MOTHS of WESTERN NORTH AMERICA UCPB004-3960G-FM Pi-Xiv.Qxd 30/1/09 7:24 Am Page Ii UCPB004-3960G-FM Pi-Xiv.Qxd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MOTHS of WESTERN NORTH AMERICA UCPB004-3960G-FM Pi-Xiv.Qxd 30/1/09 7:24 Am Page Ii UCPB004-3960G-FM Pi-Xiv.Qxd UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd 30/1/09 7:24 am Page i UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd MOTHS OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd 30/1/09 7:24 am Page ii UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd This page intentionally left blank UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd 30/1/09 7:24 am Page iii UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd Moths of Western North America JERRY A. POWELL PAUL A. OPLER UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley Los Angeles London UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd 1/30/09 9:03 PM Page iv Aptara University of California Press, one of the most distinguished univer- Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data sity presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural Powell, Jerry A. sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and Moths of western North America / Jerry A. Powell, Paul A. Opler. by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For p. cm. more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-520-25197-7 (case : alk. paper) 1. Moths—West (U.S.) University of California Press 2. Moths—Northwest, Canadian. I. Opler, Paul A. II. Title. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California QL548.P69 2009 595.780970—dc22 University of California Press, Ltd. 2008048605 London, England Manufactured in China. © 2009 by The Regents of the University of California 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 10987654321 Photo/image credits: T. Arcand: 61.25–61.27, 61.31, 61.34, 62.10, 62.20, 62.23, 62.24, 63.12, 63.31, 63.36, 64.1, 64.24–64.26, 64.29. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements E. Buckner-Opler: 63.3, 63.5, 63.21, 63.28–63.30. California Depart- of ANSI/NISO Z 39.48-1992 (R 1997)(Permanence of Paper). ment of Food & Agriculture: 61.6. Canadian National Collection (CNC): 61.28, 61.32, 62.13, 62.25, 62.32, 63.19, 63.20, 63.26, 63.27, 63.33, 63.35, 64.3–64.6, 64.9, 64.13, 64.20–64.23, 64.27, 64.28, Cover: Arctia caja (Linnaeus), California, Sierra Co., San Francisco 64.32–64.34. R. Coville: Last page color section, 59.35, 60.4, 60.5, State U., Sierra Nevada Field Campus, July 2007. Species is also shown 60.7, 60.17, 60.21–60.24, 60.27, 61.2. H. V. Daly: 60.1. L. Dyer: 61.7. in plate 47.8, which is from Elko Co., Nevada. The Sierra Nevada D. C. Ferguson: 61.11, 61.29, 61.30, 61.33, 61.36, 62.2, 62.3, population moths differ in color and pattern from the Rocky Moun- 62.5–62.8, 62.11, 62.14, 62.16, 62.26, 62.27, 62.32, 62.34, 64.7, 64.8, tain and Basin Ranges form. Photograph by Rollin Coville. 64.12, 64.14–64.16. C. Hansen: 61.13. P. G. Johnson II: First page color section, 59.2, 60.6, 60.9, 60.19, 60.30, 62.34, 63.22–63.25. N. McFarland: 61.9. L. Minor-Penland: 61.13. P. A. Opler: 61.23, 63.8, 63.9, 64.10, 64.11. S. Passoa: 64.19. D. J. Powell: 59.25, 59.33, 60.10, 60.15, 61.4, 61.5, 61.14, 61.15–61.22. J. A. Powell: 59.3, 59.4–59.22, 59.26–59.32, 59.34, 59.36, 60.2, 60.3, 60.8, 60.11–60.16, 60.18, 60.20, 60.25, 60.26, 60.28, 60.29, 60.31–60.36, 61.1, 61.3, 61.24, 62.33, 63.2, 64.17, 64.18, 64.35. E. S. Ross 59.23. B. Scaccia 61.35, 62.1, 62.4, 62.9, 62.12, 62.15, 62.17–62.19, 62.21, 62.22. D. L. Wagner 59.1, 61.8, 61.10. B. Walsh 62.28–62.31, 62.35, 62.36, 63.1, 63.4, 63.6, 63.7, 63.10, 63.11, 63.13–63.18, 64.2, 64.36. UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd 3/10/09 1:33 AM Page v Aptara CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES / vii PART ONE Apoditrysia / 115 PREFACE / ix Introduction to Lepidoptera Nonobtectomeran Superfamilies / 115 ABOUT THIS BOOK / xi and Moths Superfamily Schrecken- steinioidea / 115 Superfamily Epermenioidea / 116 Morphology / 3 Superfamily Alucitoidea / 116 Biology / 13 Superfamily Pterophoroidea / 117 Significance in Natural Superfamily Choreutoidea / 121 and Human Communities / 17 Superfamily Sesioidea / 123 Fossil Record and Evolution / 19 Superfamily Cossoidea / 126 A History of Moth Collectors Superfamily Tortricoidea / 128 in Western North America / 23 Superfamily Zygaenoidea / 160 Marc E. Epstein and James K. Adams Unspecialized Obtectomera / 165 PART TWO Superfamily Copro- Classification and Natural History morphoidea / 166 of the Moths of Western North Superfamily Thyridoidea / 167 America Obtectomera / 167 Superfamily Pyraloidea / 167 Macrolepidoptera / 201 Primitive Lineages / 33 Superfamily Drepanoidea / 201 Zeugloptera Clade / 33 Superfamily Geometroidea / 203 Superfamily Micropterigoidea / 33 Superfamily Mimallonoidea / 232 Glossata, Homoneura Clade / 34 Superfamily