The Byzantine Economy Angeliki E. Laiou and Cecile Morrisson Index More Information

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Byzantine Economy Angeliki E. Laiou and Cecile Morrisson Index More Information Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-61502-0 - The Byzantine Economy Angeliki E. Laiou and Cecile Morrisson Index More information INDEX . abiotikion, 159 Andronikos I, emperor of Trebizond Abydos, 35, 52 (1222–35), 216 accounting, 104, 239 Andronikos II, emperor (1282–1328), 217, Achaia, 167 224 added value, 231 Andros, 111, 128, 190 adelphata, 17 Angevins, 171, 221 Adoulis, 36 animal husbandry, 171 Adrianople, 199 animals, 67, 113 Adriatic sea, 8 animals, pack-animals, 37 Aegean sea, 8, 11, 167, 169, 173, 185, 206, annona civica, 33 212, 213, 215, 220 Antaeopolis, 32 Africa, 11, 15, 35 Antioch, 26 agronomy, 104 Apameia, 26 Akominatos, Michael, 98 Aphrodito, 26, 32 Alexandria, 26, 37, 139 apiculture, 97, 110, 113 Alexios I Komnenos, emperor Apions, family, 32 (1081–1118), 141, 144, 151, 159 Apokaukos, Alexios, 172 Alexios III Angelos, emperor (1195–1203), Apulia, 11, 118 142 aqc¸e, 217 al-Hakim II, caliph (961–976), 77 Arabs, 6 al-Idrisi, 131 arca frumentaria, 34 alimentary products, 56 archaeology, 2, 5 al-Mamun, caliph (813–833), 53 archontes, 129 Almoravids, 155 Argolid, 46, 95 Alonnesos/Pelagonnesi, shipwreck, 117 argyroprates-ai (bankers), 72 alum, 33, 172, 189, 194 aristocracy, 59, 63, 80, 132, 141, 181, 182, Amalfi, 84, 143 199, 244 Amorion, 48, 56, 75, 118, 119, 123, 130, Aristotle, 2, 61, 162 131, 137 armamenton-a (arsenals), 74 Anastasios I, emperor (491–518), Armenia, 30 27 Armenia, Lesser, 202 Anatolia, 11, 46, 191 Armenians, 45, 96, 190 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-61502-0 - The Byzantine Economy Angeliki E. Laiou and Cecile Morrisson Index More information Index 261 arms, 55 Black Sea, 135, 172, 185, 187, 202, 203, arsenals, 74 204, 205, 207, 208, 210, 211, 212, 213, art objects, 183 214 art, industries of, 56, 74 blacksmiths, 70, 78 Arta, 183, 206 Boeotia, 12, 110, 111, 129 artisanal activities/production, 111, 115, Boilas, Eustathios, 104 182 Book of the Prefect, 44, 57, 61, 71, 72, 129 artisans, 118, 122, 123, 124, 132, 164, 199 Bouras, Ch., 5 Artze, 137 Bozburun, 82 Asia Minor, 96, 111, 114, 137, 167, 170, bread, 17, 56 172, 182, 187 Bruges, 214 aspers, 217, 223 Bryennios, Nikephoros, 150 aspron-a trachy-ea, billon or copper coin, 151 building, 40, 131, 132, 198 assay, of coins, 217 Bulgaria, 52, 92, 95, 97, 167, 168, 246 associations, commercial, 18, 140 Bulgars, 43 Athanasios I, Patriarch of Constantinoploe, Bursa, 13 228 Athanasios, hegoumenos of Lavra, 104 cadastre, 21, 51 Athens, 118, 127, 132, 181 Caesarea, 26 Athos, Mt., 173, 181, 209 Caffa, 207 Attaleia, 137 Cairo, 139 Attaleiates, Michael, 2, 162 Calabria, 11, 12, 40, 45, 92, 110 Attica, 118 cameos, 183 augustal, gold coin, 222 Candia, 206 autarkeia, 112 capital, 61, 108, 109, 129, 140, 141, 161, Avars, 24, 39 163 Avlona, 206 Cappadocia, 32, 45, 96 Avramiton, 176 Caricinˇ Grad, 29 Axios (Vardar), 11 carpets, 125 cash crops, 98, 110, 175, 176, 180 Badoer, Giacomo, 193, 194, 198, 221 Catalans, 181 Baghdad, 134, 139 cattle, 81, 97 bakers, bakeries, 34 cattle raising, 67, 171 Balkans, 11, 26, 29, 40, 95 caviar, 15 Balsamon, 162 ceramics, 33, 34, 70 bankers, 27, 38, 72, 141, 197, 199, 213 Aegean Ware, 184, 185, 187 banking, 38, 199, 202, 233, 243, 246 African Red Slip, 35, 41 Barcelona, 138, 208 Elaborate Incised Ware, 187 barley, 98 exports, 118, 121 Basil I, emperor (867–886), 20 Fine Sgraffito Ware, 117 Basil II, emperor (976–1025), 8, 9, 16, 53, glazed, 116, 117, 118, 121 95, 102, 115, 155 Glazed White Ware, 41, 75, 116, 185 Basilics, 62, 71 Measles Ware, 117 basilikon silver coin, 217 Palestinian amphorae, 35 beekeeping. See apiculture Phocaean, 35 Benjamin of Tudela, 128, 130, 138 Polychrome Ware, 76 besant, 147, 155, 220 Sgraffito Ware, 121 billon, 217 Sicilian Ware, 75 Bir Umm Fawakhir, 30 Slip Painted, 117 Bithynia, 11, 12, 