DOCSLIB.ORG

Capitol Reef National Park Livestock Grazing and Trailing Management Plan and Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capitol Reef National Park Livestock Grazing and Trailing Management Plan and Environmental Assessment National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Capitol Reef National Park July 2018 Capitol Reef National Park Livestock Grazing and Trailing Management Plan and Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION .............................................................. 1-1 Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Livestock Grazing and Trailing in Capitol Reef ....................................................................... 1-1 Planning Area ............................................................................................................................ 1-5 Rangeland Condition Assessments ........................................................................................... 1-5 Desired Conditions .................................................................................................................... 1-5 Impact Topics Identified Through Scoping ............................................................................... 1-6 CHAPTER 2: ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................ 2-1 Alternative 1 (No Action) ......................................................................................................... 2-1 Sandy 3 Allotment Grazing .......................................................................................... 2-1 Livestock Trailing ........................................................................................................ 2-3 Monitoring and Adaptive Management ....................................................................... 2-5 General Administration of Livestock Grazing and Trailing......................................... 2-5 Alternative 2 (NPS Preferred Alternative) ................................................................................ 2-5 Sandy 3 Allotment Grazing .......................................................................................... 2-5 Livestock Trailing ........................................................................................................ 2-8 Monitoring and Adaptive Management ....................................................................... 2-9 General Administration of Livestock Grazing and Trailing....................................... 2-13 Invasive Vegetation Management .............................................................................. 2-13 Alternatives Eliminated from Detailed Analysis ..................................................................... 2-14 Discontinue Grazing or Trailing ................................................................................ 2-14 Alternative Grazing Locations ................................................................................... 2-14 Grand Canyon Trust and Great Old Broads for Wilderness Alternative .................... 2-14 CHAPTER 3: AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................. 3-1 Soils ........................................................................................................................................... 3-1 Upland and Riparian Vegetation Communities ......................................................................... 3-4 Riparian and Wetland Vegetation ................................................................................ 3-8 Invasive Plant Species ................................................................................................ 3-11 Vegetation Communities and Climate Change Predictions ....................................... 3-12 Water Resources ...................................................................................................................... 3-13 Special Status Species ............................................................................................................. 3-18 Wright Fishhook Cactus ............................................................................................. 3-19 Winkler Cactus ........................................................................................................... 3-21 Last Chance Townsendia ........................................................................................... 3-23 Mexican Spotted Owls and Designated Critical Habitat ............................................ 3-25 Migratory and Resident Birds ................................................................................................. 3-29 Migratory Bird Species of Concern ........................................................................... 3-32 Birds in Capitol Reef National Park and Climate Change ......................................... 3-33 Wilderness ............................................................................................................................... 3-33 Permittee Traditional Uses and Socioeconomics .................................................................... 3-36 Sandy 3 Allotment ...................................................................................................... 3-38 Trailing Permit Holders .............................................................................................. 