Green Paper the Lancaster Sound Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Green Paper the Lancaster Sound Region Green Paper The Lancaster Sound Region: 1980-2000 Issues and Options on the Use and Management of the Region Lancaster Sound Regional Study H.J. Dirschl Project Manager January 1982 =Published under the authority of the Hon. John C. Munro, P.C., M.P., Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Ottawa, 1981. 05-8297-020-EE-A1 Catalogue No. R72-164/ 1982E ISBN 0-662-11869 Cette publication peut aussi etre obtenue en francais. Preface In the quest for a "best plan" for Lancaster Sound criticisms. This feedback is discussed in detail in a and its abundant resources, this public discussion recently puolished report by the workshop chairman. paper seeks to stimulate a continued. wide-ranging, Professor Peter Jacobs, entitled People. Resources examination of the issues involved in the future use and the Environment: Perspectives on the Use and and management of this unique area of the Canadian Management of the Lancaster Sound Region. All the Arctic. input received during the public review phase has been taken into consideration in the preparation of the The green paper is the result of more than two years final green paper. of work by the Northern Affairs Program of the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern From the beginning of the study, it was expected that Development, in co-operation with the government of to arrive at an overall consensus of the optimum fu­ the Northwest Territories and the federal departments ture use and management of the Lancaster Sound of Energy, Mines and Resources, Environment. region would require intensive public discussion fol­ Fisheries and Oceans. and Transport. The working lowing the release of the green paper. Greatly diver­ group set up to conduct the study first assembled a gent views held by different sectors of the public will data base in the form of a data atlas and a series of have to be assessed and balanced during this final technical background papers. A synthesis of this infor­ stage. mation. together with an analysis of the issues. was presented to the public as a draft green paper, re­ To foster this discussion, the green paper presents a leased by the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern series of specific resource use options for Lancaster Development, the Honourable John C. Munro. at Sound; it also outlines alternative approaches to a Frobisher Bay in February 1981. regional planning mechanism. The reaction of the public to these options will have a significant influence In the months that followed, an extensive public re­ on the decisions that the Minister of Indian Affairs and view of the issues involved open meetings in the four Northern Development and his Cabinet colleagues will Lancaster Sound communities and public workshops make on the region. in Resolute and Ottawa. These were well attended, and representatives of all interests in the Lancaster There is clearly a need to establish an ongoing Sound area - Inuit, government, industry. conser­ process of regional planning for Lancaster Sound that vationists. public interest groups and concerned indi­ will include meaningful participation by the Inuit resi­ viduals - provided valuable and necessary contri­ dents. The recent initiation by the department of a pro­ butions in the form of viewpoints. suggestions and gram for comprehensive land use planning north of 3 60° is expected to lead to the implementation of such a process in the Lancaster Sound region, and other areas of the North where decisions on resource devel­ opment activities are urgent. As the details of this pro­ gram have not yet been put into place, some interim steps are proposed to facilitate the early introduction of effective regional planning. Public awareness of the complex issues faced in Lancaster Sound and throughout the Arctic has been heightened by the Lancaster Sound Regional Study. Southern Canadians now are more familiar with the concerns of the region's Inuit residents, while the Inuit have had an opportunity to become more knowledge­ able of the broader national and international issues bearing on many decisions about the future of the re­ gion. The increased familiarity with each others' views and perspectives that this study has given to the dif­ ferent sectors of the concerned public has led to a greater willingness to seek solutions jointly. This greatly improved climate for planning and decision­ making should be considered a significant step in the evolution of a "best plan" for the future of this mag­ nificent arctic region. Herman J. Dirschl, Allan H. Jones, Project Manager, A/Chairman, Lancaster Sound Steering Committee Regional Study 4 Summary Lancaster Sound, a magnificent part of Canada's high cialists from the participating departments and several Arctic, poses a great challenge to Canadians in plan­ outside consultants, adopted a regional planning ap­ ning for the future uses of the country's natural re­ proach to identify and analyze the significant issues sources. Ecologically, the Sound is possibly the bearing