DOCSLIB.ORG

Pinchukartcentre Presents “The Forbidden Image”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pinchukartcentre Presents “The Forbidden Image” PinchukArtCentre Presents “The Forbidden Image” June 28, 2019 - January 5, 2020 Open Tuesday through Sunday from 12:00 until 21:00 Free Admission Kyiv, Ukraine, June 26, 2019 The PinchukArtCentre (Kyiv, Ukraine) presents “The Forbidden Image”, a two-chapter project in the framework of the PinchukArtCentre’s Research Platform. The first chapter presents a solo exhibition by Boris Mikhailov, while the second entitled “Crossing Lines” is dedicated to the Kharkiv School of Photography and the continuation of its attitude and thinking with emerging artists. Both exhibitions draw upon three major themes that challenge the notion of The Forbidden Image: an image that lies beyond the boundaries (The nude, The performative), a “life-drunk” image of society (New humanism), and an intimate image that “flutters at night” (Personal romantics). The exhibition by Boris Mikhailov is a homecoming show offering a view on his oeuvre, from photography to conceptual art and performativity. Mikhailov’s work moves along the edges of political and social norms and tests the limits of what the project addresses as “The Forbidden Image”. This title stresses the personal engagement and risks implied by the early practice of Mikhailov and his keen sense of critical thinking through the image itself, allowing an expanded understanding of reality. The exhibition underscores his position as a leader and a thinker. The exhibition premieres two new films by David Teboul, who followed Boris Mikhailov, collecting 40 hours of video material. “Tea, Coffee, Cappuccino” (13 minutes) addresses the question of the documentary’s essential place in the artist’s work. “I was here” (1.55 hours) is a portrait of the artist, wherein he describes the emotions his photographs arouse in him. It reveals Mikhailov’s taste for incompletion, irony, and his liking for play. The films engage with the works of Mikhailov throughout the exhibition. The second chapter “Crossing lines” presents a curated view on the Kharkiv School of Photography, enabling an understanding of both context and time. Starting in the late ‘70s in a city of engineers a band of young photographers got together and called themselves “Vremja” (time). The exhibition explores these artists, who looked at the world that was crumbling around them, discovering a space for experiment in terms of content, technique and form. The exhibition concentrates on a precise selection of artists from the first and second generations of the Kharkiv School following the curatorial idea of the Forbidden image. Participating artists: Andrey Avdeenko, Sergey Bratkov, Victor & Sergey Kochetov, Pavlo Makov, Oleg Malyovany, Yevgeniy Pavlov, Misha Pedan, Roman Pyatkovka, Juri Rupin, Sergey Solonsky, Oleksandr Suprun and Alina Kleytman, Sasha Kurmaz, Sergey Melnitchenko, Mykola Ridnyi. This exhibition demonstrates consistent interest and significant investment of PinchukArtCentre’s Research Platform in the Kharkiv School of Photography, both as a historical phenomenon and as a school that continues to produce amazing artists. “Crossing lines” is a show wherein for the first time the PinchukArtCentre brings together a select group of artists it will continue to research and from whom it expects to see more detailed solo exhibitions in the years to come. Curators – Björn Geldhof, Artistic director of the PinchukArtCentre; Martin Kiefer, in charge of Contemporary Art at the Musée du Louvre, Paris; Alicia Knock, curator, Contemporary and Research Department, Centre Pompidou, Paris. A special thanks goes out to Suzanne Tarasiève for supporting the realization of the Boris Mikhailov exhibition. PinchukArtCentre The PinchukArtCentre was founded in September 2006 by businessman and philanthropist Victor Pinchuk. It is one the largest and most dynamic private contemporary art centres in Central and Eastern Europe. With over 3 million visitors, the PinchukArtCentre has become an international hub for contemporary art, developing the Ukrainian art scene while generating critical public discourse for society as a whole. For more than a decade, the PinchukArtCentre has provided free access to new ideas, perceptions and emotions. Its exhibition program investigates national identity in the context of international challenges. It engages the public in a dynamic dialogue through a full range of educational and discursive events. In 2016, the PinchukArtCentre