<<

Ocean and Coastal Management xxx (xxxx) xxx

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Ocean and Coastal Management

journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ocecoaman

Pulse sediment event does not impact the of a mixed coral community

K.D. Bahr a,*, K.S. Rodgers b, P.L. Jokiel b, N.G. Prouty c, C.D. Storlazzi c a Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, 78414, USA b University of Hawai’i, Hawaiʻi Institute of , Kane� ʻohe, HI, 96744, USA c US Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060, USA

ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT

Keywords: Sedimentation can bury corals, cause physical abrasion, and alter both spectral intensity and quality; however, Sedimentation few studies have quantified the effects of sedimentation on metabolism in the context of episodic Coral reefs sedimentation events. Here, we present the first study to measure coral community metabolism - calcification Community metabolism and photosynthesis - in a manipulative mesocosm experiment simulating a pulse sediment event. We exposed a mixed benthic community composed of 75% live carbonate rubble cover and 25% Montipora capitata coral cover À to an approximately 275 mg cm 1 (sediment accumulation) acute pulse sediment loading event. No differences were found in net calcification or net photosynthesis between the control and treated mesocosms 48 h and 25 d following exposure to pulse sediment input. Results from this community experiment indicate the ability of Montipora capitata, a common reef coral, to persist under these acute sediment levels, demonstrating resistance to episodic sediment events.

À 1. Introduction volume (mg l 1) or as sediment accumulation rates per unit surface area À À (mg cm 2 d 1) in sediment traps. Corals are estimated to be impacted by À À Coral reefs have high biological diversity and high rates of produc­ chronic sediment accumulation rates greater than 10 mg cm 1 day 1 À tivity; however, reefs are undergoing significant ecological change due and TSS above 10 mg l 1 (Rogers, 1990). These estimations may vary to local and global stressors. Sedimentation has been widely identifiedas dependent on the sediment properties (Flores et al., 2012). For example, a major detrimental factor on coral reefs (Cort�es and Risk, 1985; Fab­ corals have the greatest difficulty in removing the finest sediment ricius, 2005; Grigg and Birkeland, 1997; Johannes, 1975; Marshall and fractions (i.e., silt <63 μm) (Weber et al., 2006). Orr, 1931; Risk, 2014; Rogers, 1990). Direct and indirect impacts from Coral physiological stress occurs within hours of exposure to sedi­ sedimentation include burial, abrasion of coral surfaces, and a reduction mentation (Philipp and Fabricius, 2003; Weber et al., 2006). Sediment in the amount of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). deposition on the coral colony leads to down-regulation of photosyn­ Extensive reviews (e.g., Fabricius, 2005; Rogers, 1990) have deter­ thesis and increased rates of and mucous production for mined response of corals and coral reefs to sedimentation depends on: 1) sediment and particle removal (Riegl, 1995; Yentsch et al., 2002; Philipp stress response mechanisms from light reduction or sediment accumu­ and Fabricius, 2003; Telesnicki and Goldberg, 1995). Although corals lation; 2) amount and type of sediment, and the ability of the coral to have a variety of mechanisms to actively remove sediment particles (e. remove sediment; and 3) species-specific capabilities such as coral g., mucous production, tentacle movement, etc.), mortality can occur by morphology (calices, colony surface), orientation (vertical, horizontal) suffocation under anoxic conditions and startvation through depression and behavior (Fabricius, 2005; Rogers, 1990). Additionally, coral of photoynthesis or heterotrophic feeding (Hubbard and Pocock, 1972; response varies with episodic (infrequent) versus chronic sediment input Rogers, 1990; Philipp and Fabricius, 2003). (e.g., mudslide from 50-yr storm, versus chronic runoff due to poor land Organismal-level effects of sedimentation are well documented in use, etc.) and their drivers (Field et al., 2008). Quantitative studies have corals, but less is known about the impacts of sediment accumulation on generally described sediment impacts on corals in terms of suspended the coral community metabolism such as primary production, respira­ sediment as a mass of total suspended solids (TSS) per tion, calcification, and dissolution. The contribution of a coral reef

* Corresponding author. 6300 Ocean Drive, Unit 5800, Corpus Christi, TX, 78412-5800, USA. E-mail address: [email protected] (K.D. Bahr). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105007 Received 4 April 2019; Received in revised form 24 September 2019; Accepted 25 September 2019 0964-5691/Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Please cite this article as: K.D. Bahr, Ocean and Coastal Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105007 K.D. Bahr et al. Ocean and Coastal Management xxx (xxxx) xxx ecosystem to the global carbon cycle is a balance between organic car­ Inflowand outflowin all mesocosms was suspended for a 4 h period to bon production (photosynthesis) and consumption (respiration), and allow the sediment to settle. The duration of the pulse sediment event between calcium carbonate and dissolution. Sedimenta­ was set to be on the order naturally observed off high islands in the tion may disrupt this balance at the local scale and shift the role coral Pacifc Ocean (Field et al., 2008; Presto et al., 2010; Storlazzi et al., 2008, reefs play in the carbon cycle, from either serving as a carbon source or 2009, 2010, 2012). The other three mesocosms were left untreated to sink to the atmosphere. Therefore, the goal of this study was to deter­ serve as controls (Fig. 2). Diurnal coral community metabolism was mine the effect of an acute pulse sedimentation event on the metabolism characterized for 48 h following the sediment exposure (30 March of a mixed benthic coral reef community. 2016), and again 25 d (22 April 2016) later to assess recovery.

