Iil~Liji~~~~~3 6267 01222027 6 This Page Intentionally Blank

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Iil~Liji~~~~~3 6267 01222027 6 This Page Intentionally Blank BULLETIN 472 FEBRUARY, 1931 Bloom Period and Yield of Apples C. W. Ellenwood OHIO AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Wooster, Ohio 111111111111111111 llllllllllllllllllili~llij~flll~~~iil~liji~~~~~3 6267 01222027 6 This page intentionally blank. BLOOM PERIOD AND YIELD OF APPLES A 20-YEAR A VERAGE--1910-1929 C. W. ELLENWOOD The relation of date of bloom to frost injury and also to cross pollination is recognized as having an important bearing on the fruitfulness of apple orchards. The 20-year record of date of bloom and yield of the several varieties included in these records is presented in the hope that the data may be of some value to persons planting orchards. The data on blooming dates may be helpful in correcting trouble in bearing orchards due to lack of compatible varieties for purposes of pollina­ tion. Bearing habits and age at which profitable production is reached are also important factors in securing and maintaining profitable yields. The blooming dates as shown in the accompanying tables would probably be actually applicable to a rather narrow latitude. How­ ever, the relative variation in dates of bloom of the several varieties at Wooster would likely hold true in other sections; for instance, Oldenburg in southern Ohio is known to be an early blooming variety while Rome Beauty in all sections of the State is one of the later blooming varieties. Since soil and climate no doubt influence yields, the record of yields here presented might vary for orchards in certain other sections; for example, Delicious at Wooster, on a silt loam soil, has not come into bearing as early as it probably would on sandy soils. Baldwin, a standard mid-winter variety for northern Ohio, becomes a late fall variety in southern Ohio. The data supplied in this bulletin are therefore presented as representative of trees of aver­ age vigor growing in the Station orchard, approximately 55 miles inland from Lake Erie. One hundred and fifty-nine varieties are considered in this bulletin. A number of these varieties were not bearing at the beginning of the period, and these exceptions are noted in the tables. In addition to yield and date of bloom, information on the regularity of bearing and trend of production at various ages is presented. Crop failures, as used here, refer to trees yielding less than 1 bushel in any year. (1) 2 OHIO EXPERIMENT STATION: BULLETIN 472 TREATMENT OF ORCHARDS Most of the Station orchards considered in this bulletin were cultivated for the first half dozen years, then seeded down, and maintained under the grass mulch system. Grass mowed in the orchard was used for mulch. Straw and similar materials from outside the orchard were also added where necessary to provide a satisfactory mulch. For the last 7 years of the period, 1923-1929, a moderate amount of nitrogen fertilizer was used annually ; phos­ phorus was also applied occasionally, but not annually. The trees were given an annual light to moderate dormant pruning. An effort was made to train the trees to a modified leader type of tree. The spray treatment varied from year to year, and each year a number of different dust and spray formulae were used in various sections of the orchard. In recent years the tendency has been towards the use of dusts and dilute summer sprays rather than stronger solutions. On the whole, it may be said that the spray treatment was compatible with good commercial care. Thinning was quite regularly done but probably not to the extent of modifying total yields. Bees in sufficient numbers to provide proper pollination were kept in or nearby the orchard throughout the entire period. PERIOD COVERED BY RECORD The first comprehensive notes on date of bloom and yield in the Station apple orchards were taken in 1910. Each year since that time data have been compiled for all varieties represented in the Station orchards showing the date on which the variety opened its first bloom and the date on which the maximum number of blossoms were open (full bloom). The date of picking and the yield per tree were also recorded annually. The period here reported upon embraced the years 1910 to 1929, inclusive; thus, for those trees old enough in 1910 to bloom and bear fruit the record covers a 20-year period. Reports on date of bloom and yield of many of the varieties included in this report were made at the conclusion of the first 10 years (2) and again at the end of 15 years (3). It was thought that a 20-year record of date of bloom ought to provide an even more reliable average. The average dates of full bloom of 28 well known varieties for the first 10-year period, the 15-year period, and, finally, the full 20-year average are presented in Table 1. BLOOM PERIOD AND YIELD OF APPLES 3 TABLE 1.-Date of Full Bloom 10-, 15-, and 20-year period Variety 10-year period 1S-year period 20-year period 1910-19 1910-24 1910-29 Astrachan ........................................... May6 MayS May4 Baldwin .............................................. May6 MayS May6 Ben Davis ............................................ May9 May10 MayS Delicious •.............................................. MayS May9 MayS Fallawater ........................................... May9 MayS MayS Grimes ................................................ May7 May7 May6 Jonathan ............................................. May9 MayS MayS King •.................................................. May7 May7 May6 Mcintosh ............................................. May7 May7 May7 Mann ...•.............................................. May6 May6 MayS Northern Spy •......................................... Mayll May10 May10 Northwe stern (Greening) ........................... MaylO May 10 May9 Oldenburg ............................................ MayS MayS MayS Ralls•.................................................. May16 May 1S May14 Rambo................................................ MayS MayS May7 Red Canada •.......................................... MayS MayS MayS Rhode Island (Greening) .............................. MayS MayS May7 Rome Beauty ........................................ May 12 May12 Mayll Roxbury (Russet) .................................... May9 MayS MayS Stark ................................................. MayS May7 May6 Stayman ............................................. May9 MayS MayS Wealthy •.............................................. May9 May9 MayS White Pippin .•........................................ MayS May7 May7 Winter Banana....................................... MayS May6 MayS Winesap .............................................. MaylO MaylO MayS Yellow Bellflower ..................................... May7 May7 May7 Yellow Transparent ................................. May9 May9 MayS York Imperial •..••.••................................. MayS May9 May9 Average .......................................... MayS.4 MayS.2 May7.6 The average date of full bloom for the first 10 years was prac­ tically the same as it was for the 15-year period, but the average date of full bloom for the 28 varieties for the full 20-year period was almost a day earlier than it was for the first 10-year period. This is accounted for by the fact that there were more years when full bloom was reached before the average date during the latter half of the 20-year period than was true for the first 10-year period. Taking into consideration 10 commercial varieties, Table 2, it will be noted that in only one year (1910) of the first 10 years did these 10 varieties show an average date of full bloom as early as May 1. There were four years, 1921, 1922, 1925, and 1929, in the second 10-year period (1920-1929) when the same varieties had an average date of full bloom of May 1 or earlier. RELATION OF DATE OF BLOOM TO FROST INJURY During the 20-year period the Station orchards were exception­ ally free from commercial frost injury. This was at least partly due to their being located on land well elevated above the surround­ ing country. Frost destroyed a considerable number of fruit buds, but not to the extent of seriously affecting total yields in 1910, 1913, 1925, and 1929. The most serious loss from this source prob- "'" TABLE 2.-Date of Full Bloom of 10 Standard Varieties 0 1!:: 20-year period, 1910-1929 >-1 I 0 Mean Minimum No. days temper- t.".J Yellow Averages temper- Mean temperature ature dropped Olden- Rome ature temper- following full below freezing Trans- burg Wealthy Mcintosh Grimes Jonathan DeliciouS: Baldwin Stayman 10 ~ parent Beauty varieties for March ature bloom and following full t.".J and for May prior to bloom and prior April June 1 to June 1 ~ -------------------------------------------------- is: t.".J 1910 .. Apr. 22 Apr. 13 Apr. 29 Apr. 20 Apr. 17 Apr, 22 Apr. 25 Apr. 24 Apr. 26 May 1 Apr. 23 4S. 7 54.S 25 5 1911 .. May12 Mayll May12 Mayll Mayll May 12 May14 May12 May13 May 15 May 12 40.7 63.6 33 0 z 1912 .. MayS May6 May7 MayS May7 May7 MayS May10 MayS MayS MayS 40.2 61.2 36 0 >-'3 1913 .. May5 May4 May6 May4 May4 MayS MayS MayS May6 May7 MayS 43.7 S7.9 2S 3 r:n. 1914 .. May 1S Mayll May 16 May10 May12 May 14 May12 May 12 May12 May 1S May13 41.3 S9.S 30 1 191S .. May10 May4 May10 May9 MayS May 10 May9 MayS MaylO May 12 May9 42.2 5S.6 2S 2 1916 .. May17 Mayll May16 May 12 May12 Ma.v 13 May 12 May13 May1S May 16 May14 39.4 60.2 34 0 1917 .. May22 May19 May20 May20 May21 May20 May21 May21 May21 May24 May21 42.1 S2.6 34 0 ~ 191S .. May6 MayS May6 May6 May6 Ma.v7 May6 May7 May7 May9 May7 45.9 6S.O 37 0 0 1919 .. MayS May6 May6 May6 MayS May? May6 May6 May6 MayS May6 44.2 SS.1 3S 0 z 1920 .. May1S May 12 May19 May 17 May 17 May20 May19 May19 May19 May21 May1S 43.0 S6.4 42 0 1921.. Apr. 21 .......... Apr. 22 Apr. 19 Apr. 21 Apr. 21 Apr. 21 Apr. 21 Apr. 20 Apr. 2S Apr. 22 Sl.6 60.6 31 1 1:0 1922 .. Apr. 30 Apr. 26 May1 Apr. 30 May2 May2 May2 May2 May2 May6 May1 46.2 62.2 33 0 q 1923 .. May 14 MayS May14 May 14 May 13 May1S May 1S May 1S May15 May 1S Ma.v14 42.1 S6.9 35 0 1924 .