on the future uses of the region, and to set richest, most productive area in the entire Arctic. It is the stage for comprehensive planning. A detailed data also the entrance to the Northwest Passage, and is base, summarizing the present state of knowledqe of thus a potential transit route for increased shipping if Lancaster Sound as it relates to regional planning, industrial development of any kind proceeds in the was assembled. It consisted of a data atlas dealing Arctic. Since the Sound also has a hydrocarbon po­ with the region's physical and biological characteris­ tential of its own, important decisions have to be tics and renewable resource use patterns and illus­ made about the safety of possible oil and gas explora­ trating present and potential industrial and commercial tion and development there, as Canada pursues its activities. Five background reports, containing 12 indi­ national objective of energy self-sufficiency. Weighing vidual papers that provided more detailed information heavily in the balance of considerations for future uses on these subjects, completed the data base. A synthe­ of Lancaster Sound are the interests of the Inuit who sis of this information, together with an analysis of the continue to depend on the area's abundant biological issues, was produced by the working group in the resources. form of a draft green paper. All material was made available in English, French and lnuktitut. An Environmental Assessment and Review Process (EARP) panel, deliberating on a proposal to drill in the The purpose of the draft green paper was to stlrnolate Sound, concluded that a meaningful assessment public participation in the identification of issues and could not be made in isolation from the broader issues the subsequent formulation of options for the planning affecting the region. The Minister of Indian Affairs and and use of the Lancaster Sound region. An answer Northern Development accepted the recommendation was sought to the question: "What do you believe that a comprehensive review of these issues be un­ would be our best plan for Lancaster Sound?" dertaken, and the Lancaster Sound Regional Study was established by the department in conjunction with Release of the draft green paper in February 1981 by the government of the Northwest Territories and the the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern federal departments of Energy, Mines and Resources, Development was followed by an extensive public re­ Environment, Fisheries and Oceans, and Transport. view phase with meetings and workshops held in the North and the South. The viewpoints expressed by the An interdisciplinary working group, consisting of spe- public during this phase clarified many issues and re- 5 suited in a number of recommendations that have trial development. The options are: been considered in the preparation of this report. The No new development of any kind, including conser­ final green paper is intended to foster continued dis­ Relative priorities for the delineation and development vation and renewable resource development, or ex­ cussion, focussing on the resource use options pre­ of Canada's offshore hydrocarbon potential have not pansion of existing activities would be permitted for sented and the regional planning process. yet been established by government, but spokesmen the forseeable future, or until changing social, eco­ stress that hydrocarbon exploration at any cost has nomic or conservation requirements necessitated re­ Concerns and Issues never been its policy. evaluation of this option. One of the major concerns identified by the Lancaster Sound Regional Study pertains to the environment Much of the public attention focusses on the issues Protection of the environment and biological resources and its continued use by the Inuit. The Sound's bio­ underlying the development and political evolution of would be assured before further resource use projects logical productivity is of global significance and the the North. In view of the ongoing land claim negotia­ are permitted. A comprehensive strategy matching area will require comprehensive protection measures. tions, the pace and timing of development is a major conservation requirements with appropriate levels of The Inuit, fearing the boom-and-bust effects of non­ issue for Inuit, government and industry alike. protection would be designed and implemented. renewable resource exploitation, would prefer a stable Meaningful participation by local people in planning economy based on renewable resource use. Inuit are and decision-making and the potentially unequal distri­ Development of the renewable resource base would very concerned about the environmental risks of year­ bution of social costs and benefits from development support the long-term economic requirements of the round shipping of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and oil, are major issues affecting the continued ability of the Inuit in a manner more compatible with their traditional and the possible effects of such shipping on the ani­ Inuit to choose their own lifestyle. pursuits and with the protection of the environment.