2. Methods 2.2. Analytical procedures

2.1. Experimental setup Environmental parameters were recorded hourly in the inflow and outflow of each mesocosm during diurnal sampling on 28 March 2016, This research was conducted in the flow-through mesocosm system 30 March 2016, and 22 April 2016. The HIMB meteorological station ʻ ʻ at the Hawai i Institute of Marine Biology (HIMB) at Moku o Lo e, located on site provided subaerial irradiance measurements (total irra­ � ʻ ʻ � � Kane ohe Bay, Hawai i (21.4 N, 157.8 W). This mesocosm system is diance, ultra violet, photosynthetically active radiation) as well as wind located in full sunlight and replicates the physical, chemical, and bio­ direction and speed, air , and precipitation data; these data logical conditions on a shallow reef flat (Jokiel et al., 2008; Kuffner are available at http://www.pacioos.hawaii.edu/weather/obs- et al., 2008). Flow rates for the open-system mesocosms averaged 10 l À mokuoloe/. 1 � À min for an approximately 1-hr turnover rate. ( C), polarographic dissolved (mg l 1), and Six continuous flowmesocosms were used for this experiment (660 l o salinity ( /oo) were measured in the inflow and outflow of each meso­ each). Each mesocosm contained a mixed benthic community composed cosm using a YSI multiparameter meter (YSI 556MPS) that has an ac­ of 75% live carbonate rubble (~8 cm) cover and 25% Montipora capitata � À 1 � curacy of �0.15 C, �0.2 mg l , and �2 /oo (Table 1), respectively. An (~20 cm colonies) coral cover (Fig. 1). Monitpora capitata is a major Accumet AP72 pH/mV/temperature meter with an accuracy of �0.01 reef-forming coral in Kane� ʻohe Bay and the third most dominant coral pH and �0.02 mV was used to measure pHNBS. Unfiltered seawater ’ species throughout Hawai i (Forsman et al., 2010; Maragos, 1972). samples for total alkalinity (TA) measurements were collected hourly Although it possesses encrusting, plating, and branching growth forms, and stored in 250-ml clear borosilicate glass bottles and analyzed within the most common branching morphology was used in this study. Coral 2 h of collection. TA was measured independently using an automatic and calcareous rubble were collected from the adjacent reef flat(~0.5 m titrator (Titrino Plus 877, Metrohm) with pH glass electrode (LL Aqua­ ’ depth) around Moku o Lo e. The coral and calcareous rubble were trode plus Pt1000, Metrohm) and normalized to salinity. Accuracy of the acclimated to ambient mesocosm conditions for 5 days before beginning automatic titrator was confirmed with certified reference materials the experiment. (Batch 127 from A. Dickson Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Ocean­ Diurnal community metabolism was measured prior to sediment ography). Two-point NBS (YSI 3822) standards (at pH 4 and pH 7) were loading on 24 March 2016 to generate a baseline and range of com­ use to calibrate the pH glass electrodes (i.e., Accumet AP72, Metrohm LL munity metabolism (i.e., calcificationand photosynthesis) in all 6 tanks. Aquatrode plus Pt1000). Temperature, TA, pHNBS, and salinity were Sediment loading commenced on 28 March 2016. Standard brass sieves used to calculate pCO2 and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) using the (USA Standard Testing Sieve: A.S.T.M.E.-11 specifications)were used to program CO2SYS (Pierrot et al., 2006) with the stoichiometric dissoci­ < evaluate the sediment size fraction. The silt/clay fraction ( 63 μm) was ation constants (K1, K2) defined by Mehrbach (1973) and refit by determined according to the Wentworth scale (Folk, 1974). A terrige­ Dickson and Millero (1987) using pHNBS parameters. Nutrient samples nous clay collected from an undisturbed eroding area in an isolated were not collected during the experiment. section near the highest point of Moku o Lo’e was used to avoid con­ taminants, therefore sediment was untreated. Sediment was combined 2.3. Sediment accumulation with 20 l of seawater to create a slurry and added to three randomly-selected mesocosms to simulate an acute sedimentation event. Three sediment traps, constructed from PVC, collected sediment in

Fig. 1. Experimental setup at the Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology at Moku o Loʻe, Kane� ʻohe Bay, Hawaiʻi during the simulated acute sediment loading event À (~275 mg cm 1 sediment accumulation) (A., B.). Each flow-throughmesocosm (660 l) contained mesocosm contained a mixed benthic community composed of live carbonate rubble (75%) cover and Montipora capitata (25%) coral cover was either exposed to sediment or held at ambient conditions.

2 K.D. Bahr et al. Ocean and Coastal Management xxx (xxxx) xxx

Fig. 2. Photographs of each mesocosm (Control and sediment) 6 h after sediment loading commenced on 28 March 2016.

Table 1 Environmental and chemical conditions for each treatment.

