Map 64 Caesarea-Melitene Compiled by T.B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Map 64 Caesarea-Melitene Compiled by T.B Map 64 Caesarea-Melitene Compiled by T.B. Mitford, 1996 Introduction The map covers a region dominated by mountains, the watershed of four great rivers flowing into different seas, and the transition between the endless plains of the Anatolian plateau and the highlands of eastern Turkey. Enclosed to the south by the broken ridges of the Taurus, the region is cut transversely by a more rounded massif, the rising north-easterly sweep of the Antitaurus. To the north and west, the mountains drain into the Kızılırmak (ancient Halys) as it flows towards the Black Sea; to the south, into the Seyhan (Saros) and Ceyhan (Pyramos), before they cut through the Taurus to reach the Mediterranean. To the east, large tributaries flow into the Euphrates, the natural frontier between the classical world and Armenia. Much of the central area lies above the tree line, and is snowbound from November to April. Settlement has concentrated on the river plains: along the Halys between Sivas (Sebasteia) and Kayseri (Caesarea), and to the south and east around Elbistan (Ablastha) and Malatya (Melitene). These formed the main axes of communications in antiquity as today, skirting the high Antitaurus and linking Sivas, Kayseri and Malatya. The geography has changed little since ancient times, except in the east where the Keban and Karakaya dams have transformed the Cappadocian section of the Euphrates into two elongated lakes. Most of the area covered by the map fell under Persian rule, and later comprised the eastern half of the Roman and Byzantine province of Cappadocia. But it also includes parts of Pontus, Armenia Minor and Armenia proper. In the fifth century B.C. it was probably traversed by the Persian Royal Road (described by Herodotus 5.52), the great trade route linking the Aegean with northern Mesopotamia and Susa. In Roman times there were military roads of the highest importance in Cappadocia, leading eastwards from Ancyra through Sebasteia towards Satala and northern Armenia, and through Caesarea to the Euphrates at Melitene. Moreover the eastern limes ran up the Euphrates valley, to continue over the Pontic mountains to the Black Sea. Strabo is an excellent source for the region, and draws on firsthand knowledge; he visited Comana, and wrote in Amaseia, the Pontic metropolis (Map 87 A4), under Augustus and Tiberius. He is thus able to describe the physical, historical and political geography of Cappadocia in careful, if not always reliable, detail. There is copious further documentary evidence for the ancient topography. In the mid-second century Ptolemy compiled the coordinates of the mountains, rivers and cities of Cappadocia and Armenia Minor. The main routes diverging from Caesarea and Sebasteia, and their intermediate stations, are known from ItAnt and TabPeut. Segments of the latter reappear in GeogRav, evidently drawing on a common source. The lists of bishoprics from Late Antiquity are no less essential. Cappadocia did not share the civilized structure of the western and coastal provinces of Asia Minor. Isolated and undeveloped, it was a vast region sparsely covered by villages and divided into districts (strategiai) evidently tribal in origin, adapted by the Seleucid kings as a basis for centralized administration, and retained under the Roman Empire. Much of it was occupied by royal, later imperial, lands. About 150 place names are preserved. Most can be located in general terms, although barely half can be identified with any certainty. The fact is that war, invasion and destruction have been endemic in this region since the third century A.D. Almost all physical traces of antiquity– building materials, inscriptions, even road surfaces–have been pressed into reuse in the reconstruction of towns and villages, generally on sites already found convenient. A few ancient place names have survived in continuous use until modern times: