Initial Environmental Examination
April 2019
PHI: Integrated Natural Resources and Environmental Management Project
Rehabilitation of Centro Sta. Cruz to Sitio Lapak Access Road
Prepared by Municipality of Claveria, Province of Misamis Oriental for the Asian Development Bank . CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 15 March 2019) The date of the currency equivalents must be within 2 months from the date on the cover. Currency unit – peso (PhP) PhP 1.00 = $ 0.01902 $1.00 = PhP 52.5559
ABBREVIATIONS
4Ps Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program ADB Asian Development Bank AIP Annual Investment Plan BDC Barangay Development Council BLGU Barangay Local Government Unit BUB Bottom-Up Budgeting CBFMA Community Base Forest Management Areas CENRO Community Environment and Natural Resources Office CLUP Comprehensive Land Use Planning CNC Certificate of Non-Coverage CSC Construction Supervision Consultant CSO Civil Society Organization COE Council of Elders CP Contractor’s Profit DBST Double Bituminous Surface Treatment DED Detail Engineering Design DENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources DILG Department of Interior and Local Government DOST Department of Science and Technology DSWD Department of Social Welfare and Development ECA Environmentally Critical Area ECC Environmental Compliance Certificate ECP Environmentally Critical Project EHSM Environmental Health and Safety Manager EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIAMMP Environmental Impact Assessment Management and Monitoring Plan EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMB Environmental Management Bureau EMP Environmental Management Plan ESS Environmental Safeguards Specialist GAD Gender and Development IEE Initial Environmental Examination INREMP Integrated Natural Resources and Environment Management Project IP Indigenous People IROW Infrastructure Right of Way LGU Local Government Unit LPRAT Local Poverty Reduction Action Team MAMACILA Mat-I, Man-ibay, Civoleg and Langguyod MIHITRICO Minalwang Higaononon Tribal Council MDC Municipal Development Council MOSCAT Misamis Oriental Science and Technology MPN Most Probable Number NAAQ National Ambient Air Quality Guidelines NAMRIA National Mapping and Resource Information Authority NCB National Competitive Bidding ii
NCIP National Commission on Indigenous People NECA Non-Environmental Critical Area NECP Non-Environmental Critical Project NIA National Irrigation Administration NPCO National Project Coordinating Office NRIMP National Road Improvement and Management Program NRM Natural Resources Management O&M Operation and Management OCM Overhead, Contingencies and Miscellaneous PAGASA Philippine Atmospheric Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration PDR Project Description Report PMIC Project Management Implementation Consultant PMO Project Management Office PMU Project Management Unit PO People’s Organization POW Program of Works PPCO Provincial Project Management Offices PRECIS Providing Regional Climates for Impacts Studies PSA Philippine Statistics Authority PUGA Pugaan Upland Growers Association PWD Persons with Disability RC Reinforced Concrete RCPC Reinforced Concrete Pipe Culvert REA Rapid Environmental Assessment RPCO Regional Project Coordinating Offices RHO Regional Hearing Officer RI Rural Infrastructure RROW Road Right of Way SP Sangguniang Panlungsod SBD Standard Bidding Document SEMS Social and Environmental Management Systems SPMU Sub-Project Management Unit SPS Safeguard Policy Statement SSS Social Safeguards Specialist SPS Safeguard Policy Statement TA Technical Assistance TDS Total Dissolved Solids TOR Terms of Reference TSP Total Suspended Particulates WMA Watershed Management Area WMPCO Watershed Management and Project Coordination Offices
iii
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES
˚C – degree centigrade ha – Hectare km – Kilometer m – Meter m asl – meter above sea level mm – Millimeter mg/L – milligram per liter mg/Nm3 – milligram per normal cubic meter ppt – parts per thousand μg/Nm3 – microgram per normal cubic meter µS/cm – micro Siemens/cm % – Percent
NOTE
In this report, "$" refers to US dollars unless otherwise stated.
