DOCSLIB.ORG

12 Feeding Ecology of Piscivorous Fishes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

12 Feeding Ecology of Piscivorous Fishes FRANCIS JUANES, JEFFREY A . BUCKEL AND FREDERICK S . SCHARF 12 .1 INTRODUCTION group, however, are difficult to categorize and describe, which perhaps explains why no reviews Fish exhibit tremendous diversity in feeding of their ecology exist . habits and the morphologies associated with feeding. A recent book (Gerking 1994) and various other overviews of fish feeding exist (Wootton 12 .2 ADAPTATIONS FOR 1990; Hobson 1991 ; Hart 1993) . However, most of PISCIVORY these tend to be general reviews of theory or focus 12.2.1 What is a piscivore? on smaller non-piscivorous fishes . Our intent here is to review the feeding ecology of piscivorous fish, We define piscivorous fish as carnivorous fish that a subject which to our knowledge has never previ- consume primarily fish prey. Most fish species are ously been reviewed . We focus on teleost fish, and opportunistic and flexible in their feeding habits on species and sizes that consume juvenile and (Dill 1983) and no species consumes only fish prey; adult prey and do not consider those that feed pri- however many do ingest fish as the main prey marily on larvae or fish eggs . item. Fish that eat other fish are second in propor- tion to those feeding on benthic invertebrates and are present in a variety of freshwater, estuarine 12.1.1 Whypiscivorous fish? and marine systems . They are equally common in Piscivorous fish are broadly distributed phyloge- tropical and temperate ecosystems . Keast (1985) netically and geographically, occur in most habi- examined the piscivore feeding guild of small lakes tats and generally occupy the top of most aquatic and streams and categorized piscivorous fish into trophic webs. Piscivorous fish also generally primary and secondary piscivores . Primary or achieve the largest body size within fish com- 'specialized' piscivores shift to piscivory within munities, are represented by some of the largest the first few months of life, whereas secondary pis- species (many elasmobranchs, tunas, billfishes) civores only become fish-eaters later in life . Keast and have potentially large impacts on their com- further suggests that secondary piscivores switch munities through predation . Finally, many pisci- to fish as a way to maintain energetic efficiency vorous fishes, because of their ubiquity and large as they grow. This can only be achieved by eating body size are among the most valuable harvestable progressively larger prey and, at a certain point, species in many of the world's fisheries . In some fish are the only prey available . Furthermore, sec- cases, they compete with humans for commer- ondary piscivores are not structurally adapted for cially important resource species (V . Christensen piscivory other than acquiring a large mouth as 1996; Buckel et al . 1999a) . Piscivorous fish as a they age . 268 Chapter 12 12.2.2 What are the adaptations strikes occur at high speed and missed prey are for piscivory? rarelypursued, or they can be pursuers such as trout (Salmo trutta ), where attacks start from a C-shaped Feeding behaviours and position, strikes occur at low speeds from a short morphological adaptations distanceand missed prey are chased. When observed in detail it becomes clear that pis- civore feeding behaviour is complex and flexible in Ambush This strategy is used by species that dealing with different prey types . Behaviours can attack from seclusion, although an element of generally be grouped into the following categories, chasing may also occur. Examples are morays which are also associated with particular morpho- (Muraenidae), pike (Esocidae) and summer floun- logical adaptations . der (Pleuronectidae) . Few morphological similar- ities exist in species that use this behaviour other Luring Luring is a sit-and-wait behaviour where than the ability to use camouflage and high-speed prey are attracted by a 'lure', which consists of a attacks. However, distinct patterns of kinematic, stalk topped by a device that resembles a source of pressure, electromyographic and behavioural pro- food; the lure is a modification of the first dorsal files of prey capture are exhibited by ambushers spine (Gerking 1994) . Luring is typical of the an- andpursuers . glerfish (order Lophiiformes) . In addition, among the frogfish various morphological features allow Other A variety of other rarer feeding habits each the predator to blend into the rocky environments with their own specialized morphologies, particu- in which they live as a form of camouflage. Angler- larly in the dentition, include forms of parasitism fish have a considerable gape and ingest prey sizes such as blood-sucking in lampreys (Petromyzonti- that are large compared to other piscivores . dae) and catfishes (Trichomycteridae and Cetopsi- dae), scale-eating in many