DOCSLIB.ORG

The Family Farm in the Post-World War Ii Era: Industrialization, the Cold War and Political Symbol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Family Farm in the Post-World War Ii Era: Industrialization, the Cold War and Political Symbol THE FAMILY FARM IN THE POST-WORLD WAR II ERA: INDUSTRIALIZATION, THE COLD WAR AND POLITICAL SYMBOL A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by RYAN STOCKWELL Dr. Catherine Rymph, Dissertation Supervisor AUGUST 2008 © Copyright by Ryan Stockwell 2008 All Rights Reserved The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled THE FAMILY FARM IN THE POST-WORLD WAR II ERA: INDUSTRIALIZATION, THE COLD WAR AND POLITICAL SYMBOL presented by Ryan Stockwell, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Catherine Rymph Professor Pamela Riney-Kehrberg Professor Carol Anderson Professor Robert M. Collins Professor Beth Barham ………………………….to Stephanie. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research and writing of a dissertation, for the most part a solitary endeavor, nonetheless is the result of dedication, guidance, and contributions of many whom deserve acknowledgement. The Harry S. Truman Presidential Library and the Dwight D. Eisenhower Library both provided generous research grants to explore their collections. The Department of History at the University of Missouri provided a fellowship, freeing me from teaching duties and allowing me to focus on writing. All of these funds are greatly appreciated. I would like to thank all of the members of my dissertation committee for taking the time to read and engage this work, pushing me in my argument, dissertation structure and writing. Dr. Carol Anderson, on top of being an excellent friend and mentor, showed me how to draw connections between seemingly distant foreign policy actions and domestic issues. Dr. Robert Collins and Dr. Beth Barham provided helpful commentary on the final draft. Dr. Pamela Riney-Kehrberg not only graciously joined the committee to alleviate an emergency situation, but pushed me to more completely develop my argument. Finally, to Dr. Catherine Rymph I offer a sincere thank you for providing overarching guidance to me not only on this project, but throughout my doctoral studies by selflessly stepping in after the death of Dr. Mary Neth. Thank you. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ ii ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... iv Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................1 2. THE FARM TECHNOLOGY REVOLUTION .....................................................22 3. MIGRATION, SCHOOL CONSOLIDATION, RURAL SOCIAL CHANGE AND THE COST-PRICE SQUEEZE: CONFRONTING THE PROBLEMS OF THE POST-WAR TECHNOLOGY REVOLUTION………………………………73 4. “AS AMERICAN AS BARN-RAISINGS AND HOT DOGS”………………...125 5. “AN AMERICAN EXPORT OF HOPE:” AGRICULTURAL POLICY IN THE TRUMAN YEARS…………………………………………………………..167 6. FARM POLICY DURING THE EISENHOWER YEARS…………………….217 7. 1962: STATE REAPPORTIONMENT, THE COMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE NATIONAL FARMERS ORGANIZATION…………………………………………………………...267 8. CONCLUSION: AMERICANS NOSTALGIC FOR THE RURAL PAST……309 APPENDIX 1. TABLE OF FARM POPULATION, FARM NUNBERS, FARM SIZE .............319 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................320 VITA ................................................................................................................................351 iii THE FAMILY FARM IN THE POST-WORLD WAR II ERA: INDUSTRIALIZATION, THE COLD WAR AND POLITICAL SYMBOL Ryan Stockwell Dr. Catherine Rymph, Dissertation Supervisor ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the particular path of technological change after World War II, how farm people adjusted to that change in their work and identity, as well as the policy implications of the numerous ramifications of the 20th century farm technology revolution. The rapid farm population decline that began with World War II continued to the end of the 20th century. This farm population loss combined with growing commodity surpluses, a Cold War atmosphere, and the transformation of farms into modern businesses to create tensions within federal farm policy that had for decades pursued the unified goals of improved farm living, increased production and technological adoption. “The