US and Global Imbalances: Can Dark Matter Prevent a Big Bang?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

US and Global Imbalances: Can Dark Matter Prevent a Big Bang? DARK MATTER. Hausmann- Sturzenegger. U.S. AND GLOBAL IMBALANCES: CAN DARK MATTER PREVENT A BIG BANG? Ricardo Hausmann Kennedy School of Government and Center for International Development,, Harvard University Federico Sturzenegger Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University and Universidad Torcuato Di Tella November 13, 2005 Over the last couple of years the bludgeoning U.S. is now on the comfortable path to ruin”. of the US current account deficit, currently Maurice Obstfeld and Kenneth Rogoff (2005) ticking at over 700 billion dollars a year in 2005 remark that “any sober policymaker or alone, has led to significant concerns about the financial market analyst ought to regard the US future of the US and the possibility of a major current account deficit as a sword of Damocles global crisis. It comes after 27 years of hanging over the global economy”, or more unbroken deficits which have totaled over 5 dramatically, as stated by Nouriel Roubini and trillion dollars. Once the massive financing Brad Setser (2005) “The current account deficit required to keep on paying for such a widening will continue to grow on the back of higher gap dries up, perhaps because foreigners and higher payments on U.S. foreign debt even become satiated of owning such a large and if the trade deficit stabilizes. That is why rapidly growing amount of American debt, sustained trade deficits will set off the kind of there will be an ugly adjustment in the world explosive debt dynamics that lead to financial economy. The dollar will collapse, triggering a crises”. Figure 1 highlights the large and stampede away from American debt, interest growing yearly and cumulative current account rates will shoot up and a sharp global recession deficit of the US over the last 25 years which will ensue. Martin Wolf calls this situation an has made the US the largest net debtor in the “unsustainable black hole” and points that “The world. DARK MATTER. Hausmann- Sturzenegger. Figure 1. The US Current Account and it´s International Investment Position (in billions of US dollars) 1000 100 500 0 0 -100 -500 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 -200 -1000 -1500 -300 -2000 -400 -2500 -500 -3000 -600 -3500 -700 -4000 -4500 -800 BEA's IIP Cumulative CA US CA (right axis) Source: BEA But wait a minute. If this is such an open and that debt, the net return on its financial shut case, why has there been no crisis yet? position should have moved from a surplus of Why is the world willing to lend continuously 30 billion in 1982 to minus 210 billion dollars a to the US and to do so at such low interest year in 2004. Right? After all, debtors need to rates? Why do markets not react to the wisdom service their debt. that is being so generously given to them? One possibility it that the March of Folly is an So let’s look at how much is the actual return inevitable feature of human hubris and it is the on the US net financial position. The number role of the dismal scientist to act as a modern- for 2004 is, yes, you’ve guessed it, still a positive day Jeremiah. Or maybe, there is something 30 billion, just like in 1982! The US has spent seriously wrong about this worldview. 4.5 trillion dollars more than it has earned (which is what the cumulative current account Let’s look at some more facts. The Bureau of deficit implies) for free! Economic Analysis (BEA) indicates that in 1980 the US had about 365 billion dollars of How could this be? Here the official story net foreign assets (that is the difference becomes murky. Part of the answer is that the between the foreign assets owned abroad and US benefited from about 1.6 trillion dollars of the local assets owned by foreigners). These net capital gains so that instead of owing 4.1 assets rendered a net return of about 30 billion trillion, it owes “only” 2.5 trillion (which, at dollars. Between 1980 and 2004, the US best, cuts the puzzle in half, leaving a whole accumulated a current account deficit of 4.5 other half to be explained). The other part of trillion dollars. You would expect the net the official answer is that the US earns a higher foreign assets of the US to fall by that amount, return on its holdings of foreign assets than it to say, minus 4.1 trillion. If it paid 5 percent on pays to foreigners on its liabilities. DARK MATTER. Hausmann- Sturzenegger. 