cichlids and characoids, Stalking Stalking is the unobtrusive pursuit of and fin and eye-biting (Gerking 1994 . prey before the attack occurs . This strategy is com- A novel feeding behaviour common to plankti- mon to trumpetfish (Aulostomidae), longnose gar vores has recently been observed for a few species (Lepisosteidae) and needlefish (Belonidae) . These of piscivores (Sazima 1998) . Ram suspension (or species have similar morphologies, long slender filter) feeding is defined as swimming through the bodies with a long snout and sharp teeth . water with the mouth wide open and opercles flared as a way of filtering small prey items out of Chasing Large piscivores are able to chase and the water column without directing attacks to- 'swim-down' prey. This strategy is best represented wards individual prey. This may be a mechanism by the billfish (Xiphiidae and Istiophoridae) and used by piscivores feeding on relatively small prey some tuna (Scombridae) andyellowtail orpompano in high concentrations (B . Hanrahan and F. Juanes, (Carangidae) . These fish must be able to attain personal observation( . high cruising and accelerating speeds . Their bodies can be described as thunniform or carangiform, Most piscivores ingest their prey whole . A few where thrust is maximized by a lunate tail with a species are able to tear off and ingest pieces and high aspect ratio, a narrow caudal peduncle that good examples are piranhas (Serrasalmus spp .) minimizes sideways thrust and a large anterior and African tiger fish (Hydrocyon vittatus) . The body depth that minimizes recoil of the head end . most detailed analysis of partial prey eating has These same features, along with a relatively rigid been performed for bluefish (Pomatomus and streamlined body, also minimize drag (see saltatrix) (Juanes and Conover 1994a ; Scharf et al . Brix, Chapter4, this volume . Chasers canbe either 1997). Juvenile bluefish switch from taking prey Jungers, such as the pike (Esox spp . ), where attacks whole to partial prey consumption when the prey are startedat close range from an S-shaped position, to predator size ratio is about 0.35 independent of Feeding EcologyofPiscivorous Fishes 269 prey type (Scharf et al . 1997( . This ability allows length, has a fineness ratio between 3 .5 and 5 .0 bluefish to attack much larger prey sizes than can (Juanes et al . 1994) . Interestingly, offshore inverte- predators of similar size and is likely to be a func- brate-feeding juveniles (<40 mm) are already mor- tion of specialized musculature and dentition. phologically specialized for piscivory, suggesting Bluefish are also unique in that they ingest prey a trade-off between feeding efficiency and future tail-first, whereas most other piscivores that have diet. A result of this trade-off may be to accelerate been examined eat prey head-fast . Tail-first inges- the onset of piscivory. tion may be a result of pursuing prey rather than ambushing it, or a way to reduce prey mobility Life history thereby increasing prey vulnerability, as has been observed in piranhas . Onset of piscivory Most piscivorous fish under- go ontogenetic shifts in diet (Werner and Gilliam 1984; Keast 1985 ; Winemiller 1989) . These shifts Schoolingin predators generally progress from consumption of zooplank- Schooling by prey is generally thought of as an ton to consumption of benthic macrofauna or prey adaptation for evading, confusing and reducing the fish, with a concomitant increase in mean prey efficiency of predators (Pitcher and Parrish 1993 . size as predators grow . There is much variation in Schooling also has hydrodynamic and foraging the timing of the shift to piscivory among primary functions . Little empirical work has been done on and secondary piscivores (Mittelbach and Persson whether schooling by predators enhances preda- 1998; Mittelbach, Chapter 11, this volume) . A tion efficiency in piscivores . Field studies have few species of scombrids apparently forgo the shown that, in general, group attacks tend to result zooplanktivorous stage and start eating fishes at in higher capture success rates (Pitcher and Parrish first feeding, whereas others shift early in the 1993). Eklov (1992) has shown that the foraging larval period (Tanaka et al . 1996) . The shift to efficiency, measured as growth rate, varies be- piscivory invariably results in an increase in pre- tween a group-foraging, actively searching pisci- dator growth rate (Buijse and Houthuijzen 1992 ; vore (Eurasian perch, Perca fluviatilis) and a Juanes and Conover 1994b, Olson 1996) . Among solitary-foraging, stalking piscivore (pike, Esox the scombrids studiedby Tanaka et al . (1996, there lucius) . Under similar conditions, grouped perch was a direct correlation between the
Recommended publications
  • Functional Responses of Fish Communities to Environmental Gradients in the North Sea, Eastern English Channel, and Bay of Somme Matthew Mclean

