DOCSLIB.ORG

ON the FLOOR Lyndon Johnson Continued to Take Every Concei

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ON the FLOOR Lyndon Johnson Continued to Take Every Concei CHAPTER 6 "VULTURES" IN THE GALLERIES; "MIRACLES" ON THE FLOOR Lyndon Johnson continued to take every conceivable opportunity to increase the public awareness of civil rights. The president repeatedly linked the bipartisan civil rights bill to Abraham Lincoln and the fact that the nation had recently celebrated, in July l963, the l00th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation. In response to a reporter's question about the civil rights bill at a White House press conference, Johnson said: I hope it is acted upon in the House before the members leave to attend Lincoln Day birthday meetings throughout the nation, because it would be a great tribute to President Lincoln to have that bill finally acted upon in the House before we go out to celebrate his birthday."1 At that same press conference, again in response to a reporter's question, Johnson gave what looked like a "go ahead" for some sort of women's rights amendment to be added to the bipartisan civil rights bill. The transcript of the question and answer read like this: REPORTER: Mr. President, Thursday in the [House] Rules Committee an amendment was offered to include women in the ban on discrimination in the 103 TO END ALL SEGREGATION civil rights bill. That was defeated by one vote and will be brought up again on the floor of the House. In the Democratic platform it says -- and if I may read you just a few words -- "We support legislation which will guarantee to women equality of rights under the law." Would you support an amendment to include women in the civil rights bill? PRESIDENT JOHNSON: I supported that platform and embraced that platform, and stated that view in 43 states in the Union. I realize there has been discrimination in the employment of women, and I am doing my best to do something about it. I am hopeful that in the next month we will have made substantial advances in that field.2 Although the president did not say specifically that he wanted a women's rights amendment added to the civil rights bill, his answer clarified that he was a supporter of the principle of equal rights for women, particularly where equal employment opportunity was concerned. He thus left the option open for the civil rights bill to be amended to ban discrimination on the basis of sex. STRENGTHENING AMENDMENTS? The Leadership Conference on Civil Rights faced a tactical problem as the bipartisan civil rights bill moved to the House floor -- whether to seek strengthening amendments. Up to this point the Leadership Conference's guiding strategy had been that the best defense is a good offense, and there were plenty of strengthening amendments for which to press. The "Mrs. Murphy" loophole could be removed from the public accommodations section. Part III could be amended to permit the attorney general to initiate, not just 104 "VULTURES" IN THE GALLERIES intervene in, civil rights suits. The EEOC provision could be strengthened by permitting administrative rather than judicial enforcement of fair labor practices. At the time the Leadership Conference was considering strengthening amendments, however, there were increasing numbers of news reports and editorial speculations that the bill was going to be dramatically weakened on the House floor, and that EEOC might be amended out of the bill entirely. At a White House meeting on 21 January 1964 President Johnson personally informed Clarence Mitchell, Jr., and Joseph Rauh, Jr., that he opposed any change in the bill, either making it stronger or making it weaker. Rauh described the effect of this meeting with President Johnson on Leadership Conference strategy: Recognizing the unlikelihood of strengthening amendments and the danger in adopting a different strategy on the House floor from that of the administration, the Leadership Conference modified its position to one of opposition to all weakening amendments and reserving decision on strengthening amendments."3 THE HOUSE DEBATE General debate on the civil rights bill began on 31 January l964 and provided the customary opportunities for "flowery" opening remarks. Emanuel Celler offered the following opinion about the prospective enactment of the civil rights bill: [It] will shine in our history. It will bring happiness to 20 million of our people. Civil rights must no longer be merely a beautiful