Department of Defense Office for the Administrative Review of the Detentionof Enemy Combatants at US Naval Base Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Department of Defense Office for the Administrative Review of the Detentionof Enemy Combatants at US Naval Base Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

UNCLASSIFIED Department of Defense Office for the Administrative Review of the Detentionof Enemy Combatants at US Naval Base Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 19 October 2005 TO : MADNI, HAFEZQARIMOHAMEDSAADIQBAL SUBJECT: UNCLASSIFIEDSUMMARYOF EVIDENCEFORADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWBOARDINTHECASEOF MADNI, HAFEZQARIMOHAMED SAADIQBAL 1. An Administrative Review Board will be convened to review your case to determine ifyour continued detention is necessary . 2. The AdministrativeReviewBoardwillconducta comprehensivereviewofall reasonably availableandrelevantinformationregardingyour case. At the conclusionof thisreviewthe Boardwill make a recommendationto: ( 1) releaseyouto yourhomestate; ( 2) transferyouto yourhomestate, withconditionsagreeduponby the UnitedStatesandyourhomestate; or (3) continueyourdetentionunderUnitedStatescontrol. 3. The following primary factors favor continued detention: a Commitment 1. The detainee asked anunidentified confidant where and with whom a United States government official would be onNew Year's Eve. 2. The detaineewantedto knowiftherewereprotectiveofficerswiththe government officialandifthey wereAmerican b . Connections/ Associations 1. An acquaintance ofthe detainee failed an attack onan American commercialairline in 2001. 2. Inmid -December 2001, the detainee speculated that something big was going to happen during a meeting with other al Qaida operatives. 3. The detainee had visited with members ofal Qaida in Jakarta, Indonesia. 4. A memberofthe detainee's was a leaderofthe female sectionofthe Al Ikhwan Al MuslimoonGroupinIndonesia. This group has beenidentified as an Islamicextremistgroup inAsia. c . Intent UNCLASSIFIED DMO Exhibit Page of2 UNCLASSIFIED SUBJECT : UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWBOARDINTHE CASEOFMADNI, HAFEZQARIMOHAMED SAADIQBAL The detainee stated that itwas better to kill one U.S. Government Official than 100 Americans d . DetaineeActionsandStatements The detaineeclaimedto bean al Qaidaoperative. e . Other RelevantData The detainee admitted traveling to Saudi Arabia, Egypt Afghanistan and many times to Pakistan 4. The following primary factors favor release or transfer : A 5. You will be afforded a meaningful opportunity to be heard and to present information to the Board ; this includes an opportunity to be physically present at the proceeding. The Assisting Military Officer ( AMO ) will assist you in reviewing all relevant and reasonably available unclassified information regarding your case. The AMO is not an advocate for or against continued detention , nor may the AMO form a confidential relationship with you or represent you in any other matter. UNCLASSIFIED Page 2 of 2.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Value of Claiming Torture: an Analysis of Al-Qaeda's Tactical Lawfare Strategy and Efforts to Fight Back, 43 Case W
Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 43 | Issue 1 2010 The alueV of Claiming Torture: An Analysis of Al- Qaeda's Tactical Lawfare Strategy and Efforts to Fight Back Michael J. Lebowitz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael J. Lebowitz, The Value of Claiming Torture: An Analysis of Al-Qaeda's Tactical Lawfare Strategy and Efforts to Fight Back, 43 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 357 (2010) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol43/iss1/22 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. File: Lebowitz 2 Created on: 1/9/2011 9:48:00 PM Last Printed: 4/5/2011 8:09:00 PM THE VALUE OF CLAIMING TORTURE: AN ANALYSIS OF AL-QAEDA’S TACTICAL LAWFARE STRATEGY AND EFFORTS TO FIGHT BACK Michael J. Lebowitz* I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 357 II. CLAIMING TORTURE TO SHAPE THE BATTLEFIELD .............................. 361 A. Tactical Lawfare ........................................................................... 362 B. Faux Torture ................................................................................. 364 C. The Torture Benchmark ...............................................................
