<<

Official Journal C 21 of the European Union

Volume 64 English edition Information and Notices 20 January 2021

Contents

II Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 21/01 Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10030 — Ube Industries/Mitsubishi Materials Corporation/JV) (1) ...... 1

2021/C 21/02 Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10021 — Netcompany/Copenhagen Airports/ SMARTER AIRPORTS JV) (1) ...... 2

IV Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 21/03 Euro exchange rates — 19 January 2021 ...... 3

2021/C 21/04 Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (OJ C 396, 30.12.2006) (1) ...... 4

Court of Auditors

2021/C 21/05 Special Report 1/2021 – ‘Resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism’ ...... 5

EN (1) Text with EEA relevance. V Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 21/06 Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10096 — Invitalia/ArcelorMittal/AM InvestCo) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) ...... 6

2021/C 21/07 Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10024 — Blackstone/Winoa) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) ...... 8

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2021/C 21/08 Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 ...... 9

(1) Text with EEA relevance. 20.1.2021 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Uni on C 21/1

II

(Information)

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10030 — Ube Industries/Mitsubishi Materials Corporation/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 21/01)

On 13 January 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available: — in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, — in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10030. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1. C 21/2 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 20.1.2021

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10021 — Netcompany/Copenhagen Airports/SMARTER AIRPORTS JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 21/02)

On 14 January 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available: — in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, — in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10021. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1. 20.1.2021 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Uni on C 21/3

IV

(Notices)

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Euro exchange rates (1) 19 January 2021

(2021/C 21/03)

1 euro =

Currency Exchange rate Currency Exchange rate

USD US dollar 1,2132 CAD Canadian dollar 1,5438 JPY Japanese yen 126,16 HKD Hong Kong dollar 9,4052 DKK Danish krone 7,4393 NZD New Zealand dollar 1,7020 GBP Pound sterling 0,89100 SGD Singapore dollar 1,6114 KRW Korean won 1 337,54 SEK Swedish krona 10,0953 ZAR South African rand 18,1181 CHF Swiss franc 1,0769 CNY Chinese yuan renminbi 7,8610 ISK Iceland króna 157,00 HRK Croatian kuna 7,5655 NOK Norwegian krone 10,3423 IDR Indonesian rupiah 17 080,95 BGN Bulgarian lev 1,9558 MYR Malaysian ringgit 4,9135 CZK Czech koruna 26,161 PHP Philippine peso 58,251 HUF Hungarian forint 358,52 RUB Russian rouble 89,4400 PLN Polish zloty 4,5352 THB Thai baht 36,426 RON Romanian leu 4,8744 BRL Brazilian real 6,3848 TRY Turkish lira 9,0257 MXN Mexican peso 23,7870 AUD Australian dollar 1,5723 INR Indian rupee 88,7525

(1) Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB. C

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to 21/4 Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance) EN (2021/C 21/04)

Decisions granting an authorisation

Reference of the Holder of the Authorisation Date of expiry of review Date of decision Substance name Authorised use Reasons for the decision decision (1) authorisation number period

C(2021) 47 13 January 2021 Pitch, coal tar, high ArianeGroup, REACH/21/1/0 Industrial use of CTPht as 4 October 2032 In accordance with Arti­ Offi temp. 11 quai André precursor of carbon matrix in cle 60(4) of Regulation cial Citroën, the manufacturing of ther­ (EC) No 1907/2006, the EC No 266-028-2; 75015 Paris, mally and thermo-mechani­ socio-economic benefits Jour CAS No 65996-93-2 cally highly loaded carbon/ outweigh the risk to nal carbon parts including noz­ human health from the zle throats and other critical use of the substance and of carbon-carbon composite there are no suitable the

parts, resistant to very harsh alternative substances or European erosion conditions, and very technologies. high temperature ranges, dedicated to high perfor­

mance civilian and military Uni

aerospace launchers on (1) The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm 20.1.2021

(1) OJ L 396, 30.12.2006 , p. 1 20.1.2021 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Uni on C 21/5

COURT OF AUDITORS

Special Report 1/2021 ‘Resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism’

(2021/C 21/05)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report 1/2021 ‘Resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu C 21/6 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 20.1.2021

V

(Announcements)

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10096 — Invitalia/ArcelorMittal/AM InvestCo) Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 21/06)

1. On 6 January 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

— Agenzia nazionale per l’attrazione degli investimenti e lo sviluppo d’impresa S.p.A. (‘Invitalia’, Italy),

— ArcelorMittal S.A. (‘ArcelorMittal’, Luxembourg),

— AM InvestCo Italy S.p.A. (‘AM InvestCo’, Italy), controlled by ArcelorMittal.

