DOCSLIB.ORG

Studies of Recent Eruptive Phenomena at Kīlauea Volcano

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Studies of Recent Eruptive Phenomena at Kīlauea Volcano STUDIES OF RECENT ERUPTIVE PHENOMENA AT KĪLAUEA VOLCANO A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT FOR THE DEGREE REQUIREMENTS OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS DECEMBER 2015 By Tim R. Orr Dissertation Committee: Bruce Houghton, Chairperson Sarah Fagents Scott Rowland Don Swanson Steve Businger Acknowledgments This work is the culmination of a plan, long set aside, that brought me to Hawaiʻi more than a decade ago. I extend my sincere gratitude to my advisor, Bruce Houghton, for helping to finally bring this plan to fruition. Bruce’s support and advice have been invaluable, and I look forward to continued collaboration. In addition, Alison Houghton has been a gem, and I am grateful for her hospitality. I am also indebted to my dissertation committee—Sarah Fagents, Scott Rowland, Don Swanson, and Steve Businger—for their guidance and support. This research would not have been possible without my colleagues at the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory (HVO), in particular Matt Patrick and Kelly Wooten, with whom I spend many long days in the trenches. I am appreciative to my supervisors, Jim Kauahikaua and Tina Neal, for permitting me to take time off to pursue my studies. HVO’s technical staff worked tirelessly to ensure continued operation of the webcam network from which many of the observations used in this dissertation are acquired. Thanks, too, to helicopter pilot David Okita, for always bringing me back from the field safely. Finally, I am humbled by the unwavering love and support of my family, who were always there when I came home. The data presented in this dissertation was collected in the normal course of my duties as a geologist at the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, funded through the U.S. Geological Survey’s Volcano Hazards Program. Additional support was provided by Bruce Houghton under NSF grant EAR-1427357e. ii Abstract Kīlauea Volcano, on the island of Hawaiʻi, hosts a broad range of basaltic eruptive styles that have traditionally been studied with relatively sparse observations and data. Recent advances in digital camera and webcam technology, however, as well as improvements in the sensitivity and acquisition rate of geophysical data, offer new opportunities to study these processes. Here, robust visual and continuous camera observations are integrated with high-rate geophysical data in four studies, to enhance our understanding of eruptive activity at Kīlauea: (1) A brief eruption on Kīlauea’s East Rift Zone during 2007 led to a pause in the long-lived Puʻu ʻŌʻō eruption. Activity resumed with the refilling of the Puʻu ʻŌʻō crater, first by lava, and then by endogenous uplift. Filling culminated in the opening of a new eruptive fissure at Puʻu ʻŌʻō, marking the start of a new period of eruptive activity. (2) During 2010, lava flows advanced toward the Kalapana Gardens subdivision on Hawaiʻi’s southeast coast, eventually destroying three homes. As the relatively low-discharge flow advanced into this area, it was laterally confined by low topography. Subsequent inflation was focused over the lava tube that developed in the flow, forming a long, sinuous tumulus that snaked across the gently sloping terrain. The unusual feature may be an analog for similar lava flow structures identified in New Mexico and on Mars. In addition, the sinuous tumulus was the source of frequent breakouts associated with cycles of deflation and inflation at Kīlauea’s summit, providing a means of forecasting activity. (3) Kīlauea’s ongoing summit eruption has been punctuated by small, impulsive explosive eruptions since it began in 2008. High-rate webcam imagery shows convincingly that these explosive events were triggered by rockfalls from the vent walls that directly impacted the top of the lava column, generating a rebound splash (Worthington jet). (4) The March 2011 Kamoamoa eruption, preceded by months of precursory changes, was exceptionally well documented with an array of geological, geophysical, and geochemical observations. This multiparametric monitoring suggests that the eruption was driven by an imbalance between the magma supplied to and erupted from the Puʻu ʻŌʻō vent. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgments .................................................................................................... ii Abstract ................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ......................................................................................................... viii List of Figures ......................................................................................................... ix Chapter 1 .