DOCSLIB.ORG

Chevron Chemical Company Cedar Bayou Plant Draft Biological Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chevron Chemical Company Cedar Bayou Plant Draft Biological Assessment DRAFT FINAL Biological Assessment in Support of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Decision to Issue a Greenhouse Gas Permit in Connection with the Proposed Expansion of the Chevron Phillips Cedar Bayou Plant near the City of Baytown, Harris County, Texas Prepared for Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants November 2012 DRAFT FINAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S DECISION TO ISSUE A GREENHOUSE GAS PERMIT IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE CHEVRON PHILLIPS CEDAR BAYOU PLANT NEAR THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Prepared for Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP 10001 Six Pines Drive The Woodlands, Texas 77380 Attn: Cynthia Gleason (713) 280-0869 Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants Austin Office 4407 Monterey Oaks Boulevard, Building 1, Suite 110 Austin, Texas 78749 (512) 476-0891 www.swca.com SWCA Project No. 21457 November 6, 2012 DRAFT FINAL Biological Assessment for the Proposed Expansion of the Chevron Phillips Cedar Bayou Plant near the City of Baytown, Harris County, Texas CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. vii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 2. Agency Regulations ............................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Environmental Protection Agency Regulations and Standards ....................................................... 3 2.2. Endangered Species Act .................................................................................................................. 3 2.3. State of Texas Endangered Species Regulations ............................................................................. 3 3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 4 4. Project Description ................................................................................................................ 8 4.1. Project Purpose and Process ........................................................................................................... 8 4.2. Construction Information ............................................................................................................... 12 4.2.1. Construction Activities and Schedule .................................................................................... 12 4.2.2. Construction Equipment Required ......................................................................................... 12 4.2.3. Emissions Controls ................................................................................................................ 13 4.3. Operation and Maintenance Information ....................................................................................... 14 4.3.1. Operation ............................................................................................................................... 14 4.3.2. Water Use .............................................................................................................................. 14 4.3.3. Noise Levels .......................................................................................................................... 14 4.4. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Information..................................................... 15 4.5. Regional/Area Ecological Information .......................................................................................... 16 4.5.1. General Region Information .................................................................................................. 16 4.5.2. Land Use ................................................................................................................................ 16 4.5.3. Climate ................................................................................................................................... 17 4.5.4. Topography ............................................................................................................................ 17 4.5.5. Geology.................................................................................................................................. 17 4.5.6. Soils ....................................................................................................................................... 17 4.5.7. Water Resources .................................................................................................................... 18 4.5.8. Vegetation .............................................................................................................................. 22 4.5.9. Wildlife .................................................................................................................................. 22 4.6. Listed Species ................................................................................................................................ 23 4.6.1. Summary of Listed Species ................................................................................................... 23 4.6.2. Critical Habitat Designation .................................................................................................. 25 4.6.3. Descriptions of Listed Species ............................................................................................... 25 4.6.4. Descriptions of Recently Delisted Species with Monitoring Requirements .......................... 34 4.6.5. Texas Natural Diversity Database Results ............................................................................. 35 5. LIsted Species Habitat Evaluation ...................................................................................... 36 5.1. Vegetation Communities Observed ............................................................................................... 36 5.2. Listed Species Habitat Analysis ..................................................................................................... 36 6. Air Quality Analysis Results ............................................................................................... 38 6.1. Estimated Total Annual Emissions Overview ............................................................................... 