farm problem,” as it became known, highlighted the popular concern that farming was changing too quickly and would result in the extinction of the family farm, an ideal based on the agrarian myth but shaped by modern concerns of the growth of corporate farming and the international presence of collective farming in the Soviet Union. Under such conditions, tensions arose within farm policy between the older values and new concerns for the continuation of the family farm. These tensions often resulted in jumbled and contradictory federal farm policy that failed to stem the loss of smaller farms or the implementation of more technology. iv The Family Farm in the Post-World War II Era: Industrialization, the Cold War and Political Symbol Located along Interstate-72, in the gently rolling farmland of western Illinois, stands a weathered sign announcing to passersby the commodity prices farmers received at the time compared to prices sought by farmers. Voicing complaint with not only farm prices, but the many farm policies that determined the condition and situation of millions of farm families, the sign, now in obvious disrepair and surrounded by tall grass and brush, stands as a symbol of what became of so many of farmers struggling with low income due to narrowing profit margins. This sign indicates a problem experienced by so many farmers in the post-world War II period, namely low income compared to costs. It does not, however, explain how this problem developed or tell of the many factors that provide the context, notably the rapid technological changes in agriculture in the period after the Second World War. Yet, by calling for higher prices the sign directly protested U.S. farm policy in the post-World War II era, which for a variety of complicated and often contradictory reasons could and would do little to alleviate farmers’ problems. In many ways, the sign stands as a crude historical monument to the condition of post-war American agriculture, the farm policies implemented and the values that provided the basis for farm policy. Moreover, the sign indicates the language of farm protest that developed in light of the countless changes in American agriculture during the time of its fastest and largest revolution that had shaken agriculture and all of its participants to the 1 core. The post-World War II period proved to be a transformative time for American farmers when technological changes in farm production tools led to monumental developments in agricultural policy, political rhetoric, and farmer mentality. Within each of these developments, the family farm became a concept that invoked powerful meaning that, in the end, has had lasting historical significance. Before the U.S. became involved in World War II, farm population totaled over 30.5 million and represented 23 percent of the total population, a minority, but still considerable portion of the population.1 Farming was still the largest occupation. An overwhelming majority of farmers throughout the Midwest and South lived in conditions reminiscent of the 19th century. Less than 36 percent of rural residents enjoyed the convenience of electricity in their homes; the same could be said of running water.2 Most rural children received at best an 8th grade education in one-room schools despite the early efforts of reformers in the Country Life Movement, a movement which failed in its attempt to bring rural America into the 20th century and up to speed with urban America. A majority of farmers had basic, and often suspect, mud roads as their only physical connection to urban areas. For the most part, the radio (if the farm had electricity or battery power) offered the only connection to the outside world. Overwhelmingly, farming in most regions of the nation still consisted of many small-scale enterprises, limited by the labor and capital of farmers. Animals provided the main source of power, even, ironically, into the threshold of the atomic age and despite the invention of the gasoline powered tractor in the 1920s. 1 R. Douglas Hurt, Problems of Plenty: The American Farmer in the Twentieth Century (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2002), 120. 2 Lowry Nelson, American Farm Life (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954), 36. 