Kenneth Frampton CV
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Glenn Murcutt 2002 Laureate Biography
Glenn Murcutt 2002 Laureate Biography Glenn Murcutt is either one of Australia’s best kept secrets, or one of the world’s most influential architects. Perhaps, both. On the other hand, we should temper “secret” somewhat since he has been the subject of numerous books and magazine articles throughout the world. One of the first definitive works wasGlenn Murcutt Works and Projects by Françoise Fromonot, first published in 1995. In that book, she describes Murcutt as the “first Australian architect whose work has attracted international attention.” His relatively low profile can best be explained by the fact that he works alone, primarily for clients who want houses that are not only environmentally sensitive, but provide privacy and security in a structure that pleases all the senses. In stark contrast to many of his contemporaries, Murcutt has declared, “I am not interested in designing large scale projects. Doing many smaller works provides me with many more opportunities for experimentation. Our building regulations are supposed to prevent the worst; they in fact fail to stop the worst, and at best frustrate the best—they certainly sponsor mediocrity. I’m trying to produce what I call minimal buildings, but buildings that respond to their environment.” “I have had to fight for my architecture. I have fought for it right from the outset because councils have clearly found the work a threat. For many designs I put to council, we either had to resort to a court for the outcome or better, negotiate a satisfactory result, always trying to avoid a compromise. I have had the greatest trouble with planning, building and health department staff, many of whom have backgrounds unrelated to architecture, but offer very conservative judgments in taste and aesthetics.” What manner of man and architect is this who could so openly state his opposition to the people who exercise so much control over what and how things should be built? A look at his colorful family, as well as how and where he was raised is a partial explanation. -
Six Canonical Projects by Rem Koolhaas
5 Six Canonical Projects by Rem Koolhaas has been part of the international avant-garde since the nineteen-seventies and has been named the Pritzker Rem Koolhaas Architecture Prize for the year 2000. This book, which builds on six canonical projects, traces the discursive practice analyse behind the design methods used by Koolhaas and his office + OMA. It uncovers recurring key themes—such as wall, void, tur montage, trajectory, infrastructure, and shape—that have tek structured this design discourse over the span of Koolhaas’s Essays on the History of Ideas oeuvre. The book moves beyond the six core pieces, as well: It explores how these identified thematic design principles archi manifest in other works by Koolhaas as both practical re- Ingrid Böck applications and further elaborations. In addition to Koolhaas’s individual genius, these textual and material layers are accounted for shaping the very context of his work’s relevance. By comparing the design principles with relevant concepts from the architectural Zeitgeist in which OMA has operated, the study moves beyond its specific subject—Rem Koolhaas—and provides novel insight into the broader history of architectural ideas. Ingrid Böck is a researcher at the Institute of Architectural Theory, Art History and Cultural Studies at the Graz Ingrid Böck University of Technology, Austria. “Despite the prominence and notoriety of Rem Koolhaas … there is not a single piece of scholarly writing coming close to the … length, to the intensity, or to the methodological rigor found in the manuscript -
Critical Regionalism: Whatever Happened to Autonomy