À 1 � À 1 À 2 À 1 Sampling Date Treatment pHNBS TA (μmol kg ) Temperature ( C) DO (mg L ) pCO2 (ppm) Irradiance (μmol photons m s )

Mean � SE Mean � SE Mean � SE Mean � SE Mean � SE Mean � SE Max

0 Control 8.06 � 0.01 2217.02 � 2.68 24.55 � 0.01 6.47 � 0.02 365.34 � 0.72 502 � 127 1624 Sediment 8.06 � 0.01 2215.21 � 3.42 24.53 � 0.01 6.46 � 0.01 366.74 � 2.06 2 Control 8.05 � 0.01 2177.08 � 0.61 25.37 � 0.02 7.00 � 0.01 376.52 � 0.68 633 � 128 1364 Sediment 8.04 � 0.01 2153.90 � 24.67 25.36 � 0.01 6.86 � 0.01 382.28 � 7.15 25 Control 8.07 � 0.01 2292.63 � 3.11 24.93 � 0.01 6.89 � 0.01 376.87 � 0.89 676 � 125 1354 Sediment 8.06 � 0.01 2290.30 � 1.30 24.94 � 0.02 6.85 � 0.01 377.32 � 0.71 each mesocosm (n ¼ 18). Traps were removed once all sediment had dO2 settled after 4 h under no-flowconditions, and thus accurately measured Pnet ¼ FinO2 À FoutO2 À dt (2) net sediment accumulation and not sediment dynamics (Storlazzi et al., 2010). Sediment within the traps was collected in pre-weighed What­ man 114 wet-strength filters, air dried, and weighed. Trap diameter 2.5. Statistical analysis (5 cm) and sediment were used to calculate sediment accumu­ À 1 lation in mg cm (Butman, 1986; Butman et al., 1986; Gardner, 1980, Environmental parameters (i.e., irradiance and pCO2) were 1980b). compared across sampling dates using a One-way ANOVA. Total daily GNet and PNet were calculated during daylight hours (07:00–19:00 HST) 2.4. Community metabolism and dark hours (20:00–06:00 HST). Total daily GNet and PNet were averaged among treatments and analyzed using a One-way ANOVA by Net calcification (Gnet) was calculated from the changes in TA be­ sampling date with fixed factors of treatment (i.e., sediment and tween the hourly inflow and outflow of each mesocosm using the TA control). anomaly method (Smith and Kinsey, 1978). Gnet represents the sum of all the calcificationprocesses minus the sum of all the dissolution processes 3. Results (Eq. (1)). Thus, all positive numbers represent net calcification and all negative numbers characterize net dissolution. Net calcification is Prior to the acute sedimentation event, environmental conditions À 2 À 1 expressed as mmol CaCO3 m h (Jokiel et al., 2014; Murillo et al., such as irradiance (one-way ANOVA; F(2,41) ¼ 0.5135; p ¼ 0.6024) and 2014). pCO2 (one-way ANOVA; F(2,29) ¼ 1.38; p ¼ 0.2694), parameters that

dAT could influencemetabolic response, did not differ across sampling dates FinAT À FoutAT À dt Gnet ¼ (1) (Table 1). Additionally, total daily GNet (p ¼ 0.6156 in light; p ¼ 0.7044 2 in dark), PNet (p ¼ 0.4300), and respiration (p ¼ 0.7438) did not differ Photosynthesis (Pnet) and respiration (R) were calculated from among mesocosms, indicating similar levels of metabolism among the À changes in dissolved oxygen (mg l 1) between the hourly six coral communities in the treatment and control mesocosms prior to inflowand outflowof each mesocosm. Pnet represents the sum of oxygen the simulated sedimentation event. production during daylight hours and R refers to the sum of oxygen Two days (48 h) after exposing the coral communities to the acute consumption during dark hours (Eq. (2)). Surface to volume ratio of each pulse sediment loading, there was no significant difference in total net mesocosm is included in the calculation for community metabolic rates calcification( p ¼ 0.2814; Fig. 3) or total net photosynthesis (p ¼ 0.7831; per m2. Fig. 4) between the control and treatment mesocosms. However, diurnal fluctuations of GNet were variable between the control (min ¼ À 4.52, À 2 À 1 max ¼ 89.87 mmol CaCO3 m d ) and treatment (min ¼ À 66.78

3 K.D. Bahr et al. Ocean and Coastal Management xxx (xxxx) xxx

Fig. 3. Net calcificationof control communities (blue) and sediment-loaded communities (red) before sediment loading (initial), 48 h following the sediment loading event (30 March 2016) and 25 d after (22 April 2016). Shading indicates night-time measurements (20:00–06:00 HST). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 4. Net photosynthesis of control communities (blue) and sediment-loaded communities (red) before sediment loading (initial), 48 h following the sediment loading event (30 March 2016) and 25 d after (22 April 2016). Shading indicates night-time measurements (20:00–06:00). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