[Show full text]
Egypt's Complicity in Torture and Extraordinary Renditions Nirmala Pillay* 1. Introduction Robert Baer, a Cia Agent, Exempl
CHAPTER TWELVE Egypt’s COMPLICITY IN TORTURE AND EXTRAORDINARY RENDITIONS Nirmala Pillay* 1. Introduction Robert Baer, a CIA agent, exemplified the importance of the Mubarak gov- ernment for US intelligence when he observed that “If you want serious interrogation you send a prisoner to Jordan, if you want them to be tor- tured, you send them to Syria. If you want someone to disappear . never to see them again . you send them to Egypt.”1 Hosni Mubarak enjoyed close ties with Western countries enabling the US, Canada, Britain, and Sweden to deport terrorist suspects to a regime that specialised in inter- rogation methods prohibited by international law. This chapter examines the implications of the fall of the Egyptian regime of Hosni Mubarak for the prohibition against torture, a jus cogens norm of international law. Torture theorist Darius Rejali argued in a major study, published in 1997, that torture was never really eliminated from democratic countries, so a change of regime in Egypt in favour of a demo- cratic form of governance is no guarantee that torture, an entrenched part of the Egyptian security regime, will necessarily abate. Rejali’s thesis is probed in the light of the revelations of extraordinary renditions of terror- ist suspects to Egypt and the implications of the Egyptian revolution for US and Egyptian collaboration in the “war on terror.” Extraordinary rendition is the practice of transferring terrorist sus- pects, “with the involvement of the US or its agents, to a foreign State in circumstances that make it more likely than not that the individual will be subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.”2 This * School of Law, Liverpool John Moores University, UK.
[Show full text]
Torture by Proxy: International and Domestic Law Applicable to “Extraordinary Renditions”
TORTURE BY PROXY: INTERNATIONAL AND DOMESTIC LAW APPLICABLE TO “EXTRAORDINARY RENDITIONS” The Committee on International Human Rights of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York and The Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, New York University School of Law © 2004 ABCNY & CHRGJ, NYU School of Law New York, NY Association of the Bar of the City of New York The Association of the Bar of the City of New York (www.abcny.org) was founded in 1870, and since then has been dedicated to maintaining the high ethical standards of the profession, promoting reform of the law, and providing service to the profession and the public. The Association continues to work for political, legal and social reform, while implementing innovating means to help the disadvantaged. Protecting the public’s welfare remains one of the Association’s highest priorities. Center for Human Rights and Global Justice The Center for Human Rights and Global Justice (CHRGJ) at NYU School of Law (http://www.nyuhr.org) focuses on issues related to “global justice,” and aims to advance human rights and respect for the rule of law through cutting-edge advocacy and scholarship. The CHRGJ promotes human rights research, education and training, and encourages interdisciplinary research on emerging issues in international human rights and humanitarian law. This report should be cited as: Association of the Bar of the City of New York & Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, Torture by Proxy: International and Domestic Law Applicable to “Extraordinary Renditions” (New York: ABCNY & NYU School of Law, 2004). - This report was modified in June 2006 - The Association of the Bar of the City of New York Committee on International Human Rights Martin S.
[Show full text]
Pmpt Ebsj 1Fozjltbbo
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | July 2011 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH H U M A N 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10118-3299 R I G H T S www.hrw.org WATCH Getting Away with Torture The Bush Administration and Mistreatment of Detainees An overwhelming amount of evidence now publically available indicates that senior US officials were involved in planning and authorizing abusive detention and interrogation practices amounting to torture following the September 11, 2001 attacks. Despite its obligation under both US and international law to prevent, investigate, and prosecute torture and other ill-treatment, the US government has still not properly investigated these allegations. Failure to investigate the potential criminal liability of these US officials has undermined US credibility internationally when it comes to promoting human rights and the rule of law. Getting Away with Torture: The Bush Administration and Mistreatment of Detainees combines past Human Rights Watch reporting with more recently available information. The report analyzes this information in the context of US and international law, and concludes that considerable evidence exists to warrant criminal investigations against four senior US officials: former President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and CIA Director George Tenet. Human Rights Watch calls for criminal investigations into their roles, and those of lawyers involved in the Justice Department memos authorizing unlawful treatment of detainees. In the absence of US action, it urges other United States | governments to exercise “universal jurisdiction” to prosecute US officials. It also calls for an independent nonpartisan commission to examine the role of the executive and other branches of government to ensure these practices do not occur again, and for the US to comply with obligations under the Convention against Torture to ensure that victims of torture receive fair and adequate compensation.
[Show full text]
I Would Like to Join Amnesty International. Copyright, but May Be Reproduced by Any Method Without Fee for Advocacy, Please Send Me Details
Close Guantánamo symbol of injustice undreds of men of many different nationalities have national security. Access to lawyers is perceived as Hbeen transported to the USA’s offshore prison camp detrimental to the interrogation process. Access to the at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. At every stage of their ordeal, courts is seen as disruptive of military operations. their dignity, humanity and Arbitrary detention has been the result. “The United States Government will work to fundamental rights have advance human dignity in word and deed, been denied. Five years on, hundreds of men are still held in Guantánamo. None has been tried. None has appeared speaking out for freedom and against The first detainees were in court. All, in Amnesty International’s opinion, are violations of human rights.” flown from Afghanistan to unlawfully detained. Many have been tortured or ill- National Security Strategy of the USA, March 2002 Guantánamo in January 2002 treated, whether in Afghanistan or elsewhere prior to – hooded, shackled and tied their transfer to Guantánamo, or during their transfer, or down like cargo. They were the first of more than 750 as part of the interrogation process in the base, or just people of some 45 nationalities who would be taken to through the harshness of the Guantánamo regime – the base in this way, among them children as young as 13. isolating, indefinite and punitive. By association, their They have included people who were simply in the wrong families too have suffered the cruelty of this virtually place at the wrong time, dozens of whom were handed incommunicado island incarceration.