This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 1 II. POLICY, LEGAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ...... 3 A. Environmental Clearance Requirements ...... 3 1. Government Environmental Laws, Regulations and Guidelines ...... 3 2. ADB Environmental Assessment Requirements ...... 6 III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ...... 6 A. Overview ...... 6 B. Project Location ...... 7 C. Project Rationale ...... 8 D. Project Development Plan ...... 9 1. Project Components ...... 9 2. Description of the Project Phases ...... 11 3. Manpower Requirements ...... 12 4. Project Cost ...... 12 5. Project Duration and Schedule ...... 13 IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT ...... 13 A. Slope and Elevation ...... 14 B. Geology ...... 15 C. Soil Profile ...... 15 D. Water Quality ...... 17 E. Land Classification ...... 18 F. Land Cover and Land Use ...... 19 G. Climate ...... 21 I. Biological Environment ...... 22 J. Socio-Economic Conditions ...... 23 1. Population ...... 23 2. Population Density ...... 24 3. Indigenous Peoples ...... 26 4. Peoples’ Organizations/ Tenurial Instrument ...... 26 5. Education ...... 27 6. Health and Sanitation ...... 27 7. Current Family Income ...... 28 8. Tourism ...... 29 9. Road and Transportation ...... 29 10. Production Area ...... 30 11. Fisheries ...... 30 12. Electricity ...... 30 V. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ...... 31 A. Pre-Construction ...... 33 1. Confirmation of no required resettlement, relocations, and compensation ...... 33 2. Identification and prioritization of road section where re-gravelling will be done ...... 33 3. Preparation of detailed engineering designs and programs of work ...... 33 4. Recruitment of workers ...... 34 B. Construction ...... 34 1. Construction materials acquisition, transport access, and storage system ...... 34 2. Clearing and removal of obstructions ...... 34 3. Ground surface leveling and gravelling of existing access road ...... 34 4. Civil works ...... 35 5. Construction of drainage system ...... 35 6. Implementation of noise and dust control measure ...... 35 7. Dust and noise from borrow pits ...... 36 8. Implementation of spoil management and control measure ...... 36
v
9. Solid and liquid construction waste management system ...... 36 10. Water Quality ...... 36 11. Workers health, safety and hygiene ...... 37 12. Traffic safety and management ...... 37 13. Drainage System Construction ...... 38 14. Ecological environment (Flora and Fauna) ...... 38 15. Damaged to properties ...... 38 16. Concrete washout ...... 38 17. Use of hazardous substances ...... 39 18. Public safety ...... 39 C. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Phase ...... 39 1. Operation of upgraded access road ...... 39 VI. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION, AND PARTICIPATION ...... 40 A. Stakeholder Consultations ...... 40 B. Information Disclosure ...... 42 VII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ...... 42 VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ...... 44 A. Implementation Arrangements ...... 44 B. Environmental Impact Mitigation Plan ...... 45 C. Environmental Monitoring ...... 55 IX. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ...... 57 A. Conclusion ...... 57 B. Recommendation ...... 58
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1:Vicinity Map of the Municipality of Claveria ...... 7 Figure 2: Location of the Subproject Influence Area ...... 8 Figure 3: Typical Road Section ...... 9 Figure 4: Slope and Elevation of the Proposed Subproject ...... 15 Figure 5: Geologic Map of the Municipality of Claveria ...... 16 Figure 6: Soil Map of the Municipality of Claveria ...... 16 Figure 7: Land Classification Map of Claveria ...... 19 Figure 8: Existing General Land Use of Claveria...... 20 Figure 9: Photopgrahs during Site Validation in Brgy. Sta. Cruz, Claveria ...... 23
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Summary List of ECP Types and ECA Categories ...... 3 Table 2: INREMP subprojects threshold for coverage screening and categorization (EMB-MC 005-2014) ...... 4 Table 3: Breakdown of Cost Estimates ...... 12 Table 4: Implementation Schedule ...... 13 Table 5: Names of Barangays and Land Area Covered ...... 13 vi
Table 6: Slope Classification in Barangay Sta. Cruz ...... 14 Table 7: Water quality assessment in the Tagolaon River ...... 17 Table 8: Land Classification of Barangay Sta. Cruz ...... 19 Table 9: General Land Uses of Barangay Sta. Cruz ...... 20 Table 10: Temperature Data of Claveria ...... 21 Table 11: Seasonal Temperature and Rainfall under medium-range emission scenario in Misamis Oriental in 2020 and 2050 ...... 22 Table 12: Frequency of extreme events in 2020 and 2050 under medium-range ...... 22 Table 13: Population Projections by Barangay ...... 24 Table 14: Population Gross Density and Net Density by Barangay ...... 25 Table 15: List of CBFMs in Claveria ...... 26 Table 16: Inventory of Existing Health Facilities in the Municipality ...... 27 Table 17: Municipal Inventory of Household with Toilet Facility ...... 28 Table 18: Average Monthly Income of the Municipality ...... 29 Table 19: Average Monthly Income of Barangay Sta. Cruz per Household ...... 29 Table 20: List of Barangay Sta. Cruz Farm Products ...... 30 Table 21: Assessment of Potential Environmental Impacts...... 31 Table 22: Summary of Stakeholder Views of the Road Rehabilitation ...... 40 Table 23: Responsibilities for EMP Implementation ...... 44 Table 24: Environmental Impact Mitigation Plan ...... 45 Table 25: Environmental Monitoring Plan ...... 55