conversation of sweet phrases and pretty sentiments. Civil rights must be the woof and the warp of the life of the nation.4 105 TO END ALL SEGREGATION William McCulloch quickly joined Celler in giving his views on the need for the bill: Not force or fear, . but the belief in the inherent equality of man induces me to support this legis- lation. No one would suggest that the Negro receives equality of treatment and opportunity in many fields of activity today. Hundreds of thousands of citizens are denied the basic right to vote. Thousands of school districts remain segregated. Decent hotel and eating accommodations frequently lie hundreds of miles apart for the Negro traveler. These and many more such conditions point the way toward the need for additional legislation." McCulloch went on to answer what he believed would be the main Southern charge against the civil rights bill -- that it went too far in terms of interfering in the daily lives of the people. "This bill is comprehensive in scope," he pointed out, "yet moderate in application. It is hedged about with effective administrative and legal safeguards." Clarence Brown, the senior Republican on the House Rules Committee, called on his fellow representatives to avoid bitterness and acrimony as they debated the bill. He appealed to House members to "conduct this debate on so high a plane that we can at least say to our children and grandchildren, we participated in one of the great debates of modern American history and we did it as statesmen and not as quarreling individuals." Exactly as Cellar and McCulloch were doing, the Southerners used the same arguments that had been practiced and perfected during the hearings before the House Rules Committee. Rules Committee Chairman Howard Smith once again pointed out that the bill reported out by the House Judiciary Committee had been written at the Kennedy White House and was not the bill that had been debated and 106 "VULTURES" IN THE GALLERIES amended by Judiciary Subcommittee No. 5. He said: The only hearings that were ever held on this bill were held, over the protest of a great many people, before the Committee on Rules. Apparently, nobody who favored this bill wanted the people to know what was in it, . [or what it] proposed to do for 90 percent of the people of this country whose liberties are being infringed upon. What we are considering now is a . monstrosity of unknown origin and unknown parentage . Representative William Colmer of Mississippi attacked the great extent to which the funds cutoff provision of the bill would effect life in local communities throughout the nation. He urged House conservatives, "particularly some of my Republican brethren," to recognize this flaw in the bill: Power would be given not only to the president and the attorney general, but more than that, given to every bureaucrat in the executive department to cut off all federal aid from your hometown, from your county, and from your state. Later in the debate, Emanuel Celler responded to Colmer with a firm defense of the funds cutoff provision: As a matter of simple justice, federal funds, to which taxpayers contribute, ought not to be expended to support or foster discriminatory practices. The toll of the "separate but equal" principle begins at birth. In the segregated hospital, built with federal funds, the chances of survival of a Negro infant or of a Negro mother giving birth in the limited and 107 TO END ALL SEGREGATION inadequate facilities provided to their race, are significantly lower than for whites.5 When the Southern Democrats were not attacking the civil rights bill itself, they turned their attention to the bipartisan coalition supporting the bill. Representative Jamie L. Whitten of Mississippi noted: It is unfortunate that we see an agreement between the Republican leadership over here and the Democratic leadership over there to pass through this House every last bad provision that is in this bill, of which there are hundreds."6 Edwin Willis of Louisiana used almost unchanged the material he had presented before the House Rules Committee. Those who had been present at the Rules Committee hearings heard a second time that the bill was "the most drastic and far-reaching proposal and grab for power ever to be reported out of a committee of the Congress."7 THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE In accordance with normal practice in the House of Represen- tatives, the bipartisan civil rights bill was first considered