fusion-journal.com http://www.fusion-journal.com/issue/004-fusion-the-town-and-the-city/critical-regionalism-whatever-happened-to-autonomy/# Critical Regionalism: Whatever Happened to Autonomy Opening In his most recent take on “critical regionalism,” Kenneth Frampton revisits the dichotomy between centre and periphery. It is not the implied territorial divide that interest Frampton. At issue is how architecture could or should define the periphery in contrast to the hegemonic architecture unfolding in the centre. Frampton’s take is centred on the ways that technological apparatus, under the auspices of capitalism, transform the cities one- dimensionally. From China to wherever else that capital today finds a home for fast accumulation, we witness “the mediagenic impact of spectacular form which is,” Frampton observes, “as much due to the capacity of ‘superstar architects’ to come up with sensational, novel images as to their organizational competence and technical abilities.”[i] For a better understanding of Frampton’s position we need to give attention to the change in the title of his text. Since the rise of postmodernism, Frampton has constantly searched for alternative(s) in the work of architects who sidetrack the post-sixties turn to historical eclecticism and the drive for formal autonomy, to mention two dominant tendencies of the time. As early as the 1980s, Frampton mapped the thematic of “critical regionalism” with phenomenological aspiration for the duality between “national culture” and civilization. [ii] Exploring the early -
World Health Organisation Mondiale Organization De La Santé
WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION MONDIALE ORGANIZATION DE LA SANTÉ THIRTEENTH WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY A13 /AFL /5 3 March 1960 Provisional agenda item 3.18 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH HEADQUARTERS ACCCMMODATION Report by the Director- General 1. In resolutionWHAl2.12,1the Twelfth World Health Assembly decided that there is a need for a headquarters building for WHO and that plans and specifications, together with more precise cost estimates within a maximum limit of Sw.fr. 40 000 000 (US $9 302 326), should be laid before the Thirteenth World Health Assembly. It further decided that the choice ^f a building plan and an architect should be made through international competition, the rules for which, including the value of the prizes to be offered, were to be established by the Executive Board. At the same time it delegated to the Board powers to act on behalf of the Assembly as regards approval of the building site, of the contract arrangements with the Swiss authori- ties, both Federal and Cantonal, and of the contract with the architect. It requested a full report to the Thirteenth World Health Assembly on the status of the building plans and on the financing of the expenditure. Action by Executive Board, twenty- fourth session 2. The Executive Board considered the matter at its twenty- fourth session held in June 1959, and adopted a resolution(EB24.R30)1dealing with those matters delegated to it by the Assembly. The Board approved the rules and programme for the architectural competition and agreed that, for practical reasons, the architectural competition should be limited to a maximum of 15 architects of repute, to be proposed by a committee of architectural experts chosen from various countries. -
It Would Be Hard to Find an Architect Or Historian Who Has Not Read Kenneth Frampton’S Work
It would be hard to find an architect or historian who has not read Kenneth Frampton’s work. Frampton, who has been the Ware Professor of Architecture at the Graduate School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation at Columbia University since 1972, has played a transformative role in the fields of architectural history, theory, and criticism. The question is not whether he has shaped our discipline, but rather how many times he has done so. Frampton co-founded the Institute for Architecture and Urban Studies (IAUS) in New York in 1967. Through the Institute’s public programs and its ambitious publishing agenda— which included the seminal journal Oppositions (1973–84) and an eponymous imprint at MIT Press—Frampton helped advance a critical discourse in which theory played a central role in debates over the practices of architecture and urban design. Many of the themes explored at the IAUS and Oppositions would reappear frequently in Frampton’s work, which synthesized phenomenology and hermeneutics with the critical theory of the Frankfurt School. The Institute published a number of primary texts in English for the first time, and introduced American readers to such figures as Aldo Rossi and Manfredo Tafuri. In 1980, Thames and Hudson published Frampton’s Modern Architecture: A Critical History, and the book quickly became the standard text on the subject. Now in its fourth edition, Modern Architecture expands on the work of pioneering historians like Pevsner and Banham to invest the story of architectural modernism with appropriate complexity. The book is extraordinary in its breadth and in the range of intellectual movements and geographical contexts represented. -
