DOCSLIB.ORG

Stable and Semi-Stable Particles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stable and Semi-Stable Particles STABLE AND SEMI-STABLE PARTICLES The Positron: Particles and Antiparticles Until 1932 the only elementary particles known in physics were the proton, the electron and the photon which we called stable particles. In that year two new elementary particles were discovered, viz. the neutron and the positron. The existence of a positron had been predicted by Dirac in 1930 in his relativistic theory of the free electron. Dirac set up the relativistic wave equation for the electron and showed that solutions were possible for all values of the total energy Et whenever where m is the actual mass of the moving electron and c is the velocity of light. According to the Dirac theory there exists a set of mathematically possible positive energy states with energies greater than mc2 and also a set of possible negative energy states with energies less than - mc2. the following simple argument may help the reader. The relativistic equation connecting the momentum and total energy of a moving particle is where mo is the rest mass of the moving particle and p is its momentum. Thus and for any given value of the momentum p the energy Et can be positive or negative. In the case of the electron there are therefore positive energy states corresponding to observable energies, but the negative energy states have no simple physical meaning and can only be interpreted mathematically. Since electrons in the positive states would make radiative transitions to the negative states, and since this is not observed, Dirac proposed that all the negative energy states in a perfect vacuum were completely occupied by electrons, whereas all the positive states were normally empty. The negative states are therefore completely filled and are unobservable until a vacancy occurs in one of them by the removal of an electron to a positive, observable, energy state by the interaction of the electron with the electromagnetic field. This leaves a positively charged hole or vacancy which is manifest as a particle with the same mass as its companion electron but with opposite charge and spin (conservation 9 of angular momentum). The energy required for this upward transition will be, since two particles are created, which means that a positron-electron pair cannot be created by bombarding particles or photons of less than the threshold energy of 1·02 MeV, see Fig. 26.5. Negative·· electron O observable Energy E / E•mc2 i I AE•2 mc2 )0 }E=-mc2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Electrons 0 0 0 0 0 0 (. ) 'J 0 0 0 of negative mass 0 0 0 0 0 0 l.J .) � 0 0 unobservable 0 0 0 0 (_) 0 0 (.,21 0 0 0 l J to Continuous -: distribution + Vacancy a positron extends to Infinity Fig. 26.5 Creation of a positron-electron pair. according to Dirac. The above is a simplified description of the formation of a positron-electron pair. In free flight most positrons are slowed down to low energies before annihilation and many of these are then captured by electrons to give so-called positronium atoms. A positronium atom is a short-lived positron-electron pair. The relativistic equation for E, holds for all free particles of spin fh/21t, so that all such particles have 'antiparticles'. When a.particle and its antiparticle meet, great energy is created by their mutual annihilation. As we have seen, the positron-electron pair requires about 1 Me V for its creation so that we can expect the creation of a proton-antiproton pair to require at least 1836 x 1 MeV, i.e. an energy of nearly 2 Ge V relative to the centre of the mass of the pair. Calculation shows that the initial kinetic energy of the bombarding proton in a proton• proton collision producing an antiproton by p" +p+ -+(p+ +p+)+(p+ +p+) is 6mPc2 = 5·6 GeV, when allowance is made for conservation laws and relativistic effects at these high energies. 10 Particles and antiparticles have opposite charges but always have the same mass. They interact strongly in pairs where they create great energy from the annihilation of particle matter. The existence of the antiproton and the antineutron as well as the positron gives strong support to the Dirac theory of free particles. Fig. 26.7 Emulsion photograph showing annihilation of anti proton. The antiproton enters from the top left-hand corner and is annihilated at the end of its range. The annihilation energy is then distributed among the secondary charged particles of which four pions and two protons are shown. (From Powell, ibid.) 11 Pions, Muons and Kaons We have mentioned that primary cosmic rays consist largely of protons. When such fast protons encounter the nuclei of atoms in the atmosphere, high-energy nucleon-nucleon collisions take place which cannot easily be reproduced in the laboratory. It is not surprising, then, that many new particles were discovered in cosmic ray events, particles with very strange properties compared with the early elementary particles known to physicists (stable particles). As we have said the first new