in the Committee of the Whole. This meant that the entire membership of the House sat as a committee to debate the bill and to amend it. Only two visible changes occur when the House meets as the Committee of the Whole. The mace (the medieval club, topped by an ornamental metal head, used since the Middle Ages to symbolize parliaments, universities, and city governments) is taken down from its mounting, and the speaker of the house is replaced as presiding officer by a member of his choosing. In the early l960s approximately 90 percent of the business of 108 "VULTURES" IN THE GALLERIES the House of Representatives was conducted in the Committee of the Whole. One reason for this was that there was a very lenient quorum rule. Instead of a majority of the House (2l8 members) constituting a quorum, only l00 members needed to be present at the Committee of the Whole.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BOB DOLE Unf Ej States Senate BD: Bj
    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas. http://dolearchives.ku.edu ecember 3, 1970 rs. Christine Stevens, Secretary Society for Animal Protection Legislation P. 0. Box 3719 Washington, D. C. 20007 Dear rs. Stevens: C rtainly thank you for sending me a copy of your Newsletter regarding the Animal Welfare Act of 1970. Very ch appreciate your co ents, and hopefully, we will be successful in expediting passage of this important legislation. In the meanti , if there is any way I may b of assistance, let me know. Sincerely yours, BOB DOLE Unf eJ States Senate BD: bj Page 1 of 6 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas. http://dolearchives.ku.edu · Witittb ~tatts ~tnatt MEMORANDUM Senator Dole---- FYI Mrs. Stevens called last week and I sent your statement. Hyde says she is one of the prime boosters of this bill. She is also the wife of Roger Stevens, who Gyde says runs the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. tag Page 2 of 6 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas. SOCIETY FOR ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEGISLATION http://dolearchives.ku.edu P. 0. Box 3719 Georgetown Station Washington, D. C. 20007 November 30, 1970 Mr. William Taggart Office of Senator Robert Dole Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. Dear Mr. Taggart, Thanks for sending me the Senator's remarks when he introduced the Animal Welfare Act of 1970. I appreciate your getting this off to me in New York. This made it possible to quote Senator Dole in the enclosed circular letter which we have sent out to interested persons throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • 6136 Extensions of Remarks Hon. Emanuel Celler
    6136 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE April 29 Engineers, and other Federal agencies and War I veterans. with reasonable income lim­ PETITIONS, ETC. departments; to the Committee on Public itation provision, but otherwise substantially Works. comparable to pension grants to veterans of Under clause 1 of rule XXII, petitions Also, memorial of the Legislature of the America's wars prior to World War I; to the and papers were laid on the Clerk's desk State of Maine, memorializing the President Committee on Veterans' Affairs. and referred as follows: and the Congress of the United States to 212. By Mr. BUSH: Petition of citizens of correct governmental policies which create South Williamsport, Pa., urging passage of unreasonable competitive disadvantages for PRIVATE BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS H. R. 3029 or any btll which will require the cotton textile industry; to the Commit .. Under clause 1 of rule XXII, private compulsory humane slaughter of animals in tee on Agriculture. packing and slaughter houses throughout Also, a memorial of the Legislature of the bills and resolutions were introduced and the United States; to the Committee on Agri­ State of Nebraska, memorializing the Presi­ severally referred as follows: culture. dent and the Congress of the United States By Mr. ALLEN of California (by 213. Also, additional petition of citizens of approving and supporting the decision of the request): Williamsport, Pa., urging passage of H. R. United States Supreme Court in the school H. R. 7075. A bill for the relief of Emmanuel 3029 or any bill which will require compulsory segregation cases; to the Committee on Edu­ De Leon; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
    [Show full text]
  • Emanuel Celler Papers
