DOCSLIB.ORG

MCI: Appendix C—Canadian Census Metropolitan Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MCI: Appendix C—Canadian Census Metropolitan Areas Appendix C | The Conference Board of Canada Appendix C Canadian Census Metropolitan Areas Name Type Name Type St. John’s Salisbury Village Conception Bay South Town Hillsborough Paroisse (Municipalité de) Portugal Cove-St. Philip’s Town Hillsborough Village Pouch Cove Town Dorchester Village Flatrock Town Elgin Paroisse (Municipalité de) Torbay Town Saint-Paul Paroisse (Municipalité de) Logy Bay-Middle Cover-Outer Cove Town Dorchester Paroisse (Municipalité de) Bauline Town Fort Folly 1 Indian Reserve Paradise Town Saint John St. John’s City Saint Martins Parish Mount Pearl City St. Martins Village Petty Harbour-Maddox Cove Town Simonds Parish Bay Bulls Town Saint John City Witless Bay Town Musquash Parish Halifax Lepreau Parish Cole Harbour 30 Indian Reserve Petersville Parish Shubenacadie 13 Indian Reserve Upham Parish Halifax Regional Municipality Hampton Parish Sheet Harbour Regional Municipality Hampton Town Moncton Rothesay Parish Moncton City Westfield Parish Dieppe City Kingston Parish Riverview Town Grand Bay–Westfield Town Moncton Paroisse (Municipalité de) Greenwich Parish Memramcook Village Rothesay Town Coverdale Paroisse (Municipalité de) Quispamsis Town Find Conference Board research at conferenceboard.ca. 1 Major City Insights Canadian Census Metropolitan Areas Name Type Name Type Saguenay Loretteville Ville Saint-Fulgence Municipalité Val-Bélair Ville La Baie Ville L’Ancienne-Lorette Ville Laterrière Ville Sainte-Foy Ville Chicoutimi Ville Cap-Rouge Ville Tremblay Canton (Municipalité de) Saint-Augustin-de-Desmaures Municipalité Saint-Honoré Municipalité Wendake Indian Reserve Shipshaw Municipalité Pintendre Municipalité Jonquière Ville Saint-Joseph-de-la-Pointe-de-Lévy Paroisse (Municipalité de) Lac-Kénogami Municipalité Lévis Ville Larouche Municipalité Saint-Lambert-de-Lauzon Paroisse (Municipalité de) Québec Saint-Étienne-de-Lauzon Municipalité Beaumont Municipalité Sainte-Hélène-de-Breakeyville Paroisse (Municipalité de) Saint-François Paroisse (Municipalité de) Saint-Jean-Chrysostome Ville Sainte-Famille Paroisse (Municipalité de) Saint-Romuald Ville Saint-Jean Paroisse (Municipalité de) Charny Ville Saint-Laurent-de-l’Île-d’Orléans Municipalité Saint-Rédempteur Ville Saint-Pierre-de-l’Île-d’Orléans Municipalité Saint-Nicolas Ville Sainte-Pétronille Village Sherbrooke Château-Richer Ville Ascot Corner Municipalité L’Ange-Gardien Paroisse (Municipalité de) Stoke Municipalité Boischatel Municipalité Saint-Denis-de-Brompton Paroisse (Municipalité de) Sainte-Catherine-de-la- Ville Waterville Ville Jacques-Cartier Lennoxville Ville Fossambault-sur-le-Lac Ville Ascot Municipalité Lac-Saint-Joseph Ville Fleurimont Ville Shannon Municipalité Bromptonville Ville Saint-Gabriel-de-Valcartier Municipalité Sherbrooke Ville Lac-Delage Ville Rock Forest Ville Stoneham-et-Tewkesbury Cantons unis Deauville Municipalité (Municipalité de) Saint-Élie-d’Orford Municipalité Lac-Beauport Municipalité Compton Municipalité Sainte-Brigitte-de-Laval Municipalité North Hatley Village Beauport Ville Hatley Canton (Municipalité de) Vanier Ville Trois-Rivières Notre-Dame-des-Anges Paroisse (Municipalité de) Champlain Municipalité Sillery Ville Saint-Maurice Paroisse (Municipalité de) Québec Ville Sainte-Marthe-du-Cap Ville Charlesbourg Ville Cap-de-la-Madeleine Ville Saint-Émile Ville Saint-Louis-de-France Ville Lac-Saint-Charles Ville Find Conference Board research at conferenceboard.ca. 2 Appendix C | The Conference Board of Canada Name Type Name Type Trois-Rivières Ville Anjou Ville Trois-Rivières-Ouest Ville Saint-Léonard Ville Pointe-du-Lac Municipalité Montréal-Nord Ville Bécancour Ville Montréal Ville Wôlinak 11 Indian Reserve Westmount Ville Montréal Verdun Ville Lavaltrie Village LaSalle Ville Saint-Antoine-de-Lavaltrie Paroisse (Municipalité de) Montréal-Ouest Ville Richelieu Ville Côte-Saint-Luc City Saint-Mathias-sur-Richelieu Municipalité Lachine Ville Chambly Ville Hampstead Ville Carignan Ville Outremont Ville Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville Ville Mont-Royal Ville Saint-Basile-le-Grand Ville Saint-Laurent Ville McMasterville Municipalité Dorval City Otterburn Park Ville L’Île-Dorval Ville Mont-Saint-Hilaire Ville Pointe-Claire Ville Beloeil Ville Kirkland Ville Saint-Mathieu-de-Beloeil Municipalité