Tenants, Tenures and Transfers: the Landholding Experience of Rural

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tenants, Tenures and Transfers: the Landholding Experience of Rural Tenants, Tenures and Transfers: the landholding experience of rural customary tenants in some Hampshire downland manors, 1645-1705 Submitted by Juliet Dorothy Gayton to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History In June 2013 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University Signature: ………………………………………………………….. i Abstract This thesis examines the impact of different customary manorial tenures on the land transfer activities of rural tenants between 1645 and 1705. The study of land transfer has formed part of the attempt by historians to establish how and why England developed from family-based subsistence farming into large-scale commercialised agriculture before many of its Continental neighbours. A key element in any study of land transfer is the property rights of those undertaking the transfers. England had a variety of customary tenures, and little research has focussed on how they operated and impacted on rural tenant transfer behaviour in the early modern period. This study uses evidence from eight manors in Hampshire with four different types of tenure to explore how they affected what land transfer options the tenants had, and how transfers were used to further family and economic objectives. The types of tenure were copyhold of inheritance; copyhold for three lives; copyhold for three lives where the first could act alone; and a form of customary freehold. The main documentary sources are manorial records augmented by parish, probate, survey and taxation material. The tenurial and landholding structure of the manors is established for 1645 using the Cromwellian Parliamentary Surveys of confiscated ecclesiastical estates. The analysis of subsequent tenant land transfers through to 1705 then examines their volume and any correlation with prices and population movements. The permanent transfers of death/inheritance and the inter vivos land market are analysed to assess the extent to which tenants were attached still to family, or taking part in an active extra-familial investment and sales market; and whether this led to changes over time in farm holding size and distribution. The temporary transfers of sub-letting of land and sub-tenure of dwellings are then analysed. The latter has not been studied before, and uses the Hearth Tax returns to compare occupiers of dwellings with formal tenants. Finally a detailed study of mortgages is made. Previous studies of the use of land as collateral for a mortgage loan have often overlooked the rural tenant as a participant in the credit market, and changes in the laws of usury at the end of the sixteenth century produced a significant uptake of mortgaging in the seventeenth, which makes this study timely. The research reveals that the tenants were very active with their transfers, but that the way in which they were active was determined by tenure. Those with copyhold of inheritance tenure had many options including inheritance, sale, mortgaging, sub-letting, splitting holdings, and conditional surrenders to provide for old age or several children. Those with copyhold for lives were restricted to after-death transfers, shuffling of reversion lives, or sub-letting. However, they adapted, and while Inheritance-tenured tenants adopted mortgages with enthusiasm, Lives tenants sub-let on a large scale. Both thereby acquired financial support from their lands, so that although the land-family bond was not absent, the bond was strongest in terms of using the land as an economic asset. The sub-letting of dwellings enabled Lives tenants to accommodate a landless workforce, where their tenure prevented the splitting of parcels for sale as manorial smallholdings. Aggressive accumulation of land was largely absent, and purchasers of land and mortgage lenders were overwhelmingly local. Some polarisation of holding size was found, but sub-tenure meant that actual farmed units were probably very different. It is concluded that differences in tenure significantly shaped the transfer behaviour of the tenants, so that any future research involving customary tenants must take tenure into account. However, their economic ambitions were found to be similar whichever tenure they had, so that they had to take different means to the same end. ii List of Contents Summary Page Title Page with declaration i Abstract ii