009, As Amended by Resolution No

Republic of the Philippines ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSIO San Miguel Avenue, Pasig City

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR CONFIRMATION AND APPROVAL OF CALCULATIONS OF OVER OR UNDER-RECOVERIES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AUTOMATIC COST ADJUSTMENT AND TRUE- UP MECHANISMS AND CORRESPONDING CONFIRMATION PROCESS PURSUANT TO ERC RESOLUTION NO. 16, SERIES OF 2009, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NO. 21, SERIES OF 2010

ERC CASE NO. 2015-027 CF

NEGROS ORIENTAL I ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, DOCKETED INC. (NORECO I), ]j)ll.te:~;.l:..L.?.l!!.!. " Applicant. 11~'~,.... ._.~ ....- il J(------J(

DECISION

Before this Commission is the application filed by the Negros Oriental I Electric Cooperative, Inc. (NORECO I) on 31 March 2015 for confirmation and approval of calculations of over or under- recoveries in the implementation of automatic cost adjustment and true-up mechanisms and corresponding confirmation process pursuant to ERC Resolution NOr' 6, . ries of 2009, as amended by Resolution No. 21, Series of2010

. . ERC Case No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page 2 Of20

FACTS

In the said application, NORECO I alleged, among others, the following:

1. NORECO I is an electric cooperative duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the Republic of the Philippines, with principal office at Tinaogan, Bindoy, Negros Oriental;

2. NORECO I holds an exclusive franchise to operate an electric light and power distribution service in the municipalities of Negros Oriental, namely: Mabinay, Manjuyod, Bindoy, Ayungon, Tayasan, Jimalalud, La Libertad, Vallehermoso and the cities of Guihulngan, Bais and Canla-on, all in the province ofNegros Oriental;

3. The Commission's Resolution No. 16, Series of 2009, as amended by Resolution No. 21, Series of 2010, established the procedure for the automatic recovery or refund of pass through costs and the confirmation process that would govern the automatic cost adjustment and true-up mechanisms approved by the Commission, with the objective of ensuring appropriate recovery of the pass through costs in an efficient manner and to put in place a fair and transparent process for the confirmation of the automatic cost adjustments implemented by Distribution Utilities and the true-up of other pass through charges involving Generation Rate, Transmission Rate, System Loss Rate, Lifeline Rate Recovery and Senior Citizen Discount;

4. NORECO I applied the formulae provided under Resolution No. 16, Series of 2009, as amended by Resolution No. 21, Series of 2010, in determining the over recoveries and under recoveries incurred in its implementation of the foregoing automatic cost adjustments and true-up mechanisms;

5. The results of NORECO I's calculations per cost item which sums up to a net over recovery:~/5,959,788.59) are presented hereunder, as fOllOWS? ERCCase No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page 3 Of20

ITEMS Amount in Pesos Generation (2,226,722.16) Transmission 764,070.52 System Loss (4,885,206.18) Lifeline Rate 407,419.85 Senior Citizen (19,35°.62) Net Over-Under Recoveries (5,959,788.59)

Summaries of the results of individual yearly computations on the foregoing pass through charges are attached to the application and made integral parts hereof as Annexes "A" to "C", respectively;

6. In support of the computations made, NORECO I submitted the following data and documents, labeled together and made an integral part of the application as Annex "D":

a. Power Supplier Data Sheet; b. Statistical Data Sheet; c. Implemented Rates Data Sheet; d. Power Bills of Power Suppliers; e. Official Receipts (O.K) issued by Power Suppliers; f. Breakdown of Payments with O.K; g. Debit/Credit Memo of Power Suppliers; h. O.R. issued by the National Transmission Corporation (TRANSCO)/N ational Grid Corporation of the Philippines (NGCP); 1. Breakdown of Payments with O.K; j. Debit/Credit Memo issued by TRANSCO/NGCP; k. DU-M01 and DU-M02, MFSR; 1. Consumer Bills of Lifeliners (per level) and Non-Lifeliners per customer class; and

7. NORECO I prayed that the calculations of over or under recoveries presented in the application be confirmed and approved and that the amount of Five Million Nine Hundred Fifty Nine Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty Eight Pesos and Fifty-Nine Centavos (PhP5,959,788.59) o~o/ recoveries be allowed to be refundedto;t, cu"ome~ ERC Case No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page40f2o

Subsequently, having found NORECO 1's Application to be sufficient in form and substance, with the required fees having been paid, the Commission issued an Order and Notice of Public Hearing both dated 09 December 2015 setting the case for initial hearing on 27 January 2016.