1000. All would deliver a similar story. In what Both explanations are clear as mud. Where did follows, we just take an arbitrary 5% rate, those large capital gains come from? Are they which implies a price-earnings ratio of 20. here today and gone tomorrow? Why are US investors abroad so much smarter than foreign So let’s get to work. We know that the US net investors in the US? After all, are global income on its financial portfolio is 30 billion portfolio investors not free to buy any assets dollars. This is a 5 percent return on an asset of they want? Why would foreigners consistently 600 billion dollars. So we would say that the pick worse assets than American investors? US is a net creditor to the tune of 600 billion Finally, isn’t there something misleading about dollars or about 5 percent of its GDP. Since calling a country that makes money on its the income flow has remained fairly stable over financial position the world’s largest debtor? the last 25 years, we would say that so have the US net foreign assets. Our view is that this is just a confusion caused by an unnatural set of accounting rules. All Now, in principle, countries cover their current accounting systems are consistent but arbitrary. account deficit by either running down their They all describe the same reality: measuring assets or accumulating liabilities. In either case, the temperature of the air in degrees centigrade they run down their net asset position. This is does not make the world colder than if what makes analysts worry about the US measured in Fahrenheit. But not all systems are current account deficit. In the standard equally transparent. If you choose to describe methodology the current account deficit is the orbit of the planets assuming that they equal to the change in the net foreign asset circle the Earth and not the Sun as Ptolemy position except for some unspecified did, you will have to include a bunch of adjustments (or Ptolemy’s epicycles), like the arbitrary epicycles to make the system fit the 1.6 trillion dollars in capital gains In our facts. approach, we will just define the current account deficit as the change in net foreign Thus, we propose a different way of describing assets, with no adjustments. Hence, we would the facts. We start by assuming that if an asset say that since the US net foreign assets have consistently pays more than another asset, then been stable, then the country has not been it is worth more, even if they both have the running a deficit. That is why it is still a net same historical cost or “book value”. We creditor. choose to value the assets on the basis of their returns. This is just like valuing a company by Figure 2 shows by how much the two measures calculating its earnings and multiplying by some differ. On the one hand it shows the price-earnings ratio, or valuing a property cumulative current account deficits according based on its rental value. For an individual to official statistics, which as was already company, the earnings of any given year may mentioned, add up to the 4.5 trillion that the give us an unreliable measure of its true earning US has overspent over the last twenty five potential, but if we average over an economy as years. The other line shows the cumulative large and diversified as the US and look at change in net foreign assets according to our trends over a couple of years, this simple methodology. The fact that the curve shows no methodology delivers reasonable results. Of meaningful trend (upwards or downward) is course, this opens the question as to what simply indicating that the total amount of net exactly this price earning ratio should be. We foreign assets held by US residents has virtually could use the rate the US pays on its liabilities, not changed. Put differently, that there have the US Treasury bill rate or just an arbitrary been no deficits over this period. fixed rate, or alternatively your age divided by DARK MATTER. Hausmann- Sturzenegger. Figure 2. Cumulative Current Accounts with official statistics and with Dark Matter 1000 0 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 -1000 -2000 -3000 -4000 -5000 Cum. CA w/official statistics Cum. CA w/Dark Matter Source: BEA and International Financial Statistics There is a large difference between our view of US accumulated a current account deficit equal the US as a net creditor with assets of about to 2.5 trillion dollars. We find that the net 600 billion US dollars and BEA’s view of the assets of the US went up by over 300 billion US as a net debtor with total net debt of 2.5 dollars.
Recommended publications
  • Is the International Role of the Dollar Changing?