    Functional Responses of Fish Communities to Environmental Gradients in the North Sea, Eastern English Channel, and Bay of Somme Matthew Mclean

    Functional responses of fish communities to environmental gradients in the North Sea, Eastern English Channel, and Bay of Somme Matthew Mclean To cite this version: Matthew Mclean. Functional responses of fish communities to environmental gradients in the North Sea, Eastern English Channel, and Bay of Somme. Ecology, environment. Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale, 2019. English. NNT : 2019DUNK0532. tel-02384271 HAL Id: tel-02384271 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02384271 Submitted on 28 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Thèse de doctorat de L’Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale Ecole doctorale – Sciences de la Matière, du Rayonnement et de l’Environnement Pour obtenir le grade de Docteur en sciences et technologies Spécialité : Géosciences, Écologie, Paléontologie, Océanographie Discipline : BIOLOGIE, MEDECINE ET SANTE – Physiologie, biologie des organismes, populations, interactions Functional responses of fish communities to environmental gradients in the North Sea, Eastern English Channel, and Bay of Somme Réponses fonctionnelles des communautés de poissons aux gradients environnementaux en mer du Nord, Manche orientale, et baie de Somme Présentée et soutenue par Matthew MCLEAN Le 13 septembre 2019 devant le jury composé de : Valeriano PARRAVICINI Maître de Conférences à l’EPHE Président Raul PRIMICERIO Professeur à l’Université de Tromsø Rapporteur Camille ALBOUY Cadre de Recherche à l’IFREMER Examinateur Maud MOUCHET Maître de Conférences au CESCO Examinateur Rita P.
  • Consumption Impacts by Marine Mammals, Fish, and Seabirds on The

    Consumption Impacts by Marine Mammals, Fish, and Seabirds on The

    83 Consumption impacts by marine mammals, fish, and seabirds on the Gulf of Maine–Georges Bank Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) complex during the years 1977–2002 W. J. Overholtz and J. S. Link Overholtz, W. J. and Link, J. S. 2007. Consumption impacts by marine mammals, fish, and seabirds on the Gulf of Maine–Georges Bank Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) complex during the years 1977–2002. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64: 83–96. A comprehensive study of the impact of predation during the years 1977–2002 on the Gulf of Maine–Georges Bank herring complex is presented. An uncertainty approach was used to model input variables such as predator stock size, daily ration, and diet composition. Statistical distributions were constructed on the basis of available data, producing informative and uninformative inputs for estimating herring consumption within an uncertainty framework. Consumption of herring by predators tracked herring abundance closely during the study period, as this important prey species recovered following an almost complete collapse during the late 1960s and 1970s. Annual consumption of Atlantic herring by four groups of predators, demersal fish, marine mammals, large pelagic fish, and seabirds, averaged just 58 000 t in the late 1970s, increased to 123 000 t between 1986 and 1989, 290 000 t between 1990 and 1994, and 310 000 t during the years 1998–2002. Demersal fish consumed the largest proportion of this total, followed by marine mammals, large pelagic fish, and seabirds. Sensitivity analyses suggest that future emphasis should be placed on collecting time-series of diet composition data for marine mammals, large pelagic fish, and seabirds, with additional monitoring focused on the abundance of seabirds and daily rations of all groups.
  • Size-Based Responses of Prey to Piscivore Exclusion in a Species-Rich Neotropical River

    Size-Based Responses of Prey to Piscivore Exclusion in a Species-Rich Neotropical River

    Ecology, 85(5), 2004,pp. 1311-1320 @ 2004 by the Ecological Society of America SIZE-BASED RESPONSES OF PREY TO PISCIVORE EXCLUSION IN A SPECIES-RICH NEOTROPICAL RIVER CRAIG A. LAYMAN! AND KIRK O. WINEMILLER Section of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, 210 Nagle Hall, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2258 USA Abstract. Characteristics used to group species, and thus generalize ecological inter': actions, can aid in constructing predictive models in species-rich food webs. We tested whether size could be used to predict a behavioral response of multiple prey species (n > 50) to exclusion of large-bodied fishes, including seven abundant piscivore species, in a lowland Neotropical river. A randomized block design (n = 6) included three experimental treatments constructed on sandbank habitats: large fish exclusion, cage control (barrier with gaps), and natural reference plot (no barrier). Exclosures prevented passage of all large- bodied fishes, but the mesh size allowed passage of prey fishes. After two weeks, exper- imental areas were sampled once during the day and once at night. Total abundance of prey fishes was not significantly different among treatments, and effects on specie~density were variable. Analyses based on fish size class, however, demonstrated significant size- based effects of large-fish exclusion. Abundance of medium fishes (40-110 mm) in exclu. sion treatments increased significantly relative to controls in day (248%) and night (91 %) samples, and this trend was apparent for many species (n > 13). Species density of medium fishes increased significantly in exclusion treatments. There was evidence of an intraspecific, size-dependent response for the three most common species.
  • A Review of Planktivorous Fishes: Their Evolution, Feeding Behaviours, Selectivities, and Impacts