Beaconsfield Ville Brossard Ville Baie-d’Urfé Ville Saint-Lambert Ville Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue Ville Greenfield Park Ville Senneville Village Saint-Hubert Ville Pierrefonds Ville LeMoyne Ville Sainte-Geneviève Ville Longueuil Ville Dollard-des-Ormeaux Ville Boucherville Ville Roxboro Ville Sainte-Julie Ville L’ Î l e - B iz a rd Ville Saint-Amable Municipalité Saint-Mathieu Municipalité Varennes Ville Saint-Philippe Municipalité Charlemagne Ville La Prairie Ville Le Gardeur Ville Candiac Ville Repentigny Ville Delson Ville Saint-Sulpice Paroisse (Municipalité de) Sainte-Catherine Ville L’Assomption Ville Saint-Constant Ville Lachenaie Ville Saint-Isidore Paroisse (Municipalité de) Terrebonne Ville Mercier Ville Mascouche Ville Châteauguay Ville La Plaine Ville Léry Ville Laval Ville Kahnawake 14 Indian Reserve Montréal-Est Ville Maple Grove Ville Find Conference Board research at conferenceboard.ca. 3 Major City Insights Canadian Census Metropolitan Areas Name Type Name Type Beauharnois Ville Aylmer Ville Melocheville Village Val-des-Monts Municipalité Les Cèdres Municipalité Cantley Municipalité Pointe-des-Cascades Village Chelsea Municipalité L’ Î l e - P e r rot Ville Pontiac Municipalité Notre-Dame-de-l’Île-Perrot Municipalité La Pêche Municipalité Pincourt Ville Clarence-Rockland City Terrasse-Vaudreuil Municipalité Russell Township Vaudreuil-Dorion Ville Ottawa City Vaudreuil-sur-le-Lac Village Kingston L’Île-Cadieux Ville Frontenac Islands Township Hudson Ville Kingston City Saint-Lazare Paroisse (Municipalité de) South Frontenac Township Saint-Eustache Ville Loyalist Township Deux-Montagnes Ville Oshawa Sainte-Marthe-sur-le-Lac Ville Whitby Town Pointe-Calumet Municipalité Oshawa City Saint-Joseph-du-Lac Municipalité Clarington Town Oka Municipalité Toronto Saint-Placide Municipalité Pickering City Kanesatake Indian Reserve Ajax Town Boisbriand Ville Uxbridge Township Sainte-Thérèse Ville Vaughan City Blainville Ville Markham Town Rosemère Ville Richmond Hill Town Lorraine Ville Whitchurch-Stouffville Town Bois-des-Filion Ville Aurora Town Sainte-Anne-des-Plaines Ville Newmarket Town Mirabel Ville King Township Saint-Colomban Paroisse (Municipalité de) East Gwillimbury Town Bellefeuille Ville Georgina Town Saint-Jérôme Ville Chippewas of Georgina Island Indian Reserve First Nation Saint-Antoine Ville Toronto City Lafontaine Ville Mississauga City Gore Canton (Municipalité de) Brampton City Ottawa–Gatineau Caledon Town Buckingham Ville Mono Town Masson-Angers Ville Orangeville Town Gatineau Ville Oakville Town Hull Ville Find Conference Board research at conferenceboard.ca. 4 Appendix C | The Conference Board of Canada Name Type Name Type Milton Town Windsor City Halton Hills Town Tecumseh Town New Tecumseth Town Lakeshore Town Bradford West Gwillimbury Town Greater Sudbury Hamilton Whitefish Lake 6 Indian Reserve Burlington City Greater Sudbury City Hamilton City Wahnapitei 11 Indian Reserve Grimsby Town Thunder Bay St. Catharines–Niagara Neebing Township Fort Erie Town Fort William 52 Indian Reserve Port Colborne City Thunder Bay City Wainfleet Township Oliver Paipoonge Township Pelham Town Gillies Township Welland City O’Connor Township Thorold City Conmee Township Niagara Falls City Shuniah Township Niagara-on-the-Lake Town Winnipeg St. Catharines City Taché Rural Municipality Lincoln Town Ritchot Rural Municipality Kitchener–Cambridge–Waterloo St. François Xavier Rural Municipality North Dumfries Township Winnipeg City Cambridge City Headingley Rural Municipality Kitchener City Springfield Rural Municipality Waterloo City East St. Paul Rural Municipality Woolwich Township West St. Paul Rural Municipality Guelph St. Clements Rural Municipality Guelph City Brokenhead 4 Indian Reserve Guelph/Eramosa Township Rosser Rural Municipality Puslinch Township Regina London Pense No. 160 Rural Municipality Central Elgin Township Belle Plaine Village St. Thomas City Pense Village Southwold Township Sherwood No. 159 Rural Municipality Strathroy-Caradoc Township Regina City Thames Centre Township Grand Coulee Village Middlesex Centre Township Edenwold No. 158 Rural Municipality London City White City Town Windsor Pilot Butte Town Amherstburg Town Balgonie Town LaSalle Town Edenwold Village Find Conference Board research at conferenceboard.ca. 5 Major City Insights Canadian Census Metropolitan Areas Name Type Name Type Lumsden No. 189 Rural Municipality Crossfield Town