Lasiocampoidea / 232 Superfamily Eriocranioidea / 34 Superfamily Bombycoidea / 236 Exoporia Clade / 35 Superfamily Noctuoidea / 247 Superfamily Hepialoidea Clade / 36 Heteroneura, Monotrysia Clade / 37 SUGGESTIONS FOR COLLECTING Superfamily Nepticuloidea / 37 AND OBSERVING MOTHS / 321 Superfamily Incurvarioidea / 38 GLOSSARY / 329 / 44 Superfamily Tischerioidea INSECT INDEX / 333 Ditrysia, Nonapoditrysian PLANT INDEX / 357 Superfamilies / 47 GENERAL INDEX / 367 Superfamily Tineoidea / 47 Superfamily Gracillarioidea / 53 Superfamily Gelechioidea / 59 Color Plates / between pages 114 Superfamily Gelechioidea, and 115 Oecophorid Lineage / 60 Superfamily Gelechioidea, Elachistid Lineage / 64 Superfamily Yponomeutoidea / 104 v UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd 30/1/09 7:24 am Page vi UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd This page intentionally left blank UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd 30/1/09 7:24 am Page vii UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Map of North America Figure 64. Habitus drawing of flightless female Ethmia charybdis Figure 2. Schematic representation of the exoskeletal anatomy Powell (Ethmiidae), a winter moth. of a ditrysian moth, with prothoracic leg enlarged below. Figures 65–73. Genitalia structure of exemplar species of Gele- Figure 3. Descaled lepidopteran head, frontal aspect. chioidea, ventral aspect: Elachistidae, Coleophoridae, Mom- Figures 4–9. Wing venation: exemplar species of ancestral line- phidae. ages of Lepidoptera. Figures 74–86. Genitalia structure of exemplar species of Gele- Figures 10–17. Wing venation: exemplars of ditrysian moths. chioidea, aedeagus in situ: Scythrididae, Cosmopterigidae. Figure 18. Male genitalia of a ditrysian moth (Tortricidae), ven- Figure 87. Habitus drawing of female Areniscythris brachypteris tral aspect with valvae reflexed. Powell (Scythrididae). Figure 19. Female genitalia of a ditrysian moth (Tortricidae), ven- Figures 88–100. Genitalia structure of exemplar species of Gelechi- tral aspect; broken lines represent segments of abdominal pelt. idae, venterolateral or ventral or aspect, except as noted. Figure 20. Body forms of moth larvae. Figures 101–112. Genitalia structure of exemplar species of Figure 21. Schematic representation of the head capsule of a lar- Gelechiidae, Douglasiidae, and Yponomeutoidea; males ven- val ditrysian moth, frontal aspect. tral or venterolateral aspect, females ventral aspect: Plutellidae, Figure 22. Chaetotaxy (setal map) of a larval ditrysian moth (Tor- Yponomeutidae, Argyresthiidae, Douglasiidae. tricidae). Figures 113–122. Genitalia of Yponomeutoidea and Sesiidae, Figure 23. Abdominal proleg crochet patterns. ventral aspect; aedeagus removed and shown to right Figure 24. Pupae of ditrysian moths, ventral aspect. (except as noted): Acrolepiidae, Heliodinidae, Bedelliidae, Figure 25. Two-dimensional portrayal of phylogenetic relation- Sesiidae. ships of extant lepidopteran superfamilies, based on parsi- Figure 123. Habitus drawing of Lithariapteryx elegans Powell, a di- mony analysis. urnal heliodinid that is endemic to the Monterey Bay and San Figure 26. Phylogenetic hypothesis of major lepidopteran line- Luis Obispo coastal dune systems in California. ages superimposed on the geologic time scale, with fossil oc- Figures 124–133. Genitalia structure of exemplar species of currences indicated. nonobtectomeran Apoditrysia, ventral aspect (except as Figure 27. Pictorial representation of a theoretical scenario for the noted): Epermeniidae, Alucitidae, Pterophoridae, Choreutidae. origins of angiosperm-feeding that led to the radiation of lep- Figures 134–141. Genitalia structure of exemplar species of idopteran during the Cretaceous. Tortricidae, Olethreutinae, ventral aspect. Figures 28–31, 33–38. Genitalia structures of ancestral lineages. Figures 142–154. Genitalia structure of exemplar species of Figure 32. Schematic representation of hepialid female terminal Tortricidae, Tortricinae, ventral aspect. segments, saggital section. Figures 155–164. Genitalia structure of exemplar species of Figures 39–47. Genitalia structure of exemplar species of Ti- Zygaenoidea, ventral aspect (except as noted): Zygaenidae, neoidea and Gracillarioidea; Tineidae, Acrolophidae, Psychi- Limacodidae, Dalceridae, Megalopygidae. dae, Gracillariidae, Bucculatricidae. Figures 165–174. Genitalia structure of exemplar species of Cram- Figure 48. Two-dimensional portrayal of phylogenetic relation- bidae, ventral aspect (except as noted): Scopariinae, Odonti- ships in Gelechioidea. inae, Glaphyriinae, Pyraustinae. Figures 49–62. Antennal, abdominal structures, and genitalia of Figures 175–184. Genitalia structure of exemplar species of Cram- exemplar species of Gelechioidea: Blastobasidae, Oecophori- bidae, ventral aspect (except as noted): Pyraustinae, Spi- dae, Depressariidae, Stenomatidae, Ethmiidae. lomelinae, Acentropiinae (ϭNymphulinae), Crambinae. Figure 63. Heads of ethmiid moths, showing the strongly up- Figures 185–192. Genitalia structure of exemplar species of curved labial palpus that is characteristic of most Gele- Pyralidae, ventral aspect, aedeagus to right (except as noted): chioidea. Pyralinae, Chrysauginae, Epipaschiinae, Phycitinae. vii UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd 30/1/09 7:24 am Page viii UCPB004-3960G-FM_pi-xiv.qxd Figures 193–200. Genitalia structure of exemplar species of Pyral- lonoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Saturniidae, Sphin- idae, Phycitinae, ventral aspect. gidae. Figure 201. Schematic representation of Geometridae FW with Figure 230.
