Investing in Agricultural Land Is More Profitable Than Investing in Other Real Estate in Serbia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investing in Agricultural Land Is More Profitable Than Investing in Other Real Estate in Serbia Investing in agricultural land is more profitable than investing in other real estate in Serbia The pandemic has shown that investing in agricultural land in Serbia is even more profitable than investing in other real estate, except in parts of large cities where the price of construction land and apartments has also increased drastically. What agricultural and construction land have in common is that prices are constantly rising. The statistics of the Republic Geodetic Authority show large differences in the price of both agricultural and construction land. When it comes to traded construction land, where 76 percent of turnover was paid in euros, and 24 percent in dinars, in 2020, prices ranged from 10 euros per acre, to over 80,000 euros per acre. The lowest prices, where the acre cost 10 euros, were recorded in Sjenica and Aleksinac, and the euro was more expensive in Sabac, Mladenovac, Obrenovac, Jagodina, Paracin, Prokuplje and Bor. Land in Sopot (12 euros), Gornji Milanovac (13), Knjazevac (13), Sokobanja (15), Valjevo (15), Kragujevac (16), Leskovac (16), Grocka was bought for less than 20 euros (17), Krusevac (17), Cacak (17), Lazarevac (18), Bajina Basta (19) and Zrenjanin (19 euros). The most expensive is Belgrade. Investments in construction land pay off In 2020, slightly less than half of the traded construction land (45%) had an area of two to ten acres, 43% more than 10 acres, 8% had an area of up to two acres and 3% had an area of over one hectare. In the conversation with the owners of real estate and land sales agencies, it can be heard that investments in construction land pay off very well, because the money can be turned over faster. “Everyone who has excess money buys. In Vojvodina, fields are sold the most, and in the rest of Serbia, orchards and vineyards. The most expensive land is in Vojvodina, where the highest quality land is in Backa, which has the highest price, followed by Srem, and then Banat in third place. Once a piece of land was bought for a casserole of fish, and today, by God, that has changed, it’s worth a fortune,” says one of the agents from Novi Sad. The greater the economic freedom to invest, the more successful the nation will be, says Milan Kovacevic, an investment consultant. He reminds that it is one thing to invest, and something completely different to use the investment and make money out of it. “Unfortunately, investing in construction land in our country is often connected with corruption, and that should change. We had numerous situations that indicated that, and I am afraid that we, as a state, are constantly making mistakes. It happens that something that is free becomes private construction land, that land that is agricultural is bought, that is magically renamed construction, that an individual becomes so rich, and the state is at a loss,” Milan Kovacevic points out. Companies from other industries also invest in agriculture According to Aleksandar Bogunovic, Secretary of the Association for Plant Production and Food Industry of the Serbian Chamber of Commerce, the state has passed a number of regulations in the past thirty years that have enabled the development of the agricultural Investing in agricultural land is more profitable than investing in other real estate in Serbia land market. They primarily refer to the abolition of the land maximum, leasing of state agricultural land, reduction of taxes on the transfer of absolute rights, and even “ad hoc” incentive measures for purchase and lease and reduction of interest during the purchase. In that way, the demand for the purchase of agricultural land increased, and thus its price. “We are an agricultural country and investors from the non-agricultural sector invest part of their funds due to business diversification in agriculture, and in many cases immediately after their activity in agriculture, primarily in agricultural land. Agricultural companies and farmers who have a surplus of funds are also investing, and they are investing part of those funds in the purchase of agricultural land, increasing their holdings,” says Aleksandar Bogunovic. Data from the Republic Geodetic Authority for last year show that