Invitalia and ArcelorMittal acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of AM InvestCo.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

— for Invitalia: an Italian national agency for inward investment and economic development, currently controlling several businesses active in the sectors of telecommunications infrastructure, banking, tourism and urban development,

— for ArcelorMittal: a global steel and mining company, whose principal business is the production, distribution, marketing, and sale of steel products for various applications including automotive, construction, household appliances, and packaging. It produces a range of steel semi-finished and finished products, including flat and long carbon steel products,

— for AM InvestCo: a subsidiary of ArcelorMittal, which controls certain Italian steel business units owned by the Ilva Group active in the production, processing and distribution of flat carbon steel products and welded steel tubes.

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’). 20.1.2021 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Uni on C 21/7

3. On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4. The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10096 — Invitalia/ArcelorMittal/AM InvestCo

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: [email protected]

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission Directorate-General for Competition Merger Registry 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel BELGIQUE/BELGIË

(2) OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5. C 21/8 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 20.1.2021

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10024 — Blackstone/Winoa) Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 21/07)

1. On 11 January 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). This notification concerns the following undertakings: — The Blackstone Group Inc. (United States of America), (‘Blackstone’), — Winoa SA (France), (‘Winoa’).

Blackstone acquire(s) within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Winoa.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: — for Blackstone: global alternative asset management, — for Winoa: production and sale of metallic abrasives.

3. On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4. The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10024 — Blackstone/Winoa

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: [email protected]

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission Directorate-General for Competition Merger Registry 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel BELGIQUE/BELGIË

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’). (2) OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5. 20.1.2021 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Uni on C 21/9

OTHER ACTS

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to a product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

(2021/C 21/08)

This communication is published in accordance with Article 17(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (1).

COMMUNICATION OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT TO THE SINGLE DOCUMENT

‘CÔTES DU RHÔNE VILLAGES’

PDO-FR-A0664-AM05

Date of communication: 5 November 2020

DESCRIPTION OF AND REASONS FOR THE APPROVED AMENDMENT

1. Introduction of a new complementary geographical name In point II of Chapter I of the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Côtes du Rhône Villages’, ‘Nyons’ has been added as a new complementary geographical name. This complementary geographical name is an optional labelling term. The amendment also affects points III (product types and colours) and IV (geographical area) of the specification. In point 9 ‘Other essential conditions’ of the single document, an additional labelling provision has been added regarding the complementary geographical name ‘Nyons’.

SINGLE DOCUMENT

1. Product name Côtes du Rhône Villages

2. Geographical indication type PDO - Protected designation of origin

3. Categories of grapevine product 1. Wine

4. Description of the wine(s)

Red, rosé and white wines The wines are still and dry (with a fermentable sugar content not exceeding 4 g/l). Red and rosé wines account for the bulk of production (98 %). The wines are round and generous with good colour intensity. They are suited to ageing for varying lengths of time depending on the soil type and the blend of varieties, as determined by producers based on their expertise.

(1) OJ L 9, 11.1.2019, p. 2. C 21/10 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 20.1.2021

The N variety makes up at least 40 % of the blends, in combination with Syrah N and/or Mourvèdre N, which, as main varieties, account for at least 25 % of the variety mix.

The white wines are round in the mouth, sometimes with notes of spices and vanilla.

The wines must have a natural alcoholic strength by volume of at least 12 %.

The red wines have a malic acid content of less than 0,4 g/l.

The other analytical criteria are in line with EU rules.

General analytical characteristics

Maximum total alcoholic strength (in % volume) 14,5

Minimum actual alcoholic strength (in % volume)

Minimum total acidity

Maximum volatile acidity (in milliequivalents per litre) 16,33

Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

5. Wine-making practices

a. Specific oenological practices

Oenological practices

Specific oenological practice

— Subtractive enrichment techniques are permitted for the red wines up to a concentration rate of 10 %;

— To produce the rosé wines, winemakers are permitted to use oenological charcoal exclusively on press musts, without exceeding 20 % of the total volume made into wine by the operator for that harvest.