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Dissertation Overview ............................................................................... 1 1.2 Kīlauea magmatic system and structure .................................................... 2 1.3 Early eruptive history ................................................................................ 3 1.4 The Puʻu ʻŌʻō eruption ............................................................................. 7 1.4.1 1983–1986: High fountaining at Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō ........................................... 7 1.4.2 1986–1992: Continuous effusion from Kupaianaha .............................. 7 1.4.3 1992–1997: Flank vents and shield building at Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō .................. 11 1.4.4 1997–2007: Resumption of flank vents and shield building ............... 11 1.4.5 2007–2011: Down-rift migration to the episode 58 vent .................... 15 1.4.6 2011–2014 Shifting vents; flows transition to northeast ..................... 17 1.4.7 2014–2015 The Pāhoa lava flow crisis ................................................ 18 Chapter 2 ................................................................................................................ 20 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 20 2.2 Data collection......................................................................................... 22 2.3 Eruption chronology ................................................................................ 25 2.3.1 Setting the stage (early 2007) .............................................................. 25 2.3.2 Crater floor subsidence at Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō ................................................... 25 2.3.3 Refilling of Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō.......................................................................... 29 2.3.4 Crater floor uplift ................................................................................. 33 2.3.5 Opening of vents along crater-bounding fault ..................................... 34 2.3.6 Resumption of crater vent effusion ..................................................... 36 2.3.7 Onset of episode 58 ............................................................................. 36 2.4 Results and discussion ............................................................................. 38 iv 2.4.1 Crater floor subsidence ........................................................................ 38 2.4.2 Crater infilling and uplift ..................................................................... 39 2.4.3 Onset of episode 58 ............................................................................. 40 2.4.4 Eruption petrology ............................................................................... 41 2.4.5 Trends in intrusive and eruptive activity ............................................. 42 2.5 Conclusions ............................................................................................. 43 Chapter 3 ................................................................................................................ 45 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 45 3.2 Eruption monitoring methods.................................................................. 49 3.2.1 Flow field mapping .............................................................................. 49 3.2.2 Webcams and time-lapse cameras ....................................................... 49 3.3 Tumulus geometry measurements ........................................................... 50 3.3.1 Digital Elevation Models ..................................................................... 50 3.3.2 Crack and tumulus measurements ....................................................... 51 3.4 Description of eruptive activity ............................................................... 51 3.4.1 June–July 2010 eruptive activity ......................................................... 51 3.4.2 Sinuous tumulus formation and morphology ...................................... 53 3.4.3 DI events and breakouts: August–November 2010 ............................. 56 3.5 Discussion ............................................................................................... 63 3.5.1 Development of an inflated lava tube .................................................. 63 3.5.2 Earth and Mars examples .................................................................... 67 3.5.3 Forecasting lava tube breakouts .......................................................... 71 3.6 Summary ................................................................................................. 