Recommended publications
  • DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous Invasions of Micromoths in Madagascar
    Genome DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in Madagascar Journal: Genome Manuscript ID gen-2018-0065.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 17-Jul-2018 Author: Complete List of Authors: Lopez-Vaamonde, Carlos; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), ; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte (IRBI), Sire, Lucas; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte Rasmussen,Draft Bruno; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte Rougerie, Rodolphe; Institut Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Wieser, Christian; Landesmuseum für Kärnten Ahamadi, Allaoui; University of Antananarivo, Department Entomology Minet, Joël; Institut de Systematique Evolution Biodiversite deWaard, Jeremy; Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Decaëns, Thibaud; Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS–Université de Montpellier–Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier–EPHE), , CEFE UMR 5175 CNRS Lees, David; Natural History Museum London Keyword: Africa, invasive alien species, Lepidoptera, Malaise trap, plant pests Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special 7th International Barcode of Life Issue? : https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/genome-pubs Page 1 of 57 Genome 1 DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in 2 Madagascar 3 4 5 Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde1,2, Lucas Sire2, Bruno Rasmussen2, Rodolphe Rougerie3, 6 Christian Wieser4, Allaoui Ahamadi Allaoui 5, Joël Minet3, Jeremy R. deWaard6, Thibaud 7 Decaëns7, David C. Lees8 8 9 1 INRA, UR633, Zoologie Forestière, F- 45075 Orléans, France. 10 2 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS Université de Tours, UFR 11 Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Modular Structure, Sequence Diversification and Appropriate
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Modular structure, sequence diversifcation and appropriate nomenclature of seroins produced Received: 17 July 2018 Accepted: 14 February 2019 in the silk glands of Lepidoptera Published: xx xx xxxx Lucie Kucerova1, Michal Zurovec 1,2, Barbara Kludkiewicz1, Miluse Hradilova3, Hynek Strnad3 & Frantisek Sehnal1,2 Seroins are small lepidopteran silk proteins known to possess antimicrobial activities. Several seroin paralogs and isoforms were identifed in studied lepidopteran species and their classifcation required detailed phylogenetic analysis based on complete and verifed cDNA sequences. We sequenced silk gland-specifc cDNA libraries from ten species and identifed 52 novel seroin cDNAs. The results of this targeted research, combined with data retrieved from available databases, form a dataset representing the major clades of Lepidoptera. The analysis of deduced seroin proteins distinguished three seroin classes (sn1-sn3), which are composed of modules: A (includes the signal peptide), B (rich in charged amino acids) and C (highly variable linker containing proline). The similarities within and between the classes were 31–50% and 22.5–25%, respectively. All species express one, and in exceptional cases two, genes per class, and alternative splicing further enhances seroin diversity. Seroins occur in long versions with the full set of modules (AB1C1B2C2B3) and/or in short versions that lack parts or the entire B and C modules. The classes and the modular structure of seroins probably evolved prior to the split between Trichoptera and Lepidoptera. The diversity of seroins is refected in proposed nomenclature. Te silk spun by caterpillars is a composite material based on two protein agglomerates that have been known for centuries as fbroin and sericin.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Communication in the Nocturnal Lepidoptera