2 World War II, however, marked the beginning of several revolutions that ultimately reshaped rural America, especially farming. Between 1945 and the 1960s, farming experienced a technological revolution that irreversibly and completely altered food production. Throughout the 1940s and 1950s, tractors quickly replaced mules and horses; so quickly, in fact, that the USDA census of agriculture stopped counting draft animals in 1959 there were so few to count. Scientific advancements in seeds, animal genetics, fertilizers and agricultural chemicals that were developed in the 1930s or during World War II became widely accepted and implemented by farmers who finally had the necessary capital, but also because they had particular forces in the post-war period pushing them to do
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Monterey County Ranch Map Atlas 89 Pages Standard
    2D 2E 2F TOM BENGARD RANCH INC. D'ARRIGO BROS. CO. OF CALIFORNIA 14S03E35 WEST HANSEN RANCH 52 14S03E36 RANCH 22 S USDA AG RESEARCH STATION 14S04E31 a HARTNELL RANCH-USDA D'ARRIGO BROS. CO. OF CALIFORNIA 14S04E32 l RANCH 22 PEZZINI BERRY FARMS 14S04E33 i BE BERRY FARMS 14S04E34 n GAMBETTA RANCH HARTNELL RANCH ALLAN W. JOHNSON & SON-ORGANIC a HOME RANCH s A i r TRIANGLE FARMS INC. ROBERT SILVA FARMS (ORGANIC) p HARTNELL RANCH o WILLIAMS/DAVIS/MILLER RANCH 07 o D'ARRIGO BROS. CO. OF CALIFORNIA r ROBERT SILVA FARMS (ORGANIC) RANCH 22 t CHRISTENSEN & GIANNINI LLC. A DAGGETT/HEDBERG SOUTH MORTENSEN RANCH L A B B ALLAN W. JOHNSON & SON A A Z FUENTES FARMS R JOHNSON & SON HOME RANCH LAURITSON RANCH D IN BUCIO FARMS ORGANIC RICKY'S FARMS SAN ANTONIO RANCH 184 ZABALA RD. 15S03E02 SUNLIGHT BERRY FARMS INC. 15S03E01 15S04E06 LAURITSON RANCH MERRILL FARMS LLC. - VEGETABLE 15S04E05 O CHRISTENSEN & GIANNINI LLC. ALLAN W. JOHNSON & SON L 15S04E04 NORTON RANCH D ALISAL RANCH WILSON RANCH 15S04E03 ROBERT SILVA FARMS S T LAURITSON RANCH A ALLAN W. JOHNSON & SON NIXON RANCH G E MERRILL FARMS LLC. - VEGETABLE ALLAN W. JOHNSON & SON-ORGANIC AIRPORT RANCH NIXON ORGANIC RANCH ALLAN W. JOHNSON & SON-ORGANIC NIXON ORGANIC RANCH G & H FARMS LLC. ORGANIC CHRISTENSEN & GIANNINI LLC. ALISAL RANCH CUMMINGS RANCH ALLAN W. JOHNSON & SON G & H FARMS GONZALEZ ORGANIC FARMS NIXON RANCH ALLAN W. JOHNSON & SON BARDIN RANCH ZABALA RANCH NIXON RANCH GONZALEZ ORGANIC FARMS MORESCO FARMS INC. SUN COAST GROWERS G & H FARMS GONZALEZ RANCH ALISAL RANCH HARDEN RANCH 5 ROBERT SILVA FARMS ZABALA ROAD BAY FRESH PRODUCER ZABALA RANCH 10 ROBERT SILVA FARMS HARTNELL RANCH SUN COAST RANCH 11 15S03E11 15S03E12 15S04E07 ROBERT SILVA FARMS GARCIA HOME RANCH 2 15S04E08 L 15S04E09 D'ARRIGO BROS.
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILY FARM the Next Generation
    FAMILY FARM The Next Generation © AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ESTATE PLANNING ATTORNEYS, INC. Family Farm: The Next Generation 1 INTRODUCTION A humorous take on how families pass on businesses, such as family farms, is reflected in this quip: Avenge your children; give them equal shares in your business. Certainly, what can seem like a generous, wonderful thing can be rife with conflict and imbalance, if you don’t take steps to implement the appropriate legal framework. Landowners, ranchers, and farmers face unique challenges surrounding how to preserve the family farm; a symbol of their heritage. This report focuses on the legal and management issues of managing the family farm, and steps you can take to ensure the smooth transition from generation to generation with ease and accuracy. PLANNING IS KEY Whether your family is running a farm, managing a large parcel of land, or operating a chain of feed stores, transitions in stock ownership — either through death, retirement, divorce, or just the desire to sell one’s shares — can cause turmoil in the family. But harmony can be maintained, and many difficult family business circumstances can be anticipated and planned for, if everyone agrees in advance how situations will be handled. The key word, however, in this statement is: advance. As with most situations, being prepared ahead of time means the difference between getting it right and seeing it with hindsight. For this purpose there are buy-sell agreements, which are basically contracts that specify certain rights among the owners of a family business. Sometimes a buy-sell agreement is incorporated into a Living Trust, other times it is a separate document.