3-38 Capitol Reef National Park Livestock Grazing and Trailing Management Plan i Environmental Assessment July 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 4: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ................................................................. 4-1 Cumulative Impacts ...................................................................................................... 4-1 Soils ........................................................................................................................................... 4-3 Impacts under Alternative 1 .......................................................................................... 4-3 Impacts under Alternative 2 .......................................................................................... 4-7 Upland and Riparian Vegetation Associations ........................................................................ 4-12 Impacts under Alternative 1 ........................................................................................ 4-12 Impacts under Alternative 2 ........................................................................................ 4-20 Water Resources ...................................................................................................................... 4-25 Impacts under Alternative 1 ........................................................................................ 4-25 Impacts under Alternative 2 ........................................................................................ 4-29 Special Status Species .............................................................................................................. 4-32 Special Status Plants ................................................................................................... 4-32 Mexican Spotted Owls ................................................................................................ 4-42 Migratory and Resident Birds .................................................................................................. 4-49 Impacts under Alternative 1 ........................................................................................ 4-49 Impacts under Alternative 2 ........................................................................................ 4-58 Wilderness ............................................................................................................................... 4-64 Impacts under Alternative 1 ........................................................................................ 4-64 Impacts under Alternative 2 ........................................................................................ 4-66 Permittee Traditional Uses and Socioeconomics ..................................................................... 4-69 Impacts under Alternative 1 ........................................................................................ 4-69 Impacts under Alternative 2 ........................................................................................ 4-70 CHAPTER 5: LIST OF AGENCIES AND PERSONS CONSULTED ........................................... 5-1 Cooperating Agency Involvement ............................................................................................. 5-1 Agency Consultation .................................................................................................................. 5-1 Endangered Species Act ............................................................................................... 5-1 National Historic Preservation Act ............................................................................... 5-1 Tribal Consultation .................................................................................................................... 5-2 Distribution List ......................................................................................................................... 5-3 Federal Departments and Agencies .............................................................................. 5-3 State Government ......................................................................................................... 5-4 County and Local Agencies .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US Fish and Wildlife Service
    BARNEBY REED-MUSTARD (S. barnebyi ) CLAY REED-MUSTARD SHRUBBY REED-MUSTARD (S,arguillacea) (S. suffrutescens) .-~ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service UTAH REED—MUSTARDS: CLAY REED-MUSTARD (SCHOENOCRAMBE ARGILLACEA) BARNEBY REED—MUSTARD (SCHOENOCRAMBE BARNEBYI) SI-IRUBBY REED-MUSTARD (SCHOENOCRAMBE SUFFRUTESCENS) RECOVERY PLAN Prepared by Region 6, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Approved: Date: (~19~- Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect the species. Plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will only be attained and funds expended contingent upon appropriations, priorities, and other budgetary constraints. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approvals of any individuals or agencies, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, involved in the plan formulation. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as an~roved Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Citation should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Utah reed—mustards: clay reed—mustard (Schoenocrambe argillacea), Barneby reed-mustard (Schoenocrambe barnebyl), shrubby reed—mustard (Schoenacranibe suffrutescens) recovery plan. Denver, Colorado. 22 pp. Additional copies may be purchased from: Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Telephone: 301/492—6403 or 1—800—582—3421 The fee for the plan varies depending on the number of pages of the plan.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened, Endangered, Candidate & Proposed Plant Species of Utah