    Is the International Role of the Dollar Changing? Linda S. Goldberg Recently the U.S. dollar’s preeminence as an international currency has been questioned. The emergence of the euro, changes www.newyorkfed.org/research/current_issues ✦ in the dollar’s value, and the fi nancial market crisis have, in the view of many commentators, posed a signifi cant challenge to the currency’s long-standing position in world markets. However, a study of the dollar across critical areas of international trade January 2010 ✦ and fi nance suggests that the dollar has retained its standing in key roles. While changes in the global status of the dollar are possible, factors such as inertia in currency use, the large size and relative stability of the U.S. economy, and the dollar pricing of oil and other commodities will help perpetuate the dollar’s role as the dominant medium for international transactions. Volume 16, Number 1 Volume y many measures, the U.S. dollar is the most important currency in the world. IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE It plays a central role in international trade and fi nance as both a store of value Band a medium of exchange. Many countries have adopted an exchange rate regime that anchors the value of their home currency to that of the dollar. Dollar holdings fi gure prominently in offi cial foreign exchange (FX) reserves—the foreign currency deposits and bonds maintained by monetary authorities and governments. And in international trade, the dollar is widely used for invoicing and settling import and export transactions around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • LATIN AMERICA ADVISOR a DAILY PUBLICATION of the DIALOGUE Thursday, December 10, 2015
    LATIN AMERICA ADVISOR A DAILY PUBLICATION OF THE DIALOGUE www.thedialogue.org Thursday, December 10, 2015 BOARD OF ADVISORS FEATURED Q&A TODAY’S NEWS Diego Arria Director, Columbus Group ECONOMIC Genaro Arriagada What Challenges Nonresident Senior Fellow, Moody’s Puts Inter-American Dialogue Brazil on Review Joyce Chang Global Head of Research, Face Argentina’s for Possible Junk JPMorgan Chase & Co. Status W. Bowman Cutter Former Partner, New President? If Moody’s strips Brazil of its E.M. Warburg Pincus investment-grade credit rating, it Dirk Donath would be the second of the three Senior Partner, major ratings agencies to do so. Catterton Aimara Such a move would likely cause Marlene Fernández Corporate Vice President for investors to drain money from the Government Relations, country. Arcos Dorados Page 2 Peter Hakim President Emeritus, Inter-American Dialogue BUSINESS Donna Hrinak President, Boeing Latin America Mexico Approves Jon Huenemann Sanofi ’s Dengue Vice President, U.S. & Int’l Affairs, Philip Morris International Vaccine Mauricio Macri is only the third non-Peronist candidate to have won Argentina’s presidency James R. Jones since military rule ended in 1983. // File Photo: Facebook page of Mauricio Macri. Mexico became the fi rst country Co-chair, Manatt Jones to approve a dengue vaccine for Global Strategies LLC Mauricio Macri, who takes offi ce today as Argentina’s pres- sale, however the approval does Craig A. Kelly not allow for the vaccine to be Director, Americas International ident, has signaled big policy shifts away from those of his Gov’t Relations, Exxon Mobil given to children under nine or predecessor, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner.
    [Show full text]
  • CID Working Paper No. 165 :: Estimating
    Estimating SARB’s Policy Reaction Rule Alberto Ortiz and Federico Sturzenegger CID Working Paper No. 165 May 2008 © Copyright 2008 Alberto Ortiz, Federico Sturzenegger and the President and Fellows of Harvard College Working Papers Center for International Development at Harvard University Estimating SARB’s Policy Reaction Rule* Alberto Ortiz and Federico Sturzenegger May 2008 Abstract: This paper uses a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model to estimate the South African Reserve Bank’s (SARB) policy reaction rule. We find that the SARB has a stable rule very much in line with those estimated for Canada, UK, Australia and New Zealand. Relative to other emerging economies the policy reaction function of the SARB appears to be much more stable with a consistent anti-inflation bias, a somewhat larger weight on output and a very low weight on the exchange rate. Keywords: monetary policy rules, exchange rates, structural estimation, Bayesian analysis JEL Codes: C32, E52, F41, O57 This paper is part of the CID South Africa Growth Initiative. This project is an initiative of the National Treasury of the Republic of South Africa within the government’s Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative (ASGI-SA), which seeks to consolidate the gains of post-transition economic stability and accelerate growth in order to create employment and improve the livelihoods of all South Africans. For more information and the entire series of papers, visit the project's web site at http://www.cid.harvard.edu/southafrica. * Originally published as: Alberto Ortiz and Federico Sturzenegger (2007), “Estimating SARB’s Policy Reaction Rule,” The South African Journal of Economics 75 (4), 659-680.