13, 45, 46, 55, 81, 190, 203 St. Symeon Ware, 186 Black Death, 196. See also plague, 39, 192 Zeuxippus Ware, 184, 185, 187 Zeuxippus Ware derivatives, 184, 185 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-61502-0 - The Byzantine Economy Angeliki E. Laiou and Cecile Morrisson Index More information 262 Index cereals, 65, 97. See grain consumption, 54, 132, 133 Chalkidike, 172, 176, 182, 193 contracts, 18, 20, 32, 62, 80, 163, 228, 233 Chandax, 118, 119 copper, mines, 30 cheese, 138 coppersmiths, 70, 78 Cherson, 41, 84 Cordoba,´ 21, 77 Chilandar, monastery, 179 Corinth, 75, 117, 118, 119, 123, 124, 127, Chilia, 207 128, 131, 136, 171, 185, 186, 187, 189, China, 31, 36, 202 190 Chios, 137, 205, 207 Coron, 167, 191, 206 Chora, monastery of, 122 corporations, 71 chorion, 68 corvees,´ 51, 156, 179 chreokoinonia, 140 Cosmas Indicopleustes, 36 chrysochos-oi, 27 cotton, 171, 172, 195, 203 Cilicia, 11, 45, 96 court titles, 53, 141 Cipolla, C., 155 craftsmen, 27, 70, 122, 198 cities, 5, 25, 26, 27, 31, 34, 37, 39, 41, 42, barrel-makers, 198 47, 55, 73, 87, 93, 118, 131, 133, 137, smiths, 198 182, 196, 197, 232, 237, 240, 241, 246 soap-makers, 198 autonomy, 196, 197, 200 craftsmen, rural, 32 centers of production, 241 credit, 72, 140 freedom of, 182 Crete, 11, 53, 114, 137, 138, 167, 172, 189, functions of, 131 202, 205, 206, 211 civil war of (1341–1354), 199 Crimea, 185, 188, 204 Clarentza, 191, 206 crisis climate, 8, 11, 12, 15, 25, 39, 47, 65, 236, mid-fourteenth century, 233, 237 238 seventh-century, 231, 237, 241 Clysma, 36 crusader states, 145, 202, 203, 204 coinage, 37, 54, 63, 85 crusades, 143, 153 alloy, 216 Fourth Crusade, 127, 147, 166, 167, 203 copper, 38, 87 Crypta Balbi, 41 gold, 50, 53, 148 crystal, 183 gold, Byzantine, 215 currency, 202 gold, Venetian, 221 Cyprus, 11, 17, 25, 30, 35, 37, 40, 131, 136, gold, Western, 215 168, 172, 185, 186, 202 integrating role, 226 Latin Empire, 216 Dagron, G., 78 silver, 150 Dalmatia, 29 coins Danelis, 67 foreign, 215 Danube, 11 production, 74 Davidson, G. R., 123 imitations, 223 debasement, 88, 147, 148, 149, 217, 223 colleganza, 73, 243 decline, 3, 24, 26, 38, 40, 42 commenda, 73, 140, 194, 243 defters (Turkish registers), 16 Commercial Revolution, 241 demand, 7, 43, 56, 71, 97, 115, 121, 124, Constantine V, emperor (741–775), 45, 51, 126, 132, 135, 142, 160, 163, 170, 182, 231 243 Constantine IX Monomachos, emperor domestic demand, 193 (1042–55), 135, 149 elite demand, 73, 76, 113, 122, 124, 126, Constantinople, 33, 41, 47, 48, 54, 71, 73, 132, 160, 167, 182, 186, 192, 244 83, 116, 117, 122, 131, 138, 139, 166, foreign, 126 169, 196, 197, 203, 207, 208, 223 international, 183, 201, 203 construction, 27, 124, 132, 149, 198 demography, 4, 44, 91, 169, 195 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-61502-0 - The Byzantine Economy Angeliki E. Laiou and Cecile Morrisson Index More information Index 263 deniers tournois, French or Frankish silver Epiros, 11, 15, 167, 169, 171, 186, 187, 191, coins, 223 206, 216, 224 deportations, 45 episkepseis, 102 development, 233, 234, 236, 237, 243, 244, epitropos (steward), 104 247 ergasteriakoi (craftsmen and traders), 71 Didymoteichon, 199 estates diminishing returns, 90 imperial, 32, 59, 102, 239, 244 dinar, 155 large, 4, 69, 97, 101, 103, 169, 173, 174, dirhem, 85 238 division of labour, 80, 164, 195, 202, 203, management, 104, 175, 239 204 senatorial, 32 Djadovo, 111 esterlin, English silver coin, 223 Dobrudja, 119, 125 Euboea, 128, 190 Dokimeion, 29 Euchaita, 131, 137 domain, mode of exploitation, 239 Europe, Northern, 237, 240, 245 domus divinae (imperial domains), 32 Europe, Western, 125, 171, 173, 182, 233, Dor D wreck, 40 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, doukaton, 217 243, 244, 245, 246 dowries, 18, 126 exchange, 240, 241, 243, 244 ducat economic exchange, 33, 241 Venetian gold coin, 222 gift exchange, 134, 244 Venetian silver coin, 223 non-economic, 6, 53, 134, 244 dye shops, 127 exchange economy, 2, 4, 91, 113, 115, 133, dyes, 33, 66, 