Disley Village Tsuu T’ina Nation 145 Indian Reserve Buena Vista Village Edmonton Lumsden Town Bruderheim Town Lumsden Beach Resort Village Leduc County County (Municipality) Regina Beach Town Beaumont Town Saskatoon New Sarepta Village Thode Resort Village Leduc City Dundurn No. 314 Rural Municipality Devon Town Dundurn Town Calmar Town Shields Resort Village Sundance Beach Summer Village Corman Park No. 344 Rural Municipality Thorsby Village Saskatoon City Itaska Beach Summer Village Langham Town Golden Days Summer Village Warman Town Warburg Village Blucher No. 343 Rural Municipality Parkland County County (Municipality) Martensville Town Seba Beach Summer Village Bradwell Village Betula Beach Summer Village Allan Town Point Alison Summer Village Dalmeny Town Lakeview Summer Village Elstow Village Kapasiwin Summer Village Osler Town Wabamun Village Colonsay
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INTRODUCTION South African Periurban Land PERIURBAN
    INTRODUCTION • Practical policies, strategies and practices that PERIURBAN TENURE effectively integrate the urban, peri-urban and rural landscapes are critical MANAGEMENT IN • I will cover legislation and agriculture SOUTH AFRICA • Urban areas continually grow Michael Barry • Consume agricultural land in the process. – Impacts on food security University of Calgary • Urban sprawl unsustainable – Public transport subsidies greater than income – Health problems, unemployment and crime South African Periurban Land PERIURBAN ENVIRONMENT • In land proximate to urban areas, there is a mix • Apartheid city spatial structure of rural, industrial and urban land uses. • Upper income whites on residential small • Different land tenure practices, range from holdings where land is not utilised for food individual ownership to traditional African land production. tenure, with continuum of hybrids and adaptations – Inappropriate land use – tourism, illegal industry • Income levels, land values, land use and land – Land held for speculative purposes, and is sometimes deliberately stripped of its agricultural potential parcel sizes vary considerably – Security a major factor - crime impacts on personal – “Merc & manure”, commercial & subsistence farming, informal settlements, low cost housing, traditional safety as well as theft of product. areas – Providing services to smallholdings is costly Low Cost Housing and informal Traditional Areas settlements • Land tenure dynamics involve disparate overlapping • In areas where the urban area interfaces with claims and different power structures such as warlords, civics, traditional leaders. former African customary areas, groups have • Competing agendas for land use been known to split away from the main tribal • Informal settlements are often created by organised coalitions to create informal settlements. invasions or shack farming • Reluctance on the part of many traditional • 1.5 million houses built.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Kenneth Kaunda District Municipality Increased from 695 934 in 2011 to 742 822 in 2016
    DR KENNETH KAUNDA District NW Page 1 of 35 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 2. INTRODUCTION: BRIEF OVERVIEW ...................................................................... 5 2.1. Location ................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2. Historical Perspective............................................................................................................................ 5 2.3. Spatial Status ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.4. Land Ownership .................................................................................................................................... 6 3. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROFILE ........................................................................ 6 3.1. Key Social Demographics ...................................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1. Population.............................................................................................................................................. 6 3.1.2. Race Gender and Age ............................................................................................................................ 7 3.1.3. Households ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems
    NCES 2019 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates (EDGE) Program 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates (EDGE) Program 2017 Census of Governments, State Descriptions: School District Governments and Public School Systems JUNE 2019 Doug Geverdt National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education ii U.S. Department of Education Betsy DeVos Secretary Institute of Education Sciences Mark Schneider Director National Center for Education Statistics James L. Woodworth Commissioner Administrative Data Division Ross Santy Associate Commissioner The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting, analyzing, and reporting data related to education in the United States and other nations. It fulfills a congressional mandate to collect, collate, analyze, and report full and complete statistics on the condition of education in the United States; conduct and publish reports and specialized analyses of the meaning and significance of such statistics; assist state and local education agencies in improving their statistical systems; and review and report on education activities in foreign countries. NCES activities are designed to address high-priority education data needs; provide consistent, reliable, complete, and accurate indicators of education status and trends; and report timely, useful, and high-quality data to the U.S. Department of Education, Congress, states, other education policymakers, practitioners, data users, and the general public. Unless specifically noted, all information contained herein is in the public domain. We strive to make our products available in a variety of formats and in language that is appropriate to a variety of audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Sub National Implementation of Strategies and Action for Biodiversity Conservation
    Sub national Implementation of Strategies and Action for Biodiversity Conservation Regional Workshop for East, South and Southeast Asia on Cities and Biodiversity Qingdao, China 21st -24th May, 2014 Rajendra Dhungana Nepal Presentation Outline 1. Nepal and the Convention on Biological Diversity 2. Efforts for sub national implementation 3. Organizations involved in implementation 4. Results seen so far 5. Future plans Nepal and the CBD Nepal became party to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in1994 Focal Point of CBD in Nepal:- Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Nepal prepared: 1. Nepal Biodiversity Strategy (NBS), 2002 2. Nepal Biodiversity Strategy and Implementation Plan (NBSIP), 2006- 2010 3. Fifth National Report to CBD (2014) Is in the process of preparation of: Nepal Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) 2014-2020 Efforts for sub national implementation What has been done so far for sub national implementation ?? Sub national implementation of strategy 1. Environment Friendly Local Governance Framework, 2013 Has made the provision of formation of “Environmental Friendly Local Governance Committees” at different levels 1.1 Central Direction Committee •Vice-chairman, National Planning Commission (NPC) is the Chair •Relevant ministries, Municipality/Village Development Committee (VDC) association and Federation of Nepalese Chamber of Commerce and Industries (FNCCI) serve as the Members The committee provides direction and is the central coordinating body for sub national implementation Sub national implementation
    [Show full text]
  • Erie County Municipality Population Changes, 2000 to 2017
    Erie County Municipality Population Changes, 2000 to 2017 August, 2018 Erie County Department of Health 606 West 2nd Street Erie, PA 16507 Telephone: 814-451-6700 Website: ECDH This report was prepared by Jeff Quirk, Epidemiologist ([email protected]). The primary sources of data and information for this report are the Erie County Department of Health and the United States Census Bureau. Background: From 2000 to 2010, Erie County’s population remained level at around 280,000 residents. However, since 2010 the county’s population fell by over 6,000 residents, with losses occurring for the past five consecutive years (Figure 1). This report details the population changes that have taken place among the county’s 38 municipalities for the period 2000-2017. Figure 1 284,000 281,502 282,000 281,288 280,843 280,566 280,647 280,000 279,351 278,111 278,000 276,321 Population 276,000 274,541 274,000 272,000 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Erie County’s 38 municipalities include 2 cities, 14 boroughs, and 22 townships. These municipalities vary greatly in total population and size (land area). In 2017, municipality populations ranged from a low of 209 residents in Elgin Borough to a high of 97,369 in the City of Erie, while land areas ranged from a low of 0.3 square miles in Wattsburg Borough to a high of 50.0 in Waterford Township. From an overall numbers perspective, 12 municipalities increased in population since 2000 (Table 1, Figure 2). Harborcreek Township experienced the largest gain with an increase of 2,225 residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Cles Scholars on the Move