Zara, for example, or Zimara on the Euphrates. Others have evolved in recognizable form: Sivas, Kayseri, Malatya. No comprehensive survey work has been undertaken across eastern Cappadocia as a whole. Notable, but partial, journeys of exploration were undertaken a century ago: along the southern routes by Sterrett (1888), Ramsay (1890), Munro (1893) and Hogarth (1893); in Pontus by Anderson (1903) and Cumont (1906); and up the Euphrates 986 MAP 64 CAESAREA-MELITENE valley by Hogarth and Yorke (1896). Grégoire (1909) later traveled south-westwards from Nicopolis (Map 87 D4), and down the R. Halys. Then, in the final decades of Christianity there, many of the names and traces of antiquity were still preserved. So locations could readily be proposed for many ancient names, and lines for many roads. The early results were collated by Ramsay (1890), and mapped by Anderson (1903). They were supplemented some forty years later by von der Osten’s (1929; 1930; 1933) automobile journeys in the north and east of Cappadocia. His map of ancient sites shows the distribution of settlements in Hittite and earlier times. The detail and conjecture of these earlier travelers cannot always be corroborated, however. For they followed–or created–rudimentary maps, and it was only the publication in 1947 of the Turkish military series (1:200,000) that permitted accurate location of physical and cultural features, and of the roads and tracks linking them. These Turkish maps retain almost all the village-names known to earlier scholars, and form the indispensable foundation of the present compilation. They show that the lines proposed for several roads are unsustainable: Grégoire's roads leading north and west from Zara, for example, or Ramsay's road north-east from Arabissos. They permit precise tracking of milestones (collated by French 1985; 1988) along the strategic road from Caesarea to the Euphrates. And they show where settlement has been possible, and where it has not. In collating evidence for the ancient place names, RE remains essential. More recent work is carefully summarized in TIB Kappadokien to provide a comprehensive study of the geography of Cappadocia in the Byzantine period. Sinclair (1989; 1989a) describes ancient sites and roads in a broader historical framework; Bryer and Winfield (1985) discuss the tortured geography of southern Armenia Minor, where the lines followed by ancient roads are not all firmly established. I have covered the eastern frontier on foot over many years. But across eastern Cappadocia as a whole, exploration has been patchy; of this, the omission from the map of a place as important as Divriği is an unwelcome reflection. Directory All place names are in Turkey Abbreviation TIB Kappadokien F. Hild and M. Restle, Tabula Imperii Byzantini 2, Kappadokien (Kappadokia, Charsianon, Sebasteia und Lykandos), DenkWien 149, 1981 Names Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location Reference E4 Ablastha R?L Elbistan TIB Kappadokien 260 H4 Ad Aras AHRL Pirot? Dillemann 1962, 117 B1 Agranai RL near Muşalım Kalesi TIB Kappadokien 137 §Agriane B1 Akdağmadeni R?L TIB Kappadokien 138 F2 Alacahan R?L? han with ancient remains TIB Kappadokien 138 H1 Analib(l)a RL Hasanova? RE; Bryer 1985, 25, 31 § Bubalia L § Dalana? § Dar(a)nalis B3 Anisa HR Kara Eyük / Kültepe Cumont 1932 C4 Antitaurus M. HRL Antitaurus TIB Kappadokien 143 D4 Arabissos/ CRL Afşin, formerly Yarpuz TIB Kappadokien 144, 264 Tripotamos F2 Arane A?HRL Akçakale TIB Kappadokien 146 § Aranda §Arangae B2 Arapözü L ruins to S TIB Kappadokien 147 B3 Arasaxa RL Akmesçit, formerly TIB Kappadokien 147 § Arathia Zerezek MAP 64 CAESAREA-MELITENE 987 Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location Reference F4 Arca RL Akcadağ, formerly Arga RE Arka 4; TIB Kappadokien 152 §Karmala? §(M)arkala? A3 Archalla R Erkilet? TIB Kappadokien 147 § Archelais G2 Arege RL? signal station, 8 miles Sinclair 1989a, 68 WNW Kemaliye A3 Argaeus M. RL S Caesarea RE ’Αργαῖον ὄρος G3 [Argaous] L