132, 173 139, 163, 201 porphyra, 79 exemptions, 156, 158 dyestuffs, 171, 191 exkousseia-ai (immunity), 106, 156 acorns, 171 exploitation, 100, 105, 107, 111, 114, 178, kermes, 171 179, 239 murex, 33 land, 12, 103 dynatoi, 102 export Dyrrachion (Durazzo, Durres),¨ 27, 37, 136, control, 204 144, 206 exports, 89 Byzantine, 35, 138 earthquakes, 12 Ecloga, 61 fabricae (arms factories), 33 economic behavior, 2 fairs, 81, 113, 128, 137, 180 economic concepts, 6 family, 18, 171, 178, 213 economic growth, 3 famine, 58, 228 Economic History of Byzantium, 5 Farmer’s Law, 44, 65, 69, 99 economic policy, 2, 224 Fatimids, 84, 137, 155 economy feudalism, 105, 157 Western, 235, 236, 237, 244 finances, imperial, 220 economy, mixed, 231, 234, 235 fire beacons, 21 economy, political, 229 fisc, 145 Egypt, 15, 17, 24, 30, 32, 34, 36, 114, 126, fiscal policy, 2, 156 128, 137, 138, 139, 142, 201, 202, 205 fiscality. See taxation embole, 34 fish, 84 emporos-oi (merchants), 80 fishing, 15, 110, 172 enamels, 132, 183 flax, 172 endowments, 170, 246 florin, gold coin, 223 Eparch (Prefect of Constantinople), 72 follis-es, copper coin, 37, 85, 88, 153 Ephesus, 26 food, 17 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-61502-0 - The Byzantine Economy Angeliki E. Laiou and Cecile Morrisson Index More information 264 Index forest, 172 Harmenopoulos, Constantine, 228, 229 Fos, shipwreck, 41 Harvey, A., 3, 112, 243, 245 Foss, C., 3 Hebros (Marica), 11 Francia, 236, 237 Hendy, M. F., 3, 151 Frederick II Hohenstaufen, emperor Herakleios, emperor (610–641), 24, 50 (1214–1250), 222 heuresis thesaurou, 159 free market, 234 Hexabiblos, 228 freedom of the sea, 208 Hieron, 52 fruit,
Recommended publications
  • (PART I) Pantelis CHARALAMPAKIS* This Paper1 Is the Outcome
    2016 2 / 2 (1-17) 12 SHORT NOTES ON THE PROSOPOGRAPHY OF THE BYZANTINE THEME OF KOLONEIA (PART I) * Pantelis CHARALAMPAKIS *Research Fellow, Centre for This paper1 is the outcome of a preliminary study re- Advanced Study, Sofia. lated to the TAKTIKON database developed at the [email protected] 2 Academy of Athens, Greece. The history and proso- pography of the Byzantine theme of Koloneia in the Pontos area have been so far discussed in a very few – yet important – works only, and this is not because of lack of interest, but because of the limited infor- mation provided by literary sources and the small number of seals discovered. The main objective is to publish two so far unknown lead seals issued by officials who served in the theme of Koloneia, as well as to provide the reader with up- dated prosopographical lists of the thematic offi- cials. Needless to say, the prosopographical lists pre- sented in this paper are incomplete, because there are more unpublished collections of seals – some of them hard to access – that have to be examined. In a future second part of this study we shall present the remaining offices, together with discussion on some -------------------------------------------------------- 1 I would like to thank Dr. Osman Emir for encouraging me to write for KAREN Studies and also for his warm hospitality in Trabzon in May 2016. Moreover, I am indebted to Dr. Harald Schulze (Archäologische Staatssammlung München) and Dr. Vassa Kontouma (IFEB), for granting me permission to publish the seals, and, of course, to Prof. Jean-Claude Cheynet, who shared information and provided me with photos of the IFEB and BnF specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of D1ta11kta George Huxley