Recommended publications
  • Abstracts Annual Scientific Meeting ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑕᒫᕐᓯᐅᑎᒥᒃ ᑲᑎᒪᓂᕐᒃ
    Abstracts Annual Scientific Meeting ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑕᒫᕐᓯᐅᑎᒥᒃ ᑲᑎᒪᓂᕐᒃ 2016 Réunion scientifique annuelle 5-9/12/2016, Winnipeg, MB ASM2016 Conference Program Oral Presentation and Poster Abstracts ABSTRACTS FROBISHER BAY: A NATURAL LABORATORY complete habitat characterization. This recent sampling FOR THE STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL effort recorded heterogeneous substrates composed of CHANGE IN CANADIAN ARCTIC MARINE various proportions of boulder, cobbles, gravel, sand HABITATS. and mud forming a thin veneer over bedrock at water depths less than 200 metres. Grab samples confirm Aitken, Alec (1), B. Misiuk (2), E. Herder (2), E. the relative abundance of mollusks, ophiuroids and Edinger (2), R. Deering (2), T. Bell (2), D. Mate(3), C. tubiculous polychaetes as constituents of the infauna Campbell (4), L. Ham (5) and V.. Barrie (6) in the inner bay. Drop video images captured a diverse (1) University of Saskatchewan (Saskatoon, Canada); epifauna not previously described from the FRBC (2) Department of Geography, Memorial University of research. A variety of bryozoans, crinoid echinoderms, Newfoundland (St. John’s, NL, Canada); sponges and tunicates recorded in the images remain (3) Polar Knowledge Canada (Ottawa, Ontario, to be identified. Habitat characterization will allow us Canada); to quantify ecological change in benthic invertebrate (4) Marine Resources Geoscience, Geological Survey of species composition within the habitat types represented Canada (Dartmouth, NS, Canada); at selected sampling stations through time. Such long- (5) Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office, Natural term studies are crucial for distinguishing directional Resources Canada (Iqaluit, NU, Canada); change in ecosystems. Marine Geological Hazards (6) Marine Geoscience, Geological Survey of Canada and Seabed Disturbance: Extensive multibeam (Sidney, BC, Canada) echosounding surveys have recorded more than 250 submarine slope failures in inner Frobisher Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Transits of the Northwest Passage to End of the 2020 Navigation Season Atlantic Ocean ↔ Arctic Ocean ↔ Pacific Ocean
    TRANSITS OF THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE TO END OF THE 2020 NAVIGATION SEASON ATLANTIC OCEAN ↔ ARCTIC OCEAN ↔ PACIFIC OCEAN R. K. Headland and colleagues 7 April 2021 Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1ER. <[email protected]> The earliest traverse of the Northwest Passage was completed in 1853 starting in the Pacific Ocean to reach the Atlantic Oceam, but used sledges over the sea ice of the central part of Parry Channel. Subsequently the following 319 complete maritime transits of the Northwest Passage have been made to the end of the 2020 navigation season, before winter began and the passage froze. These transits proceed to or from the Atlantic Ocean (Labrador Sea) in or out of the eastern approaches to the Canadian Arctic archipelago (Lancaster Sound or Foxe Basin) then the western approaches (McClure Strait or Amundsen Gulf), across the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea of the Arctic Ocean, through the Bering Strait, from or to the Bering Sea of the Pacific Ocean. The Arctic Circle is crossed near the beginning and the end of all transits except those to or from the central or northern coast of west Greenland. The routes and directions are indicated. Details of submarine transits are not included because only two have been reported (1960 USS Sea Dragon, Capt. George Peabody Steele, westbound on route 1 and 1962 USS Skate, Capt. Joseph Lawrence Skoog, eastbound on route 1). Seven routes have been used for transits of the Northwest Passage with some minor variations (for example through Pond Inlet and Navy Board Inlet) and two composite courses in summers when ice was minimal (marked ‘cp’).
    [Show full text]
  • 198 13. Repulse Bay. This Is an Important Summer Area for Seals
    198 13. Repulse Bay. This is an important summer area for seals (Canadian Wildlife Service 1972) and a primary seal-hunting area for Repulse Bay. 14. Roes Welcome Sound. This is an important concentration area for ringed seals and an important hunting area for Repulse Bay. Marine traffic, materials staging, and construction of the crossing could displace seals or degrade their habitat. 15. Southampton-Coats Island. The southern coastal area of Southampton Island is an important concentration area for ringed seals and is the primary ringed and bearded seal hunting area for the Coral Harbour Inuit. Fisher and Evans Straits and all coasts of Coats Island are important seal-hunting areas in late summer and early fall. Marine traffic, materials staging, and construction of the crossing could displace seals or degrade their habitat. 16.7.2 Communities Affected Communities that could be affected by impacts on seal populations are Resolute and, to a lesser degree, Spence Bay, Chesterfield Inlet, and Gjoa Haven. Effects on Arctic Bay would be minor. Coral Harbour and Repulse Bay could be affected if the Quebec route were chosen. Seal meat makes up the most important part of the diet in Resolute, Spence Bay, Coral Harbour, Repulse Bay, and Arctic Bay. It is a secondary, but still important food in Chesterfield Inlet and Gjoa Haven. Seal skins are an important source of income for Spence Bay, Resolute, Coral Harbour, Repulse Bay, and Arctic Bay and a less important income source for Chesterfield Inlet and Gjoa Haven. 16.7.3 Data Gaps Major data gaps concerning impacts on seal populations are: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Complete Dissertation Kua 1