List of contents summary iii List of chapter sub-contents iv List of Figures viii List of Tables ix List of Annexes xii Abbreviations xiii Acknowledgements xiv Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Sources and methodology 35 Chapter 3 The manors of study: their tenures and customs 55 Chapter 4 The manors and their customary tenants in 1645 75 Chapter 5 Permanent transfers of land and dwellings 97 Chapter 6 Temporary transfers : The sub-letting of land 171 Chapter 7 Temporary transfers : The sub-letting of dwellings 195 Chapter 8 Temporary transfers : The use of land in mortgages 213 Chapter 9 Conclusions 253 Annexes 269 Bibliography 279 iii List of Chapter sub-contents Page Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.0. Introduction 1 1.1. Tenants and tenures 2 1.1.1. Development of the tenures 3 1.1.2. Geographical distribution of the tenures 6 1.1.3. Security of tenure and the lords 7 1.1.4. Comparative studies 10 1.2. Land transfer 11 1.2.1 The development of transfer options 13 1.2.2 Inheritance and the family attachment to land 15 1.2.3. The size of holdings and farms 17 1.2.4. Land transfer in the rural economy 21 1.3. External pressures: prices, population, enclosure and politics 25 1.4. Temporary transfers - subleasing 28 1.5. Temporary transfers - mortgages 30 1.6. Hampshire 32 1.7. Plan of the thesis 33 Chapter 2 Sources and methodology 35 2.0 Introduction 35 2.1. The selection of manors 35 2.2 Sources 39 2.2.1 Manorial Court Rolls, Court Books and Presentment registers 40 2.2.2 Estate Management records 42 2.2.4 Surveys : Parliamentary, Manorial, Enclosure and Tithe. 45 2.2.5 Customs 48 2.2.6 Taxation returns – the Hearth Tax 50 2.2.7. Records of individuals – parish registers 51 2.2.8 Probate Records 52 2.2.9 Diaries and Letters 54 Chapter 3 The manors of study: their tenures and customs 55 3.0. Introduction 55 3.1. Distribution of tenures in the manors 58 3.2 The tenures : Lordship 58 3.2.1. The Bishop and the Dean and Chapter 59 3.2.2. The Winchester College manors 62 3.2.2.1. Meonstoke lordship 62 3.2.2.2. Vernham Dean lordship 63 3.3. The tenures : Leasehold 64 3.4. Freehold tenures 66 3.5. The tenures : Customary tenures 67 3.5.1. Copyhold for three lives 67 iv List of chapter sub-contents 3.5.2. Copyhold for 3 lives, but with rights for the first life to act alone 68 3.5.3. Copyhold of inheritance 68 3.5.4. Customary freehold 69 3.6. Rectories 69 3.7. Women, widows and minors 70 3.8 Rights, Appurtenances, and Orders 71 3.9. Heriots, rents and fines, and licences 72 3.10. Forfeits 73 3.11. Conclusions 74 Chapter 4 The manors and their customary tenants in 1645 75 4.0. Introduction 75 4.1. Tenant holding size profiles 76 4.2. Female tenants 80 4.3. Enclosure 81 4.4. Rents, Fines and Heriots 84 4.4.1. Rents 88 4.4.2. Heriots 92 4.4.3. Fines 92 4.5. Transfer costs 93 Chapter 5 Permanent transfers of land and dwellings 97 5.0. Introduction 97 5.1. Types of transfer available to customary tenants 98 5.2. Overall pattern of all permanent transfers 1645-1705 100 5.3. Permanent transfers and relationship to prices 104 5.4. Turnover 107 5.5. Numbers of transfers per tenant 112 5.6. Death/Inheritance transfers : all manors 114 5.6.1. Heirs and inheritors 117 5.6.2. Addition of the next new life in Lives manors 120 5.6.3. Death of a reversioner life 123 5.7. Inter vivos permanent transfers in all manors 124 5.7.1. New grants 127 5.7.2. Splits and finishes of holdings 127 5.7.3. Forfeits 128 5.7.4. Surrenders and exchanges inter vivos 129 5.8. Types of transfer and motivation for inter vivos surrenders in 133 Inheritance manors 5.8.1. Familial and extra-familial surrenders in manors with inheritance tenure 133 5.8.2. Entails 134 5.8.3. Conditional surrenders in manors of inheritance tenure 136 5.8.4. Inter vivos surrenders to family in Inheritance manors 137 v List of chapter sub-contents 5.8.5. Inter vivos surrenders to unrelated persons in Inheritance manors 139 5.8.6. Motivation of ‘Sellers’ in Inheritance manors 141 5.8.7. Motivation of ‘purchasers’ in Inheritance manors 142 5.9. Inter Vivos transfers – in the manors with lives tenure 144 5.9.1 Motives for giving and receiving surrenders and exchanges in Lives manors 147 5.9.2. ‘Purchasers’ of lives 151 5.10. The Baker Family: a case study of the influence of tenure on transfer behaviour. 155 5.11. Outcomes of the permanent transfers 159 5.11.1. How far holdings remained in the same family 159 5.11.2. Residency in the manors 160 5.11.3. Changes in the size of holdings 162 5.12.
