DOCSLIB.ORG

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Local Plan Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) August 2018 Infrastructure Delivery Plan August 2018 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Contents Page Introduction 3 Background and Methodology 5 Topic 1: Transport 10 Topic 2: Education 17 Topic 3: Healthcare 21 Topic 4: Social Infrastructure 25 Topic 5: Public Services 29 Topic 6: Biodiversity and Flood Infrastructure 32 Topic 7: Utility Services 36 Summary 40 Next Steps 40 Glossary 41 Appendices Appendix 1: Infrastructure Delivery Schedules Appendix 2: Local Plan Development Strategy Map 2 Introduction 1.1 This Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) document has been produced by Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council (The Council). 1.2 An IDP is a document which specifically identifies the infrastructure (including physical, social and green infrastructure) which is necessary to support the development proposed within the Council’s Local Plan, including the Policy and Proposals Map. It is an important document which sets out what exactly is required and how this will be delivered. It is a technical piece of evidence which underpins the development strategy for the borough and ensures that the vision of the Local Plan can be achieved. 1.3 The provision and delivery of infrastructure is vital for the development of sustainable communities, new homes, and economic growth. 1.4 The IDP provides information on existing capacity or deficit in demand for services, details of existing committed infrastructure delivery, and the impact of proposed new development on services and infrastructure. It sets out what will be needed to support new development, including delivery body/bodies, location, type, timescale, cost and source of funding, where this information is available. 1.5 The IDP has been informed through consultation with service providers and is based upon information currently available as at August 2018. This document has been produced alongside the emerging Local Plan. 1.6 The IDP has been prepared in readiness for publication of the Regulation 19 version of the Local Plan. What is infrastructure? 1.7 Infrastructure planning is concerned with how the many different strands of infrastructure can be identified, considered and planned for. Whilst there is no definition within the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), the Planning Act 2008 Section 216 (2) defines infrastructure as: (a) roads and other transport facilities, (b) flood defences, (c) schools and other educational facilities, (d) medical facilities, (e) sporting and recreational facilities (f) open spaces, and (g) affordable housing. 3 1.8 The Oxford Dictionary (online) states that infrastructure is “the basic physical and organisational structures and facilities needed for the operation of a society or enterprise”. 1.9 Within this document, the following forms of infrastructure are included for study: Topic Relevant Categories Transport Road, bus, rail, cycling and walking Education Primary and Secondary schools, further and higher education, adult learning/community learning Healthcare Doctors Surgeries, Hospitals, Healthcare/Adult social services Social Infrastructure Sports recreation and open space, libraries Public Services Emergency Services (police/fire/ambulance), recycling, waste management and disposal Biodiversity and Flood Infrastructure Biodiversity, flood and surface water management Utility Services Water, wastewater, electricity, gas, telecommunications 4 Background and Methodology National Policy and Guidance 2.1 The National Planning Policy Framework (published March 2012 and updated July 2018) states that local planning authorities should set out the strategic priorities for the area in the Local Plan. This should include strategic policies to plan positively for the development and infrastructure required in the area to meet the objectives, principles and policies of this Framework. Furthermore, the Council has a duty to cooperate with neighbouring authorities, public, voluntary and private sector organisations. 2.2 In respect of infrastructure, the NPPF states that local planning authorities should work with other authorities and providers to assess the quality and capacity of infrastructure for transport, water supply, wastewater and its treatment, energy (including heat), telecommunications, utilities, waste, health, social care, education, flood risk and coastal change management, and its ability to meet forecast demands; and take account of the need for strategic infrastructure including nationally significant infrastructure within their areas. 