73 Chapter 4 ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hawaii Volcanoes National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/163 THIS PAGE: Geologists have lloongng been monimonittoorriing the volcanoes of Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park. Here lalava cascades durduriingng the 1969-1971 Mauna Ulu eruption of Kīlauea VolVolcano. NotNotee the Mauna Ulu fountountaiain in the background. U.S. Geologiogicalcal SurSurvveyey PhotPhotoo by J. B. Judd (12/30/1969). ON THE COVER: ContContiinuouslnuouslyy eruptuptiingng since 1983, Kīllaueaauea Volcano contcontiinues to shapshapee Hawai‘Hawai‘i VoVollccanoes NatiNationalonal ParkPark.. Photo courtesy Lisa Venture/UniversiUniversitty of Cincinnati. Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/163 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 December 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Denver, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaiian Volcanoes: from Source to Surface Site Waikolao, Hawaii 20 - 24 August 2012
    AGU Chapman Conference on Hawaiian Volcanoes: From Source to Surface Site Waikolao, Hawaii 20 - 24 August 2012 Conveners Michael Poland, USGS – Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, USA Paul Okubo, USGS – Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, USA Ken Hon, University of Hawai'i at Hilo, USA Program Committee Rebecca Carey, University of California, Berkeley, USA Simon Carn, Michigan Technological University, USA Valerie Cayol, Obs. de Physique du Globe de Clermont-Ferrand Helge Gonnermann, Rice University, USA Scott Rowland, SOEST, University of Hawai'i at M noa, USA Financial Support 2 AGU Chapman Conference on Hawaiian Volcanoes: From Source to Surface Site Meeting At A Glance Sunday, 19 August 2012 1600h – 1700h Welcome Reception 1700h – 1800h Introduction and Highlights of Kilauea’s Recent Eruption Activity Monday, 20 August 2012 0830h – 0900h Welcome and Logistics 0900h – 0945h Introduction – Hawaiian Volcano Observatory: Its First 100 Years of Advancing Volcanism 0945h – 1215h Magma Origin and Ascent I 1030h – 1045h Coffee Break 1215h – 1330h Lunch on Your Own 1330h – 1430h Magma Origin and Ascent II 1430h – 1445h Coffee Break 1445h – 1600h Magma Origin and Ascent Breakout Sessions I, II, III, IV, and V 1600h – 1645h Magma Origin and Ascent III 1645h – 1900h Poster Session Tuesday, 21 August 2012 0900h – 1215h Magma Storage and Island Evolution I 1215h – 1330h Lunch on Your Own 1330h – 1445h Magma Storage and Island Evolution II 1445h – 1600h Magma Storage and Island Evolution Breakout Sessions I, II, III, IV, and V 1600h – 1645h Magma Storage
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 the Evolution of Seismic Monitoring Systems at the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory
    Characteristics of Hawaiian Volcanoes Editors: Michael P. Poland, Taeko Jane Takahashi, and Claire M. Landowski U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1801, 2014 Chapter 2 The Evolution of Seismic Monitoring Systems at the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory By Paul G. Okubo1, Jennifer S. Nakata1, and Robert Y. Koyanagi1 Abstract the Island of Hawai‘i. Over the past century, thousands of sci- entific reports and articles have been published in connection In the century since the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory with Hawaiian volcanism, and an extensive bibliography has (HVO) put its first seismographs into operation at the edge of accumulated, including numerous discussions of the history of Kīlauea Volcano’s summit caldera, seismic monitoring at HVO HVO and its seismic monitoring operations, as well as research (now administered by the U.S. Geological Survey [USGS]) has results. From among these references, we point to Klein and evolved considerably. The HVO seismic network extends across Koyanagi (1980), Apple (1987), Eaton (1996), and Klein and the entire Island of Hawai‘i and is complemented by stations Wright (2000) for details of the early growth of HVO’s seismic installed and operated by monitoring partners in both the USGS network. In particular, the work of Klein and Wright stands and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The out because their compilation uses newspaper accounts and seismic data stream that is available to HVO for its monitoring other reports of the effects of historical earthquakes to extend of volcanic and seismic activity in Hawai‘i, therefore, is built Hawai‘i’s detailed seismic history to nearly a century before from hundreds of data channels from a diverse collection of instrumental monitoring began at HVO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cavernicolous Fauna of Hawaiian Lava Tubes, 1