launched Research Platform as a pioneering project that aims to generate a living archive of Ukrainian art from the early 1980s through to the present. The research is regularly shared with the public through exhibitions, publications, and discussions. Simultaneously, the PinchukArtCentre invests in the next generation though the Future Generation Art Prize and the PinchukArtCentre Prize, awards for young contemporary artists aged 35 or younger. These prizes have made the institution a leading centre for the best emerging artists worldwide while empowering a new generation in Ukraine. The PinchukArtCentre is located in Kyiv’s historic architectural complex in the Besarabka area, which underwent a major renovation in the beginning of the 21st century. The interior architecture for the centre was developed by the French architect Philippe Chiambaretta. Currently, the PinchukArtCentre occupies six floors with exhibition spaces on four floors, library, education room, book store, video-lounge and café. The total exhibition space amounts to more than 3000 sq. meters. Official website: pinchukartcentre.org Contact details for Media Enquiries: Tel.: +38 044 494-1148, [email protected] General Enquiries: Tel.: +38 044 590-0858, [email protected] PinchukArtCentre 1/3-2, "А" Block, Velyka Vasylkivska/Baseyna Str., Kyiv, Ukraine 01004 Tel.: +380 44 590 08 58 E-mail: [email protected] Opening hours: Tuesday through Sunday from 12:00 until 21:00 Closed Monday Admission is free. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Despite Sanctions, International Trade with Crimea Continues
    #11 is coming on September 30 Ukraine's customs st 21 Subscribe Year to Kyiv Post online. :::.<,93267&20 vol. 21, issue 36 www.kyivpost.com September 2, 2016 Forbidden Trade Despite Sanctions, International Trade with Crimea Continues An aerial view of the seaport in Russian-occupied Sevastopol on Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula. Despite Western sanctions, the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project has found that European ships continue to do business in the Crimean ports. (Courtesy) Editor’s Note: The following After Russian troops occupied the Yet more than 600 vessels have What makes it easier for them named General flew the blue-and- report by the Organized Crime and Crimean peninsula two years ago, entered Crimean ports in the past is that to date, Ukraine has not yellow flag of the Republic of Palau as Corruption Reporting Project, a Kyiv the Kyiv government moved to block two years, and OCCRP research prosecuted a single vessel owner or it passed through the Bosphorus, the Post partner, was written by Oleksandr trade at all commercial ports—a indicates both Western and Middle captain. channel linking the Sea of Marmara Humeniuk, Maksym Kytsiuk, Olena move that was later supported by the Eastern businesspeople continue to to the Black Sea at Istanbul. Loginova and Andrii Ianitskyi. European Union, the United States trade with Crimea, in violation of the Ghost ships and other countries. policies of their own countries. In early December 2015, a vessel more Crimea on page 10 National 2, 3, 9 – 11 Business 6 – 8 Follow the Kyiv Post on CURRENCY WATCH Facebook at Opinion 4, 5 Lifestyle 12 – 14 www.facebook.com/ KyivPost, and on Twitter Hr 26.2 to $1 Inside: Employment/Real Estate/Classifieds 15 at @KyivPost.
    [Show full text]
  • Temptation to Control
    PrESS frEEDOM IN UKRAINE : TEMPTATION TO CONTROL ////////////////// REPORT BY JEAN-FRANÇOIS JULLIARD AND ELSA VIDAL ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// AUGUST 2010 /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// PRESS FREEDOM: REPORT OF FACT-FINDING VISIT TO UKRAINE ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 2 Natalia Negrey / public action at Mykhaylivska Square in Kiev in November of 2009 Many journalists, free speech organisations and opposition parliamentarians are concerned to see the government becoming more and more remote and impenetrable. During a public meeting on 20 July between Reporters Without Borders and members of the Ukrainian parliament’s Committee of Enquiry into Freedom of Expression, parliamentarian Andrei Shevchenko deplored not only the increase in press freedom violations but also, and above all, the disturbing and challenging lack of reaction from the government. The data gathered by the organisation in the course of its monitoring of Ukraine confirms that there has been a significant increase in reports of press freedom violations since