the highest average price of 10,300 euros in trade in agricultural land was realized in the Juznobacki district. In the last three years, the price of agricultural land in Serbia has grown by about five to seven percent a year. What affects price differences And what are the average prices per hectare? The difference from north to south is fivefold. Thus, in the North Backa district, the average price per hectare was 9,650 euros, the West Backa district 8,250 euros, the Srem district 8,500 euros, while the Belgrade region recorded 4,200 euros, Sumadija and Western Serbia 3,350 euros, and southern and eastern Serbia 2,750 euros per hectare. Of course, this is an average, which means that the prices were higher, but also lower. The large range of prices of agricultural land by regions in Serbia is conditioned by numerous factors that affect the price. Although agricultural land is good of general interest, it is in free circulation in Serbia (except for the right of pre-emption), so the market affects the price of arable land. “The relationship between supply and demand has an impact on the price, and the demand in certain regions is much higher than the supply, so the price of agricultural land in those regions is growing, and in the last twenty years almost continuously. The most important factors that affect the price of agricultural land are the locations where the agricultural land is located, so we have agricultural land that is of poorer quality, but is close to a large city or an infrastructure facility with a high price. Then its quality, as well as the size and shape of the plot,” points out Bogunovic. Larger land area is more expensive In most cases, our interlocutor points out – and this is especially true for new investors who want to buy a larger area – agricultural land of 20-50 hectares is generally more expensive than small plots. Except for a few exceptions, where farmers who have their own land want to buy a neighboring plot. Bogunovic cites an example from the vicinity of Leskovac, where agricultural land with an area of one hectare was paid 100,000 euros. Investing in agricultural land is more profitable than investing in other real estate in Serbia “But certainly the price of agricultural land decreases if you offer 1,000 ha or 5,000 ha or 10,000 ha, because the competition is much smaller, since you don’t have many people who can buy such large areas. The price is also affected by the condition of the infrastructure – roads, availability of electricity, irrigation, drainage. The impact of the demographic situation is not small either. In eastern Serbia or in the hilly and mountainous parts of Serbia, where the population is very rare, the price of agricultural land is low, although in a good part this is not the only factor that affects how much it will cost,” says Aleksandar Bogunovic. Agricultural heritage also dictates the price Comparing the average rent of agricultural land in Serbia and EU countries, Serbia is in the middle. Thirteen countries have higher rents, and 14 countries have lower rents compared to Serbia. The highest average rent in the Netherlands is 3.7 times higher than in Serbia, but it is a significantly smaller difference compared to the difference in the purchase price of agricultural land. The amount of rent in Serbia is five times higher than in Latvia, where the rent is the lowest among EU countries. The price of agricultural land is influenced by numerous factors, so if we analyze these factors, ie if we compare them by countries, we will get reasons why the price of agricultural land in Serbia is higher than in the countries of the region. “Serbia is traditionally an agricultural country. In Serbia and the countries of the former Yugoslavia, there were a large number of farmers during the socialist era who cultivated their land, unlike the neighboring countries of the Eastern bloc, where the population did not have their own land. So a good part of the heirs continued to be engaged in agriculture. For example, in Bulgaria, after the return of agricultural land, most people did not know or had the mechanization to engage in agriculture, so in the beginning, that agricultural land was in the parlor, and then companies bought it cheaply, before entering the EU. Also, in these countries, the demographic picture has drastically changed with the entry into the EU, because people have been given the opportunity to work in more developed countries,” concludes Aleksandar Bogunovic. However, the price of agricultural land in the countries of our neighbors that are members of the EU has also increased significantly in recent years. Primarily due to the construction of infrastructure and incentives that are significantly higher than before, so investing in the purchase of agricultural land is more profitable. Serbia is following this trend as well, eKapija reports..