Spacing between rows and plants

Growing method

— The spacing between rows is 2,50 m or less;

— The area available for each plant is up to 2,5 m2, calculated by multiplying the distance between rows and the space between plants in the same row;

— The spacing between plants in the same row is between 0,80 m and 1,25 m.

Pruning – General provisions

Growing method

— The vines are pruned short (using the Gobelet or Cordon de Royat method), with a maximum of six spurs per plant. Each spur has a maximum of two buds;

— The period for establishing the cordon is limited to 2 years. During this period, single or double Guyot pruning is allowed as defined below for the Viognier B variety.

Pruning – Special provision

Growing method

The Viognier B variety may be pruned:

— either using the single Guyot method, with a maximum of eight buds on the rod and one or two spurs with a maximum of two buds on each spur;

— or using the double Guyot method, with a maximum of six buds on each rod and one or two spurs with a maximum of two buds on each spur. 20.1.2021 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union C 21/11

Irrigation

Growing method

Irrigation may be permitted.

Growing methods to preserve the characteristics of the physical and biological environment

Growing method

— Plastic mulching is prohibited;

— No substantial alterations may be made to the shape and contours of the landscape or the natural pedological sequence of parcels intended for production of wine bearing the registered designation of origin.

b. Maximum yields

50 hectolitres per hectare

6. Demarcated geographical area

The grapes are harvested and the wines are made and developed in the following municipalities:

— Department of Ardèche: Bourg-Saint-Andéol, Saint-Just-d’Ardèche, Saint-Marcel-d’Ardèche, Saint-Martin-d’Ardèche;

— Department of Drôme: Bouchet, Mérindol-les-Oliviers, Mirabel-aux-Baronnies, Mollans-sur-Ouvèze, Montbrison, Nyons, (Le) Pègue, Piégon, Rochegude, Rousset-les-Vignes, Saint-Maurice-sur-Eygues, Saint-Pantaléon-les-Vignes, Suze-la-Rousse, Taulignan, Tulette, Venterol, Vinsobres;

— Department of : Aiguèze, Bagnols-sur-Cèze, Castillon-du-Gard, , , , Comps, , , Estézargues, Fournès, Gaujac, Laudun, , , Pont-Saint-Esprit, , Rochefort- du-Gard, Sabran, Saint-Alexandre, Saint-Etienne-des-Sorts, Saint-Gervais, Saint-Hilaire-d’Ozilhan, Saint-Marcel-de- Careiret, Saint-Michel-d’, Saint-Nazaire, Saint-Pons-la-Calm, Saint-Victor-la-Coste, Sauveterre, , , Valliguières, Vénéjan;

— Department of Vaucluse: Beaumes-de-Venise, Bédarrides, Bollène, Buisson, Cairanne, Camaret-sur-Aigues, Caumont- sur-, Châteauneuf-de-Gadagne, Courthézon, Faucon, Grillon, Jonquières, La Roque-Alric, Lafare, Lagarde- Paréol, Mondragon, Morières-lès-, Orange, Piolenc, Puyméras, Rasteau, Richerenches, Roaix, Sablet, Saint- Marcellin-lès-Vaison, Saint-Romain-en-Viennois, Saint-Roman-de-Malegarde, Saint-Saturnin-lès-Avignon, Sainte- Cécile-les-Vignes, Séguret, Sérignan-du-Comtat, Sorgues, Suzette, Travaillan, Uchaux, Vaison-la-Romaine, Valréas, Vedène, Villedieu, Violès, Visan.

7. Main wine grape variety(-ies)

Clairette B

Grenache N

Grenache Blanc B

Marsanne B

Roussanne B

Viognier B

8. Description of the link(s)

The geographical area extends between Montélimar and Avignon, across four departments in the southern part of the Rhône valley. The river Rhône runs right through the area, providing an essential link to the outside world.

During the Tertiary era, the Rhône valley was a Mediterranean ‘fjord’ extending as far as Vienne. As the sea receded, during the Quaternary era, the landscape acquired its current features through the effect of erosion (rain, , fluvial erosion). As a result, the landscape is dominated by slopes and terraces. The types of soil vary greatly and include river terraces, marns and soft limestone as well as soils created by erosion (marns, sand, sandstone or molasse). C 21/12 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 20.1.2021

The climate of the southern Rhône valley is Mediterranean with hot, dry summers and low annual rainfall. It rains mainly in autumn and in late winter. The climate is also strongly influenced by the , a dry and often violent northerly . The Mistral blows for 120 days a year on average, clearing the sky and ensuring plenty of sunshine. The mountains and hills framing the valley create a corridor effect that reinforces wind speeds (Rhône corridor Venturi effect).