    [Show full text]
  • Credibility Dynamics and Inflation Expectations∗
    Credibility Dynamics and Inflation Expectations∗ Rumen Kostadinov† Francisco Roldán‡ April 2021 Abstract We study the optimal design of a disinflation plan by a planner who lacks commitment and has imperfect control over inflation. The government’s reputation for being committed to the plan evolves as the public compares realized inflation to the announced targets. Repu- tation is valuable as it helps curb inflation expectations. At the same time, plans that are more tempting to break lead to larger expected reputational losses in the ensuing equilib- rium. Taking these dynamics into consideration, the government announces a plan which balances promises of low inflation with dynamic incentives that make them credible. Wefind that, despite the absence of inflation inertia in the private economy, a gradual disinflation is preferred even in the zero-reputation limit. JEL Classification E52, C73 Keywords Imperfect credibility, reputation, optimal monetary policy, time inconsistency ∗The views expressed herein are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the IMF, its ExecutiveBoard, or its management. For insightful comments we thank Alberto Bisin, Marcos Chamon, Daniel Heymann, Boyan Jovanovic, Ricardo Lagos, Pablo Ottonello, David Pearce, Francisco Roch, Tom Sargent, Andrés Schneider, Ennio Stacchetti, Federico Sturzenegger, Martín Uribe, as well as seminar participants at NYU, UTDT, UdeSA, IIEP, andthe IMF. †Department of Economics, McMaster University; e-mail: [email protected] ‡Research Department, International Monetary Fund; e-mail: [email protected] 1 IntRoduction Macroeconomic models give expectations about future policy a large role in the determination of current outcomes. Policy is then generally set under one of two assumptions: commitment to future actions or discretion.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Cost of Foreign Exchange Reserves
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE SOCIAL COST OF FOREIGN EXCHANGE RESERVES Dani Rodrik Working Paper 11952 http://www.nber.org/papers/w11952 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 January 2006 The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. ©2006 by Dani Rodrik. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. The Social Cost of Foreign Exchange Reserves Dani Rodrik NBER Working Paper No. 11952 January 2006 JEL No. F3 ABSTRACT There has been a very rapid rise since the early 1990s in foreign reserves held by developing countries. These reserves have climbed to almost 30 percent of developing countries' GDP and 8 months of imports. Assuming reasonable spreads between the yield on reserve assets and the cost of foreign borrowing, the income loss to these countries amounts to close to 1 percent of GDP. Conditional on existing levels of short-term foreign borrowing, this does not represent too steep a price as an insurance premium against financial crises. But why developing countries have not tried harder to reduce short-term foreign liabilities in order to achieve the same level of liquidity (thereby paying a smaller cost in terms of reserve accumulation) remains an important puzzle. Dani Rodrik John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 and NBER [email protected] 1 THE SOCIAL COST OF FOREIGN EXCHANGE RESERVES Dani Rodrik Harvard University January 2006 I.
    [Show full text]
  • William W. Hogan
    March 2021 WILLIAM W. HOGAN PERSONAL DATA Born: 1944, Holyoke, Massachusetts Address: Harvard Kennedy School Harvard University 79 John F. Kennedy Street Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] http://www.whogan.com EDUCATION BS United States Air Force Academy, 1966 MBA University of California, Los Angeles, 1967 PhD University of California, Los Angeles, 1971 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2019 - Raymond Plank Research Professor of Global Energy Policy, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 2006 - 2019 Raymond Plank Professor of Global Energy Policy, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 2011- FTI Consulting, Boston, Massachusetts 1999 - 2011 Director, LECG, LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1998 - 2006 Lucius N. Littauer Professor of Public Policy and Administration, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1989 - 1999 Senior Advisor, Putnam, Hayes and Bartlett, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts 1987 - 1998 Thornton Bradshaw Professor of Public Policy and Management, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1982 - 1990 Chairman, Public Policy Program, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1980 - 1997 Director, Putnam, Hayes and Bartlett, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts 1978 - 1987 Professor of Political Economy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1978 - 1986 Director, Energy and Environmental Policy Center,
    [Show full text]
  • CID Working Paper No. 150 :: a Balance-Sheet Approach to Fiscal
    A Balance-Sheet Approach to Fiscal Sustainability Eduardo Levy-Yeyati and Federico Sturzenegger CID Working Paper No. 150 October 2007 © Copyright 2007 Eduardo Levy-Yeyati, Federico Sturzenegger, and the President and Fellows of Harvard College Working Papers Center for International Development at Harvard University A Balance-Sheet Approach to Fiscal Sustainability† Eduardo Levy-Yeyati and Federico Sturzenegger‡ Abstract Recent empirical research on emerging markets debt, currency crises and fiscal sustainability has placed a significant focus on the role of currency mismatches with the emphasis placed on the currency composition of explicit government liabilities. The key insight of this paper is that these liabilities, while relevant, usually represent a small share of actual government liabilities: indeed, as an indicator of fiscal solvency, they are relatively uninformative – and possibly misleading – if not matched with the remaining liabilities (promises of wage and pension payments among others) and the asset side of the government’s balance sheet: financial and real government assets as well as the present value of future tax collection. These non-debt liabilities and assets may be affected by changes in the real exchange rate in a way that dwarfs the effect on the explicit liabilities which are typically the focus of attention. With this in mind, this paper proposes a balance-sheet approach that, as illustrated by the practical applications included here, may radically alter the results from traditional sustainability evaluations – and, more generally, the perception of a country’s fiscal vulnerability. Keywords: assets, balance-sheet approach, currency, debt, emerging markets, fiscal sustainability, liabilities JEL codes: P43, H20, H60, H61 † This paper was also published in the KSG Faculty Research Working Papers Series as Working Paper #RWP07- 044.