38 6.2. Area of Impact Dispersion Modeling Results ................................................................................ 40 6.2.1. Dispersion Modeling Methods............................................................................................... 40 6.2.2. Dispersion Modeling Results ................................................................................................. 41 iii DRAFT FINAL Biological Assessment for the Proposed Expansion of the Chevron Phillips Cedar Bayou Plant near the City of Baytown, Harris County, Texas 7. Effects of the Federal Action .............................................................................................. 41 7.1. Air Quality ..................................................................................................................................... 41 7.1.1. Air Pollution Effects Background Review ............................................................................ 41 7.1.2. Air Quality Effects ................................................................................................................. 43 7.1.3. Impacts of Air Pollution Sources on Flora and Fauna ........................................................... 44 7.2. Water Quality ................................................................................................................................. 45 7.2.1. Wastewater Effects ................................................................................................................ 45 7.2.2. Surface Water Effects ............................................................................................................ 46 7.3. Noise .............................................................................................................................................. 46 7.3.1. Noise Effects Background Review ........................................................................................ 46 7.3.2. Noise-Related Effects ............................................................................................................ 47 7.4. Infrastructure-Related Effects ........................................................................................................ 47 7.5. Human Activity Effects ................................................................................................................. 47 8. Conclusions .......................................................................................................................... 48 8.1. Determination of Effect ................................................................................................................. 48 8.2. Cumulative Effects......................................................................................................................... 50 8.3. Interdependent and Interrelated Actions ........................................................................................ 50 9. Literature Cited ....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Bayou Bowl, with a Successful 16 Year History, Is an All-Star Football Game Featuring 36 of the Best from the Greater Housto
    The Bayou Bowl, with a successful 16 year history, is an All-Star Football Game featuring 36 of the best from the Greater Houston Area against 36 of the best from the State of Louisiana. After the 2013 contest, won by Texas, the Louisiana High School Athletic Association and the Greater Houston Football Coaches Association mutually agreed to end the series. As a result of this decision, the GHFCA Board of Directors, wanting to continue with an All-Star Football Game for the players in the Greater Houston Area, adopted the following format. We divided the city into an East-West alignment using I-45 as the dividing line. The U.I.L. High School districts were used to determine the direction of the member schools. The 2014 game was played in Sugarland, a West side venue, the 1st game played using the new format. It featured 72 players from the Greater Houston Area, 36 per squad, from 72 different member schools. The game was broadcast live on KTRK-TV, ABC, Channel 13, with Bob Slovak, sports director of KTRK-TV, handling the play by play. The 2015 game returned to the East side of Houston and Stallworth Stadium, Baytown. The 2016 game was played at Rhodes Stadium with the City of Katy serving as the 2016 Bayou Bowl Host. The 2017 game was played at Turner Stadium, Humble ISD, Humble, TX. The Kingwood Mustang marching band performed as well as the National Champion Dance Team, the Fillies. The 2018 game once again returned to Baytown’s Stallworth Stadium, the original site for the 1st Bayou Bowl Game played in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 – State of the Bay, Third Edition
    CHAPTER 7 – STATE OF THE BAY, THIRD EDITION Key Habitats of the Galveston Bay Watershed Written & Revised by L. James Lester The Gulf coastal plain rises gently from sea level to around 200 feet … Much of the flora is in tall grass and midgrass prairies and cordgrass marshes … The coastal marsh itself is a narrow belt of low wetlands. The fauna is very diverse, with more than three hundred species of birds relying on this area for food and rest on their spring and fall migrations ... Spanish records tell us that there were extensive open prairies of little bluestem, Indian grass, and sedges on the uplands between the many rivers. The bottomland hardwoods were abundant, with sugarberry, pecans, elm, and live oak. Now, most of the land has been plowed and cut into farms and ranches. —Richard Bartlett, in Saving the Best of Texas (1995) Introduction The Galveston Bay system contains a variety of habitat types, ranging from open water areas to wetlands to upland prairie. Regional habitats support numerous plant, fish, and wildlife species and contribute to the tremendous biodiversity found in the watershed. The maintenance of varied, abundant, and appropriate habitat is a requirement for the preservation of the characteristic biodiversity of the Galveston Bay system. Habitat is defined as the ecological or environmental area where organisms live. This chapter provides details on the most State of the Bay 2009 Bay the of State vulnerable habitats found – in and around Galveston Bay; including their location, relative area, CHAPTER 1 biological characteristics, State of the Bay – the ecological services 7 they provide and specific Figure 7.1.