    [Show full text]
  • March 30 2018 Seminole Tribune
    BC cattle steer into Brooke Simpson relives time Heritage’s Stubbs sisters the past on “The Voice” win state title COMMUNITY v 7A Arts & Entertainment v 4B SPORTS v 1C Volume XLII • Number 3 March 30, 2018 National Folk Museum 7,000-year-old of Korea researches burial site found Seminole dolls in Manasota Key BY LI COHEN Duggins said. Copy Editor Paul Backhouse, director of the Ah-Tah- Thi-Ki Museum, found out about the site about six months ago. He said that nobody BY LI COHEN About two years ago, a diver looking for Copy Editor expected such historical artifacts to turn up in shark teeth bit off a little more than he could the Gulf of Mexico and he, along with many chew in Manasota Key. About a quarter-mile others, were surprised by the discovery. HOLLYWOOD — An honored Native off the key, local diver Joshua Frank found a “We have not had a situation where American tradition is moving beyond the human jaw. there’s organic material present in underwater horizon of the U.S. On March 14, a team of After eventually realizing that he had context in the Gulf of Mexico,” Backhouse researchers from the National Folk Museum a skeletal centerpiece sitting on his kitchen said. “Having 7,000-year-old organic material of Korea visited the Hollywood Reservation table, Frank notified the Florida Bureau of surviving in salt water is very surprising and to learn about the history and culture Archaeological Research. From analyzing that surprise turned to concern because our surrounding Seminole dolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Costs for Beef Cattle, Cow-Calf Production
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AGRICULTURAL ISSUES CENTER UC DAVIS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS SAMPLE COSTS FOR BEEF CATTLE COW – CALF PRODUCTION 300 Head NORTHERN SACRAMENTO VALLEY 2017 Larry C. Forero UC Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor, Shasta County. Roger Ingram UC Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor, Placer and Nevada Counties. Glenn A. Nader UC Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor, Sutter/Yuba/Butte Counties. Donald Stewart Staff Research Associate, UC Agricultural Issues Center and Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC Davis Daniel A. Sumner Director, UC Agricultural Issues Center, Costs and Returns Program, Professor, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC Davis Beef Cattle Cow-Calf Operation Costs & Returns Study Sacramento Valley-2017 UCCE, UC-AIC, UCDAVIS-ARE 1 UC AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AGRICULTURAL ISSUES CENTER UC DAVIS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS SAMPLE COSTS FOR BEEF CATTLE COW-CALF PRODUCTION 300 Head Northern Sacramento Valley – 2017 STUDY CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 ASSUMPTIONS 3 Production Operations 3 Table A. Operations Calendar 4 Revenue 5 Table B. Monthly Cattle Inventory 6 Cash Overhead 6 Non-Cash Overhead 7 REFERENCES 9 Table 1. COSTS AND RETURNS FOR BEEF COW-CALF PRODUCTION 10 Table 2. MONTHLY COSTS FOR BEEF COW-CALF PRODUCTION 11 Table 3. RANGING ANALYSIS FOR BEEF COW-CALF PRODUCTION 12 Table 4. EQUIPMENT, INVESTMENT AND BUSINESS OVERHEAD 13 INTRODUCTION The cattle industry in California has undergone dramatic changes in the last few decades. Ranchers have experienced increasing costs of production with a lack of corresponding increase in revenue. Issues such as international competition, and opportunities, new regulatory requirements, changing feed costs, changing consumer demand, economies of scale, and competing land uses all affect the economics of ranching.
    [Show full text]
  • Truman, Congress and the Struggle for War and Peace In
    TRUMAN, CONGRESS AND THE STRUGGLE FOR WAR AND PEACE IN KOREA A Dissertation by LARRY WAYNE BLOMSTEDT Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2008 Major Subject: History TRUMAN, CONGRESS AND THE STRUGGLE FOR WAR AND PEACE IN KOREA A Dissertation by LARRY WAYNE BLOMSTEDT Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Terry H. Anderson Committee Members, Jon R. Bond H. W. Brands John H. Lenihan David Vaught Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger May 2008 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT Truman, Congress and the Struggle for War and Peace in Korea. (May 2008) Larry Wayne Blomstedt, B.S., Texas State University; M.S., Texas A&M University-Kingsville Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Terry H. Anderson This dissertation analyzes the roles of the Harry Truman administration and Congress in directing American policy regarding the Korean conflict. Using evidence from primary sources such as Truman’s presidential papers, communications of White House staffers, and correspondence from State Department operatives and key congressional figures, this study suggests that the legislative branch had an important role in Korean policy. Congress sometimes affected the war by what it did and, at other times, by what it did not do. Several themes are addressed in this project. One is how Truman and the congressional Democrats failed each other during the war. The president did not dedicate adequate attention to congressional relations early in his term, and was slow to react to charges of corruption within his administration, weakening his party politically.