Arguvan TIB Kappadokien 150 C3 Ariaratheia HRL Pınarbaşı, formerly Azizie TIB Kappadokien 151 C2 Armaxa R Gemerek? RE § Armaza G2 Armenia Minor HR RE H3 Arsanias fl. See Map 89 D3 Aşağı Kızıl Çevrek L? 11 miles NE Pınarbaşı von der Osten 1933, 123 H2 Aşutka RL? 3 miles N Dutluca T.B. Mitford B1 Azapbaşlı R?L ruins 1 mile N Azapbaşlı TIB Kappadokien 155 B4 Bagadania RL land S Argaeus M. TIB Kappadokien 178 G4 Bahçebaşı ARL 3 miles S Eski Malatya, TIB Kappadokien 249 formerly Orduzu D1 [Bathys Rhyax]/ L/ 8 miles SE Yıldızeli TIB Kappadokien 157-58 [Krya Pege]? L B3 Bünyan C Persian royal park Cook 1983, 180 Caesarea = Mazaka H1 Capotes? M. R Kurtlu Tepe RE; T.B. Mitford B2 Cappadocia CHRL RE Kappadokia B2 Cappadox? fl. See Map 63 Carsa(g)is = Chorsabia G4 Chabina fl. RL Cendere See Map 67 H1 Charax? RL Bozoğlak, formerly Ihtik RE 4; Mitford 1998 H1 Chorsabia/ RL Melik Şerif? Cumont 1906, 327; RE Carsa(g)is § Elegarsina RE Elegarsina H2 Chosomachon R?L Çemişgezek Howard-Johnston 1983, 255-56 Chryse = Comana B4 Cilicia HR around and NE Caesarea TIB Kappadokien 43 D4 Coduzalaba/ R/ Köy Yeri / Sarız? RE Sabalassos? R C4 Comana/ ACHRL Şar TIB Kappadokien 208-209 Hierapolis/ Chryse Comassa=Kamisa F3 Dalanda RL Darende? Ramsay 1890, 309-10 § Delendis H3 Dascusa RL Pağnik? TIB Kappadokien 169-70 § Daseusa § Dagousa C3 Dasmenda? RL Kuşkalesi RE; TIB Kappadokien 300-301 G1 Dastracus M. R Kızıl Dağ?, SE Nicopolis RE; Magie 1950, 1222; T.B. Mitford G4 Dulluk Tepe RL signal station, 2 miles SE Mitford 1980, 1186 Melitene C3 Ekrek R?L Köprübaşı, 30 miles E TIB Kappadokien 173 Kayseri H4 Elegeia R vicinity of Kömürhan RE 2 Erp(h)a = (H)Erp(h)a G2 Eski Arabkir RL ruins 2 miles NW Arabkir TIB Kappadokien 146 C3 Euagina/ RL vicinity of Gemerek RE Euagena Sebagena? § Eudagina 988 MAP 64 CAESAREA-MELITENE Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location Reference E1 Eudoixata R Tutmaç? RE § Eudoxiana? B2 Eulepa RL Gölova, formerly Palas TIB Kappadokien 137 § Aipolioi H1 Euphrates fl.
Recommended publications
  • Drip Tectonics and the Enigmatic Uplift of the Central Anatolian Plateau
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01611-3 OPEN Drip tectonics and the enigmatic uplift of the Central Anatolian Plateau Oğuz H. Göğüş 1, Russell N. Pysklywec2, A.M.C. Şengör1 & Erkan Gün 1,2 Lithospheric drips have been interpreted for various regions around the globe to account for the recycling of the continental lithosphere and rapid plateau uplift. However, the validity of such hypothesis is not well documented in the context of geological, geophysical and 1234567890 petrological observations that are tested against geodynamical models. Here we propose that the folding of the Central Anatolian (Kırşehir) arc led to thickening of the lithosphere and onset of “dripping” of the arc root. Our geodynamic model explains the seismic data showing missing lithosphere and a remnant structure characteristic of a dripping arc root, as well as enigmatic >1 km uplift over the entire plateau, Cappadocia and Galatia volcanism at the southern and northern plateau margins since ~10 Ma, respectively. Models show that arc root removal yields initial surface subsidence that inverts >1 km of uplift as the vertical loading and crustal deformation change during drip evolution. 1 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey. 2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3B1. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to O.H.G (email: [email protected]) NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8: 1538 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01611-3 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01611-3 he tectonic evolution of the Mediterranean involves a 2Ma—across entire Central Anatolia, although the rate and complex array of subduction, collision, and back-arc magnitude in the north and south is 5 and 10 times higher than in T 17 spreading events in relation to ongoing northward the central section of the plateau, respectively .