In the same Order, NORECO I was directed to cause publication of the Notice of Public Hearing, at its own expense, once (IX) in a newspaper of general circulation in the Philippines, with the date of the publication to be made not later than ten (10) days before the date of the scheduled initial hearing. It was also directed to inform the consumers within its franchise area, by any other means available and appropriate, of the filing of the instant application, its reasons therefor, and of the scheduled hearing thereon.

NORECO I was, likewise, directed to furnish the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), the Commission on Audit (COA), the Committees on Energy of both Houses of Congress, the Office of the Provincial Governor of Negros oriental and the Mayors of the Cities/Municipalities within its franchise area, with copies of the Application, Order and Notice of Public Hearing.

On 21 January 2016, NORECO I filed its "Pre-trial Brief"

During the 27 January 2016 hearing, NORECO I appeared. There was no intervenor or oppositor who appeared nor was there any intervention or opposition registered.

In the said hearing, NORECO I was directed to present its proofs of compliance with the Commission's posting and publication of notice requirements pursuant to the Order dated 09 December 2015. NORECO I presented proofs of the said compliance, which were duly marked as Exhibits "G" to "J-4", inclusive. Thereafter, the Commission certified that NORECO I had fully complied with the jurisdictional requirements pursuant to the said Order.

Thereafter, the Expository Presentation commenced. NORECO I presented Engr. John Paul D. Taub, Technical Audit Staff of NORECO I, who delivered under oath the said presentation. Thereafter, the Commission terminated the Expository Presentation and proceeded with the Pre-trial and Evidentiary presentati~ ;/ ERC Case No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Pages Of20

During the evidentiary presentation, NORECO I presented Engr. John Paul D. Taub, as its lone witness, who testified in support of the instant Application. In the course thereof, various documents were identified and marked as exhibits.

After the direct examination, the Commission propounded c1arificatory questions on the said witness. Thereafter, NORECO I moved that an Order of General default be issued against those who failed to appear in the said hearing. Finding the said Motion meritorious, the Commission granted the same. Thereafter, the Commission directed NORECO I to submit its formal offer of evidence and the required additional documents.

On 27 January 2016, NORECO I filed its "Compliance (To the Order dated 09 December 2015)".

On 10 February 2016, NORECO I filed a "Motion for Additional Time (To Submit Compliance and Formal Offer of Exhibits), praying that an extension of fifteen (15) days from 11February 2016 or until 26 February 2016 within which to file its Compliance and Formal Offer of Evidence.

On 26 February 2016, NORECO I filed its "Compliance with Motion" and "Formal Offer of Evidence".

On 15 July 2016, the Commission issued an Order admitting NORECO I's marked exhibits contained in the "Formal Offer of Evidence" and submitting the case for resolution.

ISSUE

The issue to be resolved is whether the Commission should grant the instant Application and confirm and approve NORECO I's calculations of its (over)/under recovery for the period 2012 to 2014, pursuant to the Commission's Resolution~~. 1~eries of 2009, as amended by Resolution No. 21, Series of 20~ ERCCase No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page 6 of 20

DISCUSSION

In its Application, NORECO I sought the approval of the Commission of the following (over)/under recoveries:

ITEMS Amount in Pesos Generation (2,226,722.16) Transmission 764,070.52 System Loss (4,885,206.18) Lifeline Rate 407,419.85 Senior Citizen (19,350.62) Net Over-Under Recoveries (5,959,788.59)