    [Show full text]
  • 41 Years of Covering South Belt
    4141 yearsyears ofof coveringcovering SSouthouth BBeltelt Voice of Community-Minded People since 1976 Thursday, February 2, 2017 Email: [email protected] www.southbeltleader.com Vol. 42, No. 1 JFD dual credit meeting set A parent meeting for Dobie students inter- ested in participating in dual credit through Dobie Hall of Honor inductees announced San Jacinto College will be on Tuesday, Feb. By Reesha Brown Rounding out the inductee list is this year’s and community volunteers who have been se- Center, where she served as chief of pediatrics. 7, at 6 p.m. in the school cafeteria. Students Pasadena ISD Communications lone faculty inductee: former tennis coach Bob- lected for the Hall of Honor to 40. The Dobie Carter, a 17-year Coast Guard veteran, is cur- who are currently in 10th or 11th grade are Four Dobie High School alumni with four by Kramer, the architect of the Longhorns’ surge Hall of Honor program was launched in 2013. rently the skipper of the 270-foot cutter U.S. eligible to participate in the enrollment pro- diverse career backgrounds are among fi ve indi- to regional tennis prominence in both boys’ and Inductees are selected each fall by a commit- Coast Guard Cutter Legare, based out of Ports- cess. Representatives from San Jacinto viduals who will make history next month when girls’ competition three decades ago. tee of faculty and staff members at the school. mouth, Va. A decade ago, he captained a U.S. College will be present. For more informa- they are inducted into the Longhorns’ Hall of An induction ceremony to honor the new in- Taylor-Cox, a longtime Houston pediatri- Coast Guard cutter during a 14-month deploy- tion, contact Jennifer Johnson, coordinator for Honor.
    [Show full text]
  • Football Preview
    Sunday, August 25, 2019 The Baytown Sun Football 2019 Preview ƑƏƐƖ҃ƑƏƑƏ" $ ! !$ ĺ " " ! !" !"""ĺ"$ !" DATE DAY OPPONENT LOCATION STADIUM TIME DATE DAY OPPONENT LOCATION STADIUM TIME DATE DAY OPPONENT LOCATION STADIUM TIME 8/16 FRI SCRIMMAGE HOME STALLWORTH 08/16 FRI HJ/SCRIMMAGE HOME GCM 08/23 FRI BH/SCRIMMAGE AWAY BH STADIUM 8/23 FRI SCRIMMAGE HOME STALLWORTH DAYTON/ 08/22 FRI HOME GCM SCRIMMAGE 08/30 FRI CLEAR CREEK HOME STALLWORTH 7:00 08/30 FRI WESTBURY AWAY BUTLER 7:00 08/29 THUR SAM RAYBURN HOME STALLWORTH 7:00 09/06 FRI ALDINE NIMITZ AWAYW.W. THORNE 7:00 09/05 THUR SPLENDORA HOME STALLWORTH 7:00 09/06 FRI SOUTH HOUSTON HOME STALLWORTH 7:00 09/13 FRI HISD AUSTIN AWAYBARNETT 7:00 GALENA 09/12 THUR HOME STALLWORTH 7:00 09/13 FRI CLEAR FALLS HOME STALLWORTH 7:00 PARK 09/20 FRI BYE 09/20 FRI BYE BEAUMONT 09/20 FRI BYE 09/26 THUR HOME STALLWORTH 7:00 09/27 FRI HISD AUSTIN HOME STALLWORTH 7:00 UNITED 09/27 FRI PNG AWAY PNG 7:30 PA MADDRY 10/04 FRI PA MEMORIAL AWAY 7:00 10/04 FRI CHANNELVIEW AWAY 7:00 10/04 FRI SANTA FE HOME STALLWORTH 7:30 MEMORIAL STADIUM BARBERS 10/11 FRI PORTER AWAY TEXAN DRIVE 7:00 10/11 FRI LA PORTE HOME STALLWORTH 7:00 10/11 FRI AWAYBARBERS HILL 7:30 HILL 10/17 THUR HISD WISDOM HOME STALLWORTH 7:00 GALENA PARK 10/18 FRI NORTH SHORE AWAY 7:00 ISD STADIUM 10/18 FRI NEDERLAND HOME STALLWORTH 7:30 GALENA PARK 10/25 FRI GALENA PARK AWAY 7:00 ISD STADIUM 10/25 FRI DEER PARK HOME STALLWORTH 7:00 10/25 FRI DAYTON AWAYDAYTON 7:30 11/01 FRI NEW CANEY HOME STALLWORTH 7:00 10/31 THUR C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Patterns and Perceptions of Water Use In