    Chapter 6 Acoustic Communication in the Nocturnal Lepidoptera Michael D. Greenfield Abstract Pair formation in moths typically involves pheromones, but some pyra- loid and noctuoid species use sound in mating communication. The signals are generally ultrasound, broadcast by males, and function in courtship. Long-range advertisement songs also occur which exhibit high convergence with commu- nication in other acoustic species such as orthopterans and anurans. Tympanal hearing with sensitivity to ultrasound in the context of bat avoidance behavior is widespread in the Lepidoptera, and phylogenetic inference indicates that such perception preceded the evolution of song. This sequence suggests that male song originated via the sensory bias mechanism, but the trajectory by which ances- tral defensive behavior in females—negative responses to bat echolocation sig- nals—may have evolved toward positive responses to male song remains unclear. Analyses of various species offer some insight to this improbable transition, and to the general process by which signals may evolve via the sensory bias mechanism. 6.1 Introduction The acoustic world of Lepidoptera remained for humans largely unknown, and this for good reason: It takes place mostly in the middle- to high-ultrasound fre- quency range, well beyond our sensitivity range. Thus, the discovery and detailed study of acoustically communicating moths came about only with the use of electronic instruments sensitive to these sound frequencies. Such equipment was invented following the 1930s, and instruments that could be readily applied in the field were only available since the 1980s. But the application of such equipment M. D. Greenfield (*) Institut de recherche sur la biologie de l’insecte (IRBI), CNRS UMR 7261, Parc de Grandmont, Université François Rabelais de Tours, 37200 Tours, France e-mail: [email protected] B.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Mitogenomic Phylogeny of Lepidoptera ⇑ Martijn J.T.N
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 169–178 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Towards a mitogenomic phylogeny of Lepidoptera ⇑ Martijn J.T.N. Timmermans a,b, , David C. Lees c, Thomas J. Simonsen a a Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom b Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom c Department of Zoology, Cambridge University, Downing Street CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom article info abstract Article history: The backbone phylogeny of Lepidoptera remains unresolved, despite strenuous recent morphological and Received 13 January 2014 molecular efforts. Molecular studies have focused on nuclear protein coding genes, sometimes adding a Revised 11 May 2014 single mitochondrial gene. Recent advances in sequencing technology have, however, made acquisition of Accepted 26 May 2014 entire mitochondrial genomes both practical and economically viable. Prior phylogenetic studies utilised Available online 6 June 2014 just eight of 43 currently recognised lepidopteran superfamilies. Here, we add 23 full and six partial mitochondrial genomes (comprising 22 superfamilies of which 16 are newly represented) to those Keywords: publically available for a total of 24 superfamilies and ask whether such a sample can resolve deeper tRNA rearrangement lepidopteran phylogeny. Using recoded datasets we obtain topologies that are highly congruent with Ditrysia Illumina prior nuclear and/or morphological studies. Our study shows support for an expanded Obtectomera LR-PCR including Gelechioidea, Thyridoidea, plume moths (Alucitoidea and Pterophoroidea; possibly along with Pooled mitochondrial genome assembly Epermenioidea), Papilionoidea, Pyraloidea, Mimallonoidea and Macroheterocera.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometro
    Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, & Noctuoidea) Biodiversity Inventory of the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab Hugo L. Kons Jr. Last Update: June 2001 Abstract A systematic check list of 489 species of Lepidoptera collected in the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab is presented, including 464 species in the superfamilies Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, and Noctuoidea. Taxa recorded in Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, and Thyrididae are also included. Moth taxa were collected at ultraviolet lights, bait, introduced Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), and by netting specimens. A list of taxa recorded feeding on P. notatum is presented. Introduction The University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Laboratory (NATL) contains 40 acres of natural habitats maintained for scientific research, conservation, and teaching purposes. Habitat types present include hammock, upland pine, disturbed open field, cat tail marsh, and shallow pond. An active management plan has been developed for this area, including prescribed burning to restore the upland pine community and establishment of plots to study succession (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/natl.htm). The site is a popular collecting locality for student and scientific collections. The author has done extensive collecting and field work at NATL, and two previous reports have resulted from this work, including: a biodiversity inventory of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea & Papilionoidea) of NATL (Kons 1999), and an ecological study of Hermeuptychia hermes (F.) and Megisto cymela (Cram.) in NATL habitats (Kons 1998). Other workers have posted NATL check lists for Ichneumonidae, Sphecidae, Tettigoniidae, and Gryllidae (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/insect.htm).