    TECHNICAL NOTE USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Boise, Idaho and Salt Lake City, Utah TN PLANT MATERIALS NO. 52 MARCH 2011 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, CANDIDATE & PROPOSED PLANT SPECIES OF UTAH Derek Tilley, Agronomist, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Loren St. John, PMC Team Leader, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Dan Ogle, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Casey Burns, State Biologist, NRCS, Salt Lake City, Utah Last Chance Townsendia (Townsendia aprica). Photo by Megan Robinson. This technical note identifies the current threatened, endangered, candidate and proposed plant species listed by the U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service (USDI FWS) in Utah. Review your county list of threatened and endangered species and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Conservation Data Center (CDC) GIS T&E database to see if any of these species have been identified in your area of work. Additional information on these listed species can be found on the USDI FWS web site under “endangered species”. Consideration of these species during the planning process and determination of potential impacts related to scheduled work will help in the conservation of these rare plants. Contact your Plant Material Specialist, Plant Materials Center, State Biologist and Area Biologist for additional guidance on identification of these plants and NRCS responsibilities related to the Endangered Species Act. 2 Table of Contents Map of Utah Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Plant Species 4 Threatened & Endangered Species Profiles Arctomecon humilis Dwarf Bear-poppy ARHU3 6 Asclepias welshii Welsh’s Milkweed ASWE3 8 Astragalus ampullarioides Shivwits Milkvetch ASAM14 10 Astragalus desereticus Deseret Milkvetch ASDE2 12 Astragalus holmgreniorum Holmgren Milkvetch ASHO5 14 Astragalus limnocharis var.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Status Species List
    APPENDIX J SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES LIST SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES LIST APPENDIX J SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES LIST Common Name Scientific Name State Class Status1 A Caddisfly Farula constricta OR Insect BS Adder’s-tongue Ophioglossum pusillum OR Plant BS Agave, Arizona Agave arizonica AZ Plant FE Agave, Murphey Agave murpheyi AZ Plant BS Agave, Santa Cruz Striped Agave parviflora AZ Plant BS Agoseris, Pink Agoseris lackschewitzii ID Plant BS Albatross, Short-tailed Phoebastris albatrus AK, CA Bird FE Alkaligrass, Howell’s Puccinellia howelli CA Plant BS Alkaligrass, Lemon’s Puccinellia lemmonii CA Plant BS Alkaligrass, Parish’s Puccinellia parishii CA, MT Plant BS Alpine-aster, Tall Oreostemma elatum CA Plant BS Alpine-parsley, Trotter’s Oreoxis trotteri UT Plant BS Alumroot, Duran’s Heuchera duranii CA Plant BS Amaranth, California Amaranthus californicus MT Plant BS Ambersnail, Kanab Oxyloma haydeni kanabensis AZ, UT Snail FE Ambrosia, San Diego Ambrosia pumila CA Plant FE Chlorogalum purpureum var. Amole, Purple CA Plant FT purpureum Amphipod, Malheur Cave Stygobromus hubbsi OR Crustacean BS Amphipod, Noel’s Gammarus desperatus NM Crustacean PE Angelica, King’s Angelica kingii ID Plant BS Angelica, Rough Angelica scabrida NV Plant BS Apachebush Apacheria chircahuensis NM Plant BS Apple, Indian Peraphyllum ramosissimum ID Plant BS Arrowhead, Sanford’s Sagittaria sanfordii CA Plant BS Aster, Gorman’s Eucephalus gormanii OR Plant BS Aster, Pygmy Eurybia pygmaea AK Plant BS Aster, Red Rock Canyon Ionactis caelestis NV Plant BS Avens, Mountain Senecio moresbiensis AK Plant BS Baccharis, Encinitis Baccharis vanessae CA Plant FT Balloonvine Cardiospermum corindum AZ Plant BS Balsamorhiza macrolepis var. Balsamroot, Big-scale CA Plant BS macrolepis Balsamroot, Large-leaved Balsamorhiza macrophylla MT Plant BS Balsamroot, Silky Balsamorhiza sericea CA Plant BS Balsamroot, Woolly Balsamorhiza hookeri var.
    [Show full text]
  • USA Reisebericht 2009