2.3 The NPPF states that Plans should set out the contributions expected from development. This should include setting out the levels and types of affordable housing provision required, along with other infrastructure (such as that needed for education, health, transport, flood and water management and green infrastructure). Such policies should not undermine the deliverability of the plan. Adequate, relevant and up-to-date evidence must be used to assess the quality and capacity of such infrastructure and its ability to meet future demands. 2.4 The NPPF is clear that it is important to ensure that there is a reasonable prospect that planned infrastructure is deliverable in a timely fashion. To facilitate this, it is important that local planning authorities understand district-wide development costs at the time Local Plans are drawn up. For this reason, infrastructure and development policies should be planned at the same time, in the Local Plan. The Council is thus required to plan positively to ensure that development and infrastructure needs are met. 2.5 Fundamentally, the Local Plan must be capable of being delivered. Early discussion with infrastructure providers is particularly important. 2.6 National Planning Policy Guidance (NPPG) states that “the detail concerning planned infrastructure provision can be set out in a supporting document such as an infrastructure delivery programme that can be updated regularly. However the key 5 infrastructure requirements on which delivery of the plan depends should be contained in the Local Plan itself.” Local Context 2.7 The Council does not currently have an IDP. Tonbridge and Malling have historically sought funding for infrastructure where required for individual developments through Section 106 agreements (also known as planning obligations). New development typically is expected to meet the needs it generates either through this means or by delivery on site. This remains the case. Whilst an assessment of the capacity for introducing the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) has been undertaken as part of the whole plan viability work, the Council is not minded to progress work on CIL until the Local Plan has progressed and been examined. 2.8 The duty for statutory agencies and infrastructure providers to meet their obligations through their own funding sources and investment plans remains. South East Local Enterprise Partnership 2.9 The South East Local Enterprise Partnership (SELEP) is one of 38 LEPs, established to “provide the clear vision and strategic leadership to drive sustainable private sector- led growth and job creation in their area”. 2.10 Several schemes within the borough were previously identified within the SELEP Kent and Medway Growth Deal. This included coordinated congestion relief for Tonbridge Town Centre at a cost of £3.87million (part funded through the Local Growth Fund (LGF)), and the partial funding of improvements to the Leigh Barrier flood defences. At Peters Village at Wouldham, additional investment at Junction 4 of the M20 was identified to also support Kings Hill as part of the West Kent (A21 corridor) SEFUND investments, at a cost of £100 million. 2.11 Some forthcoming and planned highways schemes continue to utilise SELEP funding. This is explored in Appendix 1. Methodology 2.12 This document will assess current infrastructure provision, needs, deficits and future requirements for the infrastructure listed in Section 1. These are: Transport; Education; Healthcare; Social Infrastructure; Public Services; Biodiversity and Flood Infrastructure; and Utility Services. 2.13 The key outcomes are: Provide an up to date picture of current infrastructure supply and demand; Outline any planned projects; 6 Assess the impact of the Local Plan Development Strategy on existing infrastructure and identify any gaps; Identify funding and costs where information is available, to ensure that the Local Plan Development Strategy is deliverable. 