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 1: ECC status and proof of payment ...... 59 Appendix 2: Field validation Aide Memoire on June 5-7, 2018 ...... 60 Appendix 3: Minutes of public consultation on June 6, 2018 ...... 66 Appendix 4: Minutes of IP and IEE public consultation on June 22, 2018 (English) ...... 73 Appendix 5: SCHTA resolution of support (Visayan and English) ...... 90 Appendix 6: PO PUGA and brgy. council consultative meetings and resolutions of endorsement ...... 92 Appendix 7: SB resolution affirming interest of the LGU ...... 100 Appendix 8: EO reconstituted SPMU ...... 101 Appendix 9: Grievance Intake Form ...... 103
vii
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. This Initial Environmental Examination has been prepared for Rehabilitation of Centro Sta. Cruz to Sitio Lapak Access Road which is located in Barangay Sta. Cruz, Municipality of Claveria, Misamis Oriental. This road rehabilitation subproject will focus on the concreting of the 2.29 km existing access. The roadway surface is 4.00 m width concrete carriageway 0.50- meter shoulder on both sides with 0.50 ditch canal.
2. The proposed access road rehabilitation will start where the Sta. Cruz Elementary School is located (Sta. 0+000) and will end at Sitio Lapak at a road junction going to the Brgy. Kiabo, Municipality of Malitbog, Bukidnon and to Centro Brgy. Lanise, Claveria (Sta. 2+288).
3. The subproject, which has an estimated project duration of 98 calendar days and will be implemented by contract, has an updated preliminary project cost of Php 17,279,566.32 with Php 13,823,653.05 (80%) to be funded by INREMP and Php 3,455,913.26 (20%) as LGU equity.
4. The subproject has been categorized by ADB as Environment Category B and this IEE was prepared consistent with the environmental assessment requirements of ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement of 2009. The IEE was carried out through scree ning and analysis of various environmental parameters, field-based investigations, stakeholder consultations, and review of other road subproject reports in the Philippines. The IEE cover s the general environmental profile of Claveria rural infrastructure subproject and includes an assessment of the potential environmental impacts during different phases and formulation of corresponding mitigation measures. The IEE was prepared by the LGU of Claveria in coordi nation with the NPCO, RPCO, WMCO, POs and the consultant.
5. The direct beneficiaries of the proposed subproject, which i s located within the forestland, are the residents of Barangay Sta. Cruz with a total population of 1,377. The barangay has a total land area of 1,131 ha of which 630 ha are forestland and 501 ha are classified as alienable and disposable lands. The A and D lands are already issued with Land Titles and Tax Declarations while the areas in the forestlands are given the Community-Based Forest Management Agreement (CBFMA), under the name of the Pugaan Upland Growers Association (PUGA) with a total land area of 395 ha, which used to be under the Contract of Stewardship Certificate (CSC) issued by the DENR to the benefic iaries.
6. The Indigenous People and all the residents of the barangay recognize the opportunities that they will benefit from the rehabilitation of the access road so a resolution endorsing the project was issued by the tribal council. A barangay resolution of support is also issued endorsing the subproject.
7. Major land use along the road rehabilitation project is agriculture which is part of production forest. None of the sub-project roads are located ne ar or within ecologically sensitive areas.
8. The IEE, based on the screening of baseline environment and review of proposed civil works, has not identified any major environmental concerns give n that all the proposed civil works are only asset preservation of existing roadway and are l ocated within existing right of way. There will only be localized short-term impacts during construction activities due to implementation of civil works that will be addressed in the det ailed design and through 1
implementation of the mitigation and monitoring measures specified in the environmental management plan.
9. The IEE process included stakeholders’ participation and consultation to help LGUs achieve public acceptance of the subproject. A series of consultations were conducted in Barangay Sta Cruz residents and tribal leaders and members of the Pugaan Upland Growers Association. The stakeholders confirmed that the proposed access road rehabilitation wiill uplift their living condition and improve the quality of life considering more agricultural production with a higher farm gate price generated.
