RCSIsmjstaff review

The state of mental health among Irish prisoners

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Student Medical Journal 2012; 5: 78-80.

Introduction and, following evidence provided by a consultant The goal of penal institutions is to correct behaviour psychiatrist: (1) have been found to have been that violates established societal norms. Those who suffering from a mental disorder at the time; and, (2) deviate from these norms must serve a prison that the mental disorder was such that the accused sentence, the duration of which is appropriately did not understand the nature of the act, did not matched to the severity of their crime, as a know it was wrong or was unable to refrain from deterrence from re-offending. However, when we committing the act. Following this verdict, it can be send offenders with psychiatric comorbidities to decided whether the person is in need of acute traditional penal institutions, they do not receive the inpatient care at a designated centre. Currently, the medical care they require. This negates the goal of Central Mental Hospital (CMH) in Dundrum is the penal system, as behaviour cannot be corrected Ireland’s only designated centre, meaning that via imprisonment when the root cause of the anyone convicted under the stipulations of the 2010 criminal act is not corrected. Forensic psychiatry is Act is sent to this facility. Additionally, the 2010 Act the medical specialty that deals with individuals with contains a provision that applies only to persons who mental disorders who demonstrate antisocial or commit murder while suffering from a mental violent behaviour.1 By failing to address the disorder. Under this section, it is possible that the psychiatric needs of this forensic population while accused person’s mental disorder would justify a they are incarcerated, we see higher rates of verdict of diminished responsibility. In such a case, recidivism and unnecessary stresses on the prison the accused may be tried for manslaughter and sent system.2 A recent study conducted by Linehan et al. to an appropriate psychiatric facility if found guilty, as indicates that psychiatric morbidity in Irish prisons opposed to being tried for murder, which bears a greatly surpasses that of international rates.3 This mandatory life sentence if the verdict is guilty. Under study, combined with a revealing report by the the 2010 Act, any patient admitted to the CMH has European Committee for the Prevention of Torture their detention reviewed at regular intervals never and Degrading Treatment (CPT),2 has made it clear exceeding six months. The Mental Health (Criminal that the Irish prison system is failing our offenders Law) Review Board determines whether the patient with psychiatric illnesses in a number of critical areas. continues to require acute treatment, should be This article will provide an overview of the Irish detained in a designated centre, or can be criminal justice system’s approach to convicting the discharged (unconditionally or subject to terms it mentally ill, address the problems with this system as deems appropriate). If the patient remains detained laid out by the CPT, and discuss the steps taken by in a designated facility for the duration of their prison the Irish Government to improve their penal system sentence, they are subject to psychiatric review with respect to both the mentally ill and the safety of before their release. If the Review Board believes that the public. the patient would benefit from further mental health treatment, he/she may be retained within the Implications of the Criminal Law psychiatric prison system. Alternatively, if the medical (Insanity) Act 2010 officer deems that the patient is no longer in need of The act that currently governs sentencing for Irish inpatient care prior to the completion of their criminals suffering from mental health issues is the sentence, they may be transferred to a regular Criminal Law (Insanity) Act of 2010.4 When prison. One would assume that the introduction of establishing guilt and determining an appropriate the not guilty by reason of insanity plea would prison sentence, it takes into account a person’s decrease the prevalence of patients with psychiatric Sarah Pilon mental state at the time the crime in question was comorbidities in regular prisons.5 However, it appears RCSI medical student committed. Under this Act, the accused may be that the courts have not sufficiently made use of this judged not guilty by reason of insanity. This verdict is Act. Offenders with psychiatric illnesses are still reserved for persons who have committed a crime frequently sent to regular prisons, perhaps owing to

Page 78 | Volume 5: Number 1. 2012 RCSIsmjstaff review

the lack of secure regional psychiatric facilities.6 Recent cross-sectional their release from solitary confinement in order to reduce the studies have concluded that the six-month prevalence of mental illness is psychological trauma of the experience and to restore the doctor-patient 1.8% among fixed sentence prisoners, 6.1% in prisoners serving a life relationship. A debriefing is a process where open discussion is sentence4 and 7.6% among remand prisoners – that is, those who are encouraged between the staff and patients regarding the reason for detained in prison while awaiting further sentencing.1 While the first two isolation. The goals of debriefings are to achieve mutual understanding of values were similar to internationally established rates, the rate of the event by staff and patient alike, and to identify those patients in need psychiatric comorbidities in Irish remand prisoners is twice that of of follow-up care.13 The CPT noted that proper procedure was not international rates.7 always observed at the CMH as debriefings were not always offered following the use of restraints or isolation.2 Poor communication avenues Review of the Irish prison system by the European between the medical and legal systems put offenders with psychiatric Committee for the Prevention of Torture illnesses at even further disadvantage, to the extent that many may arrive The challenges that mentally ill offenders face are exacerbated by a lack at the prison with little or no knowledge about their mental disorder and of adequate funding. A number of hazards and inadequacies were medical needs.11 In an attempt to address this shortcoming, mental identified by the CPT in a 2011 report addressed to the Irish health in-reach teams from the CMH are sent to Irish prisons to help Government.2 address the medical needs of prisoners with chronic mental illness.14

