DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 17/Thursday, January 26, 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 17/Thursday, January 26, 2006 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Proposed Rules 4337 • After analyzing the public and FAR, how does a contractor recover DATES: The finding announced in this comments, the FAR Council withdrew amounts related to catastrophic losses, document was made on January 19, the proposed definition. In since the costs cannot be assigned based 2006. You may submit new information recommending withdrawal of the rule, on actual costs under CAS (and concerning this species for our the June 26, 2003 report of the FAR Part therefore are not allowable as actual consideration at any time. 31 Streamlining Committee noted the costs), and the costs are unallowable as ADDRESSES: The complete file for this following: self-insurance charges under FAR? finding is available for public Upon further review, the Committee 3. How does the insurance industry inspection, by appointment, during recommends that the proposed definition of use the term ‘‘catastrophic losses?’’ normal business hours at the Utah Fish catastrophic losses be deleted from the final 4. How does the insurance industry’s and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and rule. The Committee continues to believe that use of the term ‘‘catastrophic losses’’ Wildlife Service, 2369 West Orton the proposed definition is consistent with the differ from its use in CAS and FAR, if Circle, Suite 50, West Valley City, Utah intent of the promulgators of the current any? 84119. Submit new information, language, as evidenced by the March 19, 5. Have there been problems in the materials, comments, or questions 1979 Committee report underlying DAR Case implementation of CAS 416.50(b)(1) as 78–400–7. concerning this species to us at the a result of the use of the term above address. The intent of the proposed coverage was to ‘‘catastrophic?’’ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: distinguish catastrophic losses as used in the 6. Provide any examples of instances cost principle from the type of catastrophic Henry Maddux, Field Supervisor, Utah where the use of the term ‘‘catastrophic’’ loss anticipated by the illustration at CAS Fish and Wildlife Office (see has resulted in contract disputes. For 416.60(h). In that illustration, motor vehicle ADDRESSES) (telephone 801–975–3330, each example provided, include the liability losses in excess of a specified extension 124; facsimile 801–975–3331). amount were absorbed by the home office nature of the dispute and the resolution. and reallocated to all segments. In the 7. Provide any comments as to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: particular case described, the specified whether the language at CAS Background amount was too low based on loss experience 416.50(b)(1) should be revised. If the to be considered catastrophic under the recommendation is to revise the Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Endangered provisions of CAS 416. However, the language, please provide suggested Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended illustration appears to anticipate losses that revisions. (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), requires that we may be catastrophic to a particular segment make a finding on whether a petition to of a company but not necessarily catastrophic 8. Provide any comments regarding use of the term ‘‘extraordinary item’’ as list, delist, or reclassify a species in a more general sense. The Committee does presents substantial scientific or not believe the drafters of the cost principle used in Generally Accepted Accounting intended to disallow self-insurance charges Principles in lieu of the term commercial information to indicate that for the type of loss anticipated by the CAS ‘‘catastrophic insurance.’’ the petitioned action may be warranted. illustration. However, since CAS does not We are to base this finding on include a definition of catastrophic loss, [FR Doc. E6–975 Filed 1–25–06; 8:45 am] information provided in the petition defining the term in FAR could cause BILLING CODE 3110–01–P and other information that is readily confusion by the users of these regulations. available to us (e.g., in our files). To the As to the commenter’s recommendation maximum extent practicable, we are to that self-insurance charges for catastrophic DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR make this finding within 90 days of our losses should be allowable, the Committee receipt of the petition, and publish our disagrees. As was noted in the report on DAR Fish and Wildlife Service Case 78–400–7, the Government should not notice of this finding promptly in the Federal Register. allow self-insurance charges for catastrophic 50 CFR Part 17 losses, such as earthquakes, which have a Our standard for substantial scientific information within the Code of Federal very small likelihood of occurring for any Endangered and Threatened Wildlife particular contractor. Regulations (CFR) with regard to a 90- and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a day petition finding is ‘‘that amount of Key Questions for Consideration Petition To List the Mussentuchit Gilia information that would lead a as Threatened or Endangered The CAS Board