    [Show full text]
  • Choices and Constraints in the Pre-Industrial Countryside
    Choices and Constraints in the Pre-Industrial Countryside Sheilagh Ogilvie Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge [email protected] CWPESH no. 1 Plenary Lecture for Population, Economy and Welfare, c. 1200 – 2000: a Conference in Honour of Richard Smith , Cambridge, 16 September 2011 Abstract : This paper explores a key implication of Richard Smith’s work on agrarian societies: the need to be attentive both to rural people’s decisions as economic agents and to the constraints on their choices. It begins by examining evidence of goal- maximizing behaviour by rural people – not just peasant farmers but women, servants, serfs, landless workers, youths, and many others – in a diversity of pre-industrial societies. It then analyses some central constraints within which rural people made their choices: family and inheritance systems, village communities, manorial systems, legal rules and customs, and the actions of rulers. It concludes by discussing the implications of these findings for understanding the functioning of rural economies, now widely recognized as central to long-term improvements in economic growth and human well-being. 1 1. Introduction This paper explores a central implication of Richard Smith’s work on agrarian societies: the need to be attentive both to rural people’s decisions as economic agents and to the constraints on those choices. As early as 1979, Smith pointed out that although people in the pre-modern English countryside made individualistic choices, ‘This does not necessarily require us to approach this society with a purely voluntaristic model of social behaviour for we have to define the structural limits within which people interacted’.
    [Show full text]
  • Mm- Conferences I (5/12/98)
    Guide to the Papers of HYDE H. MURRAY LEGISLATION BY SUBJECT • = publication Box File Subject Description Date 85 1 Agricultural Act of 1948 Act- Public Law 897 80th Congress H.R. 6248 1948 85 2 Discussion of Title II of the Agricultural act of 1948 1948 85 3 Hearings before the special subcommittee on 1949 agriculture house of representative 85 4 Bills- H.R. 5345 (agricultural adjustment act), and 1949 a copy of Act- PL 439 81st Congress 85 5 Summary of Principal Provision; Agricultural 1949 Adjustment Act of 1949 85 6 Reports: 1948, - Farm Price Support Program 1949 - Agricultural Act of 1949 - Agricultural Act of 1949: Conference report - Agricultural Bill of 1948: Conference report 85 7 Bills: copies of H.R.6969, 4618, 4523, 4296, 4297, 1975 3543, 3187, 1290, 85 8 Agricultural Act 1949: Mexican Farm Labor Amendments: Amend H.R. 8195 offered by Mr. 1963 Roosevelt; Point of Order—Amendment to Sec. 503 of PL 78, Amendment to H.R. 8195 85 9 Bills– H.R.1836, 2009, 5215, 5195, 5497, 6719, 1963 8195, Corr, and Statement- Explanation of a Draft Bill to Amend the Mexican Labor Program 85 10 Bills (Senate): copy of S1703 1963 85 11 • Article- Lobbyist Use Pressure for Braceros Bill, 1963 Post Oct. 31, 1963 • News Letter- AFBR Official News Letter, Nov. 11, 1963 85 12 Agricultural Act 1949: Mexican Farm Labor Report- Report of Operations of Mexican farm Labor 1963 Program Made Pursuant to Conference Report No. 1449 House of Representatives 84th Congress, first Session, Re Use of Mexican Workers Does Not Depress Farm Wages, Notes, Witness List of Equipment, Supplies and Manpower Subcommittee 85 13 Reports: 1963 - Extension of Mexican Farm Labor Program, Report, Aug 6, 1963 - One- Year Extension of Mexican Farm Labor Program, Report, Sept 6, 1963 BAYLOR COLLECTIONS OF POLITICAL MATERIALS 3/22/2004 W A C O , T E X A S P A G E 1 Guide to the Papers of HYDE H.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Approaches to Resolving Dissension Among Owners of the Family Farm
