DOCSLIB.ORG

Special Planning Control Committee Bullington Cross Wind Farm 13

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Special Planning Control Committee Bullington Cross Wind Farm 13 Special Planning Control Committee Bullington Cross Wind Farm 13/00800/FUL, 13/0046/FUL(B&DBC) & 13/00753/FULLN (TVBC) Update Sheet Monday 16 th June 2014 The information set out in this Update Sheet includes details relating to public speaking and any change in circumstances and/or additional information received after the agenda was published. 1 Ref No Address Recommendation Item No 1 13/00800/FUL, Proposed Bullington Cross Wind REFUSE 13/00046/FUL( Farm Site, Norton, Sutton Scotney, B&DBC) Hampshire 13/00753/FULL N (TVBC) Agenda Page: Officer Presenting: Dave Dimon Public Speaking Objectors: Darcy Ladd – Chilbolton Observatory Graham & Jackie Hensman Christopher Napier – CPRE Douglas Paterson – Keep Hampshire Green Philip Dowson – Dever Society Eva Butler – Tufton Warren Martin Leay & Anthony Fortescue – Tesbourne Estate Gerald Smith (possibly Suzanne Church) – Popham Airfield Parish Council representatives: Lucy Dowson - Wonston PC Anne Peal or June Perins – South Wonston PC Cllr Annabel Smyth-Osbourne – Bullington PC Ward Councillor: Cllr Malcolm Wright (WCC Wonston & Micheldever) Cllr Tom Thacker (County Councillor – BDBC) Cllr Paula Baker (BDBC) Cllr Stephen Godfrey (WCC Wonston & Micheldever) Cllr Ian Tilbury (BDBC Laverstoke & Steventon) Cllr Mark Williams (BDBC Hurstbourne & Prior) Cllr Caroline Jolly (BDBC Laverstoke & Freefolk) Supporters: Jeremy James Heath-Caldwell Martin Heath – Hampshire Renewable Energy Co-op Helen Jones Tanya Rahman Alan Walker Patrick Geraets Applicant: Darren Cumming and Ernie Shelton - EDF 2 Update (Section 4) Public Consultation Process TVBC REPRESENTATIONS The application received a large number of representations in the form of emails, letters and also a petition. The representations were made both in support of and objecting to the proposed development. A petition was received that was signed by 3081 people. It stated the following: “I, the undersigned, would like to register my strong objection to the proposed Bullington Cross and Woodmancott wind farm developments in Hampshire. This is due to the concerns of air safety in the area of intense Micro light activity and intense military aircraft. There are great dangers of mid-air collisions or engine failure on take-off, due to the excessive height of the 415ft wind turbines”. 1232 letters and emails – Objection: This sentence was used as the basis for a significant number of the letters. Additional comments were then added in many cases. “As someone who values the countryside I object to the proposed wind farm near Bullington Cross because these moving industrial structures will spoil the tranquillity and scenic beauty of the Hampshire Countryside.” Comments relating to construction and operational issues: • Access impact and traffic danger/distraction for drivers on A303/A34 • Physical impact of development including access and equipment and connection 1 to the grid • Noise and disruption during construction and decommissioning • Danger to aviation –military and light aircraft/microlights Interference with radar or TV/radio/telecom signals • Industrial activity on agricultural land • There are better ways of making small amounts of electricity • Many countries are rethinking their approach to wind and no longer investing • What about the energy involved in commissioning/decommissioning Environmental Issues • Adverse impact on local amenity due to size and design – visually intrusive and harms the tranquil landscape character • Detracts from wider landscape character including AONB • Impact of low frequency noise and vibration when in operation • Adverse impact on users of footpaths, PROWs and bridleways • Harmful to archaeology and heritage assets including Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas • Need to value the countryside as there are very few spaces with unencumbered views • Not enough wind Impact on people • Shadow flicker effect from moving blades