particle to be found was the positron, soon to be followed by the -meson, which has a mass lying between that of the electron and the proton. Many other mesons have since been discovered, and now we know that when a fast cosmic ray proton strikes a nucleus it reacts strongly with the nucleons and in the ensuing rearrangement a shower of many mesons can be ejected. The discovery of the first meson as an elementary particle was made in 1937 by Neddermeyer, Anderson, Street, and Stevenson in Wilson cloud chamber cosmic ray observations. This particle was then called a mesotron and could be either positive or negative. We now call this particle the -meson or muon. Its mass was estimated to be about three hundred times the mass of the electron. The existence of a particle with these peculiar characteristics had been predicted by Yukawa in 1935. Yukawa put a theory of nuclear attraction forces which required the existence of a particle, with either positive or negative charge, and of mass equivalent to two or three hundred electronic masses, to give the correct distance over which the short range forces act, viz. about 1 fm. These mesons of Yukawa are the quanta of the nuclear force-field and it was natural to identify the 1937 experimental meson with Yukawa's nuclear photon. This was then interpreted as the strong force-carrier within the nucleus, shuttling backward and forwards among the nucleons and so binding them together. One of the properties of the negative meson, as predicted by the theory, was that when stopped by ordinary solid materials it should be absorbed very rapidly, showing strong nuclear interaction, but in time it was found that -mesons have only a weak interaction with nuclei, a result incompatible with Yukawa's requirements. Experimentally it was found that fast -mesons could pass through thick plates of lead without being absorbed, showing their weak interactions with nuclei of solid substances. Hence the possibility of identifying the experimental • meson with Yukawa's particle was open to doubt, and when in 1947 the first nuclear emulsion plates exposed to cosmic rays at high altitudes were examined by C. F. Powell and his team at Bristol, and the existence of another meson of mass about 300 me was suspected, this doubt was strengthened, since the Yukawa theory did not postulate two different mesons. In the early nuclear emulsion plates some of the mesons were 12 found to decay at the end of their range. These were later identified as positive -mesons which decay when stopped in the emulsion to secondary mesons. The new -mesons were also shown to be produced in disintegration processes and it was found that they reacted very strongly with the nucleons of the emulsion nuclei. I I I I I _..,._ Fig. 26.2 First observation of a-meson decay in a nuclear emulsion. The pion enters the plate at the bottom left-hand corner and reaches the end of its range at the top. A secondary µ-meson is ejected nearly backwards along the line of approach of the pion. Note the increase of grain density of these particles at the end of their respective ranges: (From PowcH, ibid.) We have mentioned that -mesons (pions), which have mass about 273 me, are created when primary cosmic ray protons collide with atmospheric nuclei and cause energetic nuclear disintegrations. Pions are radioactive and have a very short lifetime T: They can exist in all three states: n ", with T= 25 ns 1t , with T-25 ns n°, with T'=O·l fs. 13 These lifetimes, which refer only to mesons at rest, are so short, that only a fraction of cosmic ray pions can reach sea-level. They are attenuated in the atmosphere because of the strong nuclear interaction. The charged pions decay to muons and neutrinos as follows: n+ --.µ+ +v+33 MeV n---.µ-+v+33 MeV. The charged muons are also unstable, emitting electrons: µ±--.e± +2v+ 105 MeV. The radioactive decay of -mesons can be followed easily in the nuclear emulsion plate. The above equations are of great importance. Since the muon decays from rest, the conservation of linear momentum requires that two particles must be ejected. The only particle observed is the electron with its continuous energy spectrum. Since the charge is conserved, one expects the second particle to be a neutrino. However, since the spin of the muon is ½ and the sum of the electron and neutrino spins can only be 0 or 1, but never! The conservation of angular momentum requires another particle of opposite spin 1/2 to be ejected at the same time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding the Ultimate Structure of Matters and Some Scientific Doubts of Nature Through Simple Hypotheses
    IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP) e-ISSN: 2278-4861.Volume 9, Issue 2 Ver. I (Mar. – Apr. 2017), PP 64-68 www.iosrjournals.org Understanding the Ultimate Structure of Matters and Some Scientific Doubts of Nature through Simple Hypotheses Bao-Yu Zong (Temasek Laboratories, National University of Singapore, Singapore) Abstract: There are numerous unanswered scientific doubts/phenomena in Nature which still perplex scientific researchers currently. To solve these puzzles, unveiling the ultimate structure of matters, which make up the Nature world, is essential. Here four hypotheses, namely the fundamental matter component (basic particle) and its property, construction process of the basic particles into other particles/matters, repulsion of particles of the same type, and direct relationship between matter and energy, are proposed. These simple hypotheses can well explain some natural phenomena, such as the existence of huge atom energy and various particles/matters of different properties, and conversion balance between matters and energy. Due to the existence of diverse infinite fine particles and repulsion of particles of the same types, matters and the Nature world are submerged in a sea of particles and there is not a real vacuum space (without any particle) in the Nature world. This in turn reveals Thermal Laws, the component of dark energy/matter, as well as a minimum temperature of ~3K that exists in the deep Universe. The suggested relationships between particles and/or matters also shed light on the mechanisms of interaction forces of same or different polarity particles, and intermedia of gravitational, electrical and magnetic fields. Keywords: Basic particle, elementary particle, dark energy/matter, smallest transporter of energy, fundamental component of matter I.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction Study of the S Particle Dark Matter Candidate at ALICE
    Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Heidelberg Reconstruction study of the S particle dark matter candidate at ALICE Master Thesis in Physics submitted by Fabio Leonardo Schlichtmann born in Heilbronn (Germany) March 2021 Abstract: This thesis deals with the sexaquark S, a proposed particle with uuddss quark content which might be strongly bound and is considered to be a reasonable dark matter can- didate. The S is supposed to be produced in Pb-Pb nuclear collisions and could interact with detector material, resulting in characteristic final states. A suitable way to observe final states is using the ALICE experiment which is capable of detecting charged and neutral particles and doing particle identification (PID). In this thesis the full reconstruction chain for the S particle is described, in particular the purity of particle identification for various kinds of particle species is studied in dependence of topological restrictions. Moreover, nuclear interactions in the detector material are considered with regard to their spatial distribution. Conceivable reactions channels of the S are discussed, a phase space simulation is done and the order of magnitude of possibly detectable S candidates is estimated. With regard to the reaction channels, various PID and topology cuts were defined and varied in order to find an S candidate. In total 2:17 · 108 Pb-Pb events from two different beam times were analyzed. The resulting S particle candidates were studied with regard to PID and methods of background estimation were applied. In conclusion we found in the channel S + p ! ¯p+ K+ + K0 + π+ a signal with a significance of up to 2.8, depending on the cuts, while no sizable signal was found in the other studied channels.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Mass Ratios Nearly Equaling Geometric Ratios, More Examples
    x Particle Mass Ratios nearly equaling Geometric Ratios, more examples Carl Littmann 25 Washington Lane #313, Wyncote PA 19095 USA [email protected] April 2021 Abstract There are many important Particle Mass ratios in Physics, such as the 'Proton to electron' mass ratio, about 1836.15 to 1. And there are many major Volumetric ratios in 'Solid Geometry', some of which we may have seen in high school. And, remarkably, some of the major particle Mass ratios nearly equal some of those major geometric Volumetric ratios! This article gives many additional examples of these matches, which couldn't be included in my earlier article - which preferably should be read first. Ref. https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-Quantum%20Theory%20/%20Particle%20Physics/Download/6726 (But even both articles don't give all the important examples -- to prevent unwieldy length.) Keywords: Particle mass ratios, Geometric volume ratios, 1836.15 to 1, Proton to electron mass ratio Introduction As implied by the above Abstract, the goal of this article is to find out why the different Particles in physics have the different masses they do! And that was the goal of many Nobel Laureates. But that goal illuded them. But this article largely succeeds. In many cases, we have importantly discovered that a major particle mass ratio, existing in Nature, nearly equals a volume ratio in a basic, symmetrical sphere pattern. In many cases, we have also found that the Average of two different major volumetric ratios nearly equals a major particle mass ratio. Or simply averaging the masses of two different particles together -- nearly equals the mass of a third particle! Quite remarkable, and unlikely to be just 'chance'.
