Exploring the Dynamics of Blog Communities: the Case of Metafilter Leiser Silva*, Lakshmi Goel† & Elham Mousavidin‡ *C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exploring the Dynamics of Blog Communities: the Case of Metafilter Leiser Silva*, Lakshmi Goel† & Elham Mousavidin‡ *C doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2008.00304.x Info Systems J (2008) 19, 55–81 55 Exploring the dynamics of blog communities: the case of MetaFilter Leiser Silva*, Lakshmi Goel† & Elham Mousavidin‡ *C. T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, USA, email: [email protected], †C. T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, USA, email: [email protected], and ‡[email protected] Abstract. This paper explores the social processes and mechanisms that give form to a prominent type of online community: community blogs. We conducted an interpretive study that examines a particular community blog, MetaFilter, by drawing on the concepts of communities of practice as a theoretical lens. Theo- retically, we contribute to the body of knowledge of online communities by identi- fying the structures of an emergent type of community that is brought together by blog technology. Our findings suggest that cohesion in a community blog is brought about by the following practices: (a) explicit ground rules regarding mem- bership, (b) presence of moderators, (c) availability of profile information, (d) ‘net etiquette’, (e) tacit warrants for discerning pertinent posts, and (f) the deployment of specific techniques of discipline. Keywords: blogs, communities of practice, knowledge management, Web 2.0, virtual communities, interpretive research INTRODUCTION The advent of the internet has created new venues for communication and social exchanges. These venues, such as forums and newsgroups, are the focal point for the creation of new types of interactions among individuals that take the form of virtual communities (Komito, 1998; Etzioni & Etzioni, 1999; Bakardjieva & Feenberg, 2002; Wilson & Peterson, 2002). Yet, despite the fact that the total number of these electronically enabled communities grows almost exponentially, little is known about the mechanisms and processes that shape them (Ridings et al., 2002). Hence, the purpose of this paper is to explore the social dynamics that provide identity and cohesion to a prominent new type of online community: a blog community. A weblog (or blog) is a self-publishing website that is updated on a regular basis. The word ‘blog’ has been defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as ‘a web site that contains an online personal journal with reflections, comments and often hyperlinks’ and has been identi- fied as the most looked-up word in the year 2004 (BBCNews, 2004). Approximately 70 million blogs were being tracked in March 2007 by Technorati, a real-time search engine that © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 56 L Silva et al. maintains updated information on blogs, with 120 000 new blogs being created every day. Contents of a blog are written in a casual manner and are archived reverse chronologically (Blood, 2002). The posts are usually brief, with links to other blogs or websites on the internet. The particular style of writing and publishing in blogs can be classified as a communication genre (Orlikowski & Yates, 1994; Herring et al., 2005). A genre in this sense is constituted by typified acts of communication. Herring et al. (2005) distinguish weblogs from other internet- related genres such as webpages and chat rooms. Weblogs are different given that their communication acts are asynchronous and asymmetrical. They are asynchronous because communications do not occur in real time as with instant messaging (IM) and chat rooms. They are asymmetrical because communications do not occur in dyads as in IM but take place among more than two individuals. Hence, weblogs, because of their unique way of being written, updated and linked to, constitute a unique communication genre. In addition to these attributes, Herring et al. (2005) claim that the proliferation of weblogs is the result of two main technological features. One is the capability of weblog software of not requiring users to know HTML programming to own and publish a weblog. The other is the capability of the software to allow publishing comments instantaneously. Furthermore, the popularity of weblogs can be explained by the fact that, unlike chat rooms and IM, web pages are indexed in search engines, which allows any internet user to access them directly. Blogs have been classified in different ways, for example, as diaries, journals, and commu- nity columns (Blood, 2000; 2004; Krishnamurthy, 2002; Miller et al., 2004; Hartelius, 2005; Herring et al., 2005; Nowson & Oberlander, 2007). While the terminologies of the typologies differ, all of them recognize the difference between individual- and community-based blogs. For our study, we focus on community blogs. The essence of a blog of this type is that its content is defined collectively (Krishnamurthy, 2002; Hartelius, 2005; Herring et al., 2005). The collective nature of community blogs raises interesting social dynamics such as the establish- ing of rules of membership, the negotiation of identities, and the struggles to