and impact of warning lights • Effect of low frequency noise and vibration on people • Evidence is mounting that ETSU-R-97 is insufficient to protect residents and noise • Proximity to dwellings – 2km separation distance required between turbines and houses Ecological Issues • Adverse impact on birds as a result of birdstrike, loss of habitat, disturbance and ability to hunt • Impact on bats as a result of barotrauma, inability to navigate around the turbines • Adverse impact on plant species • Loss of habitat • Impact on birds breeding sites Other Matters • Proposal is subsidy driven – only viable due to Government subsidy and then puts up energy costs • Inefficiency of wind turbines – only work 25% of the time • Harmful to local businesses/tourism in the area • Devalue properties • The manufacturing and construction processes creates more carbon dioxide than is saved through use of the turbines 1312 letters and emails Support: 2 A significant number of the representations were in the form of an email stating the following; “I fully support the wind farm at Bullington Cross. It should also be partially owned for the benefit of the local community.” Additional and/or separate comments were then added to many of the emails and the reasons for support were: • Helps to meet Government and/or Hampshire green energy obligations. • Reduces carbon dioxide emissions and better than nuclear or fracking • Should include element of local community ownership • Wind turbines are interesting features in the landscape • Quiet, modern and efficient way of generating clean, renewable energy • Not in an ecologically sensitive area • Should visit France and Germany to see how many wind farms have been built – they may enhance the views • Land based wind power has the potential to create local jobs and improve local power resilience • Noise emissions are insignificant compared to the road noise from A34 and A303 • The local wildlife is more at risk from climate change than it is from the installation of wind power Additional representations received since the publication of the main agenda report: Test Valley Support 196 Object 1 Total for Test Valley Support 1312 Object 1232 + 3081 petition WCC Support 31 Object 1 Total for WCC 3 Support 1816 Object 1359 + 3081 petition (Section 5) Consultation Responses BDBC Para 5.41 main papers – additional Tree Officer comments Satisfactory arrangements shown for Freefolk wood. If approving would want conditions to secure 15m buffer for Freefolk wood and an additional condition demonstrating acceptable buffers or working methods to protect other trees / hedgerows. TVBC CONSULTATIONS The following consultation response from the TVBC Conservation Officer was omitted from the main agenda report and is set out below: Design and Conservation – Object The proposed development by virtue of its design, scale and location would fail to preserve the architectural and historic setting of designated heritage assets within Test Valley. The closest and most affect ed designated heritage assets are Firgo Farm (Grade II), Bullington House (Grade II), St. Michaels Church, Lower Bullington (Grade II*), Barton Stacey Conservation Area and Tidbury Ring (SAM). The proposed development would have an adverse impact on their settings which are an aspect of their significance. As such the proposals do not comply with S.66 and S.72 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 or with policy ENV17 of the Test Valley Borough Local Plan and are contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework. The proposal is for an array of 14 wind turbines to be sited on land at Bullington Cross, where the boundaries to Test Valley Borough Council, Basingstoke and Dean Borough Council and Winchester City Co uncil converge. The part of the site within Test Valley would encompass 3 of the wind turbines, with the remainder lying within the boundaries of the two neighbouring local authorities. These proposed wind turbines are likely to be visible from numerous l ocations within Test Valley due to the topography of the site (with land levels approximately 90 to 