Recommended publications
  • Barton Stacey Conservation Area Character Appraisal 1 Introduction
    Barton Stacey Conservation Area Character Appraisal 1 Introduction Conservation Areas A conservation area is an area designated by the local planning authority as one of special architectural or historic interest. Once designated, the local authority has a duty1 to ensure that the character of a conservation area is preserved or enhanced, particularly when considering applications for development. Purpose of Character Appraisals Local authorities are encouraged to prepare Character Appraisals, providing detailed assessments of their conservation areas. Appraisals enable the local authority to understand the elements that give each area its distinct and unique character, identifying special qualities and highlighting features of particular signifi cance. Those elements include: historic development; landscape and topography; style, type and form of the buildings, and the spaces between buildings; materials, textures, colours and detailing; and less tangible aspects, such as sounds and smells, which can contribute to the special character of the area. A Character Appraisal is intended as an overview, providing a framework within which individual planning applications can be assessed. It includes text, an appraisal plan and photographs. It is not realistic to refer to every building or feature within a conservation area – but the omission of any part does not mean that it is without signifi cance. 1 Under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. 2 2 The Barton Stacey Conservation Area Context Barton Stacey Conservation Area was originally designated on 25th April 1984 in recognition of its special architectural and historic interest. Local authorities have a duty to periodically review their conservation areas to ensure that they are still relevant and that boundaries are logical and could be defended if a planning appeal were made.
    [Show full text]
  • St Martin's Church East Woodhay Index, Catalogue and Condition Of
    ST MARTIN’S CHURCH EAST WOODHAY INDEX, CATALOGUE AND CONDITION OF MEMORIAL AND OTHER INSCRIPTIONS 1546-2007 Prepared by Graham Heald East Woodhay Local History Society 2008 Developed from the 1987 Catalogue prepared by A C Colpus, P W Cooper and G G Cooper Hampshire Genealogical Society An electronic copy of this document is available on the Church website www.hantsweb.gov.uk/stmartinschurch First issue: June 2005 Updated and minor corrections: February 2008 St Martin’s Church, East Woodhay Index, Catalogue and Condition of Memorial Inscriptions, 1546 - 2007 CONTENTS Page Abbreviations 1 Plan of Memorial Locations 2 Index 3 Catalogue of Inscriptions and Condition Churchyard, Zone A 11 Churchyard, Zone B 12 Churchyard, Zone C 15 Churchyard, Zone D 28 Churchyard, Zone E 29 Churchyard, Zone F 39 Churchyard, Zone G 43 Church, East Window 45 Church, North Wall (NW) 45 Church, South Wall (SW) 48 Church, West Wall (WW) 50 Church, Central Aisle (CA) 50 Church, South Aisle (SA) 50 Pulpit, Organ and Porch 51 Memorials located out of position (M) 51 Memorials previously recorded but not located (X) 52 The Stained Glass Windows of St Martin’s Church 53 St Martin’s Church, East Woodhay Index, Catalogue and Condition of Memorial Inscriptions, 1546 - 2007 ABBREVIATIONS Form of Memorial CH Cross over Headstone CP Cross over Plinth DFS Double Footstone DHS Double Headstone FS Footstone HS Headstone K Kerb (no inscription) Kerb KR Kerb and Rail (no inscription) PC Prostrate Cross Plinth Slab Slab (typically 2000mm x 1000mm) SS Small Slab (typically 500mm
    [Show full text]
  • Black House Farm, Hinton Ampner, Hampshire February 2018
    Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment in Advance of the Proposed development of Land at Black House Farm, Hinton Ampner, Hampshire February 2018 Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment in Advance of the Proposed development of land at Black House Farm, Hinton Ampner, Hampshire. Report for Nadim Khatter Date of Report: 20th February 2018 SWAT ARCHAEOLOGY Swale and Thames Archaeological Survey Company School Farm Oast, Graveney Road Faversham, Kent ME13 8UP Tel; 01795 532548 or 07885 700 112 www.swatarchaeology.co.uk Black House Farm, Hinton Ampner, Hampshire Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Project Background ......................................................................................... 4 1.2 The Site ............................................................................................................ 4 1.3 The Proposed Development............................................................................ 4 1.4 Project Constraints .......................................................................................... 5 1.5 Scope of Document ......................................................................................... 5 2 PLANNING BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 5 2.2
    [Show full text]
  • Week Ending 12Th February 2010
    TEST VALLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL – PLANNING SERVICES _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WEEKLY LIST OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS : NO. 06 Week Ending: 12th February 2010 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Comments on any of these matters should be forwarded IN WRITING (including fax and email) to arrive before the expiry date shown in the second to last column For the Northern Area to: For the Southern Area to: Head of Planning Head of Planning Beech Hurst Council Offices Weyhill Road Duttons Road ANDOVER SP10 3AJ ROMSEY SO51 8XG In accordance with the provisions of the Local Government (Access to Information Act) 1985, any representations received may be open to public inspection. You may view applications and submit comments on-line – go to www.testvalley.gov.uk APPLICATION NO./ PROPOSAL LOCATION APPLICANT CASE OFFICER/ PREVIOUS REGISTRATION PUBLICITY APPLICA- TIONS DATE EXPIRY DATE 10/00166/FULLN Erection of two replacement 33 And 34 Andover Road, Red Mr & Mrs S Brown Jnr Mrs Lucy Miranda YES 08.02.2010 dwellings together with Post Bridge, Andover, And Mr R Brown Page ABBOTTS ANN garaging and replacement Hampshire SP11 8BU 12.03.2010 and resiting of entrance gates 10/00248/VARN Variation of condition 21 of 11 Elder Crescent, Andover, Mr David Harman Miss Sarah Barter 10.02.2010 TVN.06928 - To allow garage Hampshire, SP10 3XY 05.03.2010 ABBOTTS ANN to be used for storage room
    [Show full text]
  • Candidates in the New Upper Meon Valley Ward
    Caring and campaigning for our community WINCHESTER CITY COUNCIL ELECTIONS MAY 5TH Your priorities are our priorities We will be accessible, approachable and visible in your local 1 communities, listening to you, championing your concerns. We will continue to work with your parish and county councillors, 2 and with the local MP, to achieve the best outcomes on issues in CANDIDATES IN THE NEW the new Upper Meon Valley ward. We will work to ensure that flood management and prevention is UPPER MEON VALLEY WARD 3 given the highest priority by the County and City authorities. We will work to conserve and enhance the landscape and 4 character, to develop the green infrastructure of our beautiful LAURENCE RUFFELL AMBER THACKER villages, and to protect and enhance the habitats of our wild species. Michael Lane for Police Commissioner My priority will always be to keep technology & intelligence to stay you and your family safe. My ahead of criminals and free up policing plan and budget will police time for front-line work. empower the Chief Constable My military background, business and our police to do what they do experience and