[Show full text]
Exhibits Attached to Arguments on Admissibility, Declaration of Mohammed Abdullah Saleh Al-Asad, and Declaration of Zahra Ahmed Mohamed
BEFORE THE AFRICAN COMMISSION FOR HUMAN & PEOPLES’ RIGHTS 49th ORDINARY SESSION: APRIL-MAY 2011 COMMUNICATION NO. 383/2010 In the matter between: MOHAMMED ABDULLAH SALEH AL-ASAD and DJIBOUTI EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO ARGUMENTS ON ADMISSIBILITY, DECLARATION OF MOHAMMED ABDULLAH SALEH AL-ASAD, AND DECLARATION OF ZAHRA AHMED MOHAMED EXHIBITS The United Republic of Tanzania Departure Declaration Card, 27 December 2003…….A Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, On the Record: U.S. Disclosures on Rendition, Secret Detention, and Coercive Interrogation (New York: NYU School of Law, 2008)………………………………………………………………………………..B Letter to the Attorney General of Djibouti, 31 March 2009…….….…..…….…….….…C United Nations Human Rights Council, 13th Session, Joint Study on Global Practices in Relation to Secret Detention in the Context of Countering Terrorism, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/13/42 (19 February 2010)………………………………………………………. D Republic v. Director of Immigration Services, ex parte Mohammed al-Asad (Habeas Corpus petition), High Court of Tanzania, 17 June 2004………………………………...E Amnesty International, United States of America: Below the radar- Secret flights to torture and ‘disappearance,’ 5 April 2006……………………………………………….F Prepared Remarks of Treasury Secretary John Snow to Announce Joint U.S. and Saudi Action Against Four Branches of Al-Haramain in the Financial War on Terror, JS-1107, 22 January 2004…………………………………………………………………………..G Henry Lyimo, Guardian (Dar es Salaam), Yemenis, Italians Expelled, 30 December 2003…………………………………………………………………………………...….H Roderick Ndomba, Daily News (Dar es Salaam), Dar Deports 2,367 Aliens, 30 December 2003……...……………………………..………………………………………………….I International Committee of the Red Cross, ICRC Report on the Treatment of Fourteen “High Value Detainees” in CIA Custody, 2007…………………………..……….……...J International Seismological Centre Earthquake Data…………………………………….K U.S.
[Show full text]
Below the Radar - Secret Flights to Torture and ‘Disappearance’
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. The US rendition programme ................................................................................ 2 1.1 Renditions ....................................................................................................... 2 1.2 ‘Diplomatic assurances’................................................................................... 3 1.3 Establishment of the US rendition programme ................................................. 4 1.4 Rendition practice since September 2001......................................................... 6 1.5 Pakistan........................................................................................................... 7 1.6 Torture, ill-treatment and ‘disappearance’: violations of international law........ 8 1.7 Secret detentions and secret transfers: the case of Muhammad Bashmilah, Salah Qaru and Muhammad al-Assad.............................................................................. 9 1.8 Transfer to torture: the case of Muhammad Zammar.......................................17 1.9 A practice predating 2001: the case of Abdul Rahman al-Yaf’i .......................19 2. Planes and airports – the support network for rendition flights..............................22 2.1 International aviation law and renditions.........................................................22 2.2 CIA-front companies ......................................................................................23 2.3 Other US agencies involved in rendition.........................................................24
[Show full text]
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS # Introduction - All detainees and prisoners have rights .......................... 1 # The USA’s stated commitment to international law and standards ................ 7 # Human rights safeguards circumvented - the urgent need for habeas corpus ....... 11 # US responsibilities relating to detainees in Afghan and Pakistani custody ........... 15 # The investigation into killings and alleged ill-treatment of detainees by US soldiers .... 17 # Concerns over identification of detainees, and their access to family .............. 22 # The interrogation of detainees and denial of access to counsel .................. 26 # The status of detainees captured in connection to the conflict in Afghanistan ........ 29 # The conditions of transfer to, and detention in, Guantánamo Bay ................. 32 # Undermining the presumption of innocence ................................ 37 # The principle of non-refoulement and the right to seek asylum ................. 40 # The prospect of indefinite detention without trial or after acquittal ................ 42 # The threat of trials by military commission ................................. 44 # The death penalty .................................................. 58 # Conclusion and recommendations ....................................... 59 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Memorandum to the US Government on the rights of people in US custody in Afghanistan and Guantánamo Bay “The United States cannot expect to reap the benefits of internationally recognized human rights – in the form of greater worldwide