Recommended publications
  • Apples Catalogue 2019
    ADAMS PEARMAIN Herefordshire, England 1862 Oct 15 Nov Mar 14 Adams Pearmain is a an old-fashioned late dessert apple, one of the most popular varieties in Victorian England. It has an attractive 'pearmain' shape. This is a fairly dry apple - which is perhaps not regarded as a desirable attribute today. In spite of this it is actually a very enjoyable apple, with a rich aromatic flavour which in apple terms is usually described as Although it had 'shelf appeal' for the Victorian housewife, its autumnal colouring is probably too subdued to compete with the bright young things of the modern supermarket shelves. Perhaps this is part of its appeal; it recalls a bygone era where subtlety of flavour was appreciated - a lovely apple to savour in front of an open fire on a cold winter's day. Tree hardy. Does will in all soils, even clay. AERLIE RED FLESH (Hidden Rose, Mountain Rose) California 1930’s 19 20 20 Cook Oct 20 15 An amazing red fleshed apple, discovered in Aerlie, Oregon, which may be the best of all red fleshed varieties and indeed would be an outstandingly delicious apple no matter what color the flesh is. A choice seedling, Aerlie Red Flesh has a beautiful yellow skin with pale whitish dots, but it is inside that it excels. Deep rose red flesh, juicy, crisp, hard, sugary and richly flavored, ripening late (October) and keeping throughout the winter. The late Conrad Gemmer, an astute observer of apples with 500 varieties in his collection, rated Hidden Rose an outstanding variety of top quality.
    [Show full text]
  • RGC8-S7O03 H. Muranty.Pdf
    Analysis of genetic control of fruit size in apple using both multiple, pedigree-related and single full- sib families Hélène MURANTY, François LAURENS, Marco C.A.M. BINK , Eric van de WEG Hélène MURANTY RGC8 21-23 June 2016 Introduction • Fruit size = appearance + yield component • QTL for marker-assisted selection – large population precise location – large diversity consistency across genetic backgrounds Pedigree-based analysis • Bink et al 2002, 2008, 2014 • Rosyara et al 2013 • Fresnedo-Ramírez et al 2015, 2016 • Roach et al 2016 • Allard et al 2016 2 Hélène MURANTY RGC8 21-23 June2 2016 Previous studies reference cross pop fruit trait linkage group size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Liebhard et al Discovery × Fiesta 251 weight (2003) X X X X X X X X Kenis et al (2008) Telamon × Braeburn 199 / weight, X X X X X X X 165 diameter, height Royal Gala × 572 Devoghalaere et al Braeburn weight X X X X X X (2012) Starkrimson × 123 Granny Smith Chang et al (2014) Jonathan × Golden 144 / weight, X X X X Delicious 140 diameter, length Fuji × Delearly 86 Fuji × Cripps Pink 73 size, weight, Costa (2015) Golden Delicious × 185 X X X X X X X Scarlet diameter, height Golden Delicious × 75 Braeburn 3 Hélène MURANTY RGC8 21-23 June3 2016 Material Z185 BVIII_34.16 GoldenDel X-4355 X-6820 PRI612-1 F_X-4355 Generos 12_E AntonovkaOB Chantecler Idared Florina X-6681 Delicious PRI672-3 X-6683 26 related F_B8_34.16 X-3177 Baujade PRI14-126 ReiDuMans I_M Clochard PRI14-152 X-6799 TN_R10A8 families X-3259 X-6398 HiDRAS Jonathan Winesap Crandall
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Breeding: a Study of Jonathan Crosses
    J une, 1928 Research Bulletin No. 116 A.pple Breeding: A Study of Jonathan Crosses By H. L . LANTZ AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION IOWA STATE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND MECHANIC ARTS C. F. CURTISS, Director POMOLOGY SECTION AMES, IOWA SUMMARY Two hundred seventy-three Jonathan seedlings produced by 11 crosses form the basis of the records in this bulletin. These studies show clearly that the progenies produced by the different crosses of Jonathan differ or vary in many important char­ acteristics. These variations are attributed to differences in the genetic constitution of the Eeveral varieties which were used in combination with Jonathan, and indicate the relative value of these varieties as parents when crossed with Jonathan. The range of variation in the seedlings of these progenies is gen­ erally quite wide both as to tree and fruit. Differences in the horti­ cultural