DOCSLIB.ORG

Nearshore Fish and Macroinvertebrate Assemblages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nearshore Fish and Macroinvertebrate Assemblages Administration United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Laboratories Department of Environmental Research Joe Commerce Seattle WA 98115 L lie EPA 600 7 80 027 United States Office of Environmental Environmental Protection Engmeering and Technology January 1980 DC 20460 PA Agency Washington Researdl and Development Nearshore Fish and Macroinvertebrate Assemblages Along the Strait of Juan de Fuca Including Food Habits of the Common Nearshore Fish Interagency Energy Environment R D Program Report 4lII i J I I 1 I i I 11 n I RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES I Research reports of the Office of Research and Development U S Environmental Protection a f Agency have been grouped into nine series These nine broad cate gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en vironmental technology Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields a I The nine series are I I 1 Environmental Health Effects Research I 2 Environmental Protection Technology o I 3 Ecological Research 4 Environmental Monitoring 5 Socioeconomic Environmental Studies o 6 SCientific and Technical Assessment Reports STAR 7 Interagency Energy Environment Research and Development 8 Special Reports o 9 Mi scellaneous Repons This report has been assigned to the INTERAGENCY ENERGY ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT series Reports in this series result from the o effort funded under the 17 agency Federal Energy Environment Research and Development Program These studies relate to EPA s miSSion to protect the public health and welfare from adverse effects of pollutants associated with energy sys terns The goal of the Program is to assure the rapid development of domestic o energy supplies in an environmentally compatible manner by providing the nec essary environmental data and control technology Investigations include analy ses of the transport of energy related pOllutants and their health and ecological o effects assessments of and development of control technologies for energy and assessments systems integrated of a wide range of energy related environ mental issues D o o U U1 This document is available to the public through the National Technicallnforma tion Service Springfield Virginia 22161 u u I m NEARSHORE FISH AND MACRO INVERTEBRATE D ASSEMBLAGES ALONG THE STRAIT OF JUAN DE FUCA INCLUDING FOOD HABITS OF THE COMMON NEARSHORE FISH I Final Report of Three Years Sampling 1976 1979 n by I Bruce S Miller Principal Investigator Charles A Simenstad Project Leader Fish Food Habits Jeffrey N Cross Research Associate Nearshore Demersal and Intertidal Fishes Kurt L Fresh I Research Assistant Neritic Fishes and S Nancy Steinfort Fish Biologist Fish Food Habits I Fisheries Research Institute College of Fisheries University of Washington I Seattle Washington 98195 I Prepared for MESA Marine Ecosystems Analysis Puget Sound Project I Seattle Washington in partial fulfillment of EPA Interagency Agreement No D6 E693 EN I Program Element No EHE 625 A I This study was conducted as part of the Feder al Interagency Energy Environment I Research and Development Program I Prepared for OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY I OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D C 20460 I January 1980 I I I I Completion Report Submitted to I PUGET SOUND ENERGY RELATED RESEARCH PROJECT OFFICE OF MARINE POLLUTION ASSESSMENT NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION I by Fisheries Research Institute I College of Fisheries University of Washington Seattle Washington 98195 I I I I I I I DISCLAIMER This work is the result of research sponsored by the Environmental I Protection Agency and administered by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration I The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA does not approve recommend or endorse any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned in this publication No reference shall be made to I NOAA or to this publication furnished by NOAA in any advertising or sales promotion which endorses any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned herein or which has as its purpose an intent to cause directly or indirectly the advertised product to be used or purchased because of I this publication I ii I I I ABSTRACT m A seasonal survey of nearshore fishes was made in the Strait of Juan de Fuca from May 1976 to June 1979 A beach seine was used for sampling I nearshore demersal fishes and a townet for nearshore pelagic fishes inter tidal fishes were sampled with the use of anesthetic and a hand net During 1976 1978 the maeroinvertebrates caught incidentally in the beach seine I and townet were also recorded Data recorded for fish and macroinvertebrates were species present life history stage from size abundance biomass food habits and presence of external abnormalities or disease I The total number of nearshore demersal and pelagic fish species decreased from east to west in the Strait of Juan de Fuca but the total number of inter tidal species