Inadequate facilities and healthcare ‘A Vision for Change’ and further solutions Inadequate funding of the Irish prison system has led to a delay in the In 2006, the Irish Government recognised the need to improve implementation of much-needed and substantial renovations to the psychiatric services for prisoners, and released a report entitled ‘A Vision nation’s largest prisons. A rise in the number of convicted persons has for Change’, which detailed the Government’s comprehensive policy not been met by increased capacity, resulting in gross overcrowding. It framework for mental health services for the next decade.15 The report was noted in the CPT report that many cells originally designed for single was released by an expert panel spearheaded by former Tánaiste and occupancy were housing three prisoners in Cork; in Limerick, many Minister for Health and Children Mary Harney, and Minister of State in inmates were sleeping two to a bed.2 This regrettable situation was made the Department of Health and Children Tim O’Malley TD. One of the worse by a lack of hygienic facilities. The CPT noted that one-quarter of, major objectives of the policy framework was to see forensic psychiatric or nearly 1,000, prisoners were without adequate toilet facilities and were patients treated in full compliance with the standards set by the Mental required to ‘slop out’ – a degrading situation where the prisoner uses a Health Act of 2001.14,16 This panel also recognised the need for the chamber pot that is removed at the end of each day.2 Both expansion of court diversion systems. Diversion systems, in the interest of overcrowding and the presence of biohazardous waste are particularly public safety, allow for the placement of people charged with a crime harmful to mentally ill prisoners. Overcrowding has led to the forced associated with an underlying mental illness in a facility to receive integration of mentally ill and regular offenders, which may contribute to treatment and serve the penalty for their offence. This facilitates the early increased rates of suicide and violence within the prison system.8,9 identification of mental health problems and places emphasis on Remaining confined to a cell in the presence of biohazardous waste is treatment, thus decreasing the risk of recidivism.6 A 2002 study funded not only dehumanising, but also poses a health risk to all those involved. by the United Kingdom’s Research, Development and Statistics Moreover, prisoners who are mentally ill may not recognise the inherent Directorate of the Home Office concluded that the reconviction rate of risk associated with these poor living conditions, putting them at an even those who had been admitted to psychiatric hospitals from courts was greater health risk.10 half that of age- and offence-matched mentally ill offenders who were sent to prison.17 In light of this fact, 103 offenders were diverted from Inadequate psychiatric care the courts or prisons to appropriate community or general psychiatric Given the current state of disrepair of and disorganisation within the Irish facilities in 2009, and this number has increased in recent years.14 prison system, it is not surprising that the additional health and safety To allow for appropriate referral of this population, it is necessary to needs of mentally ill offenders often go unmet. Prisons are not expand the capacity of the CMH and develop new facilities. Crichton appropriate institutions for the mentally ill because there is only a certain argues that developing the infrastructure to accommodate offenders with standard of care that can be provided on a large scale in prisons. For psychiatric illnesses is in the interests of society as a whole, stating that example, prison staff receive limited training in psychiatry.11 As such, the “secure psychiatric facilities will facilitate appropriate treatment for irrational and often violent behaviour of psychiatric patients may be patients and will protect the wider community”.18 The Irish Government perceived as the intentional aggression of a mentally competent prisoner, has developed plans to establish a new forensic mental health facility to leading to the routine disciplining of behaviour that would best be replace the CMH in response to the increasing forensic psychiatric treated medically.11 The Mental Health Commission has detailed rules population. Initial plans to relocate this facility to a site in close proximity and restrictions regarding the sanctioned use of isolation and mechanical to the Thornton Hall prison were cancelled following protests from restraints.12 However, the CPT noted instances where isolation was used mental health advocacy groups.19 At time of going to press, a project as a punishment following mentally ill behaviour.2 The CPT also team has been assembled, but no details have been released regarding recommended the provision of debriefing services to patients following the hospital’s completion date.20 The Irish Government has also