is soliciting reasonable person to believe that the comments on this issue from interested AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, measure proposed in the petition may parties. In particular, the Board is Interior. be warranted’’ (50 CFR 424.14(b)). If we interested in comments related to the ACTION: Notice of 90-day petition find that substantial scientific following questions: finding. information was presented, we are 1. Do contractors and contracting required to commence a review of the agencies currently interpret the term SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and status of the species. ‘‘catastrophic losses’’ differently when Wildlife Service (Service), announce a In making this finding, we relied on applying CAS 416.50(b)(1) and FAR 90-day finding on a petition to list the information provided by the petitioners, 31.205–19(e)? If so, how does the use of Mussentuchit gilia (Gilia [=Aliciella] and readily available in our files, and the term differ between the two tenuis) as threatened or endangered evaluated that information in applications? under the Endangered Species Act of accordance with 50 CFR 424.14(b). Our 2. Under CAS 416.50(b)(1), the 1973, as amended. We find the petition process of coming to a 90-day finding contractor is required to assign does not provide substantial under section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act and insurance costs on the basis of the information indicating that listing Gilia section 424.14(b) of our regulations is projected average loss. Actual losses [=Aliciella] tenuis may be warranted. limited to a determination of whether cannot be used unless they approximate Therefore, we will not be initiating a the information in the petition meets the the projected average loss. FAR 31.205– further status review in response to this ‘‘substantial scientific information’’ 19(c)(4) disallows self-insurance costs petition. The public may submit to us threshold. for catastrophic losses. Thus, if the term any new information that becomes We added Aliciella tenuis to our list ‘‘catastrophic losses’’ is interpreted as available concerning the status of the of candidate species on September 30, having the same meaning in both CAS species or threats to it. 1993, as a category 2 candidate species VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:54 Jan 25, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM 26JAP1 erjones on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS 4338 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Proposed Rules (58 FR 51144). In the February 28, 1996, remained obscure until the 1980s. The in the petition and readily available in Notice of Review (61 FR 7595), we species was described in the scientific our files, is presented below. discontinued the use of multiple literature in 1989 (Smith and Neese A. Present or Threatened Destruction, candidate categories and considered the 1989) as Gilia tenuis and subsequently Modification, or Curtailment of the former category 1 candidates as simply included in the resurrected genus Species’ Habitat or Range ‘‘candidates’’ for listing purposes. The Aliciella in 1998 (Porter 1998). We A. tenuis was removed from the accept the name Aliciella tenuis as the The petition claims that there are 17 candidate list at that time. This species valid name for Mussentuchit gilia. populations of Aliciella tenuis, and that currently has no Federal regulatory Aliciella tenuis is a rare, edaphically the species is threatened mainly by status. restricted plant in southwestern Emery, activities surrounding oil, gas, and On March 10, 2004, we received a southeastern Sevier, and northern mineral extraction; livestock trampling; formal petition, dated March 9, 2004, Wayne Counties, Utah. The species’ off-road vehicle (ORV) use; recreational from the Southern Utah Wilderness range spans about 45 miles (mi) (72 activities; and weed invasions. Alliance, Center for Native Ecosystems, kilometers (km)) from its South Desert Oil, Gas, and Mineral Extraction and Utah Native Plant Society, population in Waterpocket Fold within requesting that the Mussentuchit gilia Capitol Reef National Park to its Secret The petition cites general information (Gilia [=Aliciella] tenuis) found in Utah Mesa population in the San Rafael on oil, gas, and mineral extraction. The be listed as threatened or endangered Swell. The species has been delineated petition asserts that 3 of 17 populations pursuant to section 4 of the Act. This into 7 populations, with 1 to 8 separate are in areas under lease for oil and gas petition was identical to a petition sites in each population, for a total of 39 development. Petitioners claim that oil, submitted on May 19, 2003, to which, sites (Clark 2005). Based on Dr. Johnson gas, and mineral exploration involve due to funding limitations, we were (2005, memo to Clark), DNA studies construction of well pads, roads, unable to respond during Fiscal Year between these populations indicate four pipelines, and other associated (FY) 2003.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gilia Tenuis