    Pacific Insects 15 (1): 139-151 20 May 1973 THE CAVERNICOLOUS FAUNA OF HAWAIIAN LAVA TUBES, 1. INTRODUCTION By Francis G. Howarth2 Abstract: The Hawaiian Islands offer great potential for evolutionary research. The discovery of specialized cavernicoles among the adaptively radiating fauna adds to that potential. About 50 lava tubes and a few other types of caves on 4 islands have been investigated. Tree roots, both living and dead, are the main energy source in the caves. Some organic material percolates into the cave through cracks associated with the roots. Cave slimes and accidentals also supply some nutrients. Lava tubes form almost exclusively in pahoehoe basalt, usually by the crusting over of lava rivers. However, the formation can be quite complex. Young basalt has numerous avenues such as vesicles, fissures, layers, and smaller tubes which allow some intercave and interlava flow dispersal of cavernicoles. In older flows these avenues are plugged by siltation or blocked or cut by erosion. The Hawaiian Islands are a string of oceanic volcanic islands stretching more than 2500 km across the mid-Pacific. The western islands are old eroded mountains which are now raised coral reefs and shoals. The eight main eastern islands total 16,667 km2 and are relatively young in geologic age. Ages range from 5+ million years for the island of Kauai to 1 million years for the largest island, Hawaii (Macdonald & Abbott, 1970). The native fauna and flora are composed of those groups which dis­ persed across upwards of 4000 km of open ocean or island hopped and became successfully established.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaiʻi Board on Geographic Names Correction of Diacritical Marks in Hawaiian Names Project - Hawaiʻi Island
    Hawaiʻi Board on Geographic Names Correction of Diacritical Marks in Hawaiian Names Project - Hawaiʻi Island Status Key: 1 = Not Hawaiian; 2 = Not Reviewed; 3 = More Research Needed; 4 = HBGN Corrected; 5 = Already Correct in GNIS; 6 = Name Change Status Feat ID Feature Name Feature Class Corrected Name Source Notes USGS Quad Name 1 365008 1940 Cone Summit Mauna Loa 1 365009 1949 Cone Summit Mauna Loa 3 358404 Aa Falls Falls PNH: not listed Kukuihaele 5 358406 ʻAʻahuwela Summit ‘A‘ahuwela PNH Puaakala 3 358412 Aale Stream Stream PNH: not listed Piihonua 4 358413 Aamakao Civil ‘A‘amakāō PNH HBGN: associative Hawi 4 358414 Aamakao Gulch Valley ‘A‘amakāō Gulch PNH Hawi 5 358415 ʻĀʻāmanu Civil ‘Ā‘āmanu PNH Kukaiau 5 358416 ʻĀʻāmanu Gulch Valley ‘Ā‘āmanu Gulch PNH HBGN: associative Kukaiau PNH: Ahalanui, not listed, Laepao‘o; Oneloa, 3 358430 Ahalanui Laepaoo Oneloa Civil Maui Kapoho 4 358433 Ahinahena Summit ‘Āhinahina PNH Puuanahulu 5 1905282 ʻĀhinahina Point Cape ‘Āhinahina Point PNH Honaunau 3 365044 Ahiu Valley PNH: not listed; HBGN: ‘Āhiu in HD Kau Desert 3 358434 Ahoa Stream Stream PNH: not listed Papaaloa 3 365063 Ahole Heiau Locale PNH: Āhole, Maui Pahala 3 1905283 Ahole Heiau Locale PNH: Āhole, Maui Milolii PNH: not listed; HBGN: Āholehōlua if it is the 3 1905284 ʻĀhole Holua Locale slide, Āholeholua if not the slide Milolii 3 358436 Āhole Stream Stream PNH: Āhole, Maui Papaaloa 4 358438 Ahu Noa Summit Ahumoa PNH Hawi 4 358442 Ahualoa Civil Āhualoa PNH Honokaa 4 358443 Ahualoa Gulch Valley Āhualoa Gulch PNH HBGN: associative Honokaa
    [Show full text]
  • Basaltic Explosive Volcanism: Constraints from Deposits and Models B.F
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Chemie der Erde 68 (2008) 117–140 www.elsevier.de/chemer INVITED REVIEW Basaltic explosive volcanism: Constraints from deposits and models B.F. HoughtonÃ, H.M. Gonnermann Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA Received 13 March 2008; accepted 10 April 2008 Abstract Basaltic pyroclastic volcanism takes place over a range of scales and styles, from weak discrete Strombolian 2 3 1 7 8 1 explosions ( 10 –10 kg sÀ ) to Plinian eruptions of moderate intensity (10 –10 kg sÀ ). Recent well-documented historical eruptions from Etna, Kı¯lauea and Stromboli typify this diversity. Etna is Europe’s largest and most voluminously productive volcano with an extraordinary level and diversity of Strombolian to subplinian activity since 1990. Kı¯lauea, the reference volcano for Hawaiian fountaining, has four recent eruptions with high fountaining (4400 m) activity in 1959, 1960, 1969 (–1974) and 1983–1986 (–2008); other summit (1971, 1974, 1982) and flank eruptions have been characterized by low fountaining activity. Stromboli is the type location for mildly explosive Strombolian eruptions, and from 1999 to 2008 these persisted at a rate of ca. 9 per hour, briefly interrupted in 2003 and 2007 by vigorous paroxysmal eruptions. Several properties of basaltic pyroclastic deposits described here, such as bed geometry, grain size, clast morphology and vesicularity, and crystal content are keys to understand the dynamics of the parent eruptions. The lack of clear correlations between eruption rate and style, as well as observed rapid fluctuations in eruptive behavior, point to the likelihood of eruption style being moderated by differences in the fluid dynamics of magma and gas ascent and the mechanism by which the erupting magma fragments.