Pursuant to Resolution No. 16, Series of 2009, entitled "A Resolution Adopting the Rules Governing the Automatic Cost Adjustment and True-Up Mechanisms and Corresponding Confirmation Process for Distribution Utilities", as amended by Resolution No. 21, Series of 2010, entitled "A Resolution Amending Section 4 of Article 4 and Section 1 of Article 5 of the Rules Governing the Automatic Cost Adjustment and True-Up Mechanisms and Corresponding Confirmation Process for Distribution Utilities", and Resolution No. 23, Series of 2010, entitled '~ Resolution Adopting the Rules Implementing the Discounts to Qualified Senior Citizen End-Users and Subsidy from the Subsidizing End-Users on Electricity Consumption under Sections 4 and 5 of Republic Act No. 9994", the formulae below were adopted in the computation of the following: 1) Generation Rate; 2) Transmission Rate; 3) System Loss; 4) Lifeline Subsidy; and 5) Senior Citizen Discount and Subsidy:

Generation Rate:

GOUR = [(AGe - GRR )+ rGOu~.] /' SM~,~ 17 ERCCase No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page70f2o

Where:

GaUR = Refers to over/under-recoveries in generation costs during the recovery period expressed in Peso/kWh

AGe = Total Allowable Generation Cost, computed as follows:

AGC = L[((GC, +GC" + ...GCJ-50%(PPD, + PPD" + ...PPDn)- PCRGOUR )SGOUR] Lm TPGGOUR

Transmission Rate:

For Customer classes with TR expressed in Peso/kWh:

TOUR = [(ATCN -TRRN)+rTOURN] N

STOURN

Customer classes with TR expressed in Peso/kW and Customer classes with TR expressed in both Peso/kWh and Peso/kW:

Where:

TaURN = Refers to over/under-recoveries in transmission cost during the recovery period expressed in Peso/kWh for class N

= Refers to the actual transmission cost during the ~very period computed as fOllOWS:'i ERCCase No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page 8 of20

ATC = ,,[(TC - SO%PFDJS f'P, N L. TPG TOUR N L.m TOUR

System Loss:

SLOUR = [(ASLC - ASLR) + rSLOURJ

SSLOUR

Where:

SLOUR = Refers to over/under-recoveries in system loss during the recovery period expressed in Peso/kWh

ASLC = Allowable System Loss Cost incurred during the recovery period determined as follows:

ASLC = ASLCY] + ASLCY2 + ... ASLCYn

Where:

ASLC =([GTGCr + TCy -SO%PFDrJUJS YL .. n TPG TPG Y Y Y

Lifeline Subsidy:

LSOUR= LD

. SLSOURNL_'~ ERCCase No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page 9 Of20

Where:

LSOUR = Refers to over/under-recoveries on lifeline subsidy during the recovery period expressed in Peso/kWh

LD = Difference between the Total Discounts given to lifeline customers and Total Subsidy collected from non-lifeline customers, computed as follows:

LD= I(TS-TD) L.rn

Where:

TS = Lifeline subsidy amount collected from non-lifeline customers for month 1to m, computed as follows:

TS = SLSOUR x LSR Nl"

Where:

SLSOURNL = total kWh consumption of non-lifeline customers for the month

LSR = lifeline subsidy rate per kWh collected from non-lifeline customers for the month

TD = total discount amount given to lifeline customers for month 1 to m, computed as follows:

TD;= I[((SLSOUllJxTRate)+(NCushxFixedICust))xD] )=1.. .n ERCCase No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page 10 Of20

Senior Citizen Subsidy:

SrDSOUR = SrDiffs_D k~VI1SsrDSOURsEU

Where:

SrDSOUR = Refers to the over/under recoveries on senior citizen discounts and subsidy during the recovery period subject for verification expressed in PhP/kWh

SrDiffs_D = Summation of the difference between the total subsidy collected from all subsidizing end-users and the total discounts granted to senior citizen end-users for each and every recovery month within the period covered by the verification process, computed as follows:

SrDiffs_D - "\"'(TS TD) - L SEUr - Srr

i. ..-:1'1

Where:

= Total amount of subsidy collected from all subsidizing end-users for the recovery month, computed as follows:

= SrSRSEUr x kWhSSEUr

liVhere:

= Senior Citizen Subsidy Rate expressed in Peso/kWh implemented or collected from all subsidizing end-users for the recovery monili~ ERC Case No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page 11 of 20

kWhSsEU = Total kWh Sales to all subsidizing end- users for the recovery month

= Total amount of discounts implemented or granted to all qualified senior citizen end-users for the recovery month, computed as follows:

VVhere:

I,TDsrResll = Total amount of discount implemented or granted to all qualified residential senior citizens customer for the recovery month

I,TDsrIllstr = Total amount of discount implemented or granted to all qualified senior citizen centers and residential care facilities/institutions or group homes for the recovery month

After a thorough evaluation of the instant Application, the following considerations were adopted by the Commission in determining the resulting (over)/under recoveries of NORECO I:

Particulars NORECO I Basis ERCBasis

1. Generation Generation cost was based Same documents were on the InVOICeSsubmitted used in the evaluation from National Power Corporation (NPC), KEPCO - SPC Power Corporation, Green Core Geothermal Inc. Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM) and Negros Occidental Electric Cooperative, Inc. (NOCECO) from the period January 2012 to December 2014 ERC Case No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page 12 Of20

2. Transmission Transmission cost was based Same documents were on NGCP invoices used in the evaluation 3. Discounts: PFD Transmission cost was Same policy was determined net of the 50% applied during the PFD availed from NGCP. evaluation

PPD 50% of PPD availed from NPC Consistent with the from January 2012 to Commission's policy December 2014 was deducted of sharing the from the generation cost equivalent 50% of the - discounts availed by the DU to its end- users 4. kWh The kWh purchased from Same documents were Purchased National Power Corporation used in the evaluation and (NPC), KEPCO-SPC Power Generated Corporation, Green Core Geothermal, Inc. Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM) and Negros Occidental Electric Cooperative, Inc.(NOCECO) from the period January 2012 to December 2014 5. kWh Sales The kWh Sales of the previous kWh Sales of the month. current month 6. System Loss Actual system loss for the Actual annual system previous 12- months or the loss or the cap of 13%, cap whichever is lower based whichever IS lower, on the submitted MFSR based on the submitted MFSR 7. Lifeline Rate Computed monthly usmg Same kWh Sales of the preVIOUS month data and current month actual discounts gIVen to lifeline customers 8. Senior Citizen Computed monthly using the Same kWh Sales of the Subsidy previous month data current month ERC Case No. 2015-027 CF Decisionj26 July 2016 Page 13 Of20

A. Generation Cost

Generation cost was based on the invoices issued by the National Power Corporation (NPC), KEPCO - SPC Power Corporation, Green Core Geothermal Inc., Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM) and Negros Occidental Electric Cooperative, Inc. (NOCECO) from the period January 2012 to December 2014. In the evaluation thereof, the Commission utilized the same documents.

B. Transmission Cost

The transmission cost was computed using the invoices, official receipts, and other supplementary adjustments, if there is any, issued by the National Grid Corporation of the Philippines (NGCP) to NORECO I.

C. kWh Purchased

The total kWh Purchased was based on the invoices issued by NORECO I's power supplier, namely: National Power Corporation (NPC), KEPCO - SPC Power Corporation, Green Core Geothermal Inc., Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM) and Negros Occidental Electric Cooperative, Inc. (NOCECO) from the period January 2012 to December 2014.

D. kWh Sales

In determining the total kWh Sales, NORECO I used the kWh Sales of the previous months. On the other hand, the Commission used the actual kWh of the current month in the confirmation process.

E. System Loss

The computation for the annual system loss cost was based on the annual system loss cap of 13%, or actual value, whichever is 10~ y ERCCase No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page 14 of 20

F. Lifeline and Senior Citizen Subsidy

The Lifeline subsidy and Senior Citizen subsidy was computed using the current month's kWh sales data.

Moreover, the Commission noted the following observations, upon further evaluation of the instant Application:

1. For the CY 2012, NORECO I retained 50% of the total WESM gains except for the billing periods March 2012 and April 2012 billing months wherein it retained and enjoyed 100% WESM gains;

2. NORECO I's encoded Generation Rate (GR) in the simulation as submitted together with the application was found inconsistent with the implemented Generation Rate (GR) as reflected in submitted consumer bills which resulted to lower revenue;

3. In computing the transmission revenue for year 2012, NORECO I used only the rate of the Industrial Low Voltage in its simulation which is different from the actual implementation wherein the rates should vary based on the actual rate per customers class under the low voltage, thus, resulted to lower revenue; and

4. Under the lifeline, NORECO I incorrectly encoded the actual lifeline rate during the period billing period August 2012 of PhPo.8250/kWh instead of PhPo.0825.