    [Show full text]
  • The Exiled Bishops of Constantinople from the Fourth to the Late Sixth Century
    Studia Ceranea 5, 2015, p. 231–247 ISSN: 2084-140X DOI: 10.18778/2084-140X.05.07 e-ISSN: 2449-8378 Rafał Kosiński (Białystok) The Exiled Bishops of Constantinople from the Fourth to the Late Sixth Century he existence of quick and efficient communication with the provincial territo- Tries was a matter of vital importance to Late-Antique Constantinople, the cap- ital city and the administrative centre of the Eastern Roman Empire. As a result, it became necessary to ensure the creation and maintenance of the land and sea routes linking the City with the provinces. The present article aims to examine which of those links, specifically by land or sea, facilitated a more rapid and conve- nient communication between the capital city and the more or less distant regions of the Empire, as exemplified by the various places of exile connected with the deposed bishops of Constantinople. Assuming that one of the key goals of sending someone into banishment would be to prevent them, as much as possible, from having any form of communication with the City, the location of the places to which they had been confined by the order of the authorities could indicate which method of contact would have potentially made it easier, or more difficult, for an exiled bishop to communicate with his followers at the capital1. In the early Byzantine period, the office of the Bishop of Constantinople was not a very secure position. Considering the time frame from the consecration of the City until the end of the sixth century, as many as 11 metropolitan bish- ops, in effect every third one, had been deposed from their office.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham (Hermit) 142F. Aristode 160 Acacius (Bishop Atarbius (Bishop Of
    INDEX Abraham (hermit) 142f. Aristode 160 Acacius (bishop Atarbius (bishop of Caesarea) 80f., 86f., of Neocaesarea) 109f., 127 91 Athanasius 63, 67ff., 75 Acacius (bishop Athanasius of Balad 156, 162 of Beroea) 142ff. Athenodorus (brother Aelianus 109 of Gregory al-Farabi 156 Thaumaturgus) 103, 105, Alexander (bishop 133 of Comana) I 26f., 129, Athens 120 132 Augustine 9-21, 70 Alexander (of the Cassiciacum Dialogues 9, 15ff. "Non-Sleepers" Corifessions 9-13, 15, monastery) 203, 211 18, 20f. Alexander (patriarch De beata vita 16ff. of Antioch) 144 De ordine 16ff. Alexander of Retractions 19 Abonoteichos 41 Soliloquies 19f. Alexander Severus Aurelian (emperor (emperor 222-235) 47 270-275) 121 Alexandria 37, 39f., 64, Auxentios 205 82, 101, 104, 120, Babai 172 n. II, 126f., 129 173ff. n. 92, 143, Babylas 70 156, 215 Baghdad 156 Alexandrian Christology 68 Bardesanism/Bardesanites 147 Amaseia 128 Barhadbeshabba 'Arbaya 145 Ambrose 70, 91 Barnabas 203 n. 39 Basil of Caeserea 109f., 117, Anastasios (monk) 207 121ff., 126f., Anastasius (= Magundat) 171 131, 157, Ancyra 113 166 Andrew Kalybites 207 Basilides 32, 37ff. Andrew the Fool 203 Beroea 141, 142 Annisa 112f. Berytus 101, 103f., Antioch 82, 105, 120 I I If., 155, 160, 215 Caesarea (Cappadocia) 129 Antiochene theology 72f., 143 Caesarea (Palestine) 80ff., 87, Antiochos the African 205 91, 92, 100, Antony 63,69f., 101, 103ff., 75f. 120 Antony / Antoninus Cappadocia 46ff., 53, (pupil of Lucian) 65 122 Apelles 51 Carpocrates 32, 39, 41 Arius/ Arianism/ Arians 65ff., 80ff., Carthage 47,49, 51, 92, 148 53ff., 57f. 224 INDEX Cataphrygian(s) 50ff., 56, 59 David of Thessalonike 205 Chaereas (comes) 140 Dcmosthenes (vicarius Chalcedon 75 of Pontica) III Chosroes II 17Iff., 175, Diogenes (bishop 177, I 79f., of Edessa) 144 182, 184, Dionysius (pope 259~269) 106 188 Doctrina Addai 91 n.