À 2 À 1 max ¼ 30.70 mmol CaCO3 m d ) mesocosms, although the ranges and pH) remained similar between control and treatment communities À 2 À 1 were similar (control ¼ 94.39; sediment ¼ 97.48 mmol CaCO3 m d ) (Fig. 6). (Fig. 5). Diurnal curves of PNet and GNet were also similar among the control 4. Discussion and treatment mesocosms, therefore unimpacted by sediment loading (Fig. 5). Delayed impacts of sedimentation were not observed. Specif­ Results of this study reveal that coral community metabolism (i.e., ically, similar levels of GNet and PNet were observed in the control and GNet and PNet) did not differ among the control and treatment mesocosms treatment mesocosms 25 d following exposure (GNet p ¼ 0.7801; PNet 48 h and 25 d following a simulated episodic sedimentation event. This p ¼ 0.5605). Additionally, diurnal changes in concentration of carbon­ may indicate that a coral community dominated by Montipora capitata ate parameters (i.e., dissolved inorganic carbon, aragonite saturation, may be able to persist under these acute sedimentation accumulation

4 K.D. Bahr et al. Ocean and Coastal Management xxx (xxxx) xxx

Fig. 5. Time series of coral community response 48 h after exposure to sediment treatment. A. Average net photosynthesis. B. Average net calcification.Response of control (no sediment) communities indicated in blue and sediment loaded communities indicated in red. Irradiance is indicated by black dashed line. (For inter­ pretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.) levels (~275 mg cm1) over the short exposure period (4 h) typically adaptive strategy to optimize diverse ecological factors such as light and observed in nature (Field et al., 2008; Presto et al., 2010; Storlazzi et al., water motion and to reduce the effects of sedimentation (Rogers, 1990). 2008, 2009, 2010, 2012). The removal mechanism, metabolic cost, size, and location, may explain The observed community response of M. capitata may depend on species-specific responses (Fabricius, 2005; Telesnicki and Goldberg, sediment type and duration of exposure (Piniak, 2007). Exposure time in 1995). Some coral morphologies (e.g., those with tall polyps and convex this study was short (4 h); however, physiological stress occurs within colonies) substantially reduce the need for active removal thereby hours of exposure to sediment (Philipp and Fabricius, 2003; Weber et al., reducing energy expenditure (Lasker, 1980), while mucus production by 2006) and is strongly related to grain size, organic content, and nutrient M. peltiformis traps silt-sized sediments therefore increasing energy composition of the sediment (Weber et al., 2006). For example, Philipp expenditure (Weber et al., 2006). Previous studies (Brown et al., 1986; and Fabricius (2003) found that short-term sediment loading stress on Maragos, 1972; Rogers, 1990) have shown larger colonies to be more M. peltiformis increased linearly with increasing amounts and duration of resistant to sediment loading than smaller ones. Lastly, many coral sediment exposure. Conversely, Piniak et al. (2004) found only slight species located close to shore are also known to have higher tolerances damage and rapid recovery to the symbiotic zooxanthellae and its to sedimentation and a greater ability to remove sediment than corals in photosynthetic capacity. They report little immediate effect with rapid deeper waters (Salvat, 1987). recovery following 6 h of sediment exposure but no severe damage after Adult corals can survive and continue to grow in high sedimentation 30 h with recovery after 24 h. With longer exposure periods (12–68 h), environments (Jokiel et al., 2014a, 2014b); however, there recruitment recovery was incomplete after 96 h and required up to 4 weeks of new corals is significantly impaired in the presence of sediment following exposure in previous studies (Wessling et al., 1999; Weber (Gilmour, 1999; Babcock and Davis, 1991; Jokiel et al., 2014a, 2014b; et al., 2006). In comparison with this study, by the 48 h and 25 Perez et al., 2014).Previous work has shown coral larvae settlement to À d sampling period, corals showed no changes in metabolism. Clearly be inhibited with a fine sediment layer (>0.9 mg cm 2) (Perez et al., duration of sediment loading is a contributing factor to speed and po­ 2014). Without successful settlement and recruitment of young corals tential of recovery. the sustainability and resilience of the coral reef is lessened. The resil­ The resistance of M. capitata to acute sediment loading may also be ience and recovery of coral reefs will be greatly reduced by land-derived attributed to a number of adaptations including morphology, polyp size, sediment. and rapid growth. An extensive review on coral response to sedimen­ High volcanic islands such as those in Hawaiʻi generally erode during tation ( and/or loading) found that tolerance was significantly episodic, high-intensity rainfall events (Ferrier et al., 2013; Fontaine and related to coral growth morphology but not calyx size (Erftemeijer et al., Hill, 2002; Gayer et al., 2008), and generally during the winter when 2012). Branching morphologies, such as those used in this study, are an wave energy is high (Draut et al., 2009). This, together with the