    THE STATUS OF GILIA TENUIS (sketch of plant here) LATIN NAME: Gilia (Aliciella ) tenuis Smith and Neese COMMON NAME: Mussentuchit gilia FAMILY: Polemoniaceae ORIGINAL CITATION: Smith, F.J. and E.C. Neese. 1989. A perennial species of Gilia (Polemoniaceae) from Utah. Great Basin Naturalist 49:461-465. STATE OF OCCURRENCE: Utah CURRENT FEDERAL STATUS: Former Category 2 (but Porter and Heil 1994 say “Federal Candidate Priority 1.” AUTHOR OF REPORT: Allison Jones DATE: January, 2003 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GENERAL SPECIES INFORMATION . Nomenclature and Taxonomy . History of knowledge of taxon . Species Description . Non-technical description . Technical description . Habitat . Life History and Ecology . Competitive interactions, and herbivory Pollination, reproduction and seed dispersal Niche, and rarity Summary, life history and ecology II. SPECIFIC SPECIES OCCURRENCES Range/geographic distribution . Known, Current Occurrences . Last Chance population Chimney Canyon population Seger’s Hole population Coal Wash population / Secret Mesa population Prickly Pear Bend population 2 3 Capitol Reef population Split population Lost & Found population Seger’s Road population Bighorn Pocket population Erin’s Flat population Gypsum Theory population Horsefly Hell population Lost Wash population Keyhole population South of Slaughter population Seger’s Overlook South population Potential Occurrences . Occurrence Summary/Current Population Status . III. CURRENT MANAGEMENT Present Legal Status . Past and Present Conservation Efforts . Inadequacy of Existing
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Historical Biogeography, and Diversification of Angiosperm
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 122 (2018) 59–79 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny, historical biogeography, and diversification of angiosperm order T Ericales suggest ancient Neotropical and East Asian connections ⁎ Jeffrey P. Rosea, , Thomas J. Kleistb, Stefan D. Löfstrandc, Bryan T. Drewd, Jürg Schönenbergere, Kenneth J. Sytsmaa a Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 430 Lincoln Dr., Madison, WI 53706, USA b Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, 260 Panama St., Stanford, CA 94305, USA c Department of Ecology, Environment and Botany, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm Sweden d Department of Biology, University of Nebraska-Kearney, Kearney, NE 68849, USA e Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, AT-1030, Vienna, Austria ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Inferring interfamilial relationships within the eudicot order Ericales has remained one of the more recalcitrant Ericaceae problems in angiosperm phylogenetics, likely due to a rapid, ancient radiation. As a result, no comprehensive Ericales time-calibrated tree or biogeographical analysis of the order has been published. Here, we elucidate phyloge- Long distance dispersal netic relationships within the order and then conduct time-dependent biogeographical and diversification Supermatrix analyses by using a taxon and locus-rich supermatrix approach on one-third of the extant species diversity
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Biology for Sexual Reproduction in Plants - Unlike for Animals • Rely on Movement of (1) Pollen,(2) Young Embryo Encased
    Sexual Reproduction in Plants • Movement onto land is an issue Pollination Biology for sexual reproduction in plants - unlike for animals • rely on movement of (1) pollen,(2) young embryo encased . real story of the birds & bees . in a seed (or fruit), or (3) spores and beetles, bugs, butterflies, bats pollination biology seed dispersal Sexual Reproduction in Plants Coevolution Pollination and seed/spore dispersal important Coevolution – interactions between two different clades as aspects of biosystematics in plants: selective forces on each other, resulting in adaptations that • Gene flow increase their interdependency • Outcrossing vs. inbreeding • Reproductive isolation Animal-flowering plant interaction is a classic example of coevolution: • Speciation spore dispersal • Co-speciation (coevolution) pollination biology seed dispersal • Plants evolve elaborate methods to attract animal pollinators • Animals evolve specialized body parts and behaviors that aid plant pollination 1 Coevolution Divergence vs. Convergence • classic example of both divergence and convergence in • insect lineages diversified prior to angiosperms, but co- pollination is the family Polemoniaceae opted by and responded to by angiosperms • frequent shifts to different “pollination syndromes” from ancestral bee pollination V. Grant hummingbird bat Polemoniaceae Ipomopsis aggregata subsp. attenuata tip color = Phlox subulata subsp. subulata Linanthus californicus Ipomopsis arizonica Linanthus dichotomus Ipomopsis congesta Linanthus dianthiflorus Ipomopsis pumila spiritus − DNA tree with Linanthus parryae Phlox oklahomensis Phlox stansburyi Phlox drummondii subsp.Phlox glaberrimadrummondii subsp. interior Phlox maculata subsp. maculata pollinator Phlox condensata Divergence vs. Convergence Phlox multiflora pollinators Phlox diffusa Ipomopsis aggregata subsp. formosissima Ipomopsis aggregata subsp. Ipomopsis tenuituba subsp. latiloba Phlox bryoides Ipomopsis aggregata subsp. candida Ipomopsis polyantha Ipomopsis sancti Ipomopsis multiflora subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Utah Navajo Sandstone Endemics Conservation Agreement