10. The IEE, based on the screening of baseline environment and review of proposed civil works, has not identified any major environmental concerns due to the proposed Rehabilitation of Centro Sta. Cruz to Sitio Lapak access road. There will only be localized short-term impacts during construction activities due to the implementation of civil works that will be addressed in the detailed design and through implementation of the mitigation and monitoring measures specified in the Environmental Management Plan (EMP).
11. A grievance redress mechanism has been established by the LGU of Claveria prior to commencement of site works to ensure that complaints of affected persons, especially the IPs/ICCs, and other stakeholders regarding the project’s environmental performance are promptly addressed. Furthermore, giving primacy to the traditional conflict resolution system, grievance procedure has been separately set in accordance with the tribe’s customary laws and the requirements of IPRA or RA 8371.
12. The IEE includes an EMP which details the mitigation measures, environmental monitoring activities, institutional responsibilities, and environmental management capacity building. The LGU, through its Municipal Planning and Development Office and the Municipal Engineering Office, will ensure that relevant EMP provisions are included in bid and contract documents for detailed design, project supervision, and civil works. During construction, they will closely conduct monitoring of the contractor’s environmental performance and over-all EMP implementation. Semi-annual environmental monitoring reports will be submitted by the LGU to ADB, and such reports will be posted on ADB’s website for public disclosure.
13. The major positive impact of the subproject will be in the economic aspect, as well as better accessibility. The subproject will directly benefit the people located within the barangay, especially the Pugaan Upland Growers Association, through improved access to basic services, and economic development. Environmental consideration of the proposed subproject will be incorporated in the EIAMMP where possible adverse impacts will be identified including the corresponding mitigating measures in every phase of subproject implementation.
14. This subproject will have overall beneficial impact to the stakeholders within the influence area, and will have minor negative impacts that will be carefully monitored and adequately mitigated through the implementation of the EMP.
2
II. POLICY, LEGAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
A. Environmental Clearance Requirements
1. Government Environmental Laws, Regulations and Guidelines
15. According to the EMB Memorandum Circular 005 - 2014, the environmental category of a project is decided based on the type of the project (whether it falls within the ‘Environmental Critical Project’, ECP type), location of the project (whether it falls within the ‘Environmental Critical Areas’, ECA category), and size of the project. A summary list of ECPs and ECA categories are presented in Table 1.
Table 1: Summary List of ECP Types and ECA Categories A. List of ECPs As declared by Proclamation No. 2146 (1981) 1. Heavy Industries – Non-ferrous Metal Industries, Iron and Steel Mills, Petroleum and Petro-chemical Industries including Oil and Gas, Smelting Plants 2. Resource Extractive Industries – Major Mining and Quarrying Projects, Forestry Projects (logging, major wood processing projects, introduction of fauna (exotic animals) in public and private forests, forest occupancy, extraction of mangrove products, grazing), Fishery Projects (dikes for/ and fishpond development 3. Infrastructu) re Projects – Major Dams, Major Power Plants (fossil-fueled, nuclear fueled, hydroelectric or geothermal), Major Reclamation Projects, Major Roads and Bridges As declared by Proclamation No. 803 (1996) 4. All golf course projects B. List of ECA Categories - As declared by Proclamation No. 2146 (1981) 1. All areas declared by law as national parks, watershed reserves, wildlife preserves, sanctuaries 2. Areas set aside as aesthetic potential tourist spots 3. Areas which constitute the habitat of any endangered or threatened species of Philippine wildlife (flora and fauna) 4. Areas of unique historic, archaeological, or scientific interests 5. Areas which are traditionally occupied by cultural communities or tribes 6. Areas frequently visited and/or hard-hit by natural calamities (geologic hazards, floods, typhoons, volcanic activity, etc.) 7. Areas with critical slopes 8. Areas classified as prime agricultural lands 9. Recharged areas of aquifers 10. Water bodies characterized by one or any combination of the following conditions: tapped for domestic purposes; within the controlled and/or protected areas declared by appropriate authorities; which support wildlife and fishery activities 11. Mangrove areas characterized by one or any combination of the following conditions: with primary pristine and dense young growth; adjoining mouth of major river systems; near or adjacent to traditional productive fry or fishing grounds; areas which act as natural buffers against shore erosion, strong winds and storm floods; areas on which people are dependent for their livelihood.