distinguish what is worth publishing from what is not. Hence, the objective of this research is to make sense of those dynamics. Concretely, this paper aims at exploring the rules of membership, the constitutive practices, as well as the mechanisms for negotiating meanings and identities that configure a blog community. The identification of those social processes will provide us with an initial theoretical account of how these communities are structured and are able to remain cohesive. This will be of value not only for researchers who focus on the relationship between technology and society, but also for organizations interested in applying these types of technologies to bolster the generation and the sharing of knowledge. To achieve our research objective, we examine a specific blog – MetaFilter – that has been characterized as a community blog (Krishnamurthy, 2002; Herring et al., 2005). Accordingly, the empiric basis of this research is the posts available in the archives of the blog. As our main research question concerns the exploration of social processes, we decided to adopt an interpretivist research strategy (Taylor, 1971; Sanders, 1982; Walsham, 1993). For the orga- nization and analysis of the data, we use a theoretical lens that draws on the literature of communities of practice (CoPs) (Brown & Duguid, 1991; 1998); Lave, 1991; Lave & Wenger, © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Information Systems Journal 19, 55–81 Blog communities and MetaFilter 57 1991; Wenger, 1998; 2000; Wenger & Snyder, 2002; Wenger et al., 2002), which has also been widely acknowledged and applied by researchers in the information systems field (Wasko & Faraj, 2000; Markus, 2001; Mathiassen & Purao, 2002; Butler, 2003; Pan & Leidner, 2003; Gallivan et al., 2005). Thus, given the emphasis CoPs lay on knowledge sharing, identity and membership, we believe that this theoretical lens is appropriate for the purpose of interpreting the phenomenon of blogging. The results of the study are presented through analytical generalizations (Walsham, 1993; Lee & Baskerville, 2003), and their implications are discussed in the context of organizations that may be interested in adopting blog technology for enabling CoPs. THEORETICAL LENS In this section, we present our theoretical lens that, as indicated above, is derived from the CoPs literature (Brown & Duguid, 1991; 1998; Lave & Wenger, 1991; Lave, 1991; Wenger, 1998; 2000; Wenger & Snyder, 2002; Wenger et al., 2002). The term ‘community of practice’ is difficult to define; however, Wenger (1998) offers a clear formulation. Wenger (1998, p. 72) indicates that CoPs can be identified because of a distin- guished practice that is more salient than other attributes, such as activity, culture or structure. A CoP is not a network, team or group. It is different from a network because a CoP is not defined by established relationships. Likewise, it is defined neither by membership of a group nor by proximity. Instead, the source of coherence of a community is its practice. Wenger illustrates the concept through a community of claim processors in an insurance company, who, in addition to sharing a practice, are interested in improving their working conditions. While we do not claim that blog communities are CoPs – in the precise sense described by Wenger and his colleagues – we posit that they are communities defined and kept together by specific practices. CoPs as a theory has been subjected to critiques. In particular, researchers have argued that it ignores issues concerning trust (Roberts, 2006), power (Blackler & McDonald, 2000; Fox, 2000; Contu & Willmott, 2003; Walsham, 2005), predispositions (Mutch, 2003), size and spatial reach (Coe & Bunnell, 2003; Roberts, 2006). While these are valid concerns, we have discussed our findings with the awareness of these issues and maintain that CoPs is an appropriate theoretical lens for the purposes of our study for two reasons. First, the emerging nature of blog communities fits with the informal and non-canonical nature of CoPs (Wenger, 1998). Prior research has recognized the existence of blog communities among other types of blogs. Table 1 summarizes blog typologies in existing literature. Second, the body of knowledge of CoPs provides us with a detailed conceptual account of how communities learn, how the identities of their members are negotiated, and how new- comers become old-timers. As mentioned above, those are the phenomena that are the subject of our study. In this sense, we found that the literature of CoPs explains such phenomena as the result of the combination of four forces that are conceptualized as follows (Wenger, 1998): (a) identity, (b) knowledge sharing, (c) warrant mechanisms and (d) legitimate © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Information Systems Journal 19, 55–81 58 L Silva et al. Table 1. Blog typologies from existing literature Author/s Typology Description Blood (2000; Diaries, participatory media Blood traces the evolution of blogs from diary-like personal 2004) accounts to more interlinked, participatory media. Krishnamurthy Online diaries, support groups, Krishnamurthy classifies blogs based on their content in (2002) enhanced columns, and four quadrants along the axes of Personal vs.