110m above sea level) and by virtue of the overall height 4 of the wind turbines (overall height of 126.25m as measured from the ground to the rotor blade) , which as a result of their size and form, with large rotating blades, represent industrial scaled moving features incongruous to this part of Hampshire, where there are known heritage assets (Schedule Ancient Monuments, Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas). The submitted Environmental Statement produced by PMSS has identified a ‘Zone of Theoretical Visibility’ based on the site’s topography and the maximum height of the wind turbine (to blade tip height) calculated to encompass an area up to 30km f rom the site. However, for the purposes of assessing the visual impact the proposed wind farm would have on the setting of those designated heritage assets that fall within the Zone of Theoretical Visibility a 5km radius from the project site has been dete rmined (following advice from English Heritage) should be the parameter for assessments of impact. The assessment undertaken by PMSS follows well established methodologies, as set out in guidance produced by English Heritage, for ranking the significance of heritage assets and the setting of the asset. With respect to those designated heritage assets that lie within Test Valley and would be situated within 5km distance of the proposed site these would include Tidbury Ring (Schedule Ancient Monument), the Grade I Listed Building Church of St Nicholas’s in Longparish, the Grade II* Listed Buildings of St
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Barton Stacey Conservation Area Character Appraisal 1 Introduction
    Barton Stacey Conservation Area Character Appraisal 1 Introduction Conservation Areas A conservation area is an area designated by the local planning authority as one of special architectural or historic interest. Once designated, the local authority has a duty1 to ensure that the character of a conservation area is preserved or enhanced, particularly when considering applications for development. Purpose of Character Appraisals Local authorities are encouraged to prepare Character Appraisals, providing detailed assessments of their conservation areas. Appraisals enable the local authority to understand the elements that give each area its distinct and unique character, identifying special qualities and highlighting features of particular signifi cance. Those elements include: historic development; landscape and topography; style, type and form of the buildings, and the spaces between buildings; materials, textures, colours and detailing; and less tangible aspects, such as sounds and smells, which can contribute to the special character of the area. A Character Appraisal is intended as an overview, providing a framework within which individual planning applications can be assessed. It includes text, an appraisal plan and photographs. It is not realistic to refer to every building or feature within a conservation area – but the omission of any part does not mean that it is without signifi cance. 1 Under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. 2 2 The Barton Stacey Conservation Area Context Barton Stacey Conservation Area was originally designated on 25th April 1984 in recognition of its special architectural and historic interest. Local authorities have a duty to periodically review their conservation areas to ensure that they are still relevant and that boundaries are logical and could be defended if a planning appeal were made.
    [Show full text]
  • Royston Bishop Died of Wounds 16 November 1916 Age 25 Years