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University Press
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-40426-7 - The Standard Model: A Primer C. P. Burgess and Guy D. Moore Index More information Index 2π counting, 156 Anomalous magnetic moment of a proton, 322 1 ∆I = 2 Rule, 356 Anomaly matching, 365 ∆ baryon, 302 Anti-fundamental representation, 491 Λ baryon, 302 Antiparticles, 14 Ω baryon, 302 Antisymmetry of the baryonic wave function, Σ baryon, 302 301 Σ∗ baryon, 302 Asymmetries, left-right, 199 Θ3, and electric dipole moments, 464 Asymmetry, forward-backward, 200 Ξ baryon, 302 Asymptotic freedom, 454 Ξ gauges, 506 Atmospheric neutrino oscillations, 402 Ξ∗ baryon, 302 Axioms of field theory, 7 γ5, convention for, 518 Axion, 459 ΛQCD, 278 Axion potential, 467 ρ parameter, 236 Axions, as cold dark matter, 468 SUc(3) SUL(2) UY (1), 54 × × B-L conservation, 104 A terms, Supersymmetry breaking, 450 B-L symmetry, gauged, 108 Abelian Higgs model, 41 BaBar experiment, 229 Accidental conservation laws, in the standard Barn, 197 model, 96 Baryon masses, 300 Accidental symmetries, 239, 241 Baryon masses, and chiral symmetry breaking, Accidental symmetries, and the Fermi theory, 316 241 Baryon number, 96, 286 Accidental symmetry, 68 Baryon number, anomalies, 102 Action, 12 Baryon number, of QCD bound states, 287 Ademollo-Gatto theorem, 324, 361 Baryons, 71, 281 Adjoint Higgs models, 107 Baryons, and flavor symmetry, 300 Adjoint representation, 490 Baryons, defined, 281 Altarelli-Parisi (DGLAP) equations, 347 Baryons, octet and decuplet, 302 Angular momentum operators, 497 Baryons, valence quark content of, 302
    [Show full text]
  • Meson and Baryon Spectrum for QCD with Two Light Dynamical Quarks
    Meson and baryon spectrum for QCD with two light dynamical quarks Georg P. Engel1, C. B. Lang1, Markus Limmer1, Daniel Mohler1,2, and Andreas Sch¨afer3 (BGR [Bern-Graz-Regensburg] Collaboration) 1Institut f¨ur Physik, FB Theoretische Physik, Universit¨at Graz, A–8010 Graz, Austria 2TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall Vancouver, BC V6T 2A3, Canada 3Institut f¨ur Theoretische Physik, Universit¨at Regensburg, D–93040 Regensburg, Germany (Dated: November 4, 2018) We present results of meson and baryon spectroscopy using the Chirally Improved Dirac operator on lattices of size 163 × 32 with two mass-degenerate light sea quarks. Three ensembles with pion masses of 322(5), 470(4) and 525(7) MeV and lattice spacings close to 0.15 fm are investigated. Results for ground and excited states for several channels are given, including spin two mesons and hadrons with strange valence quarks. The analysis of the states is done with the variational method, including two kinds of Gaussian sources and derivative sources. We obtain several ground states fairly precisely and find radial excitations in various channels. Excited baryon results seem to suffer from finite size effects, in particular at small pion masses. We discuss the possible appearance of scattering states, considering masses and eigenvectors. Partially quenched results in the scalar channel suggest the presence of a 2-particle state, however, in most channels we cannot identify them. Where available, we compare our results to results of quenched simulations using the same action. PACS numbers: 11.15.Ha, 12.38.Gc I. INTRODUCTION fermions are very expensive, typically two orders of mag- nitude more expensive than simulations with the simple, The overwhelming majority of hadronic states in the improved Wilson Dirac operator.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Xic0 Analysis Using Semileptonic Decay Channel in P+