5 K.D. Bahr et al. Ocean and Coastal Management xxx (xxxx) xxx

Fig. 6. Diurnal changes in concentration of carbonate parameters for control (blue) and sediment (red) treated coral communities before (initial; 28 March 2016), 48 h (30 March 2016) and 25 d (22 April 2016) after sediment loading. A. Total alkalinity (TA). B. Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC). C. Aragonite saturation (ΩArag). D. Dissolved oxygen (O2). E. pHNBS. Grey shading indicates night time hours. Error bars are SE of the mean of mesocosms (n ¼ 3). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.) relatively short stream drainages, results in episodic run-off events that characterized by persistent high turbidity and chronic sediment loading, deliver a pulse of terrestrial sediment to the nearshore during a rela­ M. capitata showed increased mortality with increased turbidity (Jokiel tively short time interval (Field et al., 2008; Presto et al., 2010; Storlazzi et al., 2014b; Perez et al., 2014). This suggests that although able to et al., 2008, 2009, 2010, 2012). Such reefs are therefore naturally survive episodic pulse sedimentation events, M. capitata may not be exposed to such pulse terrestrial sedimentation events for a relatively suited to chronic turbidity and/or sediment deposition (Ogston et al., short duration, as subsequent winter large wave events would resuspend 2004; Presto et al., 2006; Storlazzi and Jaffe, 2008; Storlazzi et al., and advect the sediment away from the nearshore reefs (Presto et al., 2004). Anthropogenic activities (e.g., land-use change) are more readily 2006; Storlazzi and Jaffe, 2008). Thus, over the time scales of the islands linked to chronic sediment loading and increase terrestrial sediment and their associated coral reef development, nearshore corals were delivery to the nearshore (Field et al., 2008), especially in coral reef subjected to natural, episodic pulse sedimentation events and thus they locations that are generally exposed most of the year to Trade-wind must have evolved to occupy such environmental niches. forcing. Temporal results of episodic events from field studies vary More importantly, these results suggest that in contrast to chronic (Field et al., 2008; Pineda and Reyns, 2017; Storlazzi et al., 2009a,b). It exposure, episodic sediment input may be less detrimental, consistent is difficultto compare sediment suspension times and exposure of corals with fieldobservations. For example, corals off south Molokai, Hawai’i, to sediment loading at different sites due to a number of factors such as exposed to chronic terrestrial sediment exposure due to runoff from poor hydrodynamics, sediment properties, and physical barriers (Field et al., land-use practices and almost daily resuspension by Trade winds 2008; McCluney, 1975; Ogston et al., 2004; Presto et al., 2006; Storlazzi (Ogston et al., 2004; Presto et al., 2006; Field et al., 2008) exhibited et al., 2004, 2009; Storlazzi and Jaffe, 2008). lower growth rates compared to sites exposed to episodic sedimentation Although chronic sediment loading can be detrimental to corals, the events (Prouty et al., 2010). Episodic events such as measured here indirect impacts of episodic sediment events may contribute to an allow for periods of recovery when sediment levels return to baseline amelioration of bleaching impacts as climate change accelerates. Clays and corals are able to maintain a higher growth rate. At locations and fine organic particles are easily resuspended, reducing irradiance