2.14 The Council has engaged with the following service and infrastructure providers in order to obtain the information required for this document. This includes: Highways England Environment Agency Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Kent County Council (Highways, Education, Waste, Libraries, Adult Social Services) West Kent Clinical Commissioning Group and NHS Property Services Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells Hospital Trust Kent Ambulance Services Kent Fire and Rescue Kent Police South East Water Southern Water UK Power Networks Southern Gas Networks South Eastern Trains Network Rail Arriva Hadlow College and West Kent College 2.15 This is an ongoing dialogue which will continue through to the adoption of the new Local Plan and beyond. Nb: The IDP is an evolving document. At the time of publication (August 2018) TMBC is awaiting contact and/or input/information from the following bodies/organisations: Kent County Council Libraries Kent County Council Economic Development (in respect
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning Committee Report REPORT
    Planning Committee Report REPORT SUMMARY REFERENCE NO - 18/502379/LBC APPLICATION PROPOSAL Listed Building application for proposed upgrade of Network Rail's East Farleigh Level Crossing from a Manned Gated Hand Worked (MGHW) Level Crossing to a Manually Controlled Barrier(s) (MCB) type (Resubmission). ADDRESS East Farleigh Mghw Level Crossing Farleigh Lane Farleigh Bridge East Farleigh Maidstone Kent ME16 9NB RECOMMENDATION – Grant Listed Building Consent SUMMARY OF REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION for approval The level crossing gates do not form part of the main listing for the East Farleigh railway station; The level crossing gates do not appear to be curtilage listed structures, as they constructed after the 1948; Any harm to the character, integrity and setting of the Listed Building, would be outweighed the public safety benefit; The erection of the new level crossing gates does not require Listed Building Consent. REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE Teston Parish Council wishes to see the application refused and request that the application be reported to Planning Committee for the reasons set out in their consultation response. (Note – The site lies with Barming Parish, not Teston Parish) WARD Barming And PARISH/TOWN APPLICANT Network Rail Teston COUNCIL Barming Infrastructure Limited AGENT Network Rail Infrastructure Limited DECISION DUE DATE PUBLICITY EXPIRY OFFICER SITE VISIT 27/06/18 DATE DATE 22/06/18 01/06/18 RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY (including appeals and relevant history on adjoining sites): App No Proposal Decision Date 17/506600/LBC Listed Building Consent for the upgrade Withdraw 26/2/201 of the level crossing n 8 15/504142/LBC Listed Building Consent - Replacement of Approved 14/7/201 station roof covering 5 MAIN REPORT 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF SITE 1.01 East Farleigh station lies along Farleigh Lane and just to the north of the River Medway.
    [Show full text]
  • BORSTAL & WOULDHAM River Medway N
    LOCAL CIRCUIT SW2: BORSTAL & WOULDHAM Scale (approx.): 1 km 1/2 - mile Marina Borstal Church Starting direction - start 88 Direction label (as in the walk notes) 10 Manor Road MVW M2 Borstal Street NDW 1m Wouldham Road Nashenden Farm Lane River Medway 5m 27 Wouldham Marshes Nashenden Farm 2m Railway NDW MVW N Wouldham Road 4m 3m North Downs Way School Lane Wouldham Church 21 Medway Valley Walk High Street Pilgrims Way ROADS: Significant roads PATHS: Others - on route On route Others - adJoining AdJoining LOCAL CIRCUIT SW1: BORSTAL AND WOULDHAM - 5.79 miles Linked churches: Borstal (start and finish) Wouldham (Direction 19) Roads and hindrances: The few roads involved require no more than ordinary care. The rise from Wouldham to the North Downs Way hardly qualifies as a hindrance, but demands a little respect. Notes taken: April 2017 The start and finish is at Borstal Church (ME1 3HQ) on Borstal Street near the junction with Manor Road. Mins.* OS Miles 1 Leaving Borstal Church turn right down the main road 732 668 (Borstal Street). 2 Turn right and walk down the length of Manor Road, past the children’s playground and the open space near the bottom. 3 6 At the end, by Beacon Boatyard, turn left. 4 Where the driveway to Medway Bridge Marina turns away right, instead take the path forking up to the left. 5 8 Carry straight on, ignoring the waymarked left-turn. 6 9 Follow the path as it turns right and left, bringing you directly alongside the river on your right. 7 11 Go under the motorway bridge, and walk along a little path which emerges directly opposite, still heading on, parallel to the river, between fences on both sides.