In the instant Application, NORECO I sought the Commission's confirmation of its net (over)-recovery of PhP(5,959,788.59). However, after a careful scrutiny and evaluation of the records and submissions of NORECO I, it was established by the Commission that the purported net (over)-recovery was in fact lower as compared to the confirmed (over)-recovery amounting to PhP (36,018,712.65.), as ,hOWDhece;n belOW~ ERC Case No. 2015-027 CF Decisionj26 July 2016 Page 15 of 20

NORECOI's ERC's Confirmed Proposed (Over)j (Over)jUnder PARTICULARS Under Recoveries Recoveries PhP PhP 1. Generation (2,225,995.00 ) (32,926,269.75) 1. a. Generation - Sale For (727.16) 1,358.38 Resale 2. Transmission 764,070.52 (768,687.27) 3. System Loss (4,912,868.64) (5,564,337.32) 3. a. System Loss - Sale For 27,662-46 370,658.36 Resale 4. Lifeline Subsidy 407,419.85 2,879,277-49 5. Senior Citizen Subsidy (19,350.62) (10,712.54) Total Current (Over)jUnder (5,959,788.59) (36,018,712.65)

In view of the foregoing, NORECO I is reminded to be more circumspect in the preparation of its application submitted before the Commission. NORECO I is expected at all times to exude fair dealing which includes careful preparation of information embodied in its application or petition before this Commission.

Based on NORECO I's December 2015 annualized data on kWh sales, presented below is the matrix of cost adjustments with their corresponding (over)junder-recoveries to be (refunded)jrecovered from its customers for the period specified:

No. of Approved (Over)/Under Recoveries Particulars Mos. PhP PhP/kWh PhP/kW MAINLAND Generation Rate 48 (32,926,269.75) (0.1499) Transmission Rate (768,687.27) Residential (0.00'l6) 48 Low Voltage (0.00::1::1) Higher Voltage (0.6125) System Loss 48 (<;,<;64,::1::17.::12) (0.02C>'l) Lifeline Subsidy 48 2,879,277-49 0.0140 Senior Citizen Subsidy 12 (10,712.54) (0.0002) SALE FOR RESALE Generation 48 1,358.38 0.0016 System Loss 48 370,658.36 0-4422 TOTAL (36,018,712.65) ERC Case No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page 16 Of20

WHEREFORE, the foregoing premises considered, the Application filed by Negros Oriental I Electric Cooperative, Inc. (NORECO I) for confirmation and approval of over or under- recoveries in the implementation of automatic cost adjustment and true-up mechanisms and corresponding confirmation process pursuant to ERC Resolution No. 16, Series of 2009, as amended by Resolution No. 21, Series of 2010, is hereby APPROVED WITH MODIFICATION.

Accordingly, NORECO I is hereby directed to REFUND the following amounts starting on the next billing cycle from receipt hereof until such time that the full amount shall have been refunded:

A. GENERATION - MAIN (over)-recoveries amounting to PhP(32,926,269.7S) or equivalent rate of PhP(0.1499)/kWh for the period of 48 months, or until the said amount shall have been fully refunded to its customers;

B. TRANSMISSION (over)-recoveries amounting to PhP(768,687.27) or its equivalent refund rates per customer class for a period of 48 months, or until the said amount shall have been fully refunded to wit:

PhP kWh PhP kW (0.0036) (0.0033) (0.6125)

C. SYSTEM LOSS - MAIN (over)-recoveries amounting to PhP(S,S64,337.32) or an equivalent rate of PhP(0.02S3)fkWh for a period of 48 months, or until the said amount shall have been fully refunded to its customers; and

D. SENIOR CITIZEN SUBSIDY (over)-recoveries amounting to PhP(1O,712.S4) or an equivalent rate of PhP(0.0002)/kWh for a period of 12 months, or until the said amount shall have been fully refunded to its ,uoo;dizing cU'tome/{ ERC Case No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page 170f2o