    Tag 12 (Dienstag, 14.7.2009 – Cathedral Valley Day) Torrey, UT Heute morgen wurde ich erst um 6:55 Uhr wach – recht spät. Trotzdem waren wir relativ schnell, so dass wir schon um 8:30 Uhr im Auto saßen und um 9:00 an der River Ford standen, um den Loop durch das Cathedral Valley zu beginnen. Und zwar über die Harnett Road. Und es wird sich gelohnt haben. Während ich die Furt (River Ford) durchfahre, begleitet mich Barbara außerhalb des Autos im Wasser. Es geht ohne Probleme. Danach ist die Hartnett Road allerdings noch mit tiefem Sand versehen, so dass wir erst mal ein wenig mit dem 4WD durchflügen müssen. Insgesamt liegen inkl. Abstechern 66 Meilen auf Dirt Roads vor uns. Die ersten Meilen auf der Hartnett Road sind unterschiedlicher Qualität aber eigentlich gut zu fahren. Erster Stopp ist dann an den Bentonite Hills, gerundete bunte Hügel. Danach geht es weiter zum Lower South Desert Overlook, der auf einer einer Meilen langen Stichstraße von der Hartnett Road zu erreichen ist. Vom Parkplatz muss man dann noch eine Viertel Meile bis zum Rand laufen, an dem man einen Blick auf die Lower South Desert hat, die parallel zur Waterpocket Fold verläuft. Direkt vor dem Overlook liegt ein 500 Fuß hoher Sandstein Monolith aus Entrada Sandstone, der Jailhouse Rock. Danach geht es durch eine wüstenhafte Hochebene, genannt The Hartnett, nach der auch die Straße ihren Namen hat. Hier erreicht man auch wieder den Capitol Reef Nationalpark, die Zufahrten liegen außerhalb. Den Lower Cathedral Valley Overlook lassen wir allerdings rechts liegen, da man bis zum Overlook eine Meile Cross-Country laufen müsste – und dazu habe ich keine Lust.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilia Tenuis
    THE STATUS OF GILIA TENUIS (sketch of plant here) LATIN NAME: Gilia (Aliciella ) tenuis Smith and Neese COMMON NAME: Mussentuchit gilia FAMILY: Polemoniaceae ORIGINAL CITATION: Smith, F.J. and E.C. Neese. 1989. A perennial species of Gilia (Polemoniaceae) from Utah. Great Basin Naturalist 49:461-465. STATE OF OCCURRENCE: Utah CURRENT FEDERAL STATUS: Former Category 2 (but Porter and Heil 1994 say “Federal Candidate Priority 1.” AUTHOR OF REPORT: Allison Jones DATE: January, 2003 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GENERAL SPECIES INFORMATION . Nomenclature and Taxonomy . History of knowledge of taxon . Species Description . Non-technical description . Technical description . Habitat . Life History and Ecology . Competitive interactions, and herbivory Pollination, reproduction and seed dispersal Niche, and rarity Summary, life history and ecology II. SPECIFIC SPECIES OCCURRENCES Range/geographic distribution . Known, Current Occurrences . Last Chance population Chimney Canyon population Seger’s Hole population Coal Wash population / Secret Mesa population Prickly Pear Bend population 2 3 Capitol Reef population Split population Lost & Found population Seger’s Road population Bighorn Pocket population Erin’s Flat population Gypsum Theory population Horsefly Hell population Lost Wash population Keyhole population South of Slaughter population Seger’s Overlook South population Potential Occurrences . Occurrence Summary/Current Population Status . III. CURRENT MANAGEMENT Present Legal Status . Past and Present Conservation Efforts . Inadequacy of Existing
    [Show full text]
  • Draft RECOVERY PLAN
    Winkler cactus (Pediocactus winkleri) AND San Rafael cactus (Pediocactus despainii) Draft RECOVERY PLAN December 2015 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado DISCLAIMER Recovery plans use the best available information to identify reasonable actions for protecting and recovering listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, or others. Attainment of recovery objectives and availability of funds are subject to budgetary and other constraints as well as the need to address other priorities. Nothing in this plan should be construed as a commitment or requirement for any Federal agency to obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. 1341, or any other law or regulation. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views, official position, or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in plan formulation other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director. Approved plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. The literature citation for this document should read: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2015. Winkler cactus (Pediocactus winkleri) and San Rafael cactus (Pediocactus despainii) recovery plan. Technical/agency draft. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado. xii + 133 pp. Additional copies of the draft document can be obtained from: Utah Ecological Services Office U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Sensitive Species and Ecosystems in Utah, Endemic And
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
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora and Vegetation of Capitol Reef National Park, Utah
    Vascular Flora and Vegetation of Capitol Reef National Park, Utah Kenneth D. Heil, J. Mark Porter, Rich Fleming, and William H. Romme Technical Report NPS/NAUCARE/NRTR-93/01 National Park Service Cooperative Park Studies Unit U.S. Department of the Interior at Northern Arizona University National Park Service Cooperative Park Studies Unit Northern Arizona University The National Park Service (NPS) Cooperative Park Studies Unit (CPSU) at Northern Arizona University (NAU) is unique in that it was conceptualized for operation on an ecosystem basis, rather than being restrained by state or NPS boundaries. The CPSU was established to provide research for the 33 NPS units located within the Colorado Plateau, an ecosystem that shares similar resources and their associated management problems. Utilizing the university's physical resources and faculty expertise, the CPSU facilitates multidisciplinary research in NPS units on the Colorado Plateau, which encompasses four states and