    [Show full text]
  • Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre
    GB 1204 Ch 46 Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 22324 ! National Arc F Kent Archives Offic Ch 46 Watts Charity MSS., 1579-1972 Deposited by Mr. Chinnery, Clerk to the Charity, Rochester, 1st May 1974, and 5th February, 1976 Catalogued by Alison Revell, June 1978 INTRODUCTION For information concerning the establishment of Watts's Charity, under Richard Watts of Rochester's will, in 1579 and its subsequent history, The Report of Commissioners for Inquiring Concerning Charities - Kent, 1815-39 Pp. 504-9, provides most of the basic facts. Other Rochester Charities are dealt with in the same Report (see pages 55-57, and 500-513). The Report also deals with various early legal cases concerning the Charity, and the uses to which its funds should be put, most notably the cases of the parishes of St. Margaret 's Rochester, and Strood, against the parishioners of St. Nicholas in 1680, and of the parishioners of Chatham against the Trustees of the Charity in 1808 (see L1-4B in this catalogue). The original will of Richard Watts, drawn up in 1579 and proved in the following year in the Consistory Court of Rochester, is kept in this Office under the catalogue mark, DRb PW12 (1579), with a registered copy in the volume of registered wills, DRb PWr 16 (ffl05-107). A copy is also catalogued in this collection as Ch46 L1A. Further Watts Charity material is found in the Dean and Chapter of Rochester MSS, under the KAO catalogue number, DRc Cl/1-65, and consists mainly of accounts of the Providers of the Poor of Rochester, between the years 1699 and 1819.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 9 Draft Reply to the Consultation on Rail Action Plan for Kent
    Annex 9 Draft reply to the Consultation on Rail Action Plan for Kent Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council welcomes the Rail Action Plan for Kent and wishes to support this document, subject to some additional comments. The Rail Forum staged by the County Council last November was excellent and it put the rail industry, the train operating company, Network Rail and the Department for Transport (DfT) on notice that the County Council, the District Councils and Parish Councils of Kent together with the many rail user groups were all deeply serious and motivated about the next franchise. Between then and now we have had the swingeing increases in fares and the poor performance of Southeastern Railway over the winter period to further reinforce everyone’s intention that next time it will be better and that there will be a sharper focus on the emerging specification for the next franchise and a closer scrutiny of the commissioning process. The draft Plan is admirably comprehensive and pays good attention to the needs of rail passengers in West Kent. The key issues that concern us are well covered. Services on the West Malling/Maidstone line are highlighted. The importance of fares, timetables and service performance are well to the fore. The following comments are not a criticism; just a pointer to what we believe will make the coverage of the document that bit more complete as far as the needs of this area are concerned. • The mention of high speed services on the Medway Valley line is welcome. We should include the need for a stop within this Borough.
    [Show full text]
  • Malling Rd Kent
    MALLING RD KENT (Parishes: Addington, Allington, Aylesford, Birling, Borough Green, Burham, Ditton, East Malling, East Peckham; Ightham, Leybourne, Mereworth, Offham, Platt, Plaxtol, Ryarsh, Shipbourne, Snodland, Stansted, Trottiscliffe, Wateringbury, West Malling, West Peckham, Wouldham and Wrotham) Sources/Coverage: LDS IGI LDS KFHS Other Batch No Addington C(1562-1874) C109981-2 M(1568-1836) M109981-2 Nil Allington C(1630-1874) C109991-2 C(1630-1876) M(1630-1877) M109991-2 M(1640-1877) 1M B(1633-1876) Aylesford C(1635-1861) C036511-3 M(1654-1837) M036511-3 M(1750-1812) 2M Birling C(1558-1874) C130931-2 