3
12. Coral reefs characterized by one or any combination of the following conditions: With 50% and above live coralline cover; Spawning and nursery grounds for fish; Act as natural breakwater of coastlines
16. Based on the type, size, and location the projects have been classified into three (3) major groups, as follows:
Group I (ECPs): ECPs in either ECAs or NECAs – Environmentally Critical Projects in either Environmentally Critical Areas or Non-Environmentally Critical Areas. These projects require the proponent to submit ‘Environmental Impact Statement’ report to secure ‘Environmental Compliance Certificate’ from DENR’s Environment Management Bureau (EMB). Table 2 gives the size of the road and bridge projects that fall in to Group 1; Group II (NECPs): NECPS in ECAs – Non-Environmentally Critical Projects in Environmentally Critical Areas. These projects require proponent to submit either ‘Initial Environmental Examination’ Report or ‘Project Description Report ‘based on the size of the project (see Table 2) to secure either ECC or ‘Certificate of Non-Coverage’; Group III (Non- Co ve r e d Projects): NECPs in NECS – Non- En vi r o n mentally C r i t i c a l Projects in Non-Environmentally Critical Areas. PDR required to be submitted for Enhancement Mitigation Projects for confirmation of benign nature of proposed activity, and CNC is required to be secured. All other projects shall be at the option of the proponent to prepare a PDR as a basis for CNC, should the proponent opt to secure one.
Table 2: INREMP subprojects threshold for coverage screening and categorization (EMB-MC 005-2014) Not covered Covered (Required to secure ECC) (may secure CNC) Projects within the Project size CATEGORY A: ECP CATEGORY B: Non-ECP CATEGORY D INREMP Menu of parameters / Project Subprojects Remarks EIS EIS IEE Checklist Description (Part I only) HEAVY AND OTHER PROCESSING/ MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES Food preservation (e.g. drying, freezing) and Regardless of None None None similar methods aside capacity from canning Agricultural processing including rice, corn, > 5,000 MT Annual vegetables, fruits and none ≥ 50,000 MT but < 50,000 <5,000 MT production rate other agricultural MT products > ton/hr or mill with polishing (regardless of Hourly Rice/Corn mill None None ≤ 1 ton/hr production production rate rate if with polishing) Other types of food (and other food by- > 200 MT but Annual products, additives, None ≥ 50,000 MT < 200 MT < 50,000 MT production rate etc.) processing industries RESOURCES EXTRATIVE INDUSTRIES
4
Not covered Covered (Required to secure ECC) (may secure CNC) Projects within the Project size CATEGORY A: ECP CATEGORY B: Non-ECP CATEGORY D INREMP Menu of parameters / Project Subprojects Remarks EIS EIS IEE Checklist Description (Part I only) Other Forestry ≥ 5,000 m3 Annual volume Projects; Forestry ≥ 100 m3 but ≥ 10,000 m3 but <10,000 <100 m3 of trees to be project co-managed <5,000 m3 m3 cut with DENR ≥ 4,000 m3 Equivalent Wood processing ≥ 100 m3 but ≥ 10,000 m3 but <10,000 <100 m3 products per projects <4,000 m3 m3 year Livestock Animal Industries ≥ 5,000 > 100 but Stocking (Livestock/Piggery None <100 heads heads 5,000 heads population Projects – e.g. pigs/goats) INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Irrigation projects ≥1,000 >300 but (distribution system None hectares <1,000 ≤300 hectares Service area only) (service area) hectares With water source (e.g. infiltration gallery, etc.) and water Level III Level II / Level I Water Supply Projects None treatment (Distribution Water refilling (without dam) facilities system only) station including desalination, reverse osmosis (RO) >50% >50% increase in increase in capacity (or in capacity (or terms of in terms of length/width) >50% increase in length/width) AND capacity (or in Roads, widening, AND >2km but terms of rehabilitation and/or None ≥20km, <20km, length/width) BUT ≤ improvement (length with (length with 2km increase in no critical no critical length slope) OR slope) OR ≥10km ≥10km (length (length with with critical critical slope) slope) Total/gross floor area Storage facilities with >1 hectare including no hazardous or toxic None ≥ 5 hectare but ≤ 1 hectare parking, open materials. <5 hectare space and other areas
17. This subproject is a an improvement of an existing barangay road which falls under the group of Non-ECP while ADB has categorized the subproject as environment Category B. Considering that the total length of the road proposed to be rehabilitated is 2.29 km, an ECC application and corresponding payment has been made by the LGU of Claveria to the EMB Region 10 as attached in Appendix 1. At present, the status of ECC application is still pending.