On the other hand, NORECO I is hereby directed to COLLECT the following amounts starting on the next billing cycle from receipt hereof until such time that the full amount shall have been collected from its customers:

A. GENERATION - Sale for Resale under-recoveries amounting to PhPl,3S8.38 or equivalent rate of PhPO.0016/kWh for the period of 48 months, or until the said amount shall have been fully collected from its customers;

B. SYSTEM LOSS - SALE FOR RESALE under- recoveries amounting to PhP370,6S8.36 or equivalent rate of PhP0-4422/kWh lor a period of 48 months, or until the said amount shall have been fully collected from its customers; and

C. LIFELINE SUBSIDY under-recoveries amounting to PhP2,879,277-49 or an equivalent rate of PhPO.0140/kWh for a period of 48 months, or until the said amount shall have been fully collected from its non- lifeline customers.

In connection therewith, the NORECO I is hereby directed to comply with the following:

a) SUBMIT within ten (10) days from its implementation, a sworn statement indicating its compliance with the aforesaid directives;

b) REFLECT the (over)/under-recoveries in the monthly computations of GR, TR, SLR, LSR and SrSR as "OGA" for Generation, "OTCA" for Transmission, "OSLA" for System Loss, "OLRA" for Lifeline Subsidy and "OSrRA" for Senior Citizen Subsidy; and

c) ACCOMPLISH and SUBMIT a report in accordance with the attached prescribed format, on or before 30th day of the following month, together with the monthly reportorial requirement, and every month thereafter until the amount shall have been fully refunded/ cOllec~ ERC Case No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page 18 Of20

Finally, NORECO I is directed to strictly implement the Commission's Decision dated 07 July 2014 in ERC CASE No. 2012- 027 CF as well as the foregoing directives immediately upon receipt hereof.

SO ORDERED.

Pasig City, 26 July 2016.

~k GLO~~-cOe. YAP-TARDC Commissioner comm~~~r

(on leave] (on leave] JOSEFINA PATRICIAA. MAGPALE-ASIRIT GERONIMO D. STA. ANA Commissioner Commissioner

j M D/C G/NDC/~G/APV ~ecisiof,0l5-027 cf noreco i ERC Case No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page 19 Of20

Copy Furnished:

1. LAYUGLAWOFFICE Counsel for Applicant NORECO I Units 2904 One San Miguel Building San Miguel Avenue corner Shaw Boulevard Ortigas Center, Pasig City Tel No. (+632) 2341868

2. The General Manager NEGROS ORIENTAL I ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. (NORECOI) Tinaogan, Bindoy, Negros Oriental

3. The Office of the Solicitor General 134 Amorsolo Street, Legaspi Village Makati City, Metro Manila

4. The Commission on Audit Commonwealth Avenue Quezon City, Metro Manila

5. The Senate Committee on Energy GSIS Bldg., Roxas Blvd., Pasay City Metro Manila

6. The House Committee on Energy Batasan Hills, Quirino City, Metro Manila

7. Office of the City Mayor Canlaon City Province of Negros Oriental

8. Office of the City Mayor City of Guihulngan Province of Negros Oriental

9. Office of the City Mayor Bais City Province of Negros Oriental

10. Office of the Municipal Mayor Municipality of Jimalalud Province of Negros Orienta!

11. Office of the Municipal Mayor Municipality of Tayasan Province of Negros Oriental

12. Office of the Municipal Mayor Municipality of Ayungon,t~ 1 Province of Negros Orien~ I ERC Case No. 2015-027 CF Decision/26 July 2016 Page 20 Of20

13. Office of the Municipal Mayor Municipality of Bindoy Province of Negros Oriental

Office of the Municipal Mayor Municipality of Mabinay Province of Negros Oriental

15. Office of the Municipal Mayor Municipality of Manjuyod Province of Negros Oriental

16. Office of the Provincial Governor Province of Negros Oriental

17. Office of the Municipal Mayor Municipality of La Libertad Province of Negros Oriental

18. Office of the Municipal~yO Municipality ofVallehermoso Province of Negros Orienta Other Generation Rate Adjustment (OGA) Charge