increased however it was postulated that this opposite trend D was due to the same habitat relationship species diversity increased as habitat heterogeneity increased Nearshore demersal and pelagic fish catches were dominated by juvenile and larval life history stages while intertidal collections were primarily adults and juveniles There is little overlap I between the nearshore demersal pelagic fish assemblages and the intertidal fish assemblages and there is no evidence that the rocky intertidal is sig nificantly utilized by the common subtidal species as a spawning or nursery I area Common nearshore demersal fishes were the flatfish and sculpins while I herring clearly predominated in the nearshore pelagic zone although smelt and Pacific sand lance were also important The common rocky intertidal fishes were the sculpins and pricklebacks 1 e eel blennies I Seasonal trends were pronounced in the nearshore demersal and pelagic fishes but largely absent in the rocky intertidal fishes Nearshore demersal species were generally at their maximum number of species abundance biomass I in the summer and at their minimum in the winter although at the protected sites the maximum often extended from spring through fall Nearshore pelagic species were at their maximum in the spring summer and at a minimum in the I winter The common fish species found in this survey were categorized into nine functional feeding groups based on their stomach contents The most impor I tant food item found was epibenthic zooplankton for nearshore demersal fishes while pelagic nearshore fishes fed primarily on pelagic zooplankton Size I selection was indicated by fish preying on zooplankton This study was set up as a first time survey of the fishes of the Strait of Juan de Fuca However it also demonstrated that there is a great deal I of variation from year to year season to season from site to site and between hauls How much of this is sampling variation and how much is natural biological variation was not determined although we believe most is natural biological variation To statistically use the data attained in this study I to assess the result of a perturbation on nearshore fishes in the Strait of Juan de Fuca would require that the abundance of nearshore demersal fishes be decreased by about 75 to be detected and would require that the nearshore I pelagic fishes be decreased by about 95 to be detected We believe the in formation is better used to help in predicting the results of various man induced alterations proposed for the Strait of Juan de Fuca I iii I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS D Abstract iii List of Tables vi List of Figures ix n List of Appendices x Acknowledgments xii D 1 Introduction 1 2 Conclusions 2 g 3 Materials and Methods 6 3 1 Study Sites and Sampling Frequency 6 3 2 Sampling Techniques 6 3 3 Collection Information 10 I 3 4 Biological Information 10 3 5 Processing the Catches 11 3 6 Stomach Analyses 11 I 3 7 Possible Sources of Error 11 3 8 Definitions and Statistics 12 3 9 Disposition of Data 15 I 3 10 Species Nomenclature 15 4 Results and Discussion 16 4 1 Oceanographic Conditions 16 I 4 2 Nearshore Fish Species Composition 16 4 3 Nearshore Fish Species Richness 30 4 4 Nearshore Fish Density 39 I 4 5 Nearshore Fish Standing Crop 50 4 6 Occurrence of Fin Rot Lesions Tumors and Parasites 56 I 4 7 Detecting Changes in Fish Abundance and Biomass after a Perturbation 62 4 8 Macroinvertebrates 67 4 9 Food Web Relationships 71 I 4 10 Potential Effects of Petroleum Hydrocarbons on the Nearshore Fish Communities along the Strait of I Juan de Fuca 105 5 Literature Cited 111 I 6 Appendices 116 I I I v I I LIST OF TABLES I Number Page I 1 Characterization of study sites along the Strait of Juan de Fuca 8 I 2 IRI table 14 3 Summary of stepwise multiple linear regression of log abundance and log weight against temperature salinity I and dissolved oxygen for beach seine catches 17 4 Summary of stepwise multiple linear regression of log I abundance and log weight against temperature salinity and dissolved oxygen for townet catches 18 I 5 Number of species collected by each sampling method 19 6 Nearshore fish species collected by beach seine townet and tidepool 20 I 7 Rank order of the most abundant fishes in beach seine collections 22 I 8 Regularly occurring and abundant species in beach seine collections by site and by season for each of the study years 23 I 9 Rank order of the most abundant fishes in townet collections 27 I 10 Regularly occurring and abundant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bay, Oregon, with Notes on Shehfish Temperature, and Physical