    [Show full text]
  • And Ground-Based Geophysical Data Tracking of Magma Migration in Shallow Feeding System of Mount Etna Volcano
    remote sensing Article Space- and Ground-Based Geophysical Data Tracking of Magma Migration in Shallow Feeding System of Mount Etna Volcano Marco Laiolo 1,* , Maurizio Ripepe 2, Corrado Cigolini 1, Diego Coppola 1, Massimo Della Schiava 2, Riccardo Genco 2, Lorenzo Innocenti 2, Giorgio Lacanna 2, Emanuele Marchetti 2, Francesco Massimetti 1,2 and Maria Cristina Silengo 2 1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Torino, V. Valperga Caluso 4; 10125 Torino, Italy; [email protected] (C.C.); [email protected] (D.C.); [email protected] (F.M.) 2 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Firenze, V. G. La Pira 4; 50121 Firenze, Italy; maurizio.ripepe@unifi.it (M.R.); massimo.dellaschiava@unifi.it (M.D.S.); riccardo.genco@unifi.it (R.G.); lorenzo.innocenti@unifi.it (L.I.); giorgio.lacanna@unifi.it (G.L.); emanuele.marchetti@unifi.it (E.M.); [email protected] (M.C.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 April 2019; Accepted: 16 May 2019; Published: 18 May 2019 Abstract: After a month-long increase in activity at the summit craters, on 24 December 2018, the Etna volcano experienced a short-lived lateral effusive event followed by a rapid resumption of low-level explosive and degassing activity at the summit vents. By combining space (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer; MODIS and SENTINEL-2 images) and ground-based geophysical data, we track, in near real-time, the thermal, seismic and infrasonic changes associated with Etna’s activity during the September–December 2018 period. Satellite thermal data reveal that the fissural eruption was preceded by a persistent increase of summit activity, as reflected by overflow episodes in New SouthEast Crater (NSE) sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Explore Crater Rim Drive and Chain of Craters Road VISITOR ALERT High Amounts of Dangerous Sulfur Dioxide Gas Are Present at the Volcano”S Summit
    National Park Service Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park U.S. Department of the Interior Explore Crater Rim Drive and Chain of Craters Road VISITOR ALERT High amounts of dangerous sulfur dioxide gas are present at the volcano”s summit. Personal Safety When driving along Crater Rim Drive, keep your windows closed when visible. Volcanic gas conditions (visually similar to smog) exist along Chain of Craters Road— keep your windows closed when visible. If the air irritates, smells bad, or you have difficulty breathing, return to your vehicle and leave the area. If open, the Kīlauea Visitor Center is a clean air environment. Please be flexible in your travel plans. Some areas may be closed for your safety. Points of Interest Automated Cell Phone Tour 0 Dial 1-808-217-9285 to learn more about the numbered stops listed below. Kīpukapuaulu Nāmakanipaio For emergencies call Mauna Loa Road (13.5-miles one way) Kīlauea Military Camp Campground 808-985-6170 or 911 11 9 Steam Vents 1 To Kailua- Sulphur Banks 4 Kona Crater Rim Drive Jaggar Kīlauea Overlook Museum and Picnic Area Kïlauea Visitor Center 0 Volcano Village 2 7 Volcano House (Gas and Food) closed for renovations Park Entrance 11 KĪLAUEA CALDERA To Hilo 6 Halema‘uma‘u Kīlauea Iki Crater Crater Overlook Thurston Lava Tube (Nāhuku) 3 Road Closed Pu‘u Pua‘i Due to high amounts of sulphur dioxide gas. Pit Devastation Trail 5 Craters Hilina Pali Road (9 miles / 14.5 km one-way) Pu‘u Huluhulu Cinder Cone Hilina Pali Mauna Ulu Shield Overlook Kulanaokuaiki Mau Loa o Campground Mauna Ulu Pu‘u
    [Show full text]
  • Maunaloa/Current/Longterm.Html K!Lauea – the Most Active Volcano on Earth K!Lauea Structure
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
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, May 4, 2021 1. Call to Order 2:30 Pm Leiopapa a Kamehameha Building Office
    HA WAI'I BOARDON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES (HBGN) Tuesday, May 4, 2021 2:30 p.m. Leiopapa A Kamehameha Building Officeof Planning, 6th Floor Conference Room 235 S. Beretania Street Honolulu, Hawai'i 96813 Zoom Meeting information: https://bit.ly/hbgn-20210504 Meeting ID: 932 3302 1740 Passcode: 581819 1. Call to Order 2. Review ofMeeting Minutes forApril 6, 2021 3. Public Comments 4. Announcements 5. Status ofbills and resolutions in the Legislature 6. Discussion and Action on Permitted Interaction Group for Lo'ihi / Kama'ehu 7. Review selected place names on the island ofHawai'i (Camara) 8. Adjournment This meeting of the Hawai'i Board on Geographic Names (HBGN) will be available forlive viewing via Zoom. Zoom Meeting information: https://bit.ly/hbgn-20210504 or https://zoom.us/j/93233021740?pwd=Ui9LbmxwMERYRkhDWDR WUHZaeHFRdz09 Meeting ID: 932 3302 