6 K.D. Bahr et al. Ocean and Coastal Management xxx (xxxx) xxx

levels (Piniak and Storlazzi, 2008; Storlazzi et al., 2015) and thus dedicated to Dr. Paul Jokiel, a pioneer and visionary in the fieldof coral available light that affects energy acquisition for the algal symbionts (i. reef research and founder of the Coral Reef Ecology Laboratory where e., Symbiodinium spp), which, in turn, leads to lower carbon gain, slower this research was conducted. We would also like to thank Kim Yates calcification and thinner tissues (Anthony and Hoegh-Guldberg, 2003; (USGS) and three anonymous reviewers who contributed excellent Rogers, 1979; Telesnicki and Goldberg, 1995). However, during massive suggestions and timely reviews of our work. Use of trademark names coral bleaching events, sunlight and water visibility have been shown to does not imply USGS endorsement of products. be significantfactors in coral response to temperature stress (Jokiel and This publication is referenced as the University of Hawai’i’s School Coles, 1990). Following severe bleaching and mortality in 2014 and of Ocean and Earth Sciences (SOEST) contribution number 10797 and 2015, no widespread bleaching occurred in 2016 due to increased cloud Hawai’i Institute of Marine Biology (HIMB) contribution number 1770. cover and heavy rains associated with numerous summer storms (Bahr et al., 2017). Episodic sedimentation accompanying the storm effluent References reduced water clarity and light penetration, which has been shown to diminish temperature impacts to corals (Jokiel, 2004; Jokiel and Coles, Anthony, K., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., 2003. Variation in coral photosynthesis, respiration and growth characteristics in contrasting light microhabitats: an analogue to plants 1990). In contrast, chronic sedimentation is continuous and there are no in forest gaps and understoreys? Funct. Ecol. 17, 246–259. � periods of recovery, and thus more threatening to coral reef health. Alvarez-Filip, L., Millet-Encalada, M., Reyes-Bonilla, H., 2009. Impact of hurricanes During this study, we ultilized the alkalinity anomaly technique to emily and wilma on the coral community of cozumel island. 84 (3), 295–306. Babcock, R., Davies, P., 1991. Effects of sedimentation on settlement of Acropora measure net community calcification rates (Smith and Key, 1975). millepora. Coral Reefs 9, 205–208. However, this study did not investigate the magnitude of alkalinity Bahr, K.D., Rodgers, K.S., Jokiel, P.L., 2017. Impact of three bleaching events on the reef contribution from other processes such as organic matter production resiliency of Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 398. from photosynthesis (Kim and Lee, 2009), anaerobic diagenesis in sed­ Brewer, P.G., Goldman, J.C., 1976. Alkalinity changes generated by phytoplankton growth. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21, 108–117. iments (Emerson and Hedges, 2003), and nutrient transformation Brown, B., Le Tissier, M., Howard, L., Charuchinda, M., Jackson, J., 1986. Asynchronous (Brewer and Goldman, 1976; Wolf-Gladrow et al., 2007). During deposition of dense skeletal bands in Porites lutea. Mar. Biol. 93, 83–89. experimentation, the addition of the terrigenous sediment may have Butman, C.A., 1986. Sediment trap biases in turbulent flows: results from a laboratory flume study. J. Mar. Res. 44, 645–693. increased nutrients levels in treated mesocosms. For example, Murillo Butman, C.A., Grant, W.D., Stolzenbach, K.D., 1986. Predictions of sediment trap biases et al. (2014) demonstrated that carbonate sediments are a source of in turbulent flows: a theoretical analysis based on observations from the literature. – alkanlinity to the water column. J. Mar. Res. 44, 601 644. Cort�es, J.N., Risk, M.J., 1985. A reef under siltation stress: Cahuita, Costa Rica. Bull. Mar. Sci. 36, 339–356. 5. Conclusion Dickson, A.G., Millero, F.J., 1987. A comparison of the equilibrium constants for the dissociation of carbonic acid in seawater media. Deep-Sea Res. Part A Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 34, 1733–1743. To our knowledge, this is the first study to experimentally test the Draut, A., Bothner, M.H., Field, M., Reynolds, R., Cochran, S., Logan, J., Storlazzi, C., effect of an acute pulse sedimentation event on coral reef metabolism. Berg, C., 2009. Supply and dispersal of flood sediment from a steep, tropical Results of this study highlight the resistance of M. capitata to pulse, watershed: Hanalei Bay, Kaua’i, Hawai’i, USA. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 121, 574–585. Emerson, S., Hedges, J., 2003. Sediment diagenesis and benthic flux.Treatise. Geochem. sedimentation event. In other words, these results are important for 6, 625. reconsideration of conservation and restoration targets, as M. capitata is Fabricius, K.E., 2005. Effects of terrestrial runoff on the ecology of corals and coral reefs: the third most common nearshore species found in the main Hawaiian review and synthesis. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 50, 125–146. Fenner, D.P., 1991. Effects of on coral reefs, fishes and at Islands (Rodgers, 2005). Cozumel, Mexico. Bull. Mar. Sci. 48 (3), 719–730. During the occurrence of an extreme event (e.g., hurricanes), corals Ferrier, K.L., Huppert, K.L., Perron, J.T., 2013. Climatic control of bedrock river incision. are subjected to many types of stressors simultaneously. Episodic sedi­ Nature 496, 206. ’ ’ — ment loading that occurs during these events may interact with other The coral reef of south Moloka i, Hawai i portrait of a sediment-threatened fringing reef. In: Field, M.E., Cochran, S.A., Logan, J.B., Storlazzi, C.D. (Eds.), 2008. USGS stressors (e.g., freshwater input, storm surge, shifts in irradiance, Scientific Investigation Report 2007-5101, 180 pp. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2007/ pollution) to mitigate or exacerbate coral response to such environ­ 5101/. � mental change (Fenner, 1991; Manzello et al., 2007; Alvarez-Filip et al., Flores, F., Hoogenboom, M.O., Smith, L.D., Cooper, T.F., Abrego, D., Negri, A.P., 2012. Chronic exposure of corals to finesediments: lethal and sub-lethal impacts. PLoS One 2009). During such extreme events, it is difficultto separate the effects 7, e37795. from these impacts. Controlled experiments can examine a single impact Folk, R., 1974. Petrography of Sedimentary Rocks. Univ. Texas, Hemphill, Austin, Tex, while maintaining comparability of other conditions that field condi­ 182. Fontaine, R.A., Hill, B.R., 2002. Streamflow and Erosion Response to Prolonged Intense tions cannot provide. Complimentary studies examining the impact of Rainfall of November 1-2, 2000, Island of Hawaii. Geological Survey (US), Hawaii. chronic sediment input will further aid in our understanding of coral and Forsman, Z.H., Concepcion, G.T., Haverkort, R.D., Shaw, R.W., Maragos, J.E., Toonen, R. coral reef response to sedimentation, particularly in areas of chronic J., 2010. Ecomorph or endangered coral? DNA and microstructure reveal Hawaiian species complexes: Montipora dilatata/flabellata/turgescens & M. patula/verrilli. sediment input that may be more relevant in regions that experience PLoS One 5, e15021. accelerated land-use change. In areas vulnerable to high sedimentation, Gardner, W.D., 1980. Sediment trap dynamics and calibration: a laboratory evaluation. concentrating management efforts on the more susceptible species can J. Mar. Res. 38, 17–39. Gayer, E., Mukhopadhyay, S., Meade, B.J., 2008. Spatial variability of erosion rates assist in maintaining community diversity. Research in understanding inferred from the frequency distribution of cosmogenic 3 He in olivines from both chronic and acute pulse sediment tolerances of dominant coral Hawaiian river sediments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 266, 303–315. species are critical for establishing management thresholds and will Gilmour, J., 1999. Experimental investigation into the effects of suspended sediment on allow for more comprehensive and strategic management plans. fertilisation, larval survival and settlement in a scleractinian coral. Mar. Biol. 135, 451–462. Grigg, R.W., Birkeland, C., 1997. Status of Coral Reefs in the Pacific. University of Declaration of competing interest Hawaii, Sea Grant College Program. Hubbard, J.A.E.B., Pocock, Y.P., 1972. Sediment rejection by recent scleractinian corals: a key to palaeo-environmental reconstrustion. Int J Earth Stud 61, 598–626. None. Johannes, R., 1975. Pollution and Degradation of Coral Reef Communities. Elsevier Series. Elsevier, pp. 13–51. Acknowledgements Jokiel, P.L., 2004. Temperature Stress and Coral Bleaching, Coral Health and Disease. Springer, pp. 401–425. Jokiel, P.L., Bahr, K.D., Rodgers, K.S., 2014. Low cost ocean acidification system for This work was supported by the United States Geological Survey, high-flow mesocosm and field applications on coral reefs. Limnol. Oceanogr. Coastal and the Marine Geology Program’s cooperative agreement Methods 12, 313–322. Jokiel, P.L., Coles, S.L., 1990. Response of Hawaiian and other Indo-Pacificreef corals to G13AC00130. K.D.B. also acknowledges NSF#OA14-16889 for salary elevated temperature. Coral Reefs 8, 155–162. support during the writing and publication process. This work is