    COASTAL RIVERS I NFORMAT I ON Observations onon FishFish LiistributDistribution ion inin TillamookTillamook Bay, Oregon,Oregon, wi-f-h with NotesNotes on ShellfishSheHfish Temperature, and Physical Characteristics by T. Edwin Cummings Richard L. Berry Fish Commission of Oregon Management and Research Division This work was conducted in cooperation with -f-hethe NationaJ National Marine Fisheries Service under the AnadromousFish Act PL 89-304 April 19741974 4 CONTENTS Page No. I NTRODUCT I(ON ON DESCRIPTION OF ThETHE AREA. METHODS.......................................................... 4 Seining Sites. 4 Equipment . 5 Data Recorded 5 RESULTS ..................................................................................................................... 5 Coho. Chinook. Herr! ng. .................................................... 12 Smell-..ei I 2 Sole..So I e.. 13 StanyFyFlounder Flounder............................................................ 13 SurfPerch .................................................................................................... 13 Col-tids....................... .,....... ..................... 14 MiscellaneousMiscellaneousFish Fish SpeciesSpecies.................................. 14 Shellfish................................................... 14 Temperature ................................................. 17 DISCUSSION. 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. 19 LITERATURE CITED. 19 APPEND IX 20 FIGURES fj9urefure No.No. Page No. I Map of Tillamook Bay,Bay, OregonOregon 3 2 Presence ofof FishesFishes inin thethe Ti
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Socioeconomic Monitoring of the Olympic National Forest and Three Local Communities
    NORTHWEST FOREST PLAN THE FIRST 10 YEARS (1994–2003) Socioeconomic Monitoring of the Olympic National Forest and Three Local Communities Lita P. Buttolph, William Kay, Susan Charnley, Cassandra Moseley, and Ellen M. Donoghue General Technical Report United States Forest Pacific Northwest PNW-GTR-679 Department of Service Research Station July 2006 Agriculture The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all pro- grams.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Selected California Fisheries for 2013
    FISHERIES REVIEW CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 55, 2014 REVIEW OF SELECTED CALIFORNIA FISHERIES FOR 2013: COASTAL PELAGIC FINFISH, MARKET SQUID, GROUNDFISH, HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES, DUNGENESS CRAB, BASSES, SURFPERCH, ABALONE, KELP AND EDIBLE ALGAE, AND MARINE AQUACULTURE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Marine Region 4665 Lampson Ave. Suite C Los Alamitos, CA 90720 Dianna.Porzio@wildlife.ca.gov SUMMARY ings of northern anchovy were 6,005 t with an ex-vessel In 2013, commercial fisheries landed an estimated revenue of greater than $1.0 million. When compared 165,072 metric tons (t) of fish and invertebrates from to landings in 2012, this represents a 141% and 191% California ocean waters (fig. 1). This represents an increase in volume and value, respectively. Nearly all increase of almost 2% from the 162,290 t landed in 2012, (93.6%; 5,621.5 t) of California’s 2013 northern anchovy but still an 11% decrease from the 184,825 t landed catch was landed in the Monterey port area. Landings of in 2011, and a 35% decline from the peak landings of jack mackerel remained relatively low with 892 t landed; 252,568 t observed in 2000. The preliminary ex-vessel however, this represents a 515% increase over 2012 land- economic value of commercial landings in 2013 was ings of 145 t. $254.7 million, increasing once again from the $236 mil- Dungeness crab ranked as California’s second largest lion generated in 2012 (8%), and the $198 million in volume fishery with 14,066 t landed, an increase from 2011 (29%). 11,696 t landed in 2012, and it continued to dominate as Coastal pelagic species (CPS) made up four of the the highest valued fishery in the state with an ex-vessel top five volume fisheries in 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Redacted for Privacy Ivan Pratt
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarsArchive@OSU AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Alfred Warren Hanson for the Doctor of Philosophy (Name) (Degree) in Zoology presented on/8 1q72 (Major) /71date Title:LIFE CYCLE AND HOST SPECIFICITY OF DICLIDOPHORA sp. (MONOGENEA-DICLIDOPHORIDAE),A PARASITE OF EMBIOTOCID FISHES Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy Ivan Pratt The life cycle of a monogenean, Diclidophora sp. , was studied with special attention to the time required for developmental stages to occur.Eggs are produced by adult worms at the rate of one every 13. 5 minutes and require 32 days tohatchwhen incubated at 12. 5°C and 30.90/00salinity.Rate of development and hatching success are strongly dependent on incubation temperature and salinity. Growth and development of the larval stages are similar to other known species of the family 1T)c1idophoridae.The presence in the oncomiracidium of a precocious set of attachment clampsand the premature loss of larval hooks distinguish it from related species. Oncorniracidia survive approximately 36 hours if no host fish is reached. Larvae attach to the inner lateral borders of primary lamellae of the host fish gill.A second set of clamps is added before the 36th day, the third set soon after the 44th day, and the last pair by the 58th day.Sexual maturity is reached by the 153rd day after hatching. Experimental infections were maintained on redtail surfperch for 203 days. Naturally infected redtail surfperch, silver surfperch and walleye surfperch were collected.Rates of infection with Di clidoph- ora were 38.