    Status of Xic0 analysis using semileptonic decay channel in p+Pb collisions Nov 16th 2019 Jeongsu Bok (Inha University) Motivation • Heavy quarks are • sensitive probes to study the Quark-Gluon Plasma in heavy-ion coll isions. • Due to their large masses, they are formed in initial hard scattering of parton before the timescale of QGP formation • àproduced early in the collision, live long enough to sample QGP • experience the whole system evolution • Baryon containing Heavy Quark • Charm-baryon measurements provide unique insight into hadroniz ation processes • Baryon-to-Meson ratio is expected to be higher in p+Pb and Pb+Pb 11/16/19 2 Charmed baryon-to-meson ratio • Charmed baryon-to-meson ratio in p+p and p+Pb higher tha n than model calculations 11/16/19 3 0 0 �c / D • Phys. Lett. B. 781 (2018) 8–19 • Theories underestimate it 11/16/19 4 Charmed baryon-to-meson ratio in Pb+Pb • Enhancement in Pb+Pb • Compatible with models that include recombination 11/16/19 5 Charmed baryon-to-meson ratio in terms of multiplicity • Increase from low to high multiplicity • ratio in high multiplicity in pp comparable Pb-Pb • àrecombination already saturated in p+p? 11/16/19 6 0 + �c (�c ) • Charm hadronization not fully understood • à we need more result with different channel such as �c • Possibility to be hadronized via coalescence in QGP? • Strange enhancement? • Multiplicity dependence? 11/16/19 7 0 Studying �c using semi-leptonic decay • Analysis procedure • Reconstruct �- Hadronic decay channel: 0 • Reconstruct electron �c à π+ Ξ- → π+ π- Λ →
    [Show full text]
  • Preprint DTP/90/82 Etc
    ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** ** ** ** June 1991 ** ** ** ** A Manual to ** ** ** ** The Lund Monte Carlo for Hadronic Processes ** ** ** ** PYTHIA version 5.5 ** ** ** ** Hans-Uno Bengtsson ** ** Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Uppsala ** ** ** ** Torbjorn Sjostrand ** ** CERN/TH, CH-1211 Geneva 23 ** ** BITNET/EARN address TORSJO@CERNVM ** ** Tel. +22 - 767 28 20 ** ** ** ** Copyright Hans-Uno Bengtsson and Torbjorn Sjostrand ** ** ** ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** * * * Table of Contents * * * * 1. Introductory Material * * 1.1. Program Objective * * 1.2. Update History * * 1.3. Major Changes from PYTHIA 4.8 to 5.3 * * 1.4. Major Changes from PYTHIA 5.3 to 5.4 * * 1.5. Major Changes from PYTHIA 5.4 to 5.5 * * 1.6. Installation of Program * * 1.7. Programming Philosophy * * * * 2. The Program Components * * 2.1. The Main Subroutines * * 2.2. The Physics Processes * * 2.3. Comments on Physics Processes * * 2.4. Switches for Event Type and Kinematics Selection * * 2.5. The General Switches and Parameters * * 2.6. General Event Information * * 2.7. The Event Record * * 2.8. Other Routines and Commonblocks * * 2.9. The JETSET Routines * * 2.10. On Cross-Sections * * 2.11. Examples * * * * Acknowledgements * * References * * * ********************************************************************** * Legend:
    [Show full text]
  • Masses of the Five New Narrow States of Neutral Charmed Omega Baryon Calculated Within the Atom-Like Structure of Baryons
    Copyright © 2017 by Sylwester Kornowski All rights reserved Masses of the Five New Narrow States of Neutral Charmed Omega Baryon Calculated Within the Atom-Like Structure of Baryons Sylwester Kornowski Abstract: The phase transitions of the inflation field, which are described within the Scale- Symmetric Theory (SST), lead to the atom-like structure of baryons. Here, within such a model, we calculated mass of the charged charmed Xi baryon (2467.89 MeV) and mass of neutral one (2468.51 MeV). We calculated also mass of ground state of the neutral charmed Omega baryon (2949.02 MeV) - it is below the threshold mass (2961.61 MeV) for the decay to charged charmed Xi (2467.93) and charged kaon (493.68 MeV), and we calculated masses of the five new narrow states of the neutral charmed Omega baryon with a mass of 2949.02 MeV: 3000 MeV (it is the ground state above the threshold mass), 3051 MeV, 3067 MeV, 3084 MeV, and 3118 MeV. We showed as well that there should be a structure around 3186 MeV. Within presented here model, we calculated mass of the charm quark (1276.4 MeV). 