5
2. ADB Environmental Assessment Requirements
18. According to ADB guidelines, the process of determining a project’s environment category is to prepare a Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) screening checklist, taking into account the type, size, and location of the proposed project. Based on ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 (SPS 2009), a project is classified as one (1) of the four (4) environmental categories (A, B, C, or FI), as follows:
• Category A: Projects with potential for significant adverse environmental impacts that are irreversible, diverse or unprecedented. These impacts may affect an area larger than the sites or facilities subject to physical works. An environmental impact assessment is required;
• Category B: Projects judged to have some adverse environmental impacts,ut b of lesser degree and/or significance than those for category A projects. Impacts are site- specific, few if any of them are irreversible, and in most cases mitigation measures can be designed more readily than for Category A projects. An initial environmental examination (IEE) is required;
• Category C: Projects likely to have minimal or no adverse environmental impacts. No environmental assessment is required although environmental implications are still reviewed; and
• Category FI: Projects are classified as category FI if they involve investment of funds to or through a financial intermediary. Where the FI’s investment have minimal or no adverse environmental risks. The FI project will be treated as Category C. All other FI’s must establish and maintain an environmental and social management system and must comply with the environmental safeguards requirements specified in SPS 2009 if the FI’s subprojects have the potential for significant adverse environmental impacts.
19. According to Philippines’ environmental guidelines, the Project or Sub-project can be considered as either under Group II or III while ADB has categorized the Project as environment Category B. Hence, this IEE has been prepared to meet the requirements of both the ADB and the Philippine Government. Upon ADB’s receipt of the final IEE from the proponent, this will be publicly disclosed through posting on ADB’s website.
III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
A. Overview
20. The rehabilitation of Centro Sta. Cruz to Sitio Lapak access road aims to uplift the quality of life of the people thru the provision of all-year-round, easy and affordable access thereby improving the prompt delivery of basic services, increasing economic opportunities and conditions. The access road rehabilitation will support the national resources management project activities of the constituents.
6
B. Project Location
21. Claveria is the only landlocked municipality among the twenty-four (24) municipalities of the province of Misamis Oriental. It lies at approximately 8° 34’ to 8° 55’ north latitude and 124°45’ to 125°25’ east longitude. It is bounded on the east by the Province of Agusan del Norte; on the south by the Province of Bukidnon; on the north by the coastal Municipalities of Balingasag, Lagonglong, Salay, Sugbongcogon, Kinoguitan, Balingoan, Medina and Gingoog; and on the west by the Municipalities of Jasaan and Villanueva. The municipality is located approximately 40-kilometer northeast of Cagayan de Oro City, the highly urbanized center in Northern Mindanao.
Figure 1:Vicinity Map of the Municipality of Claveria
22. In particular, the subproject is located in the southern part of the Municipality which is in Barangay Sta. Cruz, Claveria, Misamis Oriental and falls within the Tagoloan River Basin. It is situated in between Barangay Lanise and Barangay Poblacion. The distance of the subproject from the urban center of Barangay Poblacion is about three (3) kilometers as shown in Figure 2.
7
Figure 2: Location of the Subproject Influence Area
C. Project Rationale
23. The direct beneficiaries of the proposed subproject, which is located within the forestland, are the residents of Barangay Sta. Cruz with a total population of 1,377 wherein 734 are males and 643 females. The barangay has a total land area of 1,131 ha of which 630 ha are forestland and 501 ha being alienable and disposable (A and D) lands. Within this barangay, the A and D lands are already issued with land titles and tax declarations while the areas in the forestlands are given the Community-Based Forest Management Agreement (CBFMA), under the name of the Pugaan Upland Growers Association (PUGA) with a 395 ha total land area, which used to be under the Contract of Stewardship Certificate (CSC) issued by the DENR to the beneficiaries.
24. Out of the 1,377 residents of the barangay, 566 or 41%, which comprises of 214 males and 352 females, are Indigenous People (IPs) belonging to the Higaonon Tribe. Similarly, the Cebuanos comprise 520 males and 291 females totaling 811 individuals. The IPs has a registered tribal association called the Sta. Cruz Higaonon Tribal Association (SCHTA) which is a recipient of a draft animal project of the Mindanao Rural Development Project (MRDP) and is represented by Datu Eulogio D. Playto.