    Trends and Ontology of Artistic Practices of the Dorset Culture 800 BC - 1300 AD Hardenberg, Mari Publication date: 2013 Document version Early version, also known as pre-print Citation for published version (APA): Hardenberg, M. (2013). Trends and Ontology of Artistic Practices of the Dorset Culture 800 BC - 1300 AD. København: Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet. Download date: 08. Apr. 2020 Trends and Ontology of Artistic Practices of the Dorset Culture 800 BC – 1300 AD Volume 1 By © Mari Hardenberg A Dissertation Submitted to the Ph.d.- School In Partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy SAXO-Institute, Department of Prehistoric Archaeology, Faculty of Humanities University of Copenhagen August 2013 Copenhagen Denmark ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the various artistic carvings produced by the hunter-gatherer Dorset people who occupied the eastern Arctic and temperate regions of Canada and Greenland between circa BC 800 – AD 1300. It includes considerations on how the carved objects affected and played a role in Dorset social life. To consider the role of people, things and other beings that may be said to play as actors in interdependent entanglements of actions, the agency/actor- network theory is employed. From this theoretical review an interpretation of social life as created by the ways people interact with the material world is presented. This framework is employed as a lens into the social role and meaning the carvings played in the Dorset society. The examined assemblages were recovered from a series of Dorset settlement sites, mainly in house, midden, and burial contexts, providing a substantive case study through which variations and themes of carvings are studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanisivik – Canada’S First High Arctic Mine
    INUIT ENCOUNTERS WITH COLONIAL CAPITAL: NANISIVIK – CANADA’S FIRST HIGH ARCTIC MINE by Tee Wern Lim B.Com. (Hons)., The University of Otago, 2006 B.A., The University of Otago, 2008 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Resource Management and Environmental Studies) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) January 2013 © Tee Wern Lim, 2013 Abstract Mineral development has a long history of occurring in the territory of Indigenous communities. In Canada’s North, mineral exploration and mine development has become the most significant economic development strategy for Nunavut, with unprecedented levels of investment taking place today. However, broader and long-term implications of mineral development, and relevant historical experiences, are not well understood or documented. This thesis investigates a historically significant case: Canada’s first high Arctic mine, the Nanisivik lead-zinc mine, which operated near the Inuit community of Arctic Bay from 1976- 2002. Across two papers, this thesis focuses on the mine’s development in the early 1970s, and closure in the 2000s. Through a Marxian analysis utilizing the constructs of primitive accumulation and modes of production, chapter 2 outlines non-renewable resource-based industrial capitalism (exemplified by Nanisivik) as a distinct and severe structure of dispossession. This is contrasted with prior periods of similarly colonial but merchant capitalist resource extraction, namely whaling and the fur trade. I explain how the State and capital combined to impose capitalist relations of production on a predominantly noncapitalist Inuit social formation. Aspects of structural resistance to this imposition are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Qikiqtani Region Arctic Ocean
    OVERVIEW 2017 NUNAVUT MINERAL EXPLORATION, MINING & GEOSCIENCE QIKIQTANI REGION ARCTIC OCEAN OCÉAN ARCTIQUE LEGEND Commodity (Number of Properties) Base Metals, Active (2) Mine, Active (1) Diamonds, Active (2) Quttinirpaaq NP Sanikiluaq Mine, Inactive (2) Gold, Active (1) Areas with Surface and/or Subsurface Restrictions 10 CPMA Caribou Protection Measures Apply ISLANDS Belcher MBS Migratory Bird Sanctuary NP National Park Nares Strait Islands NWA National Wildlife Area - ÉLISABETH Nansen TP Territorial Park WP Wildlife Preserve WS Wildlife Sanctuary Sound ELLESMERE ELIZABETHREINE ISLAND Inuit Owned Lands (Fee simple title) Kane Surface Only LA Agassiz Basin Surface and Subsurface Ice Cap QUEEN Geological Mapping Programs Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office ÎLES DE Kalaallit Nunaat Boundaries Peary Channel Müller GREENLAND/GROENLAND NLCA1 Nunavut Settlement Area Ice CapAXEL Nunavut Regions HEIBERG ÎLE (DENMARK/DANEMARK) NILCA 2 Nunavik Settlement Area ISLAND James Bay WP Provincial / Territorial D'ELLESMERE James Bay Transportation Routes Massey Sound Twin Islands WS Milne Inlet Tote Road / Proposed Rail Line Hassel Sound Prince of Wales Proposed Steensby Inlet Rail Line Prince Ellef Ringnes Icefield Gustaf Adolf Amund Meliadine Road Island Proposed Nunavut to Manitoba Road Sea Ringnes Eureka Sound Akimiski 1 Akimiski I. NLCA The Nunavut Land Claims Agreement Island Island MBS 2 NILCA The Nunavik Inuit Land Claims Agreement Norwegian Bay Baie James Boatswain Bay MBS ISLANDSHazen Strait Belcher Channel Byam Martin Channel Penny S Grise Fiord