Recommended publications
  • Weblogs and the Technology Lifecycle
    Weblogs and the Technology Lifecycle: Context, Geek-Chic and Personal Community by James M. Milne A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: S. Elizabeth Bird, Ph.D Kevin Yelvington, Ph.D Susan Greenbaum, Ph.D Mark Neumann, Ph.D Randy Miller, Ph.D Date of Approval: March 16, 2004 Keywords: blog, mass media, journalism, virtual community, mediascape © Copyright 2004, James M. Milne Dedication As we are all the sum of the supports, great and small, that we have received our whole lives, I am the result of the blessings showered upon me. This is dedicated to the family and friends who provided me with the inspiration, capabilities and the freedom to explore the mysteries that life has in it. Through their love, I am created as the man I am. I hope we are all the better for it. Acknowledgements This work would not have been possible without the assistance of several important groups of people. The faculty and staff of the University of South Florida have a passionate dedication to the development and application of anthropology in uses great and small. Their vision and energy has helped to reshape anthropology and will, no doubt, continue to do so. Without the engagement of the many people who work or play in the various disciplines of the mass media and journalism, there would have been nothing learned. So many people helped me, they cannot all be listed here, but thank you all.
    [Show full text]
  • Viral Spiral Also by David Bollier
    VIRAL SPIRAL ALSO BY DAVID BOLLIER Brand Name Bullies Silent Theft Aiming Higher Sophisticated Sabotage (with co-authors Thomas O. McGarity and Sidney Shapiro) The Great Hartford Circus Fire (with co-author Henry S. Cohn) Freedom from Harm (with co-author Joan Claybrook) VIRAL SPIRAL How the Commoners Built a Digital Republic of Their Own David Bollier To Norman Lear, dear friend and intrepid explorer of the frontiers of democratic practice © 2008 by David Bollier All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, in any form, without written permission from the publisher. The author has made an online version of the book available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license. It can be accessed at http://www.viralspiral.cc and http://www.onthecommons.org. Requests for permission to reproduce selections from this book should be mailed to: Permissions Department, The New Press, 38 Greene Street, New York,NY 10013. Published in the United States by The New Press, New York,2008 Distributed by W.W.Norton & Company,Inc., New York ISBN 978-1-59558-396-3 (hc.) CIP data available The New Press was established in 1990 as a not-for-profit alternative to the large, commercial publishing houses currently dominating the book publishing industry. The New Press operates in the public interest rather than for private gain, and is committed to publishing, in innovative ways, works of educational, cultural, and community value that are often deemed insufficiently profitable. www.thenewpress.com A Caravan book. For more information, visit www.caravanbooks.org. Composition by dix! This book was set in Bembo Printed in the United States of America 10987654321 CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii Introduction 1 Part I: Harbingers of the Sharing Economy 21 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    Produced Subjectivities and Productive Subjects: Locating the Potential of the Self-Reflective Blog Zorianna Zurba Submitted in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of Interdisciplinary MA in Popular Culture Brock University St. Catharines, Ontario © June 2008 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your File Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-57215-3 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-57215-3 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, prater, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantial de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Program Administration Volume 29, Number 3 (Spring 2006) © Council of Writing Program Administrators
    WPA: Writing Program Administration Volume 29, Number 3 (Spring 2006) © Council of Writing Program Administrators Writing Program Administration Journal of the Council of Writing Program Administrators Managing Editors Gregory Glau. Arizona State University Barry Maid . Arizona State University Duane Roen . Arizona State University Editorial Board Linda Adler-Kassner . .. .Eastern Michigan University Chris Anson . .North Carolina State University William P. Banks . East Carolina University Larry Beason . .University of South Alabama Linda S. Bergmann . Purdue University Shane Borrowman . .Gonzaga University Irene L. Clark . California State University, Northridge Gail S. Corso . Neumann College Beth Daniell . Kennesaw State University Michael J. Day . .. .Northern Illinois University Marvin Diogenes . Stanford University Sid Dobrin . University of Florida Donna Dunbar-Odom . .Texas A & M University-Commerce Russel Durst . University of Cincinnati Christine Farris . Indiana University Lynée Gaillet . .Georgia State University Jeffrey R. Galin . .Florida Atlantic University Paula Gillespie . Marquette University Maureen Goggin . .Arizona State University Risa P. Gorelick . .Monmouth University Jeff Grabill . Michigan State University Sherrie Gradin . .Ohio University Kristine Hansen . Brigham Young University Rich Haswell . .Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi Carol Haviland . California State University, San Bernardino Elizabeth Hodges . Virginia Commonwealth University WPA29_3.indd 1 4/13/06 12:23:13 AM WPA: Writing Program Administration Volume 29, Number 3 (Spring 2006) © Council of Writing Program Administrators Editorial Board (Continued) Deborah Holdstein . Northern Illinois University Mara Holt . Ohio University Bruce Horner . University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Alice Horning . Oakland University Rebecca Moore Howard . .Syracuse University Joseph Janangelo . .Loyola University George H. Jensen . University of Arkansas at Little Rock Catherine Latterell . .Pennsylvania State University, Altoona College Carrie Leverenz.