    A List of "aplekta" [Greek] Huxley, George Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1975; 16, 1; ProQuest pg. 87 A List of d1tA11Kta George Huxley HE ONLY complete manuscript of the De Ceremoniis of Con­ Tstantine Porphyrogenitus, the Lipsiensis of saec. XII,1 in­ dudes, ff.l-21 recto, three texts which do not belong to the ceremonial treatise, although Reiske oddly entitled them Appendix ad librum primum. 2 All three texts are closely related in subject matter. The first is {m60enc TWV {Jaet>..tKWV Tafet8lwv Kat {nrop.VTJCLC Twv a1T>..orJKTWV (pp.444-45 ed. Bonn). The second is bca 8et 1Tapacf>v>..&TTELV {JaoA.lwc p.l>..A.ovToc TafEtSevew (pp.445-54). The third, &a Set ylvecOat, TOV p.ey&>..ov Kat vt/J'fJ>I.Ov flact>..lwc TWV •pw/Latwv iJ-tAAoVTOC q,occaTEVCat (pp.455-508), is a treatise dedicated to Romanos, the emperor's son. The three texts together form material assembled for a treatise, which Bury entitled '17'Ept Twv {JactAtKwv TafetSlwv; he suggested that the first and second sections had been prepared for incorporation in the third. They were, however, not incorporated, but, Bury further suggested, the redactor who is responsible for the form in which the De Ceremoniis has come down had found all three pieces in physical juxtaposition.3 Here I am concerned only with the text of the first of the three pieces, the list of a'1TATJKTa (a'1TAtKTa< applicatus), 'etapes' or 'stations', at which the emperor halts on his way through Asia Minor. Since the • list provides valuable evidence for East Roman military organisation in Asia Minor, it is important that historical conclusions should not be drawn from a defective text.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantium and Bulgaria, 775-831
    Byzantium and Bulgaria, 775–831 East Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 450–1450 General Editor Florin Curta VOLUME 16 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.nl/ecee Byzantium and Bulgaria, 775–831 By Panos Sophoulis LEIDEN • BOSTON 2012 Cover illustration: Scylitzes Matritensis fol. 11r. With kind permission of the Bulgarian Historical Heritage Foundation, Plovdiv, Bulgaria. Brill has made all reasonable efforts to trace all rights holders to any copyrighted material used in this work. In cases where these efforts have not been successful the publisher welcomes communications from copyright holders, so that the appropriate acknowledgements can be made in future editions, and to settle other permission matters. This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sophoulis, Pananos, 1974– Byzantium and Bulgaria, 775–831 / by Panos Sophoulis. p. cm. — (East Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 450–1450, ISSN 1872-8103 ; v. 16.) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-20695-3 (hardback : alk. paper) 1. Byzantine Empire—Relations—Bulgaria. 2. Bulgaria—Relations—Byzantine Empire. 3. Byzantine Empire—Foreign relations—527–1081. 4. Bulgaria—History—To 1393. I. Title. DF547.B9S67 2011 327.495049909’021—dc23 2011029157 ISSN 1872-8103 ISBN 978 90 04 20695 3 Copyright 2012 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Global Oriental, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emperor Michael III and the Battle of Bishop's Meadow (A.D. 863) Huxley, George Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1975; 16, 4; Proquest Pg
    The Emperor Michael III and the Battle of Bishop's Meadow (A.D. 863) Huxley, George Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1975; 16, 4; ProQuest pg. 443 The Emperor Michael III and the Battle of Bishop's Meadow (A.D. 863) George Huxley HE FOUR BOOKS of Genesios deal with Byzantine history from T the accession of Leo the Armenian to the death of Basil I. In the fourth book Genesios includes an account of the defeat by Petronas, uncle of the emperor Michael III, of the redoubtable cOmar cUbaid Allah al AqtaC of Melitene.1 According to the historian, cOmar (" Af'EP, C Amr) invaded the Armeniak theme and advanced as far as the coast at Amisos where, because he could progress no further, he ordered the sea to be beaten with rods (Genesios here com­ pares the behaviour of Xerxes at the Hellespont). The emperor, being dismayed at the number of prisoners taken by cOmar, appointed Petronas to command the tagma of the Schools with orders to attack the enemy. When news of the coming attack reached cOmar, his subordinates urged him to retreat to his own territory and to fight only if the Byzantine forces overtook them; but the emir, declaring that he was no coward, decided to advance towards Petro­ nas and his army. The opposed forces drew close together in the Abisian district on the borders of the Paphlagonian and Armeniak themes, with a mountain between them, at a place called Porson (ll6pcwv). Both sides tried to occupy the mountain, and in the ensuing battle COmar was killed.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Patterns and Defence on Northern Chios, 9Th - 16Th Centuries