    Central Utah Navajo Sandstone Endemics Conservation Agreement for Aliciella cespitosa (Rabbit Valley gilia or Wonderland alice-flower) Aliciella tenuis (Mussentuchit gilia) Astragalus harrisonii (Harrison’s milkvetch) Cymopterus beckii (Pinnate spring-parsley) Erigeron maguirei (Maguire’s daisy) U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Fishlake National Forest U.S.D.O.I. Bureau of Land Management, Utah State Office U.S.D.O.I. National Park Service, Capitol Reef National Park U.S.D.O.I. Fish and Wildlife Service, Utah Field Office August 14, 2006 1 Table of Contents Part 1. Conservation Agreement ...................................................................................5 I. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................5 II. INTERAGENCY PARTNERSHIP ..............................................................................6 III. SPECIES INVOLVED AND THEIR LEGAL STATUS...........................................7 A. Aliciella cespitosa (Gilia caespitosa)...........................................................7 B. Aliciella tenuis (Gilia tenuis)...........................................................................7 C. Astragalus harrisonii......................................................................................8 D. Cymopterus beckii...........................................................................................8 E. Erigeron maguirei............................................................................................9 IV. SPECIES NOMECLATURE
    [Show full text]
  • Download Manuscript: Smithgoldberg060115.Docx Smith and Goldberg 2015 Tempo and Mode of Color Evolution 1
    Manuscript Click here to download Manuscript: SmithGoldberg060115.docx Smith and Goldberg 2015 Tempo and mode of color evolution 1 Tempo and mode of flower color evolution1 Stacey D. Smith2,4 and Emma E. Goldberg3 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA 3Department of Ecology, Evolution & Behavior, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55105, USA 1Manuscript received __________; revision accepted ___________ The authors thank S. Otto for advice, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. This publication was supported in part by funds from the National Science Foundation (DEB 1355518 and 1413855 to SDS). 4Email for correspondence: [email protected] Smith and Goldberg 2015 Tempo and mode of color evolution 2 ABSTRACT Premise of the Study: Flower color is one of the best-studied floral traits in terms of its genetic basis and ecological significance, yet few studies have examined the processes that shape its evolution across deep timescales. Advances in comparative methods along with larger phylogenies for floral radiations offer new opportunities for investigating the macroevolution of flower color. Methods: We examine the tempo and mode of flower color evolution in four clades (Antirrhineae, Iochrominae, Loeselieae, Quamoclit) using models that incorporate trait transitions and lineage diversification. Focusing on floral anthocyanin pigmentation, we estimate rates of gain and loss of pigmentation and test whether these changes occur predominantly through anagenesis or cladogenesis. Key Results: We found that the tempo of pigment gains and losses varies significantly across the clades and that the rates of change are often asymmetrical, favoring gains over losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Utah Rare Plant List
    Sego Lily November 2009 32 (6) Developing a Utah Rare Plant List by Walter Fertig, UNPS Rare Plant Committee November 2009 Vol. 32, No. 6 In this issue: Developing a Utah Rare Plant list 1 Chapter News . 2 UNPS Contributes to White Dome Preserve . 3 The UNPS Rare Plant Ranking System . 6 2009 Utah Native Plant Society Rare Plants of Utah List I. Extremely High Priority . 8 II. High Priority . 10 III. Watch . 12 IV. Need Data . 15 USFWS Updating Utah‘s Endan- gered and Candidate Lists . 18 Left: Charleston Mountain violet (Viola purpureus var. charlestonensis or V. charlestonensis) can be easily recognized by its yellow flowers and gray-pubescent foliage. This Carmel Formation endemic of southern Utah and southern Nevada is on the UNPS Watch list. Photo from Zion National Park by W. Fertig. While they often do not get the same attention or notoriety, plants can be just as endangered or threatened with extinction as animal species. With a few notable exceptions, conservationists have traditionally been more concerned with the plight of rare game animals, showy birds, and edible fish than with less charismatic vertebrates, inverte- brates, or plants. This bias was reflected in early efforts to protect endangered species. The first national law, passed in 1966, only addressed vertebrates and was little more than an effort to compile a list of vulnerable species. It pro- vided little in the way of habitat protection or penalties. The law was amended in 1969, but it remained until 1973 before an Endangered Species Act was passed that had real teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Reef National Park Livestock Grazing and Trailing Management Plan and Environmental Assessment
