Etyfish Gonorynchifo
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Interrelationships of Fossil and Recent Gonorynchid Fishes with Comments on Two Cretaceous Taxa from Israel
Mesozoic Fishes – Systematics and Paleoecology, G. Arratia & G. Viohl (eds.): pp. 299-318, 14 figs., 2 tabs., 3 apps. © 1996 by Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, Germany – ISBN 3-923871–90-2 The interrelationships of fossil and Recent gonorynchid fishes with comments on two Cretaceous taxa from Israel Terry GRANDE Abstract The interrelationships of fossil and Recent gonorynchid fishes are reviewed. The monophyly of the family is cladistically verified, in part, by caudal skeleton and dentition characters. The family can be divided into two monophyletic clades; one consisting of Gonorynchus and †Notogoneus as sister taxa and the other consisting of †Charitosomus. The systematic placement of two Cretaceous taxa, †Ramallichthys and †Judeichthys, is reviewed. Data indicate that both taxa should be included within the Gonorynchidae, and possibly synonymized with the genus †Charitosomus. Introduction The order Gonorynchiformes consists of a morphologically and ecologically diverse assemblage of fishes (eleven genera and about 50 species) with a widespread geographic distribution; most species are restrict- ed to small geographic areas, and the fossil record for the family Gonorynchidae dates back to the Early Cretaceous (GRANDE 1992). Extant species are found in both marine and freshwater environments of southeast Asia, Africa and the Indo-Pacific, while extinct species have been collected in North and South America, Europe, the Middle East, Mongolia, Australia, and possibly China. Historically, the relationships of the Gonorynchiformes to other teleost groups, and even the composition of the group have been enig- matic. Various gonorynchiform taxa have been included within the Clupeomorpha (BERG 1940), Protacan- thopterygii (GREENWOOD et al. 1966), and most recently, aligned with the Cypriniformes (GAYET 1982). -
Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi
Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 (http://www.accessscience.com/) Article by: Boschung, Herbert Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Gardiner, Brian Linnean Society of London, Burlington House, Piccadilly, London, United Kingdom. Publication year: 2014 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400) Content Morphology Euteleostei Bibliography Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi The most recent group of actinopterygians (rayfin fishes), first appearing in the Upper Triassic (Fig. 1). About 26,840 species are contained within the Teleostei, accounting for more than half of all living vertebrates and over 96% of all living fishes. Teleosts comprise 517 families, of which 69 are extinct, leaving 448 extant families; of these, about 43% have no fossil record. See also: Actinopterygii (/content/actinopterygii/009100); Osteichthyes (/content/osteichthyes/478500) Fig. 1 Cladogram showing the relationships of the extant teleosts with the other extant actinopterygians. (J. S. Nelson, Fishes of the World, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, 2006) 1 of 9 10/7/2015 1:07 PM Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 Morphology Much of the evidence for teleost monophyly (evolving from a common ancestral form) and relationships comes from the caudal skeleton and concomitant acquisition of a homocercal tail (upper and lower lobes of the caudal fin are symmetrical). This type of tail primitively results from an ontogenetic fusion of centra (bodies of vertebrae) and the possession of paired bracing bones located bilaterally along the dorsal region of the caudal skeleton, derived ontogenetically from the neural arches (uroneurals) of the ural (tail) centra. -
Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes
Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes VICTOR G. SPRINGER m SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 367 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoo/ogy Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review. -
13. Kneriidae = 13. Kneriidae