25. The primary source of income of the people of Barangay Sta. Cruz is farming. A lot of farm products, such as; corn, banana, camote, vegetables, coconut, coffee, and cacao; variety of fruit-bearing trees (e.g. marang, jackfruit, durian, mangosteen, macopa, avocado, rambutan, 8
santol, and others) have been planted by the farmers. Despite of the productivity of the barangay in terms of farming, the poor accessibility of the road from Centro Sta. Cruz to Sitio Lapak remains a problem to the residents, especially to the IPs and other farmers. Sometimes, they have to postpone the transportation of their crops going to the market. In this case, the quality and quantity of their products are diminished, and thus, greatly affecting their supposed projected income. In addition, the travel time is longer and the cost of transportation of farm commodities is high due to the road condition.
D. Project Development Plan
1. Project Components
26. The proposed rehabilitation is 4.00 m width concrete carriageway, 0.50-meter shoulder on both sides with 0.50 m ditch canal and thickness of 0.20 m. The sub-base course is 100 mm thick. Typical section of the roadway is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Typical Road Section
27. There are no structures or properties that are within the road right of way (RROW) and there are no critical structures within the project site. Moreover, the proposed major and minor structures for waterways traversed by the proposed road will follow the existing stations for drainage crossing. There are about 24 linear meter of the reinforced concrete pipe culvert (RCPC) with 900 mm diameter and storm drainage that will be installed along the road network.
28. The proposed subproject needs bulldozer, grader, road roller, dump trucks, backhoe, pay loader and transit mixer. These equipment are necessary to ensure that the detailed engineering design is comprehensively followed during the implementation.
9
29. Road specifications and work items are as follows:
Excavation – This shall consist of roadway and drainage and borrow excavation and the disposal of material in accordance with this Specification and in conformity with the lines, grades and dimensions shown on the Plans or established by the Engineer.
Structure Excavation – This Item shall consist of the necessary excavation for foundation of bridges, culverts, under drains, and other structures not otherwise provided for in the Specifications. It shall also include the furnishing and placing of approved foundation fill material to replace unsuitable material encountered below the foundation elevation of structures.
Embankment – This Item shall consist of the construction of embankment in accordance with this Specification and in conformity with the lines, grades and dimensions shown on the Plans or established by the Engineer.
Sub-grade Preparation – This Item shall consist of the preparation of the sub- grade for the support of overlying structural layers. It shall extend to full width of the roadway; sub-grade preparation shall not be done unless the Contractor is able to start immediately the construction of the pavement structure.
Aggregate Sub-base Course – This item shall consist of furnishing, placing and compacting an aggregate sub-base course on a prepared sub grade in accordance with this Specification and the lines, grades and cross-sections shown on the Plans. Aggregate for sub-base shall consist of hard, durable particles or fragments of crushed stone, crushed slag, or crushed or natural gravel and filler of natural or crushed sand or other finely divided mineral matter. The composite material shall be free from vegetable matter and lumps or balls of clay, and shall be of such nature that it can be compacted readily to form a firm, stable sub-base.
Portland Cement Concrete Pavement – This Item shall consist of pavement of Portland Cement Concrete, with or without reinforcement, constructed on the prepared base in accordance with this Specification and in conformity with lines, grades, thickness and typical cross-section shown on the Plans. Only Type I Portland Cement shall be used unless otherwise provided for in the Special Provisions. Different brands or the same brands from different mills shall not be mixed nor shall they be used alternately unless the mix is approved by the Engineer. Cement which for any reason has become partially set or which contains lumps of caked cement will be rejected. The total length is 2.29 km by 4.00 m width by 0.20 m.
Reinforced Concrete Culvert Pipe & Storm Drainage – This item shall consist of the construction or reconstruction of pipe culverts and storm drains, hereinafter referred to as “conduit” in accordance with this Specification and in conformity with the lines and grades shown on the Plans or as established by the Engineer.