community service best – prevent crime and catch as a Councillor, all equip me to criminals. bring the necessary leadership to I will spare no effort to ensure we take the tough decisions that will are efficient and focussed on what be needed. matters most to communities. I am asking for your support to I will drive improvement in I have been a Winchester City Councillor for This year has been an exciting and fulfilling GCA 167 Stoke Road, Gosport, PO12 1SE PO12 Gosport, Road, Stoke 167 GCA Promoted by Alan Scard on behalf of Michael Lane of of Lane Michael of behalf on Scard Alan by Promoted make Hampshire safer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bridge Feb Mar V2
    The Bridge ~ February 2021 - March 2021 The Magazine for the Meon Bridge Benefice of Droxford, Exton, Meonstoke & Corhampton with Preshaw www.bridgechurches.org.uk THE BRIDGE MAGAZINE TEAM Contents Editor: Ian Gilchrist 07785 951063 List of Advertisers 4 Michael Moody is off to Dorset 17 [email protected] Rev Tony Forrest, On Reflection 5 Thank you Droxford churchyard 17 Advertising: David Neale 878541 Streamed Church Services 6 clearers [email protected] Christmas tree raises £1,125 7 The Meon Hall Report 18 Corhampton Saxon Church Droxford Village Hall News 19 Treasurer: Diana Arthur 877390 celebrations continue 8 District Councillor’s Report 20 Meonstoke and Newtown schools to A drone’s eye view of Droxford 21 Artwork by: link up? 9 Justine Greenfield 07748 827763 Make new friends with U3A 22 i-DEASIGN 07891 149866 Living the Dream 10-11 Meon Valley Lions news 22 Singer Frank Turner remembers his Poachers caught 23 Proof Reading: James Morrice Meonstoke childhood 12-13 Our snowman has a name 23 Care Group and Neighbourhood Thank You from The Roberts Centre Printing: Sarum Graphics support 13 01722 324733 24 In the Garden 14 Another stunning recipe from Droxford Fire Station News 15 Wilfrid’s Café 25 Our wonderful deliverers: Meon Valley Food Bank’s Useful phone numbers 26 Lorna and Ian Allured, Veronica Magnificent Christmas Appeal 16 Attrill, Jill Austin, Pauline Bone, Phil & Chrissie Butler, Liz Callegari, Well, the new-style Bridge with its glossy pages and full colour seems to have gone Hannah Carpenter, Janine Casey, down well. Thank you to all who expressed their appreciation.
    [Show full text]
  • ABBOTTS ANN PARISH COUNCIL Newsletter: November 2008
    ABBOTTS ANN PARISH COUNCIL Newsletter: November 2008 LEST WE FORGET There is so much to remember in November, but it must be wise for us to have a kind of annual audit of shared and personal memories. Some of us will never forget the tremendous impact in the 1930s of the whole of London stopping dead at 11 o’clock every November 11th with buses at a standstill, shops falling silent, pedestrians standing hatless on the pavements, and even the cycling errand-boys hushing their whistling. There are interesting signs that after the casual attitudes of recent years a more thoughtful approach to remembrance is emerging, even as those with direct experience of war are dwindling in numbers. So, while our heads are whirling with the bewildering complications of the Megashed saga, there is a danger that we will forget that the old airfield, which, after all, is only a few yards from our Parish boundary, is a site of major importance in the history of air warfare. Starting off in 1917 as a base for the Royal Flying Corps, built mainly by German prisoners-of-war, the station was first occupied by the No. 2 School of Navigation and Bomb-dropping. This set the pattern for 60 years of vital work, mainly in the fields of training and research, including the first form of electronic navigation (Radio Direction Finding), which, in principle, is still in use. Between the wars it hosted the RAF Staff College (which did not finally move away until 1970) and numerous experimental and training units.