    Royston Bishop died of wounds 16 November 1916 age 25 years Royston Bishop was born on 24 November 1892 in Whitchurch, Hampshire. He was called Royston because this was his mother’s maiden name. He went to school at Popham and Woodmancott National Church of England School. His father Henry, who was also born in Whitchurch, was living in Dummer in 1911. His occupation was listed as a farmer of a smallholding. He had previously been head gamekeeper living at Manor Farm in Woodmancott. Royston’s mother was Hannah Maria, known as Annie. She was born in Cardiff, Wales. Royston had two younger sisters: Ruby who was born in Whitchurch in 1894 and Annie who was born in Dummer in 1908. When Royston enlisted on 14th April 1915 he was described as single, a gamekeeper, age 23 years and 6 months, and 5ft 7½ inches tall. He was initially enlisted in the 5th Battalion King’s Royal Rifles, R/ 11817. He was subsequently posted to the 1st Battalion when he left Southampton for Le Havre on the 4th August 1916 and reposted to the 13th Battalion almost immediately, in the field. He was a qualified Vickers and Lewis Gunner. On 29th October 1915, before he was posted abroad, he married Bertha Mary Sainsbury. Bertha’s father Robert was a carpenter and joiner living in Dummer. In 1901 the Sainsbury family were living in Down Street. On the 15th November 1916, during the Battle of the Ancre, Royston suffered gunshot wounds to the shoulder and groin, dying of his wounds the following day.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vington. 4 Miles. Awbridge. 15 Miles. Baddesley (North). Wmiles
    1913] A VINGTON AND AWBRIDGE DIRECTORY. 325 Emmence, C., Buildings farm Hillier, W., farmer Johnson, H., Ashley farm Hurst, F. (post office), builder and Kimber, H. (assistant- overseer), contractor Stock bridge Hurst, J. W., Danes farm Lawrence, W. E., Forest farm J udd, Francis, dealer, Coles farm Pile, G. (head gamekeeper) Lever, S., Banksia Verrier, J ., bee keeper and farmer Mills, E., schoolmistress • Moody, G., dealer, the Hollies A vington. 4 miles. Moody, Miss 1., the Bungalow (Post Town-Alresford.) Nutbeam, H., Red cottage, Danes-rd. Population, 232, Olden, George, farmer Shelley,Capt.Sir John C. E., Bart.,J.P. Olden, W., farmer Osmond, Rev. P. H., M.A., Rectory Preston, - police constable • Adderley, Capt. E., Home farm Roles, Mrs., Corona cottage Shelley, H ubert, Lovington farm Sillence, G., farmer Shelley, Percy Bysshe , Spare, Mrs., shopkeeper Beasley, H., painter Styles, 1. Danes road Bowers, W., dairyman and manager, Warwick, G. E., farmer A vington Park dairy Wools, F., cycle engineer Hall, Richard, parish clerk Wools, W. S., blacksmith & shopkpr. Harnett, W., gardener Harper, Mrs., Post office Baddesley (North). wmiles. Norris, H., carpenter, Sawmills Padwick, C. H., farm manager, See North Baddesley. Avington farm Samways, Miss, schoolmistress Barton Stacey. 8 miles. Sims, Mrs., dressmaker Postal Address-S.O., Hants. Overseers-Sir J. Shelley & J. Tanner Population, 528. Cockrane, G. Awbridge. 15 miles. Franklin, Rev. A. C., vicar (Post Town-Romsey.) Frazer, C. H. De Horsey, Admiral, Bochurst, Gardiner, H. J., Moody's down Awbridge Heath, Mrs. Hansard, H. L., Stanbridge hall Hodgson, R. K., Gravelacre Hargrave, Rev. A. B., M.A., Incum- Judd, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Micheldever Parish COVID-19 Response Update Friday 3Rd July 2020
    MICHELDEVER PARISH COUNCIL Chairman: W Helen, Sunset Farm, Northbrook, Micheldever SO21 3AJ. Telephone: (01962) 774805 Clerk: Jocelyn Jenkins, 34 Ganger Farm Way, Ampfield, Romsey, Hants SO51 0DG Telephone: (01794) 368951 Web – micheldeverparish.org.uk E-M: [email protected] [ Micheldever Parish COVID-19 Response Update Friday 3rd July 2020 Key Contacts Parish Council – COIVD-19 Co-Ordinator, Cllr. Andrew Adams – [email protected] / 07738 699622 Parish Council Clerk Jocelyn Jenkins – [email protected] Parish Response Group • Parish Response Group formed incorporating key stakeholders / community support coordinators / businesses – WhatsApp group and digital meetings. • Next Parish Response Group Meeting – Friday 3rd July, 5pm – to confirm arrangements in place for next step of lifting restrictions on 4th July. Link - https://us02web.zoom.us/j/317471999 / Dial-In - 0203 051 2874 / Meeting ID - 317 471 999 City / County Council Support / National Updates • Updates cascaded to residents via Micheldever Village and Micheldever Station Facebook Groups / Notice Boards / Parish Response Group / local support groups. • Solent LEP support hub with advice for local businesses. • Winchester City Council