13. KNERIIDAE Robert C. SCHELLY Four anatomically disparate genera (Kneria, Parakneria, Grasseichthys and Cromeria) and 24 species are currently recognised within the Kneriidae. Kneriids are anotophysian members of the Ostariophysi and lack a Weberian apparatus. They are found in tropical Africa (including the Nile basin), mostly in flowing waters. Two of the four genera are represented in Lower Guinea: Grasseichthys and Parakneria. Parakneria are readily distinguished from Grasseichthys by their cylindrical body with a flat ventral surface, inferior mouth with keratinized ridges in place of teeth, numerous small scales and large, paddle- shaped pectoral fins positioned abdominally. KEY Very small (20 mm or less in SL) and larval in appearance, laterally TO GENERA compressed, scaleless, with terminal mouth ..... Grasseichthys Adults reach 60 mm SL or more, torpedo-shaped with flat ventral surface, body covered with small cycloid scales, mouth inferior .............................................................................. Parakneria Genus Grasseichthys Géry, 1964 Grasseichthys are miniaturized, scaleless fish with a small, terminal and toothless mouth and small gill openings. Because of its ‘larval appearance’, small size and lack of skeletal ossification, Grasseichthys has been called a paedomorphic kneriid. Grasseichthys gabonensis and ventral edge (ventral extension Géry, 1964 is more developed). Caudal fin forked, with 16 rays, including an unbranched Description: small, elongate, relatively ray on the dorsal and ventral edge. shallow-bodied (BD 17.9-20.0% SL Fin spines lacking. Dorsal III, 4-5; in females and 15.2-17.9% SL in males) anal III, 6-7. Vertebrae, 35-36. and laterally compressed. Head small Two branchiostegal rays. Body scaleless (HL 18.0-22.7% SL), with small, and semi-translucent, with myomeres terminal mouth and large eyes. -
Fish, Various Invertebrates
Zambezi Basin Wetlands Volume II : Chapters 7 - 11 - Contents i Back to links page CONTENTS VOLUME II Technical Reviews Page CHAPTER 7 : FRESHWATER FISHES .............................. 393 7.1 Introduction .................................................................... 393 7.2 The origin and zoogeography of Zambezian fishes ....... 393 7.3 Ichthyological regions of the Zambezi .......................... 404 7.4 Threats to biodiversity ................................................... 416 7.5 Wetlands of special interest .......................................... 432 7.6 Conservation and future directions ............................... 440 7.7 References ..................................................................... 443 TABLE 7.2: The fishes of the Zambezi River system .............. 449 APPENDIX 7.1 : Zambezi Delta Survey .................................. 461 CHAPTER 8 : FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS ................... 487 8.1 Introduction ................................................................. 487 8.2 Literature review ......................................................... 488 8.3 The Zambezi River basin ............................................ 489 8.4 The Molluscan fauna .................................................. 491 8.5 Biogeography ............................................................... 508 8.6 Biomphalaria, Bulinis and Schistosomiasis ................ 515 8.7 Conservation ................................................................ 516 8.8 Further investigations ................................................. -
Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J. -
Jlb Smith Institute of Ichthyology
ISSN 0075-2088 J.L.B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY GRAHAMSTOWN, SOUTH AFRICA SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 56 SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAMES OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FRESHWATER FISHES by Paul H. Skelton November 1993 SERIAL PUBLICATIONS o f THE J.L.B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY The Institute publishes original research on the systematics, zoogeography, ecology, biology and conservation of fishes. Manuscripts on ancillary subjects (aquaculture, fishery biology, historical ichthyology and archaeology pertaining to fishes) will be considered subject to the availability of publication funds. Two series are produced at irregular intervals: the Special Publication series and the Ichthyological Bulletin series. Acceptance of manuscripts for publication is subject to the approval of reviewers from outside the Institute. Priority is given to papers by staff of the Institute, but manuscripts from outside the Institute will be considered if they are pertinent to the work of the Institute. Colour illustrations can be printed at the expense of the author. Publications of the Institute are available by subscription or in exchange for publi cations of other institutions. Lists of the Institute’s publications are available from the Publications Secretary at the address below. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Manuscripts shorter than 30 pages will generally be published in the Special Publications series; longer papers will be considered for the Ichthyological Bulletin series. Please follow the layout and format of a recent Bulletin or Special Publication. Manuscripts must be submitted in duplicate to the Editor, J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Private Bag 1015, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa. The typescript must be double-spaced throughout with 25 mm margins all round. -