    [Show full text]
  • Malatya Ili Maden Ve Enerji Kaynaklari
    MALATYA İLİ MADEN VE ENERJİ KAYNAKLARI Malatya ili, Doğu Anadolu Bölgesinin gerek sanayi gerekse yer altı kaynakları bakımından önemli bir kentidir. Yöre sahip olduğu jeolojik yapı gereği çeşitli maden yatakları oluşumu için uygun bir ortam sunmaktadır. Genel Müdürlüğümüzün il ve yakın çevresinde yaptığı çalışmalarla bölgenin endüstriyel hammadde ve metalik maden yatak ve zuhurları ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Ülkemizin tek, dünyanın da sayılı yataklarından biri olan profillit yatağı Pütürge'de bulunmaktadır. Metalik maden yönüyle, bu yöre demir ve bakır yönüyle zengindir. Pütürge’de bulunan profillit yatağı Genel Müdürlüğümüzün yaptığı çalışmalar sonucu ortaya çıkarılmış ve özel sektöre devredilmiştir. Halen işletilen yataklarda seramik ve refrakter kalitede toplam 20.221.700 ton görünür+muhtemel rezerv ortaya konmuştur. Ayrıca ilimizde dolomit, florit, vermikülit, tras, mermer ve çimento hammaddeleri bulunmaktadır. Türkiye’nin en önemli demir yataklarından bazıları bu bölgede bulunmaktadır. Hekimhan- Hasançelebi demir yatağında % 15 Fe tenörlü 865 milyon ton görünür + muhtemel rezerv, Hekimhan-Deveci % 38-52 Fe tenörlü toplam 40 milyon ton, Hekimhan-Karakuz’da % 40-55 Fe tenörlü 14.5 milyon ton rezerv bulunmaktadır. Sorunlu demir yataklarımızın toplam potansiyelinin yarısından fazlasını oluşturan Hasançelebi Demir Yatağı yüksek titan içeriği nedeniyle işletilememektedir. MTA laboratuvarlarında yapılan teknoloji deneylerinde, Hasançelebi cevheri manyetik ayırma yöntemiyle kolayca zenginleştirilebildiği halde, cevherin titan içeriği yüksek fırınlar için istenilen % 0.5’in altına düşürülememiştir. Bununla birlikte, MTA laboratuvarlarında Hasançelebi cevherlerinden sünger demir elde edilmiştir. Mn içeriği ortalama % 3.7 olan Deveci Demir Yatağı’nın oksitli kesimleri işletilmiş, karbonatlı cevherlerden zaman zaman üretimler devam etmektedir. BAKIR-KURŞUN-ÇİNKO (Cu-Pb-Zn) Yeşilyurt-Görgü Sahası Tenör : % 19.8 Zn, % 6 Pb Rezerv :4.000 görünür, 2.000 muhtemel, 4.000 ton mümkün rezerv.
    [Show full text]
  • Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early
    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses X Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early Byzantine periods An international video conference on the southeastern part of central Anatolia in classical antiquity May 14-15, 2020 / Izmir, Turkey Edited by Ergün Laflı Izmir 2020 Last update: 04/05/2020. 1 Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early Byzantine periods. Papers presented at the international video conference on the southeastern part of central Anatolia in classical antiquity, May 14-15, 2020 / Izmir, Turkey, Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea – Acta congressus communis omnium gentium Smyrnae. Copyright © 2020 Ergün Laflı (editor) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission from the editor. ISBN: 978-605-031-211-9. Page setting: Ergün Laflı (Izmir). Text corrections and revisions: Hugo Thoen (Deinze / Ghent). Papers, presented at the international video conference, entitled “Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early Byzantine periods. An international video conference on the southeastern part of central Anatolia in classical antiquity” in May 14–15, 2020 in Izmir, Turkey. 36 papers with 61 pages and numerous colourful figures. All papers and key words are in English. 21 x 29,7 cm; paperback; 40 gr. quality paper. Frontispiece. A Roman stele with two portraits in the Museum of Kırşehir; accession nos. A.5.1.95a-b (photograph by E.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Phrygian Monuments
    256 SOME PHRYGIAN MONUMENTS. SOME PHRYGIAN MONUMENTS. [PL. XXVI.—XXIX.] OF the five Phrygian monuments now published from the drawings of Mr. A. C. Blunt, No. 4 on PL XXVIII. may be assigned to an early period of Phrygian history. It has been already pub- lished by Steuart, Anc. Monum.; but like all his drawings, this is very incorrect and gives an inaccurate idea of the original.1 The monument is at Yapuldak (see the map in last number of this Journal). There was at this place a town or fortification of some kind on the top of a hill, which rises about 200 feet above the plain. The western side of the hill is a precipice of rock, and on all other sides it is very steep. On the western side an underground staircase cut in the rock leads down to the plain: a similar one at Pishmish Kalessi has already been men- tioned above, p. 6. Near this staircase there is a doorway leading into a small rock-chamber, from which another door in the opposite wall leads into a second chamber, larger than the first. At the back of the second chamber a door admits into a third chamber, and in the back of this third chamber there is a door or window which looks out over the precipice to the west. One can step out through this window and stand on a ledge about eighteen inches wide; and this is the only way to get a near view of the carved front which is now given according to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arsenite Schism and the Babai Rebellion: Two Case Studies