Grouted Riprap – This item shall consist of the furnishing and placing of riprap with grout. It is a material used to armor shorelines, streambeds, bridge abutments, piling and other structures against scour and water. 10
2. Description of the Project Phases
a. Pre-Construction Phase/Pre-Development Phase
30. This phase would involve the social preparation (to include organizational strengthening, planning, identification and prioritization of community needs) of the community for the entry of the subproject to the site, conduct of pre-engineering activities covering detailed survey works to determine alignment of roads and canal systems, preparation of the detailed engineering plans and programs of work. These activities will be conducted by the proponent technical staff, partner line agencies, community beneficiaries, and the contractor.
b. Construction/Development Phase
31. This phase would involve the mobilization of construction equipment, construction workers and materials to the specific subproject site after which the longer period of actual construction work will commence. The construction phase will end up with the demobilization of construction equipment, workers and other construction paraphernalia from the construction site. Majority of these activities will be undertaken by the contractor and community beneficiaries under the close supervision of the SPMU, most especially by the Municipal Engineering Unit. Prior to actual mobilization, however, a community assembly among the beneficiaries will be undertaken, including the IPs.
c. Operation Phase and Maintenance Phase
32. This phase involves the actual maintenance of the rehabilitated access road during its expected economic life. Monitoring tools and parameters will be set forth in the MOA that the LGU and DENR have signed to ensure sustainability of the constructed facility. The specific monitoring items and parameters, location and frequency, monitoring responsibilities and sources of budget are presented in the EIAMMP.
33. This phase will also involve the designation of spoils storage area of at least 25 m away from water bodies for proper disposal of excavated materials, wetting areas of dust sources along vehicle route, and regular removal of debris, logs and other materials along drainage canals. The project will be managed by the Municipal Engineering Office in coordination with the Barangay LGU, and PO (i.e. PUGA).
d. Abandonment Phase
34. This phase is included in the project demobilization. The proponent does not intend to abandon any facilities and unserviceable equipment used during construction. The project location will not be abandoned in disorderly condition but instead restored for functional use. Following the completion of the construction, the proponent will dismantle temporary shelters and the construction yard including unserviceable vehicles and equipment.
35. Wastes arising from the abandonment are expected to be minimal. These wastes could include small volumes of left-over sand and gravel, re-bars and other steel materials (i.e., nails and welding rods), cement sacks, tarpaulins, lumber, used oil and grease. 11
3. Manpower Requirements
36. Construction activities will require hiring of skilled and unskilled manpower. It is assumed that some skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled manpower will be available in the influence area, taking into consideration the women and the IPs. Skilled manpower not available in the locality may be sourced out from other nearby localities. Technical manpower will be a complementation of specialists to be provided by locally known engineering firms.
37. During the construction phase, a workforce consisting of contractual and regular laborers will be employed, which include qualified women and members of the IPs/ICCs, to carry out the construction of the proposed subproject. The Contractor shall employ qualified and sufficient staff to carry out inspections, testing and monitoring for the subproject.
4. Project Cost
38. The subproject, which has an estimated project duration of 98 calendar days and will be implemented by contract, has an updated preliminary project cost of Php 17,279,566.32 with Php 13,823,653.05 (80%) to be funded by INREMP and Php 3,455,913.26 (20%) as LGU equity.
39. Aside from the equity counterpart provided by the LGU of Claveria for the subproject, it has also allocated amount intended for the preparation of the subproject such as seminars, preparation of feasibility study (or subproject proposal document) and detailed engineering, survey of the project site and evaluation by the personnel from different sectors who are involved in the planning and implementation of the subproject.
40. Breakdown of cost estimates is presented in Table 3.
Table 3: Breakdown of Cost Estimates LGU INREMP A. Breakdo of Total Dire t Cost COUNTERPART ate ials , , . , , . , , . La o , . , . , . E uip e t I lude Fuel & Lu i a t Oil , , . , . , , . Re tal , . , . , . su ‐total , , . B. Breakdo of I dire t Cost Co t a to 's P ofit CP % Of D , . , . , , . O e head, Co ti ge ies, Mis ela eous OCM % of D , , . , . , , . VAT [ % of D + CP + OCM ] , . , . , . su ‐total , , .9 C. MUNICIPAL TAX , . , . , . D. GRAND TOTAL A + B + C TOTAL PROJECT COST , , . , , . , 9, .
12
5. Project Duration and Schedule
41. After the INREMP had equipped the proponent with necessary technical knowledge, the LGU-SPMU started with the finalization of the Subproject Proposal Document (SPD). The SPD preparation has been completed and reviewed by the regional review team and the consultant. As the SPD preparation and review commence, the DED is simultaneously prepared by the Municipal Engineering Office and is expected to be final and complete at the time of approval. The DED shall then be translated into a Bidding Document once SPD is approved by the council. Procurement period should take three (3) months to comply with the ADB procurement guidelines. Imperatively, subproject is expected to be awarded in July 2019.
42. The implementation of the proposed subproject is expected to be completed within at least 98 calendar days. Other details are presented in Table 4.
Table 4: Implementation Schedule