    INTERACTIVE NAVIGATION Editorial Dear Reader, It’s almost surreal that we are already in the third quarter of the year. With less than five months left of 2019, we certainly hope that you have had just as exciting, productive, informative and adventure-filled few months as the CLES-team has had. We are therefore glad to be able to let you in, in the second issue of CLES InPress, on the activities that went down here at CLES. As you will see, the CLES team has been travelling nationally and internationally, adding much value to our research. There have been many developments in the realm of cities, law, and environmental sustainability in the last few months. South Africa recently submitted its first Voluntary National Review (VNR) on its progress in the implementation of Agenda 2030 on Sustainable Development. Significant progress has been made on the implementation “We are excited for of SDG 11 in making the first CLES and cities and human SALGA Annual National settlements inclusive, Postgraduate Student safe, resilient, and sustainable. However, Conference ” the VNR points out that fragmentation remains an issue of concern. The City of Cape Town has been in the news for a variety that they are made up of warm bodies who see to the of reasons, including fighting for a right to purchase effective functioning of duties extending beyond mere power from independent power producers (IPPs) rather service delivery. It is often underestimated how much than solely from Eskom, and the drafting of a beach goes into the day-to-day functioning of municipalities by-law for the protection of its coastline.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge of Defining a National Urban Strategy in the Context of Divergent Demographic Trends in Small and Large Canadian Cities
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Western Washington University The challenge of defining a national urban strategy in the context of divergent demographic trends in small and large Canadian cities Gilles Viaud, Department of Geography, CURA – Quality of life indicator researcher, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada, V2C 5N3. Email: [email protected] Abstract: Once forgotten as an object of research, a growing literature dealing with various aspects of small cities has emerged since the new millennium. The answer to the question “does size matter?” has so far received positive empirical support on both sides of the Atlantic. Using the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) three quality of life studies as backdrop, this paper offers further evidence that small Canadian cities are worth our attention. Since 1999, FCM has extrapolated results from its series of quality of life studies carried out on a sample of large and medium sized cities to monitor key changes in the quality of life of Canadian urban residents. Conclusions drawn from these studies have been used to define a common Canadian municipal agenda which identifies air pollution, public transportation, affordable housing, homelessness, social inclusion and integration, and community safety and security as some of Canada’s key urban policy priorities. Following the evolution of a number of key demographic indicators in larger and smaller Canadian cities between 1996 and 2006, this research questions whether the municipal agenda derived from FCM’s quality of life studies offers a fair and just reflection of the reality and of the public policy priorities of smaller urban municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • County Regulation of Land Use and Development