1 Stuttgart Zurich
BUILDINGS TO BE VISITED Contemporary le corbusier Stuttgart Weissenhofsiedlung Houses 13,14 &15 Landesgartenschau Exhibition Hall, 2014 Prof. A. Menges, Tobias Schwinn, J. Knippers + Institute for Computational Design / Institute for Lightweight Structures, 2014 Prof. A. Menges, Jan Knippers Institute of Lightweight Structure Building, 1964 Frei Otto Killesberg Park Tower, 2000 Schlaich, Bergerman and Partners Stuttgart City Library, 2011 Yi Architects Neue Staatsgalerie, 198 James Stirling + Partners Mercedes Benz Museum, 2006 UNStudio Porsche Museum, 2009 Delugan Meissel Centre for Virtual Engineering, 2012 UNStudio Kunstmuseum, 2005 Hascher Jehle Architektur Deportation Memorial at North Station, 2006 R128 House, 1998 Roemerstrasse 128 Werner Sobek Zurich Heidi weber museum University of Zurich Law Library, 2004 Santiago Calatrava University of Zurich / Museum of Natural History, 1926, 2002 Karl Moser, Lecture Hall, Gigon & Guyer ETH Library and Exhibition Hall, 1864 Gustav Zeuner focusTerra, Natural Science Institute, 2009 Holzer Kobler 1 Campus Careum, University of Zurich, 2011 GWJ Architektur Bahnhof Stadelhofen, 1984 Santiago Calatrava Kunsthaus / Kunsthaus Addition, 2012 David Chipperfield Bahnhof Enge, 1927 Otto and Werner Pfister Tamedia Office Building, 2013 Shigeru Ban Allianz Headquarters, 2013 Wiel Arets Architecture Dynamo Metal Workshop, 2008 Phalt Architekten Dolder Grand, 2008 Foster and Partners Freitag Store, 2006 Spillman Eschle Architekten Hallenbad Swimmimg Pool, 1938 Sihlholzi Sports Center & Band Stand, 1929 Robert -
Lausanne UIA 2023 Lausanne U Architecture and Water a Lausanne UIA 2023 Architecture and Water
Lausanne 2023 Architecture and Water Lausanne UIA 2023 Lausanne U Architecture and Water A Lausanne UIA 2023 Architecture and Water Meeting between Lausanne, Geneva and Evian. Back to the source, designing the future. Together. 2 Lausanne UIA 2023 Contents 3 8. Other Requirements Passports & Visas 97 Health and security 97 Contents Letters of support 98 • Mayor of Lausanne, Grégoire Junod 99 • Municipal Cultural Council 100 • State Counselor, Pascal Broulis 101 • State Council 102 • Geneva State 103 • Federal Cultural Office 104 • Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne 105 • Société des Ingénieurs et Architectes 106 • Fédération des Architectes Suisses 107 • Valais State 108 • Mayor of Evian, Marc Francina 109 1. Congress Theme Lausanne UIA 2023 4 • Mayor of Montreux, Laurent Wehrli 110 and Title Architecture and Water • CAUE Haute-Savoie 112 Local architectural Sightseeing 26 • General Navigation Company 113 Organization 28 • Swiss Tourism 114 Contact 29 • Swiss 116 • Fondation CUB 117 2. Congress City The Leman Region 30 • Swiss Engineering 118 Accessibility 42 Public Transportation 44 9. Budget Lausanne UIA 2023 Budget 120 General Navigation Company 46 UIA Financial Guarantee 122 Letters of Financial Guarantee 123 3. Congress Dates and Schedule 48 • City of Lausanne 123 4. Venues 50 • Vaud State 124 5. Accommodation 74 • Geneva State 125 6. Social Venues 78 • Federal Cultural Office 126 • Valais State 128 7. Architectural Tours Introduction 88 • City of Evian 129 White route: Alpine architecture 90 • City of Vevey 130 Green route: Unesco Heritage 92 • City of Montreux 131 Blue route: Housing Laboratory 94 • City of Nyon 132 4 Lausanne UIA 2023 Architecture and Water 5 Lausanne, birthplace of the UIA 1. -
Acts of Symbiosis: a Literary Analysis of the Work of Rogelio Salmona and Alvar Aalto Page 41 Klaske Havik