Recommended publications
  • TROFEJ OBRENOVCA 2009" Obrenovac, 6.12.2009 KLUBOVI UČESNICI
    21. KARATE TURNIR "TROFEJ OBRENOVCA 2009" Obrenovac, 6.12.2009 KLUBOVI UČESNICI 1.014 - Valjevo 44. Aranđelovac - Aranđelovac 2. Kraljevski KK No-Kači - Beograd 45. Radnički - Obrenovac 3. Čukarica - Beograd 46. Gučevo - Gučevo 4. Samuraj - Beograd 47. Žandarmerija - Beograd 5. Slobodan Vučinić - Beograd 48. Evropa - Beograd 6. Sensei - Šabac 49. Milanovac - Gornji Milanovac 7. Šampioni - Bijeljina 50. Čukarički Roda - Beograd 8. Ipon - Požega 51. Nippon - Beograd 9. Foke - Beograd 10. K. Mitrovica - K. Mitrovica 11. Policajac - Beograd 12. Vitez - Beograd 13. Barič - Barič 14. Mladost - Šabac 15. Radnički - Beograd 16. Naftagas - Novi Sad 17. Obrenovac - Obrenovac 18. Borac - Čačak 19. Šotokan - Loznica 20. Ada - Valjevo 21. Arena - Beograd 22. Jedinstvo - Smederevo 23. Lotos - Smederevo 24. FAP - Priboj 25. Umka - Umka 26. Palež - Obrenovac 27. Jadar - Draginac 28. Loznica - Loznica 29. Ipon - Inđija 30. GSP Beograd Polet - Beograd 31. Užice - Užice 32. MB Sport Klub - Beograd 33. Mladost - Pančevo 34. Zlatibor-Čigota - Čajetina 35. Mladenovac - Mladenovac 36. Ronin - Beograd 37. Diplomatic - Beograd 38. Šampion - Pirot 39. Sunce - Beograd 40. Šabac - Šabac 41. Soko Štark - Beograd 42. Šid - Šid 43. Fortuna - Požega 21. KARATE TURNIR "TROFEJ OBRENOVCA 2009" Obrenovac, 6.12.2009 USPEŠNOST KLUBOVA (po broju bodova) Ukupno: 1 . Samuraj - Beograd 66 2 . Umka - Umka 47 3 . Mladenovac - Mladenovac 47 4 . FAP - Priboj 43 5 . Zlatibor-Čigota - Čajetina 37 6 . Radnički - Obrenovac 33 7 . Sunce - Beograd 32 8 . K. Mitrovica - K. Mitrovica 29 9 . Gučevo - Gučevo 28 10 . Čukarički Roda - Beograd 24 11 . Šampioni - Bijeljina 22 12 . Foke - Beograd 22 13 . Diplomatic - Beograd 21 14 . 014 - Valjevo 21 15 . Čukarica - Beograd 20 16 .
    [Show full text]
  • SERBIE G R I E (Plus De 1 100 000 Hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ V
    vers BUDAPEST 20° vers BÉKÉSCSABA vers BUDAPEST vers ORADEA 22° 21° vers BUCAREST Capitale d'État SERBIE G R I E (plus de 1 100 000 hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ v. BUDAPEST 19° NADLAC ARAD Plus de 200 000 hab. E PÉCS B Plus de 100 000 hab. ) SÂNNICOLAU MARE Mures U A N Kanjiza A N 46° D U Subotica Novi R LIPOVA Plus de 50 000 hab. D vers CRAIOVA ( nca Knezevac ra A 46° MOHÁCS BAČKA DU NORD K B A N A T r Coka O Plus de 25 000 hab. i B A Č K A v a a ic j Senta t a a D E L ’ O U E S T l D U N O R D Z Plus de 10 000 hab. Bačka Topola Kikinda U BELI MANASTIR Ada (SEVERNI JIMBOLIA vers VARAZDIN Sombor (SEVERNA BAČKA) Autre ville ou localité I I BANAT) I a DRA I g V I Mali Idos TIMISOARA e M E I B I V I e Crvenka ( li I k Nova D i I VOÏVODINE I Pirot Chef-lieu d'okrug (district) R k I Crnja A I a (province autonome) Apatin n Kula s I LUGOS V a I i j A I l I m ) M e i (Z A P A D N A I Becej Novi Becej l T OSIJEK I I I g a I a I I e n A Autoroute a l I I I B k i CRAIOVA B A Č K A) I I I i I I I I Vrbas I I I r I i T ta k k I S s a I I j vers I e n S g Srbobran B A I N A T a A e Route principale I CRUCENI l B Odzaci I BAČKAI DU SUD C R O A T I E GATAIA I Bîrza v a Zitiste N I s i V I u D Temerin ka Backi A Bac m Route secondaire N I C E N T R A L a DETA ( I D Petrovac U I T U B I I N Zabali Boka E I I Secanj VINKOVCI A I I I V Zrenjanin Autre route VUKOVAR I ) Novi Sad I I (SREDNJI BANAT) I I vers ZAGREB I I I I JAMU (JUŽNI BAČKA) I Backa Palanka Plandiste Futog K I MARE Titel a I Voie ferrée n I B a l I o sut Beocin D I u E I 641 vers CRAIOVA n D a
    [Show full text]
  • PUTARINA) Važi Od: 25