characteristics such as occur in size, form, color, flavor, quality and season of the seedling fruits suggest that multiple fac­ tors are concerned, which produce the many variations observed. Jonathan appears to carry as partially dominant factors for medi­ um and below medium size of fruit, but it evidently carries factors also for large and for small size. Factors for roundish, conic, ob­ late and oblong fruit forms are present. Jonathan appears to be homozygous for red skin color but is heterozygous for pattern and carries factors for both fine and coarse grained flesh, for juiciness, for both acid and sweet flavor and for very good as well as for poor quality. The factors which control the season of the fruit are evi­ dently complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Varieties in Maine Frederick Charles Bradford
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 6-1911 Apple Varieties in Maine Frederick Charles Bradford Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Agriculture Commons Recommended Citation Bradford, Frederick Charles, "Apple Varieties in Maine" (1911). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2384. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2384 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Maine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN AGRICULTURE by FREDERICK CHARLES BRADFORD, B. S . Orono, Maine. June, 1911. 8 2 8 5 INTRODUCTION The following pages represent an effort to trace the causes of the changing procession of varieties of apples grown in Maine. To this end the history of fruit growing in Maine has been carefully studied, largely through the Agricultural Reports from 1850 to 1909 and the columns of the Maine Farmer fran 1838 to 1875. The inquiry has been confined as rigidly as possible to this state, out­ side sources being referred to only for sake of compari­ son. Rather incidentally, soil influences, modifications due to climate, etc., have been considered. Naturally* since the inquiry was limited to printed record, nothing new has been discovered in this study. Perhaps a somewhat new point of view has been achieved. And, since early Maine pomological literature has been rather neglected by our leading writers, some few forgot­ ten facts have been exhumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Variety Description Origin Approximate Ripening Uses
    Approximate Variety Description Origin Ripening Uses Yellow Transparent Tart, crisp Imported from Russia by USDA in 1870s Early July All-purpose Lodi Tart, somewhat firm New York, Early 1900s. Montgomery x Transparent. Early July Baking, sauce Pristine Sweet-tart PRI (Purdue Rutgers Illinois) release, 1994. Mid-late July All-purpose Dandee Red Sweet-tart, semi-tender New Ohio variety. An improved PaulaRed type. Early August Eating, cooking Redfree Mildly tart and crunchy PRI release, 1981. Early-mid August Eating Sansa Sweet, crunchy, juicy Japan, 1988. Akane x Gala. Mid August Eating Ginger Gold G. Delicious type, tangier G Delicious seedling found in Virginia, late 1960s. Mid August All-purpose Zestar! Sweet-tart, crunchy, juicy U Minn, 1999. State Fair x MN 1691. Mid August Eating, cooking St Edmund's Pippin Juicy, crisp, rich flavor From Bury St Edmunds, 1870. Mid August Eating, cider Chenango Strawberry Mildly tart, berry flavors 1850s, Chenango County, NY Mid August Eating, cooking Summer Rambo Juicy, tart, aromatic 16th century, Rambure, France. Mid-late August Eating, sauce Honeycrisp Sweet, very crunchy, juicy U Minn, 1991. Unknown parentage. Late Aug.-early Sept. Eating Burgundy Tart, crisp 1974, from NY state Late Aug.-early Sept. All-purpose Blondee Sweet, crunchy, juicy New Ohio apple. Related to Gala. Late Aug.-early Sept. Eating Gala Sweet, crisp New Zealand, 1934. Golden Delicious x Cox Orange. Late Aug.-early Sept. Eating Swiss Gourmet Sweet-tart, juicy Switzerland. Golden x Idared. Late Aug.-early Sept. All-purpose Golden Supreme Sweet, Golden Delcious type Idaho, 1960. Golden Delicious seedling Early September Eating, cooking Pink Pearl Sweet-tart, bright pink flesh California, 1944, developed from Surprise Early September All-purpose Autumn Crisp Juicy, slow to brown Golden Delicious x Monroe.