    [Show full text]
  • You Are Duly Summoned to Attend
    UPPER CLATFORD PARISH COUNCIL MINUTES FROM THE MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY 11TH MARCH 2020 AT 7.30 PM IN THE KING EDWARD VII MEMORIAL HALL Present: Parish Cllrs P Heslop (Chairman), R Bennett, D Coole, C C Eyre, H Folkard-Tapp, S Kennedy, A Lockhart, C Williams, TVBC Cllr M Flood Minutes: C Emmett Parish Clerk 1. Apologies for Absence Cllr A Gibson, Cllr N Shah, Cllr Wilson 2. To receive and accept declarations of interest Nil 3. Public Participation 1 x Observing Cllr from TVBC attended . 4. To approve the minutes of the Parish Council Meeting held on 13th February 2020 Following an amendment had been made to remove Cllr Flood form the list of attendees, Cllrs approved the minutes. The Chairman signed to signify approval. 5. To receive the Clerk’s progress report since the meeting held on 13th February 2020 Jan 20 - 13.2.a. Amend Commons Registration. Ongoing Clk Jan 20 - 17.2. Illuminated Speed Warning sign – order. Quotes sought. Order placed 19/2 Complete Item 6. Watery Lane – Potential Unauthorised Use. Contact S Water regarding planning status of the field. Complete. Planning authority not required 6. Watery Lane – Potential Unauthorised Use. Confirm what TPOs exist in the area. Email to TVBC 18/2 Pending 7. NDP. Circulate NDP package from DJN on receipt and print copy of Consultation Statement for Cllr SK. Complete 7. NDP Budget. Adjust budget to reflect funding line of £2338.00. Complete 8. TVBC Cllr Grant. Prep grant request for Speed Indicator Device and advise UCYFC of possible grant for defibrillator if requested.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Churches of the Test Valley
    to know. to has everything you need you everything has The Test Valley Visitor Guide Visitor Valley Test The 01264 324320 01264 Office Tourist Andover residents alike. residents Tourist Office 01794 512987 512987 01794 Office Tourist Romsey of the Borough’s greatest assets for visitors and and visitors for assets greatest Borough’s the of villages and surrounding countryside, these are one one are these countryside, surrounding and villages ensure visitors are made welcome to any of them. of any to welcome made are visitors ensure of churches, and other historic buildings. Together with the attractive attractive the with Together buildings. historic other and churches, of date list of ALL churches and can offer contact telephone numbers, to to numbers, telephone contact offer can and churches ALL of list date with Bryan Beggs, to share the uniqueness of our beautiful collection collection beautiful our of uniqueness the share to Beggs, Bryan with be locked. The Tourist Offices in Romsey and Andover hold an up to to up an hold Andover and Romsey in Offices Tourist The locked. be This leaflet has been put together by Test Valley Borough Council Council Borough Valley Test by together put been has leaflet This church description. Where an is shown, this indicates the church may may church the indicates this shown, is an Where description. church L wide range of information to help you enjoy your stay in Test Valley. Valley. Test in stay your enjoy you help to information of range wide every day. Where restrictions apply, an is indicated at the end of the the of end the at indicated is an apply, restrictions Where day.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risks in the Littleton and Harestock Area
    Flood Risks in the Littleton & Harestock Area (Ver 1.0 dated 9 Jan 2020) FLOOD RISKS IN THE LITTLETON AND HARESTOCK AREA Purpose of presentation This purpose of this short presentation is to provide the residents of Littleton and Harestock with a general introduction to the subjects of local flood risks, flood resilience and Parish Council planning for flooding. Parish Council Notes: • The summary information presented here was oBtained from Government, National, Local Authority, Charities and local organisation sources. • Online links are provided for Littleton and Harestock residents to oBtain further information aBout flood risks, flood resilience and planning for flooding. • If you want more information aBout how the Parish Council will act during a flood event, please contact the LHPC Clerk (01962 886507) who will direct you to the appropriate LHPC councillor. • Littleton residents, with a property at risk from flooding, should take professional advice about flood resilience measures and ensure their insurance provides adequate cover. Contents Why are the Littleton and Harestock communities at risk from flooding? Where does it flood in Littleton? Monitoring the groundwater flood risk. Flooding and planning applications. Littleton flood relief schemes. Littleton and Harestock Parish Council (LHPC) Flood Plan. Advice to Littleton and Harestock residents about flooding. Community recovery after flooding. Page 1 of 9 Flood Risks in the Littleton & Harestock Area (Ver 1.0 dated 9 Jan 2020) Why are the Littleton and Harestock communities at risk from floodinG? The Littleton and Harestock areas are located approximately 100-60 metres above sea level. The nearest river (River Itchen), is about 4 kilometres East and is around 20-50 metres lower than Littleton and Harestock, therefore, river flooding is unlikely.