    Beograd, Bul. Kraqa Aleksandra 282 POSEBNA NAKNADA ZA UPOTREBU AUTOPUTA (PUTARINA) važi od: 25. februara 2021. god. u 07:00 h (po kusnoj listi NBS br. 173 od 10.09.2018. god.) BEOGRAD PUTARINA u RSD ROAD TOLL in EUR Deonica: Beograd - Preševo I-а I II III IV Naplatne stanice I-а I II III IV 40 80 120 230 460 MALI POŽAREVAC 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 4,00 50 100 160 310 630 UMČARI 0,50 1,00 1,50 3,00 5,50 70 130 190 390 770 VODANJ 1,00 1,50 2,00 3,50 7,00 80 150 230 460 930 KOLARI 1,00 1,50 2,00 4,00 8,00 90 180 270 540 1.070 SMEDEREVO 1,00 2,00 2,50 5,00 9,50 90 180 280 550 1.110 POŽAREVAC 1,00 2,00 2,50 5,00 9,50 150 300 460 910 1.830 VELIKA PLANA 1,50 3,00 4,00 8,00 15,50 180 350 530 1.060 2.120 MARKOVAC 2,00 3,00 4,50 9,00 18,00 190 380 570 1.140 2.280 LAPOVO 2,00 3,50 5,00 10,00 19,50 200 400 590 1.190 2.370 BATOČINA 2,00 3,50 5,00 10,50 20,50 250 490 730 1.460 2.920 JAGODINA 2,50 4,50 6,50 12,50 25,00 270 540 810 1.620 3.230 ĆUPRIJA 2,50 5,00 7,00 14,00 27,50 290 580 880 1.750 3.500 PARAĆIN 2,50 5,00 7,50 15,00 30,00 320 630 950 1.900 3.800 POJATE 3,00 5,50 8,50 16,50 32,50 350 690 1.030 2.060 4.120 RAŽANJ 3,00 6,00 9,00 17,50 35,00 390 770 1.160 2.310 4.630 ALEKSINAČKI RUDNICI 3,50 7,00 10,00 20,00 39,50 400 790 1.190 2.380 4.750 ALEKSINAC 3,50 7,00 10,50 20,50 40,50 450 890 1.340 2.680 5.360 NIŠ jug 4,00 8,00 11,50 23,00 45,50 460 920 1.380 2.750 5.500 MEROŠINA 4,00 8,00 12,00 23,50 46,50 480 960 1.440 2.880 5.770 DOLJEVAC SELO 4,50 8,50 12,50 24,50 49,00 500 990 1.480 2.960 5.920 BRESTOVAC 4,50 8,50 13,00 25,50 50,50 510 1.020 1.520
    [Show full text]
  • Šifra Naziv Mesto/Opština Plaćeno
    Šifra Naziv Mesto/Opština Plaćeno 1 STANIČIĆ ĐORĐE ARANĐELOVAC 24,000.00 2 PANTELIĆ SLAVIŠA ARANĐELOVAC 24,000.00 3 STOJANOVIĆ RADMILA ARANĐELOVAC 24,000.00 4 ĐORĐEVIĆ DRAGICA BATOČINA 24,000.00 5 DRENJANIN DOBRILA BEOGRAD 24,000.00 6 ŽIVKOVIĆ BUDIMIR BEOGRAD MLADENOVAC 24,000.00 7 ĐURĐEVIĆ VIDOSAVA BEOGRAD MLADENOVAC 24,000.00 8 PAUNOVIĆ SLOBODAN BEOGRAD MLADENOVAC 24,000.00 9 SRETENOVIĆ DUŠICA BEOGRAD MLADENOVAC 24,000.00 10 BERAJ SEVDIJA BEOGRAD MLADENOVAC 24,000.00 11 BEJZAKU ĐULIJANA BEOGRAD MLADENOVAC 24,000.00 12 HAMZIĆ SUZANA BEOGRAD MLADENOVAC 24,000.00 13 DENČIĆ DEJAN BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 14 JOVANOVIĆ VOJISLAV BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 15 GRAŠIĆ ŽIVOJIN BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 16 VAŠALIĆ DUŠKA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 17 JANIĆIJEVIĆ MILENA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 18 PAVKOVIĆ TANJA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 19 JOCIĆ STANIŠA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 20 SPAHIĆ SNEŽANA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 21 MARJANOVIĆ MIRSADA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 22 MARINKOVIĆ MIROSLAV BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 23 MORINA SMILJANA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 24 NIKOLIĆ NIŠA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 72,000.00 25 ŠABANOVIĆ SAFET BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 26 TODOROVIĆ MILAN BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 27 STANIMIROVIĆ SNEŽANA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 28 PETRULJEVIĆ PERA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 29 JOVIČIĆ MILORAD BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 30 ČOLAKOVIĆ LJLJANA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 31 JOVANOV SVETLANA BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 32 NIKOLIĆ ČEDOMIR BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 48,000.00 33 SMOLOVIĆ BLAGOJE BEOGRAD RAKOVICA 24,000.00 34 GAŠIĆ ZVONKO
    [Show full text]
  • List of Hauliers Serbia 10 Oct 10
    Report on issued ECMT licences to Serbian hauliers for 2010 ECMT licences for EURO III safe lorries ECMT licence No Issued to haulier 1 Radivojev DOO,Vrbas 2 Yuba-Radomir Mišković i drugi o.d, Beograd 3 Astra SB d.o.o, Surčin-Beograd 4 Macko d.o.o, Odžaci 5 Marjanović Trans d.o.o, Futog 6 Marjanović Trans d.o.o, Futog 7 Silo Jeličić d.o.o,Požega 8 Silo Jeličić d.o.o,Požega 9 ISCO d.o.o, Zrenjanin 10 Banex Trans,Beograd 11 Teoma Transport d.o.o, Novi Beograd 12 Teoma Transport d.o.o, Novi Beograd 13 STS-Trans DOO,Kanjiža 14 Alex Internacional d.o.o, Niš 15 Bugarinović Transport d.o.o, Novi Sad 16 Bugarinović Transport d.o.o, Novi Sad 17 Braća Crnomarković,Stari Banovci 18 Braća Crnomarković,Stari Banovci 19 Braća Crnomarković,Stari Banovci 20 Popović Transport d.o.o, Obrovac 21 Dunis DOO,Futog 22 Dunis DOO,Futog 23 Dunis DOO,Futog 24 Dunis DOO,Futog 25 Dunis DOO,Futog 26 MB Transporte d.o.o, Malo Vojlovce-Lebane 27 NN Borović d.o.o, Ivanjica 28 Cvetković d.o.o, Novi Sad 29 Grade Trans d.o.o, Čačak 30 Trgo-Auto d.o.o, Srbobran 31 Unitrag Pižon,Beograd 32 Unitrag Pižon,Beograd 33 Srboexport Transport d.o.o,Obrenovac 34 Koncern Srboexport d.o.o Beograd, Obrenovac-Zabrežje 35 Koncern Srboexport d.o.o Beograd, Obrenovac-Zabrežje 36 Koncern Srboexport d.o.o Beograd, Obrenovac-Zabrežje 37 Koncern Srboexport d.o.o Beograd, Obrenovac-Zabrežje 38 Tim-Trade GVB d.o.o, Raška 39 Magazin-Transport d.o.o,Kruševac 40 Partnertrans,Novi Sad 41 Partnertrans,Novi Sad 42 Partnertrans,Novi Sad 43 Partnertrans,Novi Sad 44 Bata d.o.o,Trešnjevac 45 Bata d.o.o,Trešnjevac