The vineyards of the Rhône valley came into their own during the 18th century, and in the late 18th and the 19th century winegrowing expanded along the left river bank. In 1864, Napoleon III commissioned Jules Guyot, an agronomist, to write a report on the state and future of French vineyards. Guyot used the term ‘Côtes du Rhône’ (in the plural) to describe the vineyards extending from Saint-Gilles to Tournon via Beaucaire. The proximity of the Rhône meant that the wines had good access to markets.

Winegrowing became a major source of income. This position of strength led to recognition of ‘Côtes du Rhône’ as a registered designation of origin as from 1937.

Following on from this, producers expressed a wish to be able promote their best wines using specific geographical names. This led to the recognition, in 1966, of the possibility of combining the ‘Côtes du Rhône’ designation of origin with the names of a number of municipalities to specify the origin of the grapes, reflecting the reputation the wines had acquired. Then, in 1967, the ‘Côtes du Rhône Villages’ registered designation of origin was recognised. These efforts to organise production in a ‘pyramid’ structure encouraged the recognition of geographical units to complement the ‘Côtes du Rhône Villages’ registered designation of origin.

Some 350 000 hectolitres, including 5 000 hectolitres of white wine, were produced in 2010.

The wines are still and dry. Reds and rosés account for the bulk of production. The wines are round and generous with good colour intensity. They are suited to ageing for varying lengths of time depending on the soil type (sandy or sandy- loamy soils give lighter wines and stony or clayey soils richer, tannic wines) and on the blend of varieties, as determined by producers based on their expertise.

The wines are produced by blending the Grenache N variety with Syrah N or Mourvèdre N. At least 66 % of the blend is made up of these three main varieties. The white wines (accounting for 2 % of production) are round in the mouth, sometimes with notes of spices and vanilla.

The wines are made from grapes grown on carefully selected parcels in the ‘Côtes du Rhône’ production area. They are a particular and genuine expression of the natural and human potential associated with wines from the Rhône valley.

The wines produced thus bear witness to and are the result of a ‘unique diversity’ that producers have been able to harness, adapting the variety mix and selecting the best plots to take advantage of the favourable climate and the presence of the Rhône.

The Rhône valley has a climate well suited to growing vines, due both to the ‘cleansing’ effect of the Mistral, the violent, cold and dry wind that protects the vines from cryptogamic diseases, and to the good ripening conditions for the grapes, also linked to the frequent Mistral winds, of abundant sunshine and just the right level and concentration of rainfall.

Since the time of Greek colonisation the Rhône valley has provided a major maritime and later rail and land route for the wine trade, thus allowing a proud winegrowing tradition to be upheld for more than two millennia.

9. Essential further conditions (packaging, labelling, other requirements)

Area in immediate proximity

Legal framework:

National legislation

Type of further condition:

Derogation concerning production in the demarcated geographical area

Description of the condition: 20.1.2021 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union C 21/13

The area in immediate proximity, defined by derogation for the making and development of the wines, is made up of the territory of:

— 66 municipalities in the department of Ardèche: Alboussière, , , , Arras-sur-Rhône, , , Bidon, , , Champagne, Champis, Charmes-sur-Rhône, , Châteaubourg, , Colombier-le-Cardinal, , , Etables, Félines, , Gilhac-et-Bruzac, , Guilherand-Granges, Gras, Labastide-de-Virac, Lemps, , , Ozon, , , , , , , Saint-Barthélemy-le-Plain, Saint-Cierge-la-Serre, Saint-Cyr, Saint Désirat, Saint Etienne de Valoux, Saint-Georges-les- Bains, Saint-Jean-de Muzols, Saint-Julien-en-Saint-Alban, Saint-Laurent-du-Pape, Saint-Montan, Saint-Péray, Saint- Remèze, Saint-Romain-d’Ay, Saint-Romain-de-Lerps, Saint-Symphorien-sous-Chomérac, Saint-Vincent-de-Durfort, Sarras, , Sécheras, Serrières, , , , , Tournon-sur-Rhône, Vernosc-les- , , Vion, La Voulte;