Viktor Yanukovych’s election as president in February. LEGISlaTIVE ISSUES The government’s desire to control journalists is reflected in the legislative domain. Reporters Without Borders visited Ukraine from 19 to 21 July in order to accomplish The Commission for Establishing Freedom the first part of an evaluation of the press freedom situation. of Expression, which was attached to the presi- It met national and local media representatives, members of press freedom dent’s office, was dissolved without explanation NGOs (Stop Censorship, Telekritika, SNUJ and IMI), ruling party and opposition parliamentarians and representatives of the prosecutor-general’s office. on 2 April by a decree posted on the president’s At the end of this initial visit, Reporters Without Borders gave a news conference website on 9 April.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 437.68 Kb
    1 September 2007, N°49 Board of Trustees Co-Chairs CrisisWatch: Christopher Patten summarises briefly developments during the previous month in some 70 situations of current or potential Thomas Pickering conflict, listed alphabetically by region, providing references and links to more detailed information President and CEO sources (all references mentioned are hyperlinked in the electronic version of this bulletin); Gareth Evans assesses whether the overall situation in each case has, during the previous month, significantly deteriorated, significantly improved, or on balance remained more or less unchanged; Executive Committee alerts readers to situations where, in the coming month, there is a particular risk of new or significantly Cheryl Carolus escalated conflict, or a particular conflict resolution opportunity (noting that in some instances there may Maria Livanos Cattaui* in fact be both); and Yoichi Funabashi summarises Crisis Group’s reports and briefing papers that have been published in the last month. Frank Giustra Stephen Solarz CrisisWatch is compiled by Crisis Group’s Brussels Research Unit, drawing on multiple sources including George Soros the resources of some 130 staff members across five continents, who already report on nearly 60 of the Pär Stenbäck situations listed here. Comments and suggestions can be sent to [email protected]. *Vice-Chair To search past issues of CrisisWatch visit our databases and resources page at www.crisisgroup.org. Morton Abramowitz Adnan Abu-Odeh Kenneth Adelman August 2007
    [Show full text]
  • Yalta European Strategy Turns Into ‘Old Boys’ Club of Ex-‘Elite’ Taras Kuzio Writes That the Importance of YES Annual Summit Is by Far Overestimated
    OP-ED, 8 October 2009 Yalta European Strategy turns into ‘old boys’ club of ex-‘elite’ Taras Kuzio writes that the importance of YES annual summit is by far overestimated. I have never been invited to Victor Pinchuk’s annual “old boys” get-together in Yalta and if I was invited I would not go. No, I am not envious of those who get a free holiday in Yalta and are able to use rooms where the big statesmen sat in 1945 to decide the future of Europe. Pinchuk is, by far, the most intelligent of Ukraine’s oligarchs (can one still call them thus?) and began his self-rehabilitation near the end of the administration of his father-in-law, Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma. He invited U.S. VIP’s to Ukraine, such as Henry Kissinger and ex-President George H.W. Bush. He also began to put funding into Ukrainian projects in Washington D.C., one of which (at the Petersen Institute of International Economics) led to Anders Aslund’s book on how Ukraine became a market economy and democracy. I purchased a copy of the second printed edition. The first had been destroyed after Ukrainian billionaire Dmytro Firtash used Britain’s strident libel laws to demand a retraction of claims in the book on his links to RosUkrEnergo, the shadowy gas intermediary that imported Russian and Central Asian natural gas until recently. It was, indeed, ironic that Firtash had a legal quarrel with the best Western friend of Ukraine’s oligarchs. But maybe times change, as now Aslund is a supporter of Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko (see his interview in Ukrainska Pravda, Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Generation Art Prize Venice 2017 ENG 2