Name of DU: This report should be submitted on or before the 30th ERC Case No.: of the following month, together with the monthly Order Date: reportorial requirement, and every month thereafter Total Amount to be Collected: until the amount shall have been fully recovered. Rate per kWh (PhP/kWh):

Other Generation Rate Adjustment (OGA) Charge Amount Collected/Refund For the Period Covering _

Month Rate/kWh kWh Sold' Amount Collected Balance in Amount

Beginning Balance 0.00

Customer Class 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. TOTAL Ending Balance 0.00

~I Indicate the kWh sold used in the calculation of colfect.

Prepared by: Reviewed by: Certified True and Correct:

(Name & Position) Finance/Billing Manager General Manager

OATH SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of ..201 at _ The affiant exhibited to me his/her eTC No. issued on at .

Notary Public Other Transmission Cost Adjustment (OTCA) Charge

Other Transmission Cost Adjustment (OTCA) Charge Amount Collected For the Period Covering _

Month Rate/kWh kWh Sold' Amount Collected Balance in Amount

Beginning Balance 0.00

Customer Class

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. TOTAL Ending Balance 0.00

~/ Indicate the kWh sold used in the calculation of collect.

Prepared by: Reviewed by: Certified True and Correct:

(Name & Position) Finance/Billing Manager General Manager

OATH SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of , 201 at . The affiant exhibited to me his/her eTC No. issued on at _

Notary Public Other System Loss Cost Adjustment (OS LA) Charge

Name of DU: This report should be submitted on or before the 30th ERC Case No.: of the following month, together with the monthly Order Date: Total Amount to be reportorial requirement, and every month thereafter Collected: untii the amount shall have been fully recovered. Rate per kWh (PhP/kWh):

Other System Loss Cost Adjustment (OSLA) Charge Amount Collected/Refund For the Period Covering _

Month Rate/kWh kWh Sold' Amount Collected Balance in Amount

Beginning Balance 0.00 Customer Class 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. TOTAL Ending Balance 0.00

~I Indicate the kWh sold used in the calculation of collect

Prepared by: Reviewed by: Certified True and Correct:

(Name & Position) Finance/Billing Manager General Manager

OATH SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of , 201 at _ The affiant exhibited 10 me his/her eTC No. issued on at _

Notary Public Other Lifeline Rate Cost Adjustment (OLRA) Charge

Name of DU: This report should be submitted on or before the 30th ERC Case No.: of the following month, together with the monthly Order Date: Total Amount to be reportorial requirement, and every month thereafter Collected: until the amount shall have been fully recovered. Rate per kWh (PhP/kWh):

Other Lifeline Rate Cost Adjustment (OLRA) Charge Amount Collected/Refund For the Period Covering _

Month Rate/kWh kWh Sold' Amount Collected Balance in Amount

Beginning Balance 0.00

Customer Class 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. TOTAL Ending Balance 0.00

~/ Indicate the kWh sold used in the calculation ofeal/eel.

Prepared by: Reviewed by: Certified True and Correct:

(Name & Position) Finance/Billing Manager General Manager

OATH SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of , 201 at _ The affiant exhibited to me his/her eTC No. issued on at _

Notary Public Senior Citizen Discount & Subsidy Over Under Recovery

Name of DU: This report should be submitted on or before the 30th ERC Case No.: of the following month, together with the monthly Order Date: Total Amount to be reportorial requirement, and every month thereafter Collected: until the amount shall have been fully recovered. Rate per kWh (PhP/kWh):

Senior Citizen Discount & Subsidy Over Under Recovery Amount Collected/Refund For the Period Covering _

Month Rate/kWh kWh Sold' Amount Collected Balance in Amount

Beginning Balance 0.00

Customer Class 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. TOTAL Ending Balance 0.00

~/ Indicate the kWh sold used in the calculation of collect

Prepared by: Reviewed by: Certified True and Correct:

(Name & Position) Finance/Billing Manager General Manager

OATH SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of 201 at _ The affiant exhibited to me his/her CTC No. issued on al _

Notary Public