    [Show full text]
  • Nosostros, El Medo: Cómo Las Audiencias
    THINKING PAPER Nosotros, el medio Cómo las audiencias están modelando el futuro de la noticias y la información. Por Shayne Bowman y Chris Willis Editado por J.D. Lasica | Traducido por Guillermo Franco M. THINKING PAPER Nosotros,Nosotros, elel mediomedio Cómo las audiencias están modelando el futuro de la noticias y la información. Por Shayne Bowman y Chris Willis Editado por J.D. Lasica Traducido por Guillermo Franco M. We Media Encargado por The Media Center del American Press Institute. Publicado en julio del 2003 en PDF y HTML: www.hypergene.net/wemedia/ Traducido en Español en febrero del 2005 en PDF y HTML: www.hypergene.net/wemedia/espanol.php Ilustración de la carátula de Campbell Laird, www.campbelllaird.com Nosotros, el medio | Cómo las audiencias están modelando el futuro de la noticias y la información Copyright © 2003 Shayne Bowman, Chris Willis and The Media Center at The American Press Institute. Este trabajo es Licenciado por Creative Commons. Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.0 www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.es Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA. Publicado en julio del 2003 en PDF y HTML http://www.hypergene.net/wemedia/espanol.php http://www.mediacenter.org/mediacenter/research/wemedia/ Traducido por Guillermo Franco M. Editor, www.eltiempo.com Gerente de Contenido Nuevos Medios [email protected] Casa Editorial El Tiempo (CEET) Colombia Editado por J.D. Lasica, Senior Editor, Online Journalism Review, www.jdlasica.com Ilustración de la carátula de Campbell Laird, www.campbelllaird.com Diseño por Shayne Bowman, www.hypergene.net Sobre The Media Center The Media Center es una organización educativa y de investigación sin ánimo de lucro, comprometida con la construcción de una sociedad mejor informada en un mundo conectado.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociolinguistic Variation and Enregisterment in an Online Community of Practice: a Case Study of Metafilter.Com
    Sociolinguistic Variation and Enregisterment in an Online Community of Practice: A Case Study of MetaFilter.com Kimberly Ann Witten PhD University of York Language and Linguistic Science September 2014 I Abstract With the emergence of communities that are primarily based in computer-mediated communication (CMC) environments, we see the prevalence of internet-derived neologisms, i.e., netologisms. Often these netologisms are acronyms (e.g., ‘LOL’), blends (e.g., ‘weblog’), or other forms of abbreviation. These new forms may present challenges for English phonotactics, which must be spontaneously resolved by first-time speakers of the netologisms. If the forms contain orthographic characters or sequences that do not directly or consistently correlate to specific English phonemes or phoneme sequences, it is likely that these new forms display phonetic variation. Netologisms can also be used as linguistic resources in taking stances or asserting aspects of identity, especially where phonetic variation is possible. These stances may represent the identity of the group, or they may become associated with particular identities within the group. The process by which sounds, features and word forms become associated with particular identities is known as enregisterment (Agha, 2003, 2005; Squires, 2010). Enregisterment has traditionally been studied in sociolinguistics as a function of individuals interacting in face-to-face (FtF) environments (Johnstone, Andrus and Danielson, 2006; Beal, 2009). However, as more of our daily interactions are mediated by computers and technology, attention must be paid to how enregisterment may take place in primarily text-based social environments. This research presents the first large-scale mixed-methods study of enregisterment occurring in CMC.