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Capitol Reef National Park July 2018 Capitol Reef National Park Livestock Grazing and Trailing Management Plan and Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION .............................................................. 1-1 Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Livestock Grazing and Trailing in Capitol Reef ....................................................................... 1-1 Planning Area ............................................................................................................................ 1-5 Rangeland Condition Assessments ........................................................................................... 1-5 Desired Conditions .................................................................................................................... 1-5 Impact Topics Identified Through Scoping ............................................................................... 1-6 CHAPTER 2: ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................ 2-1 Alternative 1 (No Action) ......................................................................................................... 2-1 Sandy 3 Allotment Grazing .......................................................................................... 2-1 Livestock Trailing .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Capitol Reef National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Capitol Reef National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/154 ON THE COVER Last Chance townsendia (Townsendia aprica), Capitol Reef National Park. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Capitol Reef National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/154 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 January 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientifi c literature reviews; and peer- reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Federal Register, 71 FR 4337; Centralized Library
    Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Proposed Rules 4337 • After analyzing the public and FAR, how does a contractor recover DATES: The finding announced in this comments, the FAR Council withdrew amounts related to catastrophic losses, document was made on January 19, the proposed definition. In since the costs cannot be assigned based 2006. You may submit new information recommending withdrawal of the rule, on actual costs under CAS (and concerning this species for our the June 26, 2003 report of the FAR Part therefore are not allowable as actual consideration at any time. 31 Streamlining Committee noted the costs), and the costs are unallowable as ADDRESSES: The complete file for this following: self-insurance charges under FAR? finding is available for public Upon further review, the Committee 3. How does the insurance industry inspection, by appointment, during recommends that the proposed definition of use the term ‘‘catastrophic losses?’’ normal business hours at the Utah Fish catastrophic losses be deleted from the final 4. How does the insurance industry’s and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and rule. The Committee continues to believe that use of the term ‘‘catastrophic losses’’ Wildlife Service, 2369 West Orton the proposed definition is consistent with the differ from its use in CAS and FAR, if Circle, Suite 50, West Valley City, Utah intent of the promulgators of the current any? 84119. Submit new information, language, as evidenced by the March 19, 5. Have there been problems in the materials, comments, or questions 1979 Committee report underlying DAR Case implementation of CAS 416.50(b)(1) as 78–400–7.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving Relationships and Revealing Hybridization in Aliciella Subsection Subnuda (Polemoniaceae)
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2019-11-19 Resolving Relationships and Revealing Hybridization in Aliciella Subsection Subnuda (Polemoniaceae) Theresa Conley Saunders Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Life Sciences Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Saunders, Theresa Conley, "Resolving Relationships and Revealing Hybridization in Aliciella Subsection Subnuda (Polemoniaceae)" (2019). Theses and Dissertations. 9126. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/9126 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Resolving Relationships and Revealing Hybridization in Aliciella Subsection Subnuda (Polemoniaceae) Theresa Conley Saunders A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Leigh A. Johnson, Chair Robert L. Johnson Steven D. Leavitt Department of Biology Brigham Young University Copyright © 2019 Theresa Conley Saunders All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Resolving Relationships and Revealing Hybridization in Aliciella Subsection Subnuda (Polemoniaceae) Theresa Conley Saunders Department of Biology, BYU Master of Science Phylogenetics is crucial in the study of evolutionary processes and the determination of appropriate conservation units, and often these efforts are complicated by hybridization and introgression. Aliciella subsection Subnuda consists of seven species of herbaceous plants occurring in Utah and the Four Corners region of North America. Previous molecular and morphological work left relationships in the subsection unresolved. Here, we use comparative DNA sequencing of ITS and cpDNA regions and RAD-seq data to clarify phylogenetic relationships and examine the role of hybridization in the subsection.
    [Show full text]