    Press Release Date of issue: April 3, 2017 FUTURE GENERATION ART PRIZE @ VENICE 2017 Collateral Event of the 57th International Art Exhibition – La Biennale di Venezia PinchukArtCentre and Victor Pinchuk Foundation will present an exhibition at the Biennale Arte 2017 of the work of 21 young artists from 16 different countries, shortlisted for the 4th edition of The Future Generation Art Prize, the global art prize for artists up to 35. The exhibition is an official Collateral Event of the 57th International Art Exhibition – La Biennale di Venezia. It will be on view in the spectacular setting of the Palazzo Contarini Polignac from 12 May to 13 August 2017. The Future Generation Art Prize is widely acknowledged as a springboard for emerging talent. Lynette Yiadom Boakye won the Prize in 2012, before going on to be shortlisted for the Turner Prize and have a highly successful solo show at the Serpentine Gallery in London. The winner of the first edition of the Prize, Cinthia Marcelle, will represent Brazil at the 57th International Art Exhibition. The 21 artists on show this year in Venice, chosen from amongst 4,500 entries, include among others the winner of the $100,000 Future Generation Art Prize 2017, the South African artist Dineo Seshee Bopape, and the winner of the $20,000 Special Prize, Kenyan/British artist Phoebe Boswell. In addition there will be new work by the other shortlisted artists who are: Njideka Akunyili Crosby, 33 (Nigeria / United States), Iván Argote, 32 (Colombia / France), Firelei Báez, 35 (Dominican Republic / United States), Vivian Caccuri, 30 (Brazil), Sol Calero, 34 (Venezuela / Germany), Asli Çavuşoğlu, 34 (Turkey), Vajiko Chachkhiani, 31 (Georgia / Germany), Carla Chaim, 33 (Brazil), Christian Falsnaes, 35 (Denmark / Germany), EJ Hill, 31 (United States), Andy Holden, 34 (United Kingdom), Li Ran, 30 (China), Ibrahim Mahama, 29 (Ghana), Rebecca Moss, 25 (United Kingdom), Sasha Pirogova, 29 (Russia), Kameelah Janan Rasheed, 31 (United States), Martine Syms, 28 (United States), Kemang Wa Lehulere, 32 (South Africa), Open Group (Ukraine).
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Involvement of Oligarchs' Philanthropy
    Shouldn’t, Wouldn’t, Couldn’t? Analyzing the Involvement of Oligarchs’ Philanthropy Foundations in the Ukrainian Protests of 2013-14 Hanna Söderbaum Uppsala University Abstract: This article analyzes the agency of wealthy businessmen-politicians’ philanthropy foundations during the Ukrainian Maidan protests of 2013-14 in which crowdfunding and grassroots mobilization constituted key distinctive features. As the role of these philanthropy foundations remains obscure, this article aims to bridge this gap in our knowledge of Ukrainian politics and society. The protesters strived to achieve social change and democratization similar to what was being purported by wealthy businessmen-politicians’ foundations during the years leading up to the protests. However, since the protesters specified one particular aim as “de- oligarchization,” the involvement of these organizations is puzzling. What did these foundations do at this critical point? To what extent can their actions or inactions be explained by the institutional and framework constraints of the foundations, the strategies of the wealthy businessmen-politicians behind the foundations, and the lack of the foundations’ legitimacy in the eyes of the civic sector activists? The analysis covers different types of foundation and is based on semi-structured interviews involving the foundations’ representatives, think-and-do tank analysts, and Maidan activists, over the years 2011 to 2017. The findings show that the organizational entities were largely directed by their respective founders. This indicates a dependence of the philanthropic organization on the political affiliation of the founder, rather than on the framed ambition of the foundation. Similar to the impact of philanthropic organizations in other institutional contexts, the impact of philanthropy foundations on the Maidan social movement proved marginal.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisiswatch: July 2007 Trends August 2007 Watchlist