    “CAPITANIA VALISSO CASTRUM DICTI LOCI”: SETTLEMENT PATTERNS AND DEFENCE ON NORTHERN CHIOS, 9TH - 16TH CENTURIES by IOANNA NIKOLAOU KOUKOUNI A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity College of Arts & Law University of Birmingham December 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. TO THE REVERED MEMORY OF MY FATHER AND OF MY GRANDPARENTS, AND ALL OUR NORTH-CHIOT ANCESTORS FOR THEY PLOUGHED THIS LAND WITH THE TEARS OF THEIR TOIL. I PAY THIS TRIBUTE ABSTRACT This thesis is a survey of Mount Amani, the northwestern province of Chios island (east Aegean). The thesis examines the natural environment and explores the landscape using different kinds of information, in order to reconstruct the medieval historical topography of this region and to contribute to the problématique of the history and evolution of the Byzantine village and its remarkable longevity. The methodology applied ranges from the scanty literary sources, and visible archaeological evidence, and extends to the tracing of any sign of human activity on the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Names for SCA Personae
    1 A Short (and rough) Guide to Byzantine Names for SCA personae This is a listing of names that may be useful for constructing Byzantine persona. Having said that, please note that the term „Byzantine‟ is one that was not used in the time of the Empire. They referred to themselves as Romans. Please also note that this is compiled by a non-historian and non-linguist. When errors are detected, please let me know so that I can correct them. Additional material is always welcomed. It is a work in progress and will be added to as I have time to research more books. This is the second major revision and the number of errors picked up is legion. If you have an earlier copy throw it away now. Some names of barbarians who became citizens are included. Names from „client states‟ such as Serbia and Bosnia, as well as adversaries, can be found in my other article called Names for other Eastern Cultures. In itself it is not sufficient documentation for heraldic submission, but it will give you ideas and tell you where to start looking. The use of (?) means that either I have nothing that gives me an idea, or that I am not sure of what I have. If there are alternatives given of „c‟, „x‟ and „k‟ modern scholarship prefers the „k‟. „K‟ is closer to the original in both spelling and pronunciation. Baron, OP, Strategos tous notious okeanous, known to the Latins as Hrolf Current update 12/08/2011 Family Names ............................................................. 2 Male First Names .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Neighbours (600–1045)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository CHAPTER 8 ARMENIAN NEIGHBOURS (600–1045) t. w. greenwood introduction Anyone wishing to unravel the history of the relationship between Byzan- tium and Armenia from late antiquity into the eleventh century has to confront a series of historical and historiographical challenges. The most immediate, and intractable, of these is one of definition: what does ‘Armenia’ mean? Although Armenia is used to express a territorial entity in contemporary texts, both Armenian and non-Armenian in origin, its precise meaning varies according to the date and the context in which it is used. Far from finding a single, stable definition of Armenia, one discovers multiple ‘Armenias’.1 Thus a seventh-century Armenian geographical com- pilation depicts ‘Great Armenia’ as comprising not only regions currently recognised as Armenian but