Volume 5: Number 1. 2012 | Page 79 RCSIsmjstaff review

recognised the need to improve the prison discharge programme to specifically with respect to the development of a new forensic centre for allow for a safer transition of prisoners with psychiatric illnesses from their mental health, casts doubts on the feasibility of the ten-year timeline set detention facilities to structured community facilities. Edgar and Rickford out in the policy framework. The most recent review of the policy, in July make the case for meeting such demands, arguing that: “When 2011, emphasised the need for continued improvement.21 Many mental vulnerable people are released from prison with no after-care health services across Ireland continue to have no collaborative referral arrangement in place, the predictable outcome is that the person is often and discharge protocol in place with primary care teams. Several of these returned to face a subsequent prison sentence”.11 Community same mental health centres do not have individualised patient infrastructure and support systems must be reworked to accommodate management, and even lack guidelines for assessing and managing those the social re-integration and medical needs of offenders with psychiatric deemed to be at a high risk of suicidal or violent behaviour.21 Moreover, illnesses. the majority of psychiatric facilities across the country have witnessed little or no increase in their budget since the release of the ‘A Vision for Conclusion Change’ policy six years ago.22 Advocacy and spotlighting of the issues The CPT has identified several critical issues in the areas of inconsistent related to the mental health of Irish prisoners needs to be augmented healthcare, shortage of facilities, inhumane living conditions and and maintained to ensure that current economic pressures do not take inadequate psychiatric care, all of which need to be resolved to better precedence over the basic human needs and healthcare requirements of serve the needs of mentally ill prisoners. The initiatives outlined in the these individuals. The CPT is scheduled to re-evaluate Irish prisons this Irish Government’s 2006 ‘A Vision for Change’ policy document are year, and one can only hope that the situation of Irish prisoners with necessary and commendable. However, the delay in follow through, mental health disorders has improved.

References

1. Gordon H, Lindquist P. Forensic psychiatry in Europe. Psychiatric Bulletin. 12. Mental Health Commission. The Use of Seclusion, Mechanical Means of 2007;31:421-4. Bodily Restraint and Physical Restraint in Approved Centres: Activities Report 2. Report to the on the visit to Ireland carried out by 2009. Dublin; Mental Health Commission, January 2011. 56p. the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or 13. Needham H, Sands N. Post-seclusion debriefing: a core nursing Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 25 January to 5 February intervention. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2010;46(3): 221-33. 2010. Strasbourg: 14. Response of the Government of Ireland to the report of the European Council of Europe; February 10, 2011. 88p. Report No.: CPT/Inf (2011) 3. Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading 3. Linehan S, Duffy D, Wright B, Curtin K, Monks S, Kennedy H. Psychiatric Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Ireland from 25 January to 5 morbidity in a cross-sectional sample of male remanded prisoners. Ir J Psych February 2010. Strasbourg: Council of Europe; February 10, 2011. 78 p. Med. 2005;22(4):28-132. Report No.: CPT/Inf (2011) 4. 4. Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2010. Dublin: ; December 22, 2010. 15. Goverment of Ireland. A Vi sion for Change: Report of the Expert Group on 11p. Report No.:40. Mental Health Policy. Dublin; The Stationery Office, 2006. Cited October 5. Duffy D, Linehan S, Kennedy H. Psychiatric morbidity in the male sentenced 10, 2011. Available from: http://hse.ie/eng/services/Publications Irish prisons population. Ir J Psych Med. 2006;23(2):54-62. /services/Mentalhealth/Mental_Health_-_A_Vision_for_Change.pdf. 6. Irish Prison Service. Prisoner Healthcare [Internet]. 2009. Updated June 27, 16. Mental Health Act, 2001. Dublin; Oireachtas, 2001. 53p. Report No.:25. 2011; cited July 15, 2011. Available from: http://www.irishprisons.ie/ 17. James D, Farnham F, Moorey H, Lloyd H, Hill K, Blizard R et al. Outcome of care_and_rehabilitation-prisoner_healthcare.htm. psychiatric admission through the courts – RDS Occasional Paper. London; 7. Mental Health Commission. Forensic Mental Health Services For Adults in The Home Office, 2002. 144p. Report No.:79. Ireland – Position Paper. Dublin; Mental Health Commission, February 2011. 18. Crichton, J. Defining high, medium and low security in forensic mental 65p. healthcare: the development of the matrix of security in Scotland. J Forens 8. Stationery Office. Report of the National Steering Group on Deaths in Psychiatry Psychol. 2009;20(3):333-53. Prisons. Dublin; Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform, 1999. 19. The Central Mental Hospital Carers’ Group. Patients Not Prisoners – Report 41p. on the Central Mental Hospital Round Table Meeting. Dublin; Irish Mental 9. Dooley E. Prison suicide – politics and prevention: a view from Ireland. Health Coalition, January 30, 2008. Crisis. 1997;18(4):185-9. 20. Lynch P. The plight of the forgotten hospitals. [Internet]. 10. Nurse J, Woodcock P. Influence of environmental factors on mental health April 26, 2011. Cited August 20, 2011. Available from: http:// within prisons: focus group study. BMJ. 2003;327(7413):480. www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/health/2011/0426/1224295454429.html. 11. Edgar K, Rickford D. Too little too late: an independent review of unmet 21. A Vi sion for Change: Advancing Mental Health in Ireland. Survey Results July mental health need in prison [monograph online]. London; Prison Reform 2011. Health Service Executive. Cited October 10, 2011. Available from: Trust, 2009. Cited July 15, 2011. Available from: http://hse.ie/eng/services/Find_a_Service/Mental_Health_

http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/PressPolicy/News/ItemId/33/vw/1. Services/VisionforChange/.

Page 80 | Volume 5: Number 1. 2012