    Volume 9 Issue 2 Spring 1969 Spring 1969 County Regulation of Land Use and Development Edward C. Walterscheid Recommended Citation Edward C. Walterscheid, County Regulation of Land Use and Development, 9 Nat. Resources J. 266 (1969). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol9/iss2/9 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. COUNTY REGULATION OF LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT In New Mexico, a county is "a body corporate and politic."' It should not be equated with a municipal corporation, being in the strictest sense distinguishable from such a corporation, but rather is more correctly termed a quasi-municipal corporation. It has only such powers as are expressly or impliedly given to it by constitutional or legislative provisions. 3 As originally adopted in 1911, the New Mexico Constitution was silent as to the powers of counties. In the ensuing years it has been amended to allow for the formation of two special types of counties constitutionally having powers at least as broad as those of municipalities. 4 However, only one specialized county has yet been authorized 4a-and no others appear likely in the near future-so that with this one exception all counties existing for the next few years are likely to remain dependent on legislative grants for their powers.5 By statute, all counties are empowered: First.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Amathole District Municipality
    SUSTAINED POOR AUDIT OUTCOMES: THE CASE OF THE AMATHOLE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY Jacobus S Wessels, Makhosandile H Kwaza and Edwin Ijeoma Sponsored by the European Union under the NSG's Public Service Training & Capacity Building Programme Disclaimer: 'This publication was produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union' 1 SUSTAINED POOR AUDIT OUTCOMES: THE CASE OF THE AMATHOLE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY Jacobus S Wessels1, Makhosandile H Kwaza2 and Edwin Ijeoma3 ABSTRACT It is generally accepted that reliable financial statements and credible reporting on the activities of government institutions are necessary for the continued improvement of their services to the public. Within the South African context, the Auditor-General of South Africa recently reported that only a few municipalities obtained clean audit reports. In fact, the drive towards clean municipal audit outcomes initiated by the South African government in 2009 evidently failed. Subsequently, this study set out to obtain a deepened understanding of why municipalities repeatedly fail to achieve clean audit outcomes. For this purpose, the Amathole District Municipality and its constituted local municipalities were selected as a case for this study. The reviewed material consisted of a rich collection of audit reports, annual reports, regulatory documents, and a wide variety of other official documents. In addition, the findings of a survey amongst municipal officials and councillors also informed this study. As a result, enduring and deep-rooted systemic leadership deficiencies, financial and performance management restraints, and ineffective and inefficient governance structures were revealed.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta, 2021 Province of Canada
    Quickworld Entity Report Alberta, 2021 Province of Canada Quickworld Factoid Name : Alberta Status : Province of Canada Active : 1 Sept. 1905 - Present Capital : Edmonton Country : Canada Official Languages : English Population : 3,645,257 - Permanent Population (Canada Official Census - 2011) Land Area : 646,500 sq km - 249,800 sq mi Density : 5.6/sq km - 14.6/sq mi Names Name : Alberta ISO 3166-2 : CA-AB FIPS Code : CA01 Administrative Subdivisions Census Divisions (19) Division No. 11 Division No. 12 Division No. 13 Division No. 14 Division No. 15 Division No. 16 Division No. 17 Division No. 18 Division No. 19 Division No. 1 Division No. 2 Division No. 3 Division No. 4 Division No. 5 Division No. 6 Division No. 7 Division No. 8 Division No. 9 Division No. 10 Towns (110) Athabasca Banff Barrhead Bashaw Bassano Beaumont Beaverlodge Bentley Black Diamond Blackfalds Bon Accord Bonnyville Bow Island Bowden Brooks Bruderheim Calmar Canmore Cardston Carstairs Castor Chestermere Claresholm Coaldale Coalhurst Cochrane Coronation Crossfield Crowsnest Pass Daysland Devon Didsbury Drayton Valley Drumheller Eckville Edson Elk Point Fairview Falher © 2019 Quickworld Inc. Page 1 of 3 Quickworld Inc assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this document. The information contained in this document is provided on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness or timeliness. Quickworld Entity Report Alberta, 2021 Province of Canada Fort MacLeod Fox Creek Gibbons Grande Cache Granum Grimshaw Hanna Hardisty High Level High Prairie High River Hinton Innisfail Killam Lac la Biche Lacombe Lamont Legal Magrath Manning Mayerthorpe McLennan Milk River Millet Morinville Mundare Nanton Okotoks Olds Oyen Peace River Penhold Picture Butte Pincher Creek Ponoka Provost Rainbow Lake Raymond Redcliff Redwater Rimbey Rocky Mountain House Sedgewick Sexsmith Slave Lake Smoky Lake Spirit River St.