    [Show full text]
  • Landowner Deposits Register
    Register of Landowner Deposits under Highways Act 1980 and Commons Act 2006 The first part of this register contains entries for all CA16 combined deposits received since 1st October 2013, and these all have scanned copies of the deposits attached. The second part of the register lists entries for deposits made before 1st October 2013, all made under section 31(6) of the Highways Act 1980. There are a large number of these, and the only details given here currently are the name of the land, the parish and the date of the deposit. We will be adding fuller details and scanned documents to these entries over time. List of deposits made - last update 12 January 2017 CA16 Combined Deposits Deposit Reference: 44 - Land at Froyle (The Mrs Bootle-Wilbrahams Will Trust) Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/countryside/Deposit44-Bootle-WilbrahamsTrustLand-Froyle-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Crispin Mahony of Savills on behalf of The Parish: Froyle Mrs Bootle-WilbrahamWill Trust, c/o Savills (UK) Froyle Jewry Chambers,44 Jewry Street, Winchester Alton Hampshire Hampshire SO23 8RW GU34 4DD Date of Statement: 14/11/2016 Grid Reference: 733.416 Deposit Reference: 98 - Tower Hill, Dummer Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/rightsofway/Deposit98-LandatTowerHill-Dummer-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Jamie Adams & Madeline Hutton Parish: Dummer 65 Elm Bank Gardens, Up Street Barnes, Dummer London Basingstoke SW13 0NX RG25 2AL Date of Statement: 27/08/2014 Grid Reference: 583. 458 Deposit Reference:
    [Show full text]
  • Community Planning in Winchester
    Legend Parish Outlines Work in Progress ± Plans Completed Micheldever Wonston Northington South Wonston Old Alresford Bighton Crawley Kings Worthy Itchen Stoke and Littleton Ovington and Headbourne New Itchen Valley Harestock Worthy Alresford Sparsholt Bishops Sutton Winchester City see inset Tichborne Chilcomb Badger Farm Cheriton Bramdean and Hinton Ampner Olivers Battery Hursley Kilmeston Compton and Shawford Twyford Beauworth West Meon Owslebury Warnford Otterbourne Colden Common Exton Upham Corhampton and Meonstoke Bishops Waltham Droxford Durley Hambledon Swanmore Winchester City Area Soberton Shedfield Harestock Curdridge St Barnabas Ward Abbots Barton Denmead St Bartholomew Ward Wickham Winnall St Paul Ward Boarhunt Whiteley Newlands Southwick and Widley Highcliffe St Luke Stanmore Ward St Michaels Ward Soberton Updated 05/12/2011 Upham Updated 23/12/2014 Swanmore and Shedfield updated 16/08/2011 Denmead Updated 24/04/2015 Itchen Valley updated 22/02/2012 Abbots Barton Added 24/04/2015 Kings Worthy Updated 16/04/2012 Droxford Updated 15/09/2015 Winnall Updated 04/05/2012 Durley Updated 15/09/2015 Chilcomb Updated 22/05/2012 Wonston updated 15/09/2015 Northington and Upham updated 09/10/2012 Sparsholt added 25/01/2016 COMMUNITY PLANNING IN WINCHESTER Hambledon Updated 22/01/2013 Twyford added 01/07/2016 Durley and Wonston Updated 18/03/2013 Shedfield completed 04/04/2016 Durley and Wonston Updated 18/03/2013 Highcliffe completed 10/06/2016 St Barnabas and HarestockUpdated 06/04/2013 Kilmeston added 10/06/2016 © Crown copyright and database rights Owslebury updated 06/04/2013 Hursley added 06/06/2017 Northington updated 31/07/2013 Bishops Sutton updated 27/09/2019 Winchester City Council license 100019531 Highcliffe added 19/08/2013 Ollivers Battery completed 27/09/2019 2020.
    [Show full text]