    [Show full text]
  • We Mediamedia How Audiences Are Shaping the Future of News and Information
    THINKING PAPER WeWe MediaMedia How audiences are shaping the future of news and information By Shayne Bowman and Chris Willis THINKING PAPER WeWe MediaMedia How audiences are shaping the future of news and information By Shayne Bowman and Chris Willis Edited by J.D. Lasica Commissioned by The Media Center at The American Press Institute. Published July 2003 online in PDF and HTML: www.hypergene.net/wemedia/ Cover illustration by Campbell Laird, www.campbelllaird.com We Media | How audiences are shaping the future of news and information Copyright © 2003 Shayne Bowman, Chris Willis and The Media Center at The American Press Institute. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA. Published online in PDF and HTML formats, July 2003 http://www.hypergene.net/wemedia/ http://www.mediacenter.org/mediacenter/research/wemedia/ Edited by J.D. Lasica, Senior Editor, Online Journalism Review, http://www.jdlasica.com/ Cover illustration by Campbell Laird, www.campbelllaird.com Design by Shayne Bowman, www.hypergene.net About The Media Center The Media Center is a non-profit research and educational organization committed to building a better-informed society in a connected world. The Media Center conducts research, educational programs and symposia and facilitates strategic conversations and planning on issues shaping the future of news, information and media. The Media Center helps leaders, organizations and educators around the world understand and create multimedia futures.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact-Checking Journalism and the New Ecology of News
    Deciding What’s True: Fact-Checking Journalism and the New Ecology of News Lucas Graves Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2013 © 2012 Lucas Graves All rights reserved ABSTRACT Deciding What’s True: Fact-Checking Journalism and the New Ecology of News Lucas Graves This dissertation studies the new class of political fact-checkers, journalists who specialize in assessing the truth of public claims — and who, it is argued, constitute a professional reform movement reaching to the center of the elite US news media. In less than a decade this emergent genre of news has become a basic feature of political coverage. It figures prominently in national debates and commands the direct attention of elite political actors, who respond publicly to the fact-checkers and dedicate staff to dealing with them, especially during electoral campaigns. This study locates fact-checking in a wider practice of “annotative journalism,” with precursors in the muckraking tradition in American news, which has come into flower in an online media environment characterized by promiscuous borrowing and annotation. Participant observation and content analysis are used together to examine the day-to-day work of the news organizations leading the fact-checking movement. This approach documents the specific and forceful critique of conventional journalistic practice which the fact-checkers enact in their newswork routines and in their public and private discourse. Fact-checkers are a species of practical epistemologists, who seek to reform and thus to preserve the objectivity norm in American journalism, even as their daily work runs up against the limits of objective factual analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Nosotros, El Medio. Cómo Las Audiencias Están Modelando El Futuro
    THINKING PAPER Nosotros, el medio Cómo las audiencias están modelando el futuro de la noticias y la información. Por Shayne Bowman y Chris Willis Editado por J.D. Lasica | Traducido por Guillermo Franco M. THINKING PAPER Nosotros,Nosotros, elel mediomedio Cómo las audiencias están modelando el futuro de la noticias y la información. Por Shayne Bowman y Chris Willis Editado por J.D. Lasica Traducido por Guillermo Franco M. We Media Encargado por The Media Center del American Press Institute. Publicado en julio del 2003 en PDF y HTML: www.hypergene.net/wemedia/ Traducido en Español en febrero del 2005 en PDF y HTML: www.hypergene.net/wemedia/espanol.php Ilustración de la carátula de Campbell Laird, www.campbelllaird.com Nosotros, el medio | Cómo las audiencias están modelando el futuro de la noticias y la información Copyright © 2003 Shayne Bowman, Chris Willis and The Media Center at The American Press Institute. Este trabajo es Licenciado por Creative Commons. Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.0 www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.es Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA. Publicado en julio del 2003 en PDF y HTML http://www.hypergene.net/wemedia/espanol.php http://www.mediacenter.org/mediacenter/research/wemedia/ Traducido por Guillermo Franco M. Editor, www.eltiempo.com Gerente de Contenido Nuevos Medios [email protected] Casa Editorial El Tiempo (CEET) Colombia Editado por J.D. Lasica, Senior Editor, Online Journalism Review, www.jdlasica.com Ilustración de la carátula de Campbell Laird, www.campbelllaird.com Diseño por Shayne Bowman, www.hypergene.net Sobre The Media Center The Media Center es una organización educativa y de investigación sin ánimo de lucro, comprometida con la construcción de una sociedad mejor informada en un mundo conectado.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virtues of Moderation
