXCHANGE (DET-IX) 123NET PROVIDES ENTERPRISE DATA CENTER, NETWORK & VOICE SERVICES TO MICHIGAN BUSINESSES WHAT IS AN INTERNET EXCHANGE? The Detroit Internet Exchange (DET-IX) is a regional Internet Exchange Point (IXP) that was launched in 2015. The Internet exchange point (IXP) is where networks come together to peer or exchange traffic. While they allow network operators to exchange traffic with other network operators, an exchange point will not PEERING sell you a complete Internet connectivity. They are, instead, one of the building blocks around which the Internet is PARTICIPANTS built. When connecting to a major peering hub it greatly reduces traffic a provider must purchase from an upstream provider. The best part is that membership is free! • 123.net • A2 Hosting, Inc. WHO CONNECTS TO THEM? • ACD.net/ACD Telecom, Inc. Any network that wants to peer with other networks can connect to an exchange point. Traditionally, this meant Internet service providers (ISPs) but with the growing need for connections to alternative providers like content and • Acenet, Inc advertising, companies are connecting to exchanges. These companies are peering with ISPs to get their content to • Active Solutions Group their customer base. • Akamai Technologies • Amazon.com BENEFITS Bilateral Peering • Aptient Consulting Group Inc. Traffic exchanged directly between • Amplex Electric, Inc two members of the DET-IX over the • Clear Rate Communications, Inc shared exchange fabric. INTERNET CONTENT SERVICE PROVIDER PROVIDER • CloudFlare Multilateral Peering • Cloudsafe, Ltd. Traffic exchanged directly between • CMSInter.net, LLC members wishing to peer directly INTERNET CONTENT • D & P Communications with any carrier. SERVICE PROVIDER PROVIDER • Daystarr Communications Purchase Upstream • Everstream An added benefit of the exchange • Facebook is the ability to purchase upstream from the on-net carriers present in • Fastly, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • IPTP Networks 2 Contents
    1 www.iptp.net IPTP Networks 2 Contents CONTENTS Our history ........................................................................ 4 About us ............................................................................... 6 Global partnership .............................................................. 10 1-Stop-IT-Shop .................................................................... 12 A-Z Infrastructure ................................................................13 Managed services ..............................................................14 Managed Security Services .................................................................................. 15 IPTP Pentest ........................................................................................................... 15 Global Network and Points of Presence Map ....................................................... 16 Managed Connectivity Services ............................................................................... 17 Internet Exchanges and peering facilities .................................................................. 19 Low Latency Routes Map ......................................................................................... 20 Map of Cable Systems ........................................................................................... 21 Data Centers ....................................................................... 24 Managed Datacenter Services ...................................................................................24
    [Show full text]