have circulated advice for businesses. WCC Business Helpline – 01962 814915 or see website for details. • Support for ‘shielded’ households to continue to 31st July. Those in this position should be registered via government website and known to HCC / WCC. Full guidance here. HCC ‘Hantshelp4vulnerable’ help-line – 0333 3704000 [9am-5pm daily] will continue indefinitely as first point of contact for those with support needs. • Government advice on safely helping others with daily needs. • Citizens Advice offering help / sign-posting towards support – 01962 848003 / 01489 890940 / [email protected] / citizensadvicewinchester.org.uk • A number of grants are available to support organisations and individuals – a useful list of can be found here.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer.Doc Revised from 10/03/02
    Save No. 91 Printed 10/03/02 10:33 AM Gazetteer.doc Revised From 10/03/02 Gazetteer compiled by E J Wiseman Abbots Ann SU 3243 Bighton Lane Watercress Beds SU 5933 Abbotstone Down SU 5836 Bishop's Dyke SU 3405 Acres Down SU 2709 Bishopstoke SU 4619 Alice Holt Forest SU 8042 Bishops Sutton Watercress Beds SU 6031 Allbrook SU 4521 Bisterne SU 1400 Allington Lane Gravel Pit SU 4717 Bitterne (Southampton) SU 4413 Alresford Watercress Beds SU 5833 Bitterne Park (Southampton) SU 4414 Alresford Pond SU 5933 Black Bush SU 2515 Amberwood Inclosure SU 2013 Blackbushe Airfield SU 8059 Amery Farm Estate (Alton) SU 7240 Black Dam (Basingstoke) SU 6552 Ampfield SU 4023 Black Gutter Bottom SU 2016 Andover Airfield SU 3245 Blackmoor SU 7733 Anton valley SU 3740 Blackmoor Golf Course SU 7734 Arlebury Lake SU 5732 Black Point (Hayling Island) SZ 7599 Ashlett Creek SU 4603 Blashford Lakes SU 1507 Ashlett Mill Pond SU 4603 Blendworth SU 7113 Ashley Farm (Stockbridge) SU 3730 Bordon SU 8035 Ashley Manor (Stockbridge) SU 3830 Bossington SU 3331 Ashley Walk SU 2014 Botley Wood SU 5410 Ashley Warren SU 4956 Bourley Reservoir SU 8250 Ashmansworth SU 4157 Boveridge SU 0714 Ashurst SU 3310 Braishfield SU 3725 Ash Vale Gravel Pit SU 8853 Brambridge SU 4622 Avington SU 5332 Bramley Camp SU 6559 Avon Castle SU 1303 Bramshaw Wood SU 2516 Avon Causeway SZ 1497 Bramshill (Warren Heath) SU 7759 Avon Tyrrell SZ 1499 Bramshill Common SU 7562 Backley Plain SU 2106 Bramshill Police College Lake SU 7560 Baddesley Common SU 3921 Bramshill Rubbish Tip SU 7561 Badnam Creek (River
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of the Romano-British Population in The
    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS 119 THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE ROMANO - BRITISH POPULATION IN THE BASINGSTOKE AREA. By SHIMON APPLEBAUM, BXITT., D.PHIL. HE district round Basingstoke offers itself as the subject for a study of Romano-British . population development and. Tdistribution because Basingstoke Museum contains a singu­ larly complete collection of finds made in this area over a long period of years, and preserved by Mr. G. W. Willis. A number of the finds made are recorded by him and J. R. Ellaway in the Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club (Vol. XV, 245 ff.). The known sites in the district were considerably multiplied by the field-work of S. E. Winbolt, who recorded them in the Proceedings of the same Society.1 I must express my indebtedness to Mr. G. W. Willis, F.S.A., Hon. Curator of Basingstoke Museum, for his courtesy and assist­ ance in affording access to the collection for the purposes of this study, which is part of a broader work on the Romano-British rural system.2 The area from which the bulk of the collection comes is limited on the north by the edge of the London Clay between Kingsclere and Odiham ; its east boundary is approximately that, of the east limit of the Eastern Hampshire High Chalk Region' southward to Alton. The south boundary crosses that region through Wilvelrod, Brown Candover and Micheldever, with outlying sites to the south at Micheldever Wood and Lanham Down (between Bighton and Wield). The western limit, equally arbitrary, falls along the line from Micheldever through Overton to Kingsclere.