    1 August 2007, N°48 Board of Trustees Co-Chairs CrisisWatch: Christopher Patten Thomas Pickering summarises briefly developments during the previous month in some 70 situations of current or potential conflict, listed alphabetically by region, providing references and links to more detailed information President and CEO sources (all references mentioned are hyperlinked in the electronic version of this bulletin); Gareth Evans assesses whether the overall situation in each case has, during the previous month, significantly deteriorated, significantly improved, or on balance remained more or less unchanged; Executive Committee alerts readers to situations where, in the coming month, there is a particular risk of new or significantly Cheryl Carolus escalated conflict, or a particular conflict resolution opportunity (noting that in some instances there may Maria Livanos Cattaui* in fact be both); and Yoichi Funabashi summarises Crisis Group’s reports and briefing papers that have been published in the last month. Frank Giustra Stephen Solarz CrisisWatch is compiled by Crisis Group’s Brussels Research Unit, drawing on multiple sources including George Soros the resources of some 130 staff members across five continents, who already report on nearly 60 of the Pär Stenbäck situations listed here. Comments and suggestions can be sent to [email protected]. *Vice-Chair To search past issues of CrisisWatch visit our databases and resources page at www.crisisgroup.org. Morton Abramowitz Adnan Abu-Odeh Kenneth Adelman Ersin Arioglu July
    [Show full text]
  • Oligarchs After the Maidan: the Old System in a 'New' Ukraine
    Centre for Eastern Studies NUMBER 162 | 16.02.2015 www.osw.waw.pl Oligarchs After The Maidan: The Old System In A ‘New’ Ukraine Wojciech Konończuk There have been major changes in the balance of forces among the key Ukrainian oligarchs, rep- resentatives of big business with strong political influence, since the victory of the Maidan revo- lution. However, these changes have not undermined the oligarchic system per se. Over the past decade or so, the oligarchs have been key players in Ukrainian politics and economy, and they have retained this position until the present. One of the effects of the change of the government in Kyiv and the war in the Donbas was the elimination of the influence of ‘the family’ – the people from Viktor Yanukovych’s inner circle who formed the most expansive oligarchic group in Ukraine at the time of his presidency. The influence of Rinat Akhmetov, the country’s wealthiest man, has also weakened significantly; Akhmetov was one of the most influential people in Ukraine for more than ten years, partly owing to his close bonds with Yanukovych. Dmytro Firtash’s group has also lost a great deal of its influence since Firtash was arrested in Austria in March 2014. The elimination (‘the family’) or the reduction in influence (Akhmetov and Firtash) of what were until recently the most powerful oligarchic groups has been accompanied over the past few months by an unprecedented increase in the influence of Ihor Kolomoyskyi. The present governor of Dnipropetrovsk oblast has become Ukraine’s most powerful oligarch, and has am- bitions to expand his influence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Ukrainian Oligarchsdownload
    Ukrainian Institute for the Future is an independent analytical center that: • forecasts changes and models possible scenarios for events in Ukraine; • makes a competent assessment of the Ukrainian events; • makes specific recommendations for actions; • offers effective solutions; • offers a platform for discussions on current topics. It is a project of representatives of Ukrainian business, politics and the public sector. Founded in summer 2016. AUTHORS Victor Andrusiv Executive Director of the Ukrainian Institute for the Future, PhD in Political Science, analyst and opinion journalist, author of the book “Change the future” Oleg Ustenko Executive Director of the Bleyzer Foundation, President of Harvard Club of Ukraine alumni association Yurii Romanenko Co-founder of the Ukrainian Institute for the Future, head of the International and Domestic Policy programme, editor-in-chief of the portal Hvylya Ihar Tyshkevich Expert of International and Domestic Politics programme of the Ukrainian Institute for the Future (UIF) © Art-direction D!VANDESIGN © Idea and design INCOGNITA INTRODUCTION. THE BRITISH DISEASE IN UKRAINE Content 05 THEORY AND STRUCTURE OF THE UKRAINIAN OLIGARCHY 06 INFLUENCE OVER ENERGY INDUSTRY 14 INFLUENCE OVER METALLURGY 26 INFLUENCE OVER TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE 38 INFLUENCE OVER MEDIA 50 INFLUENCE OVER POLITICS 62 THREE SCENARIOS FOR THE FUTURE OF THE OLIGARCHS 72 Victor Andrusiv Executive Director of the Ukrainian Institute for the Future, PhD in Political Science, analyst and opinion journalist, author of the book “Change the future” Introduction: the British disease in Ukraine After the fall of the Soviet Union, the starting conditions for economic development in Ukraine were advanta- geous. However, after 27 years of independence, we continue to be the most backward country of the post-Sovi- et bloc.