Montreal Architectural RVolumeeview 4, 2017 http://mar.mcgill.ca/ edited by: Olaf Recktenwald and Athena Christina Syrakoy Montreal Architectural Review ISSN 2368-6952 School of Architecture, McGill University Publisher: McGill University Library McLennan Library Building 3459 rue McTavish Montréal, QC, H3A 0C9 Canada This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International License. Table of Contents MAR Volume 4, 2017 Nature Created? Or, the Gentle Touch of Artificial Snow page 5 Henriette Steiner Seaward: The Sound of Eros and an Athenian Avenue to the Aegean page 21 Phoebe Giannisi (trans. Konstantinos Matsoukas) Acts of Symbiosis: A Literary Analysis of the Work of Rogelio Salmona and Alvar Aalto page 41 Klaske Havik Presenting the Extremely Difficult Past: Günther Domenig’s Documentation Center of the National Socialist Party Rally Grounds, Nuremberg, Germany page 63 Rumiko Handa Montreal Architectural Review Nature Created? Or, the Gentle Touch of Artificial Snow Henriette Steiner University of Copenhagen Abstract This article discusses, on the one hand, a holiday photograph of a ski hill in southern Sweden and, on the other hand, a fictional story set in a similar southern Swedish landscape, the children’s book entitledDen Fräcka Kråkan from 1985 by Ulf Nilsson and Eva Eriksson. I use this discussion to broach wider questions concerning modes of appreciating what has traditionally been termed “nature” in light of the current con- dition of what is often called the Anthropocene. I include an example of how this concept has migrated into landscape architecture theory in the work of the German landscape architect Martin Prominski, thereby raising concerns about the historicism this concept entails and discussing the consequences thereof. -
Photo Booklet Media Text Booklet
ALL MATERIALS ARE FOR PUBLICATION ON OR AFTER MONDAY, APRIL 15, 2002 MEDIA KIT ANNOUNCING THE 2002 PRITZKER ARCHITECTURE PRIZE LAUREATE Photo Booklet The photo booklet contains a photo of Glenn Murcutt and a selection of full color reproductions of his works. This does not represent a complete catalogue of the Laureate’s work, but rather a representative sampling. They are all 200 line screen lithographs printed on high gloss stock. These replace the need for using black & white continuous tone prints. They may be re-photographed using 85 line screens for black & white newspaper reproduction, and they can be re-sized, either 50% larger or smaller with no degradation in the image quality or moire effect. The same holds true for the B&W images in the media text booklet. For color reproduction, you have a choice of digital scanning, requesting color slides or a CD of hi-res images. You may also download image files. We can provide high resolution (1200 dpi) TIFF or EPS files of the images using ZIP or HQX archive formats for uploading directly to your FTP server or via e-mail. Call the Media Office listed below. Media Text Booklet Previous Laureates of the Pritzker Prize ................................................. 2 Media Release Announcing the 2002 Laureate ................................. 3-6 Members of the Pritzker Jury ................................................................... 7 Citation from Pritzker Jury....................................................................... 8 Comments from Individual Jurors ........................................................... 9 About Glenn Murcutt........................................................................ 10-17 Description of Simpson-Lee House .................................................. 17-18 Fact Summary – Chronology of Works, Exhibits, Honors............ 19-22 Drawings and B&W Photographs of Murcutt’s Works .................. 23-28 2002 Ceremony Site – Rome, Italy ................................................ -
A Conversation with Kenneth Frampton
A Conversation with Kenneth Frampton STAN ALLEN AND HAL FOSTER Hal Foster: Our occasion is the recent publication of Labour, Work and Architecture (2002), but we should also look back to Studies in Tectonic Culture (1995) and further back, given its wide readership, to Modern Architecture: A Critical History (1980). Let’s begin with your formation as an architect. Kenneth Frampton: I was trained at the Architectural Association (AA) in London from 1950 to 1956. After that I went into the British Army for two years, which was a ridiculous experience except for basic training. I then went to Israel for a year, which was a positive experience, architecturally speaking, in that it was a simpler country with a basic building technology. Within this limited scope, one was free to do what one wanted. I returned to London and started to work for Douglas Stephen and Partners, a relatively small practice in the City Center. I was an associate of this office until I left for the States in 1965. Foster: Whom did you confront at the AA, in terms of teachers and fellow students? Frampton: My group at the AA is a lost generation in many ways. There were and still are peers of considerable talent, but they’ve had mixed careers. Neave Brown is surely one of them. He has had the long career as a housing architect, but it hasn’t been easy for him. Perhaps the most talented of my generation was Patrick Hodgkinson, who worked briefly with Alvar Aalto as a student, and then for Leslie Martin in Cambridge. -