    [Show full text]
  • Winchester District Local Plan Part 1 – Joint Core Strategy
    Part of the Winchester district development framework Winchester District Local Plan Part 1 – Joint Core Strategy Pre-submission December 2011 1.0 Introduction and Background ..................................................................1 The Winchester District Local Plan Part 1 – Joint Core Strategy Preparation and Consultation ............................................................................................3 Winchester District Community Strategy ........................................................4 Sustainability Appraisal, Strategic Environmental Assessment, Habitats Regulations Assessment and Equalities Impact Assessment ........................6 Other Plans and Strategies ............................................................................7 Statutory Compliance Requirements..............................................................9 Policy Framework.........................................................................................10 2.0 Profile of Winchester District .................................................................11 Winchester Town..........................................................................................14 South Hampshire Urban Areas.....................................................................15 Market Towns and Rural Area......................................................................16 Spatial Planning Vision.................................................................................18 Spatial Planning Objectives..........................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • 'A WANT of GOOD FEELING' a Reassessment of the Economic and Political Causes of the Rural Unrest in Hampshire, 1830
    Proc. Hampsh. Field Club Archaeol. Soc. 43, 1987, 237-254 'A WANT OF GOOD FEELING' A Reassessment of the Economic and Political Causes of the Rural Unrest in Hampshire, 1830 By BETHANIE AFTON ABSTRACT tension resulted in widespread unrest in Southern England. It began in June with an This article analyses the early nineteenth century arson attack in Kent. From there it spread, agrarian community in Hampshire at a moment of slowly at first, until, by December, few coun- crisis: the riots of 1830. The traditional relationships ties south of the Humber were left unaffected. within the community were put under pressure by a Hampshire, where the actual rioting lasted combination of post-war depression, overpopulation only ten days, from the 17th of November until and the introduction of new ideas and techniques. The the 26th, was one of the most severely affected resultant economic distress felt by a major part of counties (see Figs 1-2). On the 19th and 20th society, the small farmers, traders, craftsmen, and, of November a large mob from several parishes most of all, agricultural labourers, was ignited by roamed between Sutton Scotney and East political tension into an open, widespread revolt. The Stratton extorting money for food and beer, more modem industrial and* commercial attitudes from breaking agricultural machinery, and outside Hampshire were threatening traditional assaulting those who refused their requests. authority and subservience. The revolt was an early, On the 20th, Taskers Waterloo Iron Foundry tentative step out of the essentially rural community at Upper Clatford was severely damaged by a into modem industrial society.
    [Show full text]
  • 1891 Census Transcription Barton Stacey Parish RG12 Piece 962, Folios 18-28 (Covering 21 Pages of Census Images)
    1891 Census for Barton Stacey Parish. 1 Please report errors and additional information Transcribed by Anne Harrison. Copyright Barton Stacey Parish Local History Group, 2013. to [email protected] 1891 census transcription Barton Stacey parish RG12 Piece 962, folios 18-28 (covering 21 pages of census images). HD head of household, WI wife, S son, D daughter, StepD step-daughter, BR brother, SI sister, GS/GD grandson/daughter, GF/GM grandfather/mother, FA father, MO mother, NI niece, NE nephew, AU aunt, UN uncle, SL/DL/BL/SiL/FL/ML/ son/ daughter/ brother/ sister/ father/ mother-in-law. SE servant, BO boarder, LO lodger, VI visitor, HK housekeeper. M married, S single, W widow(er). Note: we have transcribed as faithfully as possible the original writing of the enumerator. Sometimes this has been difficult and where there is any doubt we have made this clear. Note that the areas of the parish (column 2) are added from our knowledge of the parish Sch Area of parish Address Forename(s) Surname Rel'p Marital Age Occupation Employer, County of Town of birth Notes added by the Barton Stacey Parish Local History edul This was sometimes to Status in employed or birth Group e abbreviated by the HD 1891 neither [box enumerator to fit it into left blank = none of these. the alloted space. 1 Barton Stacey Manor Farm H. John P. WILTSHIRE HD M 27 Farm Bailiff employed Wilts. Chippenham 1 Sarah M. WILTSHIRE WI M 37 Hants. Barton Stacey 1 John B. WILTSHIRE S 2 Hants. Barton Stacey 1 Ethel M.