    [Show full text]
  • Germplasm Sets and Standardized Phenotyping Protocols for Fruit Quality Traits in Rosbreed
    Germplasm Sets and Standardized Phenotyping Protocols for Fruit Quality Traits in RosBREED Jim Luby, Breeding Team Leader Outline of Presentation RosBREED Demonstration Breeding Programs Standardized Phenotyping Protocols Reference Germplasm Sets SNP Detection Panels Crop Reference Set Breeding Pedigree Set RosBREED Demonstration Breeding Programs Clemson U WSU Texas A&M UC Davis U Minn U Arkansas Rosaceae Cornell U WSU MSU MSU Phenotyping Affiliates USDA-ARS Driscolls Corvallis Univ of Florida UNH Standardized Phenotyping Protocols Traits and Standardized Phenotyping Protocols • Identify critical fruit quality traits and other important traits • Develop standardized phenotyping protocols to enable data pooling across locations/institutions • Protocols available at www.RosBREED.org Apple Standardized Phenotyping Firmness, Crispness – Instrumental, Sensory Sweetness, Acidity – Intstrumental, Sensory Color, Appearance, Juiciness, Aroma – Sensory At harvest Cracking, Russet, Sunburn Storage 10w+7d Storage 20w+7d Maturity Fruit size 5 fruit (reps) per evaluation Postharvest disorders Harvest date, Crop, Dropping RosBREED Apple Phenotyping Locations Wenatchee, WA St Paul, MN Geneva, NY • One location for all evaluations would reduce variation among instruments and evaluators • Local evaluations more sustainable and relevant for future efforts at each institution • Conduct standardized phenotyping of Germplasm Sets at respective sites over multiple (2-3) seasons • Collate data in PBA format, conduct quality control, archive Reference
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Wild Species Potential to Increase Genetic Diversity Useful for Apple Breeding
    UDC 575.630 DOI: 10.2298/GENSR1503993D Original scientific paper INVESTIGATION OF WILD SPECIES POTENTIAL TO INCREASE GENETIC DIVERSITY USEFUL FOR APPLE BREEDING Catalina DAN1, Adriana F. SESTRAS1,*, Calin BOZDOG1,2, Radu E. SESTRAS1 1University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2Fruit Research Station, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Dan C., A. F. Sestras, C. Bozdog, R.E. Sestras (2015): Investigation of wild species potential to increase genetic diversity useful for apple breeding - Genetika, Vol 47, No. 3, 993-1011. The potential of testing new apple cultivars and the possibility to induce valuable traits is directly dependent on the availability of sufficient genetic diversity, while apple breeding has narrowed the genetic ground of commercial cultivars. Wild species were studied in regard to their influence upon progenies and their capacity to enlarge apple genetic diversity. The interspecific seedlings were framed in five biparental mating (paired crosses), in which Malus species were crossed with different cultivars, obtaining half-sib families. The number of F1 progenies per combination varied from 31 (Cluj 218/2 × M. floribunda) up to 142 (Reinette Baumann × M. floribunda), with a total of 1650 hybrids F1. The influences upon vigour and juvenile period and possible correlation among fruit size and taste were analyzed. Juvenile period varied from 6.00 (M. zumi × Jonathan) to 9.31 years (Cluj 218/2 × M. floribunda). Data based on correlation coefficient illustrated that the fructification year was not influenced by the vigour of trees. The highest value of correlation for fruit’s size and taste was obtained among M. coronaria hybrids. This result might suggest that once the fruit are larger, there is a high chance the taste is also more appreciative and fruit quality for mouth feels increase.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliable Fruit Tree Varieties for Santa Cruz County