    [Show full text]
  • Pysht River Conservation Area
    A Place Worth Getting There: From Port Angeles, drive about 3 miles west on Hwy 101. Turn right onto Hwy 112 Protecting and drive about 37 miles. The parking area is at milepost 24. North Olympic Land Trust is your community nonprofit dedicated to the conservation of open spaces, local food, local resources, healthy watersheds and recreational opportunities. Our long-term Pysht River goal and mission is to conserve lands that sustain the communities of Clallam County. Conservation Area Since 1990, North Olympic Land Trust has permanently conserved: More than 520 acres of local farmland 12 miles of stream and river habitat More than 1,800 602 EAST FRONT ST. P.O. BOX 2945 (MAILING) acres of forestland PORT ANGELES, WASH I NGTON 98362 (360) 417-1815 FOR THE LATEST NEWS | TO EXPLORE THE LAND | TO DONATE: info@northolympiclandtrust.org northolympiclandtrust.org northolympiclandtrust.org Pysht River Habitat Restoration The Pysht River Conservation Area, located 8.7 miles from the mouth of the Pysht River, protects 74 acres of land, including 2/3 mile of the Pysht River, 1,500 feet of Green Creek and four wetlands. The Pysht River is used by coho salmon, cutthroat trout, and steelhead. The Area also is vital for the recovering productivity of chinook and chum salmon. The Makah Tribe led initial restoration efforts within the Area by removing the dilapidated structures and non-native invasive vegetation, and with the help of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, re-planted over 7,000 native trees. Further plantings were completed in partnership with the Clallam Conservation District, USDA Farm Service Agency and Merrill & Ring.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Plan
    CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND This watershed plan for the Hoko-Lyre Watershed provides a comprehensive review and evaluation of vital water resources in Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 19 and lays the groundwork for future management and stewardship of these resources. Located on the Olympic Peninsula (see Figure 1-1), WRIA 19 is a beautiful and remote area with few human inhabitants, though it carries a legacy of large- scale logging throughout the region. Based on the review of water resources, this plan outlines steps for ensuring the optimum ongoing use of the watershed’s surface waters and groundwater in a way that balances water needs for human use and environmental protection. An overview of the important characteristics of WRIA 19 is provided below. Appendix A provides more detailed descriptions of WRIA 19 features that are important for consideration in a watershed plan. Figure 1-1. WRIA 19 and Subbasins 1.1 WHY WAS THIS PLAN DEVELOPED? In 1998, the Washington State Legislature created the Watershed Management Act (Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 90.82) to support local communities in addressing water resource management issues. The act established a voluntary watershed management planning process for the major river basins in the state. The goal of the planning process is to support economic growth while promoting water availability and quality. The Act encourages local governments and interested groups and citizens to assess basin water resources and develop strategies for managing them. The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) defined boundaries that divide the state into WRIAs, which correspond to the watersheds of major rivers, and established funding for groups in each WRIA that choose to undertake the planning process (funding is broken down by phases of the planning 1-1 WRIA 19 Watershed Plan… effort, as described in Appendix B).