A Guide to the Parasites of African Freshwater Fishes
A Guide to the Parasites of African Freshwater Fishes Edited by T. Scholz, M.P.M. Vanhove, N. Smit, Z. Jayasundera & M. Gelnar Volume 18 (2018) Chapter 2.1. FISH DIVERSITY AND ECOLOGY Martin REICHARD Diversity of fshes in Africa Fishes are the most taxonomically diverse group of vertebrates and Africa shares a large portion of this diversity. This is due to its rich geological history – being a part of Gondwana, it shares taxa with the Neotropical region, whereas recent close geographical affnity to Eurasia permitted faunal exchange with European and Asian taxa. At the same time, relative isolation and the complex climatic and geological history of Africa enabled major diversifcation within the continent. The taxonomic diversity of African freshwater fshes is associated with functional and ecological diversity. While freshwater habitats form a tiny fraction of the total surface of aquatic habitats compared with the marine environment, most teleost fsh diversity occurs in fresh waters. There are over 3,200 freshwater fsh species in Africa and it is likely several hundreds of species remain undescribed (Snoeks et al. 2011). This high diversity and endemism is likely mirrored in diversity and endemism of their parasites. African fsh diversity includes an ancient group of air-breathing lungfshes (Protopterus spp.). Other taxa are capable of breathing air and tolerate poor water quality, including several clariid catfshes (e.g., Clarias spp.; Fig. 2.1.1D) and anabantids (Ctenopoma spp.). Africa is also home to several bichir species (Polypterus spp.; Fig. 2.1.1A), an ancient fsh group endemic to Africa, and bonytongue Heterotis niloticus (Cuvier, 1829) (Osteoglossidae), a basal actinopterygian fsh. -
The Branchial Skeleton in Aptian Chanid Fishes
Cretaceous Research 112 (2020) 104454 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes The branchial skeleton in Aptian chanid fishes (Gonorynchiformes) from the Araripe Basin (Brazil): Autecology and paleoecological implications * Alexandre Cunha Ribeiro a, , Francisco Jose Poyato-Ariza b, Filipe Giovanini Varejao~ c, Flavio Alicino Bockmann d a Departamento de Biologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Av. Fernando Corr^ea da Costa, 2367, Cuiaba 78060-900, Mato Grosso, Brazil b Centre for Integration on Palaeobiology & Unidad de Paleontología, Departamento de Biología, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, E-28049, Madrid, Spain c Instituto LAMIR, Departamento de Geologia, Universidade Federal do Parana, Av. Cel. Francisco H. dos Santos, 100, Jardim das Americas, Curitiba 81531- 980, Parana, Brazil d Laboratorio de Ictiologia de Ribeirao~ Preto, Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de Sao~ Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeirao~ Preto 14040- 901, Sao~ Paulo, Brazil article info abstract Article history: Gonorynchiformes are a small, but morphologically diverse group of teleost fishes with an extensive Received 17 October 2019 fossil record. Most extant gonorynchiforms are efficient filter feeders, bearing long gill rakers and other Received in revised form morphological specializations, such as microbranchiospines and an epibranchial organ. The analyses of 28 January 2020 the gill arch of the Brazilian gonorynchiform fishes Dastilbe crandalli and Tharrias araripis from the Aptian Accepted in revised form 12 March 2020 of the Araripe Basin, Northeast Brazil, demonstrate significant morphological variation suggestive of Available online 19 March 2020 distinct feeding habitats as well as ontogenetic dietary shifts in these closely related gonorynchiforms. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. -
Systematic Morphology of Fishes in the Early 21St Century