M(1711-1877) M130932 Nil Burham C(1627-1879) C130951+ M(1626-1876) M130951 Nil Ditton C(1567-99) C131013 C(1633-1885) C131011-2+ M(1665-1837) M131011--4 M(1665-1749) 4C East C(1813-52) C165411 C(1558-1812) Peckham M(1558-1812) B(1558-1812) CD 27 East Malling C(1518-1897) C131581-3+ C(1570-1899) M(1570-1875) M(1570-1901) B(1570-1924) CD 23 Ightam C(1559-1889) C131501-3+ M(1560-1876) M131501-3+ 2C 2M Leybourne C(1560-1875) C131561-2 CMB(1560- 1812) M(1560-1875) M131561-2 Fiche 110 1M LDS IGI LDS KFHS Other Batch No Mereworth C(1560-1897) C135011-3+ CMB(1559- 1812) M(1560-1852) M135011-3 Fiche 117 8C 5M Offham C(1558-1874) C135061-2 M(1538-1852) M135061-2 M(1813-50) Nil Plaxtol C(1805-68) C167161 M(1649-1754) M044409-10 M(1813-35) M167161 Nil Ryarsh C(1560-1876) C017821-4 C(1560-1812) M(1559-1876) M017821-2 M(1560-1811) 2M B(1560-1812) CD 19 Shipbourne C(1560-1682) P015171 C(1719-46) C015172 C(1793-1812) I025034 M(1560-1831) M015171—3+
    [Show full text]
  • Maidstone Area Archaeological Group, Should Be Sent to Jess Obee (Address at End) Or Payments Made at One of the Meetings
    Maidstone Area Archaeological Group Newsletter, March 2000 Dear Fellow Members As there is a host of announcements, I will hold over the Editorial until the next Newsletter, due in May (sighs of relief all round). David Carder Subscriptions and Membership Cards Subscriptions for the year beginning 1st April 2000 are now due. Please use the renewal form enclosed with this Newsletter, and complete as much as of it as possible - that way we can establish what members' interests really are. Return the form with your cheque by post to Jess Obee (address at end), or hand it with cheque or cash to any Committee Member who will give you a receipt. Renewing members will receive a handy Membership Card with the May Newsletter, giving details of indoor meetings, subscription rates, and contacts. In order to comply with the data protection legislation, we have included on the form a consent that your details may be held on a computer database. This data is held purely for membership administration (e.g. printing of address labels and registration of subscription payments). It will not be used for other purposes, or released to outside parties without your express consent. If you have any queries or concerns over this, please write to the Chairman. Notice of Annual General Meeting - Friday 28th April 2000 This year's AGM will be held at 7.30 pm on Friday 28th April 2000 (not 21st as previously published) at the School Hall, The Street, Detling. The Agenda is as follows : 1. Chairman's welcome 2. Apologies for absence 3.
    [Show full text]
  • East Sussex Growth Deal
    East Sussex Growth Deal Uckfield - London Rural Employment Rail Improvements Sites A21 Flimwell Blackfriars, Battle - Robertsbridge Forest Row Wadhurst Upper A22 Hartfield A21 Hastings - Robertsbridge Crowborough Hastings to Ashford Dual Ticehurst Tracking & Electrifications North & East Hailsham Nutley A26 Mayfield Uckfield Town Centre Accessibility Improvement Camber Central Package A272 Car Park Uckfield Burwash Newick Hailsham/Polegate Accessibility Package Heathfield Rye Camber A26 Battle A21 A259 Ditchling Winchelsea Rye Harbour A22 Queensway Gateway Road Lewes Hastings Fairlight A27 Hailsham A259 A23 Kingston North Queensway Polegate Bexhill-on-Sea Hove Pevensey & A26 Westham A27 Bexhill/Hastings Brighton A27 Junction Capacity Alfriston Improvements Saltdean Pevensey Bay Peacehaven Newhaven Cycle Newhaven Improvement Package Priority Quarter Business Bexhill Leisure District Phase 4 Eastbourne Centre Newhaven Ring Road & Local Seaford capacity improvement package Hastings & Bexhill town Initial Feasibility Work centre access & improvement on 5 Sites in hastings Brighton-Peacehaven-Newhaven package Bus Corridor Phase 2 Bexhill/Hastings Hastings & Bexhill LSTF Link Road Newhaven Port A27 Lewes to Polegate Walking & Cycling Package Access Road Phase 1 Improvements Sovereign Harbour Hastings & Bexhill bus access Enterprise Park at Newhaven Port Site 6 improvement package North East Bexhilll Access Road Phase 2 A22/A27 Junction Improvement Package Eastbourne town centre LSTF Phase 2 Elva access & improvement package North Bexhill Newhaven