    [Show full text]
  • The Argentine Crisis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics CCIIFF ESCUELA DE NEGOCIOS Centro de Investigación en Finanzas Universidad Torcuato Di Tella Centro de Investigación en Finanzas Documento de Trabajo 08/2002 Argentina’s Avoidable Crisis: Bad Luck, Bad Management, Bad Politics, Bad Advice Andrew Powell Universidad Torcuato Di Tella Miñones 2177, C1428ATG Buenos Aires • Tel: 4784.0080 interno 181 y 4787.9394 • Web site: www.utdt.edu/departamentos/empresarial/cif/cif.htm Preliminary Do not quote without author’s permission Argentina’s Avoidable Crisis: Bad Luck, Bad Economics, Bad Politics, Bad Advice Andrew Powell1 Paper Prepared for Brookings Trade Conference May 2nd 2002 Washington DC 1 Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires. I wish to thank Leandro Arozamena, Joyce Chang, Susan Collins, Hugh Elliott, Michael Gavin, Martín Gonzalez Rozada, Pablo Guidotti, José Luis Machinea, Pedro Pou and Féderico Sturzenegger and all the participants in the Brookings Trade Forum for their help in writing this paper and Augusto Stabalito for excellent Research Assistance. All mistakes remain my own. Contents 1. Introduction: A description of the events 2. Four Hypotheses 3. An Empirical Evaluation 4. On the Role of the IMF: lessons for institutions from Argentina 5. Conclusions Appendix 1: Results of a Vector Auto-regression Analysis Appendix 2: A Simple Game-theoretic approach to IMF/country strategic interactions 1. Introduction: a description of the events I recently renamed this paper, to counter the growing trend of papers that suggest that the Argentine crisis was inevitable. In what follows, I claim that while the currency may have been over-valued by conventional measures, especially after the devaluation of the Real, the current account had more or less adjusted by the end of 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Argentina's Road to Recovery
    Argentina’s Road to Recovery By Roger F. Noriega December 2015 KEY POINTS • Mauricio Macri, who will become Argentina’s president on December 10, is moving decisively to apply free-market solutions to restore his country’s prosperity, solvency, and global reputation. • Success of Macri’s center-right agenda could serve as an example for many Latin American countries whose statist policies have produced ailing economies and political instability. • As Argentina recovers its influence in favor of regional democracy and human rights, the United States must step forward to support these causes in the Americas. he November 22 election of Mauricio Macri, a incumbent, but many Peronists who rejected the Kirch- Tcenter-right former Buenos Aires mayor and busi- ners’ heavy-handed tactics ended up giving Macri the ness executive, as president of Argentina presents a votes he needed to win the presidency.3 pivotal opportunity to vindicate free-market economic Because the results were much closer than pre-election policies and rally democratic solidarity in the Americas. polls predicted, Macri does not have the momentum Although Argentina’s $700 billion economy is ailing, it that a landslide victory would have produced, and the remains the second largest in South America; if Macri’s Peronist opposition may bounce back quickly to block proposed reforms restore growth, jobs, and solvency, significant reforms. A successful two-term mayor, he could blaze the trail for other countries whose econ- Macri will have his political skills tested as he rallies omies have been stunted by socialist policies. And if the public, the powerful provincial governors, and he follows through on his pledge to invoke Mercosur’s moderate Peronists to rescue the country’s economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Macri's Macro: the Meandering Road to Stability