— 64 municipalities in the department of Drôme: Albon, Aleyrac, Allex, Ambonil, Andancette, Aubres, La Baume-de- Transit, Beaumont-Monteux, Beausemblant, Benivay-Ollon, Bourg-les-Valence, Chanos-Curson, Chantemerle-les- Blés, Châteauneuf-de-Bordette, Châteauneuf-sur-Isère, Chavannes, Clérieux, Colonzelle, Condorcet, Crozes- Hermitage, Donzère, Erôme, Etoile-sur-Rhône, La Garde-Adhémar, Gervans, Grane, Granges-les-Beaumont, Les Granges-Gontardes, Grignan, Larnage, La Roche-de-Glun, Laveyron, Livron-sur-Drôme, Loriol-sur-Drôme, Mercurol, Montjoux, Montoison, Montségur-sur-Lauzon, La Motte-de-Galaure, La Penne-sur-l’Ouvèze, Les Pilles, Pierrelatte, Pierrelongue, Le Poët-Laval, Ponsas, Pont-de-l’Isère, Propiac, Roche-Saint-Secret-Béconne, Roussas, Saint- Barthélemy-de-Vals, Saint-Gervais-sur-Roubion, Saint-Paul-Trois-Châteaux, Saint-Rambert-d’Albon, Saint-Restitut, Saint-Uze, Saint-Vallier, Salles-sous-Bois, Serves-sur-Rhône, Solérieux, Tain-l’Hermitage, Teyssières, Triors, Valence, Veaunes;

— 40 municipalities in the department of Gard: Les Angles, Aramon, La Bastide-d’Engras, La Capelle-et-Masmolène, , , , , , , Jonquières-Saint-Vincent, Laval-Saint-Roman, Le Pin, , , Montfaucon, La Roque-sur-Cèze, , , , Roquemaure, Saint-André- d’Olérargues, Saint-André-de-Roquepertuis, Saint-Bonnet-du-Gard, Saint-Christol-de-Rodières, Saint-Geniès-de- Comolas, Saint-Julien-de-Peyrolas, Saint-Laurent-de-Carnols, Saint-Laurent-des-Arbres, Saint-Laurent-la-Vernède, Saint-Paul-les-Fonts, Saint-Paulet-de-Caisson, , , Tavel, Théziers, , , Vers-Pont-du- Gard, Villeneuve-lès-Avignon;

— 12 municipalities in the department of Isère: Chonas-l’Amballan, Le-Péage-de-Roussillon, Reventin-Vaugris, Les Roches-de-Condrieu, Sablons, Saint-Alban-du-Rhône, Saint-Clair-du-Rhône, Saint-Maurice-l’Exil, Salaise-sur-Sanne, Seyssuel, Vienne.

Supplementary geographical names

Legal framework:

National legislation

Type of further condition:

Additional provisions relating to labelling

Description of the condition:

The name of the registered designation of origin may be followed by one of the complementary geographical names listed below if the wines meet the production requirements laid down in the specification for these names:

— ‘Chusclan’

— ‘Gadagne’

— ‘Laudun’

— ‘Massif d’Uchaux’

— ‘Nyons’

— ‘Plan de Dieu’

— ‘Puyméras’

— ‘Roaix’

— ‘Rochegude’ C 21/14 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union 20.1.2021

— ‘Rousset-les-Vignes’ — ‘Sablet’ — ‘Saint-Andéol’ — ‘Saint-Gervais’ — ‘Saint-Maurice’ — ‘Saint-Pantaléon-les-Vignes’ — ‘Sainte-Cécile’ — ‘Séguret’ — ‘Signargues’ — ‘Suze-la-Rousse’ — ‘Vaison-la-Romaine’ — ‘Valréas’ — ‘Visan’. Broader geographical unit Legal framework: National legislation Type of further condition: Additional provisions relating to labelling Description of the condition: The labels of wines bearing the registered designation of origin ‘Côtes du Rhône Villages’ may specify the larger geographical unit ‘Vignobles de la Vallée du Rhône’ under the conditions set out in the agreement signed between the protection and management bodies concerned.

Link to the product specification

http://info.agriculture.gouv.fr/gedei/site/bo-agri/document_administratif-5f363739-d2b7-4d40-83a3-8d27c2dc6ff9

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition) ISSN 1725-2423 (paper edition)

EN