    [Show full text]
  • (J3+5Q I-’ /Fq.057 I I SENSITIVITY of COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS and WILDLIFE to SPILLED OIL ALAS KA - SHELIKOF STRAIT REGION
    i (J3+5q i-’ /fq.057 I I SENSITIVITY OF COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS AND WILDLIFE TO SPILLED OIL ALAS KA - SHELIKOF STRAIT REGION - Daniel D. Domeracki, Larry C. Thebeau, Charles D. Getter, James L. Sadd, and Christopher H. Ruby Research Planning Institute, Inc. Miles O. Hayes, President 925 Gervais Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 - with contributions from - Dave Maiero Science Applications, Inc. and Dennis Lees - Dames and Moore PREPARED FOR: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Juneau, Alaska RPI/R/81/2/10-4 Contract No. NA80RACO0154 February 1981 .i i . i ~hou~d read: 11; Caption !s Page 26, Figure four distinct biO1~~~cal rocky shore show~ng algae 2oner and P Exposed (1) barnacle (Balanus glandula) zone, zones: (3) -and ~~~e. blue mussel zone, ~ar-OSUsJ (4) barnacle ~B_ - . 27 -.--d. 29 ..-.A =~na beaches . 31 fixposed tidal flats (low biomass) . 33 Mixed sand and gravel beaches . 35 Gravel beaches . 37 Exposed tidal flats (moderate biomass) . 39 Sheltered rocky shores . ...*.. 41 Sheltered tidal flats . 43 Marshes ● =*...*. 45 Critical Species and Habitats . 47 Marine Mammals . ...*. 48 Coastal Marine Birds. 50 Finish . ...*.. 54 Shellfish . ...**.. ● *...... ...*.. ..* 56 Critical Intertidal Habitats . 58 Salt Marshes . 58 Sheltered Tidal Flats. 59 Sheltered Rocky Shores . 59 Critical Subtidal Habitats . 60 Nearshore Subtidal Habitats . ...*.. 60 Seagrass Beds . ...* ● . 62 Kelp Beds ● . ...**. ● .*...*. ...* . 63 ● . TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) PAGE Discussion of Habitats with Variable to Slight Sensitivity. ...*..... 65 Introduction . 65 Exposed Rocky Shores. 65 Beaches . ● . 66 Exposed Tidal Flats.. 67 Areas of Socioeconomic Importance . 68 Mining Claims . 68 Private Property ● . 69 Public Property . ...*.. 69 Archaeological Sites.
    [Show full text]
  • CASCADE HEAD: Fish Species Present Within Evaluation Area
    CASCADE HEAD: Fish species present within evaluation area EXTENT OF USE: C = Common, M = Minor, R = Rare or incidential use HABITAT: S = Sand, G = Gravel, R = Rock, P = Pelagic, I = Rocky intertidal HARVEST: C = Commercial, R = Recreational NAME USE HABITAT HARVEST Black Rockfish C R C, R Blue Rockfish CR Canary Rockfish CR China Rockfish CR Copper Rockfish CR Juvenile Rockfish spp. C R Quillback Rockfish CR Vermilion Rockfish R Yelloweye Rockfish (juveniles) CR Cabezon CR Red Irish Lord R Sculpin spp. C R, I Chinook Salmon P C, R Coho Salmon P C, R Steelhead P Green Sturgeon P White Sturgeon P Kelp Greenling CR Lingcod CR Rock Greenling R Monkeyface Prickleback R, I Prickleback spp. Sanddab S Pacific Halibut Starry Flounder Poacher spp. Redtail Surfperch S Shiner Surfperch S Striped Surfperch R Walleye Surfperch S Surfperch spp. Gunnel spp. Smelts spp. P Topsmelt Tubesnout Wolf Eel R Cascade Head: Fish Page 1 of 4 NAME USE HABITAT HARVEST Spiny Dogfish P Salmon Shark P White Shark P Leopard Shark Blue Shark P Pacific Angel Shark Big Skate Cascade Head: Fish Page 2 of 4 CASCADE HEAD: Invertebrate & algal species present within evaluation area EXTENT OF USE: C = Common, M = Minor, R = Rare or incidential use HABITAT: S = Sand, G = Gravel, R = Rock, P = Pelagic, I = Rocky intertidal HARVEST: C = Commercial, R = Recreational NAME USE HABITAT HARVEST Coonstripe Shrimp Brown Rock Crab Dungeness Crab C S, GC Mole Crab S Red Rock Crab S Striped Shore Crab Gooseneck Barnacle I Barnacle spp. California Mussel IR Cockle Clam S Scallop spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammals of the Columbia River Estuary
    Marine mammals of the Columbia River estuary Item Type monograph Authors Jeffries, Steven Publisher Washington Department of Game Download date 01/10/2021 09:29:55 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/40552 NOAA LISD SEA LE MARINE MAMMALS OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER ESTUARY I QH 541.5 ==============:::!J • E8 M35 cop.2 [I D 0 [] Final Report on the Marine Mammals Work Unit of the Columbia River Estuary Data Development Program tl MARINE MAMMALS n OF THE u COLUMBIA RIVER ESTUARY ] [] D Contractor: Washington Department of Game 600 N. Capitol Way Olympia, Washington 98504 Principal Investigator: [l Steven Jeffries Washington Department of Game Marine Mammal Investigations ] 53 Portway Street Astoria, Oregon 97103 (503) 325-8241 [l n i . Lj January 1984 ] D ] 7 ~I ,----- • __ J ,----- ,----- D D 0 D WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF GAME □ MARINE MAMMAL INVESTIGATIONS D PROJECT LEADER ~ Steven J. Jeffries □ WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST RESEARCH ANALYST Stephen D. Treacy Anne C. Geiger TYPIST Lynda Stansberry WORD PROCESSING Elizabeth Rummell [] lJ u [] iii J J J J J J ] J ] ] J J J J .J .J □ D D PREFACE The Columbia River Estuary Data Development Program This document is one of a set of publications and other materials [1 produced by the Columbia River Estuary, Data Development Program (CREDDP). CREDDP has two purposes: to increase understanding of the ecology of the Columbia River Estuary and to provide information useful J in making land and water use decisions. The program was initiated by local governments and citizens who saw a need for a better information base for use in managing natural resources and in planning for development.