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Municipal Incorporation Proposals: Canadian Approaches and Considerations for the British Columbia Context
    Evaluating Municipal Incorporation Proposals: Canadian Approaches and Considerations for the British Columbia Context Monika Fedyczkowska, MPA candidate School of Public Administration University of Victoria July 2017 Client: Marijke Edmondson, Director of Local Government Structure Program Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Supervisor: Dr. Kimberly Speers School of Public Administration, University of Victoria Second Reader: Dr. Lynda Gagne, CPA (CGG) School of Public Administration, University of Victoria Chair: Dr. Bart Cunningham School of Public Administration, University of Victoria Acknowledgements I want to thank the Local Government Division of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing for bringing me back for a second co-op term to work on this project. My time as a co-op student in the Local Government Division stimulated my curiosity and nurtured my abilities as a graduate student and public servant. I am proud to contribute this report to the important work done in this Division. Thank you to all the Division staff. Special thanks to Karen Lynch and Marijke Edmonson for their supervision and for giving me meaningful work that challenged me and stirred my interest. Their mentorship has helped me to become more thoughtful, engaged, and effective. Many thanks are due to a dozen more individuals who engaged me about my project, offered suggestions and insights, and volunteered many hours to answering my questions and challenging my assumptions. My acknowledgements would be incomplete without mentioning the invaluable support of my family and my partner. Thank you for your limitless support and encouragement! [i] Executive Summary Introduction The Province of British Columbia (the Province) and communities work together to find the best local government structure to address community needs, preferences, and issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal/County/Local Governmental Immunity and Tort Liability in All 50 States
    MATTHIESEN, WICKERT & LEHRER, S.C. Hartford, WI ❖ New Orleans, LA ❖ Orange County, CA ❖ Austin, TX ❖ Jacksonville, FL Phone: (800) 637-9176 [email protected] www.mwl-law.com MUNICIPAL/COUNTY/LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY AND TORT LIABILITY IN ALL 50 STATES “Governmental immunity” concerns itself with the various legal doctrines or statutes that provide municipalities, local government entities, and political subdivisions immunity from tort-based claims, as well as exceptions from and limitations to that immunity. Generally, a state government is immune from tort suits by individuals under the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Local governments, municipalities (cities), counties, towns, and other political subdivisions of the state, however, are immune from tort suits by virtue of governmental immunity. This is because the state grants them immunity, usually in the state’s Constitution. This chart deals with governmental immunity and liability of municipal, county, and local government in all 50 states. It should be noted that lawsuits against local governmental entities, their officers, and employees are frequently asserted under federal law, e.g., 42 U.S.C. § 1983, or other similar statutes. This chart deals only with the separate body of law governing claims against local governments. It does not cover federal claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) (28 U.S.C. § 2674) or claims of negligence against state governments, the latter of which is the subject of another chart that can be found HERE. The broader doctrine of sovereign immunity traces its common law origins to the notion that the king made the laws, and thus anything the king did was perforce legal.
    [Show full text]