    Emanuel Celler Papers A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2012 Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Additional search options available at: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms013038 LC Online Catalog record: http://lccn.loc.gov/mm78051755 Prepared by Lee Johnson with the assistance of Pedro Alvarez Collection Summary Title: Emanuel Celler Papers Span Dates: 1924-1973 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1945-1973) ID No.: MSS51755 Creator: Celler, Emanuel, 1888-1981 Extent: 195,000 items ; 612 containers ; 224.8 linear feet ; 9 microfilm reels Language: Collection material in English Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Summary: Lawyer and U.S. representative from New York. Correspondence, notes, clippings, memoranda, speeches, financial records, printed material, and other papers relating chiefly to Celler's service as representative in Congress from New York and as chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein. People Acheson, Dean, 1893-1971--Correspondence. Barkley, Alben William, 1877-1956--Correspondence. Ben-Gurion, David, 1886-1973--Correspondence. Bowles, Chester, 1901-1986--Correspondence. Byrd, Harry F. (Harry Flood), 1887-1966--Correspondence. Celler, Emanuel, 1888-1981. Couve de Murville, Maurice, 1907-1999--Correspondence. Douglas, William O. (William Orville), 1898-1980--Correspondence. Douglas, William O. (William Orville), 1898-1980. Eaton, Cyrus Stephen, 1883-1979--Correspondence.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    EIGHTY-FIRST CONGRESS JANUARY 3, 1949, TO JANUARY 3, 1951 FIRST SESSION—January 3, 1949, to October 19, 1949 SECOND SESSION—January 3, 1950, to January 2, 1951 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—ALBEN W. BARKLEY, of Kentucky PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—KENNETH D. MCKELLAR, 1 of Tennessee SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—LESLIE L. BIFFLE, 1 of Arkansas SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—JOSEPH C. DUKE, 1 of Arizona SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—SAM RAYBURN, 1 of Texas CLERK OF THE HOUSE—RALPH R. ROBERTS, 1 of Indiana SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—JOSEPH H. CALLAHAN, 1 of Kentucky DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—WILLIAM M. MILLER, 1 of Mississippi POSTMASTER OF THE HOUSE—FINIS E. SCOTT, 1 of Tennessee ALABAMA Wilbur D. Mills, Kensett Helen Gahagan Douglas, Los SENATORS James W. Trimble, Berryville Angeles Lister Hill, Montgomery Boyd Tackett, Nashville Gordon L. McDonough, Los Angeles John J. Sparkman, Huntsville Brooks Hays, Little Rock Donald L. Jackson, Santa Monica Cecil R. King, Los Angeles REPRESENTATIVES W. F. Norrell, Monticello Oren Harris, El Dorado Clyde Doyle, Long Beach Frank W. Boykin, Mobile Chet Holifield, Montebello George M. Grant, Troy CALIFORNIA Carl Hinshaw, Pasadena George W. Andrews, Union Springs SENATORS Harry R. Sheppard, Yucaipa Sam Hobbs, Selma Albert Rains, Gadsden Sheridan Downey, 2 San Francisco John Phillips, Banning Edward deGraffenried, Tuscaloosa Richard M. Nixon, 3 Whittier Clinton D. McKinnon, San Diego Carl Elliott, Jasper William F. Knowland, Piedmont COLORADO Robert E. Jones, Jr., Scottsboro REPRESENTATIVES SENATORS Laurie C. Battle, Birmingham Hubert B. Scudder, Sebastopol Clair Engle, Red Bluff Edwin C.
    [Show full text]
  • Emanuel Celler Collection
    Guide to the Emanuel Celler Collection Brooklyn Public Library Grand Army Plaza Brooklyn, NY 11238 Contact: Brooklyn Collection Phone: 718.230.2762 Fax: 718.857.2245 Email: [email protected] www.brooklynpubliclibrary.org Finding aid prepared by Joy Holland Copyright © 2012 Brooklyn Public Library. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Creator: Emanuel Celler Title: The Emanuel Celler Collection Date Span: 1914-1981 Abstract: The collection consists of four series. Series I: Miscellaneous invitations, honors and other papers Series II: Speeches and other writings by Emanuel Celler Series III: Photographs, legislative bills and other memorabilia Series IV: Bronze bust of Emanuel Celler by Nathan Rapoport Quantity: 7 boxes, 14 unboxed framed items, and one bust Location: Morgue, Shelves 10.4, 10.5, 10.6 Repository: Brooklyn Public Library – Brooklyn Collection Reference Code: BC0212 Biographical History Emanuel Celler was born on May 6, 1888 in a frame house on Sumner Avenue near Floyd St in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, the third