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Plan of Action (Epoa) Serbia: Floods
    P a g e | 1 Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Serbia: Floods DREF Operation n° MDRRS014 Glide n°: FF2020-00158-SRB Expected timeframe: 4 months Date of issue: 10 July 2020 Expected end date: 30 November 2020 Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 313,953 Total number of people affected: 52,745 Number of people to be 20,256 assisted: Provinces affected: 24 Provinces targeted: 20 Host National Societypresence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): Red Cross of Serbia (RCS) with 222 volunteers and 83 staff in the branches of Arilje, Blace, Cacak, Despotovac, Doljevac, Gornji Milanovac, Ivanjica, Koceljeva, Kosjeric, Krusevac, Kursumlija, Lucani, Majdanpek, Osecina, Pozega, Prokuplje, Zitoradja, Kraljevo, Ljubovija, Trstenik, Krupanj, Obrenovac, Bajina Basta, Vladimirci. Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: N/A Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: Sector for emergency of the Ministry of Interior, members of the Municipal Emergency Response headquarters (municipal emergency services), Serbian Armed Forces, local public companies. A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster For two weeks before the date of the disaster, which occurred on 22-24 June, the Republic of Serbia was affected by heavy rainfalls. The most affected areas are Kolubarski, Moravicki, Raski, Zlatiborski, Rasinski, Toplicki, Jablanicki, and Pomoravski districts. 8 municipalities and cities reported on 22 June that were affected by heavy rain that caused flash floods and floods. It was reported that the municipalities of Osecina, Ljubovija, and Lucani are the most affected by heavy rain (more than 40 litres per square meter in 24 hours) leading to floods in the whole region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kosovo* Conflict
    UNEP The UNCHS UNEP UNCHS The Joint UNEP/UNCHS (Habitat) Balkans Task Force was OCTOBER 1999 established in early May 1999 when the Kosovo conflict was Kosovo still ongoing. In addition to the unfolding humanitarian crisis there was growing concern about the environmental and human settlement consequences of the conflict. Conflict The Kosovo Conflict Ð Consequences for the Environment & Human Settlements Force UNEP/UNCHS (Habitat) Balkans Task To address these issues, the Balkans Task Force mobilised an international and independent scientific team to work within Kosovo and at targeted industrial sites in Serbia. Similar teams visited pollution sources along the Danube River, as well as Consequences targets within National Parks and other protected areas. This report presents the findings of the Balkans Task Force. Immediate action is recommended at the Ôhot spotsÕ of environmental concern found in four cities. Conscious of the need for urgent action, the United Nations Environment Programme and the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements have acted to make the facts available as rapidly as possible. The result is a major contribution to for the Environment environmental assessment of modern warfare. UNEP/UNCHS (Habitat) Balkans Task Force UNEP UNCHS & Human Settlements First published in Switzerland in 1999 by the United Nations Environment Programme and the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) Copyright © 1999,United Nations Environment Programme and United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) ISBN 92-807-1801-1 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made.UNEP and UNCHS (Habitat) would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia 2Nd Periodical Report