    CHANGING PATTERNS AND PERCEPTIONS OF WATER USE IN EAST CENTRAL TEXAS SINCE THE TIME OF ANGLO SETTLEMENT A Dissertation by WENDY WINBORN PATZEWITSCH Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2007 Major Subject: Geography CHANGING PATTERNS AND PERCEPTIONS OF WATER USE IN EAST CENTRAL TEXAS SINCE THE TIME OF ANGLO SETTLEMENT A Dissertation by WENDY WINBORN PATZEWITSCH Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Jonathan M. Smith Committee Members, Peter J. Hugill Christian Brannstrom Bradford P. Wilcox Head of Department, Douglas J. Sherman May 2007 Major Subject: Geography iii ABSTRACT Changing Patterns and Perceptions of Water Use in East Central Texas Since the Time of Anglo Settlement. (May 2007) Wendy Winborn Patzewitsch, B.A., Trinity University; M.S., Southern Methodist University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Jonathan M. Smith Patterns and perceptions of water use have changed since Anglo settlement in Texas in the early nineteenth century. Change has not been constant, gradual, or linear, but rather has occurred in fits and spurts. This pattern of punctuated equilibrium in water use regimes is the central finding of this dissertation. Water use is examined in terms of built, organizational, and institutional inertias that resist change in the cultural landscape. Change occurs only when forced by crisis and results in water management at an increasing scale. Perception is critical in forcing response to crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity River Basin
    Below is an Electronic Version of an Out-of-Print Publication You can scroll to view or print this publication here, or you can borrow a paper copy from the Texas State Library, 512/463-5455. You can also view a copy at the TCEQ Library, 512/239-0020, or borrow one through your branch library using interlibrary loan. The TCEQ’s current print publications are listed in our catalog at www.tnrcc.state.tx.us/admin/topdoc/index.html. Basin 08 Trinity River 285 Trinity River Basin Narrative Summary Four forks of the Trinity River drain a large portion of north central Texas before merging into a single stream that flows south-southeastward and discharges into Trinity Bay on the Texas coast. The longest fork, the West Fork, originates in southeastern Archer County and flows across Jack, Wise, and Tarrant counties before joining the main stem in Dallas County. The Clear Fork originates in Parker County and flows southeastward, merging with the West Fork in Tarrant County. The Elm Fork originates near the Montague County line and flows across Cooke and Denton counties, converging with the West Fork in Dallas County. The river is called the Trinity downstream of the West Fork/Elm Fork confluence. The East Fork originates in Cooke County and flows southward through Collin and Kaufman counties, joining the main stem at the Kaufman/Ellis county line. The total drainage area of the system is 17,969 square miles and includes parts of 34 counties. The Trinity River Basin has the largest population of any river basin in Texas, the Dallas/Fort Worth metropolitan area alone containing more than three million people.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 State of the Double Bayou Watershed
    2 State of the Double Bayou Watershed 2.1 Double Bayou Watershed Overview 2.1.1 Double Bayou landscape The Double Bayou watershed is located on the Upper Texas Gulf Coast and is part of the Galveston Bay watershed (Figure 2-1 Double Bayou watershed). Situated in the eastern portion of the Lower Galveston Bay, it is comprised of two main subwatersheds: East Fork and West Fork, which are also the primary waterways in the watershed. The Double Bayou watershed drains directly into the Trinity Bay system and ultimately into Galveston Bay. The majority (93%) of the watershed lies within Chambers County, Texas. The remaining 7% of the watershed is located in Liberty County, Texas. The Double Bayou watershed drains 98 square miles (61,445 acres) of predominantly rural and agricultural landscape. However, several residential centers are located in the watershed. Figure 2-1 Double Bayou watershed 1 The City of Anahuac, Texas is located on the Trinity River and the northeast bank of Trinity Bay. This rural community is the largest contiguous area of developed land in the watershed. Anahuac has a total area of 1,344 acres (2.1 square miles) and is nine feet above sea level (District 2013). Anahuac is the Chambers County seat, with a 2010 population of 2,243. Much of the middle portion of Chambers county drains into Double Bayou. The unincorporated community of Oak Island is identified by the U.S. Census as a designated place. Oak Island is located at the confluence of the East and West Forks of Double Bayou and Trinity Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 – State of the Bay, Third Edition