    A Review of Planktivorous Fishes: Their Evolution, Feeding Behaviours, Selectivities, and Impacts

    Hydrobiologia 146: 97-167 (1987) 97 0 Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Netherlands A review of planktivorous fishes: Their evolution, feeding behaviours, selectivities, and impacts I Xavier Lazzaro ORSTOM (Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pour le Développement eri Coopération), 213, rue Lu Fayette, 75480 Paris Cedex IO, France Present address: Laboratorio de Limrzologia, Centro de Recursos Hidricob e Ecologia Aplicada, Departamento de Hidraulica e Sarzeamento, Universidade de São Paulo, AV,DI: Carlos Botelho, 1465, São Carlos, Sï? 13560, Brazil t’ Mail address: CI? 337, São Carlos, SI? 13560, Brazil Keywords: planktivorous fish, feeding behaviours, feeding selectivities, electivity indices, fish-plankton interactions, predator-prey models Mots clés: poissons planctophages, comportements alimentaires, sélectivités alimentaires, indices d’électivité, interactions poissons-pltpcton, modèles prédateurs-proies I Résumé La vision classique des limnologistes fut de considérer les interactions cntre les composants des écosystè- mes lacustres comme un flux d’influence unidirectionnel des sels nutritifs vers le phytoplancton, le zoo- plancton, et finalement les poissons, par l’intermédiaire de processus de contrôle successivement physiqucs, chimiques, puis biologiques (StraSkraba, 1967). L‘effet exercé par les poissons plaiictophages sur les commu- nautés zoo- et phytoplanctoniques ne fut reconnu qu’à partir des travaux de HrbáEek et al. (1961), HrbAEek (1962), Brooks & Dodson (1965), et StraSkraba (1965). Ces auteurs montrèrent (1) que dans les étangs et lacs en présence de poissons planctophages prédateurs visuels. les conimuiiautés‘zooplanctoniques étaient com- posées d’espèces de plus petites tailles que celles présentes dans les milieux dépourvus de planctophages et, (2) que les communautés zooplanctoniques résultantes, composées d’espèces de petites tailles, influençaient les communautés phytoplanctoniques.
  • Predation of Juvenile Chinook Salmon by Predatory Fishes in Three Areas of the Lake Washington Basin

    Predation of Juvenile Chinook Salmon by Predatory Fishes in Three Areas of the Lake Washington Basin

    PREDATION OF JUVENILE CHINOOK SALMON BY PREDATORY FISHES IN THREE AREAS OF THE LAKE WASHINGTON BASIN Roger A. Tabor, Mark T. Celedonia, Francine Mejia1, Rich M. Piaskowski2, David L. Low3, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office Fisheries Division 510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 102 Lacey, Washington 98513 Brian Footen, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, Washington 98092 and Linda Park, NOAA Fisheries Northwest Fisheries Science Center Conservation Biology Molecular Genetics Laboratory 2725 Montlake Blvd. E. Seattle, Washington 98112 February 2004 1Present address: U.S. Geological Survey, 6924 Tremont Road, Dixon, California 95620 2Present address: Bureau of Reclamation, 6600 Washburn Way, Klamath Falls, Oregon 97603 3Present address: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington 98501 SUMMARY Previous predator sampling of the Lake Washington system focused on predation of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) and little effort was given to quantify predation of Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha). In 1999 and 2000, we sampled various fish species to better understand the effect that predation has on Chinook salmon populations. Additionally, we reviewed existing data to get a more complete picture of predation. We collected predators in three areas of the Lake Washington basin where juvenile Chinook salmon may be particularly vulnerable to predatory fishes. Two of these areas, the Cedar River and the south end of Lake Washington are important rearing areas. In these areas, Chinook salmon may be vulnerable because they are small and are present for a relatively long period of time. The other study area, Lake Washington Ship Canal (LWSC; includes Portage Bay, Lake Union, Fremont Cut, and Salmon Bay), is a narrow migratory corridor where Chinook salmon smolts are concentrated during their emigration to Puget Sound.
  • The Relative Impacts of Native and Introduced Predatory Fish on a Temporary Wetland Tadpole Assemblage