7 K.D. Bahr et al. Ocean and Coastal Management xxx (xxxx) xxx

Jokiel, P.L., Rodgers, K.S., Kuffner, I.B., Andersson, A.J., Cox, E.F., Mackenzie, F.T., Risk, M.J., 2014. Assessing the effects of sediments and nutrients on coral reefs. Cur. 2008. Ocean acidification and calcifying reef organisms: a mesocosm investigation. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 7, 108–117. Coral Reefs 27, 473–483. Rodgers, K.S., 2005. Evaluation of Nearshore Coral Reef Condition and Identification of Jokiel, P.L., Rodgers, K.S., Storlazzi, C.D., Field, M.E., Lager, C.V., Lager, D., 2014. Indicators in the Main Hawaiian Islands. Response of reef corals on a fringing reef flat to elevated suspended-sediment Rogers, C.S., 1979. The effect of shading on coral reef structure and function. J. Exp. Mar. concentrations: Molokaʻi, Hawaiʻi. PeerJ 2, e699. Biol. Ecol. 41, 269–288. Kim, H.C., Lee, K., 2009. Significantcontribution of dissolved organic matter to seawater Rogers, C.S., 1990. Responses of coral reefs and reef organisms to sedimentation. Mar. alkalinity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 62, 185–202. Kuffner, I.B., Andersson, A.J., Jokiel, P.L., Rodgers, K.S., Mackenzie, F.T., 2008. Salvat, B., 1987. Human Impacts on Coral Reefs: Facts and Recommendations. Decreased abundance of crustose coralline algae due to ocean acidification. Nat. Smith, S., Key, G., 1975. Carbon dioxide and metabolism in marine environments1. Geosci. 1, 114–117. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20, 493–495. Lasker, H.R., 1980. Sediment rejection by reef corals: the roles of behavior and Smith, S., Kinsey, D., 1978. Calcificationand organic carbon metabolism as indicated by morphology in Montastrea cavernosa (Linnaeus). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 47, 77–87. carbon dioxide. Coral Reefs: Res. methods 5, 469–484. Manzello, D.P., Brandt, M., Smith, T.B., Lirman, D., Hendee, J.C., Nemeth, R.S., 2007. Storlazzi, C.D., Jaffe, B.E., 2008. The relative contribution of processes driving Hurricanes benefit bleached corals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104 (29), 12035–12039. variability in flow,shear, and turbidity over a fringing coral reef: west Maui, Hawaii. Maragos, J.E., 1972. A Study of the Ecology of Hawaiian Reef Corals. University of Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 77, 549–564. Hawaii, University Microfilms, Oceanography. Storlazzi, C.D., Ogston, A.S., Bothner, M.H., Field, M.E., Presto, M., 2004. Wave-and Marshall, S.M., Orr, A.P., 1931. Sedimentation on Low Isles Reef and its Relation to Coral tidally-driven flowand sediment fluxacross a fringing coral reef: Southern Molokai, Growth. British Museum (Natural History). Hawaii. Cont. Shelf Res. 24, 1397–1419. McCluney, W., 1975. Radiometry of water turbidity measurements. J. Water Pollut. Storlazzi, C.D., Presto, M.K., Logan, J.B., Field, M.E., 2008. Coastal circulation and Control Fed. 252–266. sediment dynamics in Hanalei Bay, Kauai. PART IV: measurements of waves, Mehrbach, C., 1973. Measurement of the Apparent Dissociation Constants of Carbonic currents, temperature, salinity, and turbidity: June - August, 2006. USGS Open-File Acid in Seawater at Atmospheric . Report 2008-1295, 29 pp. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1295/. Murillo, L.J., Jokiel, P.L., Atkinson, M.J., 2014. Alkalinity to calcium fluxratios for corals Storlazzi, C.D., Field, M.E., Bothner, M.H., Presto, M., Draut, A.E., 2009. Sedimentation and coral reef communities: variances between isolated and community conditions. processes in a coral reef embayment: Hanalei Bay, Kauai. Mar. Geol. 264, 140–151. PeerJ 2, e249. Storlazzi, C.D., Presto, M.K., Logan, J.B., 2009. Coastal circulation and sediment Ogston, A., Storlazzi, C., Field, M., Presto, M., 2004. Sediment resuspension and dynamics in war-in-the-Pacific national Historical Park, Guam. Measurements of transport patterns on a fringing reef flat,Molokai, Hawaii. Coral Reefs 23, 559–569. waves, currents, temperature, salinity, and turbidity: June 2007 – January 2008. Perez III, K., Rodgers, K.S., Jokiel, P.L., Lager, C.V., Lager, D.J., 2014. Effects of USGS Open-File Report 2009-1195, 79 pp. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1195/. terrigenous sediment on settlement and survival of the reef coral Pocillopora Storlazzi, C.D., Presto, M.K., Logan, J.B., Field, M.E., 2010. Coastal circulation and damicornis. PeerJ 2, e387. sediment dynamics in Maunalua Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. Measurements of waves, Philipp, E., Fabricius, K., 2003. Photophysiological stress in scleractinian corals in currents, temperature, salinity, and turbidity: november 2008 – February 2009. response to short-term sedimentation. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 287, 57–78. USGS Open-File Report 2010-1217, 60 pp. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1217. Pierrot, D., Lewis, E., Wallace, D.W.R., 2006. MS Excel Program Developed for CO2 Storlazzi, C.D., Field, M.E., Presto, M.K., Swarzenski, P.W., Logan, J.B., Reiss, T.E., System Calculations. Elfers, T.C., Cochran, S.A., Torresan, M.E., Chezar, H., 2012. Coastal circulation and Pineda, J., Reyns, N., 2017. Larval transport in the coastal zone: biological and physical sediment dynamics in Pelekane and Kawaihae Bays, Hawaii–measurements of processes. Evol. Ecol. Mar. Invertebr. Larvae 145. waves, currents, temperature, salinity, turbidity, and geochronology: november Piniak, G., 2004. Sediment Impacts on Reef Corals in Maui, Hawai ‘i. 2010–March 2011. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012-1264, 102 pp. http: Piniak, G.A., 2007. Effects of two sediment types on the fluorescence yield of two //pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1264/. Hawaiian scleractinian corals. Mar. Environ. Res. 64, 456–468. Storlazzi, C.D., Norris, B.K., Rosenberger, K.J., 2015. The influence of grain size, grain Piniak, G.A., Storlazzi, C.D., 2008. Diurnal variability in turbidity and coral fluorescence color, and suspended-sediment concentration on light attenuation: why fine-grained on a fringing reef flat: Southern Molokai, Hawaii. Estuarine, Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. terrestrial sediment is bad for coral reef ecosystems. Coral Reefs 34, 967–975. 77, 56–64. Telesnicki, G.J., Goldberg, W.M., 1995. Effects of turbidiy on the photosynthesis and Presto, M., Ogston, A., Storlazzi, C., Field, M., 2006. Temporal and spatial variability in respiration of two south Florida reef coral species. Bull. Mar. Sci. 57, 527–539. the flow and dispersal of suspended-sediment on a fringing reef flat, Molokai, Weber, M., Lott, C., Fabricius, K.E., 2006. Sedimentation stress in a scleractinian coral Hawaii. Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 67, 67–81. exposed to terrestrial and marine sediments with contrasting physical, organic and Presto, M.K., Storlazzi, C.D., Field, M.E., 2010. Sediment Dynamics off two watersheds geochemical properties. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 336, 18–32. on the north coast of Kahoolawe. Measurements of turbidity, stream discharge, and Wolf-Gladrow, D.A., Zeebe, R.E., Klaas, C., Kortzinger,€ A., Dickson, A.G., 2007. Total rainfall: november 2005 to October 2008. USGS Open-File Report 2010-1037, 18 pp. alkalinity: the explicit conservative expression and its application to biogeochemical http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1037/. processes. Mar. Chem. 106, 287–300. Prouty, N.G., Field, M.E., Stock, J.D., Jupiter, S.D., McCulloch, M., 2010. Coral Ba/Ca Yentsch, C.S., Yentsch, C.M., Cullen, J.J., Lapointe, B., Phinney, D.A., et al., 2002. records of sediment input to the fringing reef of the southshore of Moloka’i, Hawai’i Sunlight and water transparency: cornerstones in coral research. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. over the last several decades. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 60, 1822–1835. Ecol. 268, 171–183. Riegl, B., 1995. Effects of sand deposition on scleractinian and alcyonacean corals. Mar. Biol. 121, 517–526.

8