    Strasbourg, 23 September 2010 MIN-LANG/PR (2010) 7 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Second periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter SERBIA The Republic of Serbia The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages The Second Periodical Report Submitted to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe Pursuant to Article 15 of the Charter Belgrade, September 2010 2 C O N T E N T S 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………6 2. Part I …………………………………………………………………………………12 2.1. Legislative and institutional changes after the first cycle of monitoring of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………….12 2.1.1. Legislative changes ……………………………………………………….12 2.1.2. The National Strategy for the Improvement of the Status of Roma ……..17 2.1.3. Judicial Reform …………………………………………………………...17 2.1.4. Establishment of the Ministry of Human and Minority Rights …………..23 2.2. Novelties expected during the next monitoring cycle of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………………………………….24 2.2.1. The Census ………………………………………………………………..24 2.2.2. Election of the national councils of the national minorities ……………...26 2.3. Implementation of the recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (RecChL(2009)2) 28) …………………………………………29 2.4. Activities for the implementation of the box-recommendation of the Committee of Experts with regard to the implementation of the Charter ………………………...33 3. PART II Implementation of Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………..38 3.1. Information on the policy, legislation and practice in the implementation of Part II - Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………………………………………..38 3.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia: Floods
    Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Serbia: Floods DREF Operation Operation n° MDRRS009 Glide n° FF-2014-000059-SRB Date of issue: 21 May 2014 Date of disaster: 13 May 2014 Operation manager (responsible for this EPoA): Point of contact: Djula Losonc; Disaster Management Coordinator, Vesna Milenovic, Secretary General Red Cross of Serbia Red Cross of Serbia Tel +381 11 30 32 125; Email [email protected] Alberto Monguzzi IFRC Europe Zone Disaster Management Coordinator Tel +36 1 8884 505; Email [email protected] Operation start date: 13 May 2014 Expected timeframe: 4 months Overall operation budget: CHF 290,926 Number of people to be assisted: Number of people affected: 120,000 households 7,120 people evacuated and sheltered Host National Society : Red Cross of Serbia Red Cross / Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: IFRC, ICRC Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: Emergency Management Department of the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Serbia, Municipalities, emergency headquarters of the endangered municipalities A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster Torrential rainfall has affected Serbia since 13 May 2014, with the amount of rain reaching two months` average in just two days. The floods in Serbia have taken at least 21 lives and more than 30,873 people have been evacuated by the Emergency Sector, Police and the Military Forces to date. A state of emergency has been declared for the whole country. All schools in Belgrade stopped work for two days while 155 primary and secondary schools are still closed in the affected areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Pursuant to Article 25, Paragraph 1 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities
    ACFC/SR (2002) 003 REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 16 October 2002) FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA FEDERAL MINISTRY OF NATIONAL AND ETHNIC COMMUNITIES THE FIRST REPORT BY THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Submitted pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 1, of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Belgrade 2002 2 THE FIRST REPORT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA Submitted pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 1, of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities TABLE OF CONTENTS: PART I: INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................6 PART II: GENERAL INFORMATION............................................................................................….8 1. Basic historical facts.................................................................................…….8 2. Basic demographic facts....................................................................................9 3. Basic economic indices....................................................................................13 4. Status of International Law..............................................................................14 5. Basic problems.............................................................................................…15