[Show full text]
Asian Strategic Review 2016 Editors Muni • Chadha 5 3 8 8 4 7 2 Eforms 8 ` 995 1 8 8 7 9 ISBN 978-81-8274-883-5 Ractices
For nearly forty years, Professor S.D Muni taught, The emerging trends of terrorism in Asia have in the conducted and supervised research, in international recent past challenged the conventional wisdom that relations and South Asian Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru Asian Strategic Review dictated and defined violence by non-state actors. Other Titles from IDSA University (1974-2006), National University of This, as the chapters in this volume suggest, is Singapore (2008-2013), Banaras Hindu University Core Concerns in Indian Defence and the Imperatives for Reforms illustrated by its distinct characteristics, forcing the (1985-86), and University of Rajasthan (1972-73). At Vinod Misra ASIAN world at large to grapple with these threats, including Jawaharlal Nehru University he held the prestigious ISBN 978-81-8274-818-7 volunteers from countries that had remained isolated Appadorai Chair of International Politics and Area from the contagion until now. Emerging Strategic Trends in Asia Studies. Prof. Muni also served as India's Special Uttam Kumar Sinha Various facets of the challenge from the Islamic State Envoy on UNSC Reforms (2005) and Ambassador in ISBN 978-81-8274-823-1 STRATEGIC (IS) and the unfolding contours of terrorism in Asia, Lao People's Democratic Republic (1997-99). In 2005 have been analysed and written about in the past. he was bestowed with 'Sri Lanka Ratna', Sri Lanka's Asian Strategic Review 2014 S D Muni and Vivek Chadha Most of the perspectives have, however, been highest honour for a foreign national. In October 2014, ISBN 978-81-8274-769-2 Western, with a sprinkling of Asian views.
[Show full text]
Getting Away with Torture RIGHTS the Bush Administration and Mistreatment of Detainees WATCH
United States HUMAN Getting Away with Torture RIGHTS The Bush Administration and Mistreatment of Detainees WATCH Getting Away with Torture The Bush Administration and Mistreatment of Detainees Copyright © 2011 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-789-2 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org July 2011 ISBN: 1-56432-789-2 Getting Away with Torture The Bush Administration and Mistreatment of Detainees Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 12 I. Background: Official Sanction for Crimes against Detainees .......................................... 13 II. Torture of Detainees in US Counterterrorism Operations ............................................... 18 The CIA Detention Program .......................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Extraordinary Rendition in Us Counterterrorism Policy
EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION IN U.S. COUNTERTERRORISM POLICY: THE IMPACT ON TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND OVERSIGHT AND THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EUROPE OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION APRIL 17, 2007 Serial No. 110–28 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 34–712PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS TOM LANTOS, California, Chairman HOWARD L. BERMAN, California ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American DAN BURTON, Indiana Samoa ELTON GALLEGLY, California DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey DANA ROHRABACHER, California BRAD SHERMAN, California DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois ROBERT WEXLER, Florida EDWARD R. ROYCE, California ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York STEVE CHABOT, Ohio BILL DELAHUNT, Massachusetts THOMAS G. TANCREDO, Colorado GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York RON PAUL, Texas DIANE E. WATSON, California JEFF FLAKE, Arizona ADAM SMITH, Washington JO ANN DAVIS, Virginia RUSS CARNAHAN, Missouri MIKE PENCE, Indiana JOHN S. TANNER, Tennessee THADDEUS G. MCCOTTER, Michigan LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California JOE WILSON, South Carolina SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas RUBE´ N HINOJOSA, Texas J. GRESHAM BARRETT, South Carolina DAVID WU, Oregon CONNIE MACK, Florida BRAD MILLER, North Carolina JEFF FORTENBERRY, Nebraska LINDA T.
[Show full text]
NO MORE EXCUSES WATCH a Roadmap to Justice for CIA Torture
HUMAN RIGHTS NO MORE EXCUSES WATCH A Roadmap to Justice for CIA Torture No More Excuses A Roadmap to Justice for CIA Torture Copyright © 2015 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-2996 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org NOVEMBER 2015 978-1-62313-2996 No More Excuses A Roadmap to Justice for CIA Torture Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Methodology .................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]