    [Show full text]
  • Ageing Well: Older People in Tonbridge & Malling Contentscontents
    Ageing Well: Older people in Tonbridge & Malling ContentsContents Overview Demographics Demographics Wellbeing & disease prevalence Wellbeing & disease prevalence Mortality Mortality Healthcare usage Healthcare usage User guide Ageing Well: Older people in Tonbridge & Malling Ageing Well: Older people in Tonbridge and MallingHeath and Social Care Maps POPULATION GROWTH LIFE EXPECTANCY HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS In the 10 years between 2016 and 2026 at age 65 Age 65+ Infographic 65-84 year olds 22.5 years 19.5 + 17.8% years 48% Aged 85+ Elective of admissions Emergency are emergencies Ward-level life expectancy (men) In 2018/19: +31.6% Highest 22.8 Hildenborough Source: ONS population projections 672 admissions MULTIMORBIDITY for falls age 65+, developmental statistics 19.5 Tonbridge & Malling have 2 or more long 18.9 Kent term conditions admissions recorded by their GP for fracture 49% Burham, Eccles & Lowest 14.3 of femur Wouldham 127 Source: KID, 2017 Source: PCMD, 2013-2017 Source: HES Images from Noun project Health and Social Care Maps: 0 Demographics Population numbers: Age 65+ Population projections: Age 65+ Population numbers: Age 85+ Population Numbers: Summary table Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI) Ageing Well: Older people in Tonbridge & Malling Persons aged 65 years and over: by electoral ward Office for National Statistics mid-year estimates, 2018 4,000 3,500 number 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Source: ONS, prepared by KPHO (LLY), Dec-19 Ageing Well: Older people in Tonbridge & Malling Persons aged
    [Show full text]
  • Milepost 37 January 2017 Iii
    MILEPOST 37 JANUARY 2017 III 28 By Chiltern to Oxford – From Page 283 RPS to Oxford – Fromrailway Page performance 283 society www.railperf.org.uk Milepost 37¾ 217 January 2017 Milepost 37¾ - January 2017 The Quarterly Magazine of the Railway Performance Society Honorary President: John Heaton FCILT Commitee: CHAIRMAN Frank Collins 10 Collett Way, Frome, Somerset BA11 2XR Tel: 01373 466408 e-mail [email protected] VICE CHAIRMAN Michael Rowe Burley Cottage, Parson St., Porlock,Minehead, Somerset, TA24 8QJ . Tel 01643 862182 E-mail: [email protected] SECRETARY Frank Price, Penn House, Middle Common Rd., Pennington, Lymington SO41 8LE Tel: 01590 672235 Email: [email protected] TREASURER Peter Smith 28 Downsview Ave, Storrington, W Sussex, RH20 (and membership) 4PS. Tel 01903 742684 e-mail: [email protected] EDITOR David Ashley 92 Lawrence Drive, Ickenham, Uxbridge, Middx, UB10 8RW. Tel 01895 675178 E-mail: [email protected] Distance Chart Editor Ian Umpleby 314 Stainbeck Rd, Leeds, W Yorks LS7 2LR Tel 0113 266 8588 Email: [email protected] Database/Archivist Lee Allsopp 2 Gainsborough, North Lake, Bracknell, RG12 7WL Tel 01344 648644 e-mail [email protected] Technical Officer David Hobbs 11 Lynton Terrace, Acton, London W3 9DX Tel 020 8993 3788 e-mail [email protected] David Stannard 26 Broomfield Close, Chelford, Macclesfield, Cheshire,SK11 9SL. Tel 01625 861172 e mail: [email protected] Meeting Secretary: Michael Bruce, 234A Otley Rd., West Park, Leeds LS16 5AB Tel 0113 305 0367 Committee
    [Show full text]
  • South Eastern Rail Franchise Stakeholder Briefing Document