    University of Arkansas [email protected] ∙ (479) 575-7646 An Agricultural Law Research Article Judicial Approaches to Resolving Dissension Among Owners of the Family Farm by Steven C. Bahls Originally published in NEBRASKA LAW REVIEW 73 NEB. L. REV. 14 (1994) www.NationalAgLawCenter.org Steven C. Bahls* Judicial Approaches to Resolving Dissension Among Owners of the Family Farm TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction........................................... 15 II. Attributes of Family-Owned Farms. .................... 16 A. Public Policy Favoring Preservation of Family Farms............................................. 16 B. Structure of the Family Farm 18 III. The Problem of Dissension Among Owners of Family Farms................................................. 20 A. Causes of Dissension. .............................. 20 B. Difficulty in Resolving Dissension in Family Farm Businesses ......................................... 23 IV. Legislative and Judicial Approaches to Resolving Dissension Among Owners of the Family Farm . 29 A. The Montana Trilogy of Cases ...................... 30 B. Cases from Other Jurisdictions. .................... 33 C. Legislative Approaches............................. 37 V. Proposed Judicial Standard for Resolving Dissension Among the Owners of the Family Farm 38 A. Dissension in Farm Corporations . 39 1. Threshold Standards for Judicial Intervention. 39 B. Dissension in Farm Partnerships and Farm Limited Liability Companies. ............................... 45 VI. Conclusion............................................. 47 Copyright held by the NEBRASKA LAw REVIEW. * Associate Dean and Professor, The University of Montana School of Law; B.B.A., 1976, University of Iowa; J.D., 1979, Northwestern University. The author is a member of the Board of Directors of the American Agricultural Law Association. The author wishes to thank Rodney K. Smith, Dean ofthe University ofMontana School of Law, and James T. Towe, The University of Montana School of Law, Class of 1994, for their assistance with this article.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Choices and Constraints in the Pre-Industrial Countryside
    10 Choices and Constraints in the Pre-Industrial Countryside SHEILAGH OGILVIE This chapter addresses a central tension between two sides of rural history – one stressing peasant choices, the other the constraints on those choices. For the one side, key concepts are ‘individualism’, ‘autonomy’, ‘ration- ality’, ‘voluntarism’, and ‘agency’. For the other, they are ‘class struggle’, ‘exploitation’, ‘extra-economic coercion’, ‘social structure’, and ‘institu- tions’. This chapter argues that both strands of analysis can deepen our understanding of the pre-industrial countryside – not just in England but in many other societies. But pursuing the one and ignoring the other can lead us astray. Only by attentiveness both to people’s choices and to the constraints on those choices can we arrive at a just understanding of the particular rural society we are studying and of rural development more widely. Choices Let us begin by considering whether rural people in pre-industrial societies really did have choices, in the sense of deciding, as individuals, between two or more possibilities. It is surprising how often one still encounters views to the contrary, sometimes explicit, sometimes implicit and hardly recognised by the scholars who enunciate them. These views take four main forms. First is the view put forward by Alexander Chayanov and his modern followers, that peasants were governed by a mentality that did not view certain aspects of life as choice variables. So in the Chayanovian view, 2211 (Boydell - Population, Welfare).indd 269 04/11/2014 2:26 pm 270 sHeilaGH oGILVIE peasants do not make individual choices about labour, capital, farm size, technology, market participation, or consumption style.