    THE ARSENITE SCHISM AND THE BABAI REBELLION: TWO CASE STUDIES IN CENTER-PERIPHERY RELATIONS by Hüsamettin ŞİMŞİR Submitted to the Institute of Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Sabancı University June 2018 © Hüsamettin Şimşir 2018 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT THE ARSENITE SCHISM AND THE BABAI REBELLION: TWO CASE STUDIES IN CENTER-PERIPHERY RELATIONS Hüsamettin Şimşir M.A Thesis, June 2018 Thesis Supervisor: Dr. Fac. Member Ferenc Péter Csirkés This thesis aims to present an analysis of the interaction between Christians and Muslims in the west of Asia Minor at the end of the 13th and the beginning of the 14th centuries after two religious-social movements in the Byzantine and the Rum Seljuk Empires, the Arsenite Schism and the Babai Rebellion. After the unsuccessful rebellion of the Babais, antinomian dervishes who had migrated to the west of Asia Minor because of a heavy oppression as well as inquisition by the state and had a different religious belief apart from the mainstream religious understanding of the center initiated missionary activities in the regions along the Byzantine border. Accordingly, these dervishes had joined the military activities of the Turcoman chieftains against the Byzantines and interacted with the local Christian population and religious figures. As a result of this religious interaction, messianic and ascetic beliefs were increasingly present among the Greek-speaking population as well as spiritual leaders of western Anatolia. Since such interfaith and cross- cultural interaction had a considerable impact on the course of all these events, this thesis focuses on them to create a better understanding of the appearance of the Hesychasm in the Byzantine spiritual environment in the later period.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000
    MiReKoc MIGRATION RESEARCH PROGRAM AT THE KOÇ UNIVERSITY ______________________________________________________________ MiReKoc Research Projects 2005-2006 Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000 Census Results Yadigar Coşkun Address: Kırkkonoaklar Mah. 202. Sokak Utku Apt. 3/1 06610 Çankaya Ankara / Turkey Email: [email protected] Tel: +90. 312.305 1115 / 146 Fax: +90. 312. 311 8141 Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu 34450 Sarıyer Istanbul Turkey Tel: +90 212 338 1635 Fax: +90 212 338 1642 Webpage: www.mirekoc.com E.mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Abstract....................................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures and Tables .......................................................................................................................4 Selected Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1 2. Literature Review and Possible Data Sources on International Migration..........................................6 2.1 Data Sources on International Migration Data in Turkey..............................................................6 2.2 Studies on International Migration in Turkey..............................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • ROUTES and COMMUNICATIONS in LATE ROMAN and BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (Ca
    ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY TÜLİN KAYA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY JULY 2020 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Dr. D. Burcu ERCİYAS Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Suna GÜVEN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lale ÖZGENEL (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ufuk SERİN (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşe F. EROL (Hacı Bayram Veli Uni., Arkeoloji) Assist. Prof. Dr. Emine SÖKMEN (Hitit Uni., Arkeoloji) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Tülin Kaya Signature : iii ABSTRACT ROUTES AND COMMUNICATIONS IN LATE ROMAN AND BYZANTINE ANATOLIA (ca. 4TH-9TH CENTURIES A.D.) Kaya, Tülin Ph.D., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor : Assoc. Prof. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006/07 By-Laws, Rules & List of Correspondents