    The Relative Impacts of Native and Introduced Predatory Fish on a Temporary Wetland Tadpole Assemblage

    Oecologia (2003) 136:289–295 DOI 10.1007/s00442-003-1251-2 COMMUNITY ECOLOGY Matthew J. Baber · Kimberly J. Babbitt The relative impacts of native and introduced predatory fish on a temporary wetland tadpole assemblage Received: 18 October 2002 / Accepted: 7 March 2003 / Published online: 24 April 2003 Springer-Verlag 2003 Abstract Understanding the relative impacts of predators tor-prey encounter rates, and thus predation rate. In on prey may improve the ability to predict the effects of combination with a related field study, our results suggest predator composition changes on prey assemblages. We that native predatory fish play a stronger role than C. experimentally examined the relative impact of native and batrachus in influencing the spatial distribution and introduced predatory fish on a temporary wetland am- abundance of temporary wetland amphibians in the phibian assemblage to determine whether these predators landscape. exert distinct (unique or non-substitutable) or equivalent (similar) impacts on prey. Predatory fish included the Keywords Fish assemblages · Functional relationships · eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki), golden top- Larval anurans · Predation · Temporary wetlands minnow (Fundulus chrysotus), flagfish (Jordanella flori- dae), and the introduced walking catfish (Clarias batrachus). The tadpole assemblage included four com- Introduction mon species known to co-occur in temporary wetlands in south-central Florida, USA: the oak toad (Bufo querci- Predators that occupy similar trophic positions may have cus), pinewoods treefrog (Hyla femoralis), squirrel distinct or equivalent effects on prey community dynam- treefrog (Hyla squirella), and eastern narrowmouth toad ics (Lawton and Brown 1993; Morin 1995; Kurzava and (Gastrophryne carolinensis). Tadpoles were exposed to Morin 1998).
  • 1 Stomach Content Analysis of the Invasive Mayan Cichlid

    1 Stomach Content Analysis of the Invasive Mayan Cichlid

    Stomach Content Analysis of the Invasive Mayan Cichlid (Cichlasoma urophthalmus) in the Tampa Bay Watershed Ryan M. Tharp1* 1Department of Biology, The University of Tampa, 401 W. Kennedy Blvd. Tampa, FL 33606. *Corresponding Author – [email protected] Abstract - Throughout their native range in Mexico, Mayan Cichlids (Cichlasoma urophthalmus) have been documented to have a generalist diet consisting of fishes, invertebrates, and mainly plant material. In the Everglades ecosystem, invasive populations of Mayan Cichlids displayed an omnivorous diet dominated by fish and snails. Little is known about the ecology of invasive Mayan Cichlids in the fresh and brackish water habitats in the Tampa Bay watershed. During the summer and fall of 2018 and summer of 2019, adult and juvenile Mayan Cichlids were collected via hook-and-line with artificial lures or with cast nets in seven sites across the Tampa Bay watershed. Fish were fixed in 10% formalin, dissected, and stomach contents were sorted and preserved in 70% ethanol. After sorting, stomach contents were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible and an Index of Relative Importance (IRI) was calculated for each taxon. The highest IRI values calculated for stomach contents of Mayan Cichlids collected in the Tampa Bay watershed were associated with gastropod mollusks in adults and ctenoid scales in juveniles. The data suggest that Mayan Cichlids in Tampa Bay were generalist carnivores. Introduction The Mayan Cichlid (Cichlasoma urophthalmus) was first described by Günther (1862) as a part of his Catalog of the Fishes in the British Museum. They are a tropical freshwater fish native to the Atlantic coast of Central America and can be found in habitats such as river drainages, lagoonal systems, and offshore cays (Paperno et al.
  • Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs

    Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs

    little fish BIG IMPACT Managing a crucial link in ocean food webs A report from the Lenfest Forage Fish Task Force The Lenfest Ocean Program invests in scientific research on the environmental, economic, and social impacts of fishing, fisheries management, and aquaculture. Supported research projects result in peer-reviewed publications in leading scientific journals. The Program works with the scientists to ensure that research results are delivered effectively to decision makers and the public, who can take action based on the findings. The program was established in 2004 by the Lenfest Foundation and is managed by the Pew Charitable Trusts (www.lenfestocean.org, Twitter handle: @LenfestOcean). The Institute for Ocean Conservation Science (IOCS) is part of the Stony Brook University School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences. It is dedicated to advancing ocean conservation through science. IOCS conducts world-class scientific research that increases knowledge about critical threats to oceans and their inhabitants, provides the foundation for smarter ocean policy, and establishes new frameworks for improved ocean conservation. Suggested citation: Pikitch, E., Boersma, P.D., Boyd, I.L., Conover, D.O., Cury, P., Essington, T., Heppell, S.S., Houde, E.D., Mangel, M., Pauly, D., Plagányi, É., Sainsbury, K., and Steneck, R.S. 2012. Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs. Lenfest Ocean Program. Washington, DC. 108 pp. Cover photo illustration: shoal of forage fish (center), surrounded by (clockwise from top), humpback whale, Cape gannet, Steller sea lions, Atlantic puffins, sardines and black-legged kittiwake. Credits Cover (center) and title page: © Jason Pickering/SeaPics.com Banner, pages ii–1: © Brandon Cole Design: Janin/Cliff Design Inc.
  • Fish Assemblages of Caribbean Coral Reefs: Effects of Overfishing on Coral Communities Under Climate Change

    Fish Assemblages of Caribbean Coral Reefs: Effects of Overfishing on Coral Communities Under Climate Change

    FISH ASSEMBLAGES OF CARIBBEAN CORAL REEFS: EFFECTS OF OVERFISHING ON CORAL COMMUNITIES UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE Abel Valdivia-Acosta A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Sciences in the Department of Biology, College of Art and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2014 Approved by: John Bruno Charles Peterson Allen Hurlbert Julia Baum Craig Layman © 2014 Abel Valdivia-Acosta ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Abel Valdivia-Acosta: Fish assemblages of Caribbean coral reefs: Effects of overfishing on coral communities under climate change (Under the direction of John Bruno) Coral reefs are threatened worldwide due to local stressors such as overfishing, pollution, and diseases outbreaks, as well as global impacts such as ocean warming. The persistence of this ecosystem will depend, in part, on addressing local impacts since humanity is failing to control climate change. However, we need a better understanding of how protection from local stressors decreases the susceptibility of reef corals to the effects of climate change across large-spatial scales. My dissertation research evaluates the effects of overfishing on coral reefs under local and global impacts to determine changes in ecological processes across geographical scales. First, as large predatory reef fishes have drastically declined due to fishing, I reconstructed natural baselines of predatory reef fish biomass in the absence of human activities accounting for environmental variability across Caribbean reefs. I found that baselines were variable and site specific; but that contemporary predatory fish biomass was 80-95% lower than the potential carrying capacity of most reef areas, even within marine reserves.
  • DNA‐Based Assessment of Their Role in Food Webs

    DNA‐Based Assessment of Their Role in Food Webs

    Received: 27 November 2019 Accepted: 20 May 2020 DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14400 SYMPOSIUM SPECIAL ISSUE REVIEW PAPER FISH Fish as predators and prey: DNA-based assessment of their role in food webs Michael Traugott1 | Bettina Thalinger1,2 | Corinna Wallinger3 | Daniela Sint1 1Applied Animal Ecology, Department of Zoology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Abstract Austria Fish are both consumers and prey, and as such part of a dynamic trophic network. 2 Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University Measuring how they are trophically linked, both directly and indirectly, to other spe- of Guelph, Guelph, Canada 3Institute of Interdisciplinary Mountain cies is vital to comprehend the mechanisms driving alterations in fish communities in Research, Austrian Academy of Science, space and time. Moreover, this knowledge also helps to understand how fish commu- Innsbruck, Austria nities respond to environmental change and delivers important information for Correspondence implementing management of fish stocks. DNA-based methods have significantly Michael Traugott, Department of Zoology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25, widened our ability to assess trophic interactions in both marine and freshwater sys- 6020 Innsbruck, Austria, tems and they possess a range of advantages over other approaches in diet analysis. Email: [email protected] In this review we provide an overview of different DNA-based methods that have Funding information been used to assess trophic interactions of fish as consumers and prey. We consider C.W., B.T. and D.S. were supported by Austrian Science Fund grants P 28578, P 24059, and P the practicalities and limitations, and emphasize critical aspects when analysing 26144, respectively. molecular derived trophic data.
  • The Role of Piscivores in a Species-Rich Tropical Food