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Resources Report
    NTI IIBA for Phase I Draft: Conservation Cultural Heritage Areas Resources Report Cultural Heritage Area: Akpait and and Interpretative Qaqulluit National Wildlife Materials Study Areas Prepared for Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. 1 May 2011 This report is part of a set of studies and a database produced for Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. as part of the project: NTI IIBA for Conservation Areas, Cultural Resources Inventory and Interpretative Materials Study Inquiries concerning this project and the report should be addressed to: David Kunuk Director of Implementation Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. 3rd Floor, Igluvut Bldg. P.O. Box 638 Iqaluit, Nunavut X0A 0H0 E: [email protected] T: (867) 975‐4900 Project Manager, Consulting Team: Julie Harris Contentworks Inc. 137 Second Avenue, Suite 1 Ottawa, ON K1S 2H4 Tel: (613) 730‐4059 Email: [email protected] Report Authors: Philip Goldring, Consultant: Historian and Heritage/Place Names Specialist Julie Harris, Contentworks Inc.: Heritage Specialist and Historian Nicole Brandon, Consultant: Archaeologist Note on Place Names: The current official names of places are used here except in direct quotations from historical documents. Throughout the document “Qikiqtarjuaq” refers to the settlement established in the 1950s and previously known as Broughton Island. Except when used in a direct quotation, the term “Broughton Island” in the report refers to the geographic feature (the island) on which the community of Qikiqtarjuaq is located. Names of places that do not have official names will appear as they are found in
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Arctic Marine Atlas
    Lincoln Sea Hall Basin MARINE ATLAS ARCTIC CANADA’S GREENLAND Ellesmere Island Kane Basin Nares Strait N nd ansen Sou s d Axel n Sve Heiberg rdr a up Island l Ch ann North CANADA’S s el I Pea Water ry Ch a h nnel Massey t Sou Baffin e Amund nd ISR Boundary b Ringnes Bay Ellef Norwegian Coburg Island Grise Fiord a Ringnes Bay Island ARCTIC MARINE z Island EEZ Boundary Prince i Borden ARCTIC l Island Gustaf E Adolf Sea Maclea Jones n Str OCEAN n ait Sound ATLANTIC e Mackenzie Pe Ball nn antyn King Island y S e trait e S u trait it Devon Wel ATLAS Stra OCEAN Q Prince l Island Clyde River Queens in Bylot Patrick Hazen Byam gt Channel o Island Martin n Island Ch tr. Channel an Pond Inlet S Bathurst nel Qikiqtarjuaq liam A Island Eclipse ust Lancaster Sound in Cornwallis Sound Hecla Ch Fitzwil Island and an Griper nel ait Bay r Resolute t Melville Barrow Strait Arctic Bay S et P l Island r i Kel l n e c n e n Somerset Pangnirtung EEZ Boundary a R M'Clure Strait h Island e C g Baffin Island Brodeur y e r r n Peninsula t a P I Cumberland n Peel Sound l e Sound Viscount Stefansson t Melville Island Sound Prince Labrador of Wales Igloolik Prince Sea it Island Charles ra Hadley Bay Banks St s Island le a Island W Hall Beach f Beaufort o M'Clintock Gulf of Iqaluit e c n Frobisher Bay i Channel Resolution r Boothia Boothia Sea P Island Sachs Franklin Peninsula Committee Foxe Harbour Strait Bay Melville Peninsula Basin Kimmirut Taloyoak N UNAT Minto Inlet Victoria SIA VUT Makkovik Ulukhaktok Kugaaruk Foxe Island Hopedale Liverpool Amundsen Victoria King
    [Show full text]
  • Community Areas of Interest – Multiple Values
    Written Submission No. 36 2016 Draft Nunavut Land Use Plan Proposed Land Use Designation: Community Areas of Interest – Multiple Values - 36A. Allen Bay - Resolute Passage – Resolute Bay, 36B. Southeastern Bathurst Island – Western McDougall Sound, 36C. Southwestern Bathurst Island, and 36D. Maury Channel To: The Nunavut Planning Commission From: The Qikiqtaaluk Wildlife Board (QWB), and the Hunters and Trappers Organization (HTO) of Resolute Bay Background Information: Multiple resources are highly valued by the Inuit of Resolute Bay in four areas (i.e., Multiple Value Areas, MVAs). One of these areas (MVA 36A) is a marine area with islands close to the hamlet of Resolute Bay, and includes Allen Bay and Resolute Passage. MVA 36B is a terrestrial and marine area on southeastern Bathurst Island and western McDougall Sound. MVA 36C is a terrestrial area on southwestern Bathurst Island, and MVA 36D is a marine area north of Cornwallis Island in Maury Channel. Without protection of these four areas, plus others, the Nunavut Land Use Plan will fail in its goal to protect and promote the well-being of all of Nunavut’s residents as a primary purpose of land use planning under Article 11 of the Nunavut Agreement. All of these MVAs are important community harvesting areas for wildlife, including but not limited to: ringed, bearded and harp seals, beluga, narwhal, bowhead, walrus, Peary caribou, muskoxen, wolves, snow geese, brant, common and king eiders, Arctic char, and polar bears. All of these areas are critically important to maintain the health, culture and heritage of the Inuit of Resolute Bay. 1 Industrial development in or near these areas would degrade their value.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility and Inuit Life, 1950 to 1975