of four children. His father owned a “whisky rectifying” business, but when it failed the elder Celler began working as a wine salesman. Emanuel graduated from Boys’ High School in 1906, and after his father’s death took over his wine route, while at the same time studying law at Columbia University. In 1914 he married Stella Baar. The couple had two daughters, one of whom suffered from cerebral palsy. Stella Baar Celler died in 1966. In 1922 Celler was asked if he would like to be the Democratic party’s nominee for Congress in the 10th District, which had thus far never sent a Democrat to Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighty-Ninth Congress January 3, 1965, to January 3, 1967
    EIGHTY-NINTH CONGRESS JANUARY 3, 1965, TO JANUARY 3, 1967 FIRST SESSION—January 4, 1965, to October 23, 1965 SECOND SESSION—January 10, 1966, 1 to October 22, 1966 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—HUBERT H. HUMPHREY, 2 of Minnesota PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—CARL HAYDEN, of Arizona SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—FELTON MCLELLAN JOHNSTON, 3 of Mississippi; EMERY L. FRAZIER, 4 of Kentucky; FRANCIS R. VALEO, 5 of the District of Columbia SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—JOSEPH C. DUKE, 6 of Arizona; ROBERT G. DUNPHY, 7 of Rhode Island SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—JOHN W. MCCORMACK, 8 of Massachusetts CLERK OF THE HOUSE—RALPH R. ROBERTS, 8 of Indiana SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—ZEAKE W. JOHNSON, 8 of Tennessee DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—WILLIAM M. MILLER, 8 of Mississippi POSTMASTER OF THE HOUSE—H. H. MORRIS, 8 of Kentucky ALABAMA Paul J. Fannin, Phoenix John E. Moss, Sacramento SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES Robert L. Leggett, Vallejo John J. Rhodes, Mesa Phillip Burton, San Francisco Lister Hill, Montgomery William S. Mailliard, San Francisco John J. Sparkman, Huntsville Morris K. Udall, Tucson George F. Senner, Jr., Miami Jeffery Cohelan, Berkeley REPRESENTATIVES George P. Miller, Alameda Jack Edwards, Mobile ARKANSAS Don Edwards, San Jose William L. Dickinson, Montgomery Charles S. Gubser, Gilroy George Andrews, Union Springs SENATORS J. Arthur Younger, San Matea Glenn Andrews, Anniston John L. McClellan, Camden Burt L. Talcott, Salinas Armistead I. Selden, Jr., Greensboro J. William Fulbright, Fayetteville Charles M. Teague, Ojai John H. Buchanan, Jr., Birmingham REPRESENTATIVES John F. Baldwin, 12 Martinez James D.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Semitism and American Refugee Immigration Policy During the Holocaust: a Reassessment
    Anti-Semitism and American Refugee Immigration Policy during the Holocaust: A reassessment Sikeli Neil Ratu A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of B.A. (Hons) in History. University of Sydney October 2006 Contents Illustrations 1 Archival abbreviations 2 INTRODUCTION 3 CHAPTER ONE: Nativism on Capitol Hill 6 CHAPTER TWO: Fear and Paranoia in Foggy Bottom 32 CHAPTER THREE: Refugees in the Press 55 CONCLUSION 77 Appendix 79 Bibliography 91 1 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1: To the Conscience of America. 81 Figure 2: Action not pity can save millions now! 82 Figure 3: For sale to Humanity, 70,000 Jews. 83 Figure 4: What is the shocking truth about saving the lives of the European Jews? 84 Figure 5: To 5,000,000 Jews in the Nazi Death-Trap Bermuda was a ‘Cruel Mockery’. 85 Figure 6: They are driven the death daily. 86 Figure 7: Time Races Death. 87 Figure 8: The Conscience of America Speaks! 88 Figure 9: 25 Square miles or 2,000,000 lives. 89 Figure 10: Raise your voice to save millions from Nazi Slaughter! 90 Table 1: Quota–Immigration Numbers: January–June 1941 v. July–December 1941. 53 Table 2: Jewish organisations’ advertisements: by size and publication. 79 Table 3: Jewish organisations’ advertisements: by size and commissioning organisation. 82 2 ARCHIVAL ABBREVIATIONS USED IN NOTES AFSC Archives of the American Friends’ Service Committee FDR Franklin Delano Roosevelt Library NA United States National Archives 3 Introduction In the 1930s and 1940s the United States was confronted with a ‘refugee question’— whether or not to permit Jewish refugee immigration and on what terms—that forced the branches of government and the public to consider carefully their attitudes to immigration and the role America ought to play in humanitarian geo-politics.