    The Role of Piscivores in a Species-Rich Tropical Food

    THE ROLE OF PISCIVORES IN A SPECIES-RICH TROPICAL RIVER A Dissertation by CRAIG ANTHONY LAYMAN Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2004 Major Subject: Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences THE ROLE OF PISCIVORES IN A SPECIES-RICH TROPICAL RIVER A Dissertation by CRAIG ANTHONY LAYMAN Submitted to Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved as to style and content by: _________________________ _________________________ Kirk O. Winemiller Lee Fitzgerald (Chair of Committee) (Member) _________________________ _________________________ Kevin Heinz Daniel L. Roelke (Member) (Member) _________________________ Robert D. Brown (Head of Department) August 2004 Major Subject: Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences iii ABSTRACT The Role of Piscivores in a Species-Rich Tropical River. (August 2004) Craig Anthony Layman, B.S., University of Virginia; M.S., University of Virginia Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Kirk O. Winemiller Much of the world’s species diversity is located in tropical and sub-tropical ecosystems, and a better understanding of the ecology of these systems is necessary to stem biodiversity loss and assess community- and ecosystem-level responses to anthropogenic impacts. In this dissertation, I endeavored to broaden our understanding of complex ecosystems through research conducted on the Cinaruco River, a floodplain river in Venezuela, with specific emphasis on how a human-induced perturbation, commercial netting activity, may affect food web structure and function. I employed two approaches in this work: (1) comparative analyses based on descriptive food web characteristics, and (2) experimental manipulations within important food web modules.
  • Emeraid Feeding Guidelines

    Emeraid Feeding Guidelines

    Mixing Instructions for Various North American *Scoops of Emeraid Mixed Wild Animals *Use either the large end of the scoop with 60 cc of warm water (103-110°F) or the small end of the Adults Juveniles e e e † e e e r r r e r r r o o o r o o o v v v o v v v i i i v i i i n n b i n n b Taxa Natural foods of adults r r c r r m a e is m a e Aves O C H P O C H Blackbirds, Grackles, Cowbirds Seeds, insects 6 0 0 3 1 0 Bluebirds Insects, fruits 0 2 0 0 2 0 Chickadees, Titmouse Insects, seeds 1.5 1.5 0 0 2 0 Doves, Pigeons Seeds 6 0 0 4.5 0.5 0 Ducks–Mallard, Canvasback, Coots, Gadwall Vegetation, seeds, insects, molluscs 6 0 0 6 0 0 Ducks–Goldeneye, Bufflehead, Scoter Insects, crustacea, molluscs 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 Ducks–Scaup, Ruddy Aquatic vegetation, insects, crustacea 4.5 0.5 0 3 3 1 0 Finches, Siskins, Crossbills Seeds 6 0 0 6 0 0 Gamebirds–Grouse, Quail, Pheasant, Turkey Seeds, some insects 6 0 0 4.5 0.5 0 Grebes, Loons Fish, crustacea, molluscs 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 Geese Vegetation 3 0 2 4.5 0 1 TThehe FFirstirst S Elementalemi-Eleme nDiettal DSystemiet Syst eDesignedm Design fored Criticallyfor a Wid eIll VExoticsariety Gulls Fish, crustacea, molluscs 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 Jays, Magpies Seeds, insects 6 0 0 3 1 0 oWillf Cther nextitic severelyally debilitated Ill Exo animaltic beC ana amazon,rnivo a ferretres or, Han eiguana?rbi vExoticor eanimals a nd OmEmeraidnivo Omnivoreres Insects, fruits, seeds 1.5 1.5 0 0 2 0 Will the next severely debilitated animal be an Amazon, a ferret or an iguana? Exotic animal veterinarians are EProteinmera id Omnivore 20% ® Fat 9.5% Nuthatches Insects, seeds 1.5 1.5 0 0 2 0 pisre sdesignedented wit hto d quicklyifficult e mprovideergenci elife-savings every day elemental.