Copeia 103, No. 4, 2015, 858–873 When Tradition Meets Technology: Systematic Morphology of Fishes in the Early 21st Century Eric J. Hilton1, Nalani K. Schnell2, and Peter Konstantinidis1 Many of the primary groups of fishes currently recognized have been established through an iterative process of anatomical study and comparison of fishes that has spanned a time period approaching 500 years. In this paper we give a brief history of the systematic morphology of fishes, focusing on some of the individuals and their works from which we derive our own inspiration. We further discuss what is possible at this point in history in the anatomical study of fishes and speculate on the future of morphology used in the systematics of fishes. Beyond the collection of facts about the anatomy of fishes, morphology remains extremely relevant in the age of molecular data for at least three broad reasons: 1) new techniques for the preparation of specimens allow new data sources to be broadly compared; 2) past morphological analyses, as well as new ideas about interrelationships of fishes (based on both morphological and molecular data) provide rich sources of hypotheses to test with new morphological investigations; and 3) the use of morphological data is not limited to understanding phylogeny and evolution of fishes, but rather is of broad utility to understanding the general biology (including phenotypic adaptation, evolution, ecology, and conservation biology) of fishes. Although in some ways morphology struggles to compete with the lure of molecular data for systematic research, we see the anatomical study of fishes entering into a new and exciting phase of its history because of recent technological and methodological innovations. -
On the Ecology of Cromeria Occidentalis (Teleostei: Gonorynchiformes)
173 Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 173-180, 5 fi gs., June 2006 © 2006 by Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, Germany – ISSN 0936-9902 On the ecology of Cromeria occidentalis (Teleostei: Gonorynchiformes) Timo Moritz*, Ralf Britz** and K. Eduard Linsenmair* Cromeria occidentalis, a miniaturized gonorynchiform of up to 35 mm SL, occurs in the big river systems of West Africa: Niger, Benoué and Volta. It is a bottom dwelling fi sh that we collected on various substrates. We performed choice experiments in aquaria to test the substrate preference of this species. Although sand was preferred over coarse gravel, no substrate was chosen exclusively; surprisingly the naked glass bottom of the tank was preferred over all other substrates. Burrowing into the substrate is a very rare behaviour, at least under aquarium condi- tions. Cromeria occidentalis feeds on small particles, which are ingested by quick movements of the protractile jaws, or occasionally scraped from the substrate using keratinous unculi on the lips. Food particles are then concen- trated in the epibranchial organ situated between the fourth and fi fth gill arches. The intestinal tract of wild-caught specimens is about 1.5 times the body length and contained fi ne organic food particles that could not be identifi ed more specifi cally. Introduction Material and methods In the gonorynchiform genus Cromeria (Kneriidae) Fish sample data from 12 months of fi eld work two species are currently recognized: C. nilotica in West Africa between October 2003 and May from the Upper Nile basin and C. occidentalis from 2005 were used to characterize the natural envi- larger river basins of West Africa west of the Chad ronment, where C. -
Order GONORYNCHIFORMES
click for previous page 1822 Bony Fishes Order GONORYNCHIFORMES CHANIDAE Milkfish by T. Bagarinao A single species in this family. Chanos chanos (Forsskål, 1775) MIL Frequent synonyms / misidentifications: None / None. FAO names: En - Milkfish; Fr - Chanos; Sp - Sabalo. Diagnostic characters: Body elongate, moderately compressed, smooth, and streamlined. Eye covered by adipose tissue. Mouth small, terminal, without teeth. Lower jaw with small tubercle at tip, fitting into a notch in upper jaw. No bony gular plate between arms of lower jaw. Branchiostegal rays only 4. Gill rakers fine and numerous. Pharyngeal sacs present. Fins without spines; dorsal fin with 13 to 17 rays, about midpoint of body; anal fin short, with 9 to 11 rays, close to caudal fin; caudal fin large and deeply forked, with scale flaps at base in adults; pectoral and pelvic fins with axillary scales. No scutes along belly. Scales small and smooth, 75 to 91 on lateral line. Intramuscular bones long and numerous. Esophagus with spiral folds, stomach well developed; intestine very long and convoluted. Colour: silvery on belly and sides, grading to olive-green or blue on back; dorsal, anal, and caudal fins with dark margin; peritoneum black. Size: Maximum total length about 150 cm, wild adults commonly 70 to 100 cm; pond-grown juveniles in markets, 20 to 40 cm; larvae or “fry” commercially collected from shore waters and river mouths, 10 to 17 mm. filamentous Similar families occurring in the area Megalopidae (Megalops cyprinoides): a bony gular plate present between arms of lower jaw; last dorsal-fin ray filamentous; scales large, 30 to 40 in lateral line.