    NUUTAUNIQ : MOBILITY AND INUIT LIFE, 1950 TO 1975 CONTENTS Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 6 Kinship and Place........................................................................................................................ 7 Consent........................................................................................................................................ 8 Moved Groups .............................................................................................................................. 10 The Dundas Harbour Relocations ............................................................................................. 10 The High Arctic Relocations ..................................................................................................... 13 The Cumberland Sound Evacuations ........................................................................................ 19 Moving Individuals....................................................................................................................... 23 Medical Evacuations ................................................................................................................. 24 Education...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nunavut, a Creation Story. the Inuit Movement in Canada's Newest Territory
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE August 2019 Nunavut, A Creation Story. The Inuit Movement in Canada's Newest Territory Holly Ann Dobbins Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Dobbins, Holly Ann, "Nunavut, A Creation Story. The Inuit Movement in Canada's Newest Territory" (2019). Dissertations - ALL. 1097. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/1097 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract This is a qualitative study of the 30-year land claim negotiation process (1963-1993) through which the Inuit of Nunavut transformed themselves from being a marginalized population with few recognized rights in Canada to becoming the overwhelmingly dominant voice in a territorial government, with strong rights over their own lands and waters. In this study I view this negotiation process and all of the activities that supported it as part of a larger Inuit Movement and argue that it meets the criteria for a social movement. This study bridges several social sciences disciplines, including newly emerging areas of study in social movements, conflict resolution, and Indigenous studies, and offers important lessons about the conditions for a successful mobilization for Indigenous rights in other states. In this research I examine the extent to which Inuit values and worldviews directly informed movement emergence and continuity, leadership development and, to some extent, negotiation strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Plan to Protect the Serengeti of the Arctic
    Behind the Plan to Protect the Serengeti of the Arctic newsdeeply.com /oceans/articles/2017/08/24/behind-the-plan-to-protect-the-serengeti-of-the-arctic For nearly 50 years, Inuit in northeastern Canada have been pushing for federal protection of the fragile ecosystem in Lancaster Sound that they subsist on. The Sound, which forms the eastern gateway to the Northwest Passage, has been called the Serengeti of the Arctic for its rich diversity of wildlife, including narwhals, belugas and polar bears. It’s also believed to hold some of the world’s largest offshore oil reserves. The Inuit’s perseverance finally paid off last week with an announcement by the Canadian government, the territory of Nunavut and the Qikiqtani Inuit Association (QIA) that Lancaster Sound – now to be known as Tallurutiup Imanga – will be protected by a national marine conservation area much larger than one proposed just seven years ago. Once enacted, the conservation area will mean a complete ban on oil and gas activities, as well as deep-sea mining and ocean dumping. The announcement marks a triumph for the Inuit after decades of negotiation and, at times, strong disagreement over how the area should be managed. “We are patient people,” acknowledged P.J. Akeeagok, president of the QIA, which represents some 14,000 Inuit, including five communities within the conservation area, “but this agreement provides an amazing opportunity.” 1/5 The conservation area will span some 109,000 square km (42,200 square miles) – more than double what was first proposed by the federal government in 2010, after the Inuit went to court to block seismic testing – making it Canada’s largest protected area.
    [Show full text]