Johannes Philipp Holachneider Diplom Ingenieur, 1959 Thesis
A HEADQUARTERS FOR THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION IN GENEVA, SWITZERLAND by Johannes Philipp Holachneider Diplom Ingenieur, 1959 Te chnische Ho chschule Karlsruhe/Rhein, Germany SUMIJ3TTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMNT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER IN ARCHITECTURE AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Signature of Author .. A...,....., Certified by ................ 4 Thesis Supervisor Accepted by Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Students Room 14-0551 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Ph: 617.253.2800 MITLibraies Email: [email protected] Document Services http://Iibraries.mit.eduldocs DISCLAIMER OF QUALITY Due to the condition of the original material, there are unavoidable flaws in this reproduction. We have made every effort possible to provide you with the best copy available. If you are dissatisfied with this product and find it unusable, please contact Document Services as soon as possible. Thank you. The images contained in this document are of the best quality available. 2 A B S T R A C T Early in 1960 the World Health Organization, a specialized agency of the United Nations, invited twenty reknowned architects from all over the world to partici- pate in a restricted competition for the design of a new WHO Headquarters building to be erected in Goneva, Switzerland, The program of the competition presented the customary requirement for a modern European administra- tion building of a representative rather than commercial character: namely, the partition into small office cells, all of which must receive direct daylight. The height of the construction was limited to approximately ten stories (131.23 feet) above the ground level. On April 15-18th the entries were judged. -
Book TESE Final.Indb
O CONCURSO INTERNACIONAL DE ARQUITECTURA COMO PROCESSO DE INTERNACIONALIZAÇÃO E INVESTIGAÇÃO NA ARQUITECTURA DE ÁLVARO SIZA VIEIRA E EDUARDO SOUTO DE MOURA DOUTORAMENTO EM ARQUITECTURA ESPECIALIDADE DE TEORIA E PRÁTICA DO PROJECTO PEDRO MIGUEL HERNANDEZ SALVADOR GUILHERME ORIENTADOR Doutor Altino João Magalhães Rocha PROFESSOR AUXILIAR | UNIVERSIDADE DE ÉVORA CO-ORIENTADOR Doutor José Carlos Pereira Lucas Callado PROFESSOR AUXILIAR APOSENTADO | FACULDADE DE ARQUITECTURA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA JÚRI PRESIDENTE Doutor José Manuel Aguiar Portela da Costa PROFESSOR ASSOCIADO | FACULDADE DE ARQUITECTURA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA VOGAIS Doutor Jorge Manuel Fernandes Figueira Ferreira PROFESSOR AUXILIAR | UNIVERSIDADE DE COIMBRA Doutor Nuno Alberto Leite Rodrigues Grande PROFESSOR AUXILIAR | UNIVERSIDADE DE COIMBRA Doutor Altino João Magalhães Rocha PROFESSOR AUXILIAR | UNIVERSIDADE DE ÉVORA Doutor Michel Toussaint Alves Pereira PROFESSOR AUXILIAR | FACULDADE DE ARQUITECTURA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA Doutor Nuno Miguel Feio Ribeiro Mateus PROFESSOR AUXILIAR | FACULDADE DE ARQUITECTURA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA TESE ESPECIALMENTE ELABORADA PARA A OBTENÇÃO DO GRAU DE DOUTOR DOCUMENTO DEFINITIVO | VOLUME I | FEVEREIRO, 2016 Esta tese de doutoramento foi apoiada pela Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia do Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior, do Estado Português, com uma bolsa de investigação com a referência SFRH/BD/45345/2008. Esta tese não foi escrita de acordo com o novo Acordo Ortográfi co da Língua Portuguesa. Figura 001. The winner, ilustração pelo autor (Capa) The winner (Capa) Motivação O interesse pela presente temática emergiu tanto da experiência profi ssional do investigador enquanto arquitecto assim como da constatação da ausência de investigação sobre o tema em Portugal. Entre 2002 e 2007 o autor fez parte do Conselho Directivo Nacional a da Ordem dos Arquitectos com responsabilidades na representação internacional b.