three NPS regions—Rocky Mountain, Southwest, and Western. The CPSU provides scientific and technical guidance for effective management of natural and cultural resources within those NPS units. The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social science research through the Colorado Plateau Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of techni­ cal workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Unit Staff Charles van Riper, III, Unit Leader Peter G. Rowlands, Research Scientist Henry E. McCutchen, Research Scientist Mark K. Sogge, Ecologist Charles Drost, Zoologist Elena T. Deshler, Biological Technician Paul R. Deshler, Technical Information Specialist Connie C. Cole, Editor Margaret Rasmussen, Administrative Clerk Jennifer Henderson, Secretary National Park Service Review Documents in this series contain information of a preliminary nature and are prepared primarily for internal use within the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking Routes in Capitol Reef's Cathedral District
    Capitol Reef National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Hiking Routes in Capitol Reef’s Cathedral District A remote backcountry with no paved roads, Capitol Reef’s northern Cathedral District features stark landscapes and a high degree of solitude. Here the northern flanks of Waterpocket Fold give way to broad deserts, stunning monoliths, and volcanic dikes and crags. The Cathedral and Hartnet roads (passable only to high- clearance vehicles; four-wheel drive often recommended) provide access to a number of short hikes, a selection of which is described here. These routes are not official, maintained trails. Route conditions, including obstacles in canyons, change frequently due to weather, flash floods, rockfall, and other hazards. Routefinding, navigation, and map-reading skills are critical. Do not rely solely on unofficial route markers (rock cairns, etc.); they are not maintained by the National Cathedral Valley Park Service (NPS), may not indicate the route in this description, or may be absent. Roads in this area are maintained infrequently and are not plowed in winter. Some sections of road cross areas of bentonite clay, which becomes impassable when wet. Deep, soft sand may also exist on roads. Roads may occasionally require four-wheel drive, and may quickly become impassable due to wet weather. At the south end of the Hartnet Road near Highway 24, vehicles must ford the Fremont River; there is no bridge over the river. Do not attempt to cross the river during floods or other periods of high water. Ask at the visitor center about river ford conditions. Check weather forecasts and road reports before departing.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 17/Thursday, January 26, 2006
    Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Proposed Rules 4337 • After analyzing the public and FAR, how does a contractor recover DATES: The finding announced in this comments, the FAR Council withdrew amounts related to catastrophic losses, document was made on January 19, the proposed definition. In since the costs cannot be assigned based 2006. You may submit new information recommending withdrawal of the rule, on actual costs under CAS (and concerning this species for our the June 26, 2003 report of the FAR Part therefore are not allowable as actual consideration at any time. 31 Streamlining Committee noted the costs), and the costs are unallowable as ADDRESSES: The complete file for this following: self-insurance charges under FAR? finding is available for public Upon further review, the Committee 3. How does the insurance industry inspection, by appointment, during recommends that the proposed definition of use the term ‘‘catastrophic losses?’’ normal business hours at the Utah Fish catastrophic losses be deleted from the final 4. How does the insurance industry’s and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and rule. The Committee continues to believe that use of the term ‘‘catastrophic losses’’ Wildlife Service, 2369 West Orton the proposed definition is consistent with the differ from its use in CAS and FAR, if Circle, Suite 50, West Valley City, Utah intent of the promulgators of the current any? 84119. Submit new information, language, as evidenced by the March 19, 5. Have there been problems in the materials, comments, or questions 1979 Committee report underlying DAR Case implementation of CAS 416.50(b)(1) as 78–400–7.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipac Resource List
    IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service IPaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. Location Arizona and New Mexico Local offices Arizona Ecological Services Field Office (602) 242-0210 (602) 242-2513 9828 North 31st Ave #c3 Phoenix, AZ 85051-2517 http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona/ http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/EndangeredSpecies_Main.html New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office (505) 346-2525 (505) 346-2542 2105 Osuna Road Ne Albuquerque, NM 87113-1001 http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/NewMexico/ http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/ES_Lists_Main2.html Endangered species This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
    [Show full text]