    for the Gardener Reliable Fruit Tree Varieties for Santa Cruz County lanting a fruit tree is, or at least should be, a considered act involving a well thought-out plan. In a sense, you “design” a tree, or by extension, an orchard—and as tempting as it may be to grab a shovel and start digging, the Plast thing you do is plant the tree. There are many elements to the plan for successful deciduous fruit tree growing. They include, but are not limited to – • Site selection • Sanitation, particularly on the orchard floor • Soil—assessment and improvement • Weed management • Scale and diversity of the planting • Pruning/training systems • What genera and species (apple, pear, plum, • Thinning peach, etc.) and what varieties grow well in an area • Pest and disease control • Pollination • Sourcing quality trees • Irrigation • The planting hole and process • A fertility plan and associated fertilizers • Harvest and post-harvest All of the above factors comprise the jigsaw puzzle or the Rubik’s Cube of fruit growing. In essence, you must align all the colored cubes to induce smiles on the faces of both growers and consumers. This article focuses on the selection of genera, species, and varieties that do well in Santa Cruz County, and discusses chill hour requirements as one major criterion for successful fruit tree growing. THE RELIABLE—AND NOT SO RELIABLE What Grows Well Here By “what grows well,” I mean what produces a reliable annual crop and is relatively disease and pest free. In Santa Cruz County, that includes— • Apples • Pluots • Pears
    [Show full text]
  • Cedar-Apple Rust
    DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE RESEARCH & EXTENSION Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Arkansas System FSA7538 Cedar-Apple Rust Stephen Vann Introduction Assistant Professor ­ One of the most spectacular Extension Urban Plant Pathologist diseases to appear in spring is cedar- apple rust. This disease is caused by the fungus Gymnosporangium juniperi-virginianae and requires both cedar and apple trees to survive each year. It is mainly a problem in the eastern portion of North America and is most important on apple or crab ­ Figure 2. Cedar-apple rust on crabapple apple (Malus sp), but can also affect foliage. quince and hawthorn. yellow-orange color (Figures 1 and 2). Symptoms On the upper leaf surface of these spots, the fungus produces specialized The chief damage by this disease fruiting bodies called spermagonia. On occurs on apple trees, causing early the lower leaf surface (and sometimes leaf drop and poor quality fruit. This on fruit), raised hair-like fruiting bod­ can be a significant problem to com­ ies called aecia (Figure 3) appear as mercial apple growers but also harms microscopic cup-shaped structures. the appearance of ornamental crab ­ Wet, rainy weather conditions favor apples in the home landscape. On severe infection of the apple. The apple, symptoms first appear as fungus forms large galls on cedar trees small green-yellow leaf or fruit spots in the spring (see next section), but that gradually enlarge to become a these structures do not greatly harm Arkansas Is Our Campus Visit our web site at: Figure 1. Cedar-apple rust (leaf spot) on Figure 3. Aecia of cedar-apple rust on https://www.uaex.uada.edu apple (courtesy J.
    [Show full text]
  • Vyhláška Č. 331/2017 Sb
    zakonyprolidi_cs_2017_331_v20180124 https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/print/cs/2017-331/zneni-20180124.htm Vyhláška č. 331/2017 Sb. Vyhláška o stanovení dalších odrůdovocných druhů s úředně uznaným popisem, které se považují za zapsané do Státní odrůdové knihy https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2017-331 Částka 113/2017 Platnost od 11.10.2017 Účinnost od 01.11.2017 Aktuální znění 24.01.2018 331 VYHLÁŠKA ze dne 2. října 2017 o stanovení dalších odrůd ovocných druhů s úředně uznaným popisem, které se považují za zapsané do Státní odrůdové knihy Ministerstvo zemědělství stanoví podle § 35c odst. 5 zákona č. 219/2003 Sb., o uvádění do oběhu osiva a sadby pěstovaných rostlin a o změně některých zákonů (zákon o oběhu osiva a sadby), ve znění zákona č. 295/2017 Sb.: § 1 Další odrůdy ovocných druhů s úředně uznaným popisem, které se považují za zapsané