    [Show full text]
  • Health Impact of Ambient Air Pollution in Serbia a CALL to ACTION
    Health impact of ambient air pollution in Serbia A CALL TO ACTION РЕПУБЛИКА СРБИJA Министарство заштите животне средине REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Ministry of Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia MINISTRY OF HEALTH Abstract This report, on a comprehensive investigation on the impact of air quality on health in Serbia, assesses the effects of air pollution on health in major cities. The results show that long-term exposure to air pollution leads to premature death for a relevant percentage of the population, and short-term exposure to air pollution increases mortality risk. The investigation collected data on air quality, the population and its health in 2010–2015. Levels of pollutants exceeding the values of the WHO air quality guidelines and the limits set by European Union legislation on air quality were recorded in several Serbian cities. The WHO AirQ+ software was used to calculate the proportion of deaths due to air pollution for the main Serbian cities. The analysis of the national data shows that nearly 3600 premature deaths every year are attributable to exposure to fine particulate matter measuring ≤ 2.5 µm (PM2.5) in 11 studied cities in Serbia. Simulations of progressive reductions in current PM2.5 concentrations point towards major health benefits from improving air quality in the country. The results of this analysis indicate the importance of a reliable monitoring of air quality and the need for interventions to reduce the burden of air pollution in Serbia. Keywords AIR POLLUTION EXPOSURE HEALTH IMPACTS URBAN HEALTH SERBIA Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe UN City, Marmorvej 51 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office website (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest).
    [Show full text]
  • (Ambrosia Artemisiifolia L.) Na Teritoriji Opštine Obrenovac
    UDK: 581.5.522.2 Naučni rad – Scientific paper Rasprostranjenost ambrozije (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) na teritoriji opštine Obrenovac Radmila Stanković-Kalezić, Vladan Jovanović, Vaskrsija Janjić, Ljiljana Radivojević, Ljiljana Šantrić, Jelena Gajić-Umiljendić Institut za pesticide i zaštitu životne sredine, Banatska 31b, 11080 Beograd, Srbija REZIME Na osnovu podataka dobijenih florističkim snimanjem ambrozija je na teritoriji opštine Obrenovac evidentirana na 1034 lokaliteta ukupne površine od oko 655 ha. Po veličini zako- rovljene površine ističu se mesne zajednice Grabovac (54,876 ha), Zvečka (53,195 ha), Trstenica (55,25 ha), Dren (55,233 ha) i Orašac (50,655 ha). Naročito alarmantno je to da skoro polovina lokaliteta, tačnije 470 lokaliteta (45,45%), predstavljaju žarišta rasprostranjenja, sa zastupljeno- šću ambrozije na preko 50% površine (ocena 4) na lokalitetu. Najčešću vrstu staništa za razvoj ambrozije nesumnjivo predstavljaju strništa, koja čine 81,16% zakorovljenih površina (531 ha) na teritoriji opštine Obrenovac. Relativno mala površina ruderalnih staništa koja je napadnu- ta ambrozijom može da izazove pogrešan utisak da sa te strane nema velike opasnosti. Slika se menja kada se pogleda broj zakorovljenih lokaliteta, najveći broj ih je na ruderalnom staništu (450). Pored puta su evidentirana 303 lokaliteta. To su lokaliteti male pojedinačne površine ali velike dužine i zato predstavljaju vrlo važan faktor za rasprostranjenje ambrozije. Koliko je stepen zakorovljenosti u opštini Obrenovac visok pokazuje i pojava da se ambrozi- ja sporadično, ali u dovoljnom broju, javlja i u livadskim sastojinama, što znači da, iako po pri- rodi pionirska biljka, pritom i još relativno nova na ovim prostorima, počinje uspešno da kom- petira sa autohtonim biljkama. Ključne reči: Obrenovac; ambrozija; rasprostranjenost UVOD Ambrozija (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) je jednogodišnja zeljasta biljka iz familije glavočika (Asteraceae).
    [Show full text]