1740 Passcode: 581819 MINUTES DRAFT FOR THE MEETING OF THE HAWAI‘I BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES DATE: April 6, 2021 TIME: 2:30 p.m. PLACE: Leiopapa A Kamehameha Building Office of Planning, 6th Floor Library 235 S. Beretania Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96813 AGENDA ITEM 1: Call to Order Mr. Marzan called the meeting to order at 2:36 p.m. The following were in attendance: MEMBERS: Marques Marzan (Bishop Museum) Arthur Buto for Mary Alice Evans (Office of Planning) Meyer Cummins (Land Survey Division) Holly McEldowney (Department of Land and Natural Resources) left early at 3:20pm Niniau Kawaihae (Department of Hawaiian Home Lands) Kapā Oliveira (University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa) Brad Kaʻaleleo Wong (Office of Hawaiian Affairs) ABSENT: None GUESTS: Jennifer Runyon (USGS) Lāmaku Mikahala Roy Melia Lane-Kamahele Regina Hilo Bobby Camara Renee Pualani Louis Catherine Sullivan AGENDA ITEM 2: Review of Meeting Minutes for March 2, 2021 Lamakū Roy asked for her attendance to be recognized and that she is here to comment on the minutes from the March meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Active Volcanoes Using a Handheld Thermal Camera
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Earth-prints Repository Monitoring active volcanoes using a handheld thermal camera Sonia Calvari, Luigi Lodato and Letizia Spampinato Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia – Sezione di Catania, Piazza Roma 2, 95123 Catania (Italy) Abstract Thermal imaging has recently been introduced in volcanology to analyse a number of different volcanic processes. This system allows us to detect magma movements within the summit conduits of active volcanoes, and then to reveal volcanic activity within the craters even through the thick curtain of gases usually released by volcanoes such as Mt Etna and Stromboli. Thermal mapping is essential during effusive eruptions, since it distinguishes lava flows of different age and concealed lava tubes’ path, improving hazard evaluation. Recently, thermal imaging has also been applied to reveal failure planes and instability on the flanks of active volcanoes. Excellent results have been obtained in terms of volcanic prediction during the two recent eruptions of Mt Etna and Stromboli, both occurred in 2002-2003. On Etna, thermal images monthly recorded on the summit of the volcano revealed the opening of fissure systems several months in advance. After the onset of the flank eruption, daily thermal mapping allowed us to monitor a complex lava flow field spreading within a forest, below a thick plume of ash and gas. At Stromboli, helicopter-borne thermal surveys allowed us to recognise the opening of fractures along the Sciara del Fuoco, one hour before the large failure that caused severe destruction on the island on 30 December 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • The November 2002 Eruption of Piton De La Fournaise, Réunion: Tracking the Pre-Eruptive Thermal Evolution of Magma Using Melt Inclusions
    Bull Volcanol (2009) 71:1077–1089 DOI 10.1007/s00445-009-0287-5 RESEARCH ARTICLE The November 2002 eruption of Piton de la Fournaise, Réunion: tracking the pre-eruptive thermal evolution of magma using melt inclusions Nathalie Vigouroux & A. E. Williams-Jones & Paul Wallace & Thomas Staudacher Received: 19 November 2007 /Accepted: 29 April 2009 /Published online: 6 June 2009 # Springer-Verlag 2009 Abstract The November 2002 eruption of Piton de la estimate eruption temperatures. The November 2002 melt Fournaise in the Indian Ocean was typical of the activity of inclusion compositions suggest that they were at temper- the volcano from 1999 to 2006 in terms of duration and atures between 1,070°C and 1,133°C immediately before volume of magma ejected. The first magma erupted was a eruption and quenching. This relatively wide temperature basaltic liquid with a small proportion of olivine phenocrysts range may reflect the fact that most of the melt inclusions (Fo81) that contain small numbers of melt inclusions. In were from olivine in lava samples and therefore likely subsequent flows, olivine crystals were more abundant and underwent minor but variable amounts of post-eruptive 2+ richer in Mg (Fo83–84). These crystals contain numerous melt crystallization and Fe loss by diffusion due to their and fluid inclusions, healed fractures, and dislocation relatively slow cooling on the surface. In contrast, melt features such as kink bands. The major element composition inclusions in tephra samples from past major eruptions of melt inclusions in this later olivine (Fo83–84)isoutof yielded a narrower range of higher eruption temperatures equilibrium with that of its host as a result of extensive post- (1,163–1,181°C).
    [Show full text]