    [Show full text]
  • American Zionism and US Foreign Policy
    AMERICAN ZIONISM richard stevens AND U.S. FOREIGN POLICY 1942-1947 .*.*.* • ****** mHHlHi1 » , i “ ^ pjt£ . ****** / J\: * * * /1 '* ' , •■ ‘T'5? • • -r■ ' * THE INSTITUTE FOR PALESTINE STUDIES AMERICAN ZIONISM and U.S. FOREIGN POLICY 1942—1947 by Richard P. Stevens, Ph. D. THE INSTITUTE FOR PALESTINE STUDIES The Institute for Palestine Studies is an independent non-profit Arab research organization not affiliated to any government, political party, or group, devoted to a better understanding of the Palestine problem. Books in the Institute series are published in the interest of public information. They represent the free expression of their authors and do not necessarily indicate the judgement or opinions of the Institute. Copyright © 1962, by Richard P. Stevens First published by Pageant Press, Inc., New York Reprinted by special arrangement by the Institute for Palestine Studies. Copyright © 1970, by the Institute for Palestine Studies, Beirut REPRINT SERIES No. 7. THE INSTITUTE FOR PALESTINE STUDIES Ashqar Bldg., Clemenceau Str., P.O.Box 7164, Beirut, Lebanon NOTE TO SECOND IMPRESSION At the request of the Institute for Palestine Studies the author has kindly given his permission for American Zionism and U.S. Foreign Policy (1942-1947) to be reprinted. To My Parents PREFACE The birth of the State of Israel on May 15, 1948, marked the climax of a vigorous campaign launched some six years earlier by world Zionism in the Biltmore Pro¬ gram. At the Biltmore Conference the Zionists had reason to proclaim openly their political intentions before the American public. Although political Zionism had long pursued the goal of a Jewish state, only the circumstances of modern history compelled the complete unveiling of Zionist intentions.
    [Show full text]
  • Butler Hansen a Trailblazing Washington Politician John C
    Julia Butler Hansen A trailblazing Washington politician John C. Hughes Julia Butler Hansen A trailblazing Washington politician John C. Hughes First Edition Second Printing Copyright © 2020 Legacy Washington Office of the Secretary of State All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-889320-45-8 Ebook ISBN 978-1-889320-44-1 Front cover photo: John C. Hughes Back cover photo: Hansen Family Collection Book Design by Amber Raney Cover Design by Amber Raney and Laura Mott Printed in the United States of America by Gorham Printing, Centralia, Washington Also by John C. Hughes: On the Harbor: From Black Friday to Nirvana, with Ryan Teague Beckwith Booth Who? A Biography of Booth Gardner Nancy Evans, First-Rate First Lady Lillian Walker, Washington State Civil Rights Pioneer The Inimitable Adele Ferguson Slade Gorton, a Half Century in Politics John Spellman: Politics Never Broke His Heart Pressing On: Two Family-Owned Newspapers in the 21st Century Washington Remembers World War II, with Trova Heffernan Korea 65, the Forgotten War Remembered, with Trova Heffernan and Lori Larson 1968: The Year that Rocked Washington, with Bob Young and Lori Larson Ahead of the Curve: Washington Women Lead the Way, 1910-2020, with Bob Young Legacy Washington is dedicated to preserving the history of Washington and its continuing story. www.sos.wa.gov/legacy For Bob Bailey, Alan Thompson and Peter Jackson Julia poses at the historic site sign outside the Wahkiakum County Courthouse in 1960. Alan Thompson photo Contents Preface: “Like money in the bank” 6 Introduction: “Julia Who?” 10 Chapter 1: “Just Plain Me” 17 Chapter 2: “Quite a bit of gumption” 25 Chapter 3: Grief compounded 31 Chapter 4: “Oh! Dear Diary” 35 Chapter 5: Paddling into politics 44 Chapter 6: Smart enough, too 49 Chapter 7: Hopelessly disgusted 58 Chapter 8: To the last ditch 65 Chapter 9: The fighter remains 73 Chapter 10: Lean times 78 Chapter 11: “Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • The .Amal.Gama:Ted Sugar Ccmpany C