    Stratford International St Pancras Blackfriars Cannon Street Charing Cross Ebbsfleet Victoria International Waterloo East London Rochester Bridge Margate Canterbury Maidstone Tonbridge Dover Ashford International Folkestone Hastings South Eastern Rail Franchise Stakeholder Briefing Document Shaping the Future November 2017 South Eastern Rail Franchise | Stakeholder Briefing Document 2 South Eastern Rail Franchise Stakeholder Briefing Document Shaping the Future November 2017 The Department for Transport has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Department’s website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact the Department. Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 Website: www.gov.uk/dft General enquiries: https://forms.dft.gov.uk ©Crown copyright 2017 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected] Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Stakeholder Briefing Document | South Eastern Rail Franchise Contents Foreword 1. Foreword by the Transport Secretary 3 Introduction 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonbridge & Malling
    TONBRIDGE & MALLING National Child Measurement Programme: Further Analysis of the Drivers of Excess Weight February 2017 Produced by Val Miller: Public Health Specialist ([email protected]) Wendy Jeffreys: Public Health Specialist ([email protected]) Rachel Kennard: Senior Intelligence Analyst ([email protected]) Zara Cuccu: Public Health Analyst ([email protected]) Correspondence to: Zara Cuccu Version: 01 Last Updated: February 2017 | 1. Background This paper provides a high level summary of the results of in-depth analyses exploring the drivers of excess weight among reception and year six children, a full report has been published. The following analyses of local childhood weight data have also been produced: • Local authority level trend analysis of data up to 2015/16, with comparisons to Kent, the South East and England. • Kent analysis of the inequalities in childhood obesity. The above analyses have established that overweight and obesity prevalence is higher in children resident within areas of deprivation. Further, there is evidence for a widening gap in obesity prevalence between the most and the least deprived groups across Kent during 2008/09 to 2014/15. The following paragraphs summarise the key findings from the full report. Maps have also been presented for the LSOAs in Tonbridge & Malling with the highest levels of excess weight1 across Kent. 1 defined as the upper quartile of excess weight across Kent between 2008/09 to 2014/15 | 2. Ethnicity The association between deprivation and high levels of obesity and excess weight in childhood is well documented. There is also a strong body of evidence indicating that certain ethnic groups are at greater risk of excess weight.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    01 bus time schedule & line map 01 Clare Park View In Website Mode The 01 bus line (Clare Park) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Clare Park: 7:27 AM (2) Peters Village: 3:05 PM - 3:43 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 01 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 01 bus arriving. Direction: Clare Park 01 bus Time Schedule 24 stops Clare Park Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 7:27 AM Community Centre, Peters Village Hall Road, Wouldham Civil Parish Tuesday 7:27 AM Medway Inn, Wouldham Wednesday 7:27 AM Portland Road, Wouldham Civil Parish Thursday 7:27 AM The Watermans Arms, Wouldham Friday 7:27 AM 151 High Street, Wouldham Civil Parish Saturday Not Operational Ferry Lane, Wouldham Medway Inn, Wouldham 2 High Street, Wouldham Civil Parish 01 bus Info Cornwall Crescent, Wouldham Direction: Clare Park Stops: 24 Burham Hill, Burham Trip Duration: 48 min Line Summary: Community Centre, Peters Village, The Windmill, Burham Medway Inn, Wouldham, The Watermans Arms, Rochester Road, Burham Civil Parish Wouldham, Ferry Lane, Wouldham, Medway Inn, Wouldham, Cornwall Crescent, Wouldham, Burham Bell Lane, Burham Hill, Burham, The Windmill, Burham, Bell Lane, Burham, Court Road, Burham, The Red Bull, Eccles, Court Road, Burham Recreation Ground, Eccles, The Friars, Aylesford, High Street, Aylesford, Cemetery, Aylesford, Retail The Red Bull, Eccles Park, Aylesford, Aylesford School, Aylesford, Teapot Lane, Aylesford, Ta Centre, Ditton, Ditton Corner, Recreation Ground, Eccles
    [Show full text]