    2006/07 BOARD OF DIRECTORS as of January 1, 2006 Chairman Paul Sa Standard Shipping, Inc. THE AMERICAN CLUB Deputy James P. Sweeney Penn Maritime Inc. BY-LAWS, RULES & Chairman Vassilios Bacolitsas Sea Pioneer Shipping Corp. LIST OF CORRESPONDENTS Lawrence J. Bowles Nourse & Bowles, LLP Calvin W.S. Cheng Eastmark Associates, Inc. Keith Denholm Pacific Carriers Limited Kenneth T. Engstrom International Shipping Partners Samuel A. Giberga Hornbeck Offshore Operators, LLC George D. Gourdomichalis Free Bulkers S.A. Robert A. Guthans R G Company, LLC Chih-Chien Hsu Eddie Steamship Company, Ltd. Markos K. Marinakis Marinakis Chartering Inc. Hariklia N. Moundreas Good Faith Shipping Company S.A. Michael L. Murley Martin Resource Mgmt. Corp. Martin C. Recchuite Victor S. Restis Enterprises Shipping & Trading S.A. Steven T. Scalzo Foss Maritime Company George Vakirtzis Polembros Shipping Limited Jonathan C. Wales Reinauer Transportation Companies J. Arnold Witte Donjon Marine Co., Inc. Servet Yardimci Yardimci Group Secretary Joseph E. M. Hughes Manager SHIPOWNERS CLAIMS BUREAU, INC. 60 Broad Street – 37th Floor New York, New York 10004 U.S.A. Tel: +1.212.847.4500 Fax: +1.212.847.4599 Website: www.american-club.com SHIPOWNERS CLAIMS BUREAU (UK) LTD. PACIFIC MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC. London Liaison Office 100 Webster Street, Suite 300 3rd Floor, Latham House Oakland, CA 94607 U.S.A. 16 Minories Tel: +1.510.452.1186 London EC3N 1AX U.K. Fax: +1.510.452.1267 Tel: + 44.20.7709.1390 Fax: + 44.20.7709.1399 Claims Fax: + 44.20.7709.1350 SHIPOWNERS CLAIMS BUREAU (HELLAS) INC. 51 Akti Miaouli – 4th Floor Piraeus 185 36 Greece Tel: +30.210.429.4990/1/2/3 Fax: +30.210.429.4187/88 E-mail: [email protected] 1 MANAGEMENT (NEW YORK) CLAIMS – FREIGHT, DEMURRAGE & DEFENSE (NEW YORK) DIRECT LINE AFTER HOURS DIRECT LINE AFTER HOURS JOSEPH E.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of St Anna's Cult in Byzantium
    ASPECTS OF ST ANNA’S CULT IN BYZANTIUM by EIRINI PANOU A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham January 2011 Acknowledgments It is said that a PhD is a lonely work. However, this thesis, like any other one, would not have become reality without the contribution of a number of individuals and institutions. First of all of my academical mother, Leslie Brubaker, whose constant support, guidance and encouragement accompanied me through all the years of research. Of the National Scholarship Foundation of Greece ( I.K.Y.) with its financial help for the greatest part of my postgraduate studies. Of my father George, my mother Angeliki and my bother Nick for their psychological and financial support, and of my friends in Greece (Lily Athanatou, Maria Sourlatzi, Kanela Oikonomaki, Maria Lemoni) for being by my side in all my years of absence. Special thanks should also be addressed to Mary Cunningham for her comments on an early draft of this thesis and for providing me with unpublished material of her work. I would like also to express my gratitude to Marka Tomic Djuric who allowed me to use unpublished photographic material from her doctoral thesis. Special thanks should also be addressed to Kanela Oikonomaki whose expertise in Medieval Greek smoothened the translation of a number of texts, my brother Nick Panou for polishing my English, and to my colleagues (Polyvios Konis, Frouke Schrijver and Vera Andriopoulou) and my friends in Birmingham (especially Jane Myhre Trejo and Ola Pawlik) for the wonderful time we have had all these years.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Iconography in Byzantine Cappadocia
    RESEARCH ARTICLE European Journal of Theology and Philosophy www.ej-theology.org Aspects of Iconography in Byzantine Cappadocia E. Ene D-Vasilescu ABSTRACT The main novelty my article brings concerns a particular iconographic motif: that known as the ‘trial by the water of reproach’. In the few cases Published Online: August 17, 2021 where this is rendered, usually only Mary is presented as undergoing this ISSN: 2736-5514 test, but in Cappadocian art Joseph is also subjected to it. DOI :10.24018/theology.2021.1.4.35 Additionally, to this visual topic, another one that is rarely depicted will be introduced and commented upon: that known as ‘Christ’s first bath’. E. Ene D-Vasilescu* I will provide a particular example: the fresco which constitutes part of (e-mail: elena.ene-yahoo.co.uk) the decoration that embellishes the walls of Karabaş Kilise/ ‘The Big Church’ in Soğanlı Valley, southern Cappadocia. *Corresponding Author A few images – one of them never published before – have been included within this publication. Keywords: Byzantium, Byzantine frescoes, Cappadocia, Constantine VII Porphyrogenetus. Karabaş church in the Soğanlı Valley, Phocas family, the Old and New Tokalı churches in Göreme. Cappadocians occupied a region from Mount Taurus (Fig. 1) I. INTRODUCTION to the vicinity of the Pontus Euxine (the Black Sea) [1]. The current piece is concerned with two rare visual motifs Therefore, the province was bordered in the south by the that can be found among other images which decorate Taurus Mountains that separate it from Cilicia to the east by churches established in Cappadocia under Byzantine rule.
    [Show full text]