1. Introduction Recently, the LHCb collaboration have reported the discovery of the five new narrow states o of neutral charmed Omega baryons Ω*c [1]. Here, applying the Scale-Symmetric Theory (SST), we showed the origin of such resonances and we calculated mass of the charm quark. Table 1 Masses of neutral loops, mS(o), and relativistic masses of neutral pion, mW(o), in d states in baryons [2] d mS(o) mW(o) [MeV] [MeV] 1 421.494 208.643 2 297.151 175.709 4 186.886 156.668 The phase transitions of the inflation/Higgs field, which are described within SST, lead to the atom-like structure of baryons [2].
    [Show full text]
  • LA-UR-13-22934 Approved for Public Release; Distribution Is Unlimited
    LA-UR-13-22934 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Title: Initial MCNP6 Release Overview - MCNP6 version 1.0 Author(s): Goorley, John T.; James, Michael R.; Booth, Thomas E.; Brown, Forrest B.; Bull, Jeffrey S.; Cox, Lawrence J.; Durkee, Joe W. Jr.; Elson, Jay S.; Fensin, Michael Lorne; Forster, Robert A. III; Hendricks, John S.; Hughes, H. Grady III; Johns, Russell C.; Kiedrowski, Brian C.; Martz, Roger L.; Mashnik, Stepan G.; McKinney, Gregg W.; Pelowitz, Denise B.; Prael, Richard E.; Sweezy, Jeremy Ed; Waters, Laurie S.; Wilcox, Trevor; Zukaitis, Anthony J. Intended for: For distribution with MCNP6 code and executables, but also for upload to MCNP website. Report Issued: 2013-04-24 (Draft) Disclaimer: Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer,is operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the National NuclearSecurity Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC52-06NA25396. By approving this article, the publisher recognizes that the U.S. Government retains nonexclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or to allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. Los Alamos National Laboratory requests that the publisher identify this article as work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Departmentof Energy. Los Alamos National Laboratory strongly supports academic freedom and a researcher's right to publish; as an institution, however, the Laboratory does not endorse the viewpoint of a publication or guarantee its technical correctness. LA-UR 13-22934 INITIAL MCNP6 RELEASE OVERVIEW – MCNP6 VERSION 1.0 T.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of Secondary Cosmic Rays Lithium, Beryllium, and Boron
    Measurement of Secondary Cosmic Rays Lithium, Beryllium, and Boron by the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer by Yi Jia B.S., Xi’an Jiaotong University, China (2016) Submitted to the Department of Physics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 2018 c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2018. All rights reserved. ○ Author................................................................ Department of Physics August 8th, 2018 Certified by. Samuel C. C. Ting Thomas Dudley Cabot Professor of Physics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Nergis Mavalvala Associate Department Head, Physics 2 Measurement of Secondary Cosmic Rays Lithium, Beryllium, and Boron by the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer by Yi Jia Submitted to the Department of Physics on August 8th, 2018, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract Secondary cosmic rays are mainly produced by the collisions of nuclei with the in- terstellar medium. The precise knowledge of secondary cosmic rays is important to understand the origin and propagation of cosmic rays in the Galaxy. In this thesis, my work on the precision measurement of secondary cosmic rays Li, Be, and B in the rigidity (momentum/charge) range 1.9 GV to 3.3 TV with a total of 5.4 million nuclei collected by AMS is presented. The total error on each of the fluxes is 3%-4% at 100 GV, which is an improvement of more than a factor of 10 compared to previ- ous measurements. Unexpectedly, the results show above 30 GV, these three fluxes have identical rigidity dependence and harden identically above 200 GV.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2004.04551V1 [Hep-Th] 9 Apr 2020 and Resonances