    THE VIRTUES OF MODERATION James Grimmelmann! 17 YALE J.L. & TECH. 42 (2015) ABSTRACT TL;DR—On a Friday in 2005, the Los Angeles Times launched an experiment: a “wikitorial” on the Iraq War that any of the paper’s readers could edit. By Sunday, the experiment had ended in abject failure: vandals overran it with crude pro- fanity and graphic pornography. The wikitorial took its inspira- tion and its technology from Wikipedia, but missed something essential about how the “the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit” staves off abuse while maintaining its core commitment to open participation. The difference is moderation: the governance mechanisms that structure participation in a community to facilitate cooper- ation and prevent abuse. Town meetings have moderators, and so do online communities. A community’s moderators can pro- mote posts or hide them, honor posters or shame them, recruit users or ban them. Their decisions influence what is seen, what is valued, what is said. They create the conditions under which cooperation is possible. This Article provides a novel taxonomy of moderation in online communities. It breaks down the basic verbs of modera- tion—exclusion, pricing, organizing, and norm-setting—and shows how they help communities walk the tightrope between the chaos of too much freedom and the sterility of too much con- trol. Scholars studying the commons can learn from modera- tion, and so can policy-makers debating the regulation of online communities. ! Professor of Law, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of
    [Show full text]
  • The Trials and Tribulations of Building Or Remodeling a Law Library
    85697 AALL cover 4/29/04 3:16 PM Page 1 Volume AALL8 No. 7 May 2004 SpectrumAALL: Maximizing the Power of the Law Library Community Since 1906 The Trials and Tribulations In This Issue of Building or Remodeling a Law Library Blogs in Law Libraries Easing the Path for Newer Colleagues The CRIV Sheet 4th Annual Architecture Series www.aallnet.org 85697 AALL Spectrum.may 4/29/04 3:27 PM Page 1 Volume 8 No. 7 May 2004 AALL Spectrum letter from the editor New Architectural Beginnings for Law Libraries by Paul D. Healey, [email protected] So it’s May already. Spring is in full force and soon rounding into summer, the weather is good, and new things are everywhere. I’ve never really thought about it before, but it is especially appropriate for the May issue of Spectrum to be our annual architectural issue. In covering architectural achievements in law library facilities, we celebrate both the new and the renewal of the old. How fitting for a spring issue of the magazine. The annual architectural issue always brings an interesting variety of projects to show off, with plenty of valuable information about planning, building, remodeling, and moving a law library. As in the past, when planning the architectural issue we put out a call for authors on the law-lib online list discussion and got many more offers than we could possibly use. We are sincerely grateful to everyone who offered to write for this year’s issue and regret that we didn’t have room for more articles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virtues of Moderation
    Grimmelmann: The Virtues of Moderation THE VIRTUES OF MODERATION James Grimmelmann 17 YALE J.L. & TECH. 42 (2015) ABSTRACT TL;DR—On a Friday in 2005, the Los Angeles Times launched an experiment: a “wikitorial” on the Iraq War that any of the paper’s readers could edit. By Sunday, the experiment had ended in abject failure: vandals overran it with crude pro- fanity and graphic pornography. The wikitorial took its inspira- tion and its technology from Wikipedia, but missed something essential about how the “the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit” staves off abuse while maintaining its core commitment to open participation. The difference is moderation: the governance mechanisms that structure participation in a community to facilitate cooper- ation and prevent abuse. Town meetings have moderators, and so do online communities. A community’s moderators can pro- mote posts or hide them, honor posters or shame them, recruit users or ban them. Their decisions influence what is seen, what is valued, what is said. They create the conditions under which cooperation is possible. This Article provides a novel taxonomy of moderation in online communities. It breaks down the basic verbs of modera- tion—exclusion, pricing, organizing, and norm-setting—and shows how they help communities walk the tightrope between the chaos of too much freedom and the sterility of too much con- trol. Scholars studying the commons can learn from modera- tion, and so can policy-makers debating the regulation of online communities. Professor of Law, University of
    [Show full text]