    UNITED STATES BEET SUGAR ASSOCIATION WASHINGTON - April 28, 1967 MEMORAN.llJM TO INWSTRY PUBLIC RELATIONS COMMITI'EE Ernest Haycox, Jr. - The .Amal.gama:ted Sugar Ccmpany c. w. Briggs - .American Crysta.l Sugar Cam:paey James Yuenger - Buckeye Sugars, Inc. Tan Ferril - The Great Western Sugar Campany Francis L. Kafka - Holly Sugar Corporation Dave Roche - Michigan Sugar Company c. A. Coryell, Jr. - Monitor Sugar Company Margaretta Carey - The National Sugar Manufacturing Company L'e.ve Carter - Spreckels Sugar Company Alden L. Stock - Union Sugar Division Keith J. Wallentine - Utah-Idaho Sugar Company John McGill - Farmers & Manufacturers Beet Sugar Association Here are a couple of things that may be of same help or at least of some interest. (1) 1967 Congressional Handbook, issued by the Legislative Depart­ ment of the Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. Lists members of both houses a.lphabetically as well as by states, and also lists all standing ccmnittees, and the Senate and House leadership. Not so comprehensive as the regular Congressional Directory, of course, but can be, is handy for quick reference or mailing lists •••••• Incidentally the new regular Congressional Directory is now available. May be purchased from Superintendent of Documents, U.s. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 -- $3.50 for regular edition, $5.00 for thumb-indexed {much quicker to use). Ask for "Congressiona.l Directory, 90th Congress, First Session." Bears March 1967 date. {Or maybe you have already received a copy from your Senator or Congressman.) (2) Reprint of article on the so-called world sugar market from January, 1967, issue of Sugar il.
    [Show full text]
  • Onto the National Stage
    Onto the National Stage congresswomen in an age of crises, 1935–1954 Thirty-six women entered Congress between 1935 and 1954, a tumultuous two decades that encompassed the Great Depression, World War II, and the start of the Cold War. Women participated in America’s survival, recovery, and ascent to world power in important and unprecedented ways; they became shapers of the welfare state, workers during wartime, and members of the military. During this time the nation’s capital took on increasing importance in the everyday lives of average Americans. The Great Depression and the specter of global war transformed the role of the federal government, making it a provider and protector. Like their male counterparts, women in Congress legislated to provide economic relief to their constituents, debated the merits of government intervention to cure the economy, argued about America’s role in world affairs, and grappled with challenges and opportunities during wartime. Distinct trends persisted from the pioneer generation of women in Congress. Second-generation women still made up only a small fraction of the total congres- sional membership. At their peak, 15 women served in the 83rd Congress Senators Joseph T. Robinson (far left) and Hattie W. Caraway of Arkansas at the June 1936 Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, at which President Franklin Roosevelt was nominated to a second term. Caraway was a supporter of the Roosevelt administration’s New Deal economic recovery programs, many of which benefited constituents in her agriculture-based state. image courtesy of the national archives and records administration (1953–1955)—about 2.8 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Talking Trump and the Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Correcting the Record on Section 4 Joel K
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Saint Louis University School of Law Research: Scholarship Commons Saint Louis University School of Law Scholarship Commons All Faculty Scholarship 2018 Talking Trump and the Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Correcting the Record on Section 4 Joel K. Goldstein Saint Louis University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/faculty Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation Goldstein, Joel K., Talking Trump and the Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Correcting the Record on Section 4. Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 21, no.1, 2018. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. TALKING TRUMP AND THE TWENTY-FIFTH AMENDMENT: CORRECTING THE RECORD ON SECTION 4 Joel K. Goldstein* ABSTRACT The first year of the presidency of Donald J. Trump brought attention to Section 4 of the Twenty-fifth Amendment, the constitutional provision that allows the Vice President and a Cabinet majority to transfer presidential powers and duties from a President who is “unable to discharge the powers and duties” of his office. Although the ensuing media discussion included many thoughtful contributions, it also produced many mistaken assertions by scholars, journalists and other commentators regarding the importance, scope, operation, and effect of Section 4. These mistakes are troubling because they may produce enduring misunderstanding regarding a provision designed to handle some of the most challenging, traumatic and contentious contingencies that might arise involving an incapacitated President and the transfer of presidential powers and duties to the Vice President.
    [Show full text]