    BPEA Conference Drafts, September 5–6, 2019 Macri’s Macro: The Meandering Road to Stability and Growth Federico Sturzenegger, Universidad de San Andrés Conflict of Interest Disclosure: The author is Professor of Economics at Universidad de San Andrés and an advisor for Latus View, an investment firm. Beyond these affiliations, the author did not receive financial support from any firm or person for this paper or from any firm or person with a financial or political interest in this paper. He is currently not an officer, director, or board member of any organization with an interest in this paper. No outside party had the right to review this paper before circulation. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect those of Universidad de San Andrés or Latus View. Macri’s Macro The meandering road to stability and growth1 Federico Sturzenegger Universidad de San Andrés First Draft: July 2019 Conference Draft: August 2019 Abstract This paper reviews the various macroeconomic stabilization programs during the Macri government between 2015 and 2019. We ind that after an initial success each program was discontinued because of a distinct form of fiscal dominance : as pensions are indexed with a lag, and represent a large fraction of spending, quick disinlations jeopardize iscal consolidation. Lack of progress in the iscal front during the irst three years of the government made these reversals unavoidable. “...Whenever I visit a country they always say -you don´t understand Professor Dornbusch, here it is different-. ...Well, it never is” Prof. Dornbusch to his students, 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • CID Working Paper No. 124: Global Imbalances Or Bad Accounting?
    Global Imbalances or Bad Accounting? The Missing Dark Matter in the Wealth of Nations Ricardo Hausmann and Federico Sturzenegger CID Working Paper No. 124 January 2006 © Copyright 2006 Ricardo Hausmann, Federico Sturzenegger, and the President and Fellows of Harvard College Working Papers Center for International Development at Harvard University Global Imbalances or Bad Accounting? The Missing Dark Matter in the Wealth of Nations Ricardo Hausmann and Federico Sturzenegger Revised September 2006 Abstract This paper argues that current account statistics may provide a poor indication for the real evolution of a country’s net foreign assets. This may be due to a series of factors including the mismeasurement of FDI, unreported trade of insurance or liquidity services and debt relief. Because of these problems we suggest estimating net foreign assets by capitalizing the net investment income and then estimating the current account from the changes in this stock of foreign assets. We call dark matter the difference between our measure of net foreign assets and that portrayed by official statistics. We find dark matter to be important for many countries and that it relates to FDI flows, domestic volatility, and debt relief. We also find that, once dark matter is taken into account, global net asset positions appear to be relatively stable. In particular, the exports of dark matter of the US appear to be fairly steady and large enough to keep the US net asset position stable, casting doubts on the need for a major adjustment of the dollar or
    [Show full text]
  • The Argentina Crisis Introduction
    The National Bureau of Economic Research Program on Exchange Rate Crises in Emerging Markets Martin Feldstein and Jeffrey Frankel, Directors The Argentina Crisis July 17, 2002 Sebastian Edwards and Jeffrey Frankel, Organizers Report: Romi Bandura and Anne Le Brun Introduction The most recent of NBER’s country sessions on exchange rate crises in emerging markets was held in Cambridge, on July 17th, 2002. With Argentina still reeling from the impact of the devaluation and the default, and with its recovery path still undecided, the meeting took a certain sense of urgency. Many of the themes that dominated the discussion at previous country meetings reappeared in the case of Argentina—the roles of the fixed exchange rate, a weakened banking system, politically-driven policy decisions, and fiscal irresponsibility. But the Argentina crisis also sparked a new debate, on the viability of an exchange rate regime previously broadly lauded, the currency board. The meeting drew a large number of high-ranking former Argentine government officials, including the architect of the currency board, Domingo Cavallo, members of the current U.S. government, officials from international organizations, including the IMF’s First Deputy Managing Director, Anne Krueger, financial market participants and academics focused on the field international financial markets. The conference was divided into four sessions. The first three sessions aimed at understanding the causes of and the lessons to be learned from the crisis, from three different perspectives: 1) the banking sector, 2) the hard peg, and 3) debt. A final panel considered ‘desperation remedies’ that were adopted or discussed during 2000-2002, and attempted to look forward.
    [Show full text]