    [Show full text]
  • June 1-15, 1972
    RICHARD NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD DOCUMENT DOCUMENT SUBJECT/TITLE OR CORRESPONDENTS DATE RESTRICTION NUMBER TYPE 1 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 6/2/1972 A Appendix “B” 2 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 6/5/1972 A Appendix “A” 3 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 6/6/1972 A Appendix “A” 4 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 6/9/1972 A Appendix “A” 5 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 6/12/1972 A Appendix “B” COLLECTION TITLE BOX NUMBER WHCF: SMOF: Office of Presidential Papers and Archives RC-10 FOLDER TITLE President Richard Nixon’s Daily Diary June 1, 1972 – June 15, 1972 PRMPA RESTRICTION CODES: A. Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy. E. Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or B. National security classified information. financial information. C. Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual’s F. Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for law rights. enforcement purposes. D. Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy G. Withdrawn and return private and personal material. or a libel of a living person. H. Withdrawn and returned non-historical material. DEED OF GIFT RESTRICTION CODES: D-DOG Personal privacy under deed of gift -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION *U.S. GPO; 1989-235-084/00024 NA 14021 (4-85) THF WHITE ,'OUSE PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON'S DAILY DIARY (Sec Travel Record for Travel AnivilY) f PLACE DAY BEGAN DATE (Mo., Day. Yr.) _u.p.-1:N_E I, 1972 WILANOW PALACE TIME DAY WARSAW, POLi\ND 7;28 a.m. THURSDAY PHONE TIME P=Pl.ccd R=Received ACTIVITY 1----.,------­ ----,----j In Out 1.0 to 7:28 P The President requested that his Personal Physician, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Farm Bills, National Agricultural Law Center
    A research project from The National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information University of Arkansas • [email protected] • (479) 575-7646 Agricultural Act of 1949 Pub. L. No. 81-439, 63 Stat. 1051 (Originally cited as ch. 792, 63 Stat. 1051) The digitization of this Act was performed by the University of Arkansas’s National Agricultural Law Center under Cooperative Agreement No. 58-8201-4-197 with the United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Library. 6,;3 STAT.] 31sT CONG., 1ST SESS.~CHS. 791, 792-QCT. 31, 1949 1051 [CHAPTER 792J AN ACT OctobN 31, HH9 To stabilize prices of agricultural commodities. [H. R. 5.145] JPublic Law 439] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representative" of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may Agricultural Act of be cited as the"Agricultural Act of 1949". D49. TITLE I-BASIC AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES PrIce support to co· S>:c. 101. The Secretary of AgricuJture (hereinafter called the operators. "Secretary") is authorized and directed to make available throngh loans, purchases, or other operations, price support to cooperators for any crop of any basic agricultural commodity, if producers have not disapproved marketing quotas for such crop, at a level not in excess of 90 per centum of the parity priee of the commodity nor less than the level provided in subsections (a), (b), and (c) as follows: The level of support shall be not less (a) For tobacco (except as otherwise provided herein), corn, than the follow- "heat and rice, If the supply percentage
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Into Soil & Water 2019
    GETTING INTO SOIL & WATER 2019 GETTING INTO SOIL & WATER 2019 1 GETTING INTO SOIL & WATER CELEBRATING 10 YEARS 2019 Edition A publication of the Soil & Water Conservation Club at Iowa State University™ A publication of the Soil & Water Conservation Club 2 GETTING INTO SOIL & WATER 2019 Table of Proudly Presenting GISW 2019 Jacob Wright, Shannon Breja and Justin Hunter Contents 2019 Editors Letter from our Editors ................. 2 In its tenth year, Getting into Soil and Water is Jacob Wright, Shannon Breja and Justin packed full of great articles that we are excited to “The goal of this Hunter share with you. The goal of this year’s publication Improving our Soil and Water is to showcase the diversity of opportunities year’s publication Resources with Biochar ................ 4 within soil and water. Our team of three co- Deborah Aller, PhD editors is made up of Jacob Wright, Shannon is to showcase Soil Survey at Your Fingertips....... 6 Breja, and Justin Hunter. We wanted to share with Skye Wills, PhD you a little bit about ourselves and what soil and the diversity of Redefning Water Automation and water conservation means to us. Conservation Practices in Hawaii ...... 8 Dan Clegg Jacob Wright: opportunities within I am a junior in Getting Started with No-Till and Cover Crop System ...................... 10 agronomy and soil and water.” Steve Berger environmental Cultivating a Legacy: Water for the studies and joined Justin Hunter: I am Next Generation .......................... 12 the Soil and Water a junior in agronomy Trygve Lien Conservation Club and joined the Soil and Working with Nature Following in the spring of Water Conservation Wildfre in California ...................
    [Show full text]