also those with historic associations.2 Successive provinces of Armenia were imposed and superimposed by external powers, each with a particular scope. The kingdom of Armenia, re-established in 884, bore little relation to its Arsacid precursor and increasingly represented only the Bagratuni kingdom centred on Ani, excluding rival kingdoms in Vaspurakan, Siwnik‘ and elsewhere. Given the absence of stable territorial boundaries and in the light of significant Arab settlement in certain districts from the end of the eighth century, there have been attempts to construct Armenian identity in terms of a blend of confessional,
    [Show full text]
  • Map 87 Pontus-Phasis Compiled by David Braund and T
    Map 87 Pontus-Phasis Compiled by David Braund and T. Sinclair (Turkey), 1997 with the assistance of Diane Braund Introduction Pontus The land of Pontus has two main parts, both of which belonged to the Mithridatic kingdom of Pontus in the Hellenistic period. The first is the main ridge of the Pontic mountains and the steep descent to the shore. The lower slopes are thickly wooded, and the shore districts have a humid and rainy climate. In the main Pontic ridge a gap occurs in the hinterland of Amisus (modern Samsun), after which the mountain chain continues at a lower height and with less abrupt slopes (Strabo’s term Paryadres seems to denote the higher part of the chain). As far east as Rhizaion (Rize) Greek settlements along the coast have existed since the sixth century B.C., and in the case of Sinope the seventh. To the south, the Pontic chain is bordered by Armenia Minor, a part of Armenia itself (Late Antique Sper, probably the Syspiritis of the classical authors), and what was to become the Georgian mountainous district of Tao, drained by the R. Glaukos (Oltu Çay) and the Tortum Çay. The district of Chaldia, the Gümüşhane basin, is difficult to classify, particularly in classical times, as there is no evidence that it belonged either to Pontus (in a geographical or administrative sense), to Armenia Minor, or to Armenia itself. The Roman empire made no effort to control the interior of Chaldia until the reign of Justinian. The second part of Pontus is the series of fertile inland plains, joined by relatively low chains of hills, in the river systems of the Iris (Kızıl Irmak) and the lower Halys (Yeşil Irmak).
    [Show full text]
  • I. Roads from Caesareia to Tee East
    22 THE ROAD-SYSTEM OF EASTERN ASIA MINOR THE ROAD-SYSTEM OF EASTERN ASIA MINOR WITH THE EVIDENCE OF BYZANTINE CAMPAIGNS. [PLATE I.] PART I. OF late years a good deal of discussion has been devoted to the Road- System of Cappadocia and the Tauros region in ancient times, and it might seem at first sight superfluous to discuss the subject over again. But con- clusions already reached must always be tested in the light of new facts; and in the case before us several new facts have come to hand, which illuminate our subject and enable us to introduce into it a considerable amount of simplification. I propose, therefore, in the following paper to describe the roads which traversed this part of the country and then to prove their direction as well as their importance from the evidence of Byzantine cam- paigns. This is the simplest order to follow, because one campaign generally covers several routes and it would involve a sacrifice of clearness to break up the campaigns into a series of disjecta membra. At every period in the history of Asia Minor the most important roads from the west converged towards Caesareia-Mazaka (Kaisariye), which in later times became the metropolis of Cappadocia, and radiated thence towards east and south. Sebasteia-Sivas forms another centre only second in import- ance to Caesareia; and the entire road-system of Eastern Asia Minor is most easily described and most clearly understood by taking these two cities as the starting-points. I shall therefore begin with the roads leading East and South from Caesareia and afterwards go on to those radiating from Sebasteia-Sivas.