    [Show full text]
  • Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990
    WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL DECISIONS MADE BY HEAD OF DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT IN WINCHESTER DISTRICT, PARISH, TOWN AND WARD UP TO 17 June 2018 Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990 DECISIONS MADE BY HEAD OF DEVELOPMENT UNDER DELEGATED POWERS UP TO 17 June 2018 For Guidance 1. Please note that if you wish to view the full decision details, which include any conditions or reasons for refusal, these can be accessed via the public access facility within the planning area of the council’s web site. The following link will take you to the relevant area where the case can be accessed using the quoted case number on the below list and clicking the ‘associated documents’ tab and searching the documents list for ‘decision’. Similarly the case officer’s report can be viewed in the case of delegated decisions, which explains the considerations taken into account in determining the application. Planning Applications Online Please note that there is a slight delay between the date that a decision is made and the date the decision notice is displayed on the website. The decision notice will be published to the website 2 days after the date of the decision. 2. Reports and minutes of applications determined by the planning committee can be viewed in the committees section of the council’s web site, which can be accessed via the following link. Planning Development Control Committee If you require any further information, please enquire at Planning Reception, City Offices, Colebrook Street, Winchester, SO23 9LJ quoting the Case Number.
    [Show full text]
  • Rec 24.09.17
    Town and Country Planning Acts 1990 Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Area) Act 1990 LIST OF NEW PLANNING AND OTHER APPLICATIONS, RECEIVED AND VALID IN PARISH/TOWN WARD ORDER WEEKLY LIST AS AT 24 September 2017 For Guidance 1 Those applications which have a star by them are FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. Please see over for a list and description of application types. 2 If the Grid Reference is blank, this is because it is a property which is in the process of being entered on the Property Database for the District. 3 The Conservation Area only appears where the application is known to be in a Conservation Area . 4 Where the application has not been allocated to a case officer, “Team Manager “ for the relevant area appears instead. 5 The Publicity Period is 21 days after the Site Notice Date or 21 days after a Press Advert date, where this has been made, whichever is the later. Applications may be determined after this date. If you require any further information, please enquire at Main Reception, City Offices, Colebrook Street, Winchester, SO23 9LJ quoting the Case Number. We will then be able to give you the current status of the application. We are open Monday to Thursday 8.30am - 5.00pm, Fridays 8.30am - 4.30pm, excluding Bank and Public Holidays. Page 1 APPLICATION CODES AND DESCRIPTION AVC Full Advert Consent AVT Temporary Advert Consent (non-standard time limit) AGA Agricultural Application APN Agricultural Prior Notification CER Certificate of Alternative Use CHU Change of Use DEC Demolition Consultation EUC Established
    [Show full text]
  • NAME Newton Stacey PARISH Barton Stacey HUNDRED Barton Stacey DISTRICT Test Valley NGR SU 412406 GEOLOGY Valley Gravel Islands Surrounded by Upper Chalk
    NAME Newton Stacey PARISH Barton Stacey HUNDRED Barton Stacey DISTRICT Test Valley NGR SU 412406 GEOLOGY Valley gravel islands surrounded by Upper chalk. The NW road runs on Valley gravel. SITE CONTEXT The 'cross roads' where the small lane which was formerly the main street meets the Barton Stacey-Chilbolton road is at 50m OD and is at the head of a small valley in which a small stream flows NW to join the River Dever. The valley sides rise gently either side of the 'main street' to about 60m OD. Manor Fm at the S of the settlement lies at about 55m OD. PLAN TYPE & DESCRIPTION Regular/Irregular row? The earthworks along the NE side of the road through the settlement require further investigation before classification can be made. The site of the chapel is not known. AREAS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL The area along both sides of the lane leading to the NW along which there are earthworks representing the sites of former houses is an AHAP. This area also covers the manor and the existing buildings near the cross-roads as well as a short part of the lane where it turns to the NE to cover the area where a complex of buildings stood in the C19. On the SE side of the cross-roads there is a small AAP to cover the possibility that settlement extended beyond the junction. The field within the E angle of the junction is under arable cultivation and so there are no surviving earthworks. CHURCH & CHURCHYARD No church. There was a chapel here but the site is unknown.
    [Show full text]