    [Show full text]
  • Humboldt Bay Fishes
    Humboldt Bay Fishes ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> ·´¯`·._.·´¯`·.. ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> Acknowledgements The Humboldt Bay Harbor District would like to offer our sincere thanks and appreciation to the authors and photographers who have allowed us to use their work in this report. Photography and Illustrations We would like to thank the photographers and illustrators who have so graciously donated the use of their images for this publication. Andrey Dolgor Dan Gotshall Polar Research Institute of Marine Sea Challengers, Inc. Fisheries And Oceanography seachall@aol.com dolgor@inro.ru Michael Lanboeuf Milton Love Michel.Lamboeuf@fao.org Marine Science Institute love@lifesci.ucsb.edu Stephen Metherell Jacques Moreau metherells@seafood.co.nz moreau@ensat.Fr Bernd Ueberschaer Clinton Bauder bueberschaer@ifm.uni-kiel.de gecko1@metridium.com Fish descriptions contained in this report are from: Froese, R. and Pauly, D. Editors. 2003 FishBase. Worldwide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org/ 13 August 2003 Photographer Fish Photographer Bauder, Clinton wolf-eel Gotshall, Daniel W scalyhead sculpin Bauder, Clinton blackeye goby Gotshall, Daniel W speckled sanddab Bauder, Clinton spotted cusk-eel Gotshall, Daniel W. bocaccio Bauder, Clinton tube-snout Gotshall, Daniel W. brown rockfish Gotshall, Daniel W. yellowtail rockfish Flescher, Don american shad Gotshall, Daniel W. dover sole Flescher, Don stripped bass Gotshall, Daniel W. pacific sanddab Gotshall, Daniel W. kelp greenling Garcia-Franco, Mauricio louvar
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Ranked List of Projects for 2015-17 Capital Budget Funding
    Work on the Puyallup River Proposed Ranked List of Projects for 2015-17 Capital Budget Funding Ecology Publication #: 14-06-033 October 2014 / revised February 2019 Proposed Ranked Projects for 2015-17 Capital Budget Funding I,Whitma _,.,J n D C PA R I M E N I O F Projects above $50 million total ECOLOGY State of Wa>h ington DProjects below $50 million total Sources: NASA, USGS, ESRI,NAIP,Washington State Orthoportal, other suppliers Ecology Publication #: 14-06-033 October 2014 / revised February 2019 Ecology FY 2015-17 Proposed Floodplain by Design Project List Rank Project Description Grant Local Project Legis Request Match Total Dist. Yakima FP Management Program: Rambler's Park Phase IV and Trout 1 Meadows Phase II (Yakima County) $2,358,000 $592,000 $2,950,000 15 Puyallup Watershed Floodplain 2 Reconnections - Tier 1 (Pierce County) $10,240,000 $2,544,250 $12,784,250 31 Lower Dungeness River Floodplain 3 Restoration (Clallam County) $9,501,600 $2,375,400 $11,877,000 24 Boeing Levee/Russell Road Improvements & Floodplain Restoration 4 (King County Flood & Control District) $4,900,000 $24,400,000 $29,300,000 33 South Fork Nooksack - Flood, Fish and Farm Conservation (Whatcom Land 5 Trust) $3,216,958 $811,090 $4,028,048 42 Middle Green River/Porter Gateway Protection and Restoration (King 6 County) $3,648,926 $1,737,373 $5,386,299 31 Cedar River Corridor Plan 7 Implementation (King County) $5,000,000 $3,000,000 $8,000,000 5 Sustainable Management of the Upper Quinault River Floodplain (Quinault 8 Indian Nation) $560,000 $140,000 $700,000
    [Show full text]