    [Show full text]
  • THE REVOLT of ISAAKIOS KOMNENOS: Reconsideration
    THE REVOLT OF ISAAKIOS KOMNENOS: Reconsideration Yukio NEZU* The purpose of this study is to examine the validity of Prof. Inoue's view which stresses the role of the byzantine aristocrat's olkos (household organization which includes the estates and the retainers) as a driving force of the rebellion of lsaakios Komnenos. I have a number of doubts about Prof. Inoue's view. First, is it possible to argue that the regular army was opposed to the aristocrat's private soldiers? Secondly, had the aristocrats' groups of private soldiers the same close connection to the management of aristocrat oikos? If anything, they seem to have been connected to aristocrats' position as high-ranking military officials. It seems more likely that they formed a small guard corps around the aristocrats' role as high-ranking military officers rather than being formed through their connections with the aristocrats' estate management. If this is the case, then thirdly, it is doubtful whether they had the military strength to determine the success of the rebellion as a separate entity from the state armies. Finally, as a fourth problem, we need to examine if, as Prof. Inoue says, the sheer number of private soldiers was main cause determining the importance of revel leaders, and whether such a condition became the basis of Skylitzes' selection when he named the rebel families. Our final conclusion is that the number of aristocrats' private soldiers was not the decisive factor in selecting the leaders of the revolting armies. The rebellion of lsaakios Komnenos was the one of generals who could mobilize military forces stationed in Asia Minor.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Notes on the Prosopography of the Byzantine Theme of Koloneia (Part II)”, Karadeniz Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5/8, Ss.115-128
    KARADENİZ ARAŞTIRMALARI ENSTİTÜSÜ DERGİSİ THE JOURNAL OF INSTITUTE OF BLACK SEA STUDIES 2019 5 / 8 (115-128) Charalampakis, Pantelis, “Short Notes on the Prosopography of the Byzantine Theme of Koloneia (Part II)”, Karadeniz Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5/8, ss.115-128. DOI: 10.31765/karen.668082 SHORT NOTES ON THE PROSOPOGRAPHY OF THE BYZANTINE THEME OF KOLONEIA (PART II)* Pantelis CHARALAMPAKIS * Araştırma makalesidir. Abstract: This paper presents the case study of Kallistos (reportedly a member of the Melissenos family), one of ** Research Fellow, Greek State the Forty-two Byzantine officials captured by the Arabs in Scholarships Foundation, Athens, the aftermath of the siege of Amorion in 838. The person E-Posta: [email protected] in question has been recorded in scholarly literature as a military officer active in Koloneia (or, according to other ORCID: 0000-0003-1043-6206 views, in the themes of the Anatolikoi or the Armeniakoi). A closer examination of extant evidence, however, may suggest that he never existed – or at least not as a military commander in Koloneia – and his mention in the sources Keywords: Pontos, Koloneia, Byzan- was the result of a misunderstanding and/or fictional tine Theme, Prosopography, 42 writing related to hagiography, politics, or family pres- Martyrs of Amorion, Kallistos Melis- tige. senos. Anahtar Kelimeler: Pontus, Kolo- KOLONEIA THEMASI BİZANS PROSOPOGRAFİSİ neia, Bizans Theması, Prosopografi, ÜZERİNE KISA NOTLAR (BÖLÜM II) 42 Amorion Şehiti, Kallistos Melisse- Öz: Bu makale 838 yılında Amorion kuşatmasının ardın- nos. dan Araplar tarafından ele geçirilen kırk iki Bizans yetki- lisinden biri olan Kallistos’a (Melissenos ailesinin bir üyesi olduğu bildirilir) ilişkin örnek çalışmadır.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabic Lists of the Byzantine Themes Author(S): E
    Arabic Lists of the Byzantine Themes Author(s): E. W. Brooks Source: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 21 (1901), pp. 67-77 Published by: The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/623866 . Accessed: 17/01/2014 10:37 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Hellenic Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 66.77.17.54 on Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:37:28 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions ARABIC LISTS OF THE BYZANTINE THEMES.' OF the themes of the Byzantine Empire there exists in Greek only one systematic account, the confused and discursive work of Constantine Porphyrogennetos, from which little trustworthy information as to the history of the themes before the accession of the Macedonian dynasty can be gathered.2 The same author has also preserved a table of precedence drawn up by Philotheos the protospatharios in the year 899,3 which includes the generals of the various themes existing at that time; and he has himself given us a record of the salaries paid, to the generals in the time of Leo VI.U This lack of information may, however, be in part supplied from the Arab geographers, who provide us with five catalogues of the themes, the earliest of which, that of Ibn Khurdadhbah,5 is fifty years earlier than the list of Philotheos and about one hundred years earlier than Constantine's work.
    [Show full text]