    [Show full text]
  • Botanist Interior 43.1
    2011 THE MICHIGAN BOTANIST 1 EDWARD G. VOSS (1929 –2012) Anton A. Reznicek and Richard K. Rabeler University of Michigan Herbarium 3600 Varsity Drive Ann Arbor, MI 48108-2228 Edward Groesbec k Voss (Fig. 1), Professor and Curator Emeritus at the Uni - versity of Michigan Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Uni - versity of Michigan Herbarium, died on February 13, 2012 at his home in Ann Arbor, after a brief illness. He was born on February 22, 1929 in Delaware, Ohio. Ed’s abilities were clear early in his life. He attended Woodward High School in Toledo, Ohio. He received the Achievement Award as the outstanding senior in his 1946 high school class, and was later elected to the Woodward High Hall of Fame. He then graduated with a bachelor’s degree with honors from Denison University (1950); his undergraduate honors thesis, On the classifica - tion of the Hesperiidae , became a significant paper on Lepidoptera (Voss 1952). He completed his education with a master’s in Biology (1951) and a doctoral de - gree in Botany (1954), both from the University of Michigan working with Rogers McVaugh. He was awarded an honorary Doctor of Science from Denison University in 2003. In 1956, he began his long association with the University of Michigan and Michigan’s flora when he was appointed as a research associate at the Herbar - ium, beginning what was expected to be a five-year project to document the flora of Michigan. He joined the Botany faculty in 1960 as assistant professor and was promoted to associate professor (1963), and later, professor (1969).
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcoding Confirms Polyphagy in a Generalist Moth, Homona Mermerodes (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
    Molecular Ecology Notes (2007) 7, 549–557 doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01786.x BARCODINGBlackwell Publishing Ltd DNA barcoding confirms polyphagy in a generalist moth, Homona mermerodes (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) JIRI HULCR,* SCOTT E. MILLER,† GREGORY P. SETLIFF,‡ KAROLYN DARROW,† NATHANIEL D. MUELLER,§ PAUL D. N. HEBERT¶ and GEORGE D. WEIBLEN** *Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, 243 Natural Sciences Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA, †National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA, ‡Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, 1980 Folwell Avenue, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55108–1095 USA, §Saint Olaf College, 1500 Saint Olaf Avenue, Northfield, MN 55057, USA,¶Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G2W1, **Bell Museum of Natural History and Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, 220 Biological Sciences Center, 1445 Gortner Avenue, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55108–1095, USA Abstract Recent DNA barcoding of generalist insect herbivores has revealed complexes of cryptic species within named species. We evaluated the species concept for a common generalist moth occurring in New Guinea and Australia, Homona mermerodes, in light of host plant records and mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I haplotype diversity. Genetic divergence among H. mermerodes moths feeding on different host tree species was much lower than among several Homona species. Genetic divergence between haplotypes from New Guinea and Australia was also less than interspecific divergence. Whereas molecular species identification methods may reveal cryptic species in some generalist herbivores, these same methods may confirm polyphagy when identical haplotypes are reared from multiple host plant families. A lectotype for the species is designated, and a summarized bibliography and illustrations including male genitalia are provided for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera
    EN62CH15-Mitter ARI 5 November 2016 12:1 I Review in Advance first posted online V E W E on November 16, 2016. (Changes may R S still occur before final publication online and in print.) I E N C N A D V A Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera Charles Mitter,1,∗ Donald R. Davis,2 and Michael P. Cummings3 1Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742; email: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560 3Laboratory of Molecular Evolution, Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017. 62:265–83 Keywords Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017.62. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org The Annual Review of Entomology is online at Hexapoda, insect, systematics, classification, butterfly, moth, molecular ento.annualreviews.org systematics This article’s doi: Access provided by University of Maryland - College Park on 11/20/16. For personal use only. 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035125 Abstract Copyright c 2017 by Annual Reviews. Until recently, deep-level phylogeny in Lepidoptera, the largest single ra- All rights reserved diation of plant-feeding insects, was very poorly understood. Over the past ∗ Corresponding author two decades, building on a preceding era of morphological cladistic stud- ies, molecular data have yielded robust initial estimates of relationships both within and among the ∼43 superfamilies, with unsolved problems now yield- ing to much larger data sets from high-throughput sequencing. Here we summarize progress on lepidopteran phylogeny since 1975, emphasizing the superfamily level, and discuss some resulting advances in our understanding of lepidopteran evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Moths of Ohio Guide
    MOTHS OF OHIO field guide DIVISION OF WILDLIFE This booklet is produced by the ODNR Division of Wildlife as a free publication. This booklet is not for resale. Any unauthorized INTRODUCTION reproduction is prohibited. All images within this booklet are copyrighted by the Division of Wildlife and it’s contributing artists and photographers. For additional information, please call 1-800-WILDLIFE. Text by: David J. Horn Ph.D Moths are one of the most diverse and plentiful HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE groups of insects in Ohio, and the world. An es- Scientific Name timated 160,000 species have thus far been cata- Common Name Group and Family Description: Featured Species logued worldwide, and about 13,000 species have Secondary images 1 Primary Image been found in North America north of Mexico. Secondary images 2 Occurrence We do not yet have a clear picture of the total Size: when at rest number of moth species in Ohio, as new species Visual Index Ohio Distribution are still added annually, but the number of species Current Page Description: Habitat & Host Plant is certainly over 3,000. Although not as popular Credit & Copyright as butterflies, moths are far more numerous than their better known kin. There is at least twenty Compared to many groups of animals, our knowledge of moth distribution is very times the number of species of moths in Ohio as incomplete. Many areas of the state have not been thoroughly surveyed and in some there are butterflies. counties hardly any species have been documented. Accordingly, the distribution maps in this booklet have three levels of shading: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphiesmeno- Ptera: the Caddisflies and Lepidoptera
    CY501-C13[548-606].qxd 2/16/05 12:17 AM Page 548 quark11 27B:CY501:Chapters:Chapter-13: 13Amphiesmeno-Amphiesmenoptera: The ptera:Caddisflies The and Lepidoptera With very few exceptions the life histories of the orders Tri- from Old English traveling cadice men, who pinned bits of choptera (caddisflies)Caddisflies and Lepidoptera (moths and butter- cloth to their and coats to advertise their fabrics. A few species flies) are extremely different; the former have aquatic larvae, actually have terrestrial larvae, but even these are relegated to and the latter nearly always have terrestrial, plant-feeding wet leaf litter, so many defining features of the order concern caterpillars. Nonetheless, the close relationship of these two larval adaptations for an almost wholly aquatic lifestyle (Wig- orders hasLepidoptera essentially never been disputed and is supported gins, 1977, 1996). For example, larvae are apneustic (without by strong morphological (Kristensen, 1975, 1991), molecular spiracles) and respire through a thin, permeable cuticle, (Wheeler et al., 2001; Whiting, 2002), and paleontological evi- some of which have filamentous abdominal gills that are sim- dence. Synapomorphies linking these two orders include het- ple or intricately branched (Figure 13.3). Antennae and the erogametic females; a pair of glands on sternite V (found in tentorium of larvae are reduced, though functional signifi- Trichoptera and in basal moths); dense, long setae on the cance of these features is unknown. Larvae do not have pro- wing membrane (which are modified into scales in Lepi- legs on most abdominal segments, save for a pair of anal pro- doptera); forewing with the anal veins looping up to form a legs that have sclerotized hooks for anchoring the larva in its double “Y” configuration; larva with a fused hypopharynx case.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]