    CHAPTER 3 – STATE OF THE BAY, THIRD EDITION The Human Role: Past Written by Alecya Gallaway At sundown we reached Redfish Bar, composed almost entirely of shells which extend from bank to bank the distance of several miles and appear to be formed by the confluence of the tide and the waters of the San Jacinto and Trinity, which unite a short distance above … This point is undoubtedly the head of navigation for vessels of heavy burden and has occurred to some as a more suitable site for a city than Galveston itself. —Texas in 1837, edited by Andrew Forest Muir (1958) Introduction This chapter examines the history of resource use in Galveston Bay and its adjacent land area. The chapter begins with a look back to the Pleistocene Ice Age and the impact of the earliest humans, continues with the use of resources by Native Americans and changes engendered by the transition to European-American settlement, and then focuses on the alterations that occurred to the bay as the regional focus shifted from agriculture to municipal and industrial development. This chapter describes resource use and human impact from pre-history to 1950. More recent developments and impacts are covered in Chapter 4. Resource Use: Prehistory to 1800 Galveston Bay is a recent feature of the Earth by geological reckoning. Thousands of years before the bay formed, water was held in continental ice sheets causing the sea level to be considerably lower than it is today. The shoreline was located 50–100 miles farther south into the area now covered by the Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Thursday, July 18, 2019 Email: [email protected] Vol
    4343 yearsyears ofof coveringcovering SouthSouth BeltBelt Voice of Community-Minded People since 1976 Thursday, July 18, 2019 Email: [email protected] www.southbeltleader.com Vol. 44, No. 25 Leader seeks vacation pics The Leader is seeking readers’ 2019 vaca- tion photos. First-, second- and third-place priz- County adopts new flood regulations es of Schlitterbahn tickets will be awarded for the best submissions July and August. Submis- New regulations passed by Harris County Decades of development fueled the Houston Multiple “500-year” fl oods over the past few lies and could not be delayed. sions should include where and when the pho- Commissioners Court on Tuesday will add an ad- area’s rapid growth but also exacerbated fl ooding years and more recent storms have made it clear “While I understand the concerns from some in to was taken, details about the trip and first and ditional layer of protection for families and com- as concrete increasingly replaced prairies and for- that Harris County’s current fl oodplain maps are the development community that these necessary last names of each person in the photo. All pho- munities at risk of severe fl ooding. ests. By requiring new developments to increase insuffi cient or inaccurate, especially given the updates may increase their costs, my priority is en- tos must be high resolution. Email photos to my Commissioners Court adopted new regulations detention for holding back storm water and antic- growing threat of climate change to the region. suring that we as a county government do every- [email protected]. See this week’s va- for the Harris County Engineer’s offi ce that will ipating new fl oodplain maps, these new items ad- The new guidelines adopted by the Harris Coun- thing we can to protect our constituents – wheth- cation photos on Page 6A.