do Státní odrůdové knihy, jsou uvedeny v příloze k této vyhlášce. § 2 Účinnost Tato vyhláška nabývá účinnosti dnem 1. listopadu 2017. Ministr: Ing. Jurečka v. r. Příloha k vyhlášce č. 331/2017 Sb. Seznam dalších odrůd ovocných druhů s úředně uznaným popisem, které se považují za zapsané do Státní odrůdové knihy Druh Odrůda Líska (Corylus avellana L.) Lombardská červená Římský Kdouloň (Cydonia oblonga Milí.) Asenica Bereczkého Hruškovitá Izobilnaja Kocurova Leskovačka Muškatnaja Selena Jahodník (Fragaria L.) Evita Frikonsa Kama 1 z 11 07.03.2018, 13:22 zakonyprolidi_cs_2017_331_v20180124 https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/print/cs/2017-331/zneni-20180124.htm Lesana Maranell Mount Everest Olivie Polka Roxana Vanda
    [Show full text]
  • Apples Abound
    APPLES ABOUND: FARMERS, ORCHARDS, AND THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPES OF AGRARIAN REFORM, 1820-1860 A Dissertation Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy John Henris May, 2009 APPLES ABOUND: FARMERS, ORCHARDS, AND THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPES OF AGRARIAN REFORM, 1820-1860 John Henris Dissertation Approved: Accepted: ____________________________ ____________________________ Advisor Department Chair Dr. Kevin Kern Dr. Michael M. Sheng ____________________________ ____________________________ Committee Member Dean of the College Dr. Lesley J. Gordon Dr. Chand Midha ____________________________ ____________________________ Committee Member Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Kim M. Gruenwald Dr. George R. Newkome ____________________________ ____________________________ Committee Member Date Dr. Elizabeth Mancke ____________________________ Committee Member Dr. Randy Mitchell ____________________________ Committee Member Dr. Gregory Wilson ii ABSTRACT This dissertation argues that apple cultivation was invariably intertwined with, and shaped by, the seemingly discordant threads of scientific agricultural specialization, emigration, urbanization, sectionalism, moral reform, and regional identity in New England and Ohio prior to the American Civil War. As the temperance cause gained momentum during the 1820s many farmers abandoned their cider trees and transitioned to the cultivation of grafted winter apples in New England. In turn agricultural writers used
    [Show full text]
  • Treeid Variety Run 2 DNA Milb005 American Summer Pearmain
    TreeID Variety Run 2 DNA Run 1 DNA DNA Sa… Sourc… Field Notes milb005 American Summer Pearmain/ "Sara's Polka American Summer Pearmain we2g016 AmericanDot" Summer Pearmain/ "Sara's Polka American Summer Pearmain we2f017 AmericanDot" Summer Pearmain/ "Sara's Polka American Summer Pearmain we2f018 AmericanDot" Summer Pearmain/ "Sara's Polka American Summer Pearmain eckh001 BaldwinDot" Baldwin-SSE6 eckh008 Baldwin Baldwin-SSE6 2lwt007 Baldwin Baldwin-SSE6 2lwt011 Baldwin Baldwin-SSE6 schd019 Ben Davis Ben Davis mild006 Ben Davis Ben Davis wayb004 Ben Davis Ben Davis andt019 Ben Davis Ben Davis ostt014 Ben Davis Ben Davis watt008 Ben Davis Ben Davis wida036 Ben Davis Ben Davis eckg002 Ben Davis Ben Davis frea009 Ben Davis Ben Davis frei009 Ben Davis Ben Davis frem009 Ben Davis Ben Davis fres009 Ben Davis Ben Davis wedg004 Ben Davis Ben Davis frai006 Ben Davis Ben Davis frag004 Ben Davis Ben Davis frai004 Ben Davis Ben Davis fram006 Ben Davis Ben Davis spor004 Ben Davis Ben Davis coue002 Ben Davis Ben Davis couf001 Ben Davis Ben Davis coug008 Ben Davis Ben Davis, error on DNA sample list, listed as we2a023 Ben Davis Bencoug006 Davis cria001 Ben Davis Ben Davis cria008 Ben Davis Ben Davis we2v002 Ben Davis Ben Davis we2z007 Ben Davis Ben Davis rilcolo Ben Davis Ben Davis koct004 Ben Davis Ben Davis koct005 Ben Davis Ben Davis mush002 Ben Davis Ben Davis sc3b005-gan Ben Davis Ben Davis sche019 Ben Davis, poss Black Ben Ben Davis sche020 Ben Davis, poss Gano Ben Davis schi020 Ben Davis, poss Gano Ben Davis ca2e001 Bietigheimer Bietigheimer/Sweet
    [Show full text]