    [Show full text]
  • Dossier Pinchuk Viktor Mykhailovych, Carreffore Limited, Beneficial Owner
    Pinchuk Viktor Mykhailovych Сategory Close associate Громадянин(-ка) Ukraine Last position Carreffore Limited, Beneficial owner CONNECTIONS TO INDIVIDUALS Name Type of connection Period father in law — Kuchma Leonid Danylovych Administration of President of Ukraine , President of Ukraine 1 CONNECTIONS TO LEGAL ENTITIES Name Type of connection Code Carreffore Limited Beneficial owner Roseador Overseas Properties Beneficial owner Pearl Investments Limited Beneficial owner 03064114 Crestfield Properties Limited Beneficial owner 07282083 Carreffore Limited Beneficial owner 109010 Beneficial owner 1123444 Edmond Enterprises Limited Beneficial owner 172877 Geo Alliance Group Limited Beneficial owner 197288 Geo Alliance Oil-Gas Public Limited DOSSIER: Victor Pinchuk is a Ukrainian businessman, philanthropist, son-in-law ex-President of Ukraine Kuchma Leonid Danylovych. According official biography, born in Kyiv in 1960, he graduate from the Dnipropetrovs’k Metallurgical Institute in 1983. He became a research engineer in pipe production and earned a PhD degree in 1987. In 1990, he founded Interpipe Company on the basis of his patented innovations in pipe design, engineering and production, which were successfully adopted by leading metallurgical factories in the former USSR. In 2007, he founded EastOne Ltd., an international investment advisory company whose portfolio comprises more than 20 businesses and large- scale projects, including Interpipe and assets in Ukraine and internationally in media, oil and gas, ferroalloys and others. In 2012, he opened an IT business incubator in Kyiv, Eastlabs, and the first newly built metallurgical plant in Ukraine for 45 years, a state of the art steel mill that also includes large scale installations of world renowned artist Olafur Eliasson. Mr. Pinchuk served two terms as an elected Member of the Ukrainian Parliament, from 1998 to 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • How Ukraine Became a Market Economy and Democracy Chapter
    ch04_16071_Peterson_Ukraine:ch04_16071_Peterson_Ukraine 8/28/09 5:50 PM Page 93 4 Kuchma’s Stagnation, 1996–99 By the summer of 1996 Leonid Kuchma’s strategic outlook was clouded. He had introduced elementary market economic reform and the national currency, the hryvnia. Although he desired to pursue more privatization, his reformist endeavors had to a large extent been accomplished. After long and hard work, a Ukrainian constitution was finally adopted in June 1996. National integrity seemed safer. But Ukraine’s foreign policy was not set- tled, and no great deed, such as membership of the European Union, was within reach. Kuchma started devoting a lot of time to foreign policy. Polit- ically, he was at his peak, but he had no real vision or major goals to accom- plish. His strategy seemed to have evaporated, and tactics took its place. As so often happens with politicians who have enjoyed early success, Kuchma focused on his own political survival, which took five expres- sions, best summarized as standard divide and rule with limited policy ambitions. First, he checked the power and ambitions of his prime minis- ter. Second, he devoted great efforts to both parliamentary and presiden- tial elections. Third, he played different business and regional groupings against one another. Fourth, he also played different branches of law en- forcement against each other. Fifth, the presidential administration in- creasingly disciplined and controlled media. These were tactics without strategy. This period was not pretty. In 1996– 97 Pavlo Lazarenko was prime minister but acted like a businessman. Deputy Prime Minister Viktor Pynzenyk undertook a brave but hopeless attempt at renewed economic reform for the sake of economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine's Media in the Context of Global Cultural
    UKRAINE’S MEDIA IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL CULTURAL CONVERGENCE MARTA DYCZOK UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO Abstract: This paper reframes conventional views of Ukraine by showing how global trends of cultural and media convergence are influencing its identity. It looks at how the country’s media system developed after independence, particularly television, and how this reveals the ongoing struggle to define what it means to be Ukrainian. Media representations illustrate that three visions coexist: a cosmopolitan, pro-Western one which embraces the forces of globalization; a residual Soviet Ukrainian one that is open to change but has a strong cultural affinity to Russia; and a new/ old Ukrainian identity that draws on deep-rooted local (national) values, which coincide with universal ones such as democracy, with a contemporary flavor and without a Russian dimension. It argues that despite certain unique features caused by “the Russia factor,” the new/old country is also being strongly influenced by globalization through mass media, and is part of larger worldwide trends where identity, values, society, and political practices are in flux.1 kraine became independent when modern globalization went into Uhigh gear.2 Thus the new country with an ancient history has been 1 I am grateful to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Wood- row Wilson International Center for Scholars, and Western Ontario University for funding this research. My thanks also go to members of the Harvard University’s Post-Communist Politics and Economics Workshop, Columbia University’s Ukrainian Program, the Univer- sity of Toronto’s Ukraine Research Group, and anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier drafts.
    [Show full text]