    [Show full text]
  • Chambers County Greenprint for Growth and Conservation
    Published by The Trust for Public Land The Trust for Public Land conserves land for people to enjoy as parks, gardens, and other natural places, ensuring livable communities for generations to come. Chambers County Greenprint for Growth and Conservation Cover photo (left) by Amy Turner Cover photo (right) by Waterborne Education Center Chambers County Greenprint for Growth and Conservation A report by The trust for Public Land June 2009 The Trust for Public Land gratefully acknowledges the following supporters for their generous contributions toward this project: The Coastal Coordination Council pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA06NOS4190219 Chambers County Greenprint Coordinating Committee Greenprint Technical Advisory Committee Greenprint Strategy Exchange Team Exchange Week contributors to meals, lodging, and tours: Anahuac Area Chamber of Spoonbill RV Park and Lodge Commerce Turtle Bayou Landing Anahuac National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bayer Wallisville Project Chambers County Waterborne Education Center NRG Energy West Chambers County Chamber Oak Island Lodge of Commerce Rice Festival and Gator Fest Winnie Chamber of Commerce Speer Properties Additional thanks to the Chambers County community and all of the partners from local government, agencies, organizations, and citizens who participated in public stakeholder meetings and the Strategy Exchange Week. ©2009 The Trust for Public Land. All rights reserved. Greenprint for Growth is a registered trademark of The Trust for Public
    [Show full text]
  • American Eel Biological Species Report
    AMERICAN EEL BIOLOGICAL SPECIES REPORT U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 5 June 2015 This page blank for two-sided printing ii U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Northeast Region AMERICAN EEL BIOLOGICAL SPECIES REPORT Steven L. Shepard U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Maine Field Office 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 2 Orono, Maine 04473-3702 [email protected] For copies of this report, contact: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Hadley, MA 01035 http://www.fws.gov/northeast/newsroom/eels.html http://www.regulations.gov This American Eel Biological Species Report has been prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) in support of a Status Review pursuant to the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531, et seq. This report reviews the best available information, including published literature, reports, unpublished data, and expert opinions. The report addresses current American eel issues in contemporary time frames. The report is not intended to provide definitive statements on the subjects addressed, but rather as a review of the best available information and ongoing investigations. The report includes updates to, and relevant material from, the Service’s 2007 American Eel Status Review. The report was published in January 2015 following peer review. The report was revised to correct typographical and minor factual errors and reissued in June 2015. With thanks to Krishna Gifford, Martin Miller, James McCleave, Alex Haro, Tom Kwak, David Richardson, Andy Dolloff, Kate Taylor, Wilson Laney, Sheila Eyler, Mark Cantrell, Rosemarie Gnam, Caitlin Snyder, AJ Vale, Steve Minkkinen, Matt Schwarz, Sarah LaPorte, Angela Erves, Heather Bell, the ASMFC American Eel Technical Committee, and the USFWS American Eel Working Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Approves Over $500K for Pavement Reimbursment for New Housing Subdivision SEE PAGE 10 a by Sue Hawthorne Paving Costs
    Anahuac National Bank 801 South Ross Sterling (409) 267-3106 • www.anbank.net A Family of Community Banks East Chambers County Bank Winnie, TX 77665 (409) 296-2265 • www.eastccbank.net Serving Southeast Texas Barbers Hill Bank Eagle Drive & (Inside HEB) Independently Owned and Operated with Locations Mont Belvieu, TX 77580 across Chambers and Liberty County! (281) 385-6455 • www.bhbank.net Hardin Bank Hardin, TX 77561 (936) 298-2265 • www.hardinbank.net The Progress Serving Chambers County Since 1908 Wednesday • February 26, 2020 • www.theanahuacprogress.com • Volume 111 - No. 31 • 75¢ VOTE Court approves over $500k for pavement reimbursment for new housing subdivision SEE PAGE 10 A By Sue Hawthorne paving costs. The reimbursement will begin receive $3 million in ad valorem taxes from Contributing Writer when 76 homes are completed and are on that subdivision’s homeowners. Anahuac the tax roll. ISD is expected to receive $7.9 million, INSIDE Chambers County Commissioners Court The reimbursement is for the first section with $2.3 million expected for Trinity Bay approved an Economic Development – once the next section begins, they may Conservation District. Around Town 2A Agreement February 11 with Dutton Lake present another Economic Development “The development will be very beneficial Obituary notices 4A LLC regarding the new Cypress Point sub- Agreement to the court. to all of the taxing entities in that area,” Local News 5A division near White’s Park. West Chambers County Economic added Precinct 4 Commissioner Billy Business Directrory 9A Under the terms of the agreement, the Development Director B. J. Simon told the Combs.
    [Show full text]