    Nucleons and higher spin baryon resonances: an AdS/QCD configurational entropic incursion Luiz F. Ferreira1, 2, ∗ and Roldao da Rocha1, y 1Federal University of ABC, Center of Mathematics, Santo Andr´e,Brazil 2Federal University of ABC, Center of Physics, Santo Andr´e,Brazil. P 1 + Families of J = 2 nucleons (N(939), N(1440), N(1710), N(1880), N(2100), N(2300)) and P 3 − J = 2 nucleons (N(1520), N(1700), N(1875) and N(2120)) are scrutinized from the point of view of the configurational entropy (CE). The mass spectra of higher J P resonances in each one of these families are then obtained when configurational-entropic Regge trajectories, that relate the CE of nucleon families to both their J P spin and also to their experimental mass spectra, are interpolated. The mass spectra of the next generation of nucleon resonances are then compared to al- ready established baryonic states in PDG. Besides the zero temperature case, the finite temperature analysis is also implemented. I. INTRODUCTION stance, the hard wall model consists in introducing an infra-red (IR) cut-off corresponding to the confinement The configurational entropy (CE) represents a mea- scale [7]. On the other hand, in the case of the soft wall sure of spatial correlations, in the very same sense of the model is included a dilaton field acting as a smooth IR pioneering Shannon's information entropy. The funda- cut-off. mental interpretation of the CE consists of the limit to In both these regimes, the CE provides new procedures a lossless compression rate of information that is inher- to figure out and unravel distinct physical phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Nucleons and Higher Spin Baryon Resonances: an Ads/QCD Configurational Entropic Incursion
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 101, 106002 (2020) Nucleons and higher spin baryon resonances: An AdS/QCD configurational entropic incursion † Luiz F. Ferreira1,2,* and Roldao da Rocha 1, 1Federal University of ABC, Center of Mathematics, 09580-210 Santo Andr´e, Brazil 2Federal University of ABC, Center of Physics, 09580-210 Santo Andr´e, Brazil (Received 10 April 2020; accepted 22 April 2020; published 1 May 2020) P 1þ P 3− Families of J ¼ 2 nucleons (Nð939Þ, Nð1440Þ, Nð1710Þ, Nð1880Þ, Nð2100Þ, Nð2300Þ) and J ¼ 2 nucleons (Nð1520Þ, Nð1700Þ, Nð1875Þ, and Nð2120Þ) are scrutinized from the point of view of the configurational entropy (CE). The mass spectra of higher JP resonances in each one of these families are then obtained when configurational-entropic Regge trajectories, that relate the CE of nucleon families to both their JP spin and also to their experimental mass spectra, are interpolated. The mass spectra of the next generation of nucleon resonances are then compared to already established baryonic states in particle data group (PDG). Besides the zero temperature case, the finite temperature analysis is also implemented. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.106002 I. INTRODUCTION In what concerns quantum chromodynamics (QCD) as a The configurational entropy (CE) represents a measure reliable description of gluons and quarks (and their inter- of spatial correlations, in the very same sense of the actions), and other elementary particles as well, their pioneering Shannon’s information entropy. The fundamen- intrinsic dynamical features make a difficult task of great tal interpretation of the CE consists of the limit to a lossless complexity to investigate hadronic nuclear states and compression rate of information that is inherent to any resonances.
    [Show full text]